No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Williston Care Center And Rehab

300 NW 1st Ave, Williston, FL 32696 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (352) 528-3561 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
2 immediate-jeopardy citations$15,593 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (28) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,593 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-08)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
37 S Main St · (352) 528-0022 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8 NW Main St · (352) 528-3409 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
727 W Noble Ave · (352) 528-4827 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(352) 528-3060 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.2%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.8%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.9%4.6%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.4%2.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.6%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.8%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.9%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.3%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.4%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.5%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.3%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.792.131.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.761.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 86 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
79.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 79.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 106 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.2%CMS range 44.6–68.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.2%CMS range 6.2–12.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge79.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge80.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge72.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting93.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 4.9–12.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.28
RN hours/ resident / day
1.09
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.15
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.51
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.13
RN hoursweekends
48.5%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 110.7 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-03)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-11)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-11-08 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's expressed advanced directive for end of life by failing to ensure life saving measures, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], were initiated when Resident #1 was found unresponsive and absent of life. Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse stated the resident was dead and she did not provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation or contact Emergency Medical Services. The resident was not legally pronounced deceased until the Medical Director wrote a clarification statement on [DATE] at 8:27 PM stating that he had acknowledged the resident's death by releasing the remains to a funeral home. The hospice report of death record states the facility staff pronounced the resident deceased and did not document hospice's assessment of the resident's status. Resident #1 was pronounced deceased by Staff A, LPN who is not qualified to pronounce. CPR was not initiated per the resident's wishes due to the determination of being deceased by Staff A. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-11-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure nursing staff followed policy/procedure and the nurse practice act related to initiating emergency care for a resident found to be without a pulse or respiration such as initiating cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or calling emergency medical services. Staff A, a Licensed Practical Nurse, observed Resident #1 on [DATE] at 6:30 AM, unresponsive and absent of life, pronounced Resident #1 as deceased and withheld cardiopulmonary resuscitation despite the resident's full code status. The Licensed Practical Nurse stated the resident was dead and she did not provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation or contact Emergency Medical Services. The resident was not legally pronounced deceased until the Medical Director wrote a clarification statement on [DATE] at 8:27 PM stating that he had acknowledged the resident's death by releasing the remains to a funeral home. The hospice report of death record states that facility staff pronounced the resident deceased and did not document hospice's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received an accurate assessment reflective of the resident status for 2 of 7 residents, Residents #1 and #3 reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MD) assessments. 1)Review of Resident #1 Minimum Data Set (MDS) titled Quarterly dated 9/18/2025 in Section J Bladder and Bowel documented no indwelling catheter.Review of Resident #1 physician order dated 1/24/2025 read, Cath [Catheter] Change urinary catheter bag and tubing once monthly and as needed.Review of Resident #1 physician order dated 9/9/2025 read, Suprapubic Catheter Dx [Diagnosis]: Neurogenic bladder.Review of Resident #1 physician order dated 9/9/2025 read, Cath: Catheter care with soap and water every shift pat dry, apply T-drain per resident request and as needed.During an interview on 12/05/2025 at 12:40 with the MDS Coordinator stated, [Residnet #1's name] does have a catheter, not sure why it was coded no. We will have do submit a modification and correct it.Review of the facility policy and procedure titled MDS Assessment with an issue date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain dignity for a resident who needed assistance with feeding for 1 of 6 residents, Resident #5, reviewed for dining. Findings include: During an observation on 3/31/2025 at 2:58 PM Staff D, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed standing while feeding Resident #5 at bedside. During an observation on 4/02/2025 at 12:51 PM Staff D, CNA, was standing by Resident #5's bedside feeding Resident #5. During an interview on 4/02/2025 at 12:51 PM Staff D, CNA stated, I have a bad back. The CNA then quickly sat down in the chair that was beside her. During an interview on 4/02/2025 at 12:56 PM Staff C, Unit Manager stated, Staff are supposed to sit while assistive feeding. During an interview on 4/03/2025 at 9:16AM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, There should be good lighting, set the resident up, and sit down to feed the resident. The policy and procedure were requested for assistive dining. The DON stated she did not have a policy on feeding residents, but the standard of care is for staff to sit at eye level to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to accurately assess the resident status for 3 of 9 residents, Residents #31, #54, and #367) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. Findings include: 1) Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] section C for Resident #54 read, BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status as a score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] section J for Resident #54 read, Current tobacco - Yes. During an interview on 4/1/2025 at 4:06 PM Staff H, MDS Nurse stated, The resident [Resident #54] is not a smoker and the documentation in the MDS in section J, was documented in error. 2) Review of the medical diagnosis for Resident #31documented a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia (a condition where there's an abnormally high level of carbon dioxide in the blood). Review of a physician order for Resident #31 read, Continuous O2 (oxygen) at 3 Liters per Minute (L/min) via NC (nasal canula)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that addressed the residents' medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs for 4 of 9 residents, Resident numbers #31, #33, #66, and #367, reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Findings include: 1) Review of medical diagnosis for Resident #31 revealed a diagnosis of major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and persistent mood disorder. Review of the [Name of the organization that provides behavioral health/psychiatric and psychotherapy services] progress note dated 3/19/2025 for Resident #31 read, Chief Complaint: depression, anxiety, insomnia and mood disorder. During an interview on 4/2/2025 at 11:22 AM, APRN (Advanced Practice Registered Nurse) #2 stated, The Resident does have diagnosis and receives treatment for major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and persistent mood disorder. During an interview on 4/2/2025 at 12:20 PM Resident #31 stated, I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide nail care services for dependent residents for 1 of 5 residents, Resident #54, reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Findings include: During an observation on 3/31/2025 at 10:05 AM Resident #54 was observed to have a large amount of a brown substance under the fingernails of both of her hands. During an observation on 4/1/2025 at 10:51 AM Resident #54 was observed to have a large amount of a brown substance under the fingernails of both of her hands. During an observation on 4/2/2025 at 9:20 AM Resident #54 was observed to have a large amount of a brown substance under the fingernails of both of her hands. During an interview on 4/2/2025 at 11:12 AM Staff O, Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) stated, Her (Resident #54) nails are dirty and do not look like they have been cleaned recently. During an interview on 4/2/2025 at 12:37 PM the DON (Director of Nursing) stated, My expectations are a dependent resident should have their nails cleaned with their ADL care. Review of medical diagnosis on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure it is free of medication errors of five percent or greater for 2 of 33 observations of medication administration, the error rate was 6.06%. Findings include: During an observation on 4/2/2025 at 8:18 AM of Staff B License Practical Nurse (LPN) for Resident #416's medication administration, Staff B removed one tablet of Amiodarone 100 mg (milligrams), one tablet empagliflozin 10 mg, one tablet Ferex 150 plus, half a tablet of spironolactone 12.5 mg, two tablets of Bumex 2mg, one tablet of Eliquis 5 mg, on tablet of Entresto 49-51mg, and one tablet of metoprolol 25 mg placing the medications into a clear medication cup. Staff B entered Resident #416's room and administered all the medications in the medication cup. Staff B returned to the medication cart and signed off the administration of the medications as listed. Review of Resident #416's physician order dated 3/25/2025 read, Amiodarone HCI Tablet 100 mg (Amiodarone HCI) give 200 mg by mouth one time a day for htn [hypertension]. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with accepted professional principles for 2 of 4 medication carts and 1 of 4 hallways reviewed for unattended medication and labeling. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 3/31/25 at 11:20 AM of Resident #318 it showed the resident had a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line to the upper left arm. There was IV (intravenous) tubing that was not dated and an IV-cefriaxone (used to treat bacterial infections) solution medication bag that was not labeled with the date and time. During an interview on 3/31/2025 at 12:52 PM Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN) stated, The IV tubing hanging from the I/V pole for [Resident #318's name] should have a label with a date and time it was hung. During an interview on 4/03/25 at 09:16 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, Staff should have labeled the medication bag and the IV tubing. Review of the policy and procedure titled IV Infusions with a last review date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurately documented medical records for 1 of 6 residents, Resident #66 reviewed for medication review and 1 of 3 residents, Resident #31 reviewed for weights. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #66's physician order dated 3/1/2025 read, Insulin Apart FlexPen 100 unit/ml [100 unit per milliliter] solution pen-injector inject as per sliding scale. Review of Resident #66 Medication Administration Record for the month of March 2025 documented Insulin Apart at 0630 [6:30 AM] on 3/27/2025 was blank, at 1630 [4:30PM] on 3/15/2025 and 3/28/2025 the entry was blank, on 3/12/2025 at 2100 [9:00 PM] the entry was blank, and no blood sugar levels or insulin coverage was documented. Review of Resident #66's progress note dated 3/28/2025 read, Resident went out today. Returned drunk slurred speech, unsteady gait. Meds held per md's [Medical Doctor's] orders. Review of Resident #66 Release of Responsibility for leave of absence form documented on 3/15/2025 at 2:04 PM Resident #66 signed himself…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2) During an observation on 3/31/25 at 9:55 AM, Resident #29 was lying in a bariatric bed; dressed in a hospital gown and wearing a brief. Both of the resident's feet were propped up on pillows, and there was a Podus Boot (designed to support and position the ankle and foot) on his right foot. During an interview on 3/31/25 at 9:55 AM, Resident #29 stated that he wore briefs and that he required assistance from the staff for his Activities of Daily Living (ADL) needs. During an observation on 4/2/25 at 9:25 AM, Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) performed peri-care for Resident #29. Staff A did not remove her gloves and perform hand hygiene. Staff A opened a drawer in Resident #29's dresser, pulled out a tube of ointment, and applied some to Resident #29's sacrum and buttocks. After applying the ointment for Resident #29, while still wearing her soiled gloves, Staff A picked up the wash basin, emptied the water out of the basin and placed the basin, soap and ointment in the drawers of the resident's dresser. During an interview on 4/2/25 at 9:38 AM, Staff A, CNA stated, I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy and procedure the facility failed to label and store all medications in accordance with professional standards of practice in 3 of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: During an observation of medication cart #1 on 1/8/2023 at 8:55 AM with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) there was one unopened Levemir insulin pen with pharmacy instructions to refrigerate until opened and one unopened Ozempic pen with pharmacy instructions to refrigerate until opened. During an interview on 1/8/2024 at 9:03 AM Staff A, LPN stated, They must have just been put on the cart. I did not put them on the cart. They should be in the refrigerator until we need them, and they are opened. During an observation of medication cart #2 on 1/8/2024 at 9:05 AM with Staff B, LPN there was one unopened bottle of latanoprost ophthalmic solution (eye drops) with pharmacy instructions to refrigerate until opened, and one Loperamide (a medication to treat diarrhea) tablet with no resident identifier and not in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 16 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and review of policies and procedures the facility failed to consult with the physician and/or resident representative when there was a change of condition for 2 of 4 residents, Residents #47 and #361, reviewed for changes in condition in a total sample of 37 residents. Findings include: Review of the admission record for Resident #47 documented diagnosis that include type II diabetes mellitus, chronic pancreatitis, gastroparesis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, essential tremor, and major depressive disorder. Review of the physician orders for Resident #47 dated 10/22/2023 read, Humalog injection solution inject as per sliding scale. Inject subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime. If less than 70, notify MD [Medical Doctor], follow hypoglycemia [a low blood sugar result] protocol. Inject as per sliding scale, 201-250 = 2 units, 251-300 = 4 units, 301-360 = 8 units, greater than 400, administer 10 units and notify MD. Review of the January 2024 medication administration record (MAR) for Resident #47 documented a blood sugar of 48 at 6:30 AM on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for respiratory care for 2 of 3 residents, Resident #96 and #7, reviewed for respiratory care services out of a total sample of 37 residents. Findings include: Review of the admission record for Resident #96 documented diagnosis to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic systolic congestive heart failure (CHF), acute respiratory distress, and essential primary hypertension. Review of the physician orders for Resident #96 dated 10/21/2023 read, Continuous O2 [oxygen] at 3 LPM [liters per minute] via nasal cannula as needed for respiratory distress. Review of the written plan of care for Resident #96 read, [Resident #96's name] has a potential for complications of respiratory distress r/t [related to] dx [diagnosis] of COPD and CHF. Interventions: Administer O2 as ordered (3 liters) During an observation on 1/8/2024 at 11:09 AM Resident #96 was observed in bed with oxygen being administered by a concentrator at 4 liters via nasal cannula.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policies and procedures the facility failed to ensure residents who required blood glucose monitoring received treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to document, assess and treat hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #47, reviewed for insulin administration. Findings include: Review of the admission record for Resident #47 documented diagnosis to include type II diabetes mellitus, chronic pancreatitis, gastroparesis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, essential tremor, and major depressive disorder. Review of the physician orders for Resident #47 dated 7/7/2023 read, For blood sugar less than 60 and resident is able to swallow, administer food or glucose gel per manufacturers instruction and notify MD [Medical Doctor] as needed for hypoglycemia. Review of the physician orders for Resident #47 dated 10/22/2023 read, Humalog injection solution inject as per sliding scale. Inject subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime. If less than 70, notify MD [Medical Doctor],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for maintaining urine flow and ensuring proper infection control techniques for urinary catheter care for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #361, reviewed for urinary catheters in a total sample of 37 residents. Findings include: Review of the admission record for Resident #361 documented diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, type II diabetes mellitus, and essential primary hypertension. Review the physician orders for Resident #361 dated 12/29/2023 read, Catheter Care: Monitor urinary catheter for impairment of drainage flow (kinks). Ensure bag has privacy cover and is below bladder. During an observation on 1/8/2024 at 11:51 AM, Resident #361 was sitting in a wheelchair in the hallway with a urinary catheter drainage bag attached to the wheelchair with the catheter tubing resting on the floor and dragging across the floor when Resident #361 began wheeling himself in the hallway. The tubing had amber colored urine and was not able to drain into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure food items are dated and/or labeled, expired sanitation test strips are discarded, and food is served in accordance with professional standards for food service and safety. Findings include: During an initial walk through of the kitchen on 1/08/24 at 9:15 AM with the Charge Cook, Staff E, an observation was made of nine bags of various vegetables in the reach-in freezer that had been removed from their original packaging and were not labeled with a food item identifier, receive date, or use-by date. An observation was made of test strips used for dish washing to verify the concentration of the sanitizer to verify it is strong enough to kill bacteria, viruses, and fungi, or that it is not too strong, had an expiration date of 11/20/23. An interview was conducted with Staff E on 1/08/24 at 9:20 AM. Staff E stated the test strips were expired and should have been discarded on 11/20/23, the vegetables in the reach-in freezer should have had identifying labels as well as use-by dates. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident record review and interview the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete record documentation of insulin administration for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #47, reviewed for insulin administration. Findings include: Review of the admission record for Resident #47 documented diagnosis that include type II diabetes mellitus, chronic pancreatitis, gastroparesis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, essential tremor, and major depressive disorder. Review of the physician orders for Resident #47 dated 10/22/2023 read, Humalog injection solution inject as per sliding scale. Inject subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime. If less than 70, notify MD [Medical Doctor], follow hypoglycemia [a low blood sugar result] protocol. Inject as per sliding scale, 201-250 = 2 units, 251-300 = 4 units, 301-360 = 8 units, greater than 400, administer 10 units and notify MD. Review of the physician orders for Resident #47 dated 12/14/2023 read, Lantus subcutaneous solution inject 34 units every 12 hours related to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Review of January 2024 medication administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policies and procedures the facility failed to ensure infection control practice standards were maintained for 1 of 5 observations during medication administration. Findings include: During an observation of medication administration conducted on 1/10/2024 at 7:05 AM, for Resident #4, Staff I, Registered Nurse (RN) did not perform hand hygiene when returning to the medication cart and began to prepare medications for Resident #4. Staff I, RN did not perform hand hygiene when entering Resident #4's room, touched the overbed table and moved it out of the way, and administered oral medications. Staff I, RN exited the room without performing hand hygiene, returned to the medication cart, retrieved eye drops and returned to Resident #4's room, donned gloves without performing hand hygiene, administered one eye drop into Resident #4's left eye, removed the gloves and went to the trash can to dispose of the gloves. One glove dropped on the floor beside the trash can and Staff I, RN leaned down placing her left ungloved hand on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurately documented medical records for 1 of 3 sampled residents, Resident #1. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of acute and chronic respiratory failure, morbid obesity due to excess calories, cirrhosis of the liver, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, left nondominant side, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, essential (primary) hypertension, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the nursing progress note dated [DATE] at 8:06 AM, written by Staff A, LPN reads, At approximately 6:30 AM, this nurse went into room [Resident #1's room] to give medication and observed patient lying in bed on back absent of pulse and respiration. Called [Hospice company name], [Resident #1's primary care physician name], and [Resident #1's daughters name]. [close quote] Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-07-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — widespread
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received care for peripherally inserted central catheters in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents with central venous catheters, Residents #200 and #206, in a total sample of 48 residents. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 7/17/2022 at 10:51 AM, Resident #200 had a left upper arm midline catheter with a dressing date of 7/10/22, with 2 sides lifting up and exposing the insertion site and a 2x2 gauze under the transparent dressing. During an interview on 7/17/2022 at 10:51 AM, Resident #200 stated, They haven't changed this dressing since it was put in. Review of Resident #200's records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, depression, cardiomyopathy (a disease of the heart muscle that makes hard for the heart to pump blood to the body), diabetic neuropathy, essential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-07-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the food production area and equipment in a clean and sanitary manner. Findings include: During the initial tour on 7/17/2022 beginning at 9:07 AM with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), observation of the food production area and equipment showed: 1. The oven had a black sticky substance around the control knobs under both the stove top and flat top. The stove front had long black, brown and white drips running down the length of the stove front. The stove door handles had a brown substance on them. 2. The fryer had white drips and splatter on both the front and sides of the fryer. 3. The tile floor between the fryer and convection oven had large amounts of black substances on the floor. The metal strip on the floor to the left of the fryer had large amounts of black debris along its length. 4. The convection oven window was brown. When convection oven doors were open, there were black and brown substance along the inside front of the convection oven with yellow drips along the edge. 5. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 3 residents, Residents #89 and #78, in a total sample of 48 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #89's records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and congestive heart failure. Review of the physician orders for Resident #89 reads, reads, Order Summary: May apply O2 [oxygen] @ [at] 3 LPM [Liters Per Minute] via nasal cannula as needed for respiratory distress related to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease . Order Date: 04/13/2022. During an observation on 7/18/2022 at 9:30 AM, Resident #89 was resting with head of bed at 30 degrees with oxygen being administered at 1 liter via nasal cannula. During an interview on 7/18/2022 at 9:11 AM, Resident #89 stated, My oxygen is set at 1 and I only use oxygen when needed. I do not change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and included the expiration date when applicable in 4 of 5 medication carts reviewed. Findings include: During an observation of medication cart #1 on 7/17/2022 at 8:50 AM with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), there were one opened Timolol ophthalmic solution with no resident identifier and no opened date, one opened Latanoprost ophthalmic solution with no opened or expiration dates, one unopened Latanoprost ophthalmic solution with the pharmacy instructions to refrigerate until opened, one opened Erythromycin ophthalmic ointment with no opened date, one Basaglar insulin pen with no opened or expiration dates, one opened Lantus insulin pen with no opened or expiration dates, one unopened Humalog insulin with the pharmacy instructions to refrigerate until opened, one opened Humalog insulin with no opened or expiration dates, and one opened Lantus insulin with no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to prevent the possible development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to ensure the staff performed hand hygiene during medication administration in 6 of 8 observations of medication administration. Findings include: During an observation of medication administration on 7/19/2022 at 8:30 AM, Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), poured medications for Resident #8 without performing hand hygiene, entered the resident's room without performing hand hygiene, administered medications, and returned to the medication cart. During an observation of medication administration on 7/19/2022 at 8:35 AM, Staff F, LPN, poured medications for Resident #58, entered the resident's room, assisted the resident with repositioning, administered the medications, and returned to the medication cart and began pouring medications for another resident. Staff F did not perform hand hygiene. During an observation of medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements were offered as ordered by the physician for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #70, in a total sample of 48 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #70's records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including essential (primary) hypertension, major depressive disorder, other specified arthritis, personal history of COVID-19, and primary insomnia. Review of the physician orders for Resident #70 reads, Order Summary: Magic cup one time a day for wound healing lunch daily. Order Date: 07/10/2022. During an observation on 7/17/2022 at 1:39 PM, no magic cup provided to Resident #70 on her lunch tray. During an observation on 7/18/2022 at 12:34 PM, Resident #70 did not have magic cup delivered on her meal try. During an observation on 7/19/2022 at 12:44 PM, Resident #70 had no magic cup delivered on her lunch tray. During an interview on 7/19/2022…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-20 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide medically-related social services for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident #17, in a total sample of 48 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #17's admission record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including quadriplegia; unspecified, post-polio syndrome; central retinal vein occlusion, left eye, stable; primary open-angle glaucoma, bilateral, stage unspecified; and unspecified vision loss. During an observation on 7/17/2022 at 9:39 AM, Resident #17 was in his room, lying in his bed immobile and nonresponsive to interview attempts. Review of Resident #17's Referral to Therapy form, signed by the Speech Language Pathologist on 4/10/2022, reads, 4/3: Attempted to eval [evaluate] swallow status. Pt [patient] presents as Confused rambling incoherently. Diff [difficulty] communicating needs as he is sev [severely] HOH [hard of hearing], no glasses thus cannot use comm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Resident #80, in a total sample of 48 residents. Findings include: Review of the admission record for Resident #80 documented an admission date of 2/16/2022 with medical diagnoses that included type 1 diabetes mellitus with diabetic peripheral angiopathy (blood vessel disease caused by high blood sugar levels) without gangrene, gastroparesis, other chronic pancreatitis, and long-term use of insulin. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the period from 6/1/2022 through 6/30/2022 for Resident #80 reads, Humalog Solution 100 unit/ml [milliliter] (Insulin Lispro (Human)), Inject as per sliding scale: if [Blood sugar levels are] 201-250 = 2 units, under 60 follow hypoglycemia protocol, 251-300= 4 units, 301-350= 6 units, 351-400= 8 units, 401+ administer 10 units and notify MD [Medical Doctor], subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime for diabetes . Insulin Glargine-yfgn [Lantus,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,593 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $7,796 — penalty dated 2023-11-08
  • $7,797 — penalty dated 2023-11-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FL SNF TRUST — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WILLISTON NURSING HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/01/2023
FL MASTER OPCO HOLDCO II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2023
FL SNF TRUST IOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2023
FL SNF TRUST IIOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2023
BAIJNATH, HEMWATTIEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/01/2023
ELLENBOGEN, MOSSIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2023

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$10K
Related-party expense0% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 15%Other / private 21%

This home reported $10K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$318per resident / day
operating cost
$9,652per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$337per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105467. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next