Vivo Healthcare Sebring

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 131 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 88.4 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety, related to label and dating opened items, discarding items that were expired and not discarding items covered in bio-growth, in one of one walk-in cooler. Findings Included: During an observation of the walk-in cooler on 04/13/2026 at 10:53 a.m. the following was observed: A box of individually wrapped butter was found open, with butter smeared on the box and at least two of the individually wrapped blocks were open, exposing the butter. The box and the individual blocks were not dated/labeled. A produce box containing green bell peppers. Inside the box were approximately a dozen peppers with black circles on the surface that had a fuzzy black and white bio growth, and two of the peppers had a fuzzy white blue/green substance on the pepper. A produce box containing approximately 10 heads of cabbage. The cabbage heads had black spots all over the circumference of the head.A box of turkey franks that was open, exposing the franks. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than five percent. A total of twelve medication administration opportunities were observed with four errors for two (#4 and #5) of four residents sampled for medication administration, which resulted in a medication administration error rate of 33.33%. Findings included: A review of Resident #4's medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hypertension and nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage. A review of Resident #4's physician orders revealed the following orders: - An order dated 4/23/2024 for levetiracetam 1000 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth (PO) every 12 hours at 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM for seizures. - An order dated 5/10/2024 for metoprolol tartrate 50 mg one tablet PO two times a day at 8:00 AM and 9:00 PM for hypertension. An observation of medication administration was conducted on 9/3/2024 at 9:12 AM with Staff A, Licensed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-20 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I for three residents (#63, #56 and #30) of twenty four sampled residents were revised for accuracy to include diagnoses recognized at the time of admission and later identified. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #63's admission Record revealed an original admission date of 11/23/23 and a readmission date of 4/23/24. The admission Record showed diagnoses to include anxiety disorder as of 2/26/24 and depression as of 2/26/24. Review of Resident #63's medical record revealed a PASARR Level I, dated 11/23/23, and new one completed on 4/16/24. The PASARR Level 1 completed on 4/16/24 did not include the diagnoses of anxiety and depression in Section 1 A MI (mental illness) or suspected MI. Review of the Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], revealed: Section C - Cognitive Patterns a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, indicating severe impairment. Section I -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure behavior monitoring for psychotropic medication was in place for five residents (#32, #56, #59, #63 and #65) and failed to appropriately monitor the side effects for psychotropic medication for one resident (#56) of seven sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #56's admission Record revealed an original admission date of 8/16/22 and a readmission date of 10/2/23. The admission Record showed diagnoses to include other stimulant abuse, generalized anxiety disorder, persistent mood (affective) disorder, binge eating disorder, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], revealed: Section C - Cognitive Patterns a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Section E - Behaviors showed no behaviors were exhibited. Section N - Medications showed the resident was taking antianxiety antidepressant medications. Observation on 5/18/24 at 12:27 p.m.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 5/20/2024 at 3:38 p.m. an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] B revealed a can of activICE (over the counter topical pain reliever) sitting on the table next to the bathroom door. The cap was missing. The resident in the room stated it was hers but she can't use it anymore because the spray top is missing due to falling on the floor. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide an environment that was clean, safe, and sanitary for residents on one units (B Wing) of two units and two shower rooms (A Wing and B Wing) of two shower rooms. Findings included: On 5/20/24 starting at 3:00 p.m., observations were made of the resident rooms and shower rooms on the A Wing and B Wing. The following was observed: - A wheelchair in hallway across from the activity room with a ball of an unknown pink substance stuck to the seat of the chair and armrests that were ripped revealing foam interior. The was observed on 5/18/24, 5/19/24 and 5/20/24. - An observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] Bed A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to assess two residents (#73 and #178) out of twenty-eight sampled residents for the self-administration of medications and to ensure the self-administered medications were safely stored. Findings included: 1. On 5/18/24 at 12:14 p.m. Resident #73 was observed and interviewed in the resident's room. The observation revealed an allergy nasal spray bottle, 3 vials of an unknown type of eye drop and a medication bottle with a green top sitting on top of the bedside dresser underneath the resident's computer monitor. The resident reported having a lot of environmental allergies and the nasal spray was Fluticasone. Review of Resident #73's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. The record revealed diagnoses not limited to sequela unspecified fracture of right femur, unspecified rheumatoid arthritis, and history of falling. The admission Record showed the resident suffered from almond, bread, tree, and shrub pollen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodations were made to ensure one resident (#29) of twenty four sampled residents was provided the right sized incontinent supplies. Findings included: An interview was conducted with Resident #29 on 5/18/24 at 11:52 a.m. in her room while she was in bed. She stated for the last two weeks she hasn't been able to get medium size pull ups. She said, That is what I always wear. Right now I'm wearing small youth and they are tight. I have severe diarrhea and these are so tight. She confirmed she has told staff members but could not recall their names. Review of the admission Record for Resident #29 revealed her most recent admission to the facility was 2/28/23 with diagnoses to include depression, anxiety, muscle wasting and atrophy, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness and need for assistance with personal care. Review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/27/24, revealed in Section C- Cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a care plan had been developed and implemented for one resident (#70) out of one resident sampled for respiratory services. Findings included: On 5/18/24 at 12:31 p.m. Resident #70 was observed lying in bed with a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine on the bedside dresser next to the resident. The tubing and cannula attached to the machine were lying on top of it. The resident reported staff do not clean it, did not have anything to clean it with, and she would do it when she discharged to home. On 5/19/24 at 9:27 a.m. Resident #70 was observed lying in bed with the CPAP tubing and cannula sitting on top of the machine. Review of Resident #70's physician orders revealed an order for Bipap to be on every night at 129 setting, started on 3/19/24. The orders did not include an order to clean the equipment after resident use. Review of Resident #70's care plan, on 5/18/24 at 2:19 p.m., revealed no care plan related to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan related to dialysis services for one resident (#45) of two residents sampled for dialysis. Findings included: Review of the admission Record for Resident #45 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Record revealed diagnoses of end stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the active physician orders for May 2024 revealed and order for Dialysis - [Name of Dialysis Center, address and phone number] [name of transport company] transport chair time 0630 (a.m.)/PU (pick up) time 5:30-6a (a.m.) on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday, 5/2/24 start. During an interview with Resident #45 on 5/18/24 at 12:54 p.m. he stated he goes to dialysis three times a week on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturdays. Review of the active care plan, initiated 2/22/23 and revised 11/20/23, revealed a Focus for renal failure with dialysis T/Th/S (Tuesday/Thursday/Saturday) at [name of dialysis center].…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to assess altered skin conditions and provide wound care according to facility protocol, physician orders, and professional standards for two residents (#15 and #71) out of two residents sampled for non-pressure related skin conditions. Findings included: 1. On 5/18/24 at 10:30 a.m. Resident #15 was observed sitting in the hallway between the two units of the facility. An undated white 2x2 bordered dressing stained with a red substance was observed on the resident's right ankle and a whitish/gray 2x2 bordered dressing dated 5/16/24 was observed on the resident's left ankle. The resident allowed photographic evidence to be obtained. On 5/18/24 at 3:04 p.m. Resident #15 was observed with the same dressings on each lower extremity. On 5/19/24 at 9:01 a.m. Resident #15 was observed with an undated 2x2 white bordered dressing stained with reddish-brown drainage on the right ankle. The observation revealed a dated 2x2 grayish-white dressing on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VIVO HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $108K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL