AdviniaCare Oakland Grove LLC
560 Cumberland Hill Road, Woonsocket, RI 02895 · For profit - Corporation · 178 certified beds · (401) 769-0800 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent Aug 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $111,098 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-25)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.8% | 19.6% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.8% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.7% | 2.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 13.5% | 17.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.6% | 3.6% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.4% | 16.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.4% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.1% | 95.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.8% | 4.2% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.7% | 22.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.2% | 22.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 2.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 78.8% | 78.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.0% | 24.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 23.3% | 14.6% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
63.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 42.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 63.0%CMS range 45.9–75.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.4%CMS range 5.6–13.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 42.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 32.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.71 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 178 beds and averages 154.2 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2026-06-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespreadEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, surveyor observations, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide an environment that remained as free of accident hazards as possible and failed to implement adequate supervision and interventions to prevent avoidable harm. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure safe water temperatures in resident-accessible hand sinks throughout all four resident care floors, exposing residents to the potential for serious burn injuries. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that Resident ID #2 received timely and appropriate post-fall assessment, monitoring, and interventions in accordance with facility policy following a fall, placing the resident at risk for undetected injury and potential worsening of condition. Findings are as follows:1. According to TITLE 216 - DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, CHAPTER 40 - PROFESSIONAL LICENSING AND FACILITY REGULATION, SUBCHAPTER 10 - FACILITIES REGULATION, PART 1 - Licensing of Nursing Facilities, .In resident areas, hot water temperatures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who was administered antipsychotic medication (Clozaril) which was intended for another resident (Resident ID #2), Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 10/5/2024 indicated that Resident ID #1 was transferred to an acute care hospital due a change in his/her mental status related to a potential medication error. Review of the manufacturer's guidance, last revised September 2024, revealed that Clozaril (clozapine) is an antipsychotic medication used to treat severe psychotic disorders. The starting dose is 12.5 milligrams (mg) and the peak (when the medication reaches the highest concentration in a person's blood) time can occur between 1 - 6 hours after administration. Warnings, precautions, and adverse reactions include,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-06-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, surveyor observation, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to immediately consult with the physician when a resident's condition significantly changed or when treatment required alteration for 2 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1 and #5. The facility failed to notify the practitioner of Resident ID #1's worsening respiratory status, fever, lethargy, and labored breathing while receiving hospice services, and failed to obtain a physician order or notify the practitioner regarding Resident ID #5's urinary retention requiring catheterization. These failures had the potential to delay medical evaluation and treatment and resulted in actual harm for Resident ID #5, who required hospitalization for urinary retention. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Physician Services dated 10/2022 states in part, It is the policy of the facility to ensure the medical supervision of a resident's care during their stay, orders for immediate care and needs are met by a physician. 1. Review of a facility policy titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with the resident's physician-approved hospice plan of care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed receiving hospice services, Resident ID #1. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure timely administration of physician-ordered Morphine Sulfate for the management of pain and shortness of breath despite repeated hospice recommendations, worsening clinical symptoms, and the medication being available within the facility. As a result, Resident ID #1 experienced prolonged unmanaged pain and respiratory distress, including worsening lethargy, labored breathing, tachypnea (rapid shallow breathing), tachycardia (rapid heart rate), and fever. Findings are as follows:Review of a facility policy titled, Hospice Services states in part, .When a resident participates in the hospice program, a coordinated plan of care between the facility, hospice agency and the resident/family will be developed and shall include directives for managing pain and other uncomfortable symptoms.Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to adhere to its established bowel management protocol by not initiating timely interventions after 9 consecutive shifts without a bowel movement, failing to notify the provider of medication refusal and a new diagnosis of constipation, and neglecting to reassess and update the care plan. These failures resulted in prolonged fecal impaction, hospitalization, and contributed to the Resident's clinical deterioration and death. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 3 residents reviewed for bowel management, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows:Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 12/8/2025, alleged that while Resident ID #1 was at the facility, the facility failed to address the resident's constipation. It further alleged that the resident was hospitalized related to this failure.Review of a facility policy titled, BOWEL EVACUATION PROTOCOL, dated March…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to keep a resident free from physical abuse, for 1 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 7/22/2025 revealed in part, Resident ID #2 (the perpetrator) was observed walking over to Resident ID #1 (the victim), in the dining room, and grabbed his/her left wrist, twisted it back and pulled his/her hair. Further review revealed Resident ID #2 was transferred to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation and a STAT (immediate) X-ray was ordered for Resident ID #1.Review of a facility policy titled, RESIDENT ABUSE, NEGLECT, MISTREATMENT AND MISSAPROPRIATION PREVENTION, dated April 2015 states in part, .Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment.'Abuse' means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to keep a resident free from sexual abuse for 1 of 5 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition Policy dated September 2020, states in part, .It will be the facility's responsibility to identify, correct and intervene in situations where abuse, mistreatment, neglect, exploitation and/or misappropriation of resident property occur .sexual abuse includes, but is not limited to, sexual harassment, sexual coercion or sexual assault. Sexual abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident . Review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 9/30/2024 revealed that Resident ID #s 1 and 2 reported to a supervisor on 9/26/2024 that they were engaging in a consensual sexual relationship. On the morning of 9/30/2024, Resident ID #1 reported to the Director of Social Services that s/he had sex with Resident ID #2 three times since 9/27/2024 and all of these instances were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-10-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that allegations made by residents are recognized as possible abuse by staff, all allegations are investigated, and that residents are kept free from experiencing further abuse during investigations for 1 of 1 Resident reviewed who expressed concerns to staff members regarding a consensual sexual relationship with another resident, Resident ID #1 (the alleged victim). Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition Policy dated September 2020, states in part, .each resident has the right to be free from abuse .Procedure .identifying events, occurrences, patterns and trends of potential abuse for residents. Performing internal facility investigations of alleged violations and identification of staff members responsible for investigating incidents and reporting of the same to proper authorities. Protecting residents from harm during an investigation of alleged abuse . Review of a facility in-service on abuse dated 3/6/2023 states in part, .Identification…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan relative to monitoring and identifying a change in a resident's condition. Additionally, the facility failed to follow physician's orders relative to weekly weights, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who exhibited increased swelling to his/her left leg and was diagnosed with a deep vein thrombosis (DVT- a blood clot). Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 6/19/2024, alleges in part, Resident ID #1's left leg doubled in size due to increased swelling, was not having his/her weight monitored, and the facility was not ruling out blood clots, despite him/her having a history. According to Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice 10th edition, 2014 published by Wolters Kluwer,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-22 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — patternProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate foot care was provided and arranged for 1 of 1 resident observed with overgrown toenails, Resident ID #2.Findings are as follows:Review of a facility policy titled Foot Care-Nail Clipping last revised 10/2022, states in part, Residents will be provided with foot care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice.Residents requiring toenail clipping will be referred to facility podiatrist or resident's podiatrist of choice.Record review revealed that Resident ID #2 was admitted to the facility in May of 2018 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, hemiplegia (complete paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) following a cerebrovascular disease (stroke) affecting the left non-dominant side and peripheral vascular disease.During a surveyor observation in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse, Staff P, on 6/16/2026 at 12:45 PM, Resident ID #2 was observed lying in bed in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide specialized dialysis care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the facility's policy by failing to monitor and document the patency of a newly placed Arteriovenous (AV) fistula (a surgically created connection between an artery and a vein that allows blood to flow directly from the artery into the vein, bypassing capillaries) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #6. Findings are as follows:Review of the facility's policy titled Dialysis Management, revised 10/2022, revealed: .The nurse will obtain orders for monitoring of site and interventions as appropriate. Orders to include. Access site/type.Observe shunt for thrills [vibrating or buzzing sensation felt over an AV fistula, often caused by turbulent blood flow] and bruits [sound heard over an AV fistula, typically due to turbulent blood flow] .every shift.Record review revealed that Resident ID #6 was admitted to the facility in February of 2026 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic kidney disease and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide and maintain a sanitary, safe, and comfortable environment by allowing the accumulation of extensive black and brown buildup throughout 3 of 3 communal shower rooms observed. Findings are as follows:A surveyor tour of the second, third, and fourth floor communal shower rooms revealed unsanitary conditions in all shower rooms observed.During a surveyor observation on 6/17/2026 at 8:11 AM, with Nursing Assistant, Staff A, the fourth-floor communal shower stall was observed to have a substantial accumulation of black and brown buildup along the lower one-fourth of the shower stall wall. Staff A acknowledged the presence of the buildup.During a surveyor observation conducted on 6/17/2026 at 8:25 AM, the third-floor communal shower stall was observed to have a similar accumulation of black and brown irregular buildup extending along the lower one-fourth of the shower stall wall.During a surveyor observation conducted on 6/17/2026 at 8:45 AM, with the Maintenance Staff, Staff C, the second-floor communal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to following physician's orders for 1 of 1 resident observed for enteral nutrition tube feeding, (a delivery of nutrition into the stomach or small intestine via an enteral access device), Resident ID #2.Findings are as follows:Review of a facility policy titled Enteral Feedings last revised on 10/2022, states in part, .Position resident in semi-Fowler's position or according to plan of care.Record review revealed that Resident ID#2 was admitted to the facility in May of 2018 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, hemiplegia (complete paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) due to cerebrovascular disease (a stroke) affecting the left non-dominant side and gastrostomy status (the medical state of a resident who has had a surgically created opening through the abdominal wall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident relative to urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to empty urine) use, gastrostomy (g tube; a surgically created opening through the abdominal wall into the stomach to allow for nutrition or medications) tube care, thickened liquids, and dialysis (a treatment to remove extra fluid and waste when kidneys can no longer do so adequately) for 5 of 5 licensed staff reviewed, Staff E, M, P, Q, and R.Findings are as follows:Review of the Facility Assessment dated 6/9/2026 states in part, A facility must develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff; individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement; and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles. A facility must determine the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed relative to end of life care, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows:Review of a facility policy titled, Electronic Medication Dispenser (EMD) dated 1/2023 states in part, Policy: To have a selection of oral medications available in the facility for immediate use.The pharmacy should deliver replacement medication used for the nurse to return to the EMD.Review of a community reported complaint received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 6/15/2026 revealed that Resident ID #1 was on hospice services and has not received his/her scheduled Morphine for more than 18 hours due to it not being available.Record review revealed that Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in June of 2026 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, pneumonia and respiratory failure.Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-22 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure food and fluids were provided in a modified form designed to meet the individual clinical needs for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for therapeutic diets, Resident #7. Findings are as follows:According to the OnTray, LLC. Long Term Care Diet Manual, 2025 Edition, provided by the facility, .Popsicles, Ice Cream, Sherbert, Freeze Pops, Frozen Lemonade, slushies, milk shakes, or any product that melts at body temperature .cannot be thickened.Record review revealed that Resident ID #7 was admitted to the facility in April of 2024 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Record review revealed a physician's order dated 3/10/2026 specifying a therapeutic diet consisting of Nectar Thick Liquids (Liquids that are thicker than water, fall slowly from a spoon).During a surveyor observation on 6/16/2026 at approximately 12:31 PM, Resident ID #7's meal tray was on the table in front of the resident. The meal tray contained a 4-ounce pre-packaged container…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment, in a safe operating condition for the walk-in freezer unit in the main kitchen.Findings are as follows:Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 10/15/2025 alleged in part, a concern related to residents experiencing foodborne illness while at the facility. Record review of Rhode Island Food Code, 2022 Edition, Section 4-501.11 states in part, .EQUIPMENT shall be maintained in a state of repair and condition that meets the requirements specified under Parts 4-1 and 4-2 . During the initial tour of the kitchen on 12/1/2025 at approximately 11:00 AM, the walk-in freezer was holding at an ambient temperature of 28 degrees Fahrenheit. Additionally, the following items were observed in a partially thawed condition:- one bag containing approximately 5 pounds (lbs.) of chicken wings- one bag containing approximately 5 lbs. of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a physician's order for a neck brace, Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states, .The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients .Record review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 10/27/2025 states in part, the resident has a neck fracture requiring a neck brace and was neglected.Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in October of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, type 2 odontoid fracture (a fracture at the base of the second cervical vertebra).Record review revealed a physician's order dated 10/24/2025 for a neck brace to be applied at all times.Record review of the October 2025 Treatment Administration Record revealed that s/he had not received his/her neck…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that all residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards, relative to follow up physician appointments for 2 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 11 and 85. Findings are as follows:1. Record review revealed that Resident ID #11 was readmitted to the facility in May of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, type II diabetes and hypertension (high blood pressure).Record review revealed Resident ID #11 was transferred to the hospital on 5/4/2025 due to abdominal pain and vomiting.Review of a Discharge Summary dated 5/7/2025, revealed a referral to outpatient cardiology for chest pain.Review of a progress note dated 5/8/2025, authored by Nurse Practitioner, Staff F, revealed, the resident was seen in the hospital for chest pain and shortness of breath and is to follow up outpatient cardiology.Record review failed to reveal evidence that Resident ID #11 had a follow up appointment with outpatient cardiology.During a surveyor interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for antibiotics, Resident ID #85, 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pain management, Resident ID #82, and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for divalproex sodium (Depakote, a medication prescribed for off-label use to manage agitation and other challenging behaviors in dementia patients), Resident ID #30.Findings are as follows:A. Record review revealed Resident ID #82 was readmitted to the facility in April of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, low back pain and polyneuropathy (a disorder that affects nerves throughout the body potentially causing pain).Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS) of 12 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Additionally, it revealed that s/he has pain almost constantly.Review of a care plan focus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, staff, resident, and resident representative interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident is treated with respect and dignity relative to 2 of 3 residents reviewed who required staff assistance for incontinence, Resident ID #s 2 and 90.Findings are as follows:1. Record review revealed Resident ID #2 was re-admitted to the facility in March of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) affecting right dominant side and benign prostatic hyperplasia (noncancerous enlargement of the prostate gland) with lower urinary tract symptoms.Record review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed, the resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating s/he is cognitively intact. Additionally, s/he is always incontinent of bowel and is dependent on staff for toileting.During a surveyor interview with Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident relative to urinary catheters for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #16. Findings are as follows:Review of a Clinical Competency dated 11/2017 states in part, Emptying a Urinary Drainage Bag.carefully measure urine in measuring cylinder.Record review revealed that Resident ID #16 was admitted to the facility in August of 2016 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, multiple sclerosis and neurogenic dysfunction of the bladder.Record review of a care plan revealed a focus area dated 9/18/2024 indicating, s/he has a suprapubic catheter with an intervention to monitor output for odor, color, consistency, amount, blood and sediment.Review of the Bladder Continence Task, question 3: catheter output for the last 30 days revealed 10 out of 30 days with no output documented.During a surveyor interview on 10/1/2025 at 8:10 AM with Nursing Assistant (NA), Staff C, she revealed that if a resident has a catheter the output…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing for 1 of 2 residents observed for wound care, Resident ID #14. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Clean Dressing Technique, states in part, .Procedure: Check physician order for current, correct treatment.Sanitize hands and apply clean gloves. Remove old dressing and discard.Remove gloves, sanitize hands and apply clean gloves.Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in September of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, type I diabetes and pressure wounds to his/her left heel, right foot, right hip, and sacrum (the lower back/base of the spine).Review of a care plan focus area dated 9/4/2025 revealed, the resident has multiple pressure wounds and that s/he is seen by the wound physician weekly. Additionally, it indicates to treat the wounds, as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store and label drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 3 floors observed, the 3rd floor. Findings are as follows:1. During the medication storage and labeling task on 9/29/2025 at approximately 9:25 AM, in the presence of Certified Medication Technician (CMT), Staff K, observation of the 3rd Floor Northwest CMT medication cart revealed, 3 medication cups labeled with residents' room numbers containing multiple medications in each cup.During a surveyor interview at the time of the above observation with Staff K, he indicated that he pre-poured the resident's medications and that the residents were unavailable at the time they were prepared.During a surveyor interview on 9/28/2025 at 1:28 PM with the Director of Nursing Services (DNS), she indicated that pre-pouring medications is against the facility's policy and would expect the medications to be disposed of if the residents were unavailable. 2a. Review of a facility policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a splint, Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Review of a facility policy titled, SPLINTS/ORTHOTICS/PROSTHETICS, dated April 2015 states in part, .Upon admission/readmission, and at least every shift, all residents with a splint.will have the affected extremity monitored for circulation, motion and sensation [CSM] as well as any signs of edema [swelling], redness, irritation, or pressure areas potentially caused by the device.Nursing staff will remove the device and notify the physician and the rehabilitation department if the resident has actual or potential alteration in skin integrity that may have been caused by the device.Document evaluations and notify MD [medical doctor] of any abnormalities.Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in May of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to honor a resident's right to request treatment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a hospital transfer, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported complaint received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/30/2025 alleged that Resident ID #1 requested to be sent out to the hospital for pain, however the facility refused the request because there was no order from a physician. Additionally Resident ID #1 called 911 from her/his personal cell phone and was transported to the hospital where a significant injury was identified. Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in January of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, stroke, renal disease, and diabetes. Record review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, indicating s/he is cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to following physician orders for antibiotic therapy and an for monitoring the output of an indwelling foley catheter (a device that drains urine from your urinary bladder into a collection bag outside of your body when you can't urinate on your own), for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of two community reported complaints, both submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 12/2/2024, allege that Resident ID #1 had been hospitalized 4 times in less than a month and was readmitted to the facility in November of 2024 with diagnoses of hypernatremia (sodium levels in the blood being too high. Common causes include inadequate fluid intake, or fluid loss), dehydration and sepsis pneumonia (a potentially life-threatening condition that arises when the body's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections, relative to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP; involves using a gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities), an enteral feeding (a method of delivering nutrition directly into the gastrointestinal tract through a feeding tube) syringe and the storage of a nebulizer mask, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy states in part, Enhanced Barrier precautions require the use of a gown and gloves for certain residents during high-contact resident care activities .High-contact resident care activities include bathing/showering, providing hygiene, dressing, transferring, linen changes, toileting, device care and wound care . Enhanced Barrier precautions will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain the resident's medical record in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of two community reported complaints, both submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 12/2/2024, allege that Resident ID #1 had been hospitalized and that the resident did not receive his/her prescribed antibiotic therapy at the facility after s/he was discharged from the hospital. Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was readmitted to the facility in November of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, hypernatremia, dehydration, and sepsis pneumonia. Record review of the hospital Continuity of Care document dated 11/27/2024 revealed a physician's order to continue Amoxicillin-Pot Clavulanate (an antibiotic) Oral Suspension Reconstituted 250-62.5 milligram (MG)/5 milliliters (ML) two times a day for sepsis, for 3 days. Record review of a physician's order dated 11/28/2024 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality relative to evaluating a resident after a suspected medication error occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 10/5/2024 indicated that Resident ID #1 was transferred to an acute care hospital because s/he potentially received antipsychotic medication intended for another resident and was noted with a change in his/her mental status. Review of a facility policy and procedure dated April 2015 titled, MEDICATION ERROR REPORTING states in part, .A Medication error is any preventable event that may cause or lead to inappropriate medication use, which the medication is in the control of the health care professional . - A licensed nurse makes an immediate evaluation of the resident in relation to the nature of the error . - Follow-up notes are written…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections by failing to implement appropriate precautions, documentation of follow-up activity in response and comply with state and local public health authority requirements for identification, reporting, and containing communicable diseases and outbreaks. Furthermore, the facility failed to don [put on] the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) prior to entering resident rooms that required precautions for 1 of 2 units reviewed. Findings are as follows: 1. Review of a facility policy titled, RI CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) exposure states in part, This facility follows the professional standards and recommendations set forth by the Center of Disease Control [CDC], CMS [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] and state health care agencies regarding coronavirus .The facility will actively screen all employees, vendors, and delivery personnel upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to following physicians' orders for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for intake and output (I&O), Resident ID #s 26, 30, 61, and 104. Findings are as follows: According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing page 314, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. Review of the facility's policy and procedure for INTAKE AND OUTPUT MONITORING dated April, 2015 states in part, .Intake and Output will be monitored, as indicated by the resident's hydration status, risk for dehydration, and/or per physician's order .Intake and Output is documented for each shift, beginning with the 11 to 7 shift .Intake and Output is totaled daily by the 3 to 11 shift nurse and the 24 hour totals are transcribed to the Medication Administration Record . 1. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight, for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for significant weight loss and/or gain, Resident ID #s 76, 96, and 104. Findings are as follows: Record review of the policy titled, Weights, last revised in August 2015, states in part, The following residents/patients are weighed weekly X4 [for four weeks] .Residents/patients with an MD [doctor] order for weekly weights .The same scale should be used for each weighing of a particular resident/patient to ensure consistency and more accurate weights .All weight loss/gain of 3 pounds or more on a resident weighing 100 pounds or less and weight loss/gain of 5 pounds or more on a resident weighing 100 pounds or more requires a reweigh for verification. A reweigh is done on the same scale with a licensed nurse present. Weights are documented in the resident's/patient's medical record and/or weight book. If a significant weight loss/gain is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0699 — patternProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care, in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences, in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, relative to a resident with history of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Resident ID #96. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in October of 2023, with diagnoses including, but not limited to, PTSD, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of a document titled Social Service Trauma-Informed Care Screening Tool dated 10/3/2023, revealed a series of 7 questions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who are fed by a feeding tube receive the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 of 2 residents reviewed relative to a gastrostomy tube (G-tube, which is a surgically placed device used to give direct access to the stomach for supplemental feeding, hydration or medicine), Resident ID #76. Findings are as follows: Review of the policy titled Enteral Feeding dated April 2015 states in part, PROCEDURE .Elevate head of bed 30-45 degrees . Record review revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility in February of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and Alzheimer's disease. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 2/17/2024 to elevate the resident 30-45 degrees at all times during feeding and for one hour after gravity feeds or resident must be elevated at all times with continuous feeding. Further record review revealed a physician's order dated 8/1/2024 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident receives treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for the use of Humira (a medication used to treat rheumatoid arthritis), Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed that Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in March of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, infection following a surgical procedure, rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes. Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 6/26/2024 revealed that the resident had multiple concerns relative to the care s/he received while at the facility. Review of the physician orders revealed the following: -Humira subcutaneous pen -injector kit 40 MG (milligram)/0.8ML(milliliter) inject 1 application subcutaneously one time a day every 2 weeks on Friday. With a start date of 3/29/2024 and a discontinue (dc) date of 5/4/2024. -Humira subcutaneous pen-injector kit 40 MG/0.8ML…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to protect and keep residents free from physical abuse relative to an incident that occurred between Resident ID #1 and Resident ID #5. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/9/2024 revealed a nursing assistant (NA) entered Resident ID #5's room at 4:00 PM and observed Resident ID #1 with his/her hands around Resident ID #5's neck. The residents were immediately separated, and Resident ID #1 was sent to the hospital for an evaluation. Record review of the facility policy titled Resident Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation Prevention Policy dated April, 2015 states in part, Policy: Each resident has the right to be free from abuse .Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting harm, pain or mental anguish . Record review revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for the management of a Multidrug-resistant Organism (MDRO), Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) document titled, Multidrug-resistant organisms management (MDRO) states in part, .For ill residents (e.g., those totally dependent upon healthcare personnel for healthcare and activities of daily living use Contact Precautions [use of gown and gloves when entering a resident's room] .Implement Contact Precautions (CP) routinely for all patients colonized or infected with a target MDRO .modify CP to allow MDRO .colonized/infected patients whose site of colonization or infection can be appropriately contained and who can observe good hand hygiene practices to enter common areas and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to keep a resident free from sexual abuse for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #4 and for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for physical abuse, Resident ID #2. Findings are as follows: 1. The State Operations Manual Appendix PP - Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, last revised 2/3/2023, states in part, .sexual contact is nonconsensual if the resident .lacks the cognitive ability to consent .CMS is not requiring facilities to adopt a specific approach in determining a resident's capacity to consent .in order to assist in the development and implementation of policy related to aspects of .intimacy and relationships .Allegations of Sexual Abuse .There are additional considerations when investigating allegations of sexual abuse involving .Resident to resident sexual abuse . For any alleged violation of sexual abuse, the facility must: - Immediately implement safeguards to prevent further potential abuse; -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made to the State Agency in accordance with State law for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for sexual abuse, Resident ID #4. Findings are as follows: The State Operations Manual Appendix PP - Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, last revised 2/3/2023, states in part, .sexual contact is nonconsensual if the resident .lacks the cognitive ability to consent . Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention, Neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation prevention policy dated April 2015, states in part, .Each resident has the right to be free from abuse .It is the policy of all [NAME] Health Care Systems facilities to implement policies to .identify, investigate and report allegations of abuse .employees are expected to identify and report potential or actual occurrences of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-04 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident within 48 hours of a resident's admission, that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with inappropriate sexual behaviors, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: According to the State Operations Manual, Appendix PP- Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, revised on 2/3/2023, §483.21(a)(1) The facility must develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. The baseline care plan must- (i) Be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission. (ii) Include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident including, but not limited to- (A) Initial goals based on admission orders. (B)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored, served, and distributed, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, relative to the main kitchen and for 3 of 3 unit kitchenettes observed. Findings are as follows: 1. The Rhode Island Food Code 2018 Edition 2-402.11 states in part, .food employees shall wear hair restraints, beard restraints that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed food . During surveyor observations in the main kitchen revealed the following: -9/25/2023 at approximately 8:40 AM dietary staff, Staff M and N, were observed without beard restraints. -9/25/2023 at approximately 2:30 PM, dietary staff, Staff O, was observed without a beard restraint. -9/26/2023 at approximately 11:20 AM dietary staff, Staff M and N were observed without beard restraints. -9/27/2023 at approximately 1:15 PM, dietary staff, Staff M, was observed without a beard restraint. -9/27/2023 at approximately 3:30 PM, dietary staff, Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, including injuries of unknown source are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or no later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to other officials (Department of Health), in accordance with State law for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for misappropriation, and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for injury of unknown origin, Resident ID #s 7 and 20. Findings are as follows: Record review of the facility policy titled, ABUSE PROHIBITION POLICY states in part, .Reporting/Documentation Requirements .The Administrator, Director of Nursing or their designee assumes responsibility for the immediate verbal notification of the incident to the following .3. The Department of Public Health: All alleged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality relative to physician's orders, for 1 of 2 residents with recommendations from an outside consultant, Resident ID #35, 1 of 7 residents reviewed for medication administration, Resident ID #107, 4 of 13 residents with an air mattress, Resident ID #s 11, 58, 73, and 102, and 1 of 1 resident observed during a wound treatment, Resident ID# 88. Findings are as follows: A. According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states in part, .The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment, Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients . 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #35 was admitted to the facility in June of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, adult failure to thrive and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (under nutrition). Review of a physician's order dated 4/10/2023 states, Consult- GI [gastroenterology]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living (ADL's) do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrate that such a diminution was unavoidable, relative to transfer, ambulation, toileting and incontinence care for 1 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident ID# 9. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in April of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition), adult failure to thrive (FTT), neuroleptic induced parkinsonism (parkinsonism caused by antipsychotic, neuroleptic, medication) and major depressive disorder. Record review of the Annual Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed s/he required supervision assistance of one staff member for bed mobility, transfer, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary services to a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs), relative to showers for 2 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 35 and 73. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review for Resident ID #35 revealed s/he was readmitted to the facility in December of 2022 with medical diagnoses including, but not limited to, spinal stenosis (the narrowing of the spine which puts pressure on the spinal cord and nerves and can cause pain) and difficulty walking. Record review of an Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that it is very important for him/her to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath, or sponge bath. Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Additionally, s/he is documented as requiring the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices, for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for positioning, Resident ID #73. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility in July of 2021 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, stroke, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left side (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body). Record review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Additionally, the MDS revealed s/he requires total assistance of two or more staff members for transferring and locomotion. Record review of a care plan dated 8/31/2022 revealed the resident has contractures (tightening of the muscle causing difficulty with movement)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure residents that are fed through a feeding tube receive the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 of 2 residents reviewed who receive nutrition via a feeding tube, Resident ID #85. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in February of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, adult failure to thrive and Alzheimer's disease. Record review of a physician order dated September 2023 states in part, .Jevity 1.2 Cal (a high protein, fiber fortified liquid nutritional supplement) Oral Liquid Nutritional Supplement Bolus (a method of manually providing formula through a feeding tube) 240 ml (milliliters) four times a day . Record review of the manufacturer instructions on the Jevity 1.2 Cal 1000 ml container states in part, .once opened, reclose, refrigerate, and use within 48 hours . Surveyor observation on 9/26/2023 at approximately 2:30 PM revealed Licensed Practical Nurse, Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives necessary respiratory care and services that are in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care, Resident ID #s 10 and 41. Findings are as follows: Record review of the facility policy titled, OXYGEN ADMINISTRATION NASAL CANNULA states in part, .To deliver low flow oxygen, per the physician's order .via nasal cannula .Set the Oxygen liter flow to the prescribed liters flow per minute .Replace and date cannula and tubing weekly or when visibly soiled or damaged . 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #10 was admitted to the facility in October of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation. Surveyor observations of the resident revealed s/he was receiving oxygen therapy via nasal cannula at 1 liter per minute on the following dates and times: 9/25/2023 at 10:12 AM 9/26/2023 at 9:09 AM 9/27/2023 at 10:00 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility has failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 7 residents reviewed relative to medication administration, Resident ID #103. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in July of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, hyperosmolality (condition where the blood has a high concentration of solutes) and Hypernatremia (increased sodium concentration in the blood), alcohol abuse with alcohol -induced psychotic disorder, and liver disease. Record review of a laboratory report dated 9/26/2023, states in part, .L[low] potassium 3.1 MEQ/L [milliequivalents/liter]. Additionally, instructions handwritten at the bottom of the report reads, Potassium 40 MEQ tonight only .Potassium 10 MEQ [NAME] [daily] . Record review of the September 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed an order dated 9/26/2023 to administer Potassium…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for 1 of 1 resident observed to have their call light placed out of their reach, Resident ID #23. Findings are as follows: According to the facility policy titled, Call Light, Use Of, dated April 2015, states in part, .resident/patients will have a call light or alternative communication device within his/her reach when unattended .When providing care to residents/patients be sure to position the call light conveniently, telling/showing resident/patient where the call light is located . Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in June of 2011 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following a stroke affecting the right dominant side. Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality relative to following physician's orders for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #2. Findings are as follows: Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. Review of the resident's record revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, heart failure and shortness of breath. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12 out of 15 indicating that his/her cognition is moderately impaired. Record review revealed the following physician's orders: - 3/17/2023 -Ted Stocking (socks to help prevent blood clots and swelling in the legs) on during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records that are accurately documented in accordance with professional standards and practices for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for inaccurate documentation, relative to the use of a compression sleeve, [NAME] stockings and offloading the resident's heels, Resident ID #2. Findings are as follows: Review of the resident's record revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, heart failure and shortness of breath. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12 out of 15 indicating that his/her cognition is moderately impaired. Record review revealed the following physician's orders: - 3/17/2023 -Ted Stocking (socks to help prevent blood clots and swelling in the legs) on during the day and off at night for history of pulmonary embolism (condition in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$111,098 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $25,805 — penalty dated 2025-11-25
- $51,174 — penalty dated 2025-08-06
- $24,086 — penalty dated 2024-09-12
- $10,033 — penalty dated 2024-06-24
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ADVINIACARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RI 5 HOLDCO OP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/30/2026 |
| BENJAMIN BERKOWITZ REVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/30/2026 |
| ENYKRI, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/30/2026 |
| LEAH BRAUN TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/30/2026 |
| RI 5 INVESTOR GROUP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/30/2026 |
| BRAUN, SHRAGA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/30/2026 |
| 1219 LIMTED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| 257 LIMTED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| 42170 LIMTED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| BIDER FAMILY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| BUNNELI, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| CBA II, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| F SQUARED INVESTMENTS, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| FREDERICK S FRANKEL TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| JACK YOLINSKY REVOCABLE TRUST AGREEMENT DATED 2/18/11 | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| JOSHUA HOFFMAN TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| MARLEE ASSOCIATES | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| MSAR ENTERPRISES, LP | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| PEARL KAHAN 2023 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| ROBIN MILLER REVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| S&D INVESTMENTS | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| SILVER EQUITIES | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| WILHELM LEGACY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| YCD GROUP, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| BIDER, TZVI | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| BLOCH, SAMUEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| BRAM, TOVA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| FRANKEL, FREDERICK | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| GOLDFARB, BRIAN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| HAMUI, MORIEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| HOFFMAN, JOSHUA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| KAHAN, JEROME | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| KATZ, SHMUEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| KROLL, JOETTE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| KUTOFF, ELIYAHU | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| LEINER, SIMCHA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| LEINER, YISROEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| MANDELBAUM, AVRAHAM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| MEYSTEL, JOEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| RAPOPORT, YITZCHOK | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| ROSENBERG, ZEV | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| RUSSELL, ARYEH | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| SALAMON, ISRAEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| SALAMON, MARK | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| SALAMON, NATHANIEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| SPECTOR, JENNIFER | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| SUSSMAN, JOEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| TOBER, YEHUDA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| TWERSKI, BASSHEVA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| ULBERT, LISA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| WILHELM, NAFTALI | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| WILHELM, YEHOSHUA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| YOLINSKY, JACK | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| ADVINIACARE, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| MCGINNESS, BRIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| SPIEGEL, PAUL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| TALAMONA, RAYMOND | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| TUROFSKY, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| WOODRUFF, KIMBERLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| BERKOWITZ, BENJAMIN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/26/2026 |
| BRAUN, LEAH | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/26/2026 |
| ADVINIA PROPERTIES, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| CUMBERLAND HILL, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/03/2026 |
| CURIS SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| DAVID A BERKOWITZ DELTA TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| POINTE PROPERTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| RI 5 HOLDCO PROP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| YOSEF MEYSTEL DELTA TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 84 rows in the source record cover these 68 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
31 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in RI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Rhode Island Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 415110. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.