Madison Pointe Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 253 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 80.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 200 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 110.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-04-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (#210 and #211), assisted with care by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was free from verbal/psychosocial abuse. out of twelve residents sampled for abuse. Findings included: During an interview on 04/15/24 12:00 p.m., Resident #210 stated Staff A, CNA this weekend started using the F bomb and stated she was just not doing it over the weekend. Resident #210 stated Staff A, CNA also was on her phone with the earbuds talking to someone about threesomes. Resident #210's Family Representative (FR), present during the interview, also stated I didn't even go to work today, I came in because I am worried about my mom and her care. Resident #210's FR stated when she and Resident #210 reported Staff A, CNA over the weekend to Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) , Staff A, CNA ,after being reassigned, came back into Resident #210's room and asked what she did wrong. Resident #210 stated she felt very uncomfortable and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four dependent residents (#45, #43, #69, and #72) were provided with activities out of ten residents sampled. Findings Include: Multiple observations were made on 4/15/2024 at 10:00 a.m., 1:00 p.m., and 4:00 p.m., showing Resident #45 laying down in his bed dressed in a red shirt and newspapers spread out all over his bed. Resident # 45 was not able to communicate his needs. During an observation made on 04/16/204 at 10:30 a.m., and at 3:00 p.m., and on 4/17/2024 at 11:00 a.m. Resident #45 was observed laying down in his bed, dressed in the same red shirt for 3 days in a row. The same newspapers were observed for 3 days spread out all over his bed. Resident # 45 was not able to communicate his needs. Review of the medical record showed Resident #45 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Autistic Disorder, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, other mechanical complication of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, and the facility policy review, and the Plan of Correction review, the facility failed to ensure that it had a functioning Quality Assurance Committee. The facility was actively involved in the effective creation, implementation and monitoring of the plan of correction for deficient practice during a relicensure and complaint survey that was conducted on 4/15 - 4/18/24 and was cited at F880. On 6/11/24 a revisit survey was conducted, and the facility was recited at F880. The facility had developed a Plan of Correction with a completion date of 5/18/22. During the revisit survey the facility failed to 1. ensure staff members observed transmission-based precautions correctly related to the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for one (#1) out of 18 residents diagnosed with COVID-19, failed to appropriately dispose of PPE after assisting one (#2) out of 18 residents with transferring, failed to appropriately clean and disinfect a mechanical lift used for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective infection control program was implemented related to 1) the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for two of three designated transmission based precaution (TBP) rooms, 2) no hand hygiene provided to residents prior to meals for four of four hallways, and 3) the Infection Preventionist (IP) conducting appropriate surveillance for influenza. Findings included: During an interview on 04/15/24 at 1:20 p.m., Resident #209's Family Representative (FR) stated Resident #209 tested negative for influenza and the droplet precautions sign was placed on the door for his roommate who went out to the hospital. Resident #209's FR stated she did not know why the droplet precaution sign remained on Resident #209's door when he tested negative for influenza. (Photographic evidence obtained). An observation on 04/15/24 at 1:25 p.m., revealed Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) walked into Resident #209's room, past Droplet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility 1) failed to provide access to quality care related to a dignified meal service for three residents (# 69, #43, and #89) out of 13 residents reviewed for dining, and 2) failed to ensure a catheter was stored in a privacy bag for one resident (#43) out of 29 sampled residents. Findings included: On 4/15/24 at 10:00 a.m. Resident #69 was observed in his room in bed. The resident was observed with food on his chest area and beard from his breakfast meal, and a small flying insect on his beard. The resident stated he fed himself. He stated the staff clean him up When they get around to it. During the interview, the resident confirmed he did not know he had food pieces on his beard, chest, and clothing. He said, I am blind I can't see. The resident stated he had oatmeal for breakfast. He did not know how long ago. The food remnants were noted to be mushy in texture. An interview was conducted with Staff I, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on 4/15/24 at 10:12 a.m. She stated breakfast was served at 7:45 a.m. and Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a grievance was filed related to a resident's room changed for one resident (#87), out of eight residents sampled. Findings Include: During an observation made on 04/15/2024 at 10:45 AM., Resident #87 was observed laying down in her bed with her call light within reach. The Resident said she would like to have a room change because she doesn't get along with her roommate. She said she spoke to the Social Services Assistant multiple times about wanting to move to another room, but nothing has been done about it. During an observation made on 04/16/2024 at 12:00 PM., Resident #87 was observed sitting up in her wheelchair with a blanket placed over her lap. She stated she and her roommate got into a verbal fight last night and she really wants her room to change. She said she was not made aware of the facility grievance process. Review of the medical record showed Resident #87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal/psychosocial abuse for two residents (#210 and #211) out of twelve residents. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy Identifying Types of Abuse revised date 09/2022 showed, Mental and Verbal Abuse 1. Mental abuse is the use of verbal and non-verbal conduct which cause (or has the potential to cause) the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear , shame, agitation and degradation. 2. Verbal abuse may be considered to be a type of mental abuse. Verbal abuse includes the use of verbal written or gestured communication, or sounds, to residents within hearing distance, regardless of age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Psychosocial Outcomes 1. Some situations of abuse do not result in an observable physical injury or the psychosocial effects of abuse may not to be immediately apparent. 2. Abuse may result in psychological, behavioral, or psychosocial outcomes including, but not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, the facility failed to ensure Activity of Daily Living (ADL) assistance was provided to one resident (#45) out of ten residents sampled. Finding Include: On 4/15/2024 at 10:30 AM., Resident #45 was observed laying down in his bed dressed in a red shirt and newspapers spread out all over his bed. Resident #45 was not able to communicate his needs. On 04/16/204 and 4/17/2024, at 11:00 AM., Resident #45 was observed laying down in his bed, dressed in the same red shirt for 3 days in a row. The same newspapers were observed for 3 days spread out all over his bed. Resident #45 was not able to communicate his needs. Review of the medical record showed Resident #45 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses to include but not limited to Autistic Disorder, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, other mechanical complication of other Urinary Devices and Implants, Sequelae, and Down Syndrome, unspecified. Review of a Quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper orders and documentation were in the medical record for two residents (#10 and #255) out of twenty-nine sampled residents. Findings included: Review of Resident #10's care plan showed she was receiving hospice services. Review of Resident #10's physician orders did not show an active order in place for hospice services. There was a previous order for hospice, dated 5/31/22, which was discontinued on 6/6/22. Review of admission records showed Resident #10 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, psychotic disturbance, anxiety, and malnutrition. Review of Resident #10's hard chart and electronic medical record showed no documentation or notes from hospice services. An interview was conducted on 4/17/24 at 10:05 a.m. with Staff Q, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). She said Resident #10 was receiving hospice services. She pulled out the resident's hard chart and showed the hospice team and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure foot care was provided when needed for one resident (#69) out of one residents sampled. Findings included: During a facility tour on 04/15/24 at 10:10 a.m., Resident #69 was observed in his bed. His toe nails were observed with dark nail beds and black residue around the toe nails. An immediate interview was conducted with the resident who did not know what was wrong with his feet or toenails. He asked this surveyor what they looked like. He said, Lady, I am blind. I have not seen my feet or nails. He stated he did not know if the staff were applying anything to his feet. Review of a Primary Care Physician (PCP) progress note, dated 02/07/24, showed Resident #69 had a follow up visit chief complaint, At risk patient with long thickened painful nails. Patient is seen today for treatment of painful and thickened toenails bilateral feet. Patient has pain secondary to thickening and dystrophy of the infected (mycotic) nail plate.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not accommodate dietary preferences related to alternate meal requests for four residents (#351, #18, #352, and #86) out of 13 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. On 04/15/24 at 10:31 a.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #351 who stated food was not palatable. He said sometimes the food is cold. He described the supper last night, which was lima beans, carrots, and what he described as broth (but was supposed to be soup), fruit from a can, and no bread/crackers. He stated dietary comes by to get choices, but they never bring what he wants. He said follow up is nonexistent. On 04/15/24 at 12:52 p.m. resident #351 said, The food {expletive}. I don't like anything. He stated the food has no seasoning/salt. He described the lunch as very bland. The resident stated he was not offered an alternative even though he doesn't like the options. During the interview the roommate stated nobody asked if he wanted an alternate meal choice and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$33,413 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $33,413 — penalty dated 2024-04-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FL SNF TRUST — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $10K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL