Palms Care Center And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 80.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 57% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 114.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 17% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable homelike interior for 3 of 3 residential units (200, 300, and 400), the Skilled Therapy Department, the Main Dining Room, the Activity Room, and the Main Lobby. The findings included: During the tour conducted on 10/21-22/24, resident meal observations conducted on 10/21-23/24, routine resident observations conducted on 10/21-23/24, and the environment tours conducted on 10/23-24/24 accompanied with the Corporate Maintenance Director, the Maintenance Director, and the Director of Housekeeping, the following were noted: 200 Resident Unit: room [ROOM NUMBER]: Room windows soiled, and window screens torn and in disrepair. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Room windows soiled, and window screens torn and in disrepair. 300 Resident Unit: room [ROOM NUMBER]/#302/#304: main hallway outside of rooms and inside of rooms noted pervasive and offensive body…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its Cycle menus (#1, #2, #3, and #4) met the nutritional requirements for daily milk / dairy servings and that the approved menu was being followed for potentially 105 of 113 facility's residents. The findings included: 1. During the review of the current Cycle menu in use (Cycle #3) on 10/21/24, it was noted that only 8-ounces on milk / dairy was being served to residents on a daily basis. An interview conducted with the Corporate Dietary Manager (CDM) at the time of the review to review documentation of why the facility menus did not include the required 16-ounces of milk per day to the residents (55 years or older). The surveyor specifically requested the government tool utilized to develop the facility's cycle menu. On 10/22/24, the CDM submitted to the surveyor a nutritional tool utilized for the development of the menus to be nutritionally adequate, and stated that an approved government tool was not utilized. Further interview and review noted an Optima Solutions Menu Template Nutrition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, sanitary conditions, and the prevention of foodborne illnesses for 110 of 113 residents. The findings included: 1. During the initial tour of the Main Kitchen on 10/21/24 at 9:30 AM, and accompanied by the Dietary Director, CDM (Certified Dietary Manager), the following was observed and noted: a. The walk-in refrigerator contained 2 expired items. The Marmalade was dated 10/11/24. The Chicken Broth was dated 09/25/24. b. The dishwasher was a low temperature dishwasher. The rinse temperature reached 140' F. The sanitization of the dishware depended upon the adequacy of the sanitizing solution. The Dietary Director, CDM, was asked to perform a chlorine sanitizer test to determine if the sanitizing solution was adequate to sanitize the dishware. The first test strip was dipped into the dishwasher solution, and it did not change color. A second test strip trial was performed and again the test strip did not change…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pest (flies and roaches). The findings included: 1. During resident screenings and routine observations conducted on 10/21/24 through 10/24/24, numerous sightings of flying insects were noted by the surveyors that included the following: a. On 10/21/24 - Main Kitchen (7, 9 AM), 300 and 400 Units, and Main Dining Room (12:30 PM). Staff stated that flies and roaches are a common daily occurrence. b. On 10/22/24 - Main Dining Room (8 AM) and in resident Hallways (8 AM - 10 AM). Staff and residents stated that flies are a common daily occurrence. c. On 10/23/24 - Main kitchen (7 AM) and the resident Hallways (300 and 400 Unit). Staff stated that flies are a daily common occurrence. d. On 10/24//24 - Main Dining room [ROOM NUMBER] AM and 12 PM, the resident Common Areas, and the resident Hallways (200, 300, and 400 Units). Photographic Evidence Obtained of above. 2.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services for 2 of 2 sampled residents, Residents #23 and #97, who were to receive the restorative dining program; and failed to maintain the residents' ability to communicate and to participate in activities of daily living (ADLs) for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #82, The findings included: 1. Review of the clinical record of Resident #23 on 10/22-23/24 noted a readmission date of 07/30/24 with current diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia. Review of the current physician orders included: On 12/04/23, Mechanical Soft Diet / Fortified Foods and Med Pass 2.0 - 120 ml Every Day, and Restorative Dining Program - Breakfast & Lunch Meals 7 days per week. Review of the resident's weight history documented a current weight of 100 pounds, occurring weight loss, and a BMI (Body Mass Index) of 18.5, indicating the resident was underweight / malnourished. Review of the current care plan dated 10/01/24 documented:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0742 — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate services to promote and maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for Paranoid Schizophrenia (Resident #90). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Behavioral Health Services, undated, included the following: Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 2. Residents who exhibit signs of emotional / psychosocial distress receive services and support that address their individual needs and goals for care. Record review for Resident #90 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admission on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Paranoid Personality Disorder, Delusional Disorders, Anxiety Disorder, and Paranoid Schizophrenia. Review of Section C of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #90 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating he was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to adequately monitor behaviors for residents receiving psychotropic medications for 3 of 6 sampled residents reviewed for psychotropic medications (Residents #90, #89, and #59). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring, revised March 2019, included the following: Policy Statement 1.The facility will provide, and residents will receive behavioral health services as needed to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. 6.The facility will comply with regulatory requirements related to the use of medications to manage behavioral changes. Management 1.The interdisciplinary team (IDT) will evaluate behavioral symptoms in residents to determine the degree of severity, distress and potential safety risk to the resident, and develop a plan of care accordingly.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that residents medications were properly stored as evidenced by medications being left on the resident's night stand for 1 of 1 sampled residents, Resident #26; and one opened bottle of Mucus Relief and one opened box of acetaminophen suppositories, over the counter medications (OTC), observed in the medication room cabinet for 1 of 2 medication storage rooms. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, revised 02/2023, provided by the Regional Nurse, documented, in part, The facility stores all medications .in locked compartments .the nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medications storage .in a clean, safe and sanitary manner medications are stored in an orderly manner in cabinets, drawers, carts each resident's medications are assigned to an individual cubicle, drawer, or other holding area . 1. On 10/21/24 at 11:02 AM, during initial tour to the facility's south wing, an interview was conducted with Resident #26 who…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in a pureed form designed to meet the needs of 2 sampled residents of 14 residents with physician ordered pureed diets, Residents #4 and #110. The census at the time of survey was 113 residents. The findings included: Record review of the Nutrition Service Policy and Procedure effective 07/01/23, described the pureed diet as able to be piped, layered, molded if able to retain shape, but should not require chewing if presented in this form. The weekly menus that were labeled Spring / Summer Menus Week 3, from the Optima Solutions Dietary Management System, listed a description of the pureed diet on each menu. It said: Holds shape on spoon; smooth texture; No separated liquid; not firm/sticky. In the dining room on 10/21/24 at 1:04 PM, Resident #4's lunch plate was observed with beef stroganoff that was supposed to be pureed according to the diet listed on the meal ticket. The beef had small lumps in it. The surveyor then went into the kitchen and spoke to the Dietary Manager. Observation revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, facility policies, and record reviews, the facility failed to encourage hand hygiene, provide hand hygiene supplies, and assist residents in performing hand hygiene before meals for 6 of sampled 6 residents, Residents #14, #64, #30, #74, #95, and #27. The findings included: Review of polciy, titled, SNF Clinic Handwashing/ Hand Hygiene - F880; Infection Control, submitted by the Administrator documented, in part, considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of healthcare associated infection, and #6 explaining Residents are encouraged to practice hand hygiene. 1. Record review revealed Resident #14 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Protein-calorie malnutrition, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (lung disease that blocks air flow causing difficulty of breathing), Muscle wasting and Atrophy (thinning of muscle). Record review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment Section C dated 09/19/24,revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$11,517 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $11,517 — penalty dated 2024-10-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FL SNF TRUST — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $10K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL