Vivo Healthcare Meadows

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

32.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 93.7 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-06-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to implement processes to ensure accurate assessment and supervision of residents who smoke tobacco products to protect each resident's individual's safety and the safety of other residents. The facility failed to comprehensively assess and implement adequate interventions to minimize falls for 1(Resident #71) of 1 resident reviewed for falls. On 6/4/23 staff observed Resident #65 smoking in his room with the oxygen concentrator on. The facility failed to reassess Resident #65's ability to adhere to safe smoking precautions and allowed the resident to keep, and store smoking materials. Resident #65 and other residents who required supervision to smoke were observed smoking unsupervised. The smoking area was observed with an overfilled pole cigarette receptacle and the surrounding area littered with cigarette butts. The floor of a clearly marked nonsmoking area had scattered cigarette butts. Residents observed smoking…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-06-23 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility Administration failed to utilize its resources effectively to ensure safe smoking practices, including assessment and supervision of residents who smoke tobacco products to protect residents from serious injury, impairment, or death. On 6/4/23 staff observed Resident #65 smoking in his room with the oxygen concentrator on. The facility failed to reassess Resident #65's ability to adhere to safe smoking precautions and allowed the resident to keep, and store smoking materials. Resident #65 and other residents who required supervision to smoke were observed smoking unsupervised. The smoking area was observed with an overfilled pole cigarette receptacle and the surrounding area littered with cigarette butts. The floor of a clearly marked nonsmoking area had scattered cigarette butts. Residents observed smoking unsupervised in the nonsmoking area with no ashtray. The facility administration's failure to ensure safe smoking practices created a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident representative and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's refunds were refunded within 30 days after discharge for 1 (Resident #1) of 1 sampled resident due a refund.The findings included:Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #1 had an admission date of 12/9/25 and discharge date of 12/16/25. On 2/10/26 at 9:56 a.m., in a telephone interview the resident's life companion said Resident #1 had been discharged since 12/16/25 and a refund was due to her. He said they spoke with the Administrator the previous week but were still waiting on the money to be refunded.On 2/10/26 at 10:51 a.m., in an interview the Business Office Manager (BOM) said Resident #1 came to the facility as Medicaid pending. She stayed for a few days and decided she didn't want to stay there. The BOM said Resident #1 did not want to provide her information for the Medicaid application and she was advised that they would need to flip her over to private pay. The BOM said Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-23 · tag F0551 — pattern
  Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, records reviewed and facility policy the facility failed to properly exercise the rights of 3, (Resident #5, Resident #3 and Resident #4), of 3 residents with dementia that had designated representatives by disenrolling the residents from their Medicare Advantage coverage without proper authorization and documentation.The findings included:Review of Facility Policy titled Resident Rights implemented 9/1/23 documented the resident has the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. 1) Exercise of Rights: The resident has the right to exercise his or her rights of the facility as a citizen of the United States.b) In the case of a resident who has not been adjudged incompetent by the State court, the resident has a right to designate a representative, in accordance with State law and any legal surrogate so designated may exercise the resident's rights to the extent provided by State law.Review of Facility Enrollment/Disenrollment Rights for Medicare Beneficiaries not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility policy, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to make timely necessary repairs to maintain a safe, functional environment for residents, staff and the public. The findings included: Review of the facility Quality Assurance and Improvement Plan specified, We provide a comprehensive maintenance program that maintains building safety, conducts repairs when needed and performs safety inspections in accordance with State and Federal regulations to ensure the safety and well-being of all residents, visitors and staff. On 10/1/24 at 11:10 a.m., in a telephone interview Resident #103's family member said the facility is located down a dark road near the woods. The family member said the parking lot was dark at night, it was creepy and I didn't feel safe going to my car at night. On 10/2/24 at 8:26 a.m., in an interview the Administrator said several lights were out in the parking area and facility grounds. He said the lightbulbs were scheduled to be replaced last week but it was canceled due to the pending hurricane. The Administrator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility policy and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to eradicate and contain common household pests. The findings included: The facility's Pest Control Program policy revised 8/24 documented It is the policy of the facility to maintain an effective pest control program that eradicates and contains common household pests and rodents. On 9/30/24 at 10:43 a.m., in an interview Resident #45 said she had seen bugs, black and medium sized crawling on the walls at night. The resident said, The man comes in and sprays, but it does not do the job. I have told the nurses several times. He sprays on the floor, but the bugs climb the walls, so it does not stop them. On 9/30/24 at 11:00 a.m., in the back hall of the lobby a medium brown bug was observed on it's back. Photographic evidence obtained. On 10/1/24 at 10:24 a.m., in an interview Resident #63 said she had seen large bugs in her room. She said, They come in from under the air-conditioning unit over there. They climb on the walls and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment accurately reflected the status for 2 (Resident #78 and Resident #105) of 32 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The Findings Included: The Resident Assessment - RAI Policy provided by the facility with an October 2024 Revised date stated, This facility makes a comprehensive assessment of each resident's needs, strengths, goals, life history and preferences using the resident assessment instrument (RAI) specified by CMS . The current version of the RAI (MDS 3.0) will be utilized when conducting a comprehensive assessment of each resident in accordance with the instructions found in the RAI Manual . The assessment process will include direct observation and communication with the resident, as well as communication with licensed and non-licensed direct care staff members on all shifts . On 9/30/24 at 1:15 p.m., Resident #78 was observed dressed and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to update the care plan and implement physician ordered interventions to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for 1 (Resident #42) of 2 residents reviewed with limited mobility. The findings included: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included difficulty walking, muscle weakness, reduced mobility and compression fracture of the vertebra. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with a target date of 4/25/24 noted Resident #42 was dependent (Helper does all of the effort, Resident does none of the effort) to roll left and right, sit to lying, and lying to sitting on the side of the bed. Resident #42 had no pressure ulcer but was at risk of developing pressure ulcers. The Quarterly MDS assessment with a target date of 7/26/24 noted Resident #42's cognition was intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14. Review of the physician's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility policy and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #11) of 5 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). The findings included: The facility policy Activities of Daily Living (revised 1/24) documented The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's abilities in ADL's do not deteriorate unless deterioration in unavoidable. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #11's diagnoses included major depressive disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia, and mood disorder. The care plan initiated 6/7/21 documented Resident #11 had an ADL selfcare performance deficit as evidenced by need for assist with self-care. The interventions instructed The resident requires assist x 1 staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
  Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of facility's policy and procedure and staff interviews the facility failed to provide or obtain dental services to meet the needs of 1 (Resident #78) of 1 resident observed with multiple broken, carious teeth. The findings included: The facility's policy for Dental Services reviewed/revised January 2024 noted it was the policy of this facility to assist residents in obtaining routine (to the extent covered under the State plan) and emergency dental care. Routine dental services means an annual inspection of the oral cavity for signs of disease, diagnosis of dental disease, dental radiographs as needed, dental cleaning, fillings (new and repairs) . smoothing of broken teeth . The dental needs of each resident are identified through the physical assessment and MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment process and are addressed in each resident's plan of care. Oral/dental status shall be documented according to assessment findings. Referrals to . dental provider shall be made as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that within 30 days of discharge, eviction or death, residents personal funds and a final accounting is provided to the individual or probate jurisdiction administering the estate for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed discharged mid month. The findings included: On 4/1/24 at 9:53 a.m., Resident #1's son said his mother passed away on January 13, 2024. He said he had still not received a refund from the facility. Resident #1's son said he spoke with someone he believed to be corporate in New Jersey approximately 5 weeks earlier who told him the refund was approved but they were waiting for the check to be cut. Resident #'1's son said he had not yet received a check and had heard nothing since. On 4/1/24 at 1:33 p.m., the Administrator said if a Resident is discharged or passed away, the business office has to issue a refund from that date to the end of the month. He explained the request for refund is handled at the facility but the disbursement is by a third party company. On 4/1/24 at 2:17 p.m., the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 resident reviewed who returned to facility from the hospital. The findings included: On 4/1/24 at 9:53 a.m., Resident #1's son said his mother had been at the hospital and when she returned to the facility in January, he did not believe she was getting all her medications. He said his mother passed away on January 13, 2024. Review of Resident #1's chart revealed she was a long term care resident who had been sent out to the hospital and returned to the facility on 1/9/24. Physician progress note dated 1/9/24 indicated discuss case with nursing staff and continue with meds: Gabapentin (anticonvulsant and nerve pain medication), Nitroglycerin sublingual (treats chest pain), Breo Elipta and Ipratropium-Albuterol (inhaler), Protonix (treats reflux), Tegretol (treats seizures and nerve pain), Carbidopa-Levadopa (treats tremors), Pramipexole Dihydrochloride (treats tremors), Amantadine (anti viral),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VIVO HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL