Salem Rehab Center
7 Loring Hills Avenue, Salem, MA 01970 · For profit - Corporation · 123 certified beds · (978) 741-5700 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 7 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (83) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $238,905 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-12)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- about 30% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.2% | 16.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.4% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.7% | 15.5% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.8% | 15.4% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.6% | 19.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.8% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.3% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.9% | 21.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 28.8% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 5.7% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 36.4% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.1% | 11.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.01 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.52 | 1.50 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 120 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 47% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.0%CMS range 43.4–60.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 8.0–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 11.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 3.8–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.83 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 67.8 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 55 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
83 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 65 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
5.) Resident #3 was admitted to the facility September 2023 with diagnoses including a stroke, acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) (weakness and sensory loss in limbs), and anemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/4/24, indicated Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of a possible 15 which indicated she is not cognitively impaired and requires total assist with all activities of daily living. Review of nursing skin evaluation, dated 7/6/24, indicated Resident #3 had no skin issues. Review of consultant wound physician notes, dated 7/9/24, indicated initial evaluation of Resident #3's right lateral ankle wound, documented duration of wound as greater than 50 days. The consultant wound physician classified the wound as non-pressure caused by trauma/injury and made dressing treatment recommendations for xeroform gauze daily, covered by abdominal pad, kerlix gauze roll and tape. Review of Medication Administration Record (MAR), Treatment Administration Record (TAR), and physician orders failed to include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-08-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
4.) Resident #3 was admitted to the facility September 2023 with diagnoses including a stroke, acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) (weakness and sensory loss in limbs), and anemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/4/24, indicated Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of a possible 15 which indicated she is not cognitively impaired and requires total assist with all activities of daily living. Review of nursing skin evaluation, dated 7/6/24, indicated Resident #3 had no skin issues. Review of consultant wound physician notes, dated 7/9/24, indicated initial evaluation of Resident #3's right lateral ankle wound, documented duration of wound as greater than 50 days. The consultant wound physician classified the wound as non-pressure caused by trauma/injury and made dressing treatment recommendations for xeroform gauze daily, covered by abdominal pad, kerlix gauze roll and tape. Review of Medication Administration Record (MAR), Treatment Administration Record (TAR), and physician orders failed to include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-08-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
4. Resident #103 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses that include diabetes, pressure ulcer of the right buttock (stage IV) and bacteremia. Review of Resident #103's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 6/21/24, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of a possible 15, indicating that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated that the Resident had one stage IV pressure ulcer that was present on admission to the facility and was at risk for the development of pressure ulcers. Review of Resident #103's most recent Norton Assessment (a tool designed to help clinicians evaluate a patient's risk of developing pressure injuries), dated 6/15/24, indicated a score of 9, placing Resident #103 at high risk for the development of pressure injuries. During an observation and interview on 7/23/24 at 8:28 A.M., Resident #103 was observed laying on his/her back in bed. Resident #103 said that he/she has a pressure injury that they had when they were admitted to the facility on their sacrum. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-08-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and observation the facility failed to ensure seven residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status out of a total sample of 39 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) For Resident #85 the facility failed to assess the nutritional status of and implement pertinent interventions for the Resident who developed a necrotic skin area which worsened to two unstageable wounds and experienced significant weight loss. 2) For Resident #68 the facility failed to address a significant weight loss in a timely manner. 3) For Resident #16 the facility failed to obtain weights as ordered, and address a significant weight loss for in a timely manner. 4) For Resident #24 the facility failed to implement a therapeutic diet as ordered by the physician, failed to identify, and address a potential significant weight loss, and failed to implement recommendations by the Dietitian. 5) For Resident #42, the facility failed to implement dietitian recommendations for prosource…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-08-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, staff education and Facility Assessment review, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff were trained and demonstrated the competencies and skill sets necessary to provide the level and types of care and services needed as outlined in the Facility Assessment. Specifically: 1.) The facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff were trained and demonstrated competency related to wound care, treatment administration, transcribing orders, pressure ulcer prevention, change in condition, and communication. For Resident #85, the facility failed to implement treatments and physician orders recommended by the consulting wound physician resulting in a new necrotic skin condition progressing to an unstageable wound leading to osteomyelitis (a bone infection) and sepsis (a life-threatening response to infection) requiring hospitalization and need for a fecal-diverting colostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the abdomen, called a stoma, that allows digested…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-08-12 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner that enabled the facility to use its resources effectively to attain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically: 1.) The facility failed to provide nursing staff education and training to provide competent, safe, and effective wound care management. As a result the facility failed to notify the physician, implement treatments recommended by the consulting wound physician, assess the nutritional status and implement pertinent nutrition interventions for a Resident (#85) resulting in a new necrotic skin condition progressing to an unstageable wound leading to osteomyelitis (a bone infection), significant weight loss, and sepsis (a life-threatening response to infection) requiring hospitalization and need for a fecal-diverting colostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the abdomen, called a stoma, that allows digested food to pass out of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-08-12 · tag F0837 — patternEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and the Facility Assessment, the facility failed to ensure the Governing Body provided oversight and accountability for effective operational management and quality of care related to the clinical status of residents. Specifically: 1.) The governing body failed to ensure the facility provided consistent and effective nursing staff education and training to provide competent quality of care and effective wound care management, as per the Facility Assessment. 2.) The governing body failed to allocate resources and obtain a Dietitian for the facility, as per the Facility Assessment. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Governing Body, dated as initiated 11/2017, indicated to ensure that the facility has an active (engaged and involved) governing body that is responsible for establishing and implementing policies regarding the management of the facility. Governing Body Members include: Regional VP (vice president) of Operations, Administrator, Assistant Administrator (if applicable), Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2024-08-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences was provided for two Residents out of a total sample of 39 residents. Specifically: 1) For Resident #85, the facility failed to utilize as-needed (PRN) pain medication for breakthrough pain and wound dressing changes as directed by the physician. 2) For Resident #75, the facility failed to ensure nursing provided pain management in accordance with professional standards of practices. Specifically for Resident #75 the facility failed consistently administer his/her physician's ordered pain medication on time. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Pain Management, revised in October 2022, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: - The facility is committed to reducing physical and psychosocial symptoms associated with pain to assist the resident in achieving their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to follow proper thawing practices when defrosting clams, to ensure that food was dated in the main kitchen and in one of two unit kitchenette refrigerators. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Food from Outside - Safety, revised January 2023, indicated, but was not limited to, the following:It is the policy of this facility to provide safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption of all food including food and fluids brought to resident by family and other visitors. Facility staff will be appointed to check resident refrigerators for proper temperatures, food containment and quality, and disposal of items per facility policy.Foods requiring refrigeration will be received by the facility designee (activity department, food and nutrition department, charge nurse, etc.) for proper and immediate storage including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#15) was not left with pills to self-administer without first determining if it was safe, out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, staff left pills at Resident #15's bedside for self-administration without completing a self-administration of medication assessment.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Self-Administration of Medications, revised January 2023, indicated:-The resident may request to keep medication at bedside for self-administration in accordance with Resident Rights. Criteria must be met to determine if a resident is both mentally and physically capable of self-administering medication and to keep accurate documentation of these actions.-The staff and practitioner will assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is clinically appropriate for the resident upon request. -In addition to a general evaluation of decision-making capacity, the nurse will perform a more specific skill…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was revised by the interdisciplinary team for one Resident (#71) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #71, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan relating to the need for a geri chair (a sturdy, padded chair on wheels that can recline which is designed to be more supportive and comfortable than a standard wheelchair, especially for people who have limited mobility and spend a lot of time sitting) for comfort and skin integrity concerns upon the care plan review following the completion of the last quarterly assessment.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, revised January 2023, indicated:-PROCEDURE: Interdisciplinary team conferences shall be held for each resident at 90-day intervals and more often if needed. The Interdisciplinary team shall: Revise the plan of care, treatment, and services. Care plans shall be updated at the time of the conference or on the shift immediately following the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff accommodated food preferences for one Resident (#66), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to honor Resident #66's preferences and served the Resident fortified cream of wheat, which he/she disliked, instead of fortified super oatmeal as he/she requested.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Meal Rounds/Visits, revised January 2023, indicated:-POLICY: To determine resident's likes/dislikes and overall acceptance of meal service.Resident #66 was admitted to the facility in August 2021 with diagnoses including moderate protein calorie malnutrition.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/5/25, indicated Resident #66 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 out of 15. Review of Resident #66's dietary progress note, dated 9/2/25, indicated:-Honor food preferences. On 9/3/25 at 8:34 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #66 with a bowl of fortified cream…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food is stored, prepared and distributed in accordance with professional standards in food safety and sanitation to prevent the spread of pathogens, which could result in foodborne illness for the residents. Specifically, 1. food stored in the dry storage area, and walk-in refrigerator were not labeled and dated, and 2. Staff failed to ensure safe food handling during the lunch meal distribution. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage, not dated indicated Food should be stored and prepared in a clean safe sanitary manner that complies with state and federal guidelines. Purpose: to minimize contamination and bacteria. Review of the facility policy titled, Handling, Serving, and Transporting Foods, not dated indicated: Foods should be handled, served and transported at the proper holding temperatures. Food should be presented attractively, under sanitary conditions, and according to the facility menu. Purpose: to prepare, present, and serve plates safely and attractively.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure three Residents (#39, #25 and #38) received care in accordance with professional standards of practice, out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #39, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was developed for the use of a hand orthotic before it was in use. 2. For Resident #25, the facility failed to ensure a wound physician recommendation was implemented. 3. For Resident #38, the facility failed to implement physician's orders for daily dressing changes to the left elbow. Findings include: 1. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses including encephalopathy and Parkinson's Disease. Review of Resident #39's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. During an observation on 4/15/25 at 8:40 A.M., Resident #39 was awake in bed eating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that for two Residents (#10 and #1) who are unable to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services to maintain good grooming, and personal and oral hygiene out of a total sample of 23 Residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #10, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided timely and in accordance with the standards of care and the Resident care plan. 2. For Resident #1, the facility failed to remove unwanted facial hair. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled, ADL (Activities of Daily Living-Personal Hygiene) Last Date Revised 10/2022 included but was not limited to the following: Policy: The purpose of this procedure is to direct the Nursing Staff and meet Residents individual needs per the plan of care and Kardex on a daily basis. Facial hair will be groomed as needed Toileting/incontinence care for a Resident will be provided as needed for each individual Resident per care plan and Kardex. 1. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#37), out of a total sample of 23 resident, interventions related to fall, and injury prevention were implemented in accordance with the medical plan of care. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure bedside fall mats were in place. Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Fall Preventions and Management, last date revised 1/2023 indicated The Fall Risk Evaluation will determine risk factors. The interdisciplinary team identifies and implements appropriate interventions to reduce the risk of falls or injuries while maximizing dignity and independence. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 and has diagnoses that include but are not limited to atherosclerotic heart disease, unspecified fracture of right pubis, repeated falls, low back pain and depression. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 1/27/25 indicated Resident #37 scored a 10 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam indicating he/she as having moderately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure enteral nutrition provided via a gastrostomy tube (a tube surgically inserted through the abdominal wall directly into the stomach with the purpose of delivering food, typically in the form of liquid formula) was provided according to professional standards for one Resident (#36) out of a total sample of 23 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a tube feeding was running according to physician orders for Resident #36. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Enteral Feedings, dated and revised January 2022, indicated the following: - Continuous Feeding: Enteral feeding delivered around the clock, Feedings are only stopped for medication administration and routine tube flushes. This type of feeding may or may not use an electronic pump; but typically, a pump is used. -Procedure: 1. Verify physician order 2. Document all assessments, findings and interventions in the medical record. Resident #36 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided for two Residents (#26 and #42), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #26, the facility failed to administer oxygen appropriately and change oxygen tubing as ordered. 2. For Resident #42, the facility failed to ensure continuous oxygen was provided when the Resident left the facility. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled 'Oxygen Therapy', dated 10/2022, indicated the following but not limited to: -The administration of supplemental oxygen is an essential element of appropriate management for a wide range of clinical conditions. However, oxygen should be regarded as a drug and therefore requires prescribing in all but emergency situations. -Failure to administer oxygen appropriately can result in serious harm to the patient. The safe implementation of oxygen therapy with appropriate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 65 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental, and psychosocial well-being for one Resident (#70) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure recommendations from behavioral health services were relayed to the physician and implemented for Resident #70. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Change in Condition, dated as revised 10/2022, indicated the following: -Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending physician, and representative of changes in the resident's medical, mental condition and/or status. Resident #70 was admitted to the facility in May 2024 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, post traumatic dress disorder and visual hallucinations. Review of Resident 70's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/10/24, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, indicating that the Resident is cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a current hospice care plan was present in the medical record and coordinated with facility staff for one Resident (#71) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Hospice Services', last revised January 2023, indicated the following but not limited to: -When a resident participates in the hospice program, a coordinated plan of care between the facility, hospice agency and resident/family will be developed and shall include directives for managing pain and other uncomfortable symptoms. -The hospice agency retains overall professional management responsibility for directing the implementation of the plan of care related to the terminal illness and related conditions, which include: -The facility and hospice will identify the specific services that will be provided by each entity, and this information will be communicated in the plan of care. Based on record review and interviews, the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-12 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to employ a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional either full-time, part-time, or on a consultant basis. Findings include: Review of the Dietitian job description indicated, but was not limited to, the following: Position summary: -Provides consultation concerning nutritional services to the Administrator of the facility and works in advisory capacity to the Food Service Director in accordance with current generally accepted professional practices. - Provides consultation to allied staff, consultants and physicians regarding diet, nutritional problems and management, including patient visitation, nutritional assessment, patient nutritional care plans, and diet reviews. - Updates nutritional care plans on a timely basis. - Will review diets and nutritional status on residents' chart and make recommendation to the physician for changes as necessary. - Will visit each nurse's station weekly and check with the charge nurse and/or the dietary communication book for any comments and/or dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-12 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Facility Assessment, employee education record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff. Specifically, the facility failed to provide the required training necessary to meet the needs of each resident. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 5/24/24, indicated, but was not limited to: -3.4 Every new hire must meet the minimum education and training requirements to hold and maintain their professional licensures and certifications. All new hires go through general orientation. At orientation, attendees are educated on the following: organizational structure, mission statement, philosophy of care, the characteristics of our resident population, federal and state regulations, OBRA, quality of care, quality of life, resident rights, resident bill of rights, facility practices, behavior policy, Joint Commission, QAPI process, OSHA, chemicals hazard, the Right to Know, all emergency codes; location of policies and procedures, disaster and evacuation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-12 · tag F0941 — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Facility Assessment, employee education record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement mandatory effective communication training for 17 direct care staff. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 5/24/24, indicated: 3.4 Every new hire must meet the minimum education and training requirements to hold and maintain their professional licensures and certifications. All new hires go through general orientation. -The itemized list of education provided at orientation included: Communication. The surveyor requested staff education files with all training and competencies for 17 direct care staff (5 Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) and 12 Licensed Nurses) on 7/30/24 at 9:07 A.M., 7/30/24 at 12:20 P.M., 7/31/24 at 8:07 A.M., 7/31/24 at 12:32 P.M., and 8/1/24 at 7:47 A.M. Review of 17 employee education files indicated the following training/competencies completed as applicable on hire, annually, or as needed: - 0 out of 17 had documentation they had completed any effective communications training. During an interview on 8/1/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-12 · tag F0942 — widespreadEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Facility Assessment, employee education record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that staff members were educated on the rights of the resident on hire for 14 out of 17 direct care staff education files reviewed. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment indicated the following: 3.4 Every new hire must meet the minimum education and training requirements to hold and maintain their professional licensures and certifications. All new hires go through general orientation. -The itemized list of education provided at orientation included: Resident Rights. The surveyor requested staff education files with all training and competencies for 17 direct care staff (5 Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) and 12 Licensed Nurses) on 7/30/24 at 9:07 A.M., 7/30/24 at 12:20 P.M., 7/31/24 at 8:07 A.M., 7/31/24 at 12:32 P.M., and 8/1/24 at 7:47 A.M. Review of 17 employee education files indicated the following training/competencies completed as applicable on hire, annually, or as needed: - 3 out of 17 had documentation they had completed resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-12 · tag F0944 — widespreadConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Facility Assessment, employee education record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to implement mandatory training on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) for 17 employees. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 5/24/24, indicated: 3.4 Every new hire must meet the minimum education and training requirements to hold and maintain their professional licensures and certifications. All new hires go through general orientation. -The itemized list of education provided at orientation included: QAPI Process. Review of the facility policy titled QAPI Plan, dated reviewed 2/7/21, indicated: - Mandatory training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of the facility's Performance Improvement program shall be provided at the time of hire and as needed. The surveyor requested staff education files with all training and competencies for 17 direct care staff (5 Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) and 12 Licensed Nurses) on 7/30/24 at 9:07 A.M., 7/30/24 at 12:20 P.M., 7/31/24 at 8:07 A.M., 7/31/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-12 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — widespreadInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Facility Assessment, employee education record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement mandatory infection control training upon hire for 15 out of 17 direct care staff. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 5/24/24, indicated: 3.4 Every new hire must meet the minimum education and training requirements to hold and maintain their professional licensures and certifications. All new hires go through general orientation. -The itemized list of education provided at orientation included: Infection control policy and procedure. -Competencies by department: Licensed Nurse: On hire and PRN (as needed): Infection Control Program. The surveyor requested staff education files with all training and competencies for 17 direct care staff (5 Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) and 12 Licensed Nurses) on 07/30/24 at 9:07 A.M., 7/30/24 at 12:20 P.M., 7/31/24 at 8:07 A.M., 7/31/24 at 12:32 P.M., and 8/1/24 at 7:47 A.M. Review of 17 direct care staff education files (5 Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) and 12 Licensed Nurses indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-12 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure at least 12 hours of required in-service training hours, that included dementia management training, were provided for 5 of 5 Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) education files reviewed. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 5/24/24, indicated: 3.4 Every new hire must meet the minimum education and training requirements to hold and maintain their professional licensures and certifications. All new hires go through general orientation. -The itemized list of education provided at orientation included: Annual In-service Education requirements, Dementia Training. - All departments receive an initial 8 hours of dementia training and 4 hours annually. The surveyor requested staff education files with all training and competencies for 5 Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) on 07/30/24 at 9:07 A.M., 7/30/24 at 12:20 P.M., 7/31/24 at 8:07 A.M., 7/31/24 at 12:32 P.M., and 8/1/24 at 7:47 A.M. Review of 5 Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) employee education files indicated: - 0 out of 5 had documentation they had completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-12 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespreadProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Facility Assessment, employee education record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide behavioral health training consistent with the requirements at §483.40 to 17 out of 17 direct care employees reviewed. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment Tool, dated 5/24/24, included but was not limited to the following: - Commonly admitted diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities, or combinations of conditions that require complex medical care and management: Psychiatric/Mood Disorders: Psychosis, Mental Disorder, Depression, Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Behavior that Needs Intervention. - Resources Necessary for Psychiatric/Mood Disorders: Behavior Rounds, Behavior Monitoring in those residents exhibiting behaviors, Multidisciplinary care planning for individualized behavior management for residents exhibiting behaviors - Services and Care we offer based on our Resident's needs: Mental health and behavior: Manage the medical conditions and medication-related issues…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a dignified existence to residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that staff did not refer to residents who require assistance as feeds or feeders, that staff did not speak in a foreign language to each other in the presence of residents, that staff did not stand while providing feeding assistance to residents, that staff did not transport a resident while he/she was facing backwards, and that a foley catheter drainage container was covered and wasn't visible from the hallway. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, titled Quality of Life - Dignity, created in October 2022, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: - Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect and individuality. - Residents shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times. - Treated with dignity means the resident will be assisted in maintaining and enhancing his or her self-esteem and self-worth. - Residents shall be assisted in transporting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Resident Council Meeting minute review, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances addressed by the Resident Council Group had sufficient follow-up to prevent recurrence and provide residents with rationale for actions taken by the facility to resolve grievances. Findings include: Review of the facility's polity titled Resident Council, revised 1/2023, indicated: - Concerns that are raised at the meeting must be recorded in minutes and followed with a concern/response form filled out by the designated staff representative, and addressed to the corresponding Department Head to provide a resolution. All supporting documentation (i.e. in-services, staff education, clinical notes) must be attached. Concern/response forms must be completed within 7-days of being issued. During the Resident Group interview on 7/25/24 at 1:01 P.M., nine residents were in attendance and reported the following concerns: - 8 out of 9 residents reported staff are still on their phones and using ear buds when they should be providing care. - 6 out of 9 residents reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow residents privacy when opening packages. Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled Quality of Life - Dignity, dated 10/2022, indicated: - Staff shall promote, maintain, and protect resident privacy. During the Resident Group interview on 7/25/24 at 1:01 P.M., 4 out of 9 residents in attendance said they had a concern with not being allowed to open packages without supervision or having mail or packages delivered already opened. During an interview on 7/26/24 at 10:55 A.M., the Activities Assistant said the activities department is responsible for delivering packages to residents. The Activities Assistant said residents are not allowed to open packages without supervision because she needs to make sure they aren't ordering things they shouldn't have. During an interview on 7/26/24 at 11:10 A.M., the Activities Director said residents are not allowed to open packages without supervision because she had been told by administration that they need to check for contraband because of a past incident of a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident protected health information (PHI) was secure and not visible to others on three of three nursing units. Findings include: On 7/23/24 at 6:45 A.M., the surveyor observed on the [NAME] Unit medication cart A, a computer screen with an electronic health record that was open, and the surveyor was able to read PHI. On 7/23/24 at 6:47 A.M., Nurse #2 returned to the medication cart, and she said the electronic health record should have been locked. On 7/24/24 at 7:56 A.M., surveyor observed the on the [NAME] Unit medication cart A, a computer screen with an electronic health record that was open to a resident's PHI. There was no nurse in sight. During this observation a food service employee delivered the food truck to the unit and walked past the open screen, a Certified Nursing Assistant, and a laboratory vendor walked by the computer screen potentially exposing PHI. On 7/24/24 at 7:58 A.M., Nurse #5 returned to the medication cart, and she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to develop and implement a person- centered comprehensive care plan for three Residents (#76 #106 and #92) out of a total sample of 39 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #76, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for a behavior of wandering. 2. For Resident #106, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for obstructive sleep apnea and the use of a continuous positive air pressure (CPAP) machine. 3. For Resident #92 the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for obstructive sleep apnea and the use of a continuous positive air pressure (CPAP) machine. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Care Plan- Comprehensive, dated as revised 10/22/22, indicated the following: Policy: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Procedure: 6. The comprehensive, person- centered care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, for three Residents (#51, #76, and #85) out of a total sample of 29 residents the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Specifically, 1. For Resident #51, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain good nutrition (assistance with meals as per the plan of care). 2. For Resident #76, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain nail grooming. Findings include: Review of the policy, ADL Support, dated as revised 6/2022, indicated that Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. 2. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
5. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses including asthma, obstructive sleep apnea, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/18/24, indicated that Resident #13 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 and he/she required oxygen. On 7/23/24 at 8:06 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #13 in his/her bed, he/she was wearing oxygen at 8 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal canula. Resident #13 said he/she does not adjust his/her own oxygen settings. On 7/23/24 at 9:54 A.M., 7/24/24 at 3:05 A.M., 7/24/24 at 7:24 A.M., 7/24/24 at 8:57 A.M., 7/24/24 at 10:03 A.M., 7/25/24 at 6:40 A.M., 7/25/24 at 8:34 A.M., 7/25/24 at 12:49 P.M., 7/25/24 at 4:01 P.M., 7/26/24 at 6:52 A.M., 7/26/24 at 12:11 P.M., and on 7/29/24 at 6:55 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #13 wearing oxygen at 8 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal canula. Review of Resident #13's plan of care related to respiratory,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure services consistent with professional standards were provided for two Residents (#22 and #65) who required dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the body when the kidneys stop working properly), out of total sample of 39 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow physician's orders to ensure that blood pressure readings were not taken on the arm where the dialysis shunt (an access point from the dialysis machine to a blood artery) is located. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Dialysis Management, dated as revised 10/2022, indicated the following: -Policy: Residents receiving hemodialysis treatments will be assessed and monitored to ensure quality of life and well-being. -Procedure: 2. The nurse will obtain orders for monitoring of site, and interventions as appropriate. Orders to include: no blood work or blood pressure in arm with shunt. 1. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility in September 2022 with diagnoses that include type 2 diabetes, chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0699 — patternProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a plan of care was developed for Trauma-Informed Care for four Residents (#13, #83, and #35), who were admitted with the diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) out of a total sample of 42 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #13, who was assessed by nursing as a trauma survivor, the facility failed to develop a plan of care accounting for Resident's experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the Resident. 2. For Resident #83 the facility failed to develop a plan of care for trauma-informed care related to a diagnosis of PTSD. 3. For Resident #35 the facility failed to develop a plan of care for trauma-informed care related to a diagnosis of PTSD. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Trauma Informed Care, dated as revised [DATE], indicated the following: -It is the policy of the facility to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — patternEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personnel file review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 5 Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA's) reviewed were not employed as CNA's for more than four months after hire without having completed the competency evaluation program approved by the State of Massachusetts. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Nurse Aide Registry information for employers indicated the following: - You can employ a Nurse Aide who has not yet taken and passed the CNA test for no more than 4 months. 1.) Review of CNA #9's personnel file indicated she was hired on [DATE] for the position of CNA. CNA #9's personnel file also indicated she had a certificate of completion from a state approved nurse aid training program, dated [DATE]. Review of the Massachusetts Nurse Aide Registry indicate that CNA #9 was not issued Nurse Aide Certification until [DATE], which is 23 months and 6 days after completing the nurse aid training program. Review of CNA #9's Time Card Report, dated [DATE] to [DATE], indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review and interview, the facility failed to ensure annual performance reviews were completed at least every 12 months for 2 of 3 Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) personnel files reviewed. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 5/24/24, indicated: 3.4 Every new hire must meet the minimum education and training requirements to hold and maintain their professional licensures and certifications. All new hires go through general orientation. -The itemized list of education provided at orientation included: Annual In-service Education requirements, Dementia Training. - All departments receive an initial 8 hours of dementia training and 4 hours annually. The surveyor requested personnel files for 3 Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) who were employed by the facility for over 12 months on 7/30/24 at 9:07 A.M., 7/30/24 at 12:20 P.M., 7/31/24 at 8:07 A.M., 7/31/24 at 12:32 P.M., and 8/1/24 at 7:47 A.M. Review of 3 Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) personnel files, who had been employed by the facility for over 12 months, indicated: - 2 out of 3 failed to include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure recommendations from the Monthly Medication Review conducted by the consultant pharmacist were addressed and acknowledged by the physician in a timely manner for five Residents (#13, #41, #50, #92, #35) out of a total sample of 39 residents. 1.) For Resident #13, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician and nursing reviewed and acted on the monthly pharmacy recomendations for ativan (an antianxiety medication) re-evaluation. 2.) For Resident #41, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician and nursing reviewed and acted on the monthly pharmacy recomendations to indicate duration of an as needed clonazepam (an antianxiety medication). 3.) For Resident #50, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician and nursing reviewed and acted on the monthly pharmacy recomendations for ativan re-evaluation. 4.) For Resident #92, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician and nursing reviewed and acted on the monthly pharmacy recomendations to clarify the administration times of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure that PRN [as needed] ordered psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days for four Residents (#13, #50, #41, #92) out of a total sample of 42 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #13, the facility failed to implement a 14 day stop date for PRN ativan (an antianxiety medication). 2. For Resident #41, the facility failed to implement a stop date or re-evaluation for use of PRN clonazepam (an antianxiety medication). 3. For Resident #50, the facility failed to implement a stop date or re-evaluation for use of PRN ativan (an antianxiety medication). 4. For Resident #92, the facility failed to implement a stop date or re-evaluation for use of PRN Klonopin (an antianxiety medication) and PRN Ambien (a hypnotic medication). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Psychotropic Medications, dated as revised 10/2022, indicated the following: -Psychotropic drugs- any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. These drugs include but are not limited to drugs in the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5% when 4 out of 5 nurses observed made 9 errors out of 30 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 30%. Those errors impacted four Residents (#75, #86, #20 and #80), out of five residents observed. 1. For Resident #75, Nurse #1 failed to administer his/her medications within the one-hour time frame. 2. For Resident #86, Nurse #2 failed to administer his/her medications within the one-hour time frame and failed to administer the correct form of iron. 3. For Resident #20, Nurse #3 failed to administer his/her medications within the one-hour time frame. 4. For Resident #80, Nurse #4 failed to administer his/her medications within the one-hour time frame and failed to follow manufactures guidelines. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration, dated as revised 10/2022, indicated the following: 3. Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews for one Resident (#24) out of 39 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure that the Resident was free from a significant medication error. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a blood pressure medication (midodrine) was scheduled to be administered in accordance with the physician's order which indicated that the medication be administered before meals. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Medication Administration, dated as revised 10/2022, indicated the following: 3. Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, quadriplegia, and hypertension. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/21/24, indicated that Resident #24 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. Review of Resident #24's hospital after visit summary, dated 5/3/24, indicated: - midodrine 5 milligrams (mg), take one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure staff stored drugs and biologicals in accordance with State and Federal laws. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1.) Ensure medications with shortened expiration dates were dated once opened. 2.) Ensure medication and treatment carts were locked when unattended. 3.) Ensure medications were stored in the original, labeled containers. 4.) Ensure medications were stored in a locked cabinet, cart, or medication room that is accessible only to authorized personnel. 5). For Resident #38, the facility failed to ensure that self-administered medications were stored securely when not in use. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Medication Storage, dated as revised 10/2022, indicated to provide guidelines for proper storage of medications within the facility. This center will have Medications stored in a manner that maintains the integrity of the product, ensures the safety of the residents, and is in accordance with department…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Findings include: Review of the resident council meeting minutes, dated 4/30/24, indicated that food and coffee was being served to residents cold. Review of the resident council meeting minutes, dated 5/28/24, indicated that food was always cold, and sometimes the coffee was as well. Further review of the resident council minutes indicated that most sandwiches were either soggy, or hard and old. Review of the resident council meeting minutes, dated 6/25/24, indicated that the sandwiches were wet, and that food was still arriving cold. Further review of the resident council minutes indicated that breads are often burnt or undercooked, and that the residents requested real eggs because the liquid eggs taste bad; a lot of complaints of stale breads/sandwiches or burnt/overcooked breads. During initial screening on 7/23/24 residents made the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, policy review, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#24) out of a total sample of 39 residents, was provided the therapeutic diet in accordance with physician orders. Specifically, Resident #24 was not provided with his/her diet as ordered by the physician. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Meal Tray Identification, dated as revised 1/2023, indicated that there will be a means of identifying resident meals and trays for therapeutic requirements and resident preferences. 1. Nursing conveys the following admission information to Dining Services. - Diet order. 2. Food service Manager or designee enters above information into Resident Meal program. 4. Resident food preferences are obtained and entered into Resident Meal Program. 5. Tickets are used to identify correct items for resident diet. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, quadriplegia, dyspepsia, and protein malnutrition. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0810 — patternProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY ready for final edit- please delete once done Based on observations, record review, policy review, and interviews, for one Resident (#51) of 39 sampled residents, the facility failed to provide adaptive equipment. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #51 was consistently provided with a lip plate and sippy cups for use during his/her meals to maximize food intake. Findings include: Review of the policy, Adaptive Equipment, dated as created 10/2022, indicated in order to protect the safety and well-being of residents, and to promote quality care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to enhance the residents dining experience. To ensure all dietetic equipment/ utensils are used appropriately and are well maintained. - Using the Dietary change form, the Dietary Department is informed of any new recommendation from the Speech Pathologist or Occupational Therapy. Dietary: 1. Ensures the device is on the resident's tray at every meal. Nursing: 1. Ensure staff are aware that residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled, that employees did not store their drinks with resident food/ingredients, that staff discarded produce with visible signs of decomposition, that staff discarded dairy products that were past their expiration date, and that food was not stored on the floor. Findings include: Review of the current FDA (Food and Drug Administration) food code indicated the following: - food shall be protected from contamination by storing the food: 1) In a clean, dry location; 2) Where it is not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination; and 3) At least 15 cm (6 inches) above the floor. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Food Storage (Dry, Refrigerated, and Frozen), indicated, but was not limited to, the following: - All food items will be labeled. The label must include the name of the food and the date by which it should be sold, consumed, or discarded. -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, policy review, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented in accordance with professional standard of practice for three Residents (#88, #263, and #35) out of 39 total sampled residents. The facility also failed to maintain complete medical records in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three sampled discharge records. Specifically: 1.) For Resident #88, nursing documented a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) dressing change as implemented, when it was not. 2.) For Resident #263, nursing documented a PICC dressing change as implemented, when it was not. 3.) For Resident #35, nursing did not complete skin checks in the electronic health record when it was signed off on Treatment Administration Record (TAR) as complete. 4.) For Resident #110 the facility failed to obtain orders for Registered Nurse (RN) pronouncement and release of body following the resident's death and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to implement the infection prevention and control program. Specifically: 1.) The facility failed to ensure precaution gowns were appropriately implemented during wound care for residents on enhanced barrier precautions. 2.) The facility failed to ensure staff performed appropriate hand hygiene after removing gloves during wound care. 3.) The facility failed to ensure nursing implemented infection control standards for blood glucose cleaning. Findings include: 1.) The facility failed to ensure precaution gowns and gloves were appropriately implemented during wound care for residents on enhanced barrier precautions. Review of the facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 4/1/2024, indicated: - EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) requires wearing disposable gloves and an isolation gown prior to high contact activity. - High contact resident care activities include: wound care: any skin opening requiring a dressing. On 7/30/24 at 8:01 A.M., the surveyor observed the Wound Physician and the Unit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — patternHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure its staff implemented the facility smoking policy for one Resident (#44) out of a total of 39 residents sampled. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff stored Resident #44's smoking materials in a locked area. Findings include: Review of the facility document titled Smoking (Including Vaping) Policy and Safety Agreement, undated, indicated: - You may not retain your cigarettes, or other smoking materials such as disposable/non-rechargeable e-cigarettes, chewing tobacco, lighters, matches, or other sources of ignition. They will be stored in a locked area by the staff. During a smoking observation on 7/25/24 and 10:19 A.M., three of five residents smoking independently outside said they keep their own cigarettes and lighters in their possession because if they don't the staff will not get them for them timely. Resident #44 was admitted to the facility in May 2024 with diagnoses including asthma and heart failure. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/3/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directives (written documents that instructs health care providers of the decisions for specific medical treatment if a person was unable to speak or lacked the capacity to make decisions for themselves) for one Resident (#62), out of a total sample of 39 residents. Specifically, for Resident #62, the facility failed to ensure that Advanced Directives (Massachusetts Medical Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment form (MOLST)) were consistently documented in the medical record. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Advanced Directives- Basics, dated as revised 10/22, indicated that advanced directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy. 3. In accordance with current OBRA definitions and guidelines governing advanced directives, our facility has defined advanced directives as preferences regarding treatment options and include, but are not limited to: b. Do Not Resuscitate - indicates that, in case…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify and assess the use of pillows tucked underneath a fitted sheet on both sides of the bed as a potential restraint for one Resident (#105) out of a total sample of 39 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Restraint Use, revised January 2023, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: - Physical restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. - Convenience is defined as any action taken by the facility o control a resident's behavior or manage a resident's behavior with a lesser amount of effort by the facility and not in the resident's best interest. - All residents have the right to be free from any form of physical or chemical restraint, imposed by staff as a means of coercion, discipline, convenience or retaliation and not required to treat the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement their abuse prohibition policy for one Resident (#81) out of a total sample of 39 residents. Specifically, for Resident #81, the facility failed to ensure facility staff immediately reported an allegation of physical abuse to the Director of Nursing or Administrator, as required. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Abuse, revised October 2022, indicated, but was not limited to the following: - The facility has designed and implemented processes, which strive to ensure the prevention and reporting of suspected or alleged resident/patient abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation of property. - Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, punching, and kicking - Instruct staff, resident/patient, family, visitor, etc. to report immediately, without fear of reprisal, any knowledge or suspicion of suspected abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and/or misappropriation of property. - All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or misappropriation of resident property will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin (a fracture), for one Resident (#3) out of a total sample of 39 residents. Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Abuse, dated as revised 10/23/22, the facility prohibits the mistreatment, neglect and abuse of residents/patients: - The facility will thoroughly investigate, under the direction of the Administrator, all injuries of unknown source to determine if abuse or neglect was involved. - An injury will be classified as an Injury of Unknown Source when both of the following conditions are met. - The source of the injury was not observed by any person, or the source of the injury could not be explained by the resident. - The injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury. - Facility will initiate the investigative process. The investigation should be thorough with witness statements from staff, residents, visitors and family members who may be interview able and have information regarding the allegation. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to develop a baseline plan of care that included instructions needed to provide effective and person-center care for one Resident out of a total sample of 39 residents. Specifically, for Resident #27, who was assessed upon admission by nursing as a fall risk, the facility failed to develop and implement a plan of care related to falls and Resident #27 subsequently experienced a fall, 4 days after he/she admitted to the facility. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, titled Care Plans - Baseline, revised October 2022, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: - A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with a diagnosis of dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/4/24, indicated that Resident #27 was dependent on staff for transferring and walking. Review of Resident #27's clinical admission note, dated 3/28/24, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed with the interdisciplinary team (IDT) as required for two Residents (#3 and #24) out of a total sample of 39 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #3 the facility failed to review and revise the plan of care related following the removal of a foley catheter (a urinary catheter that is inserted into the bladder). 2. For Resident #24 the facility failed to review and revise the plan of care related to wound care. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Care Plans, dated as revised 1/2023, indicated each resident of this facility shall be involved in the development and review of his/her plan of care along with his/her family member. -Interdisciplinary team conferences shall be held for each resident at 90-day intervals and more often if needed. The interdisciplinary team shall: -Revise the plan of care, treatment, and services. -Care plans shall be updated at the time of the conference or on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for two Residents (#16 and #27) out of a total sample of 39 residents. Specifically: 1) For resident #16 the facility failed to implement physician's orders for prevalon boots and an air mattress for a resident with potential for skin breakdown. 2) For Resident #27 the facility failed to ensure medication orders included a correlating medical diagnosis. Findings include: 1.Resident #16 was admitted to the facility in February 2022 with diagnoses of dementia and malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #16 scored a 0 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating the Resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #16's care plans indicated the Resident had potential for skin breakdown with the following interventions: - Special mattress (e.g. Alternating Air or low air loss mattress) - check function & placement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to provide services to ensure that proper treatment to maintain vision and hearing ability were provided for two Residents (#24 and #62) out of a total sample of 39 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #24 the facility failed to follow up on recommendations from 12/19/23 for an outside ophthalmology consult. 2. For Resident #62, the facility failed to follow up on an ear nose and throat (ENT) appointment for hearing loss. Findings include: 1. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, quadriplegia, and protein malnutrition. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/21/24, indicated that Resident #24 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. Review of Resident #24's physician's orders, indicated the following: - May have Dental, Optometrist, Podiatrist consult as needed, dated 8/10/22. - Ophthalmology consult secondary to change in vision, dated 12/12/22. - Make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion receives appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for one Resident (#35), out of a total sample of 39 Residents. Specifically, for Resident #35, the facility failed to apply left wrist splint daily to left upper extremity. Findings include: Review of policy, titled Appliances-Braces-Slings-Splints, dated as revised 10/22, to protect the safety and well-being of residents, and to promote quality care, the facility uses appropriate techniques and devices for appliances, splints, braces, and slings. To assure all splints, braces, slings, etc. are used appropriately and cared for properly and upper and lower extremities are maintained in a functional position. -Therapy: -teaches resident and nursing staff on how to use, don and doff, care for appliance. -Nursing: -ensures proper schedule for donning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to Residents on one of three units. Specifically, staff were observed sleeping on the [NAME] unit during the overnight shift (11:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M.) on 7/24/24. Findings Include: Review of the General Code of Conduct, dated as revised November 16, 2022, indicated the following: -At [this facility], we expect that the high degree of skill and dedication is shown by our staff will make disciplinary actions necessary only on rare occasions. -Listed below are some examples of behavior and conduct that would result in some form of disciplinary action up to and including immediate termination. *Sleeping on the job. During initial screening on 7/23/24, four Residents on the [NAME] unit, a sub acute unit per the facility assessment, reported that staff are sleeping on the overnight shift. Residents said call light response times are long on the overnight shift. On 7/23/24 at 2:12 P.M., Resident #44 said staff are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed maintain professional standards in the managing and caring for urinary catheter devices for one Resident (#41) out of a total sample of 39 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the urinary catheter drainage bag was not placed directly on the floor. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Catheter - Drainage Bag, revised 1/2023, indicated: - Always attach the drainage bag to the bedframe - never to the side rails. - Keep the drainage bag and tubing off the floor at all times to prevent contamination and damage. Resident #41 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses including paraplegia (paralysis of the legs), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and chronic pain. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/11/24, indicated that Resident #41 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. This MDS also indicated Resident #41 had an indwelling catheter. On 7/23/24 at 2:10 P.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to adhere to professional standards for the administration of enteral feeding (nutrition taken through a tube directly to the stomach) for one Resident (#313) out of a total sample of 39 residents. Specifically, for Resident #313 the facility failed to implement physician's orders for his/her head of bed to be elevated, the facility failed to implement physician's orders for water flushes, and the facility failed to label the enteral feeding bag with the contents inside, and with time the enteral feeding was hung, and therefor staff were unable to identify the formula and staff were unable to determine the expiratory date of the formula based on manufactures guidelines. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Enteral Feedings, dated as revised 10/2022, indicated the following: -Policy: It is the policy of this center to provide enteral nutrition therapy to residents unable to obtain nutrition orally, when such therapy is ordered by the physician and not clinical contraindicated. [sic] -Procedure: -1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide care and maintenance of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) consistent with professional standards of practice for two Residents (#263 and #85) out of a total sample of 39 residents. Specifically: 1.) For Resident #263, the facility failed to ensure nursing implemented a PICC line dressing change as ordered by the physician and failed to ensure nursing dated intravenous (IV) tubing. 2.) For Resident #85, the facility failed to ensure that a PICC line dressing was changed within seven days, and that the nursing failed to obtain a physician's order for PICC line dressing changes. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled PICC Dressing Change, revised 1/2023, indicated: - Transparent dressings are changed every 7 days or sooner if the integrity of the dressing is compromised (wet, soiled, or loose). - Label dressing with date, time, and initials of person performing dressing change. 1.) Resident #263 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with diagnoses including cellulitis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to assess one Resident (#103) for the use of side rails. Specifically, the facility failed to assess the risk of entrapment from side rails, review the risks and benefits of side rails and obtain informed consent from the resident prior to installation of side rails. Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Side Rails, undated, indicated the following: -Each resident will be assessed for functional status on admission, readmission, quarterly, for any significant change and as needed. Side rails will only be used by a resident to assist with his or her bed mobility. -Side rails will be analyzed for safety and prevention of entrapment. -5. the staff shall obtain consent for the use of side rails/ enabler form the resident or the resident's legal representative prior to their use. 6. Resident's that require the use of side rails will obtain an order from the MD indicating that side rails are used to assist with bed mobility. 7. The use of side rails for bed mobility will be documented in the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide routine medications to two Resident (#86 and #92) out of a total sample of 39 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #86, the facility failed to provide eliquis (anticoagulant medication) as ordered by the physician. 2. For Resident #92, the facility failed to provide two scheduled doses of klonopin (an antianxiety medication) as ordered by the physician. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Unavailable Medications, dated as revised December 2019, indicated that medications used by residents in the nursing facility may be unavailable for dispensing from the pharmacy on occasion. This situation may be due to the pharmacy being temporarily out of stock of a particular product, a drug recall, manufacturer's shortage of an ingredient, or the situation may be permanent because the drug is no longer being made. The facility must make every effort to ensure that medications are available to meet the needs of each resident. B. Nursing staff shall: 1.) Notify the attending physician of the situation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#47), out of a total sample of 39 residents, that the Resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. Specifically, the facility failed to complete a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of his/her physician's ordered Lexapro (antidepressant medication). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Psychotropic Medication, dated as revised 2/2022, indicated that Physicians and mid-level providers will use psychotropic medications appropriately working with the interdisciplinary team to ensure appropriate use, evaluation and monitoring. 1. The facility will make every effort to comply with state and federal regulations related to the use of psychopharmacological medications in the long-term care facility to include regular review for continued need, appropriate dosage, side effects, risks and/or benefits. 7. Efforts to reduce dosage or discontinuation of psychopharmacological medications will be ongoing, as appropriate, for the clinical situation. Review of the facility policy titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure laboratory services were provided for one Resident (#62) out of a sample of 39 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a 24-Hour urine was obtained. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dialysis Management, dated as revised 10/2022, indicated residents receiving Hemodialysis treatments will be assessed and monitored to ensure quality of life and well-being. 2. The nurse will obtain orders for monitoring of site, and interventions as appropriate. Orders to include: - Lab work as directed by dialysis and/or physician. Review of the facility policy titled Lab - Procedure, dated as revised 1/2023, indicated to provide a means to check a resident's specimen as ordered by the physician and to maintain a record of the results. 1. Obtain a physician's order for all lab work and enter the order into the EMR (electronic medical record). 2. Determine if labs are routine, scheduled, or immediately (STAT) that would require calling lab directly. 3. Fill out the necessary lab…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for one Resident (#16) out of a total sample of 39 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dental Services, revised October 2022, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: - Both routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the resident's oral health care needs based upon resident assessment and plan of care. - Routine and 24-hour emergency dental services are provided to our residents through: a. A contract agreement with a licensed dentist that comes to the facility monthly; b. Referral to the resident's personal dentist; c. Referral to community dentists; or d. Referral to other health care organizations that provide dental services. - Selected dentist must be available to provide follow-up care. Failure of a dentist to provide follow-up services will result in the facility's right to use its consultant dentist to provide the resident's dental needs. - Identified individuals will assist residents with appointments,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to assess for eligibility, and offer pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations and facility policy for four Residents (#47, #24, #48 and #81) out of a total of five residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of the CDC website Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults greater than or equal to 65 years (cdc.gov), dated 3/1/24 indicated but was not limited to the following: - For adults 65 and over who have not had any prior pneumococcal vaccines, then the patient and provider may choose Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) 20 or PCV15 followed by Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV) 23 one year later. -For adults 65 and over who has had Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine 13 (PCV13) and Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine 23 (PPSV23) and it has been 5 years or greater since the last Pneumococcal Vaccination, then the patient and the vaccine provider may choose to administer the 20-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20). - All adults should have a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for three of three sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3), the Facility failed to ensure they maintained complete and accurate medical records, when documentation by nursing related to the conduction of weekly skin assessment was incomplete, and documentation that was to be completed by Certified Nurse Aides related to completion of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) was also incomplete. Findings include: The Facility's Policy, titled Assessment Schedules, undated, indicated routine weekly skin assessments would be completed by nursing. The Facility Policy, titled Charting and Documentation, dated as last revised 01/2023, indicated all services provided to the residents including assessment data, would be documented in the resident's medical record. The Facility Policy, titled Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Charting and Documentation, dated as last revised 01/2023, indicated all services provided to the resident would be documented in the resident's medical record. 1) Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in August 2019,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents, (Resident #1) the Facility failed to ensure he/she was treated in a dignified and respectful manner, when on 02/09/24 at approximately 1:45 P.M., the Administrator was witnessed interacting with Resident #1 in a demeaning, embarrassing and insulting manner, as he yelled (screamed) at Resident #1 about the cluttered and unsanitary conditions of his/her room. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Resident Rights Policy, dated 02/18/22, indicated all facility staff shall protect and promote the rights of each resident. The Policy indicated Resident Rights shall include the right to a dignified existence. The Policy indicated residents be treated in a respectful manner that supports his/her dignity in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life, recognizing each individuality and contributes to a positive self-image. Resident #1's medical record indicated diagnoses that included paraplegia, panic disorder, dysthymic disorder and personal history of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of four sampled residents (Resident #1), who's Physician Orders included the need for Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP, uses mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open while sleeping) machine and the use of Lymphedema (swelling in the legs) compression machine, both of which were to be applied by Nursing and used by Resident #1 daily, the Facility failed to ensure nursing staff notified his/her Physician when treatments were not being completed daily as ordered. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Physician Orders Policy, revised October 2022, indicated the policy of the Facility to secure Physician Orders for care and services for residents as required by state and federal law. Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Respiratory-Pap Equipment, revised January 2023, indicated the Policy is to instruct the patient in the use of CPAP equipment and ensure proper fit and function of the equipment. The Policy indicated if the resident is admitted to Facility with existing equipment, the nurse should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one out of four sampled residents (Resident #3), the Facility failed to ensure they maintained a complete and accurate medical records including but not limited to completion of Resident Assessments upon admission. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Admission-Readmission, revised October 2022, indicated Nursing is responsible for the Clinical review. The Policy indicated during the admission Process to complete full admission assessment forms complete and record height, weight, and vital signs, (temperature, pulse and respiration, pulse oximetry, if applicable). Resident #3 was admitted in December 2023, diagnoses included stroke, repeated falls, Parkinsonism, progressive Supranuclear Palsy (rare brain condition that affects body movements such as walking, balance, and eye function), depression, and anxiety. Review of Resident #3's Clinical admission Assessment, dated 12/27/23 indicated Resident #3's Nursing admission Assessment which included the following: admission Details, Vitals, Pain, Neurological, Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-21 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for 9 of 9 sampled residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9) the Facility failed to ensure staff complete all sections of the Resident's admission Assessment as required. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled admission Assessment, dated as created 10/2022, indicated the purpose of this procedure is to gather information about the resident's physical, emotional, cognitive and psychosocial condition upon admission for the purposes of managing the resident, initiating the care plan, and completing the required assessment instruments, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS). Review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) MDS 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, dated October 2019, indicated the facility staff will conduct interviews with all residents to comprehensively assess the resident's needs, strengths, goals, life history and preferences. 1) Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in August 2023, and review of his/her medical record indicated he/she was alert and oriented. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for two of nine sampled residents (Resident #3 and Resident #4) the facility failed to ensure they developed and implemented baseline care plans within 48 hours of admission, that provided information at a minimum so that staff could provide the necessary care and services to properly meet their care needs. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy, titled Care Plans- Baseline, dated as revised 10/2022, indicated a baseline care plan to meet the immediate needs of the resident shall be developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission. 1) Review of Resident #3's medical record indicated he/she was admitted to the facility 8/21/23 with diagnoses including coronary artery disease, heart failure, end stage renal disease requiring dialysis, diabetes mellitus, depression, manic depression and post traumatic stress disorder. Review of Resident #3's medical record indicated there was no documentation to support a base line plan of care was developed and implemented within 48 hours of his/her admission, and his/her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, records reviewed and interviews, for one of nine sampled residents (Resident #8) whose diagnoses included high blood pressure, multiple sclerosis, anxiety and recent gastric sleeve surgery, the facility failed to ensure that medication administration was consistent with accepted standards of quality, when Resident #8 was observed ambulating independently down the hallway towards his/her room with a medicine cup containing two pills in hand. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Medication Administration and implemented in 10/2022, indicated the individual administering the medication would identify the resident, confirm the correct medication, correct date and time, correct dosage and correct route of administration. During a tour of the facility on 9/21/23, at approximately 12:50 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #8, who had a medication cup with two small orange tablets (later determined to be hydromorphone, an opioid medication) in it, there was no nurse with Resident #8 at the time, and Resident #8 quickly swallowed the tablets with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed an interviews for one of nine sampled residents (Resident #1) who was admitted to the facility with an infection that required treated with intravenous antibiotic medication, the Facility failed to ensure they obtained his/her physician ordered antibiotic medication timely, as a result Resident #1 was not administered an antibiotic as ordered, and his/she missed multiple doses of his/her intraveous antibiotic, placing him/her at increased risk for worsening of his/her infection. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled, Medication Reconciliation, dated as implemented 1/1/23, indicated all new admissions and readmissions will have a list of all medications ordered upon admission compared and reconciled with all other medications the resident was taking including, medications from home and medications on the discharge summary. Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Medication Ordering and Receiving From Pharmacy, dated as implemented 1/15/21, medications are to be received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-08-12 · tag F0559 — patternHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review and interviews the facility failed to provide written notice, including the reason for the change, before the resident's room or roommate in the facility is changed for one Resident (#35), out of a total sample of 39 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Room Change, dated as revised 10/22, indicated changes in room or roommate assignment shall be made when the resident or their representative requests the change or the facility deems in necessary. The facility will attempt to limit room changes unless otherwise requested by the resident or the resident's representative. 3. When a resident room change is occurring, the resident being moved or their representative, will be informed of the room change. a. The notice of change in room or roommate assignment will be both verbal and in writing and will include the reason(s) for the change. Staff should complete a Room Change Notice and provide to the resident or their representative and be placed in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-08-12 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide an accurate estimated cost of services to Resident's or their representatives, for two Residents (#7 and #62) out of three records reviewed, to ensure they were informed of their potential financial liabilities of the cost of items and services provided in addition to the daily per diem room rate. Findings include: The SNF ABN (CMS-10055) notice is administered to a Medicare recipient when the facility determines that the beneficiary no longer qualifies for Medicare Part A skilled services and the resident has not used all of the Medicare benefit days for that episode. The SNF ABN provides information to residents/beneficiaries so that they can decide if they wish to continue receiving the skilled services that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility. Review of the notices provided to three residents who came off their Medicare Part-A Benefit and, either remained at the facility or discharged home or to a lesser level of care, found that two out of two of the residents, who remained at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-08-12 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide written transfer/discharge notification for two Residents (#52 and #88) out of 39 total sampled residents when transferred to the hospital. Specifically: 1.) For Resident #52, the facility failed to provide written transfer/discharge notification when emergently discharged to the hospital. 2.) For Resident #88, the facility failed to provide written transfer/discharge notification when emergently discharged to the hospital on three separate occasions. Review of the facility policy titled Discharge/Transfer Process, revised 10/2022, indicated: - For transfers to the hospital, the nurse will ensure the appropriate details of the hospital transfer are documented in the resident's medical record. 1.) Resident #52 was admitted to the facility in September 2017 with diagnoses including quadriplegia and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/4/24, indicated that Resident #52 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-08-12 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Resident #83 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses that include alcohol abuse, post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and type 2 diabetes. Review of Resident #83's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 7/4/24, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of a possible 15 indicating that the Resident is cognitively intact. Review of the Resident #83's clinical record indicated that he/she was transferred to the hospital on 5/24/24 and 7/6/24. Additional review of the clinical record failed to indicate the facility provided Resident #83 with a bed hold notice for either transfer, as required. During an interview on 7/25/24 at 9:31 A.M., Nurse #2 said that when a resident is sent out to the hospital the nurse sends a face sheet, medication orders and a summary of why he/she is being sent to the hospital. She said that nursing does not send a bed hold policy with the resident. During an interview on 7/25/24 at 10:40 A.M., Social Worker #1 said nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-08-12 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for four Residents (#88, #58, #92, and #3) of 39 total sampled residents. Specifically: 1.) For Resident #88, the use of restraints was inaccurately coded in the MDS. 2.) For Resident #58, the use of oxygen was inaccurately coded in the MDS. 3.) For Resident #92, the use of non-invasive mechanical ventilation was inaccurately coded on the MDS. 4.) For Resident #3, the development of a fracture was inaccurately coded in the MDS. Findings include: 1.) Review of the facility policy titled Restraints, revised 1/2023, indicated: - If two (2) bedrails are raised, the resident is able to get out of bed; this is not a restraint. Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses including diabetes and hypertension. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/30/24, indicated Resident #88 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$238,905 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $238,905 — penalty dated 2024-08-12
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ADVINIACARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DAVID A. BERKOWITZ REVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/20/2018 |
| DECLARATION OF TRUST OF YOSEF MEYSTEL | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/20/2018 |
| ARSENAULT, DEBRA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/20/2018 |
| TALAMONA, RAYMOND | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/20/2018 |
| LABELLA, CATERINA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/20/2018 |
| SPECTOR, JENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/20/2018 |
| POINTE GROUP CARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/19/2025 |
| BERKOWITZ, BENJAMIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/20/2018 |
| LEGER, GARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/20/2018 |
| TUROFSKY, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/20/2018 |
| WALGER, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/20/2018 |
| BERKOWITZ, DAVID | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/13/2026 |
| MEYSTEL, YOSEF | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/13/2026 |
| CURIS SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/20/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $4.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 30% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225644. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.