Excel Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 152 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.68 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-12-03 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure incontinent care was provided for four residents (#7, #8, #9, #10) out of five residents sampled. Findings Included: On 12/02/25 at 9:37 a.m., Resident #10 was observed and interviewed lying in bed waiting for incontinent care. Resident #10 stated they have been asking for help going to the bathroom all morning and most days they are left sitting in their wet incontinent product for long periods of time.Review of Resident #10's admission record revealed an admission date of 10/20/25, with diagnoses to include Parkinson's disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dementia, anxiety, dizziness, and muscle weakness.A review of Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed: a brief interview for mental status (BIMS), a score of 6, meaning severe impairment. Functional Abilities, dependent for toileting hygiene and lower body dressing; partial/moderate assistance for toilet transfers. Bladder and Bowel revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store food under sanitary condition by not ensuring the walk-in refrigerator and the milk box cooler contained thermometers on the inside. This has the potential to affect 108 out of 116 residents who eat orally residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Observation of the initial kitchen tour on 1/22/24 at 8:42 AM with the Certified Dietary Manager Dietitian (CDM) revealed the following: 1) Walk-in refrigerator temperature outside was 40 degrees F and for the inside temperature, there was no thermometer noted. The walk-in refrigerator contained dairy products, cheese, pasteurized eggs in the shell, liquid pasteurized eggs, milk, vegetables, fruits, and preparation lunch items and 2) Milk Box temperature inside, there was no thermometer noted. The milk box contained milk cartons. Record review of the facility's Food Storage Policy indicated: Cold Policy and Procedure (revision date October 2019); Policy Statement-It is the center policy to insure all Time/Temperature Control for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete the Discharge- Return Non-Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) to Centers of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) within 14 days for one (Resident # 103) out of one resident was discharged to the community who was investigated for Resident Assessment. This deficiency has the potential to affect 116 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: Record review of the clinical records for Resident #103 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged home on [DATE]. Review of the Discharge-Return Non-Anticipated MDS assessment dated [DATE] was in progress. Section C and E-K were not completed. Interview with MDS Coordinator on 01/24/2024 at 12:17 PM. She stated that the assessment was not completed. She stated they did not realize the assessment was not completed until Tuesday January 23 when the system alerted them. She stated the assessment will be completed today. Further review after the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically transmit the Discharge- Return Non-Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) to Centers of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) within 14 days for one (Resident # 103) out of one resident whose Resident Assessments was investigated that was discharged to the community. There were 116 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Record review of the clinical records for Resident #103 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged home on [DATE]. Review of the Discharge-Return Non-Anticipated MDS assessment dated [DATE] was completed and transmitted on 01/24/2024. Interview with MDS Coordinator on 01/24/2024 at 12:17 PM. She stated that the assessment was not completed in a timely manner. She stated they did not realize the assessment was not completed until Tuesday January 23 when the system alerted them. She stated the assessment will be completed and transmitted today. Follow up…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the provision of a safe environment related to safety floor mats to prevent accidents in the event of a fall for one Resident (#83) out of 27 sampled residents. There were 116 residents residing at the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: On 01/22/24 at 09:31 AM, during the initial observation Resident # 83 was in bed asleep, no distress noted, one fall mat was observed on the left side of bed and one safety floor mat was against the wall behind the head of the bed, (Photographic evidence available). On 01/23/24 at 09:15 AM Resident observed in bed awake watching television, call light on bed, one floor mat on left side of the bed on the floor, right side floor mat against the wall, behind the head of the bed, (Photographic evidence available). On 01/24/24 at 10:17 AM Resident #83 was observed seated in a wheelchair in the therapy room with therapist, no distress noted. During observation on 1/24/23 at 09:00…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical procedures were followed during medication administration. As evidenced by during medication administration the Registered Nurse signed off on Resident #2's medication as given before administering the medications for one out of four residents observed, and left the medication cart unlocked in the hallway during medication administration in Resident #2's room. There were 116 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: On 1/23/24 at 9:35AM, during medication administration observation Registered Nurse (Staff A), prepared all the medications for administration to Resident #2, signed off all the medications as given on the Electronic Medication Administration Record, locked the computer and entered the room to give Resident # 2 the medications. Staff A entered the room, gave Resident #2 the medications and exited the room. On 1/23/24 at 9:43AM, the Surveyor apprised Registered Nurse, Staff A that she was observed signing off on Resident's #2's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide wound care in accordance with professional standards for two (#54, #21) of three residents sampled for pressure ulcers out of 11 total residents with pressure ulcers related to failure to change Resident #54's dressings daily as ordered for two of four days, failure to provide positioning and offloading for wound healing for Resident #54, and failure to ensure weekly wound measurements were taken for Resident's #54, and #21. Findings Included: 1. Review of Resident #54's admission Record revealed an admission date of 9/3/21 and admitting diagnoses to include type 2 diabetes mellitus, paraplegia, pressure ulcer left hip unstageable, pressure ulcer of right buttock stage 4, pressure ulcer of right heel unstageable, pressure induced deep tissue damage of right heel, pressure ulcer of left heel, unstageable, pressure induced deep tissue damage of left heel, and pressure ulcer of other site stage 4. Review of the physician progress note dated 9/16/21 at 9:24 p.m. detailed the chief complaint as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, the plan of care, and physician orders for four (#91,#28, #79, #43) of 41 sampled residents related to removal of surgical staples as ordered for Resident #91, weekly weights as ordered for Resident #28, administration of ordered medication for a non-pressure related skin condition for Resident #79, and lack of modification to the medication schedule to accommodate for scheduled dialysis for Resident #43. Findings included: 1. Review of the admission Record for Resident #91 revealed an initial admission date in 2016, a most recent hospital stay of 9/28/21 to 10/5/21, a most recent re-admission date of 10/5/21, and a diagnosis to include unspecified fracture of Left femur and subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing dated 9/23/21. A review of a physician progress note, dated 10/6/21 at 1:00 p.m., identified that Resident #91 was readmitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-10-14 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were received for monitoring and care of an intravenous (IV) site for one (#54) of one resident sampled for intravenous (IV) care out of two facility residents receiving IV therapy. Findings included: Review of Resident #54's admission Record revealed an admission date of 9/3/21 and admitting diagnoses to include multiple pressure ulcers and two pressure induced deep tissue damaged areas. Review of wound culture 1 dated 9/26/21 and reported on 9/30/21 revealed gram positive cocci, staphylococcus aureus (isolate1) penicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated, moderate growth, gram negative rods, Proteus mirabilis, providencia stuartii. Review of physician orders revealed the following orders dated 9/30/21: Ok to insert midline for IV antibiotic therapy x 10 days may use lidocaine 1% for insertion and Ceftriaxone sodium solution 1 gram Intravenous every 24 hours for 10 days for multiorganism wound infection. No additional orders were present related to the IV. On 10/12/21…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2020-01-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview policy, and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity and respect during the dining experience in the main dining room for ten (#s 20, 22, 23, 27, 39, 40, 43, 49, 101, and 211) of 52 sampled residents, during two (1/28 and 1/30/20) of four survey days, and in two (400 and 500) hallways and did not ensure that resident council members felt respected by staff during dining. Findings Included 1. An observation was conducted in the main hallway outside of the main dining room, on 1/28/20 at 12:04 p.m. A CNA was observed wheeling Resident #49 toward the area outside of the dining room. Four residents were observed to already be seated in wheelchairs in that area. The Director of Nursing (DON) was observed to stop Resident #49, and in front of four residents and the surveyor, ask the resident if he could come shave this stuff off your chin after lunch while pointing to the chin area of her face. Resident # 49 was observed to have visible hair growth on her chin. The resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FL SNF TRUST — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $10K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL