Advinia Care At Venice

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 227 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 40.5 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-07-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, review of facility's policies and procedures, and staff interview the facility failed to protect residents' rights to be free from neglect. The facility neglected to develop a care plan and ensure adequate supervision to prevent unsafe wandering and elopement for 1 (Resident #386) of 5 sampled cognitively impaired residents with active exit seeking behaviors. On 4/1/23 at approximately 4:30 p.m., Resident #386 who was cognitively impaired, and wheelchair bound was not adequately supervised. The resident wheeled herself through an unsecured door of the skilled nursing facility into a hallway leading to the adjoining Assisted Living Facility. Resident #386 left through the front door of the Assisted Living Facility, and traveled unsupervised in her wheelchair, approximately three tenths of a mile, and crossed two streets. On 4/1/23 at 5:45 p.m., a staff member from a neighboring skilled nursing facility found Resident #386 wandering the streets. Resident #386 had a likelihood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-07-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement processes to ensure adequate supervision of 1 (Resident #386) of 5 cognitively impaired residents at risk for elopement to prevent unsafe wandering and elopement. On 4/1/23 at approximately 4:30 p.m., Resident #386 who was a vulnerable cognitively impaired, wheelchair bound resident with known wandering behavior was not adequately supervised. The resident wheeled herself through an unsecured door of the skilled nursing facility into a hallway leading to the adjoining Assisted Living Facility. Resident #386 wore a wander alarm and triggered the alarm of two doors without staff response. Resident #386 left through the front door of the Assisted Living Facility, and traveled in her wheelchair, approximately three tenths of a mile, and crossed two streets. Resident #386 was missing for approximately one hour and 30 minutes without staff knowledge. On 4/1/23 at 5:45 p.m., a staff member from a neighboring skilled nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-07-16 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility's administration failed to utilize its resources effectively to ensure a safe environment, including adequate supervision of cognitively impaired residents with known exit seeking behaviors to prevent unsafe wandering and elopement. On 4/1/23 at approximately 4:30 p.m., Resident #386 who was cognitively impaired, and wheelchair bound was not adequately supervised. The resident wheeled herself through an unsecured door of the skilled nursing facility into a hallway leading to the adjoining Assisted Living Facility. Resident #386 left through the front door of the Assisted Living Facility, and traveled unsupervised in her wheelchair, approximately three tenths of a mile, and crossed two streets. On 4/1/23 at 5:45 p.m., a staff member from a neighboring skilled nursing facility found Resident #386 wandering the streets. Resident #386 had a likelihood for serious harm, injury, or death due to the risk for serious injury from a fall, getting lost or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-07-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's policies and procedures, and staff interviews the facility failed to develop and implement appropriate corrective actions related to adequate supervision of cognitively impaired residents at risk for unsafe wandering, elopement and exit seeking behaviors. On 4/1/23 at approximately 4:30 p.m., Resident #386 who was vulnerable, cognitively impaired, and wheelchair bound was not adequately supervised. The resident wheeled herself through an unsecured door of the skilled nursing facility into a hallway leading to the adjoining Assisted Living Facility. Resident #386 left through the front door of the Assisted Living Facility, setting off a wander alarm, and traveled unsupervised in her wheelchair, approximately three tenths of a mile, and crossed two streets. On 4/1/23 at 6:00 p.m., a staff member from a neighboring skilled nursing facility found Resident #386 wandering the streets. Resident #386 had a likelihood for serious harm, injury, or death due to the risk for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-08 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
  Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy and procedure, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide nursing care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 residents reviewed for ostomy (part of the intestine surgically brought outside the abdominal wall to collect stool into a pouch) .The findings included:The findings include: Review of the facility Ostomy Care (Colostomy [surgical opening bringing the a section of the large intestine to the surface], Jejunostomy [a surgical opening into the mid-section of the small intestine through the abdominal wall], Ileostomy [a surgical opening connecting the small intestine through a new opening through the abdominal wall]) policy (last revised 1/2023) states it is the policy of this facility to provide ostomy care to residents in a manner that promotes dignity and resident health by maintaining cleanliness and skin integrity, preventing odors and preventing infections . apply appliance per manufacturers…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure and staff interviews, the facility failed to prepare, and store food in a sanitary manner by failing to cover and date food in 1 reach-in refrigerator, failed to use proper hand hygiene during dish washing procedure, and failed to ensure hair restraints were used to cover facial hair. Additionally, the facility failed to properly assist residents during meals to prevent cross contamination. The lack of sanitation in the kitchen and dining services had the potential to affect all residents and staff. The findings included: The facility policy Food Safety and Sanitation initiated 2021 documented Beard nets are required when facial hair is visible are we cried when facial hair is visible. Employees will wash their hands just before they start to work in the kitchen and after smoking, sneezing, using the restroom, handling poisonous compounds or dirty dishes, and touching their face, hair, other people or surfaces or items with potential for contamination. All time and temperature control for safety foods including leftovers…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure, review of the clinical record and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene for 2 (Residents # 11 and #16) of 2 residents reviewed for ADLs (activities of daily living). The findings included: 1. The facility policy CA-12 ADL Support initiated 7/2019 (revised 10/2022) documented Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care). Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #11 had a readmission date of 6/13/24 with diagnoses including falls, acute respiratory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff and family interview the facility failed to document a thorough investigation including root cause analysis to prevent future falls for 1 (Resident #16) of 2 residents reviewed for falls. The facility also failed to coordinate care and implement interventions to minimize the risk of avoidable fall and fall related injuries for Resident #16 with a history of multiple falls. The findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Falls Management Program, dated 2/7/21 indicates that the fall response steps are a comprehensive approach that forms the backbone of the falls Management Program (FMP). It includes the following eight steps: 1. Evaluate and monitor resident for 72 hours after the fall. 2. Investigate fall circumstances. 3. Record circumstances, resident outcome, and staff response. 4. Fax alert to primary care provider. 5. Implement immediate intervention within the first 24 hours. 6. Complete falls assessment. 7. Develop plan of care. 8. Monitor staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and family interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise and update the plan of care for 1 (Resident #16) of 2 residents reviewed for fall. Reviewing and updating of a resident's plan of care by the interdisciplinary team ensured the residents reached and maintained the highest practical safety measures and wellbeing. The findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Falls Management Program, dated 2/7/21 indicates that the fall response steps are a comprehensive approach that forms the backbone of the falls Management Program (FMP). It includes the following eight steps: 1. Evaluate and monitor resident for 72 hours after the fall. 2. Investigate fall circumstances. 3. Record circumstances, resident outcome, and staff response. 4. Fax alert to primary care provider. 5. Implement immediate intervention within the first 24 hours. 6. Complete falls assessment. 7. Develop plan of care. 8. Monitor staff compliance and resident response. During an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure, record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure they provided an ongoing program to support the residents in their choice of activities which are designed to meet the resident's interests and support the resident physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for 2 (residents #11, and #190) of 3 residents reviewed for involvement in activities. The lack of an ongoing activity program could lead to a decline in the residents' self-esteem, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings included: The facility policy Activities effective 7/1/18 (revised 2/3/21) documented Activities refer to any endeavor, other than routine ADL's in which a resident participates that is intended to enhance her/his sense of well-being and to promote self-esteem, pleasure, comfort, education, creativity, success and independence. The facility shall provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to coordinate care and services for 1 (Resident #13) of 1 sampled resident's receiving dialysis by failing to ensure medications related to dialysis were administered as ordered by the physician. The findings included: Review of a facility policy titled; Dialysis Management dated 10/2022 indicates that the nurse will obtain orders for Medication as ordered to dialysis schedule. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #13 on 2/19/24 with the following diagnosis: End stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated that the Resident #13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, cognitively intact. MDS also indicated that the resident was currently receiving dialysis for end stage renal failure. Review of Resident #13's Care Plan initiated 2/28/24 indicated Resident #13 needed dialysis related to end stage renal disease and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to prevent a decline in urinary continence for 1 Resident (#21) of 2 incontinent residents reviewed. The findings included: Review of the facility policy for bladder and bowel evaluation revised 1/2023: Residents are evaluated for continence on admission/readmission, quarterly, and with significant change in status. Residents who have been determined to be incontinent without a documented irreversible cause, presenting with a significant change in continence, will be further evaluated for potential bowel or bladder management. On admission, residents without a documented reversible cause for bowel or bladder incontinence will be assessed for the potential of bladder/bowel retraining program. Quarterly those residents with a significant change decline in bowel or bladder continence, that is not transient and self-limiting, will have a bowel and bladder evaluation completed, and will have bowel and bladder diary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have a process in place to minimize loss or diversion of controlled narcotic medications. The findings included: Review of the facility policy for Controlled Substances: Documentation/Destruction/Storage revised 6/5/21: Once removed from count, discontinued drugs are stored in a double-locked area which is secure and accessible to the director of nursing and administrator only. On 7/1/24 at 12:36 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff F said she gives the unused controlled substances from the medication cart to the Director of Nursing (DON) for destruction. She said the DON locks them in her drawer. On 7/11/24 at 12:36 p.m., observed the DON open her desk drawer with her key to reveal multiple narcotic drug packs and controlled substance record sheet. On 7/11/24 at 12:36 p.m., the DON was interviewed in her office. She said the unused controlled substances are stored in her desk in the left-hand side drawer. She said does not know which narcotics are in her drawer and does not have a list for which she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-07-16 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager possessed the necessary qualifications and to ensure frequently scheduled consultation by a qualified dietitian. The findings included: On 7/11/23 at 11:45 a.m., the Director of Food and Nutrition Services said she had completed a course work on June 28, 2019, at a university for Nutrition and Food service Professional training. She said the completed course allowed her to take the certification exam but has not done so yet. She stated the Registered Dietician (RD) worked offsite but came in once a month. The Director of Food and Nutrition Services provided a certificate of completion dated June 28, 2019 which noted she had, Satisfactorily completed the requirement for the Professional Development pre-certification course. Nutrition and foodservice [sic] Professional Training. On 7/12/23 at 4:13 p.m., the regional RD said he visits the facility monthly to monitor the food and nutrition services. He said the facility RD normally does the clinical part of the assessments, including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ADVINIACARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $706K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL