Alpine Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 50.8 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-05-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate skin evaluations were completed in a timely manner for one resident (#1) out of three residents reviewed. Resident #1 was diagnosed with a Stage IV pressure ulcer to the sacrum and osteomyelitis and sent to a higher level of care for treatment. Findings included: A record review of Resident #1's SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) Communication Form dated 3/11/2026 at 7:29 a.m., showed a new pressure ulcer with the primary physician and family notified. A record review of Resident #1's admission Record showed an original admit date of 6/06/2013 with the following diagnoses: Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications (DMII), Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage affecting right non-dominant side, and other comorbidities. Resident #1 was discharged on 4/20/2026 to the hospital due to the pressure ulcer and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-08 · tag F0645 — widespread
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not complete and/or update the level I pre-admission screening and resident reviews (PASSARs) for residents with qualifying medical diagnoses for six (#4, #5, #9, #13, #18 and #36) out of 18 residents reviewed for PASSARsFindings Included: 1. A review of Resident #9's admission record revealed an original admission date of 11/4/24, and a re-admission date of 11/2/25, with diagnoses to include but not limited to; other recurrent depressive disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, chronic, anxiety disorder unspecified, and alcohol abuse with intoxication, unspecified. A review of Resident #9's annual minimum data set (MDS) for medications, dated 11/7/25, revealed the following under high-risk drug classes: antidepressant usage. A review of Resident #9's care plan revealed the following focus areas to include: - Trauma Informed Care-PTSD [post-traumatic stress disorder] and major depression. - PSYCHOTROPIC MED [medication]: The resident uses psychotropic medication r/t [related to] Antianxiety to manage: anxiety Antidepressant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program by failing to 1.) ensure hand hygiene was offered for eight ( 20A, 21B ,22B, 23A,24A 24B, 25A, 26A, 26B, 28B) of the eight rooms observed prior to meals. (2) The facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while handling laundry for the facility in one of one laundry rooms. 3.) The facility failed to follow infection control practices related to respiratory equipment for one (#2) of two residents samples with oxygen. Findings Included: On 01/05/2026 at 10:40 a.m., observed Resident #2 sitting up in bed with the tray table in front of them. The resident was fully dressed and observed using oxygen with a nasal cannula in place. The resident stated they used oxygen during the day. Resident #2 said the staff have not changed the nasal cannula. Observed the nasal cannula tubing was labeled 11/10. Review of Resident #2's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident council meetings were documented as required for six of six months of resident council minutes requested. The facility could not demonstrate that they acted upon grievances voiced during resident council meetings.Findings Included: A review of the grievance log from June 2025 to December 2025 did not reveal any entries from Resident Council. During the Resident Council (RC) meeting on 1/7/2026 at 1:26 p.m. The RC members said they are not sure who the Grievance Official. The Grievance Official changes frequently, and they are not informed when the changes occur. The RC members said the staff never discuss the rationale behind unresolved issues, but We [the facility] will look into it is the answer received without resolution. On 1/7/26 at 5:12 p.m., an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was conducted. The NHA said the activities director had no documentation of the resident council minutes. The NHA said the expectation is the activities director should document what occurred in the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment related to rusted equipment, unpainted, damaged and uncleanable surfaces in the laundry room and 13 (2,6,10,11,14,16,19,20,21,23,26,28 and 29) of 28 resident rooms toured and one of one laundry room toured Findings included: 1. On 1/5/26 at 10:30 a.m., an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the dresser drawers, to the left of the bed closest to the window, were coming off the tracks and slanted. The wall closest to the door had a linear groove, the length of the resident's bed, where paint was peeling and scraped off. Observations of the bathroom shared by room [ROOM NUMBER] and 17 had towels wrapped around the toilet which were brown-stained. The plunger on the floor next to the toilet had no bag over it. On 1/5/26 at 11:13 a.m., an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the top drawer of the dresser was missing. Observations of the bathroom shared by room [ROOM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement its grievance process. The facility did not ensure resident's grievances from Resident Council were received, investigated, and a resolution provided or discussed for six of six months of resident council meeting minutes reviewed. Findings Included: Resident #9 said the residents are not sure who the Grievance Official is currently. The Grievance Official changes, and they must look at the paper on one of the office doors to find out the current person. The staff never discuss the rationale behind unresolved issues. We will look into it is the answer the residents receive all the time without any resolution. On 1/7/26 at 5:12 p.m., an interview with the NHA was conducted. She said the activities director had no documentation of the resident council minutes. She said the expectation is the activities director should document what occurred in the resident council meetings on the minutes. She then said the activities director has some notes and would provide copies of what documentation was completed. On 1/08/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure the appropriate staff member referred one (#7) with serious mental disorder(s)/diagnoses to the State's Mental Health authority for Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) out of 18 residents sampled. A record review of Resident #7's admission Record showed an original admit date of 11/27/2025 with diagnoses to include but not limited to:Epilepsy, unspecified, not intractable , without status epilepticusAnxiety disorder, unspecifiedLatent syphilis, unspecified as early or lateBipolar disorder, current episode mixed, severe, with psychotic featuresMajor depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecifiedAlcohol abuse with intoxication, unspecifiedA record review of Resident #7's PASSR dated 01/27/2025 showed in Section A. MI or suspected MI (mental illness) (check all that apply) showed Substance Abuse as the only MI. On 01/08/2026 at 1:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated the facility currently does not have a designated individual to screen,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility did not 1. Ensure a care plan was initiated for one (#4) of two residents reviewed for mental health diagnoses; and 2. did not ensure care plans were initiated and/or implemented for two (#34 and #23) of three residents reviewed for smoking.Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #4's admission record revealed an admission date of 04/04/2025, with diagnosis to include but not limited to, major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified. A review of Resident #4's annual minimum data set (MDS),for medications, dated 12/22/2025, revealed the following under high- risk drug classes: antidepressants usage. A review of Resident #4's physician's orders dated January 2026 revealed the following to include: -Setraline Hydrochloride (HCS) Oral Tablet 50 milligrams (mg), give 50 mg by mouth in the afternoon for depression. A review of Resident #4's care plan revealed no documentation of interventions or focus area related to major depression diagnosis.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living, specifically nail care was provided for three (#5, 21, and 43) of six residents reviewed who required assistance with personal hygiene. Findings included: On 01/05/2026 at 9:30 a.m., observed Resident #21 sitting up in bed. Observed the resident had soiled, long fingernails. Observed scratches on their right upper arm. Resident #21 stated the wounds on their legs are due to lymphedema. The bandage on the right leg had a date of 01/02. On 1/7/2026 at 11:40 a.m., observed Resident #21 sitting in his bed. Resident #21 stated the facility does not cut his nails but wished the facility would. Observed several of the long nails had broken and were hanging on the nail bed. Review of admission Records showed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but are not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle wasting and atrophy, and type 2 diabetes mellitus without…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure weekly skin sweep evaluation were done for three (13, 36, and 5) out of three residents.Findings included: A record review of weekly skin sweeps for Residents #5, 13 & and 36 showed the following: Resident #5 had weekly skin sweeps on 12/06/2025, 12/18/2025 and 01/07/2026 with 12/18/2025 showed a skin impairment under right eye for discoloration.Resident #13 had weekly skin sweeps on 12/06/2025 and no further skin sweeps documented.Resident #36 had weekly skin sweeps on 12/06/2025 and no further skin sweeps documented. During an interview on 01/05/2026 at 9:20 a.m., Resident #13 stated her bottom is sore. Resident #13 said sitting in her wheelchair for an extended time as well feels her bottom hits the springs of the bed under the mattress. On 01/08/2026 at 9:33 a.m., an observation occurred with Staff D, Registered Nurse/Unit Manager (RN/UM) and Staff M, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) for skin sweep assessments for Residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility did not ensure residents were free from accident hazards for two (#34 and #23) of three residents reviewed for smoking as evidenced by residents not being evaluated, care plan interventions were not developed and implemented, and the smoking procedure/policy was not followed.Findings included: 1.On 1/7/26 at 11:27 a.m., an observation of Resident #34 revealed he was self-propelling in the wheelchair from the hall to the smoking area for the resident's designated smoking time. Further observations of the designated smoke time revealed Resident #34 took a cigarette that was on his lap and Staff E, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) proceeded to light his cigarette. Staff E, CNA was not observed providing him a cigarette from the facility's designated box where residents smoking materials are kept. An observation of Resident #34 revealed the bottom of a white and green cigarette box was seen coming out underneath his shirt. A review of Resident #34's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SENIOR HEALTH SOUTH — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $246K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL