Country Lane Manor
819 Country Lane Road, Keosauqua, IA 52565 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (319) 293-3761 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Apr 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0570)
- it has 5 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $59,150 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-02)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.7% | 17.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.9% | 4.6% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 2.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 13.1% | 4.2% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 3.8% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.7% | 16.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.4% | 20.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.0% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.6% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.9% | 25.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.0% | 19.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.7% | 2.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 47.6% | 73.3% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.56 | 1.49 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.13 | 2.08 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.5%CMS range 43.1–71.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 6.5–13.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 50.9 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
57 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to carry out assessments and interventions for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for a change in condition (Resident #10, and #209). The facility failed to carry out assessments/interventions for a resident with a low blood sugar (#10), and failed to carry out interventions after a resident did not have a bowel movement for multiple days (#209). The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: 1. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 scored a 14 out of 15 on the BIMS exam, which indicated cognition intact. The MDS revealed diagnoses for acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, renal insufficiency, neurogenic bladder, and diabetes mellitus. The Care Plan revealed a focus area revised on 4/23/24 for risk for alterations in blood glucose levels related to diabetes diagnosis. The interventions dated 4/19/24 revealed glucagon kit as ordered; observation for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-05-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, resident interview, provider interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to implement timely interventions for residents identified at high risk for pressure ulcer development and to prevent worsening of wounds, perform thorough and consistent assessment which included wound measurements and wound description, and coordinate which staff from the clinical team staged and measured wounds for two of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #20, Resident #208). Resident #20 developed a deep tissue injury to the right heel and stage two pressure ulcer to the coccyx, and Resident #208 admitted with wounds not thoroughly assessed by the facility on admission, nor consistently monitored, staged, or measured following the resident's admission. The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: The MDS identified the following descriptions of pressure ulcers: Stage I is an intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accidents and hazards for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent falls for Residents #42 and #18, and #19, and failed to utilize both foot pedals during wheelchair locomotion for Resident #211. The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 10/27/23, listed diagnoses for Resident #42 which included fracture of the right femur (leg bone), non-Alzheimer's dementia, and heart failure. The MDS documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 out of 15 indicating impaired cognition. The MDS stated the resident required partial/moderate assistance for transfers and walking. The MDS stated during the review period, the resident had 1 fall with injury and 2 falls with a non-major injury. The MDS listed the Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-05-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, policy review, staff interviews, family interview and resident interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement interventions to prevent/treat weight loss for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition (Residents #13 and #52) and failed to provide ordered supplements for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition (Residents #18 and #34). The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 3/27/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #52 which included dementia, adult failure to thrive, and muscle weakness. The MDS stated the resident required partial/moderate assistance with eating and listed her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 7 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. A Dietary Assessment, dated 3/26/24 listed the resident's weight as 97.8 lbs. The residents Weight Summary report documented the resident weighed 99.8 lbs on 3/22/24 and 93.0 lbs on 4/16/24, which calculated as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to safely provide cares when turning a resident in bed which led to a fall with facial fractures for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for supervision. (Resident #1) The facility reported census was 53. Findings include: According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 5/17/23, Resident #1 had long- and short-term memory deficits and a severely impaired cognitive status. Resident #1 required extensive to total dependence of two staff with mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs and a diagnosis, which included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia. In an interview on on 7/25/23 at 8:17 a.m. Staff J, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), stated on 6/8/23 she was preparing to get Resident #1 ready for supper. As was a common practice, Staff J was changing and positioning a Hoyer sling beneath her. As she rolled Resident #1 by her shoulders and waist towards her, Resident #1 was stiff and pushed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident free from financial exploitation when a staff member didn't return change from a purchase made on behalf of a resident for 1 of 10 (Resident #3) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 46 residents.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #3, dated 1/20/26 included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS identified the resident as always able to make herself understood and always able to understand others. A list of diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure and muscle weakness. A review of the electronic health record (EHR) revealed Resident #3 diagnosed with COVID on 3/19/26.Review of the facility's self-reported incident submitted 3/26/26 described Resident #3 reported she gave a Housekeeper (Staff A) $20 on 3/23/26 to purchase bottled water and chips for her, and Staff A returned with 3 bottles of water, 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to follows safe sanitation and food handling practices to prevent cross contamination and foodborne illness. The facility reported a census of 51 residents.Findings include:1. During the initial tour of the kitchen on 8/4/25 at 10:49 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM) included:a. Partially uncovered leftover chocolate cake on a cookie tray set in the dry goods storage areab. A gallon of 2% white milk with a date of 8/2/25 in the walk-in refrigerator. The Dietary Manager stated she thought the milk good for 3 days past the expiration date.c. An 18-quart container with shredded yellow cheese in the walk-in refrigerator. The container had a date of 7/6/25 written on a label. The Dietary Manager disposed of the container.d. The inside of a [brand name redacted] microwave had dried tan residue on the inside of the device. 2. During the observation of the noon meal process on 8/6/25 started at 11:00 AM, the following noted:a. The inside of the [brand name redacted] microwave continued to have dried tan residue on the inside of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-12 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, review of CMS-2567 reports, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an effective QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) process to prevent three deficiencies identified in the 2024 recertification from being cited again during the current recertification survey. The facility reported a census of 51 residents.Findings include: Review of the facility's CMS-2567 form the Recertification survey conducted from 9/09/24 to 9/16/24 revealed the following 3 (three) deficiencies cited:a. F690 (Bowel/Bladder, Incontinence, Catheter, UTI);b. F812 (Food Procurement, Store/Prepare/Serve-Sanitary);c. F865 (QAPI Program/Plan, Disclosure/Good Faith Attempt). During the most recert Recertification survey conducted 8/4/25 to 8/12/25 a total of 10 (ten) deficiencies cited, which included:a. F690 (Bowel/Bladder, Incontinence, Catheter, UTI);b. F812 (Food Procurement, Store/Prepare/Serve-Sanitary);c. F865 (QAPI Program/Plan, Disclosure/Good Faith Attempt). During an interview on 8/12/25 at 9:45 AM, the Administrator stated Quality Assurance Committee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to attempt to designate resident representation for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #23) with a moderate cognitive impairment and intellectual disability, to ensure medical and financial decisions were made with informed consent. The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/24/25, revealed Resident #23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 out of 15, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The list of diagnoses included mild intellectual disabilities, mood disorder, psychotic disorder, anxiety disorder, and depression. The MDS indicated Resident #23 had limited ability in making concrete requests and responded adequately only to simple, direct communication. Review of Resident #23's admission Record (also referred to as a Resident Face Sheet), revealed an admission date of 9/26/24 to the facility, and listed Resident #23 (self) as the only contact. Review of the Care Plan, revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a self-medication assessment for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #9) who self-administered insulin. The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/31/25, revealed Resident #9 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The list of diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus, paraplegia, and spina bifida. The MDS indicated Resident #9 received insulin injections on a daily basis. During an observation on 8/06/25 at 11:40 AM, Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN), prepared Resident #9's Novolog Flexpen by attaching needle and dialing pen to 30 units of insulin, as ordered. Resident #9 cleaned own right lower abdominal area with an alcohol wipe, Staff B handed the the prepared insulin pen to Resident #9, and Resident #9 injected self in right lower abdomen with insulin, then held pen in place as she counted to 10, as Staff B watched. Following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to allow 1 of 1 residents (Resident #28) reviewed for smoking, to choose to continue smoking after the facility changed their smoking policy to be a smoke free campus. The facility reported 51 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/27/25, revealed Resident #28 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The list of diagnoses included anxiety disorder and depression. The MDS indicated Resident #28 independent for all transfers and activities of daily living. The MDS identified an admission date of 11/25/2024. Review of the Care Plan, date initiated 1/09/25, revealed a Focus area to address Resident #28 liked to smoke related to a history of smoking. Interventions included, in part:a. Ensure Resident #28 is aware of facility smoking policy. b. Show Resident #28 where smoking is allowed and how to access. Review of a facility provided document titled, Memo to Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of low blood pressure results, and of persistent coughing despite a change in diet order and the administration of an as needed cough syrup for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #17 and #46) reviewed for physician notification. The facility reported a census of 51 residents.Findings include: 1.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/29/25, revealed Resident #17 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The list of diagnoses included orthostatic hypotension, quadriplegia (limited ability with movement or sensation of upper and lower extremities, and benign paroxysmal vertigo of unspecified ear (dizziness caused by an inner ear condition). Review of the Care Plan, date initiated 1/06/2022, revealed Resident #17 had a self-care deficit and was at risk for falls due, in part, to hypotension (low blood pressure).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interviews the facility failed to include the use of an indwelling catheter prior to admission on the care plan for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #49) reviewed for care plans. The facility reported a census of 51 residents.Findings include: Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/01/25, revealed the list of diagnoses for Resident #49 included benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH or enlarged prostate), urinary tract infection (UTI) within the last 30 days, and overflow incontinence. The MDS indicated Resident #49 required an indwelling urinary catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. The MDS indicated an admission date of 6/26/25. Review of an admission Order Sheet, signed by physician on 6/27/25, revealed that Resident #49 had an indwelling catheter which was to be changed every 30 days for diagnoses of BPH and overflow incontinence. During an observation, on 8/04/25 at 12:44 PM, Resident #49 sat in wheelchair, with an urinary catheter tubing and drainage bag stored underneath wheelchair, urine visible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to clarify orders for indwelling catheter care and follow up on an order for a urinalysis in a timely manner for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #49) reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility reported a census of 51 residents.Findings include:Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/01/25, revealed Resident #49 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12 out of 15, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The list of diagnoses included benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH or enlarged prostate), urinary tract infection (UTI) within the last 30 days, and overflow incontinence. The MDS indicated Resident #49 required an indwelling urinary catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. Review of the Baseline Care Plan, dated for admission on [DATE], revealed Resident #49 required indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the Care Plan, date initiated 6/26/25, revised 7/15/25 lacked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on attendance record review and interview, the facility failed to have the minimum required members in attendance at their Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings. The facility reported a census of 51 residents. Findings include:Review of the facility's QAPI attendance sheets since the last recertification survey on 9/16/24, revealed that QAPI meetings were held on 10/18/24, 11/13/24, 1/15/25, 4/9/25, and 7/16/25. The attendance records revealed that the Medical Director was present only at the meeting on 4/9/25. On 8/12/25 at 8:50 a.m., the Administrator stated that the QAPI Policy does not address the members who need to be present quarterly. The Administrator added that she felt the Medical Director was at more than one meeting in the past year but cannot find anything to prove it.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow infection prevention protocols for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #9 and Resident #14) reviewed with indwelling urinary devices. The facility reported a census of 51 residents.Findings include:1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #9 as cognitively intact with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 out of 15. The list of diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, spina bifida and necrotizing fasciitis. The MDS identified Resident #9 dependent on staff assistance for toileting, showers, lower body dressing, putting on a taking off footwear. It also identified Resident #9 required partial/moderate staff assistance with upper body dressing, personal hygiene and transfers and had an ostomy (had both colostomy and urostomy). The MDS indicated Resident #9 admitted to the facility with a urostomy. Review of the Care Plan, dated 7/22/25, revealed a Focus area to address [name redacted]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to initiate treatment for an eye infection timely and in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 residents reviewed. (Resident #3) The facility reported census was 53. Findings include: According to a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 4/29/25, Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating a severely impaired cognitive status. Resident #3's diagnosis included non-Alzheimer ' s dementia. According to a Progress Note dated 4/20/25 at 6:09 p.m. and written by Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Resident #3's family summoned the nurse to assess Resident #3's right eye. The right eye was swollen, reddened and draining. Resident #3 indicated it was itchy and hurt a bit. Staff B indicated a communication note was left for the provider (nurse practitioner or physician). A Communication with Provider form was filled out by Staff B, dated 4/20/25 indicating Resident #3's right eye was swollen, reddened , with some drainage and Resident #3 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, food temperatures during food services, and resident interview, the facility failed to serve food in an attractive and palatable manner for 1 of 2 meals. The facility reported census was 59. Findings include: On 2/12/25 at 12:15 p.m., a sample lunch tray provided to the State Agency. The meal consisted of a chicken patty and green beans. The chicken patty edges were hard, tough and chewy. No concerns with the green beans noted. An observation in the dining room revealed the puree green beans served to a resident appeared to be of a soup consistency. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #7 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating an intact cognitive status. Resident #7 was independent with transfers, mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs and was occasionally incontinent of bladder. Resident #7's diagnosis included congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, provider and staff interviews the facility failed to implement a physician order to change a type of wound dressing for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #6) with a wounds. The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Finding include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/12/24, revealed Resident #6 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating intact cognition. The MDS revealed the resident required partial/moderate assistance with rolling from left to right; sit to standing; and upper body dressing. The MDS identified the resident dependent for chair/bed to chair transfers. The MDS list of diagnoses included necrotizing fasciitis (bacterial infection that destroys tissue under the skin), diabetes mellitus, and wound infection. The MDS documented the resident had two Stage III pressure ulcers present on admission, along with surgical wounds. The Nursing Note dated 9/6/24 at 2:52 PM revealed resident arrived at facility via hospital transport accompanied by transport driver. Resident is a spina bifida…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to have a consistent plan and procedure for advance directives for 6 of 25 residents reviewed. (Resident #9, #17, #19, #34, #42, and #60). The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of facility document, Policy For Resuscitative Services/Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), indicated on [DATE] Resident #9 signed she would like to have CPR performed in the event that her respirations or pulse would cease. Review of Resident #9's EHR (Electronic Health Record) on [DATE], failed to indicate a code status on the header of Resident #9's file. Observations on [DATE] revealed a Full Code magnet outside of Resident #9's door was placed on the right side of the door. Magnets on the right side indicated the Resident in bed B, Left side indicated bed A. Resident #9 was in bed A. Revealing the magnet was on the wrong side of the door. 2. Review of Resident #17's EHR header indicated Full Code status and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility provided documents, and interviews the facility failed to provide sufficient qualified nursing staff to provide nursing services that meet the residents' needs safely and in a timely manner and promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: In an interview on 9/12/24 at 1:30 PM, Staff C, RN, indicated that during the process of admissions, when the resident comes to the facility from the hospital a packet will be sent with them. This packet includes the resident's health history, medication orders, lab orders, and any treatment or therapy orders. There have been times this packet was not available, the nurse would need to find who has it (at times has been the DON or administrative staff), if the nurse is not able to locate the packet they are to contact the hospital and get it faxed to them. Once the packet is reviewed orders are faxed to the pharmacy. The MDS nurse does the batch orders (standing orders including the resident's level of care and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide Monthly Drug Regimen Reviews for the month of July. The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: During a review of the monthly pharmacy reviews, it was revealed there were no reviews done for any residents residing in the facility for the month of July. On 9/10/24 at 4:02 p.m., the Administrator stated that there was no pharmacy review done in July. The Administrator handed an email from a Consultant Pharmacist. The Administrator stated that the pharmacist that wrote the email was not the facility's normal consultant pharmacist. An email dated 8/8/24 at 8:13 a.m., from a Consultant Pharmacist, documented that the consultant pharmacist noted that recommendations from July were not completed. The Consultant Pharmacist documented that she had re-issued any recommendations that were still relevant. This pharmacist requested that the facility let her know if there was anything she could do to assist with getting these taken care of. A Consultant Pharmacist Reports - Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent potential for contamination when gloves were not changed at appropriate times during meal service for 1 of 1 meal services observed. The facility failed to ensure resident food had been stored at appropriate temperatures and expired food had been removed when 1 of 1 resident food refrigerators lacked a thermometer, temperature log, labels, and opened dates of food or drinks. The facility further failed to ensure dish sanitation when the dishwasher log lacked entries for safe wash and rinse temperatures and the cups used for service appeared to have a coating of white film for 1 of 1 facility dishwashers. The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: On 9/09/24 at 10:46 AM, during initial tour of the kitchen, a refrigerator/freezer kept in the dining room, contained many undated and unlabeled food and drinks. The Dietary Manager revealed this refrigerator contained resident food and drinks brought in for resident use. The Dietary Manager confirmed the resident food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, review of CMS-2567 reports, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an effective QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) process to address previously identified quality deficiencies, resulting in multiple repeat deficiencies identified on the facility's current recertification and complaint survey previously identified during surveys completed in the last six months. The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's CMS-2567 form from a recertification survey which occurred 4/29/24 to 5/02/24 revealed the facility received non-harm level citations for the following areas: resident rights/dignity, reasonable accommodation of needs, services provided meet professional standards, bowel/bladder incontinence, or catheter, sufficient nursing staff, psychotropic drug use, food procurement/storage/service/sanitation, and QAPI program/plan. The facility's current recertification survey, entrance date 9/09/24, resulted in multiple repeated non-harm level deficient practices for the following areas:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure resident choice of caregivers had been respected for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for dignity, when a caregiver continued to assist with cares following resident request otherwise. The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition and intermittent behavior that included rejection of care. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, depression, and neuropathy. The Care Plan, revised 7/25/24, revealed Resident #18 had a self-care deficit and required one person staff assistance for bed mobility, dressing, transfers, and toileting. The Care Plan informed that Resident #18 would refuse a gait belt at times but lacked indication for refusal of cares or preferences with caregivers. Review of Nursing Progress Notes, revealed the following entries:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure accessibility of a hand washing sink and working overhead lamp in resident room for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for choices. The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. MDS revealed Resident #18 had moderate hearing difficulty and limited vision. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, depression, and neuropathy. The Care Plan, revised 7/25/24, revealed Resident #18 had a self-care deficit and required one person staff assistance for bed mobility, dressing, transfers, and toileting. On 9/09/24 at 1:30 PM, Resident #18 reported an inability to get their wheelchair into the bathroom to reach or access the sink. Resident #18 reported over-bed lamp had a difficult pull string and light often did not work.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure basic nursing principles were followed for 2 of 24 residents reviewed (Resident #9 and Resident #20). The facility readmitted Resident #9 from a hospital stay and did not ensure that the primary provider was aware of her readmission therefore this resident did not receive a number of her medications. The facility obtained an order of liquid morphine (narcotic) for Resident #20 who was on Hospice Care and actively dying. The facility did not obtain a bottle of liquid morphine for Resident #20 and gave her the medication from another resident's bottle. The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 had diagnoses of anemia, heart failure, depression, hypertension (high blood pressure), stage 4 chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes with diabetic chronic kidney disease, seizure disorder, and a history of stroke. Review of Resident #9's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow Provider's orders for indwelling catheter balloon size for 1 of 2 resident (Resident #43) reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated , 8/13/24, revealed Resident #43 utilized an indwelling catheter and had diagnoses of Neurogenic bladder and urinary retention. The Care Plan, dated 5/14/24, revealed Resident #43 had an indwelling catheter, placed on 5/11/24, with goal that catheter will be managed appropriately and not exhibit signs of infection or urethral trauma. Interventions included: use of a 16 French (size) catheter with 10 milliliter (mL) balloon and to change catheter as ordered by Provider. Review of a telephone order, dated 5/14/24, and signed by Provider on 5/17/24, revealed an order for indwelling (Foley) catheter size 16 French with 10 mL balloon, changed every 30 days, for diagnosis of urinary retention. The Medication/Treatment Administration Record (MAR/TAR), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) was trialed for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #38). A Consultant Pharmacist recommended a GDR for Duloxetine (antidepressant medication)from 40 mg (milligrams) to 30 mg for Resident #38 in November of 2023. The primary provider for Resident #38 agreed to the GDR in January of 2024. The Duloxetine was not decreased per the recommendation and approval of the provider. The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: A Minimum Data Set for Resident #38, dated 4/8/24, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status was scored at a 13 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. It documented the resident was taking antidepressant medication. It documented that diagnoses for this resident included depression and anxiety. A Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status was scored at 13 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. A Pharmacist's Report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility document review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a process in place to allow consistent access to resident funds outside of business hours for five of five residents who participated in the trust fund (Resident #11, #12, #27, #28, and #40). The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: Review of a document provided by the facility titled Residents who use the trust, undated, revealed the following residents utilized the trust fund: Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #27, Resident #28, and Resident #40. On 5/1/24 at 3:12 PM, the facility's Business Office Manager (BOM) and Administrator queried as to how residents accessed their personal funds. The BOM responded if residents asked, she would give it to them. The Administrator acknowledged money had not been available 24 hours and would be moving forward. The Administrator further explained the facility had done some weekends, not really consistently, and there had been some access but not consistently. The Facility Policy titled Protection of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record review, and the facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate staffing to prevent a fall with injury; answer call lights in a timely manner; provide feeding and bathing assistance; and provide a bed pan to a resident before an incontinent accident for 6 of 19 residents (Residents #10, #12, #19, #28, #46, #207). The facility census 58 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 scored a 12 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS revealed Resident #19 used a wheelchair and dependent with toilet transfer and transfer to the chair/bed to chair. The Care Plan revealed a focus area dated 3/10/22 for required assistance with ADLs (activities of daily living) due to recent right shoulder surgery with need for immobilizer. The interventions revised on 2/15/24 revealed resident utilized an sit to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, menu review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 18 of 18 residents receiving a mechanical soft diet received the correct meal portion and failed to ensure 6 of 6 residents receiving a pureed diet received food in accordance to the menu. The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: The Week 2 Tuesday Menu directed staff to serve residents receiving a mechanical soft diet 1 serving of beans and ground franks, soft garlic bread, and 4 ounces of vegetables. The menu directed staff to serve residents receiving a pureed diet 1 serving of pureed beans and franks, 1 serving of pureed garlic bread, and 1 serving of pureed vegetables. On 4/30/24 at 9:45 a.m., the Dietary Manager cut 19 hot dogs into chunks and processed them to a ground consistency. She then measured the volume as 8 cups and walked over to a chart on the wall and stated she would use a #10 scoop. She transferred the hot dogs into a pan and added 19 scoops of baked beans. She did not then measure the total volume of the hot dogs and the beans. The noon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility document review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain adequate kitchen sanitation and failed to follow infection control measures to prevent cross contamination during food service for 1 of 1 meal observed. The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings: The initial kitchen tour on 4/29/24 at 9:30 a.m., revealed the following concerns: a. Staff B Dietary Aide washed dishes using the dish washing machine. Upon request, Staff A [NAME] ran the machine again. The wash temperature gauge on the side of the machine read 108 degrees Fahrenheit. Staff A then ran the machine a second time and the wash temperature gauge read 108 degrees Fahrenheit. A sign on the side of the machine stated the minimum wash temperature should reach 155 degrees Fahrenheit. The Dietary Manager stated the facility did not have any strips to test the functioning of the machine and stated she could not remember the last time they had the strips. b. The water in the hand washing sink cold to the touch. Staff A stated this just started today and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience when a resident was not provided assistance timely during two meal observations and was not assisted timely after the resident spilled water on themselves for one of two residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #12). The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #12 dated 3/28/24 revealed the resident scored 2 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented the resident independent for eating. The Dietary assessment dated [DATE], noted to be the same day as the resident's MDS, revealed the resident required set up assist and encouragement/cues. The Comments section documented, she is able to feed herself after set-up and utilizes weighted silverware; staff may provide occasional PRN (as needed) assist. Observation of Resident #12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to individualize the physical space of a resident's bathroom in order to ensure the resident maintained independent functioning, dignity, and well-being for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident #16). The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 2/13/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #16 which included acquired absence of the left leg above the knee, pain in the right shoulder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The MDS stated the resident required supervision or touching assistance for oral hygiene and listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 14 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. A 4/19/21 Care Plan entry stated the resident able to complete oral hygiene independently and took care of his dentures himself. The resident's Census List stated he moved to his current room on 12/5/23. A 12/7/23 Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Resident Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record review, and the facility policy, the facility failed to supply the resident with a menu that provided him options for the meals for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for choices (Resident #10). The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 scored a 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition intact. The MDS revealed resident needed set up and clean up assistance only for eating. The Care Plan revealed a focus area revised on 3/29/24 for a nutritional problem related to his multiple sclerosis, paraplegia, osteoarthritis, diabetes mellitus, vitamin D deficiency, depression, urinary incontinence, hypertension, and obesity. The interventions revised on 11/10/23 revealed a general with ground meat and thin liquid diet and honored food preferences/special requests as able. The Physician Orders revealed a regular/general…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify 1 of 3 Medicare Part A beneficiaries of coverage ending (Resident#8). The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings: The Beneficiary Notice-Residents discharged With the Last Six Months form, collected upon survey entrance, stated Resident #8 discharged from Medicare Part A on 1/19/24. Via email correspondence on 5/2/24 at 8:44 a.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated the facility could not locate a discharge notice provided to Resident #8. She stated at the time of her discharge, the facility had a different Social Services Director. The facility policy Beneficiary Notices: Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advanced Beneficiaries Notice (ABN) and Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNOC), effective 4/15/18, stated the facility would notify beneficiaries when their skilled nursing services and/or therapy services would end and their right to request an appeal.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure staff's background checks completed prior to hire date for 1 of 5 staff; and failed to ensure the dependent adult abuse mandatory reporter training current for 1 of 5 staff reviewed (Staff C, and Staff D). The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: According to Staff C, RN (Registered Nurse) personnel file her date of hire was 10/26/23 and the Single Contract Repository (SING) completed on 4/29/24 at 2:57 PM. Staff D, CNA (Certified Nurse Aide), personnel file lacked documentation of the dependent adult abuse mandatory reporter training. Staff D date of hire was 11/8/22. During an interview on 5/2/24 at 2:22 PM, the Administrator queried on the expectations of the dependent adult abuse mandatory reporter being completed and he stated it needed to be current. The Administrator asked the expectations on background checks and he stated they needed done prior to the staff member being hired. The Facility Abuse Policy (no date indicated) revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) coding for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for medications (Residents #3, #18, #46) and for 1 of 1 residents reviewed with a catheter (Resident#11). The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: 1. The MDS assessment tool, dated 2/29/24, stated Resident #3 received an anticoagulant (a medication used to prevent blood clots). The February 2024 Medication Administration Record lacked documentation the resident received an anticoagulant. 2. The MDS assessment tool, dated 3/20/24, stated Resident #46 received an anticoagulant. The March 2024 Medication Administration Record lacked documentation the resident received an anticoagulant. On 5/2/24 at 12:37 p.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated MDS coding should be accurate. She stated her trainer directed her to code medications such as aspirin as an anticoagulant. On 5/2/24 at 4:03 p.m., the ADON stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician order, failed to ensure parameters present for insulin administration for when to hold scheduled insulin dosage, failed to ensure medication dosages consistently included as part of medication orders, and failed to ensure rinse and spit following administration of a steroid inhaler for three of five residents reviewed for professional standards (Resident #11, Resident #18, Resident #50). The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11 dated 3/21/24 revealed the resident scored 06 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated severely impaired cognition. Per this assessment the resident received insulin injections for 7 of the past 7 days. Review of the Care Plan dated 1/24/21, revised 4/23/24, revealed the following: Resident #11 is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, resident interviews, clinical record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADL) including eating assistance, nail care, shaving, and showers consistently completed for three of four residents reviewed for ADLs (Resident #12, #28, and #29). The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #29 dated 2/2/24 revealed the resident scored 15 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated intact cognition. Per this assessment, self care for shower/bathing marked not applicable. The Care Plan dated 1/6/22 revised 4/29/24 revealed, Resident #29 has a self-care deficit due to impaired mobility with dx (diagnosis) of quadriplegia, protein calorie malnutrition/severe, anemia, hypotension, polyneuropathy, neurogenic bladder & bowel, vertigo, R) BKA (below knee amputation), insomnia, muscle spasms to back,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, clinical record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure catheter tubing remained off the floor, failed to accurately assess a resident for the presence of a catheter, and failed to ensure timely orders for an indwelling catheter for two of two residents reviewed for catheters (Resident #11, Resident #19). The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11 dated 3/21/24 revealed the resident scored 6 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The assessment further revealed Resident #11 was always incontinent for urinary continence and did not have an indwelling catheter. The admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed per the urinary continence section that Resident #11 always continent. The option for an indwelling catheter was not selected. The Narrative Notes section at the bottom of the assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the resident didn't have two active orders for the same opioid medication for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for pain (Resident #208). The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Finding include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #209 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition intact. The MDS revealed diagnosis for multiple sclerosis. The MDS revealed one Stage 2 pressure ulcer, one Stage 3 pressure ulcer, and one Stage 4 pressure ulcer present on admission. The MDS revealed resident took opioids. The Care Plan revealed a focus area dated 4/12/24 for multiple sclerosis and at risk for a decline in current activities of daily living (ADL) self-performance level and injuries due to increased weakness, pain, fatigue, and impaired coordination. The Care Plan revealed a focus area dated 4/23/24 for Stage 4 pressure ulcer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 scored a 6 out of 15 on the BIMS exam, which indicated cognition severely impaired. The MDS revealed the resident received an antidepressant. The MDS revealed a diagnosis of depression. The Care Plan revealed a focus area revised on 10/27/23 for a diagnosis of depression and resident received medication for the disease process. The interventions dated 2/3/22 revealed administration of an antidepressant medication as ordered by the primary care provider (PCP). The interventions dated 1/22/24 revealed antidepressant medication decreased by PCP/GDR (gradual dose reduction); observe for signs/symptoms of increased depression and notify PCP as needed. The Physician Orders revealed the following orders: a. Duloxetine 20 mg (milligram)- give 2 tablets- ordered on 5/8/23 and discontinued on 1/20/24 b. Duloxetine 30 mg- give 1 tablet- ordered on 1/23/24 The Pharmacist's Recommendation to Prescriber dated 11/2/24 revealed Resident #13 took Duloxetine 40 mg once…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, resident interviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to offer bedtime snacks to 2 of 2 residents who desired bedtime snacks (Residents #28 and #46). The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: 1. The 2/21/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 2/21/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #28 which included depression, diabetes, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 4/29/24 at approximately 1:00 p.m., Resident #28 stated staff did not offer him bedtime snacks. He stated he would like staff to offer him a snack. The Documentation Survey Report for April 2024 listed an entry for Snacks at 7:00 p.m. The following dates were blank or stated NA-Not Applicable and lacked documentation staff offered the resident a snack: 4/7/24, 4/8/24, 4/9/24, 4/11/24, 4/13/24, 4/15/24, 4/16/24, 4/18/24, 4/19/24, 4/20/24, 4/21/24, 4/24/24, 4/25/24, 4/26/24, 4/29/24, 4/30/24. 2. The MDS assessment tool, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-25 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and provider interview, the facility failed to pay it's waste management providers resulting in delayed and absent pick up. The facility reported census was 50 residents. Findings include: During an observation on 3/12/24 at 12:30 p.m. there were four full dumpster's of waste sitting on the facility premises. Three containers belonged to Provider A and one container belonged to Provider C. During an observation on 3/18/24 at 11:55 a.m. three dumpster's belonging to Provider A remain full with yellow tape wrapped around them. Provider C's dumpster had been emptied and an additional dumpster was now on the property. In an interview on 3/13/24 at 3:33 p.m. Provider B, owner/operator, stated the facility had been using multiple waste management companies due to failing to pay for services timely and in full. Provider B stated he was the third waste management provider he knows of and stopped picking up his dumpster's in November 2023 due to nonpayment. In an interview on 3/7/24 at 3:51 p.m. Provider A, owner/operator, stated he had been providing waste pick up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews, facility policy review, and Centers for Disease Control information the facility failed to follow proper infection control practices to mitigate the risk for the spread of infectious disease. The facility reported a resident census of 50 residents. Findings include: According to an infection control log for January 2024, the facility had a COVID outbreak beginning on 1/7/24 and ending on 1/21/24 involving 27 residents. During that time frame 13 staff tested positive for COVID 19 and 11 staff were permitted to work prior to conventional return to work criteria being met. The following website for the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/guidance-risk-assessment-hcp.html included updated guidance as of September 23, 2022. The Interim Guidance for Managing Healthcare Personnel with a respiratory disease called coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) (SARS-CoV-2) Infection or Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 included the following return to work criteria; a. Healthcare Personnel (HCP) who were asymptomatic throughout…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, food temperatures during food services, and resident interviews, the facility failed to serve food within appropriate temperature ranges, with consistently adequate flavoring and in an attractive and palatable manner throughout 4 observed meals. Facility reported census was 50 residents. Findings include: During an observation on 3/18/24 at 11:55 a.m. a sample tray was provided which included baked ziti pasta, garlic toast, salad, and fruit cocktail. The food was good but slightly cool. The food had good flavoring and seasoning. There was only one entree with no alternative option prepared. In an interview on 3/18/24 at 11:55 a.m. Staff G, cook, stated the menu was for spaghetti, but the food order had not arrived so she substituted with ziti pasta instead. According to the week 4 menu, mandarin oranges were on the menu and not served. In an interview on 3/18/24 at 12:30 p.m. Resident #13 was sitting in the dining room with several peers eating lunch. Resident #13 was asked about meals and he stated they were good enough to keep you from starving, but they are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents treated in a dignified manner and value the resident's right to choose to stay in bed for breakfast and still be allowed to go outside and smoke for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident's rights (Resident #8). The facility reported a census of 60. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 scored 15 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition intact. The MDS revealed the resident required extensive assistance with two plus person assist for bed mobility and transfers and needed extensive assistance with one person physical assist for locomotion off the unit. The Care Plan identified a focus area dated 10/9/23 as follows: the resident preferred to smoke while at the facility and currently did not want a smoking cessation program. During an interview on 10/9/23 at 12:33 PM, Staff C, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to update the Care Plan and fall interventions for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #2, Resident #4, and Resident #5). The facility reported a census of 60. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 scored a 3 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS revealed the resident required extensive assistance with 2 plus person physical assist for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toilet use. The MDS documented the resident required total dependence with bathing self performance and the bathing support provided required 2 plus person physical assistance. The MDS revealed since last prior assessment 2 or more falls with no injury and 2 or more falls with injury without major injury occurred. The Care Plan revealed a focus area initiated on 6/20/23 for risk of falls related to impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to adequately supervise a resident in a shower chair after transferred to his room which lead to the resident falling out of the shower chair for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 60. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that Resident #2 scored a 3 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS revealed the resident required extensive assistance with 2 plus person physical assist for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toilet use. The MDS revealed resident total dependence with bathing self performance and the bathing support provided required 2 plus person physical assistance. The MDS indicated since last prior assessment 2 or more falls with no injury and 2 or more falls with injury without major injury. The MDS documented the resident had diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide incontinence cares for 1 of 4 residents reviewed who were unable to carry out the activity independently. (Resident #3) The facility reported census was 53. Findings include: According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 5/11/23, Resident #3 had long- and short-term memory deficits and a severely impaired cognitive status. Resident #3 required extensive assistance of two staff with mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs. Resident #3 was coded as always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident #3's diagnosis included Alzheimer's, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, diabetes mellitus, seizure disorder and schizophrenia. Resident #3's Plan Of Care indicated a problem with self care deficit and need for physical assistance with toileting with interventions which included assistance of two to toilet and provide peri cares after each incontinent episode. In an interview on 7/24/23 at 1:04 p.m. Staff B, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-09-16 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and Pre-admission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) level 2 review, the facility failed to resubmit short stay approval PASRR level 2 within the appropriate time frame for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for PASRR. The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. MDS indicated Resident #16 had fluctuations of disorganized thinking and intermittent behavioral symptoms, not directed towards others. Resident #16 required partial to moderate amount of staff assistance with cares and mobility. Diagnoses included Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, and Dependent Personality Disorder. The MDS revealed goal for discharge to return to the community. The Care Plan, revised [DATE], listed the Director of Social Services as responsible to contact local providers prior to time limited PASRR determination…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-05-02 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, review of CMS-2567 reports, and facility QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) Plan, the facility failed to ensure an effective QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) process to address previously identified quality deficiencies, resulting in multiple repeat deficiencies identified on the facility's current recertification and complaint survey previously identified during surveys completed in the last 19 months. The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: a. The CMS-2567 form from a recertification survey dated 8/29/22 to 9/1/22 revealed the facility issued a deficient practice for dignity, professional standards not met, and food procurement, store/prepare/serve and sanitation with no actual harm level citation. b. Review of the facility's CMS-2567 form from a complaint survey which occurred 7/20/23 to 8/2/22 revealed the facility received a harm level for accident hazards/supervision, and a no actual harm level citation for activities of daily living/maintain abilities. c. The CMS-2567 form from a complaint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-05-02 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility document review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a surety bond in place to cover the total amount of personal funds in the resident trust account for five of five residents who utilized the trust fund (Resident #11, #12, #27, #28, and #40). The facility reported a census of 58 residents. Findings include: Review of a document provided by the facility titled Residents who use the trust, undated, revealed the following residents utilized the trust fund: Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #27, Resident #28, and Resident #40. Review of a Surety Bond provided by the facility dated 6/23/23 revealed Surety Bond amount of $40,000.00. On 5/02/24 at 2:16 PM the facility's Administrator queried about total amount of resident funds, and responded with an amount which exceeded the facility's Surety Bond. The Facility Policy titled Protection of Resident Funds, undated, revealed, 2. If the facility accepts financial responsibility for the resident's financial affairs the resident or resident's responsible person shall designate, in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-10-11 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, the plan of correction and review of CMS-2567 reports, the facility failed to ensure an effective QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) process to address previously identified quality deficiencies, resulting in repeat deficiencies identified on the facility's current revisit and complaint survey previously identified during surveys completed in the last fourteen months. The facility reported a census of 60 residents. Findings include: The CMS-2567 form from a recertification survey dated 8/29/22 to 9/1/22 revealed the facility issued a deficient practice for no actual harm level citation for development and implementation of comprehensive care plans. The Plan of Correction dated 10/21/22 revealed the following information: a. Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plans b. Care plans have been reviewed and developed to be comprehensive for each resident. c. Staff education regarding comprehensive care plans. Review of the facility's CMS-2567 form from a complaint survey which occurred 7/20/23 to 8/2/23 revealed the facility received a an actual harm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-08-02 · tag F0573 — patternLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure requests for medical records are provided within two working days of the request for 2 of 2 records reviewed. (Resident #1, #2) The facility reported census was 53. Findings include: According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 5/17/23, Resident #1 had long- and short-term memory deficits and a severely impaired cognitive status. Resident #1 required extensive to total dependence of two staff with mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs and a diagnosis, which included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia According to an Authorization to Release Healthcare Information dated 6/13/23, Resident #1's daughter requested medical records, interdisciplinary team notes and doctors orders from 2019 to present. In an interview on 8/2/23 at 2:33 p.m. Resident #1's daughter stated she had requested Resident #1's medical records on 6/14/23 with the current facility Administrator at that time, Staff T. After not hearing anything back, on 6/19/23 she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$59,150 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $59,150 — penalty dated 2024-05-02
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-04 for 4 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CEDAR VIEW HOLDINGS — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 2.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMARANTHINE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/01/2025 |
| CEDAR VIEW HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| CEDAR VIEW TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| IOWA 5784 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| SAMARA FAM TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| SAMARA FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| SEBBAG, GABRIEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| BRECOUNT, DANA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| MALLETT, CALLA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| GREATOREX, TINA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/28/2026 |
| SCHIOWITZ, MARC | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/28/2026 |
| GAMZEH, DAVID | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| 819 COUNTRY LANE ROAD PROPCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| CARESAGE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| CLINICAL CONSULTING SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| JSJ 2020 FAM TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| JSJ FAMILY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| JSJ PROPERTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| SUMMATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| THE BRYN MAWR TRUST COMPANY OF DELAWARE | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $158K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165204. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.