AdviniaCare Newport, LLC
398 Bellevue Avenue, Newport, RI 02840 · For profit - Corporation · 114 certified beds · (401) 849-6600 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (26% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $16,801 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-06)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 26.8% | 19.6% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.2% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 2.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.7% | 17.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 3.6% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.2% | 16.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.7% | 16.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 47.7% | 95.2% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.4% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.4% | 22.3% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.9% | 22.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.1% | 2.0% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 64.1% | 78.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 16.7% | 24.3% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.3% | 14.6% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.19 | 1.59 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.22 | 1.68 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.4%CMS range 33.2–61.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 6.1–14.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.4%CMS range 4.2–14.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 102.2 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety relative to the main kitchen and for 1 of 3 nursing unit kitchenettes. Findings are as follows: 1a. The Rhode Island Food Code 2018 Edition 4-501.114, states in part, .a chemical sanitizer for a manual or mechanical operation at contact times .shall be used as follows: (A) A chlorine solution shall have a minimum concentration range 50-99 . 4-501.116 Ware washing Equipment, Determining Chemical Sanitizer Concentration. Concentration of the sanitizing solution shall be accurately determined by using a test kit or other device . 1b. According to the State Operational Manual, Appendix PP- Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, last revised 8/8/2024, states in part, .The chemical solution must be maintained at the correct concentration, based on periodic testing, at least once per shift . During a surveyor observation on 9/3/2024 at approximately 8:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident who is at risk for pressure ulcers receives the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 4 residents reviewed with an actual pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence), Resident ID #67. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility in June of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, diabetes, Parkinson's Disease (a progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and the parts of the body controlled by the nerves) and a stage 3 pressure ulcer (a wound that involves full-thickness skin loss that extends into the subcutaneous tissue) of the sacral region. Review of a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide written notification, including the reason for the room change, prior to changing a resident's room or roommate assignment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed whose room and roommate were changed without prior notification, Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 6/8/2026 alleged in part, Resident ID #1 reported an allegation his/her room was changed, and s/he was assigned a new roommate. Furthermore, the complaint alleged that the new roommate yelled and screamed out at the top of their lungs which impacted the resident's quality of life as s/he could no longer receive visitors in his/her own room. Record review of a facility policy titled Room Change last revised in October of 2022, states in part, .The resident has the right to refuse transfer to another room in the facility if the purpose of the transfer is.Solely for the convenience of staff.When a resident room change is occurring, the resident being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality regarding not following physician orders for obtaining weights for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident ID #1. Additionally, the facility failed to follow the policy to reweigh residents to ensure accuracy when the weight falls outside of the established parameters for 2 of 3 resident's reviewed, Resident ID #s 1 and 3.Findings are as follows:Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 2/12/2026 alleges that Resident ID #1 has had a drastic weight loss.Review of a facility policy titled, Weight Assessment and Interventions reveals in part, .Monthly weights will be obtained each month or as ordered by physician.Weights will be recorded in the medical record.for each resident.any weight change of 5 [pounds] lbs in a month and 3lbs in a week since their last weight assessment should be retaken within 72 [hours] hrs for confirmation and verified by Nursing.1a) Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety relative to the main kitchen and 2 of 3 nourishment units observed.Findings are as follows:1.Record review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code 2022 Edition, Section 3-501.17 states in part, .refrigerated, READY-TO-EAT TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD prepared and PACKAGED by a FOOD PROCESSING PLANT shall be clearly marked .The day or date marked by the FOOD ESTABLISHMENT may not exceed a manufacturer's use-by date if the manufacturer determined the use-by date based on FOOD safety .Surveyor observations during the initial tour of the main kitchen on 12/16/2025 at 9:35 AM, revealed eight, one-quart cartons of cultured buttermilk with a use by date of 12/8/2025.During a surveyor interview with the Food Service Director (FSD) immediately following the above observation, she acknowledged that the cartons of buttermilk were expired and should be discarded.2.Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-19 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life, related to 2 of 2 certified medication technicians (CMT) evaluations reviewed, Staff N and O. Findings are as follows:Record review of the QAPI binder on 12/19/2025 at 12:00 PM with the Administrator and Regional Director of Nursing Services, revealed a performance improvement plan was implemented on 6/17/2024 to establish a tracking system for employee evaluations which included CMT evaluations. This tracking failed to reveal evidence that the quarterly evaluation for CMTs, Staff N and O, were completed until it was brought to their attention by the surveyor during the survey.During a surveyor interview on 12/19/2025 at 12:00 PM with the Regional Director of Nursing Services, she was unable to provide evidence that the facility implemented and maintain an effective QAPI program.Cross…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-19 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to provide a private space for resident council meetings that are held monthly as required. Findings are as follows:During the resident council interview task on 12/17/2025 at 1:18 PM with 14 residents in attendance, collectively they indicated that they are not given privacy when having their regular resident council meetings. The residents indicated that the meetings are typically held in the 1st floor dining room, where the current meeting was being held. Surveyor observations during the resident council meeting on 12/17/2025 from 1:18 PM until approximately 1:55 PM, staff interrupted the meeting at the following times:-1:20 PM - a staff member entered the room and went into the kitchenette area. -1:25 PM - the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) entered the room to get water from the cooler.-1:30 PM- the DNS entered the room again and went into her office, which is adjacent to the dining room area. -1:38 PM - a staff member entered the room to use the sink. -1:50 PM - a staff member entered the room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, and resident interviews, the facility failed to follow and implement physician's orders related to the facility's Bowel Evacuation Protocol for 2 of 2 residents reviewed who did not have a bowel movement for over three days, Resident ID #s 78 and 11. Findings are as follows:Review of a facility policy titled, Bowel Evacuation Protocol dated March 2016, states in part, The facility has the responsibility to ensure that each resident develops regular bowel habits with or without cathartic assistance.to prevent impaction and.promote psychological and social well-being.If the resident has had no bowel movement for 9 consecutive shifts, begin the bowel protocol on the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift. The Bowel protocol is to give Milk of Magnesia (MOM) on the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift. If the MOM is ineffective, then the resident is to receive a Bisacodyl suppository on the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift. If the Bisacodyl suppository is ineffective, then the resident is to receive a Fleets enema…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible, related to securing medications and hazardous equipment (razor) for 1 of 1 treatment cart observed on a secured unit in close proximity to Resident ID #s 9 and 14, and for 1 of 2 smokers reviewed without a smoking assessment, Resident ID #21.Findings are as follows:1. During a continuous surveyor observation on 12/16/2025 of the third-floor (the secure unit) nursing treatment cart located in the hallway, it was observed to be unlocked while unattended by staff for seventeen minutes from 10:37 AM to 10:54 AM.Record review revealed Resident ID #9 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of dementia. Further record review revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 of 15, indicating a severely impaired cognition.During a surveyor observation on 12/16/2025 at approximately 10:00 AM revealed Resident ID #9 wandering in the hallways, self-propelling in his/her wheelchair.Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for resident's relative to 1 of 1 privacy curtain observed with staining, and for 2 of 3 units reviewed without an assigned housekeeper.Findings are as follows:1.Record review revealed Resident ID #94 was admitted to the facility in March of 2024 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, dementia.During a surveyor observation of the resident's room on 12/16/2025 at 10:35 AM, the privacy curtain between the resident's bed and his/her roommate was observed to have large, brown stains that were splattered across the length of the curtain.A subsequent observation of the resident's room on 12/19/2025 at 12:54 PM revealed that the privacy curtain still had the staining and had not been changed.During a surveyor interview with Nursing Assistant, Staff Q, immediately following the above observation, she acknowledged that the resident's privacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to physician's orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed who receives Eliquis (a medication prescribed to prevent and treat blood clots), Resident ID #64.Findings are as follows:According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states in part, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe that the orders are in error or would harm the clients.Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in July of 2023 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of the right lower extremity (a health condition when blood clots form in the vessels blocking blood flow).Record review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a physician's order dated 12/12/2025 for Eliquis 5 milligrams twice daily.Record review of the paper Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, staff, and resident interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for who receives hospice services, Resident ID #78.Findings are as follows:Record review revealed Resident ID #78 was admitted to the facility in March of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, cataracts (a condition which includes the clouding of the eye's lens which can lead to blurred vision and blindness), and adult failure to thrive. Further review revealed this resident was receiving hospice services. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Further review revealed the resident required maximum assistance with ADLs including personal hygiene, bathing and toileting due to incontinence of bowel and bladder. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with an indwelling foley catheter (a flexible tube that collects urine from the bladder and empties into a drainage bag) related to urine output monitoring, Resident ID #10.Findings are as follows:According to Brunner & Suddarth's Textbook of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Volume 2, 10th Edition, page 252 states, .the usual daily urine volume in the adult is 1-2 Liters or 1000-2000 cubic centimeters (cc) [milliliters] . Additionally, page 1282 states, For patients with indwelling catheters, the nurse assesses the drainage system to ensure that it provides adequate urinary drainage. The color, odor, and volume of urine are also monitored. An accurate record of fluid intake and urine output provides essential information about the adequacy of renal function and urinary drainage .Record review of a policy titled URINARY CATHETER CARE dated April of 2015 states in part, .empty drainage bag at least every 8 hours and as necessary.Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who are fed through a feeding tube receive the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a continuous feeding via a jejunal tube (J-tube, a surgically placed device used to give direct access to the small intestine for supplemental feeding, hydration or medicine), Resident ID #13. Findings are as follows: According to Lippincott Nursing Procedures Nineth Edition dated 2023, states in part, .Managing Enteral Tube Feeding Problems.Aspiration of gastric secretions.Elevate the head of the bed a minimum of 30 degrees.Review of a facility policy dated April 2015 titled Enteral Feeding [feeding provided through an alternative method via a J-tube] states in part, .Elevate head of bed 30-45 degrees.Label formula and administration set with date, time, resident's name and nurse initials.Always keep HOB [head of bed] elevated to prevent aspiration.Record review revealed that Resident ID #13 was admitted to the facility in August…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that each resident's medication regimen is free from a medication error rate of 5% or greater. Based on 25 opportunities for errors observed during the medication administration task, there were four errors resulting in an error rate of 16% affecting Resident ID #s 43, 81, 62 and 101.Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #43 has a physician's order for Carvedilol (a medication prescribed to treat several heart and blood vessel conditions by relaxing blood vessels and slowing the heart rate) 3.125 milligrams (mg) twice a day with parameters to hold for a heart rate less 60. During a surveyor observation on 12/18/2025 at 8:53 AM with Certified Medication Technician (CMT), Staff I, she was observed obtaining the resident's heart rate which was 42. Staff I then administered the Carvedilol to the resident. During a surveyor interview with Staff I, immediately following the above observation, she acknowledged the resident's heart rate was 42 and had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections, relative to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP; refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO], for 4 of 4 residents observed on EBP, Resident ID #s 12, 13, 22 and 65. Findings are as follows: Review of the facility signage titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions states in part, .Wear Gown and Gloves prior to these activities .Dressing .bathing .transferring .providing hygiene . Device care or use of a device.feeding tubes.Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room .1. Record review revealed Resident ID #22 was admitted to the facility in December of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, a wound on the right hand. During a surveyor observation on 12/16/2025 at approximately 10:30 AM revealed signage posted outside of Resident ID #22's room indicating s/he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to properly store and serve food under sanitary conditions relative to serving temperatures of a potentially hazardous food item, improper cooling procedures, sanitation of the main kitchen, and infection control practices.Findings are as follows: 1. Record review of the 2022 Food Code published by the U.S Food and Drug Administration Section 4-601.11 (C) reads in part, .non-contact surfaces of equipment shall be free of an accumulation of .dirt, FOOD residue, and other debris . During a surveyor observation on 11/19/2025 at approximately 10:30 AM of the main kitchen, the following was revealed:- a grease accumulation over hood of 6 burner stove- a grease and grime accumulation in corners of the tilt skillet- black sheeting on the shelves of three worktables with an accumulation of debris and food crumbs- a rusted bottom shelf of a worktable that the meat slicer was stored on 2. Record review of the 2022 Food Code published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Section 5-501.113…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-18 · tag F0555 — patternHonor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident has the right to choose his or her attending physician for 3 out of 4 residents reviewed related to physician choice, Resident ID #s 2, 3, and 5.Findings are as follows:Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 8/7/2025 alleges in part, .My facility has a new policy of switching providers when residents go to the hospital. They don't inform the family or resident of the change .1) Record review revealed Resident ID #2 was admitted to the facility in April of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, Parkinson's disease, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score (BIMS) of 15 out of 15, indicating that the resident is cognitively intact.Record review revealed that the resident was under the care of Physician,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff have the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care for 2 of 2 Registered Nurses (RNs) reviewed, Staff B and Staff D and 4 of 6 Nursing Assistants (NAs) reviewed, Staff E, F, G and H. Findings are as follows: Record review failed to reveal evidence of any competencies that were completed for the following nursing staff : -RN, Staff B -RN, Staff D -NA, Staff E -NA, Staff F -NA, Staff G -NA, Staff H During a surveyor interview on 9/5/2024 at 3:45 PM with the Infection Preventionist, during the Staffing Task, she was unable to provide evidence of any completed nursing competencies for the above-mentioned staff.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the menus meet the nutritional needs of the residents in accordance with established national guidelines, that are reviewed by the facility's dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional for nutritional adequacy. Findings are as follows: Record review of the facility's diet manual titled, US Foods Menu Solutions 2015, failed to meet the current established national guidelines (the United States Department of Agriculture established and reviewed national guidelines every 5 years, to promote health, meet nutrient needs and provide guidance for healthy dietary patterns by life stages). The diet manual provided to the surveyor from the facility was from 2010 to 2015, indicating the guidelines were outdated as the current national guidelines were revised in 2020 with new recommendations. Record review of the facility's menu, failed to reveal evidence of the therapeutic exchanges (in the exchange system, foods with a similar nutritional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-06 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for annual training for existing employees consistent with their expected roles, relative to education involving abuse, resident rights, infection control, dementia, behavioral health management, trauma informed care, communication and QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement), per the facility assessment, for 8 of 8 employees, Staff B, D, E, F, G, H, S and T. . Findings are as follows: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 7/19/2024, revealed in part, training and competencies are completed upon hire, annually and on an as needed basis. Additional review of the assessment indicated the following training are required for direct care staff: Abuse Resident Rights Infection Control Dementia & Alzheimer's Disease Behavioral Health Communication QAPI program Record review revealed Registered Nurse (RN), Staff B was hired on 3/12/2015. Review of his training records failed to reveal evidence that he received education…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services being provided meet professional standards of quality relative to following physician's orders for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for obtaining and documenting weights on dialysis treatment days, Resident ID # 61, 1 of 10 residents reviewed with a pressure relieving device, Resident ID #62, and 1 of 2 residents reviewed who receives TED [thrombo-embolis deterrent- a type of compression stocking designed to help prevent blood clots and swelling in the legs] stockings daily, Resident ID # 67. Findings are as follows: According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment, Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #61 was initially admitted to the facility in October of 2019 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, end stage renal disease and dependence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment to prevent further decline in range of motion for 3 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 18, 61 and 70. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #18 was re-admitted to the facility in December of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, stroke and hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body). Record review revealed a physician's orders dated 4/23/2024 for Left resting hand orthosis [splint] may be worn during day hours, as tolerated. Surveyor observations on the following dates and times revealed the resident was without his/her left hand splint applied as ordered: -9/3/2024 at approximately 9:45 AM and 12:00 PM -9/4/2024 at approximately 10:00 AM -9/6/2024 at 8:53 AM and 10:15 AM Record review of the nursing progress notes failed to reveal evidence that the resident removed or refused to wear his/her hand splint. During a surveyor interview on 9/6/2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure residents that are fed through a feeding tube receive the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 of 1 resident reviewed receiving nutrition via a gastrostomy tube (a feeding tube that delivers nutrition, hydration and medication to your stomach through the abdomen), Resident ID #197. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Enteral Feeding states in part, Enteral feeding provides an alternative method of nutritional support via a gastrostomy .tube and is used to enhance and maintain nutritional status when there is an inability to take adequate nutrients orally .PROCEDURE Check physician order for formula, rate and water flushes .Check feeding tube placement with stethoscope .Aspirate [a process to use a syringe to check for contents remaining] stomach contents to check for residual [quantity of tube feed remaining in the stomach] .Hold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care, Resident ID #49. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility policy, with a revision date of November 2020, titled, Oxygen Administration Nasal Cannula states in part, .Replace and date cannula [tubing that delivers oxygen through the nose] and tubing weekly or when visibly soiled or damaged . Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in May of 2023 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a condition caused by damage to the airways or other parts of the lungs that blocks airflow and makes it difficult to breathe). Review of a physician's order dated 6/24/2024 revealed an order for the resident to receive supplemental oxygen at 1-2 liters/minute via nasal cannula as needed every shift. During surveyor observations on the following dates and times, the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the pharmacist failed to report irregularities to the attending physician, the facility's Medical Director, and the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for monthly drug regimen reviews, Resident ID #59. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility policy titled Drug Regimen Review- Monthly revealed in part, .the consultant Pharmacist shall review the medical record of each resident and perform a Drug Regimen Review at least once each calendar month. The Consultant Pharmacist shall identify, document and report possible medication irregularities for review and action by the attending Physician, where appropriate .Consultant Pharmacist .Shall perform Medication Regimen Review for each resident at least monthly. This review shall be performed by evaluating the medical record of each resident, which contains the current Medication Regimen as documented on the most recent Physician's Order Sheets or electronic record of current orders . Record review revealed Resident ID #59 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 4 residents reviewed receiving insulin, Resident ID #59 and 1 of 4 residents reviewed receiving an Antipsychotic medication (medications that mainly treat psychosis and, related conditions and symptoms), Resident ID #74. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #59 was admitted to the facility in April of 2023 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 6/7/2024 for Fiasp (insulin) 100 unit/milliliter (ml) sliding scale. Special instructions: Per sliding scale if blood sugar is less than 70, call MD [medical doctor] If blood sugar is 150 to 199, give 1 units. If blood sugar is 200 to 249, give 2 units If blood sugar is 250 to 300, give 3 units If blood sugar is 301 to 349, give 4 units If blood sugar is 350 to 399, give 6 units If blood sugar is 400 to 449, give 8 units If blood sugar is 450 to 500, give 10 units.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store drugs and biological's in accordance with currently accepted professional principles relative to 1 of 2 medication rooms observed, 2 of 2 medication carts observed on unit 2, and 2 residents observed with medications at the bedside, Resident ID #s 22 and 63. Findings are as follows: 1. Surveyor observation on 9/5/2024 at 9:39 AM in the presence of Medication Aide, Staff I, of the basement medication storage room revealed the following: -Six medication bottles of Calcium 600 mg (milligram) with Vitamin D 10 mcg (microgram) with an expiration date of 8/2024. -Two medication bottles of Acetaminophen 160 mg/5 ml (milliliter), one with an expiration date of 1/2024 and the other with an expiration date of 2/2024. During a surveyor interview at time of observation with Staff I, she acknowledged the medications were expired and indicated they should be discarded. 2. During a surveyor observation on 9/4/2024 from 12:25 PM to 12:55 PM of the second floor revealed the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records that are accurately documented in accordance with professional standards and practices for 2 of 4 residents reviewed with a splint (a device used to prevent decreased range of motion), Resident ID #s 61 and 70, and 1 of 2 residents reviewed who has an order for TED stockings (thrombo-embolis deterrent- a type of compression stocking designed to help prevent blood clots and swelling in the legs) daily, Resident ID #67. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #61 was admitted to the facility in October of 2019 with diagnoses which include, but are not limited to, stroke and hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body). Record review of the physician's orders revealed an order dated 10/24/2023 for Right resting hand splint to be donned [to put on] during the day, as tolerated every shift. Surveyor observation on 9/5/2024 at 1:20 PM revealed the resident lying in the bed, without his/her right-hand splint applied as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public related to the basement conference room. Findings are as follows: Surveyor observation in the basement conference room on 9/5/2024 at 12:07 PM, revealed a large amount of water pouring down from the ceiling light onto a table below, spraying liquid droplets in an approximate four foot radius, saturating a surveyor's computer, resident records and personnel training records. During a surveyor interview on 9/5/2024 at 12:09 PM with the Assistant Director of Maintenance, Staff R, he revealed the cause of the water coming from the ceiling was due to a toilet on the second floor that was clogged by a large bowel movement and was overflowing. Additionally, he revealed this happened on two previous occasions last week. Staff R further revealed that he did not inform anyone of issue with the toilet overflowing because he felt that he had fixed the issue by plunging the toilet. During a surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure residents receive and consume food in the appropriate form, for 1 of 3 residents observed with physician orders for a mechanical soft diet, Resident ID #39. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in January of 2018 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, dementia. Record review of a physician's diet order 9/13/2023 states in part, .LCS [Low Concentrated Sweets]; Mechanical soft [proteins that are ground or cut up] . Record review of the lunch menu for Thursday September 6, 2024 revealed the following: -Salisbury Steak -Mashed Potatoes -Peas During a surveyor observation during the lunch meal on 9/5/2024 at approximately 12:30 PM, the resident was eating his/her lunch. Record review of the resident's diet ticket during the above observation revealed in part, .LCS/Chopped . Further observation of the resident's meal tray revealed that the Salisbury Steak was cut in strips that were approximately 1 1/2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive adequate supervision to prevent an accident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for elopement, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility policy titled elopement dated July 2015 states in part, .elopement is defined as the ability for a resident who is not capable of protecting himself or herself from harm to successfully leave the facility unsupervised . Record review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 6/11/2024 indicated, that Resident ID #1 was found outside of the facility on 6/10/2024. Record review revealed that the resident was readmitted to the facility in May of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia, delusional disorder (psychotic disorder), and paranoid personality disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 7 out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure it stores, distributes, and serves food in accordance with professional standards for food safety relative to the main kitchen and 1 of 3 unit kitchenettes. Findings are as follows: 1. Review of Rhode Island Food Code, 2018 edition, section 3-501.17 states in part, .refrigerated ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 5 C [degrees Celsius] (41 F [degrees Fahrenheit]) or less for a maximum for 7 days. The date of preparation shall be counted as day 1 . During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 9/11/2023 at 8:50 AM, there were two, 6 inch by 6 inch pans underneath the prep counter. One was filled with white, viscous food matter and the other pan contained crumbled, white food matter. Both pans were observed to be covered in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services provided meet professional standards of quality for 2 of 7 residents reviewed relative to physician orders, Resident ID #s 49 and 85. Findings are as follows: Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physicians' orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. 1. Record review for Resident ID #49 revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in October of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, pain, history of venous thrombus (blood clot in the vein), spinal stenosis, and vertebral compression fractures. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 6/7/2023, which states May have Palliative care consult for pain management. Record review revealed the palliative care consult was completed on 8/2/2023, indicating the consult was completed almost 2 months from the order date. Further review of the palliative care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 2 of 5 residents reviewed with pressure ulcers (a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying skin usually over a boney prominence), Resident ID #s 37 and 73. Findings are as follows: Record review of the facility policy dated 7/2017 and titled, Prevention & Management of Pressure Injuries states in part, Standard .The necessary treatment and services will be provided to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new pressure injuries from developing. POLICY: Residents with pressure injuries and those at risk for skin breakdown are identified, assessed, and provided appropriate treatment to encourage healing and/or maintenance of skin integrity. Ongoing monitoring and evaluation are provided . PROTOCOL: Assessment: Ulcer/Risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — patternProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents receive treatment relative to foot care for 2 of 8 residents observed, Resident ID #s 81 and 80. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review for Resident ID #81 revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in September of 2022 with a diagnosis that includes, but is not limited to, Parkinson's disease. Record review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating his/her cognition is intact. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 1/31/2023 for podiatry services as needed (PRN). During a surveyor interview on 9/11/2023 at approximately 9:17 AM with the resident, s/he revealed that s/he would like to see a podiatrist to have his/her nails cut. During a surveyor observation of the resident's toenails on 9/12/2023 at approximately 3:30 PM revealed long, thickened, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store and label drugs and biological's in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed, and 2 of 3 medication rooms reviewed. Findings are as follows: Record review of an undated facility policy titled Medication Storage states in part, .Medications must be stored in accordance with manufacturer's specifications . A. Medication Carts 1. During a surveyor observation on 9/12/2023 at 8:50 AM of the 3rd floor Medication Cart B, in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Staff D, revealed the following: - One box of Budesonide 0.5 milligrams (mg)/2 milliliters (mL) ampule vial neb inhaler, containing 3 sealed foil envelopes and one single ampule in the box, not in the foil envelope and not labeled with a date. Manufacturer's guidance indicates store ampules in the foil envelope. Date once the foil envelope is opened and discard after 2 weeks. During a surveyor interview with Staff D immediately following the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — patternProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to provide or obtain from an outside resource, emergency dental services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dental pain, Resident ID #49. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in October of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, morbid obesity, other specified nutritional deficiencies, and protein calorie malnutrition (a deficit of protein). Record review of a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS; an assessment tool used to evaluate a resident's cognitive function) score of 12 out of 15, indicating the resident has a moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed under section L, Oral/Dental status, that the resident was assessed to have obvious or likely cavities or broken natural teeth. Record review revealed a physician order dated 10/6/2022 for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated for 1 of 1 residents reviewed who was noted to have bruising to his/her genital area, Resident ID #85. Findings are as follows: According to the State Operation Manual Appendix PP- Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, last revised 2/3/2023 states in part, .Possible indicators of physical abuse include an injury that is suspicious because the source of the injury is not observed, the extent or location of the injury is unusual .Examples of injuries that could indicate abuse include, but are not limited to .Bruises, including those found in unusual locations .The location of the injury (e.g., the injury is located in an area not generally vulnerable to trauma) .Examples of Injuries of Unknown Source .Unobserved/Unexplained bruising or other injuries in the genital area . Record review of the facility policy dated September 2020, titled, ABUSE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives necessary respiratory care and services that are in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care, Resident ID #49. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in May of 2023 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, stage four chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a type of progressive lung disease characterized by long-term respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation). Surveyor observations of the resident on the following dates and times revealed s/he was receiving oxygen therapy via nasal cannula at 2 liters per minute: -9/11/2023 at 9:17 AM -9/12/2023 at 8:26 AM -9/12/2023 at 10:12 AM During a surveyor interview with the resident on 9/12/2023 at 10:12 AM s/he revealed that s/he has not been receiving oxygen therapy for very long, but that s/he does get out of breath sometimes. Record review failed to reveal evidence of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services provided meet professional standards of quality relative to following a physician's order for medication for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 8/3/2023, alleges in part, that the resident complained of abdominal pain, nausea and episodes of frequent bloody vomit and had been requesting to go to the hospital for two days. Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states: The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. Record review revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility in June of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, end stage renal disease (a disease where the kidneys reach an advanced state of loss of function) and hypertension. Record review revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-12-19 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation and record review, the facility failed to protect identifying information for 7 current residents listed in the facility's survey results binder for 2 of 4 surveys reviewed.Findings are as follows:During a surveyor observation on 12/17/2025 at approximately 1:45 PM of the first floor, a black binder with a title of State Survey Results was stored on a wall in the entrance to the facility, facing the public.Record review of the survey binder revealed resident rosters (a list provided to a facility that corresponds to a number identifier utilized in a survey to protect privacy) included with the statement of deficiencies for the following surveys:- Survey results for exit date 9/18/2025, identifying Resident ID #s 74 and 99- Survey results for exit date 9/6/2024, identifying Resident ID #s 12, 32, 60, 61, and 74Further record review of the above surveys with the attached rosters contained information including, but not limited to, physician's orders and medical diagnoses.During a surveyor interview on 12/17/2025 at 2:05 PM with the Administrator, he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$16,801 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-09-06
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ADVINIACARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.2 | +1.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RI 5 HOLDCO OP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/30/2026 |
| BENJAMIN BERKOWITZ REVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/30/2026 |
| ENYKRI, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/30/2026 |
| LEAH BRAUN TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/30/2026 |
| RI 5 INVESTOR GROUP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/30/2026 |
| BRAUN, SHRAGA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/30/2026 |
| 1219 LIMTED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| 257 LIMTED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| 42170 LIMTED PARTNERSHIP | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| BIDER FAMILY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| BUNNELI, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| CBA II, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| F SQUARED INVESTMENTS, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| FREDERICK S FRANKEL TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| JOSHUA HOFFMAN TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| MARLEE ASSOCIATES | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| MSAR ENTERPRISES, LP | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| PEARL KAHAN 2023 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| ROBIN MILLER REVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| S&D INVESTMENTS | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| SILVER EQUITIES | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| WILHELM LEGACY TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| YCD GROUP, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| BRAM, TOVA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| GOLDFARB, BRIAN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| HAMUI, MORIEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| KAHAN, JEROME | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| KATZ, SHMUEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| KROLL, JOETTE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| LEINER, YISROEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| MANDELBAUM, AVRAHAM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| MEYSTEL, JOEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| RAPOPORT, YITZCHOK | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| ROSENBERG, ZEV | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| RUSSELL, ARYEH | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| SALAMON, ISRAEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| SALAMON, MARK | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| SALAMON, NATHANIEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| SPECTOR, JENNIFER | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| SUSSMAN, JOEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| TOBER, YEHUDA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| TWERSKI, BASSHEVA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| ULBERT, LISA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| WILHELM, NAFTALI | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| WILHELM, YEHOSHUA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| ADVINIA PROPERTIES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| ADVINIACARE, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| DONNELLY, SHARI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| HADI, NEIMA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| TALAMONA, RAYMOND | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| TOWNSEND, PATRICK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| TUROFSKY, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| BERKOWITZ, BENJAMIN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2026 |
| BRAUN, LEAH | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2026 |
| YOLINSKY, JACK | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2026 |
| BELLEVUE AVE, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/02/2026 |
| CURIS SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| DAVID A BERKOWITZ DELTA TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| POINTE PROPERTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
| YOSEF MEYSTEL DELTA TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2026 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 77 rows in the source record cover these 60 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
29 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in RI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Rhode Island Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 415033. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.