Stone Cottage Care Center
900 South Stone Street, Sigourney, IA 52591 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 41 certified beds · (641) 622-2971 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606, F0609) — most recent Sep 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (69) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $18,682 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-25)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.7% | 17.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.2% | 4.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 1.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 2.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.1% | 4.2% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.3% | 3.8% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 26.1% | 16.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 33.3% | 20.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 78.6% | 95.3% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.3% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.1% | 25.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 25.9% | 19.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.1% | 2.1% | 1.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 41 beds and averages 33.4 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
69 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 56 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, record review, facility investigation review and facility policy review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse that occurred on 11/10/23 which alleged staff member pushed and threatened Resident #3. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of November 10, 2023 on November 27, 2023 at 3:45 PM. The facility staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on November 28, 2023 at 3:10 PM by implementing the following actions: a. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff A was suspended on 11/20/23 b. All staff education began on 11/27/23 by the Administrator c. Upon notification to the regional team, re-education was immediately to the Administrator on reporting allegations of abuse and neglect beginning 11/27/23 at 7:13 PM d. Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) was re-educated on abuse and neglect policies, included identification and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff and resident responsible party interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and staff assistance to residents to prevent injuries from falls, for 1 of 4 residents with fall histories reviewed (Resident #4). The facility's failure to provide the appropriate supervision and assistance resulted in Resident #4's hospitalization in a hospital Intensive Care Unit with injuries that included hemothorax, fractured 6th through 10th right ribs, displaced right shoulder and compression fracture of the 10th thoracic vertebrae that resulted from an unwitnessed fall. The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Findings include:The 9/13/25 modified Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment revealed Resident #4 had diagnoses that included repeated falls, Wernicke's encephalopathy (a severe neuropsychiatric disorder caused by thiamine deficiency), alcohol dependence with withdrawal delirium, arthritis, irritability and anger, scored 8 out of 15 points possible on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) cognitive assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents receive adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. (Resident #2) The facility reported census was 26. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 8/24/23, documented that Resident #2 had impaired long and short term memory deficits and a severely impaired cognitive status. Resident #2 required extensive assistance of two staff members with transfers, mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs. The MDS documented that Resident #2's diagnoses including, Alzheimer's disease, and depression. According to Resident #2's Plan of Care, she has a self care deficit requiring total assistance for all cares, feeding and transfers with interventions which include use of a Hoyer lift and two person assist with all transfers. On 9/20/23 at 10:51 a.m. Staff B, Nurse Aide in Training (NAT), stated she was an aide in training and was shadowing Staff C Certified Nurses Aide (CNA). Staff B, Staff C and Staff D (CNA) were getting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain the dignity for one of three residents reviewed (Resident #8) when they failed to ensure to keep him from sitting in his own stool for hours before staff provided incontinence cares and failed to treat him with dignity and respect by using profanity. The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #8 as cognitively intact with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 and had the following diagnoses: Traumatic Spinal Cord Dysfunction, Quadriplegia, Neurogenic Bladder and Diabetes Mellitus. The MDS also identified Resident #8 to be totally dependent on staff for assistance with all activities of daily living which included personal hygiene, dressing, eating, transfer from chair to bed. The MDS documented that the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. On 5/14/26, the Care Plan identified Resident #8 with the problem of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to provide oral cares to one of three residents reviewed (Resident #6) and failed to provide peri cares for one of three residents reviewed (Resident #8). The facility reported a census of 35 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool with reference date 2/19/26 revealed Resident #6 admitted to the facility 11/14/25 with diagnoses that included quadriplegia, seizure disorder, anxiety, depression, asthma, skin graft failure and stage 4 pressure ulcer, scored 15 out of 15 points possible on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) cognitive assessment, that indicated intact cognition and without symptoms of delirium present, always able to make himself understood and always able to understand others. The assessment revealed the resident had deficits of bilateral upper and lower extremities, totally dependent on staff assistance for all cares that included repositioning in bed, transfers to and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to separate 2 residents (Resident's #11 and #12) from one another after one of the residents made verbal threats that she would hit the resident, and subsequently observed behind the resident with her arm raised in the air as if to strike the resident. As a result of the failure to separate the residents, Resident #11 was able to strike Resident #12 in the head in the dining room during the breakfast meal, at a time when staff were in the area and could have taken action to prevent it. Resident #12 sustained a bruise on her face and requested transfer to another facility. The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool with reference date 4/16/26 revealed Resident #11 had diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes, anxiety, asthma and insomnia, scored 14 out of 15 points possible on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) cognitive assessment, that indicated intact cognition, without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to answer call lights timely for two of three residents reviewed (Residents #6 reported he had to wait at least 30 minutes to get his call light answered 3 to 4 times a week and Resident #8 reported to has to wait over an hour to get his call light answered on a daily basis). The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool with reference date 2/19/26 revealed Resident #6 admitted to the facility 11/14/25 with diagnoses that included quadriplegia, seizure disorder, anxiety, depression, asthma, skin graft failure and stage 4 pressure ulcer, scored 15 out of 15 points possible on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) cognitive assessment, that indicated intact cognition and without symptoms of delirium present, always able to make himself understood and always able to understand others. The assessment revealed the resident had deficits of bilateral upper and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interview the facility failed to provide occupational therapy for one ofone residents reviewed for occupational therapy services. (Resident#8). The facility reported a resident census of 35. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #8 as cognitively intact with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 and had the following diagnoses: Traumatic Spinal Cord Dysfunction, Quadriplegia, Neurogenic Bladder and Diabetes Mellitus. The MDS also identified Resident #8 to be totally dependent on staff for assistance with all activities of daily living and had an indwelling urinary catheter. A review of the Physician Orders revealed an order dated 11/6/25 for Occupational Therapy to evaluate and treat as ordered. A review of Occupational Therapy progress notes revealed the last entry was dated 4/2/26. The Care Plan with the last revision date of 3/4/26 identified Resident #8 with the problem of being a quadriplegic,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review. The facility failed to provide 2 of 2 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #5) reviewed for accommodation of needs, with an effective call light system to meet the needs of residents who have both upper and lower extremity impairments. The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/04/25, revealed that Resident #2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] from another Nursing Home. Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The list of diagnoses included quadriplegia (loss of movement and sensation, affecting all four limbs and torso) and Diabetes Mellitus. The MDS identified that Resident #2 had been dependent on staff assistance for all care tasks, hygiene tasks, and for all mobility. Resident #2 had an indwelling urinary catheter and was always incontinent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff and resident interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to answer resident call lights in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for call lights, when the resident reported waiting for assistance took greater than 15 minutes. The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/04/25, revealed that Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The list of diagnoses included quadriplegia (loss of movement and sensation, affecting all four limbs and torso) and Diabetes Mellitus. The MDS identified that Resident #2 had been dependent on staff assistance for all care tasks, hygiene tasks, and for all mobility. Resident #2 had an indwelling urinary catheter and was always incontinent (unable to control) both bowel and bladder functions. Review of the Care Plan, date initiated 12/17/25, revealed a Focus area for activities of daily living (ADL) self care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on professional certification review and staff interviews, the facility failed to employ a qualified person to serve as the Dietary Manager in the absence of a full-time dietitian. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include:As of 9/2/25, the facility lacked documentation that Staff E Dietary Manager(DM) completed the Certified Dietary Manager(CDM) course.On 9/3/25 at 11:00 a.m., Staff E stated she did not complete the CDM course. She stated she started in August 2025 and would finish in December 2025. On 9/4/25 at 12:27 p.m., the Administrator stated the DM should be certified. She stated she was enrolled last year but did not finish and was currently in the course again. She stated she did not have a policy regarding DM qualifications.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement(QAPI) meeting documentation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain documentation that the facility carried out Quality Assurance(QA) activities to develop, implement and evaluate corrective actions or performance improvement activities and take action to conduct structured, systematic investigations, analysis of underlying causes or contributing factors of problems affecting facility-wide processes that impact quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety. The facility reported a census of 30 residents.Findings include:The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services(CMS) 2567, dated 9/26/24, listed, in part, the following concerns from a Recertification Survey, and Complaint investigations: F658, F695, F801, F865, F887.The CMS 2567, dated 3/24/25, listed, in part, the following concerns from an investigation of a Facility Reported Incident: F550The current survey, conducted 9/2/25-9/4/25, also identified the above concerns (see F550, F658, F695, F801, F865 and F887). On 9/4/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident interviews, resident council minutes, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure resident needs were met in a timely manner. During the survey 4 of 5 residents reviewed for call lights (Residents #6, #8, #11, #12) reported waiting as long as 90 minutes for call lights to be answered. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include:1) The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #6 dated 8/23/25 documented diagnoses of epilepsy, schizophrenia, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and repeated falls. The resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was recorded as 15/15 which indicated intact cognition. Section GG documented the resident needed set up assistance with lower body dressing and substantial to maximal assistance with bathing and tub/shower transfers. The resident was marked as frequently incontinent. On 9/2/25 at 4:01 PM the resident stated sometimes she spent a half an hour or more waiting for help to use the bathroom or get cleaned up. She reported it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 56 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to interact with a resident in a respectful manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity(Resident #26). The facility reported a census of 30 residents.Findings:The Quarterly Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 7/17/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #26 which included heart failure, diabetes, and hemiplegia(one-sided paralysis) and listed her Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Care Plan entries, dated 8/19/25, stated the resident had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and directed staff to administer aerosol or bronchodilators(medications that treated breathing conditions) as ordered. On 9/4/25 at approximately 8:45 a.m., Staff A Certified Medication Assistant(CMA) provided the resident her Symbicort inhaler(a medication inhaled which helped with breathing conditions) and the resident inhaled 2 puffs. After this, Staff A provided the resident a glass of water and the resident swished her mouth and swallowed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interivew, the facility failed to ensure a resident rinsed their mouth in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for the administration of an inhaler(Resident #26). The faciltiy reported a census of 30 residents. Findings:The Quarterly Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 7/17/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #26 which included heart failure, diabetes, and hemiplegia(one-sided paralysis)and listed her Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The facility policy Provision of Physician Ordered Services, dated 12/23, stated the purpose of the policy was to provide physician ordered services according to professional standards of quality. The September 2025 Medication Administration Record(MAR) listed a 3/24/22 order for Symbicort Aerosol 160-4.5 micrograms[mcg] (budesonide-formoterol fumarate, an inhaler which treats lung conditions) 2 puffs twice daily. The MAR directed staff to ensure the resident rinsed their mouth with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of a resident's refusal of an ordered diet and failed to carry out specialized Speech Therapy(ST) services for a diagnoses of dysphagia(difficulty swallowing) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for a change in condition(Resident #10). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include:The Quarterly Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 8/16/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #10 which included dysphagia(difficulty swallowing), Parkinson's disease(a disease which caused tremors and lack of mobility), and anxiety disorder. The MDS stated the resident had a mechanically altered diet and listed his Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The facility policy Provision of Physician Ordered Services dated 12/23, stated the facility would provide a reliable process for the proper and consistent provision of physician ordered services according to professional standards of quality. A 7/16/25 5:40 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to adequately supervise a resident after they went outside without oxygen for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for elopement (Resident #22). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 scored a 8 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition moderately impaired. The MDS revealed medical diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The MDS indicated the resident utilized oxygen therapy. The Care plan revealed a focus area revised on 11/13/24 for a diagnosis of COPD and is at risk for shortness of breath, impaired breathing and respiratory infections and utilizes O2. The interventions dated 7/9/24 indicated to administer supplemental oxygen (02) as ordered per physician. The Care Plan revealed a focus area revised on 11/13/24 for impaired cognitive function and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to verify oxygen orders with the hospice provider for 1 of 1 residents reviewed oxygen therapy orders (Resident #22). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 scored a 8 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition moderately impaired. The MDS revealed medical diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The MDS indicated resident utilized oxygen therapy. The Care plan revealed a focus area revised on 11/13/24 for a diagnosis of COPD and is at risk for shortness of breath, impaired breathing and respiratory infections and utilizes O2. The interventions dated 7/9/24 indicated to administer supplemental oxygen (02) as ordered per physician. The EMR revealed the following Physician Orders: a. ordered 4/8/25- Oxygen via nasal canula (n/c) 1-5L as needed (PRN) to keep oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5%. The facility's medication error rate calculated as 7%. The facility reported a census of 30 residents.Findings include:The Annual Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 7/10/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #8 which included anxiety, hemiplegia(paralysis affecting one side of the body), and paraplegia(paralysis affecting the lower body) and listed her Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. A Care Plan entry, revised 2/1/24, stated the resident was a smoker.The September 2025 Medication Administration Record(MAR) listed the following orders:a . 7/21/25 Famotidine(a medication used to reduce stomach acid) tablet 20 milligrams(mg) two times per day.b. 7/16/25 nicotine patch(assisted in nicotine cessation) 24 hour 14 mg/hour 1 patch one time a day. On 9/3/25 at 8:16 a.m., Staff A Certified Medication Assistant(CMA) administered Resident #8's morning medications. Staff A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to administer a resident their prescribed controlled medication for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #17). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 scored a 10 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, which indicated cognition moderately impaired. The MDS revealed diagnoses for anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and seizure disorder or epilepsy. The MDS indicated the resident prescribed antipsychotics, antianxiety, and antidepressant medications. The Care Plan revealed a focus area revised on 9/3/25 for use of antianxiety medications related to a seizure disorder. The interventions dated 9/3/25 directed staff to give the resident anti-anxiety medications as ordered by the physician.The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed the following Physician Orders: a. Ativan Oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to offer a Covid-19 booster to 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations(Resident #3) and failed to provide information to staff regarding the Covid-19 vaccination. Findings included:1. The Annual Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 6/19/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #3 which included hemiplegia(one-sided weakness), mild intellectual disabilities, and muscle weakness and listed her Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident's Iowa Health and Human Services vaccination list, stated the resident received a Covid-19 vaccination on 6/27/24. The facility lacked further documentation of education provided to the resident regarding an updated Covid-19 booster. 2. On 9/4/25 at approximately 11:00 a.m., Staff F Laundry Staff stated the facility did not provide information to her regarding Covid-19 vaccinations. On 9/4/25 approximately 1:00 p.m. Staff G Housekeeping staff stated the facility did not provide information to her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right of choice and self determination regarding their health care needs for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident #1) The facility reported census was 26. Findings include: According the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 2/20/24, Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated a moderately impaired cognitive status. Resident #1 required maximal assistance with transfers, mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs. Resident #1 was coded as always incontinent of bladder and continent bowel. Resident #1's diagnosis included cerebrovascular accident (stroke), hemiplegia, renal insufficiency and seizure disorder. In an interview on 3/20/25 at 1:33 p.m Staff B, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), stated she was working an overnight shift on 1/20/25. It was after 10:00 p.m. and she and Staff E, CNA, had just cleaned and prepared Resident #1 for bed and had exited his room when Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), approached…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-31 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff and family interview, the facility failed to ensure that the transfer or discharge met all documentation requirements necessary for a safe and effective transition of care for one of four residents reviewed. (Resident #1) The facility reported census was 25. Findings include: According to a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 7/12/24, Resident #1 had short- and long-term memory deficits and severely impaired cognitive status for daily decision making. Resident #1 required maximal to dependent assistance with transfers, mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs. Resident #1 was always incontinent of bladder and was frequently incontinent of bowel. Resident #1's diagnosis included cerebrovascular accident (stroke), hemiplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In an interview on 12/31/24 at 12:57 p.m. Staff B, Social Worker, stated the discharge process involving Resident #1 lasted 6 months. There was a facility located which seemed a better fit as they could provide a day program. Staff B stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-31 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff and family interview, the facility failed to provide adequate notice of discharge in writing and proper contents of notice, including a statement of the resident's appeal rights prior to discharge for one of four. (Resident #1) The facility reported census was 25. Findings include: According to a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 7/12/24, Resident #1 had short- and long-term memory deficits and severely impaired cognitive status for daily decision making. Resident #1 required maximal to dependent assistance with transfers, mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs. Resident #1 was always incontinent of bladder and was frequently incontinent of bowel. Resident #1's diagnosis included cerebrovascular accident (stroke), hemiplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In an interview on 12/31/24 at 12:57 p.m. Staff B, Social Worker, stated the discharge process involving Resident #1 lasted 6 months. There was a facility located which seemed a better fit as they could provide a day program. Staff B stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to employ a qualified person to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services in the absence of a full-time dietitian. The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: The facility policy Dietary Services Administration effective 3/2015, stated if a dietician was not employed full time, the facility would designate a person to serve as the Director of Food Service who received frequently scheduled consultations from a qualified dietician. The facility would designate a person to serve as the Food Services Director who was a qualified dietitian, a graduate of dietetic technician or dietetic assistant training program or, a graduate of a state-approved course that provided 90 or more hours of classroom instruction in food service supervision and who had experience as a Food Service Supervisor in a health care institution. On 9/23/24 at 9:29 a.m. the Dietary Manager stated she was not a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), but stated she was in the course. She stated she could not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain adequate sanitation for 2 of 2 kitchen observations and failed to carry out sanitary food handling during 1 of 1 meal service observation. The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings: The initial kitchen tour, conduced on 9/23/24 at 9:29 a.m., revealed the following concerns: a. Dust particles hung from the 3 spigots of the fire suppression system over the stove. An observation of the noon meal service on 9/24/24 at 11:30 a.m. revealed the following concerns: a. Dust remained on the spigots of the fire suppression systems. A long dust string extended from the bottom of one of the spigots to the horizontal fire suppression pipe. b. [NAME] splatters on the inside floor of the microwave with brown solid food debris on the inside of the door. Yellow and brown solid food debris was present on the front of the microwave near the door opener. The outside of the microwave was sticky to the touch. c. Thick dust…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolatedNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on employee file review, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to conduct a record check evaluation prior to employment to indicate clearance for work for 1 of 5 employee files reviewed. The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: The untitled facility staff roster listed a hire date for Staff B Registered Nurse(RN) as 9/11/23. An 8/30/23 Single Contact License and Background Check(SING) stated a Criminal History(CCH) record was found and the results would be faxed. The facility lacked further documentation regarding Staff B's CCH and lacked documentation of a record check evaluation completed to indicate she could work at the facility. On 9/25/24 at 2:22 p.m., the Business Office Manager(BOM) stated the facility could not locate the record check evaluation for Staff B and stated she thought they would receive a citation for this. She stated this should be completed prior to hire. On 9/25/24 at 3:30 p.m. the Administrator stated they initiated a background check for Staff B and she was off the schedule until Friday. She stated background…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to include fall interventions for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with a history of falls (Resident #21), failed to address nutrition needs for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for weight loss (Resident #21), and failed to address a resident's history of sexual behaviors toward other residents/staff for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for resident-to-resident interactions (Resident #12). The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: 1. The 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 7/17/24, listed Resident #21's admission date as 7/10/24 with the diagnoses of stroke, shortness of breath, and diabetes. The MDS stated the resident had a fall within the last month prior to admission and stated the resident required substantial/maximal assistance for chair transfers, toilet transfers. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 9 out of 15, which indicated moderately impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an insulin vial discarded after it was opened past 28 days for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for insulin administration (Resident #5). The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 revealed 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated cognition intact. The MDS revealed a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM). The MDS revealed the resident received insulin for 7 out of 7 days. The Care Plan revealed a focus area dated 12/13/24 for DM I/II and at risk for frequent infections, alternation of skin, visual impairment, hyper/hypoglycemia, renal failure and cognitive/physical impairments. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed a Medical Diagnosis for Type II DM without complications The EMR revealed the following Physician Orders: a. Lantus Subcutaneous Solution 100 units/ml (milliliters)-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to recognize and address weight fluctuations for a resident at risk of impaired nutrition for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for weight loss(Resident #21). The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 7/17/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #21 which included stroke, shortness of breath, and diabetes and listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 9 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The facility policy Nutrition (Impaired)/Unplanned Weight Loss-Clinical Protocol, revised September 2017, stated nursing staff would monitor and document weights of residents and would report significant weight loses to the physician. The staff and physician identified pertinent interventions based on identified causes. A 7/9/24 hospital Registered Dietician note stated the resident had inadequate energy intake due to a decreased ability to consume sufficient energy evidenced by weight loss and insufficient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's oxygen tank was available for use for 1 of 1 residents reviewed receiving oxygen therapy (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 6/27/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #3 which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a disease of the lungs which caused shortness of breath and difficulty breathing), diabetes, and pain in an unspecified joint. The MDS stated the resident had shortness of breath with exertion (such as walking) and when lying flat. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 10 out of 15, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The facility policy Oxygen Administration, revised October 2010, directed staff to set up oxygen for residents who received oxygen therapy. A 4/12/24 Order Details report listed an order for oxygen 1 liter as needed to keep oxygen greater than 90%. Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain (Resident #15) received treatment and care related to pain management. The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 6/20/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #15 which included non-Alzheimer's dementia, diabetes, and hypertension. The MDS stated the resident had frequent pain over the last 5 days and listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 12 out of 15, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented that for the 5 day MDS look back period the resident did not receive any as needed (PRN) pain medication, or non-medication intervention for pain, only scheduled pain medication. The facility policy Pain Management revised 2015, stated pain management was an essential component of health care and directed staff to recognize when the resident was experiencing pain and manage or prevent pain. The policy directed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to screen residents for eligibility and/or failed to document refusals for the pneumococcal vaccines for 3 of 5 residents reviewed. (Resident #5, Resident #7, and Resident #12). The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: 1. The Review of Resident #5 EMR (Electronic Medical Record) Immunization Record revealed no documentation of the resident receiving a pneumococcal vaccine. The Review of Iowa Registry Immunization System (IRIS) revealed the resident received the pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine (PCV13) on 10/27/15. The facility lacked documentation the resident received/offered/declined any other pneumococcal vaccines. 2. The Review of Resident #7 EMR Immunization Record revealed the resident received PCV13 on 11/13/15. The Review of IRIS revealed the resident received the pneumococcal 23 vaccine on 9/2/14. The facility lacked documentation the resident offered/declined any additional pneumococcal vaccines. 3. The Review of Resident #12 EMR Immunization Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to screen residents for eligibility of the COVID-19 vaccines and/or failed to document refusal or acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccines for three of five residents reviewed. (Resident #5, Resident #7, and Resident #12) ) The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: 1. The Review of Resident #5 EMR (Electronic Medical Record) Immunization Record revealed the resident refused a COVID-19 vaccine (no date documented). The Review of Iowa Registry Immunization System (IRIS) revealed the resident received the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine on 12/29/22. The facility lacked documentation the resident received/offered/declined any other COVID-19 vaccines. 2. The Review of Resident #7 EMR Immunization Record revealed the resident received Moderna COVID-19 booster on 10/11/23. The Review of IRIS revealed the resident received the Moderna COVID-19 on 10/11/23. The facility lacked documentation the resident offered/declined any additional COVID-19 vaccines. During an interview on 9/26/24 08:30 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect by failing to assist a resident with positioning in a dignified manner (Resident #1), failing to avoid roughness during incontinence cares (Resident #5), failing to speak to residents in a dignified manner and ensure confidentiality (Resident #5), and failing to engage with residents during the provision of cares (Resident #9) for 3 of 11 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility reported a census of 23 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 4/18/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #1 which included severe intellectual disabilities, conduct disorder, and disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (a condition characterized by ongoing irritability, anger, and frequent, intense temper outbursts). The MDS documented the resident exhibited physical behavioral symptoms directed toward others such as hitting, kicking, pushing, and grabbing which occurred on 4-6 days during the 7 day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident (Resident #4) from being pinched by another resident (Resident #1) on 4/17/24 with a history of physical aggression for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility reported a census of 23 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 4/18/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #1 which included severe intellectual disabilities, conduct disorder, and disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (a condition characterized by ongoing irritability, anger, and frequent, intense temper outbursts). The MDS stated the resident exhibited physical behavioral symptoms directed toward others such as hitting, kicking, pushing, and grabbing which occurred on 4-6 days during the 7 day review period and listed her cognition as severely impaired. A 3/22/23 Incident Audit Report stated another resident (Resident #15) yelled ow stop and the resident (#1) swatted toward the resident. The staff member did not witness contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency when a staff member failed to treat a resident with dignity and respect during positioning (Resident #1) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for an allegation of abuse. The facility reported a census of 23 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 4/18/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #1 which included severe intellectual disabilities, conduct disorder, and disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (a condition characterized by ongoing irritability, anger, and frequent, intense temper outbursts). The MDS stated the resident exhibited physical behavioral symptoms directed toward others such as hitting, kicking, pushing, and grabbing which occurred on 4-6 days during the 7-day review period and listed her cognition as severely impaired. A 3/28/23 Care Plan entry stated the resident was comforted by being on the floor and may position herself on the floor for comfort. An untitled facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation and ensure immediate protection for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for an allegation of abuse (Resident #1) from a staff member and for an allegation of abuse from a fellow resident (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 23 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 4/18/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #1 which included severe intellectual disabilities, conduct disorder, and disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (a condition characterized by ongoing irritability, anger, and frequent, intense temper outbursts). The MDS stated the resident exhibited physical behavioral symptoms directed toward others such as hitting, kicking, pushing, and grabbing which occurred on 4-6 days during the 7-day review period and listed her cognition as severely impaired. a. A 3/28/23 Care Plan entry stated the resident was comforted by being on the floor and may position herself on the floor for comfort. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to adequately supervise a resident (Resident #3) in order to protect another resident's personal privacy (Resident #1) for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for supervision. The facility reported a census of 23 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 4/18/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #1 which included severe intellectual disabilities, conduct disorder, and disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (a condition characterized by ongoing irritability, anger, and frequent, intense temper outbursts). The MDS listed her cognition as severely impaired. The facility policy, Resident Rights, revised October 2022, stated residents had the right to privacy. A 12/5/23 Nurses Note stated the resident refused to keep clothes on. The Care Plan intervention dated 12/6/23 documented Resident #1 often disrobes and to allow her privacy to do so. A 12/19/23 Nurses Notes stated the resident refused staff assistance to put on a brief and pants. A 12/27/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolatedEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff with skill sets to care for a cognitively impaired resident who required 1:1 supervision (Resident #1) and a resident with behaviors affecting others (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 23 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 4/18/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #1 which included severe intellectual disabilities, conduct disorder, and disruptive mood dysregulation disorder. The MDS stated the resident exhibited physical behavioral symptoms directed toward others such as hitting, kicking, pushing, and grabbing which occurred on 4-6 days during the 7 day review period and listed her cognition as severely impaired. A 3/28/23 Care Plan entry stated the resident was comforted by being on the floor and may position herself on the floor for comfort. An untitled documented, referred to by the Director of Nursing (DON) as a Walking Care Plan and updated 2/14/24, directed staff to provide the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to carry out quality assurance (QA) activities in order to address problem-prone areas and create a plan for improvement. The facility reported a census of 23 residents. Findings: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) 2567, dated 6/29/23, listed the following concerns: F550, F609, F610. The CMS 2567, dated 11/30/23, listed the following concerns: F550, F609. The CMS 2567, dated 1/25/24, listed the following concerns: F689. Review of facility QA activities for the period of 1/1/24-5/19/24 revealed a 2/28/24 QA Committee sheet with the topic of all Plan of Correction (POC) tags. The QA documentation lacked further documentation related to the above concern areas including data collection, monitoring, audits, input from staff, and performance indicators. The facility lacked documentation the QA committee systematically identified, reported, tracked, investigated, analyzed and or utilized data to develop activities to prevent future adverse events. The current survey, conducted from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain sufficient nursing staff to enable relief for scheduled nurses upon completion of their 12 hour shift, 4 times between 1/9/24 and 1/22/24, that required the nurse on duty to work in excess of 24 consecutive hours on 2 of the 4 dates, and the facility could not identify a plan for the future that would provide 100 percent certainty that the scheduled nurse on duty would have relief after their completed shift, if the scheduled relief staff failed to come to work. The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings include: The facility's nursing schedule revealed the following: 1/9/24 Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) scheduled to work from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. Staff F, LPN, scheduled to work from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. 1/12/24 Staff J, Registered Nurse (RN) scheduled to work from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. Staff H, Agency LPN, scheduled to work from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. 1/13/24 Staff H, LPN, scheduled to work from 6 a.m. to 11 a.m. Staff F, LPN, scheduled to work from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. Staff G, RN,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the required 8 consecutive hours of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on 4 dates between 1/10/24 and 1/25/24. The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings include: The facility's nursing schedule revealed the following: 1/12/24 Staff J, Registered Nurse (RN) scheduled to work from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., but called off due to weather. Staff H, Agency LPN, scheduled to work from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. 1/14/24 Staff F, LPN, scheduled to work from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. Staff N, LPN, scheduled to work from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. 1/18/24 Staff F, LPN, scheduled to work from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. Staff F, LPN, scheduled to work from 6 p.m. to 2 a.m. Staff H, Agency LPN, scheduled to work from 2 a.m. to 8 a.m. 1/21/24 Staff F, LPN, scheduled to work from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. Staff F, LPN, scheduled to work from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. Payroll records between 1/10/24 and 1/25/24 revealed the following: Staff G, RN worked: 1/10/24 1/11/24 1/13/24 1/15/24 1/16/24 1/17/24 1/19/24 1/20/24 1/23/24 1/24/24 The Director of Nursing (DON) worked as a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow directives as ordered and mandated in Level II PASRR assessments, and failed to submit a new PASRR assessment when a 90 day conditional Level II PASRR expired, for 2 of 2 resident's reviewed with Level II PASRR's (Resident's #1 and #4). The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had diagnoses that included cerebral palsy, hemiplegia (paralysis on 1 side of the body), seizure disorder, conduct disorder, autistic disorder and severe intellectual disability, had severe cognitive impairment, rarely/never able to make herself understood or able to understand others, unable to speak, and had impaired vision not corrected by eye-glasses. The assessment documented the resident required maximal staff assistance to transfer from bed to chair, bathing, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene, unable to stand or ambulate, and had physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility policy, and staff and resident responsible party interviews, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan that addressed specific safety needs of a resident, for 1 of 5 resident records reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool dated 10/26/23 revealed Resident #1 had diagnoses that included cerebral palsy, hemiplegia (paralysis on 1 side of the body), seizure disorder, conduct disorder, autistic disorder and severe intellectual disability, had severe cognitive impairment, rarely/never able to make herself understood or able to understand others, unable to speak, and had impaired vision not corrected by eye-glasses. The assessment revealed the resident required maximal staff assistance to transfer from bed to chair, bathing, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene, unable to stand or ambulate, and had physical behaviors directed at others, and other behaviors not directed at others, that occurred from 1 to 3 days of the 7 days that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders for wound care, and failed to ensure documentation was accurate and not falsified, for 1 of 5 resident records reviewed (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool dated 11/9/23 revealed Resident #3 had diagnoses that included diabetes, non-Alzheimer's dementia and back pain, had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented that the resident required extensive staff assistance for transfers to and from bed and chair, dressing, toileting, bathing and personal hygiene. Wound care orders directed by the physician included: 12/31/23 Paint left hallux (great toe) with Betadine (antiseptic solution) daily. 12/31/23 Cleanse left heel with Wound Cleanser, apply skin prep to peri wound, collagen pad to wound bed, cover with gauze and gauze wrap daily and as needed. 1/15/24 Paint right hallux and 2nd toe with Betadine twice daily. Review of the resident's January, 2024 Medication Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff and resident responsible party interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to promote resident safety and prevent a resident to resident incident that resulted in an injury, for 2 of 5 resident records reviewed (Resident's #1 and #2). The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool dated 10/26/23 revealed Resident #1 had diagnoses that included cerebral palsy, hemiplegia (paralysis on 1 side of the body), seizure disorder, conduct disorder, autistic disorder and severe intellectual disability, had severe cognitive impairment, rarely/never able to make herself understood or able to understand others, unable to speak, and had impaired vision not corrected by eye-glasses. The assessment revealed the resident required maximal staff assistance to transfer from bed to chair, bathing, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene, unable to stand or ambulate, and had physical behaviors directed at others,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, resident interviews, and record review the facility failed to have sufficient Registered Nurse (RN) coverage at least 8 consecutive hours a day for 8 of 37 days reviewed. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include: A staffing document titled December revealed there was no RN coverage December 3rd, 4th, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th, 13th, or 19th. No additional coverage documentation was provided. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented that Resident#2 had scored a 15 out of 15 for the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated intact cognitive status. On 1/7/24 at 12:47 PM Resident #2 stated that most of the nursing staff who work with him are Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), not RN. On 1/8/24 at 8:31 a.m. Staff A, Scheduler reported if both staff are listed as an LPN on the staffing document then they were unable to find RN coverage for that day either internally or from the agencies. The Director of Nursing (DON) at the time was on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to maintain equipment and to prepare foods under sanitary conditions for 3 of 3 kitchen observations. The facility failed to repair the sanitizing triple sink, the Handwashing sink, and the cooking sink in a timely manner. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include: Observation on 1/7/24 at 11:11 AM were made in the kitchen as follows; a. The kitchen handwashing sink with a sign not to use it. b. In the clean side of the kitchen, a second sink was backed up on both sides with 3 inches of cloudy yellow liquid, an oily layer, and piles of a light ground up substance. c. The 3-section sanitizer sink was taped off and marked not to use. d. One sink remained in the clean prep area. e. The dishwashing area held a rented dish machine and one sink. f. The Dietary supervisor was in the food preparation area without a hair net. His baseball cap left 3 inches of hair uncovered. Observation on 1/9/24 at 11:13 AM in the kitchen as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-10 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Resident Council documentation, resident interviews, and staff interviews the facility failed to thoroughly act on grievances voiced in resident council for 2 of 2 months reviewed. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include: The Resident Council Meeting Summary dated 11/23/23 documented 14 of 25 residents attended. The follow up section noted the facility was working on smoking times and places from the last meeting. New meeting concerns included Certified Nurse's Aides (CNA's) bothered nurses too much on the weekends. A document titled Resident Meeting Nov. 29th concerns indicated residents reported issues of smoking hours and CNA's on the weekends bothering nursing. A document titled Resident Meeting Concerns 12/23 documented as follows; new nurses needed someone here to help them, residents needed rooms cleaned and trash picked up on the weekend, and more linens in their rooms. The Resident Council Meeting Summary dated 12/21/23 documented 15 of 27 residents attended. New…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-10 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to provide ready access to personal funds managed by the facility for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #3) and failed to provide quarterly statements for 11 of 11 residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #3 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicative of intact cognition. The MDS indicated that it is very important for the resident to do his favorite activities, and go outside when the weather is good. The MDS documented the resident had diagnoses including Schizophrenia, Anxiety, and Bipolar Disorder. The Care Plan for Resident #3 last reviewed on 12/12/23 failed to reveal documentation regarding a Personal Funds Account with the facility. A section related to his mental health revised on 12/12/23 indicated smoking was an intervention to calm his anxiety. A document titled Trust Transaction History dated July 1, 2023 to January 9, 2024 included documentation for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe environment with scheduled cleaning identified by visible carpet stains made by urine, blood, and feces which left noticeable odors in a resident room, the North hall, and a common television area near the dining room. The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include: On 1/7/24 at 11:21 AM an observation of the common area and North hallway revealed 10 stains of various sizes on the carpet. The front half of the hallway and into the common area smelled strongly of urine. The hall remained accessible to residents and four residents sat in the common area with the television on. During a continuous observation on 1/8/24 from 11:25 AM to 11:42 AM, multiple North hallway residents walked and rolled through the affected areas. The nurse was located at the nursing cart which sat in the common area near the entrance to the North hall. The urine smell and the stains remained. On 1/9/24 at 12:18 PM an environmental tour of the building revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the acuity needs of the facility's resident population for 3 of 5 residents reviewed (Residents #1, #2, and #3). The facility reported a census of 28. 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1 dated 10/26/23 documented diagnoses of cerebral palsy, quadriplegia, and disruptive mood dysregulation disorder. MDS Section C documented an inability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicative of severely impaired cognition. Section GG indicated the resident was always incontinent; dependent for toilet, tub, and chair transfers; and needed substantial/maximal assistance with toileting, bathing, and dressing. A Care Plan intervention initiated 12/20/23 indicated a poor awareness of personal care and health needs. A focus area revised 5/30/23 indicated the resident disrobed, tore her incontinence brief, and tried to eat it. A focus area revised 1/5/24 indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and policy review the facility failed to complete an assessment for 1 of 4 (Resident #5) residents who smoked. The facility reported a census of 28. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #5 dated 10/19/23 documented diagnoses of Barrett's Esophagus without dysphasia (risk of esophageal cancer), heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. MDS Section C documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13, indicative of intact cognition. Progress notes labeled Nurses Note, dated 12/16/23 and 12/20/23, documented the resident went out to smoke. A Care Plan with an admission date of 7/21/23 failed to include smoking goals or interventions. An observation on 1/7/24 at 1:28 PM included Resident #5 exiting the front door with another resident to smoke. They went to the designated area in resident parking and returned. On 1/9/24 at 4:26 PM observed the resident attempted to make it to the smoking area with his walker. The snow was too deep and he returned to the building. On 1/9/24 at 3:30 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, record review, facility investigation review, and facility policy review the facility failed to treat 1 of 3 residents reviewed with dignity. (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 28. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] listed diagnoses for Resident #3 included unspecified dementia, seizure disorder, anxiety, depression, respiratory and heart disease. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment scored 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Functional ability section revealed Resident #3 independent with sit to stand, transferring and walking at least one-hundred fifty (150) feet. The Care Plan initiated 05/24/23 documented Resident #3 potential to be verbally aggressive, cursing, resistance to care, and name calling related to ineffective coping skills and poor impulse control. Interventions included to intervene before agitation escalates, guide away from source of distress, engage calmly in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, resident/family interview and record review the facility failed to ensure safe transport of resident in a wheelchair for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 28. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #2 dated 8/22/23 revealed resident scored 04 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented diagnoses including Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) referring to recent stroke, contracture of right foot, contracture of muscle in right upper arm. The MDS documented unclear speech. Resident #2 coded for extensive physical assistance, referenced resident involved in the activity and staff provide weight bearing support for transfers, bed mobility, locomotion on and off the unit, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. The MDS revealed resident used wheelchair for mobility. The Care plan updated 8/22/23 documented Resident#2 had right side paralysis from CVA and aphasia (language disorder affects communication can occur…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review and policy review, the facility failed to treat residents with divinity and respect for 5 of 5 residents reviewed (Residents #2, #5, #11, #18 & #24). The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #11 had diagnoses which included stroke, Parkinson's, diabetes mellitus, obesity. The MDS revealed that the resident required the assistance of 2 persons for bed mobility and toileting. Resident #11 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated an intact cognition. The Care Plan dated [DATE] directed staff to as follows; to adopt an accepting and consistent approach with Resident #11, do not avoid or overwhelm the resident, and maintain a safe environment for the. During an Interview on [DATE] at 9:47 AM Resident #11 stated Staff H, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) treated me like crap and she said what do you want! Resident #11 stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review and policy review, the facility failed to report suspicion of verbal abuse and neglect affecting the psychosocial well being for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #5, #11, #18, #24). The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #11 had diagnoses including stroke, Parkinson's, diabetes mellitus, and obesity. The MDS revealed the resident required the assistance of 2 persons for bed mobility and toileting. Resident #11 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated an intact cognition. The Care Plan dated [DATE] directed staff to adopt an accepting and consistent approach with Resident #11, do not avoid or overwhelm the resident, and maintain a safe environment for the resident. During an Interview on [DATE] at 9:47 AM Resident #11 stated Staff H, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) treated me like crap and said, what do you want! Resident #11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review and policy review, the facility failed to take action to investigate alleged violation of abuse to prevent further neglect and mistreatment of 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #5, #11, #18, #24). The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #11 revealed a diagnosis of a stroke, Parkinson's, diabetes mellitus, obesity and required the assistance of 2 persons for bed mobility and toileting. Resident #11 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 suggesting an intact cognition. The Care Plan dated [DATE] directed staff to adopt an accepting and consistent approach with Resident #11, do not avoid or overwhelm, and maintain a safe environment. During an Interview on [DATE] at 9:47 AM Resident #11 stated Staff H, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) treated me like crap and said, what do you want! Resident #11 stated she would turn on the call light to recieve care and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to store and prepare foods under sanitary conditions for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: 1. The initial kitchen observation on 06/26/23 at 9:52 AM revealed the following: A. Expired food items, located in the dry storage room: 1. mushrooms, expired 11/30/22 2. cinnamon streusel coffee cake mix, expired 12/29/22 3. enchilada sauce, expired 1/10/23 4. devil's food cake mix, expired 3/26/23 5. muffin mix, expired 6/8/23 6. lays chips, expired 6/6/23 7. tostitos chips, expired 6/20/23 B. The green detergent bucket was sitting in the sink with a rag in it. The sanitizing bucket was empty and dry. C. Food temperature testing logs for 6/24/23 dinner were not complete and the log for 6/25/23 was empty. 2. The second kitchen observation on 06/27/23 revealed the following: A. At 11:28 AM, observed Staff F, Dietary Aide, puree 2 sandwiches, coleslaw, and banana bread. The sandwich temperature was 55 degrees and placed on ice to cool. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0836 — patternEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure timely assessment and submission of veteran status (state law requirement) for 4 of 5 residents (Residents #6, #20, #24, and #176). The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: The facility admissions report for the survey year listed the following: Resident #6, admitted [DATE] Resident #20, admitted [DATE] Resident #24, admitted [DATE] Resident #176, admitted [DATE] The facility lacked documentation of VA Eligibility checks upon admission for the above residents. During an interview 06/28/23 at 3:08 PM, the Administrator confirmed some of the VA documentation was missing. During an email correspondence dated 6/29/23 at 9:16 AM, Staff D, Social Services, indicated there is no documentation for Resident #176. During email correspondence dated 6/29/23 at 11:19 AM, the Administrator stated they are unable to find the Veteran ' s policy.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Quality Assurance(QA) signature sheets, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure it held quarterly QA meetings throughout the survey year. The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the CMS 2567 form dated 4/7/22 revealed, in part, deficiencies identified with notifications related to resident's discharging from skilled services, care plan revision, accidents, and kitchen sanitation. The current survey, completed 6/29/23 also identified concerns with the above areas. Review of the CMS 2567 form, dated 12/29/22, revealed, in part, deficiencies identified with staff dignity concerns. The current survey, completed 6/29/23 also identified concerns with the above area. A 3/13/23 facility Dietary: Kitchen sanitation documented a checklist related to proper kitchen sanitation. A 3/15/23 facility document Accidents documented a checklist related to the management of falls, elopements, and injuries such as skin tears, bruises, and burns. The facility lacked further documentation related to the identification and correction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on Quality Assurance(QA) signature sheets, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure it held quarterly QA meetings throughout the survey year. The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings Include: The facility policy QAPI(Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) Plan, dated 1/1/23, stated the committee would meet regularly to discus Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) and progress. A QA Meeting Signature Sheet listed attendees of a QA meeting on 3/15/23. The facility lacked documentation of additional QA meetings held during the survey year from 4/7/22-6/26/23. In email correspondence, sent on 6/27/23 at 1:02 p.m., the Administrator documented he could not locate additional QA documentation. On 6/29/23 at 12:42 p.m., the Administrator stated the facility should conduct QA meetings quarterly.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to document the reason for discharge from skilled services, the date of notification of Medicare Non-Coverage, and/or appeal decisions for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for completed Medicare services (Residents #176, #177, and #178). The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: 1. The Beneficiary Notice-Residents discharged Within the Last Six Months form documented Resident #176 discharged from Medicare Part A on 1/4/23. The facility lacked documentation that the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN) or the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was completed. The MDS for End of PPS Part A Stay indicated that Resident #176 was discharged from Medicare A coverage on 1/4/23 with return not anticipated. The clinical record lacked documentation of discharge planning, ABN and NOMNC completion, and information regarding ability to appeal. 2. The Beneficiary Notice-Residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to carry out a root cause analysis and implement care plan interventions in order to prevent falls for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for falls(Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 5/18/23, listed diagnoses for Resident #2 which included anxiety, depression, and osteoarthritis(pain in the bones and joints). The MDS documented the resident required extensive assistance of 1 staff for transfers and walking and revealed the resident was not steady and only able to stabilize with staff assistance when moving from a seated to a standing position, walking, turning around and facing the opposite direction while walking, moving on and off the toilet, and transferring between the bed and chair or wheelchair. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. On 6/26/23 at 10:40 a.m., Resident #2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to carry out a root cause analysis and implement interventions in order to prevent falls for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for falls(Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 5/18/23, listed diagnoses for Resident #2 which included anxiety, depression, and osteoarthritis(pain in the bones and joints). The MDS documented the resident required extensive assistance of 1 staff for transfers and walking and stated the resident was not steady and only able to stabilize with staff assistance when moving from a seated to a standing position, walking, turning around and facing the opposite direction while walking, moving on and off the toilet, and transferring between the bed and chair or wheelchair. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 6/26/23 at 10:40 a.m., Resident #2 stated that she fell…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to complete and post daily staffing that included name, date, census, number of staff, and hours worked for licensed and non-licensed staff. The facility reported a census of 22. Findings include: An observation on 06/26/23 at 12:06 PM revealed a posting area in the main lobby. The posting was dated 6/25/23. A binder on the same table, included previous documents showing posting gaps from 5/29/23 to 6/2/23, 6/4/23 to 6/7/23, 6/9/23, and 6/13/23 to 6/22/23. An observation on 06/27/23 at 08:00 AM showed a posting dated 6/26/23. An observation on 06/28/23 at 08:22 AM confirmed the daily posting remained 6/26/23. An interview on 06/26/23 at 12:06 PM with Staff G, Business Officer Manager/Human Resources, clarified that this is the only staff posting area. An interview on 06/26/23 at 12:15PM with the Administrator indicated that documents were completed at 6:00 AM daily with the charge nurse for posting.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to document attempts of non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for prn psychotropic medications(Resident #13). The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 5/30/23, listed diagnoses for Resident #13 which included non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The facility policy Psychotropic Drug Use F 757 F758 effective 1/2023, directed staff to identify and note nonpharmacological approaches as an alternative to or an adjunct to prn psychotropic use. Care Plan entries, dated 5/29/23, directed staff to intervene before agitation escalated, guide away from the source of distress, engage calmly in conversation, and provide positive feedback for good behavior. The June…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-09-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, review of CMS-2567 reports, and facility QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) Plan, the facility failed to ensure an effective QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) process to address previously identified quality deficiencies, resulting in multiple repeat deficiencies identified on the facility's current recertification and complaint survey previously identified during surveys completed in the last 17 months. The facility reported a census of 22 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's CMS-2567 form from the last recertification's survey which occurred on 6/26/23 to 6/29/24 revealed the facility received no actual harm level citations for care plan revision and food procurement, and QAPI good faith. Review of the facility's CMS-2567 form from a complaint survey which occurred 12/28/23 to 1/10/24 revealed the facility received a no actual harm level citation for food procurement. During an interview on 9/26/24 at 1:03 PM, the Administrator queried on how the facility made sure it stayed in substantial compliance after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$18,682 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $18,682 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-12-05 for 29 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-31 for 112 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CEDAR VIEW HOLDINGS — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMARANTHINE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/01/2025 |
| CEDAR VIEW HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| IOWA 5784 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| SAMARA FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| SEBBAG, GABRIEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| CASE, JANELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| MILLER, DANIEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| GAMZEH, DAVID | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/07/2025 |
| GREATOREX, TINA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/20/2025 |
| SCHIOWITZ, MARC | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/20/2025 |
| 900 S STONE STREET PROPCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| CARESAGE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| CLINICAL CONSULTING SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| JSJ 2020 FAM TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| JSJ PROPERTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| SAMARA FAM TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| SUMMATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| THE BRYN MAWR TRUST COMPANY OF DELAWARE | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $75K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165381. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.