No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Whispering Oaks

1514 E Chelsea St, Tampa, FL 33610 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 236 certified beds · (813) 238-6406 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (813) 238-6406 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Nov 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4620 N 22nd St · (813) 397-5300 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4407 N Nebraska Ave · (813) 443-0775 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5010 N 15th St · (813) 238-1458 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Robert L Cole Sr Community Lake Park, 4100 N 17th St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1608 E Genesee St

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.7%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.5%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.1%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.6%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.2%14.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control2.0%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.7%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.6%26.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.6%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.342.131.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.191.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
19.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.49U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 19.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 81 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.3%CMS range 30.1–52.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.5%CMS range 6.2–11.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge19.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge25.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge16.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting93.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 4.0–9.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.311.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.77
RN hours/ resident / day
0.47
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.33
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.80
RN hoursweekends
30.9%
Total nursing turnover
38.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 236 beds and averages 229.6 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.80 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-12)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2023-08-24)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete and submit for review the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II upon acquiring new or qualifying mental health diagnoses for 6 residents (#24, #7, #84, #6, #4 and #241) out of 11 residents sampled for PASARRs.Findings included: 1.) Review of the admission record for Resident #24 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, bipolar, major depressive disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the resident's record revealed a level I PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) dated 12/5/23. The level I PASARR showed question 6 was marked No to indicate the individual did not have a serious mental illness. The review showed a level II PASARR was not submitted for consideration. 2.) Review of the admission record for Resident #7 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARRs) for residents with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability with qualifying mental health diagnosis, were completed accurately for 5 residents (#7, #84, #11, #208, and #241) of 11 residents sampled.Findings included: 1. Review of the admission record for Resident #7 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include Bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, seizures, and personal history of traumatic brain injury (TBI).Review of a Level I PASARR for Resident #7 dated 10/30/24 reveled in section B the seizure and TBI diagnoses were not checked. The level I PASARR showed question 6 was marked No to indicate the individual did not have a related neurocognitive disorder, a serious mental illness or intellectual disability. The review showed the level I PASARR was incomplete and level II PASARR was not submitted for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview and facility policy review, the facility did not ensure the kitchen was maintained in a safe and sanitary manner related to food storage, cross contamination of food prep surfaces, general cleanliness and maintaining appropriate dishwashing sanitization levels in one kitchen (main) of one observed.Findings included: On 02/09/2026 at 8:39 AM to 9:15 AM a kitchen tour was conducted with the facility's Registered Dietician (RD) with the following observations made: An observation was made of brown-grease stains and built-up grime above the stove. The Kitchen Manager /Cook (KM) stated this was just from this morning. The RD stated, I see it. It should be clean. An observation was made of a personal water bottle on the Cook's prep station, noted half empty. The RD stated it should not be there and proceeded to remove it. An observation was made of a ceiling vent with dirt, debris and brown matter. The ceiling vent was located above the cooking area. The RD stated he would put in a work order to get it cleaned. An observation was made of the filter in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to control the spread on infection related to: 1. failing to ensure the proper isolation signage was posted for one (Resident #246) of five residents sampled; 2. failing to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was available and hand hygiene was performed in room [ROOM NUMBER]; 3. failing to ensure proper placement of medical equipment to prevent infection; and 4: failing to ensure 3 (Staff U, Staff V, and the DON) of 3 staff fingernails did not create a safety or infection control issue.Findings include: 1. Resident #246 was observed in her room resting in bed. An observation was made of a Contact Precautions sign posted on the door. There was no PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) observed on the door or nearby. The sign revealed a STOP sign with the following information:Everyone must: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Put on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure an assessment for self-administration related to enteral feedings was completed for one resident (#16) out of one resident reviewed.Findings included: On 02/10/2026 at 4:15 p.m., a medication administration was observed for Resident #16 by assigned nurse, Staff Q, Registered Nurse (RN). On 02/10/2026 at 5:10 p.m., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident #16 in his room. Resident #16 stated he had not received his 4:00 p.m. scheduled dose of Jevity. The resident stated he would take care of it. Resident #16 was observed walking to the sink, filling a cup with tap water, returned to his bed, sat on the edge and opened a small commercial eight-ounce container of Jevity 1.5, and poured into another cup. An observation was made of Resident#16's bedside table with three unopened boxes of Jevity 1.5 eight-ounce containers. Resident #16 was observed administering his Jevity along with flushes of water. Resident #16 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment was provided related to the use of a fan for one resident (#34) out of one resident observed.Findings included: An observation and interview on 2/9/2026 at 8:35 A.M. revealed Resident #34 lying in bed. A box fan approximately 21-23 inches in height was observed in between the resident's headboard and pillow. The pillow was observed resting on the box fan, next to the resident's head. The box fan was not running at the time. Resident #34 said he liked the fan there because he gets hot and cold quickly, so it's easy for him to reach it and turn it on or off.An observation on 2/10/2026 at 10:05 A.M. and on 2/11/2026 at 10:40 A.M. of Resident #34's bed revealed the box fan in between his headboard and his pillow as previously observed.A review of Resident #34's admission record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and included diagnoses not limited to muscle weakness (generalized) and need for assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to update and implement an individualized person-centered care plan related to an indwelling urinary catheter device for one resident (#12) of one resident reviewed.Findings included:An observation on 2/9/2026 at 9:00 A.M. revealed Resident #12 sleeping in bed with street clothes on. The resident was observed with a urinary catheter hanging and draining at the side of the bed.A review of Resident #12's admission record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and included diagnoses not limited to obstructive and reflux uropathy, specified disorders of urethra, and benign prostatic hyperplasia.A review of Resident #12's minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #12 is cognitively intact. Section H revealed under Bladder and Bowel the resident had an indwelling catheter.A review of Resident #12's progress notes related to urinary catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for two (#84 and #151) out of three sampled residents. Findings included: On 02/09/2026 at 8:19 AM an observation of Resident #84 having long and overgrown nails. Resident #84's nails were about half an inch past the fingertips. Review of Resident #84's medical record revealed medical diagnoses of schizophrenia, other drug induced secondary parkinsonism, muscle wasting and atrophy, weakness, cognitive communications deficit, muscle weakness (generalized), and vascular dementia with unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of Resident #84's medical record revealed a Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMS) score of 00. A BIMS score of 00 indicates severe cognitive impairment. Resident #84 required partial/moderate assistance for personal hygiene. Partial/moderate assistance is described as the helper does less…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were monitored for antipsychotic medication behaviors and side effects, for two out of six residents, (#15 and #17), sampled.Findings included: 1. On 02/12/2026 at 1:53 p.m., Resident #15 was observed fully covering her head with her shirt. During an interview on 02/12/2026 at 1:45 p.m., Staff HH Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated Resident #15 had behaviors such as yelling and refusing care. Staff HH stated the resident had often requested staff to leave me alone. Staff HH stated this happened two to three times a week. During an interview on 02/12/2026 at 1:55 p.m., Staff II CNA, stated Resident #15 sometimes yelled at staff and other residents. Staff II stated Resident #15 refused to comply with being dressed and changed. During an interview on 02/12/2026 at 2:02 p.m., Staff JJ Registered Nurse (RN), stated Resident #15 sometimes has her days. Staff JJ stated the week of 02/02/2026, Resident #15 refused to get…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to prevent the right to be free from verbal abuse for one of three sampled residents (#3) related to verbal abuse during activities of daily living care. Findings included: Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the admission Record showed diagnoses included but not limited to spinal compression, functional quadriplegia, dysarthria and anarthria, spinal stenosis cervical region, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, diabetes, joint contracture, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, spondylosis with myelopathy of cervical region, pulmonary hypertension, generalized anxiety disorder, hypertension, and recurrent major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] showed Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (cognitively intact). Section GG Functional Abilities showed the resident was dependent for eating, toileting hygiene, bathing, and rolling on the bed.Review of the physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 19 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1. One of one walk in freezer unit was maintained in a manner to prevent frosting and heavy ice build up on shelving and packaged food items and 2. Failed to ensure one of one dish washing machine was operating within wash and rinse water temperature specification requirements. Findings included: 1. On 8/21/2023 at 9:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with Staff B, Dietary Manager and Staff C, Registered Dietician. Staff B said he had only been working at the facility for a couple of weeks. Staff C said she too was new to the facility and was only a Traveling Dietician. Staff B and Staff C confirmed there was a full time Dietician for the facility that was currently in the hiring process. An initial kitchen tour was conducted with Staff B and Staff C. During the tour, they said the dish machine did not normally operate until 10:00 a.m. as the facility is very large and each meal service took some time to complete. On 8/21/2023 at 10:18 a.m., a second kitchen tour was conducted with Staff B.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment for one (Resident #113) of three sampled residents. Findings included: On 08/21/2023 at 9:00 a.m., Resident #113 was observed laying in bed holding his arm, with his covers halfway on his body. Resident # 113's arm was observed with a laceration. On 08/22/2023 at 11:00 a.m., Resident #113 was observed laying in bed with his covers on top of him. Resident # 113 arm was observed with an dirty bandage on his arm, next to the open laceration. A review of the admission record showed Resident # 113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include but not limited to Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Not Elsewhere Classified, Multiple Sites, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Other Toxic Encephalopathy, Malignant Neoplasm of Peritoneum, and Uncomplicated, Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3A. A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to confirm the accuracy of a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) and to correct the document for seven (Residents #172, #205, #28, #81, #82, #110 and #130) of forty residents sampled when mental illness or suspected mental illness diagnoses were identified and added to the resident's medical diagnoses . Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #172's admission Record identified an original admission date of 8/27/21 and a recent admit date of 8/9/22. The review of Resident #172's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), dated 8/25/21, showed the diagnoses of bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, and substance abuse. The PASRR revealed the resident had had the following characteristics of difficulty of interpersonal functioning, concentration, persistence, and pace, and adaptation to change, recent treatment for mental illness, and exhibited actions or behaviors that may make them a danger to themselves or others.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion for one (Resident #3) of three sampled residents. Findings included: On 8/21/2023 at 10:12 a.m., 11:45 a.m., 12:50 p.m., and 1:55 p.m., Resident #3 was observed in her room, lying flat in bed and with her head on a pillow. One quarter bed rails on both sides of the bed were up. Resident #3 had eyes closed and with the bed linen over her and covering the lower part of her body. She was not presenting with any behaviors, pain or discomfort during all observed times. Further observations revealed both of her upper extremities (hands) were contracted. Her hands were positioned and leaning on bed rails in a manner that appeared uncomfortable. Resident #3 was not interviewable. The resident was observed not wearing any splints or braces on either of her hands. On 8/22/2023 at 7:06 a.m. and 8:20 a.m., the resident was observed in bed in a flat position with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders related to side effect monitoring for psychotropic medications for one (Resident #161) out of five sampled residents. Findings included: The admission Record showed Resident #161 was initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, and altered mental status. Section C Cognitive Patterns of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #161 was rarely/never understood. Section N Medications indicated the resident took antianxiety and antidepressants for 7 days. The Order Summary Report with active orders as of 08/24/23 revealed the following orders: side effect monitoring; Ativan oral tablet 0.5 MG- Give 1 tablet by mouth (po) at bedtime for anxiety; buspirone HCL oral tablet 10 MG- Give 1 tablet po three times a day related to generalized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-five medication administration opportunities were observed and two errors were identified for two (#87 and #106) of six residents observed. These errors constituted a 8% medication error rate. Findings included: 1. On 8/22/23 at 8:55 a.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was conducted with Resident #87. The staff member dispensed the following medications: - Acidophilus Probiotic 1 billion over-the-counter (OTC) capsule - Retrieved from medication refrigerator. - Amlodipine Besylate 2.5 milligram (mg) tablet - Baclofen 20 mg tablet - Vitamin D 25 microgram (mcg) - 2 tablets OTC - Loratadine 10 mg tablet OTC - Vitamin B-12 1000 mcg - 2 tablets OTC - Praxada 150 mg capsule - Potassium chloride Extended Release 20 milliequivalent (meq) - Furosemide 20 mg tablet - Gabapentin 100 mg - 2 capsules - Tamsulosin 0.4 mg capsule - Lubiprostone 24 mcg capsule - Metformin 500 mg tablet Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure 1. one (secured 400-hall) out of five treatment carts were locked while unattended by authorized personnel on two separate occasions, 2. a tube of medicated topical ointment prescribed for a resident was not left on the dresser in a room that the resident did not reside, and 3. one (2-High) out of eight medication carts did not contain an unopened vial of Insulin Lispro. Findings included: 1. On 8/21/23 at 9:28 a.m., an observation was conducted on the secured behavioral 400-hall of a treatment cart parked behind the nursing desk next to a dining/common area. The area did not have a latched gate or door and was accessible to residents, unauthorized personnel, and visitors. The observation revealed the first drawer of the treatment cart held 2 bottles of Thick Hand Sanitizer, a box that indicated it contained a tube of Hydrocortisone cream, multiple packages of denture cleanser, and a bottle of a reddish-brown liquid. The second…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #37) of one resident reviewed for dental services was provided with dental follow-up for missing dentures. Findings included: An interview with Resident #37 on 08/21/23 at 10:17 a.m. revealed he had broken upper and lower teeth. The resident said he had dentures and lost them. He said he thought someone was working on getting new ones, but he was not sure who was working on it. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the following: -No broken or loose fitting dentures -No cavity or broken natural teeth Review of the Nutrition Evaluation dated 6/28/23 indicated the following: -chewing problems -dysphagia A review of Resident #37's care plan showed has potential oral/dental problem dated 9/26/18. The care plan, including the interventions, had no mention of the use of dentures. A review of the dental vendor Patient Progress report dated 4/19/23 showed that Patient presents for evaluation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all residents/representatives was appropriately informed and provided consent for Pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations for four (Resident #59, #81, #82, #141) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #59's record showed a form titled Pneumococcal & Influenza Vaccination Information & Request was present in the file. The form showed the resident requested the Pneumococcal vaccination and the annual influenza. Further review of the form indicated the form was signed by a facility representative on 10/14/22. There was no signature present from the resident or responsible party. 2. Review of Resident #81's record showed a form titled Pneumococcal & Influenza Vaccination Information & Request was present in the file. The form showed the resident declined the Pneumococcal vaccination and the annual influenza. Further review of the form showed the form was signed by a facility representative on 6/19/23. There was no signature present from the resident or responsible party.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (Residents #26 and #215) of 59 residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice related to not obtaining orders for the use of a skin cream and accurately completing skin assessments for Resident #26 and not following hospital discharge orders related to a catheter and wound vac for Resident #215. Findings included: On 08/22/23 at 11:07 a.m., Resident #26 was observed in bed. A red rash was observed around her nose and on her forehead. Resident #26 stated the rash itched and staff was putting cream on it. On 08/23/23 at 9:25 a.m., Resident #26 was observed in the hallway, dressed for the day, and wearing shoes. A red rash was observed around her nose and on her forehead. Staff U, Registered Nurse (RN), was observed at the medication cart. She stated Resident #26 had dermatitis and she had a cream for it. A review of the admission Record showed Resident #26 was initially admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide enteral nutrition for one (Resident #150) out of six residents sampled for tube feeding as evidence by staff stopping the nutrition prior to the prescribed amount being infused. Findings included: On 8/21/23 at 12:50 p.m., Resident #150 was observed lying in bed with a enteral pump on an infusion pole next to the bed. The observation showed that no nutrition bottle was hanging on the pole and the pump was not running. On 8/22/23 at 11:04 a.m., Resident #150 was observed without a bottle of nutrition hanging from the infusion pole and the nutrition pump was not running. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) Review of Resident #150's admission Record revealed the resident had been admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to oropharyngeal phase dysphagia, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, and gastrostomy status. Review of Resident #150's physician orders, completed on 8/22/23 at 1:48 p.m., revealed an order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to honor resident's rights related to their choice of food preferences for five (Residents #37, #122, #160, #171, #193) of 59 sampled residents. Findings included An interview on 8/13/21 at 12:48 p.m., with Resident #160 revealed that she was on a regular diet and loved hot dogs and missed eating hot dogs. She reported that she did not know why she could not have a hot dog. She reported that the facility said that it was a safety hazard. She said, her mother brought her some hotdogs thinking that the facility would cook them but they would not, she was told that she could buy ready cooked hotdogs from outside the facility. Review of Resident #160's record revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed that she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 (Cognitively intact), did not require her food to be mechanically altered, and had no difficulty chewing. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that two (#36 and #68) out of five residents on one of the two secured units who required extensive assistance with eating were identified in a dignified manner. Findings included: On 8/10/2021 at 12:11 p.m., Staff Member G, 300-unit Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM), was observed removing trays from the meal cart on the 300-secured unit and passing them to staff members who were assisting residents with the set up of their lunch meal. The RN/UM removed one tray from the cart, while an aide waited for her to pass the tray, then placed it back on the cart while identifying that Resident #36 is a feeder. The Unit Manager was observed delivering a tray into room [ROOM NUMBER], returning with the tray and stated that Resident #68 is a feeder. Staff Member G stated, on 8/10/21 at 12:26 p.m., that both Resident #36 and Resident #68 required 1:1 assistance with eating. She confirmed that she did call Resident #36 and Resident #68…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident was afforded the right to personal privacy for one (Resident #168) of 59 sampled residents. Findings include: Observations of Resident #168's room on 8/10/21 at 11:28 a.m., revealed the resident lived in a 4 bed room and occupied the bed next to the window. It was noted that there were multiple broken and bent blinds at the window not allowing for privacy. Observations on 8/11/21 at 10:18 a.m., revealed that the window blinds next to Resident #168 bed were bent, broken, and not allowing for privacy. Observations on 8/12/21 at 9:27 a.m., revealed that Resident #168 was asleep in her bed and the window blinds on the window next to her bed were bent, broken, and not allowing for privacy Observations on 8/13/21 at 7:47 a.m., revealed Resident #168 lying in bed sleeping in her bed next to the window. The window blinds were bent, broken, and not allowing for privacy. Review of Resident #168's quarterly Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-13 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a complete written notification of a Transfer & Discharge notice to the Resident representative and the Ombudsman for one (Resident #81) of five residents sampled for discharge. Findings included: Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] according to the admission Record. On 8/11/21 at 10:11 a.m., Resident #81 was observed lying in bed. The resident was unable to speak or answer any questions related to care and was bed bound. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was unable to be conducted due to Resident #81 being rarely/never understood. A review of the progress notes, dated 6/1/21 at 11:15 a.m., revealed Resident #81 had episodes of vomiting projectile coffee ground emesis times 4. The physician was notified, and the Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP) ordered the nurse to send the resident to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-13 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to provide written notification of the facility Bed Hold Policy to the Resident representative for one (Resident #81) of five residents sampled for discharge. Findings included: A review of the facility bed hold policy (dated 6/1/21) revealed a stamp on the document stating a copy was sent with Resident #1 and a copy was mailed to the patient representative. Unable to sign was written on the document and dated by nursing on 6/1/21. A review of the policy entitled Bed hold and in-house transfer- Florida with a revised dated of February 2021, revealed the following: Policy: The facility provides the resident/resident representative notice of bed-hold in advance of transfer. An additional notice, which specifies the duration of the bed-hold, will be provided upon transfer to the hospital or prior to the therapeutic leave. The bed hold form provided at the time of discharge or therapeutic leave will be written and shall specify the duration for the bed-hold.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident assessments reflected the resident's status accurately for two (#29, #32) of 59 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Observations on 8/10/21 at 11:55 a.m., revealed that Resident #29 was noted with his lower mouth sunken in. The resident opened his mouth to show his upper dentures in place and reported that his lower dentures were in the night stand top draw and that staff assist him in putting it in daily but no one had done it today. Observations of Resident #29 on 8/11/21 at 12:15 p.m., revealed the resident with his midday meal. It was noted that he did not have in his lower dentures. Observations on 8/12/21 at 9:24 a.m., revealed Resident #29 seated in the hallway by a window looking out. He reported that he had his breakfast already but that his dentures were still in his room in the drawer. He reported that he did not get any assistance with getting his dentures put in for his meal. Review of the quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to revise the care plan for one (#153) out of fifty-nine sampled residents in related to the implementation of positioning devices while the resident was in bed. Findings included: Resident #153 was observed, on 8/11/21 at 9:25 a.m., lying in bed with the head of the bed raised and bilateral floor mats. During the observation, the mattress appeared to have bilateral bolsters on each side of the resident. On 8/12/21 at 4:10 p.m., the resident was observed lying in bed with bilateral mattress bolsters and no side rails were attached to the bed frame. On 8/12/21 at 5:28 p.m., an observation of Resident #153 was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Assistant DON (ADON). The DON confirmed that the blue wedge on the left-side of the bed was removable from the mattress and not attached to the bed frames and that the rectangular bolster on the right-side of the bed was not attached to either the mattress or bed frame. On 8/13/21 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide prompt dental service when a residents dentures do not fit appropriately for one (Resident #29) of 59 sampled residents. Findings included: Observations on 8/10/21 at 11:55 a.m., revealed that Resident #29 was noted with his lower mouth sunken in. The resident opened his mouth to show his upper dentures in place and reported that his lower dentures were in the night stand top draw and that staff assist him in putting it in daily but no one had done it today. Observations of Resident #29 on 8/11/21 at 12:15 p.m., revealed the resident with his midday meal. It was noted that he did not have in his lower dentures. Observations on 8/12/21 at 9:24 a.m., revealed Resident #29 seated in the hallway by a window looking out. He reported that he had his breakfast already but that his dentures were still in his room in the drawer. He reported that he did not get any assistance with getting his dentures put in for his meal. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SENIOR HEALTH SOUTH — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 51.9+1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.8+1.2 vs chain
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SENIOR HEALTH PROPERTIES SOUTH, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/23/2002
SENIOR HEALTH SOUTH-TAMPA LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/20/2000
JAFFE, HOWARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2014
AEGIR HEALTH MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/16/2025
CONSULTING SUPPORT SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/16/2025
FACILITY SUPPORT COMPANY, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/24/2025
KANE FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/24/2025
CROWE, JULIEANNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/17/2022
FITZPATRICK, CYNTHIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/31/2022
SELECT REHABILITATION, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/19/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$22.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$100K
Related-party expense0% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 84%Medicare 8%Other / private 7%

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $100K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$264per resident / day
operating cost
$8,025per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$273per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105299. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next