No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Gulf Shore Care Center

6767 86th Ave N, Pinellas Park, FL 33782 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (727) 548-5566 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (727) 548-5566 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Sep 2021
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (20) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
9095 Belcher Rd N · (727) 548-0001 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6280 66th St · (727) 544-4203 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
8191 66th St N · (727) 546-8488 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Lake Seminole Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.6%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.9%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms19.7%4.6%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.5%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication3.4%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers11.7%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.0%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.2%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%1.5%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.5%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.5%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.0%9.1%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.132.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.811.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 312 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
72.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.54U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.23hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 72.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 227 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.4%CMS range 42.0–53.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.4%CMS range 10.1–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge72.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting87.9%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge87.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.3%CMS range 7.2–15.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.291.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.37
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.53
RN hoursweekends
33.9%
Total nursing turnover
28.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.6 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.547 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-25)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-25 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure Pre admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARRs) were accurate for five residents (#78, #5, #77, #2, #8) out of six residents sampled.Findings Included: 1. Review of Resident #78's admission record revealed an admission date of 02/20/2026. Resident #78 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis to include post-traumatic stress disorder, unspecified, major, depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate, alcohol abuse, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #78's PASARR dated 02/20/2026 revealed section A. MI (Mental illness) was blank. Section II. Questions 1-7 were marked no. Section III revealed it was marked: no to provisional admission. IV. No diagnosis or suspicion or Serious MI or ID indicated. Level II PASARR eval not required was marked. 2. Review of Resident #5's admission record revealed an admission date of 02/21/2026. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis to include epilepsy, unspecified,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and resident choice related to: 1) positioning of one (Resident #18), 2) communication with hospice for one (Resident #14), and 3) documentation of physician orders related to behavior monitoring, medications administration, wound care and tube feeding for three (Resident #5, Resident #11 and Resident #1) of six residents sampled. Findings Included: During an observation on 3/22/2026 at 12: 30 p.m., Resident #18 was observed in the dining room sitting in her wheelchair. Resident #18's torso was shifted off center towards the left of the wheelchair. During an observation on 03/23/2026 at 1:22 p.m., Resident #18 was observed sitting in a wheelchair near the nurse's station. Resident #18's torso shifted off center towards the right of the wheelchair. Review of Resident #18's admission record revealed an admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be treated with dignity was honored, related to untimely incontinence care, resulting in anxiety for one resident (#13) out of one resident sampled.Findings included: On 3/22/26 at 11:53 AM an interview was conducted with Resident #13. Resident #13 revealed for at least the past two weeks they have had to sit in their own bowel movement for over an hour waiting for care on Thursdays and Fridays. The resident stated it is the same aides on both shifts that continue to lack timeliness in providing incontinence care. Resident #13 stated it upsets her when she has to wait so long. The resident said they never use their call light unless they have a bowel movement. Resident #13 said they were not a high-maintenance resident and only call for an aide when they needed assistance with bowel incontinence care. Resident #13 stated the aide will come and turn off the call light, tell them they will be right back and then take over an hour to come and perform incontinence care.On 3/25/26 at 2:02 PM an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach for one (Resident #127) out of one residents sampled. Findings Included: During an observation on 3/23/2026 at 2:36 PM Resident #127 was observed seated in a wheelchair on the right side of the bed, facing east, a table in front of him with an open styrofoam container with spaghetti and meatballs. Resident #127 raised his left wrist and pointed saying pain. Resident #127 pointed to his neck with his right hand and said pain. I have told many people, and they have not done anything. I cannot walk or move and my pants are dirty. Resident #127's call light was observed to be hanging on the left side of his bed, out of his reach. During an observation on 3/24/2026 at 8:49 AM Resident #127 was observed wearing a hospital gown, sitting on the right side of the bed facing the door. Resident #127 pointed to his neck and stated pain, can you help me. Resident #127's call light was observed on the floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded for two (2) out of six sampled residents (Resident #6 # 77). Findings included: Review of Resident # 6 admission record dated 03/25/2026 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to recurrent moderate major depressive disorder, unspecified post- traumatic stress disorder, and unspecified personality disorder. Review of Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/1/2026 revealed Section A Identification information A1500 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) revealed no for answer to is the resident currently considered by the state Level II PASRR process to have a serious mental illness and/ or intellectual disability or a related condition. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident # 6 should have been considered for a level II PASRR due to his mental illness for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure appropriate supervision during smoking time for one (Resident #77) out of four residents sampled. Findings included: On 03/22/2026 at 9:40 AM, and 1:45 pm, Resident # 77 was observed sitting outside smoking a cigarette with a smoke apron on. A staff member was observed sitting behind a table inside the facility with a cart observed next to the table. On 03/22/2026 at 9:40 AM. An interview was conducted with Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant (CAN). Staff B, CNA stated she is the smoking aid for today. Staff B stated she always sits inside the facility when she provides supervision during smoking times. Review of Resident #77's admission record dated 02/25/2026 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate, generalized anxiety disorder, brief psychotic disorder, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication was obtained one (Resident #27) of seven residents sampled. Findings include: On 03/22/2026 at 9:20 AM, Resident # 27 was observed in bed with the bed at a 90-degree angle. A pillow was observed under his legs to keep his feet offloaded while in bed. Resident # 27 stated he has felt weak, so he has not been out of bed or participated in therapy. On 03/22/2026 at 12: 50 PM, Resident # 27 was observed sitting up in bed eating lunch and visiting with his wife. Review of an admission record dated 03/25/2026 revealed Resident # 27 was admitted to the facility originally on 01/20/2026 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, generalized anxiety disorder, acute and chronic respiratory failure, unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia, obstructive sleep apnea (adult) (pediatric) Review of nursing progress note dated 3/11/2026 showed Modafinil Tablet 200 milligram…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility did not ensure narcotics were double locked and stored safely, medications were labeled with an opened date and an expiration date, and thickened liquids requiring refrigeration were removed from one of two medication storage rooms and one of four medication carts.Findings included: An observation on 3/22/2026 at 9:50 A.M. of the East side medication storage room revealed several narcotics were stored in an unlocked box in the refrigerator labeled B Box. An observation on 3/22/2026 at 10:00 A.M. of East Hall 200 medication cart revealed a Symbicort inhaler was opened, used, and undated; an opened box of thicken liquids dated 2/22/2026 in third drawer of the medication cart. The directions on the thickened liquids box were: Refrigerate prior to serving.After opening, may be kept up to 7 days under refrigeration. An interview on 3/22/2026 at 10:02 A.M. with Staff K, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was conducted. He said the narcotics should have been locked. He said he did not have a key for the lock. He said that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the sanitizer solution reached the low temperature dish machine by way of pump and tubing, failed to maintain the chlorine concentration between 50-100 ppm (parts per million) per manufacturer recommendations, and failed to maintain the ice machine in one of two nourishment rooms in a clean and sanitary manner. Findings included: On 11/06/2023 at 9:07 a.m., a general tour of the kitchen was conducted. While conducting the tour, the Dietary Manager was observed operating the dish machine. The dish machine log was reviewed for the week of (10/30-11/05) and revealed daily water temperatures as well as sanitizer concentration logged three times a day except for 11/05 at 1:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. The log revealed water temperatures of 150 degrees F and sanitizer concentration of 200 ppm (parts per million) for each day the log was completed. The instructions at the bottom of the form showed chlorine concentration must be between 50-100 ppm. Per the instructions, the logged sanitizer concentration was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services for urinary catheters were provided to prevent infection for one (Resident #455) of one resident sampled for urinary catheters. Findings included: A review of Resident #455's medical record revealed Resident #455 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of urinary tract infection, retention of urine, and flaccid neuropathic bladder. A review of Resident #455's physician's orders revealed an order, dated 11/1/2023 for Ciprofloxacin 500 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 12 hours for 7 days for a diagnosis of urinary tract infection. An observation was conducted on 11/6/2023 at 10:04 AM of Resident #455 in his room. Resident #455 was observed resting in bed with his urinary catheter drainage bag stored inside of a privacy bag hanging from the left side of the bed. The privacy bag was observed resting on the floor and the tubing for Resident #455's urinary catheter was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 10 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility procedures, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of respiratory equipment in accordance with professional standards of practice for two (Resident #92 and Resident #32) of two residents sampled for respiratory care. Findings included: A review of Resident #92's medical record revealed Resident #92 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and pneumonia. A review of Resident #92's physician's orders revealed an order, dated 10/26/2023 for oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. A review of Resident #92's care plan revealed a focus area initiated on 6/27/2023, Resident #92 had a potential for complications of respiratory distress related to COPD and shortness of breath when lying flat with an intervention to store respiratory equipment in an infection control bag when not in use and change every week and as needed. An observation was conducted on 11/6/2023 at 12:46 PM in Resident #92's room. Resident #92 was observed sitting in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-five medication administration opportunities were observed and eleven errors were identified for one (Resident #355) of three residents. These errors constituted a 44% medication error rate. Findings Include: On 11/08/23 at 10:55 a.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN) was conducted for Resident #355. Staff C dispensed the following medications: -Multivitamin tablet (one) -Aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) chewable (one) -Iron 65 mg tablet (one) -Lisinopril 5 mg tablet (one) -Plavix 75 mg tablet (one) -Cymbalta 30 mg tablet (one) -Meloxicam 7.5 mg tablet (one) -Miralax 75 grams (gr) (one) Ketoralac 0.5% eye drops (one drop in each eye) A review of Resident #355's November Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed medications were scheduled for 9:00 a.m. An interview with Staff C was conducted immediately after medication administration of Resident #355. Staff C admitted the medications were outside the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards by 1.) failing to ensure medications were securely stored and dispensed for two (Resident #83 and Resident #355) of thirty five sampled residents, 2.) failing to ensure one of six medication carts in the facility were kept locked when unattended by staff, 3.) failing to ensure medications were properly dated when opened in three of three medication carts, and 4.) failing to ensure medication carts were free of expired medications in one of three medication carts. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 11/7/2023 at 10:14 AM in Resident #83's room. A medication bottle containing over-the-counter medication was observed on Resident #83's bedside table. Resident #83 was not observed in the room at the time of the observation. An interview was conducted on 11/7/2023 at 1:27 PM with Resident #83. Resident #83 stated she brought the over-the-counter medication into the facility when she was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a dignified manner related to: 1) Staff standing when assisting residents with a meal for four (#81, #16, #15, and #19) of four residents observed; and 2) waiting for greater than 30 minutes for meal assistance for one resident (#19) of four residents observed. Findings included: During a facility tour on 09/02/21 at 09:12 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #81 being assisted with a breakfast meal. Staff W, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was observed standing by the resident's left side of the bed, while assisting her with meal. On 09/02/21 at 09:19 a.m., an interview was conducted with Staff W, CNA. Staff W stated she works this hall and knows the residents well. Staff W stated when assisting a resident, you don't have to sit. Staff W said, it is staff's preference, you can sit or stand if you like. When asked if she had received training related to assisting residents with meal, Staff W said, yes.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner, and food was stored appropriately related to maintenance of the ice machine, maintenance of the microwave, maintenance of the dish machine, and dating opened foods in the walk-in cooler. Findings included: On 08/31/21 at 9:35 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Kitchen Manager. During the tour, the inside of the ice machine was observed to have brown stains on both sides of the ice machine (photographic evidence obtained). The inside of the microwave was observed with a splattered brown substance (photographic evidence obtained). The policy provided by the facility Ice dated October 2019 revealed the following: Policy Statement It is the center policy that ice is prepared and distributed in a safe and sanitary manner. 2. The Dining Services Director will coordinate with the Maintenance Director to ensure that the ice machine will be disconnected, cleaned and sanitized quarterly and as needed, or according to manufacturer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, and a review of the policy and procedure Resident Mistreatment, Neglect and Abuse Prohibition Guidelines, the facility failed to ensure an alleged allegation related to abuse for one resident (Resident #32) out of the sampled twenty-nine residents was reported immediately to the governing agency in accordance with the State law. Findings included: A review of the admission Record for Resident #32 revealed that he was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of osteomyelitis. Other diagnosis included but was not limited to generalized anxiety disorder. Section C Cognitive Patterns of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #32 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 indicating that he was cognitively intact. On 09/01/21 at 9:05 a.m., Resident #32 was observed in his room sitting in the wheelchair next to the bed. Resident #32 reported about a week and a half ago, Staff T, Certified Nursing Assistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to take the appropriate actions in response to an alleged violation related to abuse inflicted by direct care staff such as thoroughly investigate the alleged violations to prevent further abuse, neglect, and mistreatment from occurring for one resident (Resident #32) out of the sampled twenty-nine residents. Findings included: A review of the admission Record for Resident #32 revealed that he was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of osteomyelitis. Other diagnosis included but was not limited to generalized anxiety disorder. Section C Cognitive Patterns of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #32 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 indicating that he was cognitively intact. On 09/01/21 at 9:05 a.m., Resident #32 was observed in his room sitting in the wheelchair next to the bed. Resident #32 reported about a week and a half ago, Staff T, Certified Nursing Assistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5.00%. A total of twenty-five medications were observed administered and two errors were identified for two (Resident #81 and #258) of five residents observed. These errors constituted a medication error rate of 8.00 percent. Findings included: On 09/02/2021 at 8:45 a.m., an observation was conducted of Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) administering medication to Resident #81. During the observation Staff A, LPN was observed administering Metoprolol Succinate ER (Extended-Release) 24 Hour 50 milligrams (MG) Give one (1) Tablet by one time a day for Diagnosis of Hypertension. The medication had on the pharmacy label Do not Crush. Staff A, LPN was observed to place the tablet in a clear packet and crushed the medication, and then placed them in apple sauce in a clear medication cup with other 9:00 a.m. medications and administered them to Resident #81. An immediate interview was conducted with Staff A, LPN, who revealed that she did realize they were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were secured appropriately, as evidenced by: 1) an unsecured and unattended box of medications on top of one (300 hall) of three medication carts observed; 2) loose and unidentified medications in two (100 hall and 300 hall) of three medication carts observed; and 3) staff personal items stored in one (100 hall) of three medication carts observed. Findings included: On 09/02/2021 at 9:45 a.m., Staff J, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)/Central Supply Technician was observed placing a box of Nicotine Transdermal System Step One Patches on top of the 100-hall medication cart and walking away. There were no staff nearby or in the vicinity of the medication cart. Several residents were observed to be self-propelling in wheelchairs nearby the medication cart which was located in a high traffic area on the 300 Hall. The surveyor was observed by Staff F, Regional Nurse Consultant and went over to the cart, and removed the medication from the top of the medication cart. In an immediate interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 09/01/21 at 09:22 a.m., a tour of hall 100 was conducted. An observation was made of Staff Z, CNA going room to room picking up breakfast trays from 09:22 a.m. to 09:32 a.m. Staff Z, was observed without wearing a gown in rooms noted with droplet precautions posted on the doors. Staff Z, went to room [ROOM NUMBER] walked out without tray, went to room [ROOM NUMBER] and grabbed a tray, then room [ROOM NUMBER], 105 and 107, grabbing trays. Staff Z then went back to room [ROOM NUMBER] and was there for 5 minutes and walked out with a tray. Staff Z was observed without a gown during the entire process and did not change gloves or use ABHR between room to room encounters. An interview was conducted with Staff Z on 09/01/21 at 09:32 a.m. Staff Z stated that she was going in to pick up trays and assist the residents who are finishing up with breakfast. Staff Z stated that she was an agency staff. When asked what the PPE expectation was, Staff Z said, I am supposed to put on a new gown and change gloves between each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FL SNF TRUST — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GULF SHORE NURSING HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/01/2023
FL MASTER OPCO HOLDCO II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2023
FL SNF TRUST IOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2023
FL SNF TRUST IIOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2023
SOLOMON, JULIEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/01/2023
GARFINKEL, ALLANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2023

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$10K
Related-party expense0% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 54%Medicare 32%Other / private 14%

This home reported $10K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$357per resident / day
operating cost
$10,860per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$399per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105978. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next