Adviniacare Newburyport
180 Low Street, Newburyport, MA 01950 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 111 certified beds · (978) 465-5361 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $322,104 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-10)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- about 27% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 28.2% | 16.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.5% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.5% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.7% | 1.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 36.8% | 15.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.9% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 27.6% | 15.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.5% | 19.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.0% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.6% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 38.2% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.4% | 21.4% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.7% | 77.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.9% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 20.6% | 11.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.45 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.78 | 1.50 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 322 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 64.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 113 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.5%CMS range 50.1–59.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 8.7–13.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 64.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 58.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 62.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 90.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 4.1–10.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.80 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 111 beds and averages 103.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
72 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 54 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. For Resident #63, the facility failed to complete post fall assessments and implement interventions after a fall. Review of the facility policy titled, Fall Prevention, dated 1/23. Indicated the following: * fall risk assessments will be completed for all residents initially on admission, readmission, quarterly, significant change and after an identified fall. Resident #63 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnoses including history of falling, Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #63 most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the Resident has severe cognition and requires limited assist for personal care. Review of Resident #63's medical record indicated the Resident had a fall on the following dates: 6/15/23, 7/14/23, 9/8/23 and 9/27/23. Further review of medical record failed to indicate a post fall assessment and interventions were put in place after these falls. During an interview on 10/26/23 at 9:36 A.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said after each fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-11-07 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that they implemented and maintained an effective training program for all new hires, consistent with their expected roles, and failed to determine the amount and type of training necessary based on the facility assessment. Specifically, 22 out of 22 new staff hired in 2023 to date, were not provided training, therefore, failing to ensure competent, safe, and effective resident care. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment indicated the following: -3.4 Every new hire must meet the minimum education and training requirements to hold and maintain their professional licensures and certifications. All new hires go through general orientation. At orientation, attendees are educated on the following: organizational structure, mission statement, philosophy of care, the characteristics of our resident population, federal and state regulations, OBRA, quality of care, quality of life, resident rights, resident bill of rights, facility practices, behavior policy, Joint Commission, QAPI process, OSHA,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and policy review the facility failed to follow the correct therapeutic menu (mechanical soft) for four Residents (#62, #53, #50 and #4) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically, 1. Resident #62, who has a known history of choking twice at the facility, requiring the Heimlich maneuver and emergent transfer to the hosital, was observed to be served the incorrect diet, placing the Resident at serious risk of a repeated choking incident and/or death, 2. Resident #53 who has a long-standing history of dysphagia (difficulty chewing and swallowing), was served food not on his/her recommended diet, and 3. two Residents (#50 and #4) were provided a meal not in accordance with the physician's order. Findings include: 1. Resident #62 was admitted to the facility in October 2021 and in June 2023 Resident #62 was diagnosed with Dysphagia (difficulty chewing and swallowing). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 9/14/23, indicated Resident #62 had a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-07 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner that enabled the facility to use its resources effectively to attain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the facility administration failed to ensure orientation, education and training was provided to all staff to provide competent, safe, and effective resident care as well as ensuring the governance and leadership members sustain a sufficient Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program during transitions in leadership and staffing. Findings include: During the survey process it was identified that the Administration's failure to orient and educate staff on policies and procedures specifically related to resident's care and services resulted in residents who required therapeutic diets and supervision while eating to receive incorrect diets and insufficient supervision during meals which lead to at least one episode of choking for a resident with a history of choking. The Resident required the Heimlich…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-07 · tag F0837 — isolatedEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review including the Facility Assessment and facility policies, the facility failed to ensure that the governing body provided oversight and accountability for: 1. ensuring education and competencies were completed per Facility Assessment on hire for 22 out of 22 employees hired since January 2023; 2. ensuring quality of care related to the safety and hazards in the facility was maintained for one Resident (#62) out of a total sample of 34; and 3. ensuring the governance and leadership members sustain a sufficient QAPI program during transitions in leadership and staffing. As a result of the governing body's failure, the facility failed to develop a plan to ensure the facility could safely provide the services to meet the needs of the residents as well as implement an effective QAPI program. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated as reviewed with the QAPI committee, in October 2023, indicated that the Governing Body included, but was not limited to, the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one Resident (#49) out of a total sample of 27 Residents, and ensure an environment free from accidents and hazards in two resident rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure that Resident #49 was not left unattended in the dining room, subsequently the Resident sustained a fall resulting in nasal fracture. 2. Properly store oxygen cylinders in an upright and firmly secured manner on two out of three units. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Accidents and Incidents, revised October 2022, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: - An incident is any occurrence not consistent with the routine operation of the center, normal care of the resident, a happening involving visitors, malfunctioning equipment, or observation of a condition which might be a safety hazard. The occurrence may be a fall, skin tear, bruise, new pressure ulcer and may involve abuse, neglect, and mistreatment or an injury of unknown origin. - All incidents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to 1. assist one Resident (#9) with oral care resulting in candidiasis and a mouth sore, 2. failed to ensure Residents ( #133, #35, and #40) were provided the level of assistance required for meals and 3. failed to ensure Residents (#23, #133 and #31), who are dependent for daily care, were provided morning care in care in accordance to their needs, out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, ADL Support, dated 10/22 indicated the following: -Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. -Care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out their ADLs independently, with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-11-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from the deprivation of goods and services by staff for one Resident (#9), specifically failing to provide the plan of care for daily denture cleaning, resulting oral candidiasis and a mouth sore, out of a total of 34 residents: Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, dated 10/23/22, indicated the following: - Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. - Neglect: failure to provide goods or services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness. Review of the facility policy titled Dentures, dated 10/2022, indicated the following: - Direct care staff will assist residents with denture care, including removal, cleaning, and storage of dentures. Resident #9 was admitted in 10/2020 with diagnoses including dementia and hypertension.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure treatment and care was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#87) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, for Resident #87 the facility failed to ensure timely treatment was provided when the Resident experienced a change in condition following a fall, that resulted in a fractured femur. Findings include:The facility policy titled Change in Condition, dated 7/2019, indicated the following:-Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g., changes in level of care, billing/payments, resident rights, etc.).1. The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or physician on call when there has been a (an):a. accident or incident involving the resident;d. significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/medical condition;g. need to transfer the resident to a hospital/treatment center.2. A significant change of condition is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow up on a significant weight change for two Residents (#21 and #98) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to assess two Residents with significant weight changes in a timely manner, as indicated in the facility policy.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Weight Assessment and Interventions, revised 05/2019, indicated the following: Monthly weights will be obtained each month or as ordered by physician. Weights will be recorded in the medical record (electronic health record where available) for each resident. Any weight change of 5lb in a month and 3lbs in a week since their last assessment should be retaken within 72 hours for confirmation and verified by nursing. Licensed nurse should notify dietitian of identified weight change once reviewed. Dietitian notification should be documented within resident's medical record. Dietitian or diet technician should respond within 72 hours of receipt of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#109) out of a total sample of 21 residents, who required a vascular access device (device that provides access to the veins for the delivery of medications or fluids).Specifically, the facility failed to provide care and maintenance of Resident #109's midline catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a peripheral vein above the elbow that ends just below the axilla [armpit]) and monitor for catheter related complications. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled 'Midline Dressing Change' dated January 2023, indicated the following:-Transparent dressings are changed every 7 days or sooner if the integrity of the dressing is compromised (wet, soiled, or loose).-Assessment is to include the absence or presence of erythema, drainage, swelling, induration, skin temperature at site, or complaint of tenderness at the site or along the vein tract.-Apply transparent dressing with insertion site centered in the dressing.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain Contact Precautions while administering medication to a resident. Findings include:Review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website indicated the following, dated June 28, 2024:- Contact Precautions require the use of gown and gloves on every entry into a resident's room, regardless of the level of care being provided to the resident. Residents on Contact Precautions are recommended to be restricted to their rooms and restricted from participation in group activities. On 9/17/25 at 8:50 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #2 entering a resident's room to administer medications. Beside the entrance of the resident room was a sign that indicated:- Contact Precautions- Everyone must: - Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room.- Providers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that sufficient staffing levels were maintained to safely and adequately meet each resident's personal care needs. Finding include: Review of the facility assessment indicated the following: -Our Resident Profile: 111 number of beds. Average daily census 89-94 residents -Staffing Plan: 1 DON (Director of Nurses) RN (Registered Nurse) full-time days; ASST (Assistant Director of Nurses) RN full-time days; RN or LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse): 2 for each shift 2-3 RN/LPN per shift; per unit Direct Care Staff: 3-4 CNA per shift; per unit Registered Nurses & LP Nurses total number needed 18. Number of weekly Hours 1008. Certified Nursing Assistants total number needed 33. Number of weekly Hours 1848. -Individual staff assignment is based on staff competency and preference to the type of care they like to provide and have experience providing i.e. residents with advanced dementia vs. short term rehab patients. The facility strives to maintain consistent assignments to ensure continuity of resident and care giver…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to store and handle food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled in the main kitchen and on the unit kitchenettes and that staff did not contaminate ready to eat food during service. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Food Storage (Dry, Refrigerated, and Frozen), dated 2020, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: - All food items will be labeled. The label must include the name of the food and the date by which it should be sold, consumed, or discarded. - Discard food that has passed the expiration date, and discard food that has been prepared in the facility after seven days of storing under proper refrigeration. - Leftover contents of cans and prepared food will be stored in covered, labeled, and dated containers in refrigerators and/or freezers. Review of the facility's policy titled HACCP (Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point) and Food Safety, dated 2013, indicated, but was not limited to, the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were accurately completed to reflect the status of one Resident (#25) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to document that Resident #25 is receiving antipsychotic medication. Findings Include: Resident #25 was admitted to the facility in September 2022 with diagnoses that include Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety Disorder. Review of Resident #25's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 8/16/24, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15, indicating that Resident #25 has moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS failed to indicate receiving antipsychotic medication. Review of Resident #25's physician's orders indicated the following order dated 7/18/24: -Abilify (an antipsychotic medication) oral tablet 5 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time a day for mood depression. Review of Resident #25's August 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated that the Resident received abilify once daily from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two Residents (#36 and #18) out of a sample of 27 residents. Specifically, 1(a) For Resident #36, the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans for a history of alcohol abuse and, (b) a history of suicidal ideation. 2. For Resident #18, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a history of alcohol abuse on admission. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Care Plan-Comprehensive' with a revision date of October 2022 indicated the following: -A comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. -The Interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for one Resident (#52), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically for Resident #52, the facility failed to assess the diet texture for Resident #52 after swallowing incident. Findings include: Resident #52 was admitted to the facility in October 2021 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, diabetes, traumatic brain injury, and vitamin D deficiency. In June 2023, Resident #52 was diagnosed with dysphagia (difficulty chewing and swallowing). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/24/24, indicated Resident #52 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam score of 3 out of a possible 15, which indicated he/she had severely impaired cognition. The MDS further indicated Resident #52 requires partial/moderate physical assistance with eating and is on a therapeutic diet. Review of Resident #52's medical record indicated he/she choked while eating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide supervision with meals for two Residents, (#34 and #52) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Supporting, dated as revised June 2022, indicated Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: D. dining (meals and snacks). 1. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility in August 2021 with diagnoses including dysphagia, gastro esophageal reflux disease, hyperlipidemia, and vitamin D deficiency. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/26/24, indicated Resident #34…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 54 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5% when one out of two nurses observed made two errors out of 25 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 8%. Those errors impacted one Resident (#52), out of two residents observed. Specifically, for Resident #52, Nurse #2 failed to administer the correct doses of his/her medications. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Medication Administration, dated as revised 10/2022 indicated the following: -3. Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. -6. The medications nurse shall assure that the correct medication is administered by checking the physician's order and the medication label. Review of facility policy titled Physician Orders, dated as revised 10/2022 indicated the following: -Medication orders will include: -c. dosage Resident #52 was admitted to the facility in October 2021 with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviewed and interviews the facility failed to ensure nursing maintained an accurate medical record for one Resident (#49) out of a sample of 27 residents. Specifically, for Resident #49 nursing documented they obtained blood pressure from his/her left arm when they did not. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Charting and Documentations, revised January 2023, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: - All observations, medications administered, services performed, etc., must be documented in the resident's clinical records. Resident #49 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with a diagnosis of dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #49 scored a 0 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating the Resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #49's active physician orders indicated the following order: - No IVs (intravenous)/ blood draws/BP (blood pressure readings) on left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #3), who required extensive assistance of two staff members for transfers, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed his/her plan of care, when on 01/30/24, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #2 transferred Resident #3 by herself without another staff member present to assist and Resident #3 ended up on the floor. Findings Include: The Facility Policy titled, Care Plan-Comprehensive, dated as last revised 10/22/22, indicated that a comprehensive person-centered Care Plan that includes measurable objectives, and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The Policy indicated that the services provided or arranged by the Facility, as outlined by the comprehensive Care Plan shall be provided by qualified persons in accordance with each resident's written plan of care. Resident #3 was admitted to the Facility in January 2024, diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, weakness, lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who during the provision of personal care on the evening shift on 11/09/23 by a staff member (later identified as Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #3) experienced a fall out of bed when his/her legs slid off the bed, causing his/her lower torso to slide off the bed and him/her landing on both knees on the floor, the facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with quality of care that met acceptable standards of practice, when CNA #3 picked Resident #1's lower torso/legs up off the floor and placed him/her back into bed, however CNA #3 had not notified his/her nurse or anyone one else in nursing about the fall. The following morning, Resident #1 was observed with extensive swelling to his/her right leg, complained of pain to his/her right leg, x-rays revealed he/she had a right femur (thigh bone) fracture, and he/she was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department for further evaluation and treatment. Findings Include:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #3), who required extensive assistance of two staff members for transfers, the Facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided the necessary level of assistance to maintain his/her safety to prevent an incident or accident, when on 01/30/24 he/she was transferred by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #2 without the assistance of another staff member and without the use of a gait belt, per Facility Policy, and he/she sustained a fall. Findings Include: The Facility Policy titled, Fall Prevention and Management, dated as revised 01/2023, indicated that the interdisciplinary team identifies and implements appropriate interventions to reduce the risk of falls or injuries while maximizing dignity and independence. The Facility Policy titled, Gait Belts-Transfers, dated as revised 01/2023, indicated it was the policy of the Facility to utilize gait belts when applicable to promote safety in transfer, ambulation, and balance to minimize the risk of injury to the resident and caregiver. The Policy indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was observed with a right swollen leg, complained of pain, and reported to staff that he/she had fallen out of bed, the Facility failed to ensure the Nurse Practitioner's STAT x-ray order was sent to the Radiology Company in a timely manner. Findings Include: The Facility Policy titled Diagnostic Services, dated as revised 01/2023, indicated clinical laboratory and radiology services shall be available twenty-four hours a day, seven days per week, for all residents onsite. The Policy indicated all diagnostic testing procedures shall be performed as ordered by a Physician or licensed independent Practitioner. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in June 2022, diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait, unsteadiness on feet, and essential tremor. Review of the Facility Incident Report, dated 11/10/23, indicated that a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA, later identified as CNA #2) reported Resident #1 stated he/she fell…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure 1) medications with short expirations dates, were dated when opened and 2) Medications were not left in resident's room without an assessment 3) a treatment cart was locked and secured while unattended. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Medication Storage', revised 10/2022, indicated the following but not limited to: *With the exception of emergency drug kits, all medications will be stored in a locked cabinet, cart or medication room that is accessible only to authorized personnel, as defined by facility policy. *Multi-dose vials which have been opened or accessed (example, needle-punctured) should be dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a different (shorter or longer) date for that opened vial. *Medications for external use will be stored separately from medications for internal use. Ophthalmic (eye), otic (ear) and nasal (nose) products will be stored separately from other medications for internal use. 1. During a medication pass observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-07 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure that the dietary staff had sufficient competencies to ensure resident safety and the appropriate diet textures were followed. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated October 2023, indicated the following are reviewed annually and on hire: - Dementia Training - Explanation of Diets On 10/23/23 at 12:19 P.M., Resident #62 was served a tray with large slices of zucchini, approximately 1.5 inches in size, and dry rice. Review of the facility's therapeutic menu for that day indicated Resident #62 should have received steamed rice covered in gravy or sauce and chopped zucchini. Resident #62's meal ticket indicated: cut up food bite size, mechanical soft. During an observation on 10/24/23 at 12:15 P.M. Resident #53 was prescribed a chopped texture with cut-up solids into bite sized pieces. The Resident received pasta not cut-up, broccoli in full pieces and a full piece of bread. During an interview on 10/26/23 at 10:31 A.M., the Food Service Director said that there has been no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-07 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program which addressed the full range of care and services, was comprehensive and data-driven, and focused on indicators of outcomes of quality of life, quality of care, and services to residents in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) ensure an ongoing QAPI program is implemented and maintained and addressed identified priorities and; 2) ensure the governance and leadership members sustain a QAPI program during transitions in leadership and staffing. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled QAPI Plan, last reviewed 2/18/22 included, but was not limited to the following: - (The Company) shall ensure that the Governing Body, Administration, Medical Director, Director of Nursing, clinical and non-clinical staff demonstrate a consistent endeavor to deliver safe, effective, optimal resident care services in an environment of minimal risk. - This facility shall develop, implement, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program which addressed the full range of care and services, was comprehensive and data-driven, and focused on indicators of outcomes of quality of life, quality of care, and services to residents in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to use a systematic approach to determine underlying causes of problems impacting larger systems, develop corrective actions, and monitor effectiveness of its performance improvement activities to ensure improvements are sustained. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled QAPI Plan, last reviewed 2/18/22 included, but was not limited to the following: - (The Company) shall ensure that the Governing Body, Administration, Medical Director, Director of Nursing, clinical and non-clinical staff demonstrate a consistent endeavor to deliver safe, effective, optimal resident care services in an environment of minimal risk. - This facility shall develop, implement, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) ensure a system was in place for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, visitors, and other individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement based upon the facility assessment; 2) ensure staff utilized the appropriate personal protective equipment prior to entering resident rooms requiring transmission-based precautions for one of two residents (#133) with Clostridium difficile (a contagious bacteria that causes severe diarrhea and inflammation of the colon); 3) ensure staff performed hand hygiene after exiting a room identified as being on contact precaution for C.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program to promote and monitor the appropriate use of antibiotics and failed to complete antibiotic usage audit tools (Line Listings), which are used to guide decisions for evaluating antibiotic prescribing patterns in accordance with the Antibiotic Stewardship Program. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled: The Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: - The purpose of an antibiotic stewardship program is to improve the use of antibiotics in healthcare to protect patients and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance. - Antibiotic stewardship refers to a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use. - The CDC recommends that all nursing homes take steps to improve antibiotic prescribing practices and reduce inappropriate use. - Any action…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-07 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, policy and Facility Assessment review, the facility failed to provide the designated hours for an Infection Preventionist to carry out the necessary responsibilities of facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program according to the facility's policy. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Infection Preventionist, revised 10/2022 indicated the following: - The Infection Preventionist is responsible for coordinating the implementation and updating of our established infection prevention and control policies and practices. - The amount of time designated to this role should be established by the Facility Assessment - The Infection Preventionist should be an active member of the facility's QAPI Committee - The Infection Preventionist will collect, analyze, and provide infection and antibiotic usage data and trends to nursing staff and health care practitioners; consult on infection risk assessment and prevention and control practices. Review of the Facility Assessment, updated and reviewed with QAPI Committee October 2023 indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-07 · tag F0941 — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and personnel file review, the facility failed to ensure that 22 of 22 new hires in 2023 were educated on Communication in the facility, as outlined in the Facility Assessment. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment indicated the following: -3.4 Every new hire must meet the minimum education and training requirements to hold and maintain their professional licensures and certifications. All new hires go through general orientation. -The itemized list of education provided at orientation included: Communication. During an interview on 10/26/23 at 9:18 A.M., with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Business Office Manager (BOM), the NHA said that the facility had not had a staff educator since previous ownership. The NHA said that traditionally the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) would do the education, but he does not know if that has started yet at the facility and does not know if any new hires have been oriented, educated, assessed for competencyo, or had dementia training since the current company acquired the facility in January 2023.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-07 · tag F0942 — widespreadEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and personnel file review, the facility failed to ensure that 22 of 22 new hires in 2023 were educated on resident rights, resident bill of rights as well as how to ensure resident safety, as outlined in the Facility Assessment. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment indicated the following: -3.4 Every new hire must meet the minimum education and training requirements to hold and maintain their professional licensures and certifications. All new hires go through general orientation. -The itemized list of education provided at orientation included: resident rights, resident bill of rights as well as how to ensure resident safety. During an interview on 10/26/23 at 9:18 A.M., with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Business Office Manager (BOM), the NHA said that the facility had not had a staff educator since previous owner ship. The NHA said that traditionally the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) would do the education, but he does not know if that has started yet at the facility and does not know if any new hires have been oriented,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-07 · tag F0943 — widespreadGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and personnel file review, the facility failed to ensure that 22 of 22 new staff hires in 2023 were educated on abuse, neglect and exploitation training, as outlined in the Facility Assessment. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment indicated the following: -3.4 Every new hire must meet the minimum education and training requirements to hold and maintain their professional licensures and certifications. All new hires go through general orientation. -The itemized list of education provided at orientation included: Verbal and physical abuse, neglect,, mistreatment, psychological harm and misappropriation of property. During an interview on 10/26/23 at 9:18 A.M., with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Business Office Manager (BOM), the NHA said that the facility had not had a staff educator since previous ownership. The NHA said that traditionally the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) would do the education, but he does not know if that has started yet at the facility and does not know if any new hires have been oriented, educated, assessed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-07 · tag F0944 — widespreadConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and personnel file review, the facility failed to ensure that 22 of 22 new staff hires in 2023 were educated on the QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) process, as outlined in the Facility Assessment. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment indicated the following: -3.4 Every new hire must meet the minimum education and training requirements to hold and maintain their professional licensures and certifications. All new hires go through general orientation. -The itemized list of education provided at orientation included: QAPI process During an interview on 10/26/23 at 9:18 A.M., with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Business Office Manager (BOM), the NHA said that the facility had not had a staff educator since previous ownership. The NHA said that traditionally the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) would do the education, but he does not know if that has started yet at the facility and does not know if any new hires have been oriented, educated, assessed for competency, or had dementia training since the current company…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-07 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — widespreadInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and personnel file review, the facility failed to ensure that 22 of 22 new staff hires in 2023 were educated on Infection Control, as outlined in the Facility Assessment. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment indicated the following: -3.4 Every new hire must meet the minimum education and training requirements to hold and maintain their professional licensures and certifications. All new hires go through general orientation. -The itemized list of education provided at orientation included: infection control policy and procedure, CDC standard precautions, hand hygiene, disease specific isolation, exposure control plan, bloodborne pathogens including transmission; Hepatitis B vaccine; Personal Protective Equipment (PPE); Tuberculosis Policy and Procedure. -New employee orientation also includes general infection prevention information; introduction to the OSHA Exposure Control Plan and its location, TB education, Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) available to all staff and its location. Hepatitis B vaccine availability, post exposure treatment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-07 · tag F0946 — widespreadProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and personnel file review, the facility failed to ensure that 22 of 22 new staff hires in 2023 were educated in Ethics and Compliance, as outlined in the Facility Assessment. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment indicated the following: -3.4 Every new hire must meet the minimum education and training requirements to hold and maintain their professional licensures and certifications. All new hires go through general orientation. -The itemized list of education provided at orientation included: mission statement, quality of care, quality of life. During an interview on 10/26/23 at 9:18 A.M., with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Business Office Manager (BOM), the NHA said that the facility had not had a staff educator since previous ownership. The NHA said that traditionally the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) would do the education, but he does not know if that has started yet at the facility and does not know if any new hires have been oriented, educated, assessed for competency, or had dementia training since the current company…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-07 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespreadProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and personnel file review, the facility failed to ensure that 22 of 22 new staff hires in 2023 were educated on Resident Behaviors, as outlined in the Facility Assessment. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment indicated the following: -3.4 Every new hire must meet the minimum education and training requirements to hold and maintain their professional licensures and certifications. All new hires go through general orientation. -The itemized list of education provided at orientation included: the characteristics of our resident population, behavior policy, and dementia training. Review of the facility policy titled, Behavioral Health Services: dated 10/22, indicated the following: *Staff must promote dignity, autonomy, privacy, socialization, and safety as appropriate for each resident and are trained in ways to support residents in distress. *Staff training regarding behavioral health services includes, but is not limited to: a. Recognizes changes in behavior that indicate psychological distress; b. Implementing care plan interventions that are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to 1) provide a dignified dining experience for the residents on 2 of 3 residents units and 2) failed to maintain a dignified experience by using a privacy bag for a Foley catheter drainage bag for 1 Resident (#24) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Quality of Life- Dignity, dated 10/22, indicated the following: *Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, respect and individuality. *Residents should be treated with dignity and respect at all times. *Staff shall speak respectfully to residents at all times, including addressing the resident by his or her name of choice and not labeling or referring to the resident by his or her room number, diagnosis or care needs. *Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited. Staff shall promote dignity and assist residents as needed by: a. helping the resident to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to 1) investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 Resident (#33) and 2) investigate bruises of unknown origin for 2 Residents (#36 and #49) and 3) have evidence an allegation of abuse for 1 Resident (#26) was thoroughly investigated. out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Abuse, dated, 10/23/22, indicated the following: -The facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents/patients and misappropriation of resident/patient property by anyone including staff, family, friends, etc. The facility prohibits any exploitation of the mentally and physically disabled resident in the facility. The facility has designed and implemented processes, which strive to ensure the prevention and reporting of suspected or alleged resident/patient abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation of property. -All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation,record review and interview the facility failed to develop care plans for three Residents (#48, #35, and #75), out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically, 1. for Resident #48 the facility failed to develop a care plan for the use of psychotropic medications, 2. for Resident #35 the facility failed to develop care plans with person-centered interventions or measurable goals, and 3. the facility failed to develop a dementia care plan with specific interventions for Resident #75. 1. For Resident #48 the facility failed to ensure a person-centered care plan with measurable goals and interventions for the use of psychotropic medication was developed. Resident #48 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 and has diagnoses that include but are not limited to cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, unspecified dementia, and Parkinson's disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated Resident #48 scored 4 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to 1. review the effectiveness of a weight loss supplement and address a significant weight loss in a timely manner for 1 Resident (#73), 2. failed to assess a significant weight loss in a timely manner for 3 Residents (#7, #48, and #63), 3. failed to identify and assess a significant weight gain for 1 Resident (#17), and 4. failed to complete an initial nutrition assessment for 1 Resident (#57), out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Weighing the Resident, dated 01/2023, indicated the following: - Weights will be obtained and record: upon admission, weekly for first four weeks, then either monthly or more frequently if clinical condition warrants or as ordered by the physician - Any unplanned weight loss/gain is to be reported to the physician, family/responsible party, dietitian, nursing supervisor and addressed at the weekly At Risk Meetings. Review of the facility policy titled Weight Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure staffing was sufficient to meet the activities of daily living needs for residents on 1 of 3 resident care units (Highport Unit). Subsequently, 3 Residents (#23, #133, #31) were not provided positioning, bathing, and incontinence care and the opportunity to get out of bed. Findings include: Review of the Highport Resident Census Roster for 10/22/23 indicated 36 residents resided on the unit. Review of the schedule for 10/22/23 indicated three Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) were scheduled for the day shift. During an interview on 10/22/23 at 8:00 A.M., CNA #2 said there are only two CNAs working on the unit right now. On 10/22/23 the following was observed on the Highport Unit between 7:42 A.M., through 9:21 A.M. -At 7:42 A.M, the hallway between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had foul odors detected. -At 7:55 A.M., two male residents were observed in their room. The room had a strong urine odor. One of the residents was sitting on the side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and personnel file review, the facility failed to ensure that 7 of 7 newly hired staff into the Nursing Department in 2023 were assessed for competency, as outlined in the Facility Assessment. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated as reviewed with the QAPI committee, in October 2023, indicated that the Governing Body included, but was not limited to, the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing, the Chief Operating Officer and the Medical Director. The Facility Assessment indicated the following: New Admissions: The admissions director reviews as needed with the Administrator, DON, Medical Director, Regional Nurse Consultant, and Staff Educator to ensure staff competencies and staffing needs can be met. - Every new hire must meet- the minimum education and training requirements to hold and maintain their professional licenses and certifications. All new hires go through general orientation. At orientation, attendees are educated on the following: organizational structure, mission statement, philosophy of care,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent. Two out of three nurses observed made four errors in 47 opportunities on two of three units resulting in a medication error rate of 8.51%. These errors impacted four Residents (#14, #12, #60 and #17), out of 7 residents observed during medication administration pass. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Medication Administration' revised 10/2022, indicated the following but not limited to the following: *Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. *As required or indicated for a medication, the individual administering the medication will record in the resident's medical record this may include EHR (Electronic Health Record) if being utilized: -The date and time the medication was administered -The dosage -Route of administration -Any complaints or symptoms for which the drug was administered -Any results achieved and when those results were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review and interview the facility failed for 1 Resident (#48), out of a total sample of 34 residents, that informed consent for the administration of an antidepressant medication, including the risk/benefits of the medication and potential side effects, was obtained from the resident representative. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, entitled Psychotropic Medication, dated as reviewed 10/2022, indicated the following: *The facility will make every effort to comply with state and federal regulations related to the use of psychopharmacological medication in the long-term care facility to include regular review for continue need, appropriate dosage, side effects, risk and/or benefits. Resident #48 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 and has diagnoses that include but are not limited to cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, unspecified dementia, and Parkinson's Disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #48 scored…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed provide 1 Resident (#33) the right to choose his/her participation in a group activity out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Quality of Life- Dignity, dated 10/22, indicated the following: -Residents shall be assisted in transporting throughout the facility as needed. -Residents shall be assisted in attending activities of their choice, including activities outside the facility. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility in September 2022 with diagnoses including diabetes, feeding difficulties and glaucoma. Review of Resident #33's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of a possible 15 which indicated he/she had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #33 required extensive assistance from staff for mobility throughout the unit and facility. The resident group…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to notify the physician of a resident's return to the facility following an emergency room visit for 1 Resident (#55), who was diagnosed with urinary tract infection and initiation of antibiotics, out of a total sample of 34 residents, resulting in the delay of antibiotic treatment for two days. Findings include: Resident #55 was admitted to the facility in October 2023 with a diagnosis of a hip fracture, frequents falls, and a history of urinary tract infections. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] indicated Resident #55 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero out of a possible fifteen indicating he/she had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated Resident #55 was dependent for toileting and hygiene. On 10/30/23 at 12:10 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #55 sitting in the hallway, across from the nurse's station, waiting for lunch. A catheter tube was observed hanging from his/her left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the grievance book, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to 1) resolve 3 resident grievances and 2) file a grievance for a lost denture for 1 Resident (#75), out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Grievances dated 10/2022, indicated the following: * The facility will assist residents, their representatives, family members or resident advocates in filing a grievance/concern form when concerns are expressed. The facility will investigate and resolve resident grievances timely to ensure residents' safety and protect residents' rights. *The Director of Social Work should be the facilities grievance officer and is responsible for facilitating the complaint/grievance process. *The Grievance Officer coordinates adequate and timely handling of grievances/complaints and ensures the grievances/complaints and resolutions are maintained and reviewed with administration routinely. *The resident and/or resident representative following the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency for one Resident (#33) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Abuse, dated, 10/23/22, indicated the following: *The facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents/patients and misappropriation of resident/patient property by anyone including staff, family, friends, etc. The facility prohibits any exploitation of the mentally and physically disabled resident in the facility. The facility has designed and implemented processes, which strive to ensure the prevention and reporting of suspected or alleged resident/patient abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation of property. *Staff should notify the shift supervisor/charge nurse/manager immediately if suspected abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of property occurs. *Once an allegation of abuse has been made, the supervisor who initially received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to allow 1 Resident (#48) out of 34 sampled residents, to return to the facility following a transfer to the hospital for psychiatric evaluation, failed to document any information to support the basis for discharge despite having been cleared by hospital staff to return, and refused to allow the Resident to return citing that he/she was financially unable to pay for his/her bill. Findings include: Resident #48 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnoses including dementia and Parkinson's Disease. Review of Resident #48's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident scored 4 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated he/she had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #48 required extensive assistance from staff for functional daily tasks. Review of Resident #48's medical record indicated he/she was sent out to the hospital on [DATE] and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and policy review the facility failed to update and revise the plan of care at the time of the comprehensive quarterly review for three Residents (#62, #24 and #7) when their plan of care changed, out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically, 1. for Resident (#62) who has a known history of choking twice at the facility, requiring the Heimlich maneuver, the care plan was not updated to reflect the current level of supervision and assist he/she requires with meals and 2. for Resident #24 the facility failed to revise by not discontinuing a care plan related to urinary incontinence and use of a external urinary collection system, and 3. failed to update and revise the fall care plan for Resident #7 after he/she had a fall resulting in a fracture. Findings include: The facility policy titled Care Plan-Comprehensive, dated as revised 10/22/22, indicated the following: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice during a medication pass. Specifically, 1. during a medication pass a nurse was observed crushing medications without physician orders for one Resident (#60) out of a total 5 residents observed, 2. the facility failed to ensure for two Residents (#50 and #24) that medication were administered timely and 3. the facility failed to adhere to professional standards of care on one of three resident units (Highport Unit), when staff left before the end of their shift and failed to provide report for the oncoming shift. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled 'Medication Administration' date revised 10/2022, indicated the following but not limited to: -Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. On 10/22/23 at 10:54 A.M., Nurse #2 was observed preparing, and administering morning medications to Resident #60, Nurse #2 crushed all the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with physician's orders and wound physician's recommendations for one Resident (#286) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to perform wound care dressing to the left lower extremity hematoma (front of lower leg) as ordered. Findings include: Resident #286 was admitted to the facility in October 2023 with diagnoses including nontraumatic hematoma of soft tissue, repeated falls. Review of Resident #286's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/16/23, indicated Resident #286 scored a 12 out of possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score which indicated moderately impaired cognition. During a observation and interview on 10/22/23 at 8:01 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #286 lying in his/her bed. Resident #286 said (using Google translate) he/she had a wound on his/her leg and proceeded to show the surveyor. The surveyor observed a large open wound to the front of the left lower leg. The wound was not covered,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to prevent the development and promote healing of pressure ulcers for three Residents (#286, #17 and #31) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled 'Pressure Wound Prevention' dated as revised 1/2023, indicated the following but not limited to: -Review the resident's care plan and identify the risk factors as well as the interventions designed to reduce or eliminate those considered modifiable. -When in bed, every attempt should be made to float heels (keep heels off the bed) by placing a pillow from knee to ankle or with other devices as recommended by therapist and prescribed by physician. Review of the facility policy titled 'Supportive surfaces- Air Mattress' date revised October 2022, indicated the following but not limited to: -To assist in the treatment and/or prevention of pressure ulcers as part of a holistic program of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure 1 Resident (#24) out of a total sample of 34 residents was provided the correct Foley catheter (a Foley catheter is a tube that drains urine from the bladder) in accordance with the medical plan of care. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 and has diagnoses that include but are not limited to neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments dated 3/20/23, 6/13/23 and 8/24/23 indicated Resident #24 has an indwelling urinary catheter. Further, the MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #24 was cognitively intact with a score of 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam and was dependent on staff for all care. During an interview and observation 10/22/23 at 8:25 A.M., Resident #24 was observed with a urinary collection bag hanging on the side of his/her bed. Resident #24 said he/she has used a catheter for a long time due to retention. Resident #24 said he/she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to provide respiratory care services in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically the facility failed to 1. follow physician orders for oxygen setting for one Resident (#292), and 2. failed to administer oxygen in accordance with the physician's orders and failed to develop a plan of care for oxygen use for one Resident (#23) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled 'Oxygen Administration' date revised 10/2022 indicated the following but not limited to: -Oxygen is administered by Licensed Nurses with a physician's order in order to provide a resident with sufficient oxygen to their blood and tissues. Orders should specify the oxygen equipment and flow rate or concentration required as routine or PRN (As needed). -Check the physician order. If it is unclear, clarification must be obtained. 1. Resident #292 was admitted to the facility in October 2023 with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#37) was seen by a physician every 90 days out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Physician Visits, dated 10/22, indicated the following: *The Attending Physician will visit residents in a timely fashion, consistent with the applicable state and federal requirements, and dependent on the individual's medical stability, recent and previous medical history, and the presence of medical conditions or problems that cannot be handled readily by phone. *The Attending Physician must visit his/her patients at least once every thirty (30) days for the first ninety (90) days following the resident's admission, and then at least every 60 days thereafter. Resident #37 was admitted to the Facility in September 2022 with diagnoses including heart failure and diabetes. Review of Resident #37's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident scored 15 out of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to provide behavioral psychiatric services for one Resident (#48) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Behavioral Health Services:, dated 10/22, indicated the following: *The facility will provide and residents will receive behavioral health services as needed to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. *Behavioral health services are provided to residents as needed as part of the interdisciplinary, person-centered approach to care. *Residents who exhibit signs of emotional/psychosocial distress receive services and support to address their individual needs and goals for care. *Staff must promote dignity, autonomy, privacy, socialization and safety as appropriate for each resident and are trained in ways to support residents in distress. Review of the facility policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolatedEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff had appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to attain the highest practicable psychosocial well-being for one Resident (#48) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Behavioral Health Services:, dated 10/22, indicated the following: *Staff must promote dignity, autonomy, privacy, socialization and safety as appropriate for each resident and are trained in ways to support residents in distress. *Staff training regarding behavioral health services includes, but is not limited to: a. Recognizes changes in behavior that indicate psychological distress; b. Implementing care plan interventions that are relevant to the resident's diagnosis and appropriate to his or her needs; c. Monitoring care plan interventions and reporting changes in condition; d. Protocols and guidelines related to the treatment of mental disorders, psychosocial adjustment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient and appropriate social services to meet one Resident's (#48) needs out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Resident #48 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnoses including dementia and Parkinson's Disease. Review of Resident #48's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident scored 4 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated he/she had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #48 required extensive assistance from staff for functional daily tasks. During an interview on 10/30/23 at 1:45 P.M., Resident #48's daughter and health care proxy said she does not believe the facility is managing the Resident's care well and she has not been kept up to date with his/her treatment plan, especially in regards to behavioral/psychiatric care. Review of Resident #48's medical record indicated the following nursing notes:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that pharmacy recommendations were reviewed and addressed by the attending physician for one sampled Resident (#297) out of a total of 34 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Pharmacy Consultant Medication Review' date revised 1/2023, indicated the following but not limited to: *The pharmacy consultant reviews each medication regimen of all residents in the facility once per month. *The pharmacy consultant will document his/her findings and recommendations on the monthly drug/regimen review. *The pharmacy consultant should report irregularities to the attending physician, medical director, and director of nursing with the resident's medication regimen. *The unit manager/designee will notify the resident's physician of the pharmacy consultant's recommendations and document in the resident's chart that this is done. Resident #297 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnosis including, anxiety, right femur fracture. Review of Resident #297's Consultant Pharmacist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, policy review and interviews, the facility 1) failed to ensure a diagnosis was in place for the use of antipsychotic medications for one Resident (#48) and 2) failed to complete an Abnormal Involuntary Movement (AIMS) assessment (a test used monitor for adverse consequences of antipsychotic medication) for one Resident (#75) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Antipsychotic Medication Use, dated 10/22 indicated the following: *Antipsychotic medications may be considered for residents with dementia but only after medical, physical, functional, psychological, emotional psychiatric, social and environmental causes of behavior symptoms have been identified and addressed. Antipsychotic medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage for the shortest period of time and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re review. *Residents will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat specific…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that as needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days and the orders were not renewed unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner evaluated the Resident for the appropriateness of that medication for two Residents (#297 and #73) and failed to ensure a psychotropic medication was not continued to be administered after a three day trial for one resident (#48), out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled 'Psychotropic Medication' date revised 10/2022 indicated the following but not limited to: *The facility will make every effort to comply with state and federal regulations related to the use of psychopharmacological medications in the long-term care facility to include regular review for continued need, appropriate dosage, side effects, risks and/or benefits. *The need to continue as needed orders for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days requires that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to provide dental services to replace a missing partial denture for one Resident (#75) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Dentures, dated 10/22, indicated the following: *If dentures are damaged or lost, residents should be referred for dental services within three (7) (sic)days. Documentation will be completed regarding what is being done to ensure the resident is able to eat and drink adequately until seen by dentist. Resident #75 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses including dementia. Review of Resident #75's most recent Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of a possible 15, which indicated he/she had moderate cognitive impairment. During an interview on 10/22/23 at 12:30 P.M., Resident #75 said he/she was missing a bridge (partial denture) for about 2 months.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to keep an accurate medical record for one Resident (#17) out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically, for Resident #17 the facility documented in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) that ordered treatments were provided that were not. Findings include: Resident #17 was admitted to the facility in July 2021 and has diagnoses that included hemiplegia affecting left non-dominant side and DTI (deep tissue injury) to the right distal, lateral foot and the left distal, lateral foot. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/5/23, indicated that on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam Resident #17 scored an 11 out of a possible 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS further indicated Resident #17 required extensive physical assistance for all activities of daily living. Review of the most recent Licensed Nursing Summary, dated 8/31/23 indicated Resident #17 is totally dependent for dressing, grooming and personal hygiene. The Summary indicated that Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2), who upon admission was noted to multiple skin issues including the presence of non-pressure related wounds to his/her bilateral lower extremities, the Facility failed to ensure they developed and implemented a Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan related to his/her actual wounds, that included treatment interventions, measurable goals, and objectives with established timeframes related to the promotion of wound healing and the prevention of wound deterioration. Findings Include: The Facility Policy titled, Care Plan-Comprehensive, dated as revised 10/22/22, indicated a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The Policy indicated the comprehensive, person-centered care plan will include measurable objectives, describe services that are to be furnished to attain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed to be at risk for altered nutritional status which included the potential for weight loss, the Facility failed to ensure Resident #1's nutritional status including body weight was monitored appropriately by nursing and per facility policy, and that meals percentages consumed were adequately monitored by nursing in an effort to help him/her maintain acceptable parameters of nutrition to prevent unplanned/undesired weight loss. Findings Include: The Facility Policy titled Weight Assessment and Interventions, dated as revised 05/2019, indicated: -The multidisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight change for residents. -Nursing staff will measure resident weights within twenty-four hours of admission, weekly for four weeks, and then monthly thereafter. -Monthly weights would be obtained each month or as ordered by the Physician. -Weights would be recorded in the medical record (electronic health record where available) for each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2), who had a history of clostridium difficile (c-diff, an intestinal bacteria that causes diarrhea), the Facility failed to ensure stool sample laboratory results were promptly reported to his/her Health Care Providers (Physician or Physician Assistant). On 05/31/23 Resident #2's laboratory results from his/her stool sample were reported to the Facility via phone by the laboratory, however the results were not reported to his/her Health Care Provider until the following day. Findings Include: The Facility Policy titled Diagnostic Services, dated as revised 01/2023, indicated clinical laboratory and imaging services shall be available twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week for all residents onsite. The Policy indicated results should be called to the ordering Physician in an organized timely manner. Resident #2 was admitted to the Facility in April 2023, diagnoses included heart failure, hypertension, chronic obstructive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0777 — isolatedProvide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who experienced a fall, and for whom they had obtained Physician's Orders on 07/03/22 for a STAT x-ray of his/her left arm, the Facility failed to ensure that he/she was provided with radiology services consistent with his/her Physician's Orders. On 07/03/23 an x-ray was obtained of Resident #1's left hand only and not of his/her left arm. Resident #1 was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department on 07/04/23 for a left arm x-ray and results revealed a left arm fracture and he/she returned to the Facility with his/her left arm in a sling. Findings Include: The Facility Policy titled Diagnostic Services, dated as revised 01/2023, indicated clinical laboratory and radiology services shall be available twenty-four hours a day, seven days per week, for all residents onsite. The Policy indicated all diagnostic testing procedures shall be performed as ordered by a Physician or licensed independent Practitioner. The Policy indicated the results should be called to the ordering Physician in an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2), the Facility failed to ensure they maintained complete and accurate Medical Records when Certified Nurse Aide Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Flow Sheet documentation was not consistently completed for Resident #1 during the Months of June 2023 and July 2023 and for Resident #2 during the month of May 2023. Findings Include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Charting and Documentation, dated as revised 01/2023, indicated all services provided to the resident, or any changes in the resident's medical or mental condition shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The Policy indicated that Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) may make entries in the resident's medical record for all care rendered to residents such as activity of daily living (ADL) care, food and fluid consumption. The Policy indicated CNAs were encouraged to document care as close to the completion of task as possible and if not,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-11-07 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Nursing Staffing data was posted daily in a prominent area and readily accessible to residents and visitors as required. Findings include: During observations made on 10/22/23 and 10/23/23 the surveyor was unable to locate the daily staff posting data, intended to be accessible by residents and visitors. During an interview on 10/22/23 at 11:59 A.M., a family member said they visit the facility multiple times a week and have never seen the daily staffing data information posted. During an interview on 10/23/23 at 5:39 P.M., the facility scheduler said she does the staffing and is responsible for posting the staffing data. The facility scheduler said she has not been posting it recently and could not provide a copy of the required postings.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$322,104 in federal fines across 5 penalties.
- $82,856 — penalty dated 2024-10-10
- $2,279 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
- $1,899 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
- $3,418 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
- $231,652 — penalty dated 2023-11-07
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ADVINIACARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MA HOLDCO OP LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/27/2022 |
| DAVID A BERKOWITZ REVOC TR DAVID BERKOWITZ TTEE | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/27/2022 |
| FREDERICK S FRANKEL TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/27/2022 |
| YOSEF MEYSTEL DECLARATION OF TR OF YOSEF MEYSTEL TTEE | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/27/2022 |
| BERKOWITZ, BENJAMIN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/27/2022 |
| TALAMONA, RAYMOND | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/27/2022 |
| TOMOLONIUS, BARBARA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/27/2022 |
| MA5 POINTE MANAGER LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/10/2025 |
| POINTE GROUP CARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/10/2025 |
| POINTE PROPERTY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/27/2022 |
| CYNEWSKI, STEPHEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/27/2022 |
| JOSEPH, JOE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/27/2022 |
| LABELLA, CATERINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/27/2022 |
| SPECTOR, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/27/2022 |
| TUROFSKY, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/27/2022 |
| WILHELM, NAFTALI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/27/2022 |
| BERKOWITZ, DAVID | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/10/2025 |
| 180 LOW ST LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/10/2025 |
| CURIS SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/27/2022 |
| DAVID A BERKOWITZ DELTA TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/27/2022 |
| YOSEF MEYSTEL DELTA TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/27/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225332. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.