Courtyards Of Orlando Care Center And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 90.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 115.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for medication administration for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration, of a total sample of 45 residents, (#112, #3, #94, #5, and #67).Findings:1. Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including esophagitis (inflammation of the esophagus) without bleeding, other psychoactive substance dependence, hypertension, nicotine dependence, chronic pain syndrome, opioid dependency, and anxiety. Review of the resident's care plan initiated 6/26/25 revealed a focus related to antianxiety medication use with an intervention to administer medication as prescribed. During a phone interview with the resident on 8/13/25 at 11:17 AM, he stated he had missed medications while at the facility. Review of resident #112's physician orders revealed an order for Xanax 1 milligram (mg) to be given twice a day for anxiety with a start date of 6/26/25 and end date of 7/10/25. Review of the Electronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper handling and food safety practices when staff failed to sanitize a food thermometer between checking food items, and ice bath calibration. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received a regular or puree diet by increasing the risk of cross-contamination and foodborne illness. Findings: On 8/13/25 at 11:10 AM, kitchen preparation for the lunch service began with cook G and Dietitian F present. At 11:37 AM, cook G used a food thermometer to check food temperatures of the prepared foods held on the steam table line prior to plating the food for service. The cook did not sanitize the food thermometer prior to placing the tip of the thermometer inside the pureed garlic bread, the regular garlic bread, and then the ziti bake. The cook said she cleans the thermometer between each food items. She acknowledged she did not sanitize the thermometer prior to checking the food items, nor had she cleaned it between the food items. The cook explained it was her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized care plan with interventions to address the resident's preference and needs for administration of oxygen for a resident who smokes, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care, of a total sample of 45 residents, (#40).Findings: Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), tachycardia (fast heartbeat), and mood disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Det, (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was assessed to be cognitively intact. On 8/11/25 at 10:54 AM, resident #40 was sitting in bed wearing a nasal cannula connected to an oxygen concentrator set to deliver oxygen at 5 liters per minute (LPM). Resident# 40 explained he liked to go out to smoke and felt he was comfortable without oxygen during that time. He continued that he had been on 5 LPM of oxygen for a few weeks, but explained he needed it more when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the necessary assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for one of three residents reviewed for ADL care, of a total sample of 45 residents, (#75). This failure resulted in resident #75 not receiving timely and adequate support for personal grooming and hygiene, which could contribute to a decline in the resident's physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: On 8/11/25 at 11:40 AM, resident #75 was awake, lying in his bed. His fingernails on both hands were elongated with brown debris visible under the nails. The resident stated he spoke Creole. He was able to answer yes/no questions appropriately, and able to gesture. Resident #75 indicated he preferred to keep his fingernails long by shaking his head to gesture no and showing his elongated fingernails. On 8/12/25 at 9:25 AM, resident #75's fingernails on both hands continued to be elongated with brown debris visible under the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0778 — isolated
  Help the resident make transportation arrangements to and from radiology services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist in making transportation arrangements to diagnostic and physician's appointments for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed for choices, of a total sample of 45 residents, (#97).Findings: A review of the electronic medical record revealed resident # 97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute embolism and thrombosis (blood clot) of other specified deep vein of the right lower extremity, paraplegia (partial paralysis), hyperlipidemia, and unspecified heart transplant status. Resident #97 's quarterly Minimum Data Set with an assessment reference date of 7/12/25 revealed the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status which indicated he was cognitively intact. A review of resident #97 's plan of care revealed he had the potential for complications related to an alteration in cardiac function due to his diagnoses, heart transplant status initiated on 4/23/25. Interventions included labs and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-19 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a refund, and a final accounting of the resident's funds deposited with the facility within 30 days of the resident's discharge, for 1 of 3 residents sampled for personal funds, (#1). Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility to the community on 6/27/24. Review of the facility's admission Agreement signed by resident #1's financial power of attorney on 1/13/22 revealed the facility would refund any deposits held by them within thirty days from the resident's date of discharge. Review of the facility's Policy and Procedure Manual in the section regarding Resident Personal Funds, issued 4/01/22 and revised 1/01/24, under the Procedure section item 6. Within thirty (30) days of a resident's discharge or death, the facility will refund the resident's personal funds and provide a final accounting of those funds to the resident, the resident's representative or to the resident's estate, as applicable. In a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0623 — pattern
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide written Notification of Transfer or Discharge forms to the Ombudsman for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalizations, out of a total sample of 45 residents, (#42, #79, #18, and #21). Findings: 1. Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include unspecified dementia, major depressive disorder, end stage renal disease and hypertension. The Minimum Data Set Annual Assessment noted resident #42 scored 3 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status evaluation which indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. A Nursing Home to Hospital Transfer Form dated 07/07/2023 revealed resident #42 had generalized weakness, and had a fall. Review of the medical record revealed resident #42 was in the hospital from [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. On 3/21/2024 at 10:18 AM, the Social Service Director (SSD) was unable to provide documentation of notice to the state Ombudsman of resident #42's emergent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident was evaluated for safe self-administration of medications and failed to obtain a physician order for self-administration of medication for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for choices, of a total sample of 45 residents, (#47). Findings: Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes type II, obstructive sleep apnea, atrial fibrillation, acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, hypertension, and major depressive disorder. The resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 12/12/23 revealed the resident's cognition was intact with a Brief Interview For Mental Status score of 14 out of 15. Observations on 3/18/24 at 11:52 AM, and on 3/19/24 at 10:04 AM showed resident # 47 lying in bed on her back. On the resident's tray table…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0568 — isolated
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to send quarterly personal fund account balance statements to resident's responsible party for 1 of 7 sampled residents reviewed for personal funds, out of a total sample of 45 residents, (#71). Findings: Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] for long term care. Her diagnoses included cerebral infarction, attention to gastrostomy, pressure ulcer- sacral region, dementia, epilepsy, seizures, sepsis, hypertensive heart, and chronic kidney disease. A review of the census information revealed resident #71's payor source was Medicaid as of 8/28/23. A review of the medical record revealed admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] which showed her Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 00 which meant she was severely cognitively impaired. Her quarterly MDS assessments dated 11/15/23 and 2/15/24 showed she was rarely/never understood, had both long term and short-term memory problems, and had severely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation for code status Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) matched the clinical records for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Advance Directives, of a total sample of 45 residents, (#47). Findings: Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes type II, obstructive sleep apnea, atrial fibrillation, acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, hypertension, and major depressive disorder. Review of the resident's clinical records revealed a physician order dated 3/16/24 for Full Code status. The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) banner noted full code status. Scanned documents revealed a canary yellow form State of Florida Do Not Resuscitate Order dated 9/11/23, signed by the resident, and physician on 9/11/23. Review of the DNR Binder located at the nurses' station on the B Wing revealed a State…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FL SNF TRUST — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $10K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL