South Dade Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

32.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 128 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 175.0 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.12 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.26 to 0.80 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 17% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-03-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #9 On 3/06/2023 at 4:00 AM, upon entering the third-floor dining room. Resident # 9 was observed asleep in a recliner with the footrest propped up by a dining room chair, between a wall and a column/pillar. (Photographic and video evidence) In an interview conducted on 03/06/2023 at 4:11 AM Staff E, a Registered Nurse (Night Supervisor). Was asked why the residents were sleeping in the dining room. Staff E stated The residents are alone in the room; they try to get out of bed. The nurse will bring them here to guarantee that they are not falling. We bring them all in one area. When asked if this was the normal routine? Staff E stated No, it's only if I don't have enough CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants). I have four CNAs on the floor. These residents are getting out of bed and at risk of falling. We have tried non-pharmacological interventions. During an interview conducted on 03/06/2023 at 04:52 AM Staff E in the presence of the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). Staff E stated: On the 3rd floor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-03-09 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #9 In an observation conducted on 3/06/23 at 4:00 AM, upon entering 3rd floor dining room. Resident # 9 was observed asleep in a recliner with the footrest propped up by a dining room chair. Resident 9 was noted to be wedged between a wall and a column/pillar. In an interview conducted on 03/06/23 at 4:11 AM Staff E, a Registered Nurse (Night Supervisor). Was asked why the residents were in the dining room. Staff E stated The residents are alone in the room; they try to get out of bed. The nurse will bring them here to guarantee that they are not falling. We bring them all in one area. When asked if this was the normal routine? Staff E stated No, it's only if I don't have enough CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants). I have four CNAs on the floor. These residents are getting out of bed and at risk of falling. We have tried non-pharmacological interventions. During an interview conducted on 03/06/23 at 04:52 AM Staff E in the presence of the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). Staff E stated: On the 3rd…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-03-09 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, the facility's administration failed to implement and provide services effectively and efficiently related to ensuring safety measures were in place to prevent negligence and ensure residents are free from restraints and receive the highest practicable quality of care. The facility ' s administration failed to ensure adequate interventions for supervision was assigned to ensure the safety of residents. The facility's administration failed to ensure incontinence care, positioning and implement appropriate and dignified levels care to meet residents identified needs. This affected 8 out 8 sampled residents (Resident #9, #52, #63, #81, #112, #127, #172, #428) observed in the 3rd dining room at 4:00AM on 3/6/2023. On 03/07/2023, it was determined the findings posed Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) to the health and safety of the residents admitted to the facility existed based on the facility's failure to provide care and services to meet the residents' needs by leaving seven residents restrained in recliners and one resident in a wheelchair to sleep in a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0635 — isolated
  Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility had failed to obtain admission orders for a medicated patch for one (Resident #175) out of three sampled newly admitted residents. Resident #175 had an undated medicated patch that the resident reported was for hypertension on the left shoulder but there was no corresponding physician's order in the resident's clinical records, which noted orders for oral hypertensive medications that the resident had been receiving since admission. This deficient practice could have caused severe hypotensive reactions for Resident #175, who had been admitted from the hospital to the facility six days earlier. At the time of the survey, 166 residents resided in the facility.Observation on 12/09/25 at 11:20 AM revealed an undated patch on Resident # 175's left shoulder. (photo evidence) Upon interview, Resident#175 stated: This patch is for hypertension and is to be changed monthly. I received it from the hospital, and I told staff, but no one has done anything.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards for one (Resident#156) out of one sampled resident as evidenced by an observation of Resident #156 in bed unattended while the bed was in a high position. There were 166 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included:On 12/09/25 at 10:20 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #156 lying in bed with legs extended over the edge of the bed. The bed was in a high position. (photo evidence) A call light was in reach; however, Resident#156's arms appeared to be contracted. No staff were present. The surveyor immediately notified Staff E, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), about the identified concern. Staff E, CNA, immediately lowered the bed. The surveyor interviewed Staff E, CNA, about the facility's protocol for supervising residents to prevent falls. Staff E stated, If no staff is present, the bed should be low and the head of bed up so the resident doesn't fall.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews observations and interviews, the facility stored drugs and biologicals contrary to professional standards. Specifically, one out of three medication rooms had expired medical supplies; two out of six medication carts had loose pills, and medications were found at the bedsides of two out of 166 residents who resided in the facility during the survey. The findings included: Record review of facility policy titled Labeling of Medications Storage of Drugs and Biologicals implemented on 11/28/2019, reviewed and revised on 8/2023 revealed Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that all medications and biologicals used in the facility will be labeled and stored in accordance with current state, federal regulations. Resident #45 On 12/08/25 at 10:57 AM Resident #45 was observed in bed with eyes closed in no apparent distress. A bottle of medicated shampoo was observed at bedside. (photo evidence) On 12/08/25 at 11:07 AM Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN) was notified about the identified concern and removed the bottle. Staff C, RN was interviewed about the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure accuracy in providing medications to meet needs for three residents (Resident #121, Resident #95 and Resident #163) out of 17 sampled residents as evidenced by three medication omissions noted during medication administration observation. There were 179 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings Included: On 07/24/2024 at 08:31 AM a medication administration observation was made on the second floor, [NAME] medication cart with Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) for Resident #121. During medication administration Staff H, LPN dispensed one (1) Calcium 500 plus vitamin D chewable tablet into the medication cup. Review of the Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) revealed Resident #121 physician order dated 5/29/2023 for Oyster Shell Calcium/Vitamin D Tablet 500-200 Milligram (mg) per Unit directions- give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for SUPPLEMENT. Staff H, LPN approached the room and was stopped by surveyor and asked to return to medication cart. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-26 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility's quality assurance and assessment committee failed to demonstrate effective plan of actions were implemented to correct identified quality deficiencies in the problem areas related to repeated deficient practice for F755 Pharmacy Services and Procedures and F867 QAPI-QAA Improvement Activities .These repeated deficient practices has the potential to affect any of the 179 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a Recertification survey with exit dated 03/09/2023 the facility was cited F755 Pharmacy Services and Procedures and F867 QAPI-QAA Improvement Activities. Record review of the facility policy and procedure title Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI), implemented June 2021states- It is the policy of this facility to develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. Policy Explanation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed ensure two residents (Resident #142, Resident #117) out of two residents observed during dining were treated with respect and dignity, as evidenced by staff member observed standing while feeding the residents. This facility's deficient practice has the potential to affect any of the 114 residents residing in the facility that required assistance from staff with eating. The finding included: Observation of Resident #117 on 07/21/2024 at 12:30 PM revealed the resident sitting up in bed, Staff A set up the tray and opened containers. The staff was then observed feeding the resident while standing by the resident's bed. Interview with Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on 07/21/2024 at 12:30 PM. Staff A explained she did not get the chair because the chair was behind the wheelchair, and she will grab the chair now. Review of clinical records for Resident #117 revealed an initial admission date of 02/16/2022 and readmitted [DATE].…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed accurately prior to admission and failed to revise the screening following admission for one resident (Resident #63) out of 17 sampled residents. There were 179 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings Included: Record Review of Resident #63's Level I PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) documented Section I: PASRR Screen Decision Making: A: MI (Mental Illness) or suspected MI (check all that apply) - Anxiety and Major Depressive disorder checked off. Findings based on documented history were-Section II Other indicators for PASRR screening Decision-Making: All checked no. Does individual have validating documentation to support dementia or related neurocognitive disorder - no. Section III Not a provisional admission. Section IV No diagnosis or suspicion of SMI or ID indicated. Level II PASRR evaluation not required. PASRR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to follow the care plan for two residents (Resident #102 and Resident #72) as evidenced by observations of Resident #102 in bed with full length siderails and observation of Resident # 72 in bed with one full length of two full length padded siderails in the down position while in bed. There were 179 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: On 07/22/2024 at 9:19 AM Resident #102 was observed in bed with full length bilateral side rails in the up position. On 07/24/2024 at 12:22 PM Resident #102 was observed in bed with full length bilateral side rails in the up position. Resident #102 stated she is comfortable and feels safe with the siderails and staff move the siderails upon request because she cannot move them herself. Review of the medical records for Resident #102 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but not limited to Parkinsonism. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to provide a safe environment for two residents (Resident #43 and Resident #72) out of 17 sampled residents as evidenced by an observation of Resident #43 with smoking materials while not in the designated smoking area. There were 26 residents that smoked residing in the facility that smoked. Observation of one resident (Resident #72) out of two residents reviewed for side rails was noted with one of two full lengths bilateral padded siderails in the down position while in bed and unattended by staff. There were 179 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. The findings included: On 07/21/2024 at 12:24 PM Resident #43 was approached while entering the elevator for an interview. Resident #43 stated: I am going downstairs to smoke. I keep my cigarettes and a lighter on me. Resident #43 showed a lighter and box of cigarettes to surveyor. (photo evidence) On 07/21/2024 at 12:26 PM Resident #43 was accompanied by surveyor to the designated smoking area. Resident #43 was observed smoking in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to administer oxygen therapy at the prescribed rate for one resident (Resident # 26) out of two residents reviewed. As evidenced by observations of Resident # 26 receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at 3 Liters Per Minute (LPM). There were 14 residents residing in the facilty that are require oxygen therapy. The finding included: During observation on 07/22/2024 at 9:15 AM Resident # 26 was noted in bed sleeping with nasal cannula in her nose. The oxygen concentrator's flow meter was set at 3 LPM. Record review of the physician orders dated 06/13/2024 documented orders for Oxygen at 2 LPM via nasal cannula as needed. During observation on 07/23/2024 at 11:30 AM The resident was in bed, awake with the head of the bed elevated with nasal cannula in her nose and the oxygen concentrator's flow meter was set at 3 LPM. Observation of Resident # 26 on 07/24/24 at 02:37 PM Resident was in bed sleeping; the nasal cannula was in place and the oxygen flow meter was set up at 2 LPM. Review of clinical records for Resident #…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VENTURA SERVICES — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $6.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 31% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL