South Heritage Health & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 64.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 58.7 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.23 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for one resident (#1) out of seven sampled residents. Resident #1 sustained an unwitnessed fall on 08/21/25 and was not assessed after the fall. Resident #1 complained of hip pain on 08/23/25, an X-ray was obtained on 08/24/25 and Resident #1 was transferred to a higher level of care due to a right hip fracture on 08/24/25 and required surgical intervention.Findings included: An interview was conducted with Resident #2 on 09/02/2025 at 10:08a.m. Resident #2 was the roommate of Resident #1 and recalled the events of 08/21/2025 when Resident #1 had a fall. She stated the night of her roommate's fall; she was starting to fall asleep when she heard a loud sound and heard her roommate grunting ouch. Resident #2 said she remembered seeing her roommate in her wheelchair near the door shortly before the fall, but she was unsure as to what she was doing when the actual fall occurred. After she heard her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect by not ensuring one resident (#1) of three sampled residents, was provided transfer assistance in accordance with the resident's ability, care plan, facility policy, and/or the mechanical lifts manufacturer's recommendation, resulting in harm to Resident #1. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The electronic medical record included diagnoses not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing (created 3/1/23), and displaced transverse fracture of shaft of left femur subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing (created 3/28/25). Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to seek medical services outside the facility, resulting in delayed emergent care and services for one resident (#5) of two residents sampled.Findings included: During a follow-up telephone interview on 4/25/26 at 2:50 p.m. with Resident #5's family member, the family member revealed being upset and frustrated with the facility because they did not want to send Resident #5 out to the ER (emergency room). The family member stated the resident had requested to go to the hospital following discomfort after laparoscopic surgery. The family member stated Resident #5 had symptoms of pain, bloating and had been vomiting all night. He stated a nurse said the inhouse doctor would assess Resident #5 first. He stated she was given nausea medication and continued to have diarrhea all night through the next day. The family stated having begged the nurse to send the resident out. He stated he eventually called non-emergency police to do a wellness check and request Resident #5 to be sent out. The family…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided to one resident (#4) out of three resident reviewed for total assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs).Findings included: A review of Resident #4's admission record showed an admission date of 1/20/26. Further review of the admission record showed diagnoses to include quadriplegia, unspecified, muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, multiple sites, and other lack of coordination.On 4/25/26 at 9:19 a.m., an interview and observation occurred with Resident #4. Resident #4's nails were observed approximately one to one and a half inches long. During the interview, he stated he wanted his nails cut, and he had been asking the assigned certified nursing assistant (CNA) for the last three days. Resident #4 said the assigned CNA would tell him, No, not yet I'm on break. He said one of the days the assigned CNA assisted with soaking his nails for 30 minutes. Resident #4 said when she came back, she said he had to wait for them to be trimmed because it was the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure diet-related physician orders were implemented for one resident (#4) out of three resident reviewed. Findings included: On 4/25/26 at 12:30 p.m., an observation of Resident #4's lunch meal revealed the meal ticket did not show large or double portions was documented. A review of Resident #4's admission record showed an admission date of 1/20/26. Further review of the admission record showed diagnoses to include quadriplegia, unspecified, muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, multiple sites, and other lack of coordination. A review of Resident #4's physician orders revealed the following: House diet Regular texture, Regular(Thin) consistency, No pork, lactose intolerant, no dairy (milk or cheese), with a start date of 1/26/26. Resident may have double portions for all meals six times a day, with a start date of 3/7/26. A review of Resident #4's care plan revealed the following: NUTRITIONAL: [Resident #4] has a potential nutritional problem r/t [related to] Diagnoses - Quadriplegia,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-two medication administration opportunities were observed, and fifteen errors were identified for two residents (#3 and #2) of two residents observed. These errors constituted a 68.18% medication error rate. Failure to ensure the accurate administration of medications has the potential to greatly affect the effectiveness of the medication and jeopardize the health and safety of the resident. Findings included:1.On 10/15/25 at 10:06 a.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was conducted with Resident #3. The resident's medication profile was colored red, showing medications were late. The staff member removed an insulin pen and insulin syringe lying both on top of the medication cart then dispensed the following medications:- saccharomyces boulardii over-the-counter (otc) 500 milligram (mg) tablet- haloperidol 2 mg…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to implement an effective infection control program related to ensuring one of one observed needle attached to an insulin syringe was appropriately sheathed, staff failed to provide a barrier between an insulin syringe and an over bed table, failed to clean hands in between residents and handling random resident equipment stored in hallway, failed to don gloves prior to the administration of eye drops for one (#2) of one resident receiving this type of medication, and failed to ensure two (B & C) of three direct care nurses fingernails had the ability to be cleaned thoroughly and adequately to prevent the transmission of microbes. Failure to not implement and educate staff regarding infection control measures could cause serious harm to residents by not ensuring cross contamination between environmental and residents. Findings included:On 10/15/25 at 10:06 a.m. Staff A was observed during Resident #3's administration of medications. The observation showed Staff B extract 24 units from an insulin degludec…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and review of the facility policy, the facility did not ensure a sanitary and home-like environment was provided in the main shower room and in two shared bathrooms (100/102 and 129/131) out of thirteen rooms with shared bathrooms.Findings included: On 10/15/25 at 9:43 a.m., an observation of the main shower room revealed clumps of hair and debris in the drain. Further observations of the main shower revealed a white shower chair, by the door, which had a clear cup with a green colored substance and multiple black particles on the left leg and arm handle. On 10/15/25 at 9:45 a.m., an observation of the shower area in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 102 revealed a bedpan on the shower chair with black debris and particles inside. Further observation of the floor revealed multiple strands of dark colored hair as well as multiple areas of black bio-growth. On 10/15/25 at 10:08 a.m., an observation of the shower area in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 131 revealed multiple areas of green and black…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was providing services for eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, for the period of 4/6/25 to 4/12/25. Findings included: A review of the staff schedule dated 4/5/25 - 4/6/25 revealed the nursing staff on each shift (10:45 p.m. - 7:15 a.m., 6:45 a.m. - 3:15 p.m., and 2:45 p.m. - 11:15 p.m.) were all Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) and RN was indicated next to a staff name that was crossed out. On 4/24/25 at 3:34 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). She said the facility completed their staffing based on census to determine how many Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and nurses they need per day. She said between calling and requesting off, they haven't had enough staff on certain days and she finds out afterwards when staff do not come in, After the fact. She confirmed the facility is supposed to have an RN on duty and, Maybe the RN called off that day. She said she doesn't know because she was out of town. The DON said when she was out of town, a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to provide nursing staff with the competencies and skills to provide appropriate nursing services to one resident (#1) of three sampled residents related to 1.) not providing a safe mechanical lift transfer which resulted in a severe bodily injury, 2.) not accurately documenting the administrations of controlled medications, and 3.) failed to notify the emergency contact of the resident requiring a transfer to an acute care facility following a fall. Findings included: 1. Review of the facility's reportable log showed an event involving Resident #1 occurred on 3/23/25. The event resulted in Fracture/Dislocation/transfer outside. Review of the Situation, Background, Appearance, and Review and Notify, dated 3/23/25, revealed Resident #1 had a fall with worsening of chronic pain in the front left thigh and front left knee and rated the intensity of pain 7 of 10. The summary of staff observation and evaluation revealed the resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure the designated representative/emergency contact was notified regarding a change in condition, related to an accident resulting in hospitalization, for one resident (#1) of three residents sampled. Findings included: A review of Resident #1's admission Record revealed an original admission date of 3/1/23 and a re-admission date of 3/28/25. Review of the admission Record revealed diagnoses to include displaced transverse fracture of shaft of left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, other lack of coordination, weakness, unsteadiness on feet, need for assistance with personal care, contracture, left knee, unspecified fracture of left lower leg, and subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing. A review of Resident #1's admission Record revealed her family member (EC) is the emergency contact/recipient for verbal patient health information (PHI). A review of Resident #1's skilled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an accurate accounting of narcotic medication for one resident (#1) of one resident sampled for the administration of pain medication. Findings included: On 4/23/25 at 10:40 a.m. Resident #1 was observed sitting in the Dining Room with a family member. The resident reported her legs and hands were hurting while rubbing the top of left leg and the oxy was not working. The resident reported a recent surgery to the left leg due to a staff member pivoting her to transfer. Review of Resident #1s quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated1/8/25, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15 of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The assessment revealed Resident #1 was dependent upon staff for sit to lying, lying to sit, and bed to chair transferring. The assessment showed the resident received scheduled and as needed pain medication for occasional pain. Review of Resident #1s April Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the following orders: - Ordered 3/28/25:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$145,109 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $54,704 — penalty dated 2025-09-02
• $90,405 — penalty dated 2025-04-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SENIOR HEALTH SOUTH — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $287K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL