Vivo Healthcare Orange Park

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 74 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 41.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2021-05-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident/staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a pressure ulcer, received necessary care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent worsening of the pressure ulcer for one (Resident #75) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcer development, from a total of 35 residents in the sample. The facility failed to reposition the resident to reduce the pressure on her coccyx/sacral area, and failed to provide the resident with a pressure-reducing mattress when the wound was discovered on 05/12/2021. This contributed to worsening of the pressure area from a Stage II to an unstageable wound. The findings include: Resident #75 was observed on 05/24/2021 at 9:30 AM, 10:22 AM, 12:40 PM, 1:45 PM and 2:50 PM. Each time she was in her room, lying in bed on her back. She was on a standard mattress. Resident #75 was observed on 05/25/2021 at 10:05 AM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, facility document review, and the facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care, were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for one (Resident #95) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care, in a total survey sample of 28 residents. Resident #95 did not receive oxygen at the flow rate ordered by his physician. The findings include: On 11/18/24 at 1:10 PM, Resident #95 was observed fully dressed, sitting in his wheelchair inside his doorway communicating with Maintenance Director A in Spanish. His room was approached and the resident's nasal cannula was observed on the floor next to his wheelchair. Maintenance Director A advised Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B that Resident #95's nasal cannula was on the floor. The Director of Nursing (DON) also advised LPN B that Resident #95 needed an oxygen tank for his wheelchair. The oxygen flow rate on the concentrator was set between…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-01-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the kitchen food service observations, staff interviews, facility document review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness with the potential to affect all the residents who consumed foods in the facility. The facility failed to ensure that the dietary staff was trained and knowledgeable about the proper procedures for food storage and proper sanitation practices in the kitchen. Specific instruction on food handling and sanitation is important in health care settings serving nursing home residents. Unsafe food handling practices represent a potential source of pathogen exposure. The findings include: An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) L on 01/03/2023 at 9:55 a.m. During the tour, the bread cart next to the food prep area had four open bundles of bread with no date marking identified. Opened Thick and Easy food and beverage thickener was observed in the dry storage room on the bottom. These observations were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-01-06 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on kitchen food service observations, staff interviews, facility document review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen freezer in a safe operating condition with the potential to place the health of all the residents who consumed foods in the facility at risk. The facility failed to ensure that the dietary staff was trained and knowledgeable about the proper procedures for maintaining essential equipment in the kitchen. Specific instruction on kitchen equipment is important in health care settings serving nursing home residents. Freezer units in disrepair may no longer be capable of properly cooling or holding time/temperature control for safety foods at safe temperatures. The findings include: An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) L on 01/3/2022 at 9:55 a.m. During the tour, observations of the walk-in freezer identified condensation buildup on and around the door area, to include shelves on the right side of freezer door and plastic freezer shields. (Photographic evidence obtained)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to implement a culturally competent, person-centered care plan for the use of assistive devices and a translation/interpreter service for communication, and the correct contact information for the contracted translator services for one (Resident #41) of three residents whose primary language was not English, from a total sample of 33 residents. The staff did not have a way to communicate with Resident #41 except to have her point at things. They relied on her family and staff who spoke her language (if they were available or on duty). The staff was unable to consistently communicate effectively with Resident #41 in a language she understood. Failure to develop and implement the care plan can result in negative health outcomes for the residents. The findings include: On 01/03/2023 at 11:10 AM, Resident #41 was observed lying in bed watching television. When she was greeted, she began to speak in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to ensure a resident's ability to communicate, by failing to provide assistive devices for communication and correct contact information for the contracted translator services for one (Resident #41) of three residents whose primary language was not English, from a total sample of 33 residents. The staff did not have a way to communicate with Resident #41 except to have her point at things. They relied on her family and staff who spoke her language if they were available or on duty. The staff was unable to consistently communicate effectively with Resident #41 in a language she understood. Inability to make her needs known due to a language barrier may result in isolation, depression and unmet needs. The findings include: On 01/03/2023 at 11:10 AM, Resident #41 was observed lying in bed watching television. When she was greeted, she began to speak in French…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that two (Residents #85 and #69) of a sample of 33 residents who were unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for fingernail care and trimming. The findings include: On 01/03/23 at 4:00 pm, Resident #85 was observed sitting up in bed, awake, with the company of two visitors. The visitors identified themselves as the resident's son and daughter-in-law. The family members verbally encouraged the resident to speak up if she had anything to say. Resident #85 presented extremely elongated fingernails on both hands. She stated she had asked staff to trim them several times, but no one had trimmed them. (Photographic evidence obtained) The resident's daughter-in-law proceeded to trim the resident's nails during visit, stating, If no one else is going to do it, then I will. On 01/03/23 at 4:05 pm, Resident #69 was observed lying in bed, awake. The resident showed her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident, family, and staff interviews, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #85) of a sample of 33 residents, received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. The findings include: On 1/3/23 at 4:00 pm, Resident #85 was observed sitting up in her bed, awake. She stated she had asked to have appointments for a rheumatologist. She stated there had been no follow up and no appointments made that she was aware of. A medical record review revealed an order written on 8/24/22 which read: Schedule an appointment with rheumatology for consult. No evidence of this appointment being made or having taken place was found in the medical record. On 01/05/23 at 2:24 pm, Resident #85 was observed sitting up in her wheelchair with her son and daughter-in-law visiting. The resident was asked if she had a rheumatology consult since she was admitted to the facility in May 2022. She stated, No, no one has ever gotten back to me about that. I know I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #50) of 16 residents receiving respiratory treatments, from a total sample of 33 residents, received the correct number of liters of oxygen as ordered by the physician. The findings include: On 01/04/2023 at 10:53 am, Resident #50 was observed lying in bed with her eyes closed wearing a nasal cannula. Resident #50's oxygen concentrator, located at bedside, was set at 3.0 Liters per minute (L/min) with no date to identify a change of tubing. (Photographic evidence obtained) A review of Resident #50's physician's order, dated 01/03/2023, revealed she was to receive oxygen at 2 L/min via nasal cannula every shift for oxygen management to keep her oxygen level >93%. On 01/05/2023 at 10:46 am, a second observation of Resident #50's oxygen concentrator, revealed it was set at 3.0 L/min with no date to identify a change of tubing. (Photographic evidence obtained) A medical record review revealed the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during medication administration for one (Resident #37) of three residents observed during medication administration. This practice has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 93 The findings include: During an observation of medication administration on 01/05/23 at 9:30 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) H was observed preparing and administering medication for Resident #37. LPN H failed to perform hand hygiene prior to preparing the medication, and failed to perform hand hygiene after administering the medications to the resident. On 01/05/23 at 9:45 AM, an interview was conducted with LPN H. He confirmed that hand hygiene was required prior to and after each resident medication administration. He confirmed that he failed to perform hand hygiene during medication administration. He stated he forgot. A review of the facility's policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, with a revised date of 12/2009, revealed on page one, number two, All personnel shall follow the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-05-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to monitor targeted behaviors for residents who were receiving psychotropic medications, and/or failed to monitor for drug-related side effects for four (Residents #25, #72, #330 and #381) of five residents reviewed for the use of psychotropic medications, from a total of 35 residents in the sample. The findings include: 1. A review of Resident #25's medical record revealed an admission date of 3/12/21. Her primary medical diagnosis was quadriplegia. Her cognition was intact, and she required total assistance from staff with activities of daily living (ADLs). A review of Resident #25's physician's orders revealed: An order dated 3/13/21 for bupropion (an antidepressant) 100 mg (milligrams) via g-tube (feeding tube) two times daily for depression. Monitoring of potential side effects related to the use of bupropion did not commence until 5/24/21. A second order, dated 3/13/21, for trazodone (an antidepressant) 50 mg via g-tube at bedtime for depression. Monitoring of potential side effects related to the use of trazodone did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VIVO HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL