Winter Haven Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 134.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 3% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure care for gastrostomy tubes was provided in accordance with professional standards for one (#2) of three residents sampled for gastrostomy tubes. Findings included: A review of Resident #2's medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of intestinal obstruction. Resident #2 was discharged from the facility on 8/24/2024. A review of Resident #2's physician orders revealed the following orders: - An order dated 8/11/2024 indicating Resident #2's gastrostomy tube (GT) site may be left open to air if clean and no drainage and to monitor for skin integrity and changes every shift. - An order dated 8/14/2024 to evaluate for displacement of the GT every shift by observing for abdominal distension, nausea, vomiting, and pain. If displacement is suspected, clamp GT and call the physician. A review of Resident #2's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for August 2024 revealed the following: - Monitoring of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a clean, sanitary, and homelike environment for residents on one unit (#300) out of three units in the facility. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 1/21/24 at 10:19 a.m. of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The observation revealed a three-drawer dresser inside the bathroom with a missing drawer and on the floor next to the dresser was 2 gray water basins sitting on the floor. The over-bed table of the room was rusty and uncleanable. The vinyl baseboard near the closet was missing and the wallboard was broken. The wall near the entrance door was broken behind the baseboard. An observation on 1/21/24 at 10:45 a.m., was made of room [ROOM NUMBER]. An open area of approximately 3/4 inch was noted on the side of the wall air conditioning unit. The area was open to the outside and could be seen while standing in the resident room. The closet door track was rusty and unclean. An over-the-bed table located in the room was rusty and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-24 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for four residents (#51, #236, #72, #115) out of six sampled residents, were revised for accuracy related to diagnoses. Findings included: 1) A review of Resident #51's admission Record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. The record showed diagnoses of unspecified Alzheimer's disease with an onset date of 8/3/21, unspecified dementia unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance, mild single episode major depressive disorder, delusional disorders, and other insomnia. Review on 1/22/24 at 9:51 a.m., of Resident #51's admission Record showed Alzheimer's disease was the primary diagnosis. Review of Resident #51's PASRR, dated 3/16/23, showed the resident had a mental illness (MI) of depressive disorder and did not reveal the resident's delusional disorder. The PASRR did not reveal the resident had a primary diagnosis of dementia or related…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-24 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II assessment for a qualifying mental health diagnosis for two residents (#6 and #97) of six residents sampled. Findings included: Review of the admission Record showed Resident #6 was admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, mood disorder, and other comorbidities. Review of Resident #6's PASRR Level I Assessment, dated 02/24/2023, showed a qualifying mental health diagnosis marked in section I A. for anxiety. Section II, (7) is marked yes for having validating documentation to support the dementia . and documentation should accompany the Level I PASRR screen . There is no evidence a Level II evaluation was submitted. During an interview on 01/22/2024 at 04:11 PM, the Social Service Director (SSD) confirmed responsibility for the completion and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide treatments and care in accordance with professional standards of practice as evidence by 1) failure to assess and treat a wound for one resident (#51) out of two sampled for skin conditions, 2) failure to document and treat a change in condition according to facility policy for one resident (#82) out of two residents sampled for change in condition, and 3) failure to maintain a midline intravenous catheter as ordered for one resident (#41) out of one sampled for intravenous access. Findings included: 1) On 1/21/24 at approximately 10:18 a.m., Resident #51 was observed sitting across from the nursing station of the secured unit with other residents. The observation showed a brown adhesive dressing on the left toe. The dressing appeared to be undated. On 1/21/24 at 10:22 a.m., Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM) placed blue non-slip socks on Resident #51. The staff member reported not knowing why the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hydration was provided to residents residing on the secured unit in a sanitary manner during two lunch meals (1/21/24 and 1/22/24) out of two lunch meal observed. Findings included: On 1/21/24 at 12:43 p.m. a meal cart was delivered to the 300-hall. On 1/21/24 at 12:48 p.m., Staff K, CNA, removed a tray of pre-filled uncovered cups of three different colored liquids from the second shelf of a three shelf cart and placed the tray onto the top of the meal cart. The staff member stated the cups were pre-filled on the unit. On 1/21/24 at 12:55 p.m. an observation was made of the meal cart on 300-hall moving from between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] to outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] with the same above mentioned pre-filled uncovered cups on top. Staff were observed removing trays from the cart then placing the pre-filled cups on the tray before delivering to resident rooms. (Photographic evidence was obtained). On 1/22/24 at 12:35 p.m. an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide one resident (#109) with dignity and respect related to bowel and bladder needs out of one resident sampled for dignity. Findings included: On 01/22/24 at 9:30 a.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #109. The resident stated he had been in the facility for about two months for rehabilitation after suffering a fractured hip. He stated he had limited weight bearing abilities. He stated he used a urinal due to his limited abilities. Two urinals were observed at the bedside. Resident #109 appeared embarrassed to admit he has to have assistance with toileting. On 01/23/2024 at 9:29 a.m. Resident #109 was observed lying in bed. The resident stated he was waiting for a care giver to provide assistance following a bowel movement. Resident #109 stated his brief was dirty because he cannot use the bed pan. He stated the bed pans are too small for him to use and he was embarrassed when staff have to clean his bottom after having a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to review and revise the resident centered care plan related to behaviors for one resident (#82) of five residents sampled for comprehensive care plans. Findings included: A review of Resident #82's admission Record showed the resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. The record showed diagnoses not limited to not elsewhere classified anoxic brain damage, unspecified intractable epilepsy with status epilepticus, and adult failure to thrive. A review of Resident #82's medical record showed a completed Hospital Transfer Form dated 1/19/24. The form showed the reason for transfer was the Replacement of G-tube. The form revealed the resident was sent to an acute care hospital on 1/19/24. On 1/23/24 at 1:49 p.m. Resident #82 was observed lying in bed, bilateral legs were contracted at bilateral knees, hands held near the head region, and the resident remained nonverbal but followed this writer and Staff C, Registered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) for one resident (#18) out of four residents sampled for ADL care related to personal hygiene and bathing. Findings included: 1) An observation on 01/21/24 at 11:05 AM revealed Resident #18 lying in his bed. The resident was able to verbalize his name and introduce himself. Closer observation of the resident revealed the resident was noted with stubbly white facial hair and long fingernails. The resident was asked if he preferred facial hair and he stated, No, I need a shave, you gonna shave me? An observation of Resident #18 on 01/22/24 at 10:07 AM revealed the resident resting in bed. The resident was noted with his face still unshaven with gray stubbly hair covering his face and chin. The resident's fingernails were noted to still be elongated on his bilateral hands. The resident reported he was still waiting to be shaved and does not like the hair on his face and would like for his nails to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide care and services according to physician's orders related to catheter care for one resident (Resident #36) out of the two sampled residents. Findings included: On 01/21/24 at 10:10 a.m., the resident was observed in bed in his room. There was a foul urine smell in the room. Resident #36 was verbal but was not able to answer questions appropriately during an attempt to interview him. A review of the admission Record for Resident #36 showed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of personal history of urinary tract infection and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Section C: Cognitive Patterns of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Section H: Bladder and Bowel showed the resident had an indwelling catheter. The Order Summary Report with active orders as of 11/01/23 revealed the following:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$4,190 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $4,190 — penalty dated 2024-01-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SENIOR HEALTH SOUTH — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $174K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL