Vivo Healthcare Winter Haven
2701 Lake Alfred Rd, Winter Haven, FL 33881 · For profit - Individual · 120 certified beds · (863) 298-5000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.9% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.2% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.0% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 2.5% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.4% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.3% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.0% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.3% | 10.5% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.8% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 61.7% | 94.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 35.7% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.2% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.99 | 2.13 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.53 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
34.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 27.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 77 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 34.3%CMS range 22.1–53.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 8.3–15.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 27.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 31.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 16.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.9%CMS range 5.0–14.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.03 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 104.8 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-10 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to submit the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) staffing data for the first quarter in the Fiscal Year 2025. Findings Included: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) PBJ Staffing data report Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER Report 1705D) revealed there was no facility staffing data submitted for the period of October 1 to December 31 (FY Quarter 1 2025). During an interview on 04/10/2025 at 10:05 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated he had nothing to do with PBJ and was not aware they had triggered for not reporting PBJ data for Quarter 1. He stated they used a third party company who submitted their PBJ staffing hours. He stated he could pull the [NAME] report to view the hours but rarely looks at it. The facility did not have a policy or procedure on the expectaions of reporting PBJ staffing hours.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to developed and implemented action plans to correct identified quality deficiencies; measure the success of actions implemented and track performance to ensure improvements are realized and sustained, track medical errors and adverse events, analyze their causes, and implement preventive actions and mechanisms, conduct at least one Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) annually that focuses on high-risk or problem prone areas, identified by the facility, through data collection and analysis, and did not ensure the QAA Committee regularly reviews and analyzes data collected under the QAPI program and resulting from drug regimen reviews, and act on the data to make improvements. The Findings Included; Record review of the facility's policies and procedures titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement dated 9/2023 revealed: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement an effective infection control program related to 1.) initiating contact precautions for one resident (#154) of one resident suspected and treated for a highly contagious condition, 2.) failed to clean shared equipment appropriately and store it in a sanitary manner, and 3.) failed to promote good hand hygiene by limiting the length of fingernails of direct care staff. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #154's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. The record revealed diagnoses of diverticulosis of large intestine without perforation or abscess without bleeding. Review of Resident #154's Medication Administration Record on 4/7/25 at 3:30 p.m. revealed the following: - Saccharomyces boulardii - 2 capsules by mouth two times a day for gastrointestinal (GI) support for 14 days, started on 4/2/25. - Flagyl 500 milligram (mg) - Give 500 mg by mouth three times a day for possible C-diff (Clostridioides…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to establish an effective antibiotic stewardship program related to the antibiotic use protocols and monitoring the use of antibiotics. Findings included: Review of February 2025's Infection Control Log, 2/1 to 2/28/25, showed the facility had a total of 7 infections effecting 7 residents for the month. The log revealed the facility had 3 Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs), one mouth, one eye, one acute kidney injury, and one leg cellulitis infections. Five of the infections listed did not include an onset date, two of the UTIs were cultured with no information related to culturing for three of the infections (yes or no), two of the three UTIs had organisms listed, five of the list did not show whether the infection required isolation or not or if they were Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI). Six of the seven infections did not show a resolution date. The section of the log used to document the total number of infections (skin, eye, UTI with catheter, Urinary Tract, Upper Respiratory, Lower Respiratory,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances for Resident Council for 3 of 5 months reviewed and two (#19 and #69) of 52 total residents sampled. Findings included: 1. Review of the Resident Council Minutes dated November 18, 2024 showed: New Business: Current Situation Weekend Call lights long response time 11-7 and Customer Service. Review of Resident Council Minutes dated 2/12/205 showed: New Business: Current Situation To long to answer call lights 11-7. Review of Resident Council Minutes dated 3/13/2025 showed: New Business: Current Situation call lights. During the Resident Council Meeting on 4/8/25 at 2:30 p.m., Resident Council stated call lights and staff assistance continue to be a problem, especially on evenings and weekends. A review of the Grievance Logs from November 2024 to March 2025, revealed an absence of grievance issue concern on behalf of the Resident Council. An interview was conducted on 4/8/25 at 3:49 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate Pre-admisson Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) screenings for eight residents (#2, # 67, #64, #83, #57, #26, #20, and #81) out of 52 residents sampled. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #2's admission record revealed an admission date of 03/16/2024, with diagnoses to include Other Bipolar Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Single Episode, Unspecified. Review of Resident #2's Level I PASRR, dated 03/15/2025, showed the Level I PASRR was missing diagnoses including Bipolar Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. A rescreen was not perfomred by the facility to include these diagnosis and assess if a Level II screen wuld be needed. 2. Review of Resident #81's admission Record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE], 9/3/24, and 2/10/25. The record revealed the resident's primary diagnosis with an onset date of 8/15/24 was unspecified Alzheimer's disease, other diagnoses included: unspecified dementia unspecified severity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the comprehensive person-centered care plans for three (#26, #38, and #7) of 52 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. An observation on 04/07/2025 at 10:25 a.m revealed Resident #38 sitting in his room in his bed. The head of the bed was elevated. His un-bagged nebulizer mask was laying on the overbed table. The nebulizer machine was off. He stated the nurse brought in medicine for his machine and left. Resident #38 stated he took it off after it was finished. He stated the nurse did not stay with him. An observation on 04/07/2025 at 11:26 a.m revealed Resident #38's un-bagged nebulizer was still laying on the overbed table. An observation on 04/08/25 at 8:58 a.m., revealed Resident #38 was sitting in bed with the head of the bed elevated. The nebulizer mask was in a plastic bag on the overbed table. The oxygen concentrator was set at 3.5 liters per minute. An observation on 04/09/2025 at 10:30 a.m., revealed Resident #38 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide grooming assistance of shaving facial hair for four (#5, #14, #33, #46) of six residents sampled for activities of daily living (ADL). Findings included: 1. On 04/08/25 at 02:35 PM, Resident #5 was observed in Resident Council meeting with several white hairs about ¼ inch in length on her chin. During an interview on 04/08/25 at 05:07 PM, Resident #5 stated she did not like the facial hair and hoped the facility would assist in removal. The resident stated they don't ask me. Review of the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) ADL task report for Resident #5 for the month of April 2025 revealed documentation did not reflect any instances of this resident refusing care and showed ADL care was provided. Review of Resident #5's care plan dated 1/25/25 revealed Resident #5 required supervision or touching assistance with personal and oral hygiene and partial moderate assistance on bathing/showering. 2. On 04/07/25 at 10:20 AM, Resident #14 was sleeping in bed with two patches of approximately ½ inch gray hair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective resident call system in four resident rooms (#204, #207, #403, and #609) of sixty four resident rooms in the facility Findings included: On [DATE] at 12:40 p.m. and [DATE] at 9:50 a.m., the following observations were made. a. The bathroom in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with no call light pull string. b. The bathroom in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with no call light pull string. c. The bathroom in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with no call light pull string. d. The bathroom in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with no call light pull string. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on [DATE] at 2:53 p.m., the NHA stated he was notified of the broken call light pull strings in room [ROOM NUMBER], #207, #403, and #609. On [DATE] at 11:08 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Maintenance (DOM). The DOM said he walks the facility daily and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the resident's right to a dignified existence and self-determination by failing to serve identifiable foods for two (#67 and #38) of two residents sampled for pureed diets. Finding included: 1. Resident #67 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the admission Record showed diagnoses included but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, and adult failure to thrive. An observation on 04/07/2025 at 12:48 p.m. revealed Resident #67 being assisted by an unidentified staff to eat her pureed diet. Resident #67's meal ticket was lying on her tray. The meal ticket did not show the food items she was eating. During the observation and interview the staff member assisting her to eat stated they did not know what the pureed items were. They stated it may have been spaghetti or pasta and peas. Review of the menu for the day showed on 04/07/2025 for lunch the residents received spaghetti sauce with meatballs,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders, assess the residents or develop care plans for two (#38 and #89) of two residents related to self-medicating for nebulizer treatments. Findings included: 1. An observation on 04/07/2025 at 10:25 a.m revealed Resident #38 sitting in his room in his bed. The head of the bed was elevated. His un-bagged nebulizer mask was laying on the overbed table. The nebulizer machine was off. He stated the nurse brought in medicine for his machine and left. Resident #38 stated he took it off after it was finished. He stated the nurse did not stay with him. An observation on 04/07/2025 at 11:26 a.m revealed Resident #38's un-bagged nebulizer was still laying on the overbed table. An observation on 04/08/25 at 8:58 a.m., revealed Resident #38 was sitting in bed with the head of the bed elevated. The nebulizer mask was in a plastic bag on the overbed table. An observation on 04/09/2025 at 10:30 a.m., revealed Resident #38 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide notification to the resident representative for one of six residents (Resident #106) sampled for accidents out of a total sample of 52 residents. Findings Included: Review of Resident #106's admission Record showed an admission date of 07/11/2024, discharge date of 07/16/2024 to an acute care hospital, and diagnoses to include urinary tract infection, osteoporosis, leukemia, hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, muscle wasting and atrophy, difficulty walking, and repeated falls. Resident #106 had three family members listed as emergency contacts on the admission Record. Review of the Change in Condition Evaluation dated 07/15/2024 at 2:43 a.m. showed Resident #106 fell on [DATE] at 2:20 a.m. Section 3. Resident/Representative Notification was blank. Review of the progress notes showed no documentation the family was called post fall on 07/15/2024. Review of the Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendations (SBAR) dated 07/16/2024 showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to revise the care plans and related interventions accurately for one residents (#93) of fifty-two sampled residents related to indwelling urinary catheter. Findings included: Review of Resident #93's care plan revealed the following focuses and relevant interventions: - Enhanced Barrier Precautions related to (r/t) indwelling urinary catheter (and) wound. The focus was initiated on 1/27/25 and revised on 4/7/25. - Has a[n] [indwelling] Catheter. Diagnosis (DX) wounds. The focus was initiated on 1/15/25 and revised on 4/9/25. The goal was for the resident to remain free from catheter-related trauma through review date. On 4/7/25 at 11:28 a.m., Resident #93 was observed lying in bed. No urinary catheter was observed. During an interview on 4/8/25 at 5:43 p.m., Resident #93 reported not having a urinary catheter and stated it came out on its own about 3 weeks ago. The nurse at the time was going to put it back but needed a 16 French (fr) sized catheter, but only had a 14 fr available and did not have an order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess, document and/or treat a surgical wound for one (#96) of one resident sampled for skin conditions. Findings included: On 4/7/25 at 5:10 p.m., Resident #96 was observed with a blue cast on his right arm and a mesh pad covering a black area approximately 2 centimeters (cm) x 3 cm on his interior left ankle. The mesh was lifted off the skin in one corner. The resident stated the doctor did not want it to come off and it had been there for about a month. Review of Resident #96's admission Record revealed the resident had been admitted on [DATE] and included diagnoses not limited to unspecified fracture of right femur subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, stress fracture right ankle subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, and multiple sites muscle wasting and atrophy not elsewhere classified. Review of Resident #96's Admission/readmission Nursing Evaluation, effective 2/7/25, showed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a contracture management program to include wearing of splints/orthotics was implemented for one (#7) of fifty - two sampled residents during three of three days observed (4/7/2025, 4/8/2025, and 4/9/2025). Findings included: On 4/7/2025 from10:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. Resident #7 was observed in her room lying in bed with both of her upper extremities noted to be contracted. Both of her hands and fingers were in a closed position. Resident #7 was not observed wearing either splints or orthotics. There were no splints or orthotics visible in the room during the multiple visits. Resident #7 was not able to answer any questions related to her medical care and services as she was observed with cognitive deficits. On 4/7/25 at 1:00 p.m. an interview was conducted with Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). Staff C confirmed she had Resident #7 on her assignment for the day and that she did not know the resident well. Staff C was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were in place for one (Resident #19) of two residents sampled for a Foley catheter. Findings included: A review of admission record revealed Resident #19 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, quadriplegia, resistance to multiple antibiotics, carrier of other enterobacterales and other co-morbidities. A review of Resident #19's care plan revealed the following: Focus: Resident #19 Urinary catheter r/t (related to) Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder Date Initiated: 04/04/2024 Revision on: 02/22/2025. Interventions included: Change catheter as needed Date Initiated: 04/13/2024; Foley Catheter as ordered Date Initiated: 04/13/2024 Revision on: 04/07/2025; Observe/document for pain/discomfort due to catheter Date Initiated: 04/04/2024; Observe/record/report to MD for s/sx (signs/symptoms) (Urinary Track Infection) UTI - pain, burning, blood-tinged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to identify, implement, monitor, and modify interventions for one (Resident #33) out of 52 related to coughing during meals. Findings Included: During an observation on 04/07/2025 at 12:18 p.m., Resident #33 was observed sitting in the dining room with a plate of spaghetti, meatballs and garlic toast. Resident #33's eyes became watery and was observed coughing after taking a bite of food. Resident #33 continued to cough for a few seconds when staff approached Resident #33 raised her hands and removed the plate of spaghetti and toast. During an interview on 04/07/2025 at 1:19 p.m., Resident #33's Family Member (FM) stated that she had had an issue with the facility not assisting the resident with eating. She stated the resident had had issues with chewing her food and was supposed to be on a pureed diet. She stated the last time the resident went to the hospital and came back to the facility, she brought up that the resident needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for two residents (#38 and #26) of four residents sampled and failed to ensure respiratory equipment was stored appropriately for two residents (#14 and #89) of four sampled residents. Findings included: 1. An observation was conducted on 4/7/2025 at 10:25 a.m. of Resident #38 sitting in bed with an oxygen nasal cannula in place in his nose. The oxygen concentrator set to 3.5 liters/minute. An observation was conducted on 4/8/2025 at 8:58 a.m. of Resident #38 sitting in bed with an oxygen nasal cannula in place in his nose. The oxygen concentrator set to 3.5 liters/minute. An observation was conducted on 4/9/2025 at 10:30 a.m. of Resident #38 sitting in bed with an oxygen nasal cannula in place in his nose. The oxygen concentrator set to 1.5 liters/minute. A review of Resident #38's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide behavioral health care services to one (#36) of three residents reviewed for mood and behaviors. Findings Included: During an observation on 04/07/2025 at 10:45 a.m., Resident #36 was heard from the nurse's station yelling out. During an observation on 04/08/2025 at 9:23 a.m., Resident #36 was observed hitting her leg and yelling out. Resident #36 was unable to answer any questions regarding her care. Review of Resident #36's admission record revealed she was originally admitted in 2018, most recently admitted in June of 2024, and had diagnoses to include Vascular Dementia, Unspecified Severity, Without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, And Anxiety, Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Disturbance of Emotions And Conduct, Other Specified Persistent Mood Disorders, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, Dysarthria following Cerebral Infarction, Aphasia, and Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal Phase. Review of Resident #36's Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure physician orders for medications with parameters were followed for two (#29 and #11) out of two residents reviewed. Findings included: 1. On 6/03/2025 at 10:05 a.m. an observation and interview was conducted with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) during medication administration for Resident #29. Staff A, LPN stated she will make a call to the physician to inform the physician of the late administration of medication for the resident. Staff A, LPN took Resident #29's blood pressure and obtained a result of 111/68 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Staff A pulled Lisinopril 2.5 milligrams (mg) from the medication cart and administered the medication. A record review of Resident #29's admission Record showed an admission date of 6/14/2019 with diagnoses to include but not limited to essential hypertension. A record review of Resident #29's physician orders showed an order dated 5/25/2025 for Lisinopril 2.5 mg to give one tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension, hold if systolic blood pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to maintain accurately documented medical records for vital signs, medication, and indwelling catheters for two (#98, #93) of 52 total sampled residents. Findings included: 1. On 4/8/25 at 4:06 p.m., Resident #98 was observed with Staff Q, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) during the administration of medication. Review of Resident #98's April 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed a physician order for staff to monitor vital signs every shift. Review of the MAR documentation showed: - Identical vital signs on 4/1/25 evening and night shift of 132/72 blood pressure (bp), 97.3 temperature (temp), 72 pulse, 17 respiratory rate (resp), and 98% oxygen saturation rate (O2 sats). - Identical vital signs on 4/2/25 night shift and 4/3/25 evening and night shift of 122/88 bp, 97.6 temp, 77 pulse, 18 resp, and 97% O2 sats. - Identical vital signs on 4/4/25 day, evening, and night shift and 4/5/25 evening shift of 118/68 bp, 97.1 temp, 65 pulse, 19 resp, and 96% O2 sats. - Identical vital signs on 4/5/25 night…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment in 16 out of 52 resident rooms and in three Wings/Common areas (100, 400 and 600) of six Wings toured. Findings included: On 4/8/2025 at 12:40 p.m., 4/9/2025 at 09:50 a.m., and on 4/10/2025 at 10:10 a.m. the following was observed: Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with bio growth on the ceiling at the fire sprinkler head. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with a brown, rough surface over the toilet seat. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with a brown, rough surface over the toilet seat. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with bio growth on the ceiling at the fire sprinkler head. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with unfinished walls near the TV and bio growth on the ceiling at the fire sprinkler head. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed without a call light pulling string in the bathroom. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Forty-one medication administration opportunities were observed, and fourteen errors were identified for four residents (#40, #98, #93, and #53) of six residents observed. These errors constituted a 34.15% medication error rate. Findings included: 1. On [DATE] at 8:24 a.m. an observation of medication administration with Staff P, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was conducted with Resident #40. The staff member searched medication cart for a bottle of Calcium 500 milligram(mg) tablets. Staff P went to the central supply office cupboard and retrieved an over-the counter bottle before revealing the bottle was Calcium with Vitamin D and not the medication the resident was ordered. The staff member proceeded to dispense the following: - Carvedilol 3.125 mg tablet - Furosemide 40 mg tablet - Jardiance 10 mg tablet - Lisinopril 40 mg tablet Staff P confirmed dispensing four (4) tablets prior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control management system in nine rooms (100, 103, 108, 106, 207, 210, 303, 410, and 604) out of 52 rooms toured, and for one resident (#78) of one resident sampled. Findings included: On 4/9/2025 at 12:45 p.m. and on 04/10/2025 at 10:10 a.m., observations were made of live crawling bugs and what appeared to be insect feces in resident rooms and common areas. The rooms included rooms 100, 103, 108, 106, 207, 210, 303, 410, and 604, and common areas of the 400 Wing. On 4/7/2025 at 11:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). She stated she had seen pests throughout the entire facility. On 4/10/2025 at 11:08 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Maintenance (DOM). The DOM said, he walked the facility daily and if he saw an issue he resolved it immediately or entered it into the electronic maintenance work order system. The staff also entered issues into an electronic maintenance work order system, and he reviewed the system…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to reconcile, obtain, and provide medications as ordered, for two residents (#105 and #53) of five residents sampled for admissions/readmissions. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #105's admission Record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. The primary admitting diagnosis was other seizures, with other diagnoses of unspecified benign neoplasm of brain, epileptic seizures related to external causes not intractable without status epilepticus, myasthenia gravis without (acute) exacerbation, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident #105's Admission/readmission Nursing Evaluation, dated 11/19/24 at 4:08 a.m., revealed the resident's medications and physician orders had been reviewed and the resident had arrived via stretcher from a hospital for seizure activity and pain history (hx) left shoulder Arthropathy. The evaluation did not reveal an order had been received from the physician to administer medications when they became…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to provide an environment that was clean, sanitary, and well-maintained related to lack of housekeeping three halls (100, 400 and 600) of six halls affecting 12 resident rooms (604, 609, 101, 103, 102, 104, 400, 404, 406, 408, 411, 412 ), two storage areas (600-hall oxygen room, clean utility room) and broken handrails located in the hallway across from the therapy room and the dining room, and failed to ensure the ceiling was free and a black like substance and in good repair in one of one kitchen. Findings included: 1. An observation on 7/10/23 at 9:53 a.m. of the 600-hall oxygen room revealed under an empty oxygen rack dirt and mulch-looking material and behind the door was piles of dead ants intermixed with dust. On 7/10/23 at 10:01 a.m., an observation was conducted in the bathroom for Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. The observation revealed a black biofilm along the floor and in the corner of the shower, the light above the shower was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility 1) failed to ensure staff appropriately donned Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) prior to entering isolation rooms for two residents (#74 and #561) out of two residents on Contact Precautions, and 2) failed to ensure staff were educated on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) on two hallways (400 and 100) out of six hallways in the facility, 3) failed to implement proper PPE during wound care for one resident (#105) out of one wound care observation, and 4) failed to ensure staff followed proper infection control practices related to nail care during medication administration. Findings included: 1) On 7/12/2023 at 10:30 a.m. an Enhanced Barrier Precautions sign was observed on Resident #74's room door and no PPE caddy available to staff. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) On 07/12/23 at 11:06 a.m. an interview was conducted with Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). Staff H, LPN stated she was informed during her nurse-to-nurse communication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control system was in place in four halls (100, 200, 400 and 600) of six halls and one resident (#60) who resided in one of the affected halls. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Pest Control, revised date: 2/2023, revealed: It is the policy of this facility to maintain an effective pest control program that eradicates and contains common household pests and rodents. Effective pest control program is defined as measures to eradicate and contain common household pests (e.g., bed bugs, lice, roaches, ants, mosquitos, flies, mice and rats). During multiple facility tours, observations were made of live and dead pests and flying insects in resident rooms and storage areas as follows: 1. On 7/10/23 at 10:04 a.m. in the bathroom of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] an observation revealed dead and live cockroaches near the toilet and shower drain. On 7/10/23 at 10:10 a.m. in the bathroom of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure one resident (#28) was assessed and determined to be clinically appropriate and safe to self-administer medications of two residents sampled for self-administration of medications. Findings included: An observation on 07/10/23 at 10:44 a.m., showed four pills in a medication cup placed on Resident #28's bedside table. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) During an interview on 07/10/23 at 10:46 a.m., Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated Resident #28 did not have the ability to self-administer medications. Staff A, LPN identified the four pills as Norvasc, Lisinopril, Zoloft, and Namenda. Staff A, LPN stated the facility protocol for medication administration was for the nurse to watch a resident take their medications before walking away. Staff A, LPN stated she did not normally leave pills at bedside for residents to self-administer medication, but she had gotten sidetracked by another resident this morning and left Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and resident record review, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodations were made for one resident (#74) related to not providing an appropriate length mattress to ensure the resident's feet did not touch the footboard of six residents sampled. Findings included: During an observation and interview conducted on 7/10/23 at 9:55 a.m. Resident #74 said his feet frequently touch the footboard. Resident #74 stated staff need to reposition me although even with the knees raised, I slide right back down. I am 6'7; they don't have a bed for my height. When I requested a longer mattress, I was given this bed and was told this is the longest they have, it will have to do. On 7/10/23 at 12:20 p.m. Resident #74 was observed in his bed sitting up and eating his lunch. His feet were touching the footboard and his heels were not supported by the mattress as there was a gap of approximately 7 ½ inches. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) During an interview with Resident #74 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to transmit two comprehensive assessments for one resident (#96) out of two residents sampled for the task of Resident Assessments. Findings included: A review of Resident #96's Minimum Data Set (MDS) information identified a Modification of Entry assessment, dated 2/10/23, was Export Ready, the status of the original Entry assessment was modified and the Modification of admission assessment, dated 2/16/23, was Export Ready. The original admission assessment status was modified. The Discharge Return Not Anticipated assessment, dated 2/28/23 was accepted. On 7/13/23 at 11:26 a.m., during an interview Staff C, MDS Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated they had some issues and couldn't transmit (at that time). The staff member stated both modifications should have been sent and Resident #96's assessments were missed. The policy titled, MDS 3.0 Completion and Transmission, dated 4/5/23, showed Residents are assessed, using a comprehensive assessment process, in order to identify care needs and to develop an interdisciplinary care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded for two residents (Resident #74 and #77) of fourteen sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #74 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic pulmonary edema, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure and history of COVID-19 (coronavirus disease of 2019). An observation on 7/10/23 at 10:00 a.m. revealed Resident #74 with a non-invasive mechanical ventilator (BiPAP [bilevel positive airway pressure]/CPAP[continuous positive airway pressure]) at his bedside. During an interview on 7/11/22 at 3:00 p.m., Resident #74 stated he has had the BiPAP since his hospital stay. Resident #74 stated he had significant breathing problems that included having a tracheostomy (surgical opening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to confirm the accuracy of a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review and failed to correct the document for three residents (#10, #105, and #36) out of forty-seven residents sampled when mental illness or suspected mental illness diagnoses were identified and added to the resident's medical diagnoses . Findings included: 1. A review of Resident #10's admission Record indicated an original admission date of 4/2/18 and a recent re-admission date of 3/23/23. The census list for the resident identified additional admission dates of 9/28/18 and 12/14/19. A Preadmission Screening and Resident Review, Level I Screen for Resident #10, dated 4/2/18, indicated N/A in sections A. Mental Illness (MI) or suspected MI and B. Intellectual Disability (ID) or suspected ID. Section II: Other indications for PASRR (PASARR) Screen Decision-Making identified the resident had no indications. Section IV indicated the resident may be admitted to a Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure two residents (#93 and #461) of three residents sampled for skin impairments received wound care in accordance with professional standards related to changing dressings as ordered and documented and failed to assess and document skin conditions. Findings included: 1. An observation was conducted on 7/10/23 at 12:27 p.m. of Resident #93 lying in bed, the resident stated the bed sheets were piled. The observation identified an area of rolled gauze, dated 6/27/23, on the right upper arm and a white bordered dressing, dated 7/1/23, on the left knee. On 7/10/23 at 12:39 p.m., Staff P, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) observed Resident #93's dressings. Staff P reported not seeing the right upper arm rolled gauze earlier, another nurse was taking care of wounds, and maybe that nurse had dated (6/27/23) it wrong. Staff P removed the resident's sock from the left heel and stated the dressing was dated 7/1/23. The observation identified the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure two oxygen administration orders were clarified for one resident (#77) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings included: An observation on 07/10/23 at 10:32 a.m., showed Resident #77 was being administered oxygen via a nasal cannula at 2 liters per minute (lpm). During an interview on 07/10/23 at 10:32 a.m., Resident #77 stated she was to be administered three liters of oxygen continuously. A review of Resident #77's admission Record showed a diagnosis of sleep apnea, unspecified. A review of the July 2023 Medication Administration Record showed two physician orders for oxygen. The first physician order, dated 05/26/23, documented, O2 [oxygen] at 2 lpm via nasal cannula continuous for sleep apnea. The second physician order, dated 06/13/23, documented, O2 [oxygen] at 3 lpm via nasal cannula every shift. The care plan, initiated on 4/10/23, showed Resident #77 was At risk for impaired respiratory status and showed interventions to include, Administer oxygen per order. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure continuous communication with the dialysis center for one resident (#31) out of two residents reviewed for dialysis services. Findings included: During an interview on 07/10/23 at 10:09 a.m., Resident #31 stated he received dialysis services three days a week. A review of Resident #31's admission Record showed an admission date of 12/1/22 and diagnoses to include chronic kidney disease without heart failure, with Stage 5 chronic kidney disease, or end stage renal disease. A review of the July 2023 physician orders showed a physician order, dated 12/04/22, showed, Dialysis: May go to Dialysis on: Monday, Wednesday, Friday. A second physician order, dated 12/04/22, showed, Complete Dialysis communication form and send with Resident to dialysis center. A third physician order, dated 12/04/22, showed, Complete post communication dialysis form on return. A review of the care plan showed Resident #31 had a care plan focus, initiated on 12/5/22 and revised on 12/15/22, of Dialysis Care Plan: Renal failure with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure staff administered medication with adequate indication for use and monitored the administration and effectiveness of this medication for one resident (#21) out of 28 sampled residents; and administered antihypertensive medication outside physician ordered parameters twelve out of thirteen administrations reviewed for one (#45) out of five residents observed during the task of medication administration. Findings included: 1. A review of Resident #21's admission Record showed diagnoses of insomnia unspecified, anxiety disorder, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance and disorganized schizophrenia. A review of medical record revealed a nursing progress note, dated 06/05/23, and showed, resident was very upset all evening, claiming devil was in my belly resident wouldn't take melatonin for sleep, (gave her pudding with melatonin in it to calm her). A review of Resident #21's June 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed no physician order for Melatonin. The June 2023 MAR showed no Melatonin was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Thirty medication administration opportunities were observed and three errors were identified for two residents (#45 and #70) of five residents observed. These errors constituted a 10% medication error rate. Findings included: 1. On 7/11/23 at 8:24 a.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was conducted with Resident #45. Staff H placed an electronic blood pressure cuff on the upper portion of the resident's right arm, then removed it, placing it on the lower right forearm and obtained a blood pressure of 118/75 and a pulse of 80. Staff H returned to the medication cart and dispensed the following medications: - Atenolol 25 milligram (mg) tablet - Baclofen 10 mg tablet - Docusate Sodium 100 mg gelcap - Oxycodone/Acetaminophen 5-325 mg tablet Staff H confirmed a total of 4 tablets were dispensed, re-entered the resident's room and administered the medications. The Order Summary Report, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a safe and sanitary manner related to ensuring the range hood was free from dust. Findings included: Observations during the initial tour of the facility's kitchen on 6/28/21 at 10:30 AM revealed that the kitchen housed a range hood which was located over the stove and steam oven. Closer observation of the range hood revealed the light covers and piping were covered in dust particles. Closer observation of the range hood revealed the sealants had become dislodged from the seams of the range hood and was noted to be blowing back and forth over the stove and steamer. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) An interview at this time with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), who was present in the kitchen at the time of the initial tour revealed she was unsure as to when the range hood was last cleaned. An interview on 6/28/21 at 10:42 AM with the Maintenance Director revealed the vendor who cleans the hood is due to come tomorrow. They come every 3 months and in between visits the Maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment for 2 of 31 (#19, #27) sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #19's record revealed that this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnosis that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infraction affecting left non-dominant side and receives nutrition via tube feed. Observations of Resident #19 on 6/28/21 at 12:05 PM revealed that the resident was lying in her bed with the head of her bed elevated and her tube feeding hanging. Inspection of the residents room surrounding her bed revealed that there was a puddle of a light brown substance pooled on the floor located in the area beneath the tube feed formula, on the tube feed pole and on the floor mat next to the bed. (Photgraphic Evidence Obtained) Observations of Resident #19 on 6/29/21 at 10:03 AM revealed that the resident was lying in her bed with the head of her bed elevated and her tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, observation, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a grievance was acted upon for one resident (#46) of fifteen sampled residents. Findings included: Resident #46 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of perforated intestine, according to the face sheet in the admission record. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the medical record, dated 5/28/21, reflected a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating Resident #46's cognition was intact. On 6/28/21 at 10:39 AM an interview was conducted with Resident #46. She said the man that lives next door [Resident #16] is verbally abusive to the staff. He is obnoxious. He screams. He is vulgar. He wanders everywhere. She said he has not come in her room or spoke to her, but it's really a bother, and the staff aren't allowed to do anything about it. She has reported it to the ARNP [Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner] and the DON [Director of Nursing]. Resident #46 also said that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-01 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the necessary information was provided to the receiving facility during a transfer to the hospital for one resident (#16) of three residents sampled for a hospital transfer. Findings included: Resident #16 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, according to the face sheet in the admission record. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], reflected a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating an intact cognition. Further review of the assessment revealed the following information: Section G, functional status, locomotion on unit was marked supervision of one person. Section E, behaviors, verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others (e.g. threatening others, screaming at others, cursing at others) was marked 'behavior of this type occurred daily'. Other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others (e.g. physical symptoms such as hitting or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to obtain documentation from a hospice provider to ensure coordination of services for 1 of 2 (#17) residents receiving hospice services. Findings included: Review of the facility policy titled Hospice Care with an effective date of 11/30/14, and a revision date of 9/20/17 revealed the following: To ensure continuity of care between the center and the hospice provider, the Director of Nursing will designate a clinical member of the interdisciplinary team to work with the hospice including the following: Coordination of care plan process between the hospice and the center Communication with hospice representatives, hospice medical director and the patient/residence attending physician to ensure coordination of care. Ensure the following information is obtained from the Hospice: Most recent hospice plan of care A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicates that Resident #17 is currently receiving hospice care. Review of the current physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice related to communication with the dialysis facility, as evidenced by a failure of monitoring resident status pre and post dialysis for one resident (#25) of four residents receiving dialysis. Findings included: A review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed diagnoses that included type II diabetes, end stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis, and anemia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Review physician's orders revealed: -An order dated 2/23/2021 for Hemodialysis M/W/F (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) with pick up at 9:30 a.m., dialysis time 10:30 a.m. -An order dated 2/23/21 to assess dialysis port site on the left upper chest for bruising/bleeding/symptoms of infection. A review of Resident # 25's care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-01 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) practice that demonstrated implementation of an effective action plan to correct the previously cited deficient practice at F584 related to providing a clean and sanitary environment for one resident (#17) out of three residents who received nutrition through enteral feeding. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, Performance Improvement Committee, effective 11/30/2014 and revised 8/19/2020, identified that The committee will assure QAPI activities have indicators and standards/thresholds for evaluation, that appropriate actions are implemented, and that such correction has been evaluated by subsequent monitoring. Review of the admission Record for Resident #17 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with readmission on [DATE] and the diagnoses included personal history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to VIVO HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WINTER HAVEN HOLCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/01/2023 |
| JAKOBOVITS, NATHAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/01/2023 |
| KAGAN, JEFFREY | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 09/01/2023 |
| JEK IRRV TR II | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 09/01/2023 |
| NMJ IRRV TR II | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 09/01/2023 |
| GLUCK, BENJAMIN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 12% | since 09/01/2023 |
| CUKIER, JOSEF | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/01/2023 |
| FRIEDLAND, SHALOM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/01/2023 |
| FORVIS MAZARS LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2023 |
| PEASE BELL CPAS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2023 |
| SUMMATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2023 |
| VIVO HEALTHCARE CONSULTING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2023 |
| HARPER, JARED | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2024 |
| KIRBY, MELISSA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $157K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105998. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.