Treasure Isle Care Center
1735 N Treasure Drive, North Bay Village, FL 33141 · Non profit - Corporation · 176 certified beds · (305) 865-2383 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (23% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.6% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.2% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.2% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.5% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.1% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.9% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.9% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 3.2% | 10.5% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 28.2% | 8.6% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.1% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.7% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.81 | 2.13 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.46 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
25.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 74% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 25.4%CMS range 14.6–44.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 7.1–15.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 59.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.3%CMS range 5.8–13.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.21 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 166.6 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-02 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations interview and record review, the facility failed to their Quality Assurance Performance Improvement policy and demonstrate effective plan of actions were implemented to correct identified quality deficiencies in the problem area as evidenced by repeated deficient practices for F550-Resident Rights/Exercise of Rights and F761- Labeling of Drugs and Biologicals, F689 Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, F880 Infection Prevention and Control and F867 QAPI/QAA Improvement Activities. The findings included: Review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a recertification survey with exit dated 07/24/2024 deficient practice was identified for F550-Resident Rights/Exercise of Rights and F761- Labeling of Drugs and Biologicals, F689 Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices, F880 Infection Prevention and Control and F867 QAPI/QAA Improvement Activities. During this survey with exit date of 10/02/2025, the facility was cited for F550-Resident Rights/Exercise of Rights and F761- Labeling of Drugs and Biologicals, F689 Free of Accident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control standards were followed as evidenced by nebulizer mask noted uncovered, dirty call light on Resident#15's bed, nebulizer machine on the floor, Resident #5's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag inside a trash. There were 160 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey During observation on 09/29/2025 at 09:25 AM, a respiratory mask as noted at Resident # 120's bedside observed without a storage bag. Photographic evidence attached. On 09/30/2025 11:21 AM Resident seated in wheelchair at doorway, alert and watching TV with no distress observed. Liquid within reach. Nebulizer mask not visible at bedside. On 10/01/2025 10:58 AM Resident sleeping in wheelchair near doorway, no distress observed. Liquid at bedside, privacy curtain in place. Empty urinal noted at bedside. Nebulizer mask not visible. Review of the medical records for Resident #120 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure one resident (Resident #159) out of eight sampled residents was treated with respect and dignity as evidenced by Resident #159 was observed wearing his shirt inside out. 2) During lunch, Resident #159 did not receive his lunch tray in a timely manner while his roommate had already received lunch and finished eating. 3) Facility staff identified residents requiring assistance with meals as feeders.The findings include. Observation on 09/30/2025 at 9:15 AM, revealed Resident #159 awake in bed, wearing a blue shirt inside out. At 10:20 AM on the same day, Resident #159 seated in a wheelchair, still wearing the shirt inside out. At 11:47 AM Resident #159 noted in the hallway, seated in a wheelchair, with the shirt still inside out.On 09/30/2025 at 12:30 PM, Resident #159 was observed in his room seated in a wheelchair still wearing his shirt inside out waiting to be served lunch while his roommate was already served.On 09/30/2025, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an advance directive for one (Resident #151) out of seven residents sampled; as evidence by: Resident #151 did not have an advance directive care plan or acknowledgement form in his chart. There were 160 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey.During observation and record review on 09/30/2025 1:51 PM the residents advance directives was not located in the electronic chart.On 10/02/2025 03:00 PM, an advance directive care plan was unable to be located electronically.On 10/02/2025 03:20 PM, the facility's Social Services Director presents an advanced directive acknowledgement form with the signature of the resident, dated 10/01/2025. Review of the medical records for Resident #151 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses included but not limited to Cerebral infarction due to embolism of left posterior cerebral artery.Review of Resident #151's Physician's Orders Sheet for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate notices for one (Resident #175) out of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The resident received the notice after they were discharged from the facility. There were 160 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey.The findings included:Record review of the Beneficiary Notice Initiative Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) Policy and Procedure effective May 2012 documented: 4) When to Deliver the NOMNC: A. Must give an advance, completed copy of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC to Medicare beneficiaries/Medicare Advantage enrollees receiving covered skilled services no later than two days before the termination of services.Review of the Demographic Face Sheet for Resident #175 documented the resident was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, epilepsy, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder and hyperlipidemia. The resident was discharged from the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews facility failed to submit a [NAME] II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for a one (Resident #121) out of one sampled resident with a serious mental disorder as evidenced by a record review of a Level I PASRR indicating a Level II to be completed and no Level II was done. There were 161 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey.The findings included: On 9/29/25 at 10:42 AM Resident#121 observed seated in a wheelchair near bed. No apparent distress noted.Record review of a demographic sheet for Resident #121 revealed an admission date of - 6/26/23 with diagnosis that included: Bipolar disorder, Anxiety and Major depressive disorder.Record review of an Annual Minimum Data Set reference dated 7/3/25 revealed Residet#121 was not considered by the state level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition, had diagnosis that included: Anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper positioning to prevent choking and aspiration for one (Resident #108) out of three sampled residents observed during dining; as evidenced by Resident #108 who has a diagnosis of Dysphagia Oropharyngeal Phase (difficulty swallowing) was noted in bed lying flat eating his lunch meal increasing the risk of food or liquid entering his airway leading to complications that include but not limited to aspiration pneumonia. The findings include: Observation on 09/30/2025 at 12:36 PM revealed Resident #108 lying flat in bed eating in his lunch meal.On 09/30/2025 at 12:37 PM Staff I, Certified Nursing Assistant, entered the room and the surveyor asked about Resident #108's position while eating his meal. Staff I, C N A reported the meal tray and set up was done by another staff and stated: This resident is a [requires assistants with eating], and we usually feed him. He like when [Staff P] feeds him. Staff I, CN A attempted to assist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation records reviewed and interviews, the facility's staff failed to ensure a safe environment free of potential accidents and hazards for two out of three sampled residents, as evidenced by observation a knife in Resident #15's room on the windowsill and Resident #21 in possession of cigarettes. This deficiency increases the risk of negative outcomes that could affect all occupants in the facility. The findings include. Observation on 09/29/2025 at 9:40 AM, Resident #21 noted seated in an electric wheelchair in his room, with cigarettes visible in an open accessory bag (photographic evidence). Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff Q revealed that the resident goes out on pass and returns with the cigarettes. At 10:30 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was shown the cigarettes in the open accessory attached to the right side of the wheelchair. The ADON immediately acknowledged the concern and informed the resident that he is not allowed to have cigarettes in his possession. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews, the facility staff did not properly position an indwelling urinary tubing to facilitate the flow of urine for one (Resident #21) out of two sampled residents with an indwelling urinary catheter. As evidenced by; Resident #21's indwelling catheter tubing was positioned above the bladder and kinked. This improper practice prevented urine from freely flowing and increasing the risk for catheter-associated urinary tract infections and other serious medical issues. At the time of this survey, eleven residents with indwelling urinary catheters resided in the facility.The findings include. On 09/29/2025 at 9:32 AM, staff completed Resident #21's morning care, the indwelling catheter tubing was noted coiled on the bed. At 9:38 AM, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) Staff Q and M used a mechanical lift to transfer Resident #21 from the bed to an electric wheelchair, positioning the indwelling catheter's tubing curled between the resident's legs.Record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #21 on 06/07/2025 with clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate were 5% or lower as evidenced by an error rate of 64.29 % out of 28 opportunities. There were 160 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey.The findings included:On 09/30/25 at 10:27 AM, a medication observation was completed with Staff F, RN on the Section 4 medication cart #1 for Resident #108. Staff F, RN revealed Resident #108 takes medicine by mouth in a whole form. Staff F, RN performed hand hygiene and verified each medication according to the physician's order and placed the following medications into a cup:1. Amlodipine 5 mg, po, 1 tab, once a day2. Lisinopril 10 mg, 1 tab, daily, po3. Procardia 90 mg xl, po, once daily, 1 tab4. Metformin 500 mg, po, 1 tab, twice a day 5 Multivitamin, 1 tab, po, once a day6. Lactulose 30 ml, liquid, po, twice a day7. Juven 1 packet, powder mix in 240 ml water, po, twice a dayThe nurse locks the cart and screen, performs hand hygiene, and dons gloves and gown.Vital signs: BP 120/62, HR 105.The nurse disinfects the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals are stored in accordance with professional standards in keep the unit one medication storage room and three medications: as evidence by twelve expired Nutritional Supplement in the medication storage room on unit one and expired insulin on medication cart three. There were 160 residents that resided in the facility at the time of survey.The findings include: On 09/29/2025 at 02:45 PM, the medication storage room in unit 1 was observed with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). It was revealed that the medication log was signed for daytime on 09/29/25. Twelve Nutritional Supplement feedings were found to be expired, with an expiration date of 05/01/2025 (photo evidence available). Termite and rodent droppings were observed in the cabinets. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 10/02/2025 at 06:26 PM stated Expired medications should never be present in the medication carts or medication storage rooms. On 9/29/25 at 3:50 PM, during a medication storage check on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews, the facility failed to ensure privacy of confidential information on three (units three, four and five) out of five nursing stations as evidenced by an unattended unlocked computer screen with information visible and information was on top of a treatment cart. The findings included: Observation on 7/23/25 at 6:50 AM of the unit three nursing station revealed an unattended unlocked computer screen with visible resident information. (Photographic evidence). The surveyor notified Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) who was on the unit away from the computer at the time of observation. Staff C, LPN was asked about the facility's protocol for protecting resident information and stated: When I am away from the computer the screen should be turned off to protect residents' information. On 7/23/25 at 6:55 AM an observation on unit four nursing station revealed a document with Resident information was left on top of a treatment cart in the hallway unattended. (Photographic evidence). The surveyor notified Staff D, LPN and asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews facility failed to protect one (Resident #1) out of three sampled residents' right to be free from abuse and neglect, as evidenced by a staff member witnessed Resident #1 being physically abused (slapped on the buttocks) during hygiene. The findings included:On 7/14/25 a federal report of allegation of abuse was received. The facility reported an incident of Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse witnessing Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) slap Resident #1 on the buttocks during hygiene care. The facility suspended the alleged perpetrator, investigated and notified the required government authorities, physician and family member of Resident #1. The facility concluded that the incident was verified. On 7/23/25 at 7:30 AM Resident #1 in bed, eyes closed, no apparent distress; at 1:00 PM Resident#1 observed in a recliner in room speaking incoherently. Record review of a demographic sheet revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: Cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews, the facility failed to properly secure medications on two (Units 1 and 5 out of five Nursing Units as evidenced by an unattended unlocked medication cart on Unit one and medication left on top of an unattended medication cart on Unit five. There were 162 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey The findings included: On 7/23/25 at 6:58 am An observation was made on Nursing unit 1 of an unlocked unattended medication cart on (photographic evidence). The Surveyor notified Staff F, supervisor Registered Nurse (RN) who was in the hallway away from cart. The surveyor asked Staff F, supervisor Registered Nurse (RN) about the facility's protocol for storing medication and Staff F, RN replied, The cart should be locked when I am not in front of it. On 7/23/25 at an observation was made on Nursing Unit five unattended medication cart on top of the medication cart (photographic evidence). The Surveyor notified Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and asked about the facility's protocol for storing medication and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations records reviewed and interview , used the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control practices; as evidence by several observations revealed residents' rooms were cluttered, had open food items, spoiled food items, linen observed on floor, dirty bathroom and showers, urinal on floor with urine seen from hallway, soiled gauze pads observed on resident's nightstand, used syringe, suction tubing and disposable gown on top of residents' wardrobe, staff failure to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), drainage bag for indwelling catheter on floor, empty food container in residents' room swarmed with flies, soiled floors and trash on floors, increasing the potential for the contracting and spreading of diseases. The findings include. On 03/03/2025 starting at 7:10 AM, during observational tour of the facility; infection prevention and control concerns identified included but not limited to several residents' rooms were noted unorganized, cluttered, dirty bathrooms, soiled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents residing in the facility had a safe clean and clutter free environment; as evidenced by observations of several residents that included but not limited to: Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #11 and Resident #12 call lights were not within the residents reach in the event immediate assistance is needed. (photographic evidence). 2)The facility failed to ensure residents' rooms were organized in a manner that provided a pest free and safe environment. 3} The facility failed to ensure emergency exits were clear and unobstructed. (photographic evidence) The findings include: On 03/03/2025 during multiple observations conducted between the hours 7:29 AM to 8:32 AM revealed call lights were out of reach for several residents that included but not limited to Resident # 4, Resident #6, Resident # 7, Resident # 8, Resident #11 and Resident # 12. Observations on 03/03/2025 at 11:54 AM revealed call lights remained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records review and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate respiratory care and services for two residents, (Resident #4 and Resident # 5) as evidenced by failure to ensure oxygen was being administered at the correct flow rate ordered. (Photographic evidence) The findings include. On 03/03/2025 at 8:16 AM Resident # 4 was observed in bed awake with oxygen at a flow rate of 4 Liters Per Minute (LPM) via nasal cannula. Review of Resident #4's clinical records revealed the resident was initially admitted [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Exacerbation, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Shortness Of Breath (SOB). Review of the Physicians orders for March 2025 revealed the resident should be receiving oxygen at 2 LPM PRN (as needed) for SOB. Observation on 03/03/2025 at 12:01 PM, Resident # 4 was awake in bed with oxygen at a flow rate of 4 LPM. On 03/03/2025 at 8:17 AM, Resident # 5 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to demonstrate effective plan of actions were implemented to correctly identify quality deficiencies in the problem area related to repeated deficient practices for F880 Infection Prevention & Control. These deficient practices have the potential to affect 168 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Record review of Quality Assessment and Assurance (QA & A) Compliance policy and procedure (effective date July 2022). The purpose of the committees is to review and analyze facility related data, evaluate improvement plans effectiveness and direct appropriate actions for the facility response. Systems failures and/or in-depth analysis of processes are addressed through development of a QAPI. QAPI requires a systematic review of data, identification of the root cause(s) of the systems failure and implementation of corrective actions. Review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a recertification survey with exit dated June 13, 2024, F880 Infection Prevention & Control was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespreadEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure safety for all residents the residents in the facility as evidence by a knife was observed in one (Resident #46) out of eight residents sampled. Staff failed to intervene in a timely manner during an argument between two residents (Resident #128 and Resident #170) that enabled Resident #170 to strike Resident #128, which led to Resident #170 being arrested by local law enforcement. The facility's incidents by incident types report from January 2023 to June 10, 2024 revealed there were six alleged abuse incidents and nine incidents of resident-to-resident altercation. There were 136 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. The findings include. 1) During initial observation on 6/10/2024 at 9:15 AM in the room shared between Resident #115, Resident # 46, Resident # 130 and Resident #138, it was noted upon entrance that a small white pill was on the floor (photo taken). observation of Resident # 46's top drawer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations interview and record review, the facility failed to their Quality Assurance Performance Improvement policy and demonstrate effective plan of actions were implemented to correct identified quality deficiencies in the problem area related to repeated deficient practices for F550-Resident Rights/Exercise of Rights and F725 Sufficient Nursing Staff. The findings included: Review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a recertification survey with exit dated January 12, 2023 the facility was cited F550-Resident Rights/Exercise of Rights based on staff failure to ensure dignity during dining and F725 Sufficient Nursing Staff. During this survey with exit date of June 13, 2024, the facility was cited F550-Resident Rights/Exercise of Rights related to staff standing while feeding a resident (Resident #131) and observation of two residents (Resident #27 and Resident #473) wearing hospital type gowns in dining area and F725 Sufficient Nursing Staff. On 6/13/2024 at 3:02 PM Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) overview was conducted with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a splint device was in place for one resident (Resident #131) out of one resident reviewed for splint devices and range of motion. There were nine residents in the facility that required splint devices. The findings include. On 06/10/24 at 8:12 AM Resident #131 was observed in bed on his left side. There was a blue hand splint device on the side table and the resident had a rolled washcloth in his left hand. The resident is non-verbal. On 6/10/2024 at 10:23 AM Resident #131 was observed in bed on his left no splint device in place. On 06/10/2024 at 11:07 AM Resident #131 was observed in bed on his left side with the splint device on the left hand. On 06/10/2024 at 12:15 PM Resident # 131 was observed in bed on his left side a rolled was cloth was in his left hand. On 06/11/2024 at 8:02 AM Resident on his left side with one rolled wash cloth in the left hand. On 06/11/2024 at 10:05 AM, Staff B a Certified Nursing Assistant was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to provide services to residents. This deficient practice has potential to affect 168 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: During multiple observations starting on 06/11/2024-06/13/2024, residents were observed sitting in the activity area, with urine odor and residents wearing the night gowns at the time for breakfast. It was observed resident in bed waiting to be bathed and dressed around mid-morning. During multiples observations starting on 06/11/2024 through 06/13/2024, the nursing boards were posted with enough nursing staffing for current census following regulations. Interview with Staff A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on 06/13/24 at 11:40 AM She stated she has been working in the facility for 30 years. She stated she is not happy with the workload that she had, she had 15 residents almost every day. She stated she had 3 or 4 residents they care for themselves, but she must supervise them, the rest of the residents needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the pantry refrigerator in Section 1 used exclusively for all resident's food contained foods that were labeled with the resident's name and dated. This has the potential to affect one-hundred and forty-five residents out of one hundred and sixty-nine residents who eat orally residing in the facility. The findings included: Record review of the Safe Handling, Storage and Reheating for Food From Visitors or Outside Source Policy and Procedure (effective date March 2022); Policy Statement-Residents will be assisted in properly storing and safely consuming food items brought into the facility for residents by visitors; Procedure: 1) The facility staff will request that visitors bringing in food, and/or residents that receive food, must notify a member of the nursing or activities departments. This information is located in the resident handbook; Later Consumption: When food items are intended for later consumption, the nursing staff will: 1) Ensure the food item(s) are in a sealed container, stored in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow infection control standards and transmission-based precautions to prevent the spread of infections as evidenced by observations of trash in hallways and Staff not donning appropriate Protective Equipment before entering Resident #136's room. There were 136 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: On 06/10/2024 at 6:41 AM, a bag of trash was observed on the floor in nursing section four in front of a residen's room. (see photo evidence) On 6/11/2024 at 9:45 AM Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN) was observed entering room without donning appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). Staff F, RN stopped by surveyor and asked if it was according to protocol to enter without donning gloves for a resident under contact precaution and Staff F, RN replied: No, according to the sign I am supposed to don gloves before I enter the room. On 6/11/2024 at 10:00 AM Staff G, charge nurse revealed, staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 residents (Resident # 131, Resident #27 and Resident #473) out of 33 sampled residents were treated in a dignified manner as evidenced by the facility's staff was observed standing while feeding Resident #131. Furthermore Resident # 27 and Resident #473 were not dressed in their own clothing, rather than hospital gowns, to promote dignity. The findings included. Resident #131 On 06/10/2024 at 8:50 AM, during an observation, Resident #131 was observed in bed slouched leaning to the left while Staff L, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was standing while feeding Resident # 131. There was a chair on the left side of the bed with a plastic bag containing linen and other items, there were individual storage areas in the room for each resident occupying room At 9:00 AM Staff B entered the room and assisted Staff L to pull Resident #131 up in the bed. At 9:05 AM Staff L was asked about her standing while feeding the resident,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a delivered package for one resident (Resident #118) out of one resident reviewed was received by the resident in a timely manner. The delivered package contained frozen foods and they were defrosted and spoiled when delivered to the resident. This has the potential to affect 169 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. The findings included: Record review of the Mail Resident/Patient/Employee Policy and Procedure (effective dated June 2013); Policy-Mail, flowers, gifts and packages are delivered unopened daily to individual resident/patient rooms; Procedure: 5) Deliver mail, flowers, gifts and packages unopened to the resident/patient's room in a timely manner. Review of the Safe Handling, Storage and Reheating for Food From Visitors or Outside Source Policy and Procedure (effective date March 2022); Policy Statement-Residents will be assisted in properly storing and safely consuming food items brought into the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #131) out of 33 sampled resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded as evidence by Resident #131 use of a splint device was not accurately coded on the MDS. There were nine residents in the facility that required splint devices. The findings included. Review of clinical records revealed Resident # 131 a vulnerable resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses include but not limited to Osteomyelitis of the vertebrae and communication deficit. Record review of orders and the Medication Administration Records for June 2024 revealed active orders for Right hand Range of Motion and mobility. Order dated 5/25/2023, Splinting: Ensure right hand splint is applied daily as tolerated. May remove for care or skin sweep. On before breakfast time, off after lunch time. Review of Resident #131's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] Section O for Special Treatments,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I PASRR was not completed for residents (Resident # 103, Resident # 108) and Level II PASRR was not requested for Resident # 164, out of five residents investigated. This deficiency had the potential to affect 168 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Resident # 108 During multiple observations starting on 06/11/2024-06/13/2024, Resident #108 was in the room in bed sleeping, or awake. Call light was always in reach, and distress or anxiety was noted. The resident never responded to questions asked. Record review of the clinical records for Resident # 108 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses include, but not limited to, Other intervertebral Disk Degeneration, Lumbar Region; Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity with Other Behavioral Disturbance;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation record review and interviews, the facility's staff failed to implement the care plan to prevent further decline in the resident's range of motion and maintain skin integrity as evidence by failure to ensure splint devices is in place for one resident (Resident #131) out of one resident reviewed for splint devices and range of motion. There were nine residents in the facility that required splint devices, and failed to reposition Resident #131 at a minimum of two hours. The findings include. On 06/10/24 at 8:12 AM Resident #131 was observed in bed on his left side. There was a blue hand splint device on the side table and the resident had a rolled washcloth in his left hand. The resident is non-verbal. On 6/10/2024 at 10:23 AM Resident #131 was observed in bed on his left side. On 06/10/2024 at 11:07 AM Resident #131 was observed in bed on his left side with the splint device on the left hand. On/6/10/2024 at 12:15 PM Resident # 131 was observed in bed on his left side. On 06/11/2024 at 8:02…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary interventions, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing of pressure ulcers for one resident (Resident #146) out of eight sampled residents as evidenced by observations of Resident#146 in supine position for more than 2 hours. There were 27 Residents with wounds residing in the facility. The findings included: On 06/10/2024 at 10:38 AM Resident#146 was observed in supine position on an air mattress. On 06/10/2024 at 12:25 AM, Resident #146 was observed in a supine position on an air mattress. On 06/12/2024 at 8:06 AM Resident #146 was observed in supine position on an air mattress. 06/12/2024 10:02 AM, the wound care nurse entered Resident #146's room to perform wound care. Upon entering the room Resident #146 was observed in supine in bed. The wound care nurse performed the wound care as per physician's order assisted by Staff I, Certified Nursing assistant (CNA). The resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations record review and interview the facility failed to provide foot care according to professional standard for one (Resident #35) out of eight residents sampled. The findings included. On 06/10/2024 at 7:10 AM Resident #35 was observed in bed, his toenails were observed long and curling over the top of his toes. On 06/11/2024 at 9:02 AM Resident #35 was observed in bed awake with no socks or shoes on; his toenails were long and curved over. Resident # 35 was asked if he had seen the podiatrist for his feet and had his toenails been trimmed since his admission into facility. Resident #35 stated: No never done here. Review of his clinical records revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. With diagnoses that include but not limited to type two diabetes, difficulty walking and acute bilateral embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep vein lower extremity. Review of Resident #35 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Section C for Cognitive Pattern documented the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews facility failed to dispose of medication as per policy for one resident (Resident #50) and facility failed to keep an accurate reconciliation of controlled narcotics for two residents (Resident #141 and Resident #99 ) out of eight residents sampled as evidenced by an observation of staff member disposing of a medicated patch into the trash can in a resident's room and review of two narcotic count sheets with totals that did not match amount of pills in the corresponding bingo cards. There were 136 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: On 06/10/2024 at 9:00 AM a medication administration observation was conducted with Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN) in nursing section five Staff F, RN removed a previous patch from Resident 50's skin and disposed of it in the trash can in the room. Staff F, RN completed the medication pass with Resident #50 and left the room. The surveyor asked Staff F, RN if disposing of patch in the resident's trash can was within the policy and procedure and Staff F, RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews facility failed to properly store drugs and biologics, as evidenced by an observation of unattended normal saline filled syringes in one resident's room (Resident #131) out of one resident observed for Intravenous (IV) medication administration. The facility failed to ensure expired treatment and biological supplies were discarded in one out of one medication storage room. The facility has only one medication storage room. The findings included: 1) On [DATE] at 9:43 AM a medication administration observation was conducted with Staff H, Registered Nurse, (RN) in nursing section two on medication cart one. On [DATE] at 9:48 AM Staff H, RN entered Resident#131's room and placed the Intravenous (IV) medication on the side table next to the resident, then entered bathroom and performed hand hygiene, leaving the IV medication on the side table out of direct vision. On [DATE] at 9:49 AM Staff H, RN returned to resident's bedside and surveyor asked if medication can be left out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing for 2 ( unit 2 and unit 3) out of 5 units. This had the potential to affect the 89 residents who resided in those units out of the 169 residents residing in the facility during this survey. The finding included: Upon entering the facility on 01/09/2023 at 6:00 AM, while the surveyors were in the lobby area the kitchen manager asked the team to wait in the lobby before entering the facility. After waiting in the lobby area for ten minutes, the team entered the facility towards the residents' rooms and no staff was observed leaving or entering the facility through the main door. At the time, there was a male staff from kitchen observed by surveyors who was also waiting in the lobby area. Observation on Unit 3 on 01/09/23 at 6:11 AM revealed the staffing information board did not have information for current staff working, the board only had the unit manager's name from day shift, census, and break times. At the time of this observation there was only one (1) nurse (Staff G, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-12 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have daily nurse staffing posted prior to the beginning of shifts on 5 of 5 nursing stations. This had the potential to affect the 169 residents who resided in the facility at the time of this survey. The findings included: During an observation at unit 1 nurse's station, on 01/09/23 at 6:06 AM, it was noted that the staffing information posted was dated Saturday, 01/08/23 for the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift not for the current 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift. (Photo Evidence) During an observation at unit 2 nurse's station, on 01/09/23 at 6:11 AM, it was noted that the staffing information posted was dated Saturday, 01/07/23. (Photo Evidence) During an observation at unit 3 nurse's station, on 01/09/23 at 6:08 AM, it was noted that staffing information was missing. The only information posted was the unit manager for the day shift, break times, and census. (Photo Evidence) During observation at unit 5 nurse's station, on 01/09/23 at 6:10 AM, it was noted that the staffing posted was dated 1/7/23, Census 17, Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one ( Resident # 7) out of one resident observed during dining, was treated with respect and dignity, by not serving meals to all residents seated and the same dining table during meals; as evidenced by Resident # 7 meals were not served her meals at the same time as the other resident seated at the same table was served and being assisted with eating by facility staff. This deficient practice has a potential to affect the health and wellbeing of all the residents who eat by mouth and may need assistance with eating. The finding included: On 01/09/22 at 08:23 AM Resident #7 was observed in the dining room sitting at a dining table that she shared with another resident. Resident #7 was not served her meal, but the other resident was served her meal and was being assisted with eating by staff, while Resident # 7 was sitting without her meal. Observation on 01/09/23 at 01:40 PM revealed Resident #7 was in the dining room, sitting at the dining table that she shared with another resident. The food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation of resident's Advanced Directives for 2 (Resident #94 and Resident #120) of 34 sampled residents. This had the potential to affect the 169 residents in the facility receiving care and services at the time of this survey. The findings included: 1. Review of the medical records for Resident #94 revealed the Advance Directive (AD) in the care plan reference date 12/13/22 documented resident/authorized responsible party request Full Code wish to be honored. On 1/10/23 at 2:45 PM physical copies of Resident #94' Advance Directives given to the surveyor by the facility's Social Services Director (SSD) revealed, Advance Directive for Resident #94 dated 11/05/2022 documented Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), signed by MD (Medical Doctor). Further review of the medical records for Resident #94 revealed, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses included but not limited to: Unspecified Sequelae of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SENIOR HEALTH SOUTH — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SENIOR HEALTH PROPERTIES SOUTH, INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/30/2000 |
| SENIOR HEALTH SOUTH EX LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 04/23/2025 |
| DEPIANO, RICH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/01/2014 |
| JAFFE, HOWARD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/01/2014 |
| MULLEN, ANN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/01/2014 |
| RICHMOND, PENNY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/01/2014 |
| ANU HEALTH MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/15/2025 |
| CONSULTING SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2025 |
| FACILITY SUPPORT COMPANY, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2025 |
| KANE FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/24/2025 |
| BROWN, LUCRETA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/15/2019 |
| TUCKER, HEIDI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2019 |
| OMEGA HEALTHCARE INVESTORS, INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2003 |
| SELECT REHABILITATION, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/19/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $214K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105408. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-10-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.