Vivo Healthcare University

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 108.1 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2024-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on kitchen food service observations, staff interviews, facility document review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness with the potential to affect all residents who consumed foods from the facility's kitchen. The facility failed to 1) Date mark open packages of croutons and tea bags, 2) Clean grease build-up inside and around the door area of the convection oven, 3) Clean grease and food substances from the inside door area and oven floor, 4) Clean grease and food debris from the oven tray, 5) Clean food debris stuck on and around the safety guard of the mixer, 6) Clean food debris stuck on the meat slicer, 7) Clean one of two microwaves located in the east unit nourishment room, 8) Clean the ice machine dispenser tray located in the west unit nourishment room, and 9) Address condensation build-up in the walk-in freezer. Food handling and sanitation are important in health care settings serving nursing home residents. Unsafe food handling practices…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for two (Residents #48 and #19) of three residents reviewed for ADL care from a total survey sample of 46 residents. The findings include: 1. A review of Resident #48's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/01/23 with diagnoses including Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), acute chronic diastolic (congestive) hear failure, muscle weakness (generalized), pleural effusion, legal blindness, end stage renal disease (ESRD), hyperthyroidism, arteriosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and hypertension. On 11/05/24 at 10:20 AM, an observation was made of Resident #48's fingernails which were long with brown matter underneath. (photographic evidence obtained) On 11/07/24 at 8:56 AM, an observation was made of Resident #48's fingernails which remained long with brown matter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and a review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for one (Resident #72) of one resident reviewed for accident hazards out of 46 residents in the total survey sample. Medicated ointments in plastic medication cups were left at the resident's bedside. Resident #72 had not been assessed for capability of self-administering/applying medicated ointments. No self-administration assessment was found in the record or provided by the facility during the survey. No care plan was located in the record indicating that the resident was capable of safely self-administering medications/medicated ointments. The findings include: On 11/04/24 at 10:43 AM, two medication cups were observed on the resident's bedside table. (photographic evidence obtained) An interview was conducted with the resident at the time of this observation, who reported that the cups contained her medications, which were the two creams she applied to both her hands for psoriasis.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care, were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for one (Resident #34) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care, from a total survey sample of 46 residents. Resident #34 was not receiving oxygen at the flow rate ordered by her physician. The findings include: On 11/04/24 at 11:20 AM, Resident #34 was observed fully dressed sitting in her wheelchair inside her room wearing a nasal cannula with an oxygen tank on the back of her wheelchair. She reported receiving oxygen at a flow rate of 1.5 liters per minute (L/min) when she was in her wheelchair and 3.0 L/min when in bed and sleeping. Resident #34's oxygen concentrator located at bedside was observed to be set at 3.0 L/min. On 11/07/24 at 10:11 AM, Resident #34 was observed fully dressed in the main dining room sitting in her wheelchair wearing her nasal cannula with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices, by failing to provide dermatology consults as ordered for one (Resident #4) of four sampled residents. The findings include: On 8/26/2024 at 11:44 am, Resident #4 was observed in her room with several areas of blotches (dark red in color) and scaly skin on the palm of her left hand. A blue plastic glove was covering her right hand. When questioned about her hands, Resident #4 stated, she had an unknown skin condition which affected both her hands. She stated that it was present upon her admission into the facility. She was getting a topical cream for it; however, she hadn't received it in some time. She did not know if it had been discontinued nor did she know the proper diagnosis. Resident #4 explained that the facility nurses had advised her that she needed to see a dermatologist,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of protected health information (PHI) for 15 of 15 residents receiving skilled therapy services, by posting a list of residents on the counter top of the East and [NAME] wing nurses' station, visible to other residents and guests. The findings include: On 09/19/2023 at 10:00 am, an observation of the nurse's station on the East Wing revealed a list of fifteen (15) resident names receiving therapy with their appointment times, wing, room, type, duration, and therapy provider taped down to the top of the counter. This information could be seen by residents and guests who were observed passing along the hallway. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 09/19/2023 at 10:23 AM, an observation of the nurse's station on the [NAME] Wing revealed a list of fifteen (15) resident names receiving therapy with their appointment times, wing, room, type, duration, and therapy provider taped down to the top of the counter. This information could be seen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to maintain and implement an infection prevention control program to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment. The facility staff failed to ensure the proper use of protective equipment (PPE) in transmission base precaution (TBP)/COVID-19 isolation room for three (Residents #3, #7, and #6) of four sampled residents; and the facility failed to ensure all staff used proper hand hygiene in a TBP room/COVID-19 isolation room (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]). Failure to adhere to infection control and prevention protocol increase the risk of transmitting communicable diseases and infection. The findings include: During a tour of the facility on 09/19/2023 at 12:30 PM, room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have a sign posted for droplet precautions and isolation instructing staff to cover their eyes, nose and mouth completely. (Photographic evidence obtained) The storage cart for PPE next to the room door in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #47) of 35 sampled residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices, specifically, failure to apply physician-ordered, medicated cream/ointment to an ongoing rash. The findings include: On 12/19/22 at 11:50 a.m., Resident #47 was observed lying in bed, awake. She was scratching at her upper chest and both upper extremities. Her upper chest and both upper extremities were observed with a patchy, red rash. The rash was comprised of small red circles, some raised slightly and some flat. Some areas were observed open with scratch marks and some were intact. The resident stated the rash was related to nerves from her last roommate. She stated, It gets itchy and I think I'm supposed to have some kind of antibiotic cream but no one has put it on. On 12/20/22 at 9:15 a.m., Resident #47 was observed lying in bed, awake. She…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, medical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of 5% or less. There were four errors and 33 opportunities for error, resulting in an error rate of 12.12% and involving two errors for Resident #50, one error for Resident #69, and one error for Resident #28. The findings include: On 12/21/22 at 4:20 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F was observed preparing medications for Resident #50. One of the tablets (Bumex 2 mg (milligrams) was observed to fall onto the medication cart when popped out of the blister pack. LPN F was observed picking up the tablet with an ungloved hand and placing it in the medication cup with another tablet (Coreg 25 mg). LPN F was observed picking up the medication cup and then proceeded to walk toward the resident's room. He was stopped and asked if he was going to give the medication he had dropped and picked up with his ungloved hand to the resident. He stated, Yes, the cart is clean. If I dropped the pill on the floor, I would throw it away and get a new…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that two of 33 sampled residents, Residents #187 and #73, who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. The findings include: 1. On 5/17/2021 at 1:44 pm, Resident #187 was observed in her room with nasal cannula present and an oxygen concentrator administering oxygen at .5 liters per minute. On 5/18/2021 at 10:45 am, Resident #187 was observed in her room sitting in a wheelchair with nasal cannula present. The the oxygen concentrator was administering oxygen at 1 liter per minute. Record review for Resident # 187 revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus; dysphagia; unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance; acute respiratory failure with hypoxia; essential hypertension; anxiety disorder; arteriosclerotic heart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VIVO HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL