No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Royal Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

4614 NW 84th Street, Urbandale, IA 50322 · For profit - Corporation · 115 certified beds · (515) 270-6838 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Jul 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$434,825 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (78) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $434,825 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-11)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
8779 Northpark Dr · (515) 270-1000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.2 mi
4600 86th St · (515) 252-7355 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
8450 Meredith Dr · (515) 270-1325 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(515) 278-3900 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.0%17.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.9%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%1.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%2.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.2%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.7%3.8%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.3%16.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.0%20.8%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.7%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%4.2%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.5%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.8%19.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.7%2.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine60.3%73.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.9%20.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.0%13.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.211.491.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.302.081.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
39.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 39.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.4%CMS range 43.6–66.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 7.4–16.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge39.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge42.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge39.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay5.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 2.5–11.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
0.66
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.49
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.63
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
66.7%
Total nursing turnover
90.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 87.2 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-20)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-01)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

78 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 60 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-10-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, official city records, facility policy review, and guidance from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the facility failed to provide necessary nursing coverage for approximately four hours on two nursing units housing a total of 53 residents, after one of two on duty nurses left the facility unscheduled. During this period of time, the facility failed to provide requested medications to three residents (Res #3, #6, #9). As a result, one resident's pain (Res #3) became so severe that she contacted 911 (emergency services) to obtain assistance with receiving her pain medication. Additionally, the facility failed to assess another resident (Res #6), who had a documented history of multiple anaphylactic reactions requiring intubation, when she reported symptoms of an allergic reaction.On 10/14/25 at 10:10 am, the State Survey Agency informed the facility the failure to assess the residents, provide needed medications, and take action to ensure resident care and safety needs were met created an Immediate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice as they allowed the Unit Managers/Supervisors to draw up liquid Morphine (pain medication) and Lorazepam (anti-anxiety medication) in one (1) milliliter (ml) syringes and placed them labeled and unlabeled in the medication carts 3 residents (Res #8, #11 and #13). The staff that drew up the medications failed to dispense the medications and were not licensed pharmacists. The facility also failed to provide sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation and drug records in order to account for all controlled drugs. (Res #2 and #13) The facility identified a census of 83 residents. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of November 11, 2024 at 3:21 p.m. The Facility Staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on November 22, 2024 through the following actions: a. Assessment of all medication carts and treatment carts for assurance all medications and treatment ointments/creams and etc.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, hospital record review, staff, medical provider and vendor interviews, and guidance from the 2025 Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to take steps necessary to avoid the development and worsening of a pressure ulcer for one of four (Resident #8) residents reviewed. This resulted in harm to Resident #8 when her wound continued to worsen and she was sent to the hospital for wound management on [DATE]. Upon admission to the hospital, Resident #8 was diagnosed with a sacral decubitus ulceration extending to the bone. She was additionally diagnosed with an MRSA infection (Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, an antibiotic-resistant infection. It causes dangerous infections when it enters the body and doesn't respond to standard medications) of the wound on [DATE]. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: The RAI manual details the following definitions: STAGE 1 PRESSURE INJURYAn…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, consultant pharmacy interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete routine urinary catheter care, monitor urinary output and administer an antibiotic to treat an urinary tract infection (UTI) per physician order for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #11) reviewed for urinary catheter. Resident #1 did not receive a full nine-day course of antibiotics to treat an UTI which resulted in a hospitalization. The facility reported a census of 88 residents Findings include: 1.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment completed on 11/19/25 revealed Resident #11 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. Diagnoses include multiple sclerosis and neurogenic bladder (bladder dysfunction contributing to incontinence). The MDS confirmed the use of a urinary catheter. The Care Plan, last revised 6/3/25, documented the following; the resident was at risk for urinary tract infections, also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, hospital record review, resident and staff interviews, facility education review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure safety during transfers for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #61). This failure caused harm when Resident #61 was improperly transferred in the shower room, resulting in a fall with two fractures. These fractures caused the resident to have an increase in pain, a need for increased pain management and a decrease in her ability to transfer. During observations of other residents, the facility additionally failed to properly use a full body mechanical lift in a safe manner and per manufacturer's instructions for Residents #4, #17 and #39. The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings Include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #61 dated 3/13/25 identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 15 which indicated cognition intact. The MDS coded the resident required partial/moderate assistance to move from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family and staff interviews, resident record review, and policy review, the facility failed to verify resident identity to ensure accurate resident antipsychotic medications were ordered upon admission for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (#56). The facility failed to identify the discrepancy which prevented Resident #56 from receiving antipsychotic medications for two (2) weeks. This resulted in psychosocial harm to Resident #56 due to exacerbation of psychosis, agitation, antipsychotic medication withdrawal symptoms, and subsequent hospitalization with a worsening sacral pressure ulcer. The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Finding include: On 5/13/25, Resident #56 indicated she believed she had been hospitalized but wasn't sure. On 5/13/25 at 12:00 PM, Resident #56's family member verified Resident #56 transferred from another Long-Term Care (LTC) facility on 4/17/25. She stated a facility staff member contacted her on 5/01/25 and reported Resident #56 looked out of it. She also stated when she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, provider interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for pressure ulcers received care and services to prevent pressure ulcers from forming while resided at the facility. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment identifies the definition of pressure ulcers: Stage I is an intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence. Darkly pigmented skin may not have a visible blanching; in dark skin tones only it may appear with persistent blue or purple hues. Stage II is partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough (dead tissue, usually cream or yellow in color). May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister. Stage III Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident who needed respiratory care was provided oxygen for a doctor's appointment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen use (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 had diagnoses of heart failure, breast cancer, and seizures. The MDS documented the resident had severely impaired cognition. The MDS indicated the resident had shortness of breath when lying flat and used oxygen. The Care Plan revised on 8/7/23 revealed Resident #4 on oxygen therapy related to a respiratory illness. The staff directives included to apply oxygen as ordered. The Order Summary Report revealed an order started on 8/4/23 for continuous oxygen at 2-4 liters (L) per nasal cannula (NC) to keep oxygen greater than 88 % (percent), and monitor oxygen every shift. The Treatment Administration Record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-11 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 2567's, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to have an effective QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) process to address previously identified quality deficiencies to assist in the provision of quality care for residents and attain substantial compliance with Federal regulations and State rules. The facility had repeat deficiencies identified on the facility's recertification revisit and complaints survey. The facility identified a census of 81 residents.Findings include: Review of the Department of Inspections, Appeals and Licensing (DIAL) website under the facility's visit history revealed repeated deficient practices identified during the facility's recertification survey completed 5/20/25, complaint investigations 5/20/25, 2/11/26, 4/9/26 and the current revisit survey and complaint investigations. The repeat deficiencies cited included: F760 cited 5/20/25 and 4/9/26F880 cited 5/20/25, 2/11/26, 4/9/26 and during the current surveyIn an interview on 6/2/26 at 1:10 PM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility investigation summary report, resident and staff interview and policy review the facility staff failed to provide care for a resident in an environment that maintained or enhanced dignity for one of six residents sampled that required assistance (Residents #1). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of a colostomy and an ileostomy. The MDS documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated the resident had dependence on staff for toileting and had a surgical wound.The Care Plan initiated 4/9/26 and revised 4/16/26 revealed the resident had a colostomy and ileostomy related to an ileus (a temporary slowdown or stoppage of intestinal movement). The Care Plan directed staff to change the bag after each bowel episode or when the bag was full, and to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, hospital record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing supervision for two out of five (Resident #3 and Resident #15) residents reviewed for nursing supervision by failing to provide one person assistance to Resident #3, resulting in the resident eloping from the building. The facility additionally failed to provide staff accompaniment to an off site physician's office visit for a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #15). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment of Resident #3 dated 5/14/26 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the resident exhibited wandering daily during the look-back period, placing the resident at significant risk of getting to a potentially dangerous place (e.g., stairs, outside of the facility). The MDS documented an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care within the time frames established in the comprehensive care plan and failed to maintain infection control standards during the provision of incontinence care for one of three (Res #18) residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 81 residents.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment of Res. #18 dated 4/29/26 identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated cognition intact. The MDS documented the resident to be always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Care Plan of Res. #18 documented a Focus Area of requiring assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The Care Plan directed staff that Res. #18 does not use a toilet, bed pan or bed side commode. It further directed staff to assist with checking and changing of incontinence brief and providing peri-care (cleansing of the genital area and buttocks) with each incontinent episode and as necessary as the resident allows, date initiated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview and policy review the facility failed to provide medication as ordered by the physician after the resident admitted to the facility for one of four residents reviewed for medications (Resident #2). The facility staff also failed to prepare and administer medications to one resident at a time for two of five residents observed for medication pass (Resident #13 and #14). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: 1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), heart failure and anxiety disorder. The MDS documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The Care Plan initiated 3/25/26 revealed the resident had altered cardiovascular status related to CHF (congestive heart failure), pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure in the arteries of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure staff utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and infection control practices to prevent the potential spread of infection for 1 of 3 nursing units reviewed (100 Hall). Staff reached into their uniform pocket to obtain hand sanitizer and then placed the hand sanitizer back into their uniform pocket during the course of a treatment and dressing change for 1 of 3 residents observed for treatments (Resident # 8). The facility additionally failed to properly sanitize a full body mechanical lift after resident usage and properly sanitize a mattress which was pooled with urine. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: 1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 had diagnoses of Stage 4 pressure ulcer, quadriplegia and multiple sclerosis. The Care Plan revised 4/6/26 revealed Resident #8 had a Stage 4 pressure injury to her right buttock related to impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, staff, resident, and family member interviews, the facility failed to provide necessary assistance with eating and failed to implement ordered nutritional interventions to address significant weight loss for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #24 and Resident #28). Specifically, staff failed to assist residents during meals, leaving them with untouched food for extended periods, and failed to provide ordered supplements even as the residents experienced significant weight declines. The facility reported a census of 83 residents. Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with reference date 1/7/26 revealed Resident #24 had diagnoses that included non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety and abnormal weight loss, weight 135 pounds with mechanically altered diet provided. The resident required substantial staff assistance for all activities of daily living including eating, reposition in bed, transfer to and from bed or chair, dressing and hygiene, unable to stand or ambulate, cognition not assessed and symptoms of delirium…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide proper wound care for two of two residents reviewed with pressure ulcers and failed to document a total of 9 treatments for 3 different pressure ulcers for Resident #21 and failed to document a total of 7 treatments for 3 different wounds as being completed and failed to utilize proper infection control techniques while providing wound care to Resident #22. The facility reported a census of 83 residents. Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #21 as severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 2 and had the following diagnoses: Coronary Artery Disease, Heart Failure and Alzheimer's Disease. The MDS also identified Resident #21 to be totally dependent on staff for assistance with all activities of daily living except for eating. The MDS also identified Resident #21 with two unstageable pressure ulcers. A review of the Physician Orders revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had physician orders for urinary catheters for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for urinary catheters (Resident #25), and failed to ensure staff provided appropriate catheter care that included infection control precautions for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for urinary catheters (Resident's #25 and #27). The facility reported a census of 83 residents.Findings include:1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool with 1/07/26 reference date revealed Resident #27 had diagnoses that included obstructive uropathy, urinary tract infection, hemiplegia (paralysis on 1 side of the body), sepsis from unspecified organism, gross hematuria (blood in the urine) and bacteremia (infection in the blood). The assessment revealed a urinary catheter used for urination. The Care Plan for Resident #27 identified a focus with initiated date of 3/18/22 as follows; resident had a urinary catheter with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on direct observation, clinical record review, staff and resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect residents from significant medication errors by allowing residents who were not assessed as competent to self administer medication to do so, and by preparing and issuing medications to multiple residents simultaneous. This impacted two residents. (Resident #1, #16). The facility reported a census of 83 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), revealed his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of other clinical files for the resident revealed he did not have an order to self-administer medication. Review of Resident #16's MDS revealed her BIMS score was 15, indicating intact cognition. It revealed the following relevant diagnoses: Anemia, Hypertension (High blood pressure), heart failure, renal insufficiency (kidney disease), seizure disorder or epilepsy. Review of other clinical files for the resident showed she did not have an order to self-administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 60 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed follow proper isolation precautions for 4 of 4 residents reviewed and failed to put on (don) an isolation gown while providing catheter care and incontinence cares for Resident #11. The facility also failed to provide personal protective equipment (PPE) for two residents that required contact precautions for Parainfluenza Virus for Resident #17, and for Clostridium difficile for Resident #29. The facility additionally failed to don PPE prior to transferring Resident #27. The facility reported a census of 83 residents.1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool with 1/07/26 reference date revealed Resident #27 had diagnoses that included obstructive uropathy, urinary tract infection, hemiplegia (paralysis on 1 side of the body), sepsis from unspecified organism, gross hematuria (blood in the urine) and bacteremia (infection in the blood). The assessment revealed a urinary catheter used for urination. A physician order dated 3/16/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a home-like environment for residents due to persistent pungent odors throughout 2 of the 3 nursing units (Station 1 and Station 2). The facility reported a census of 88. Findings include: During an observation on 2/4/26 at 10:45 AM, an unpleasant strong odor was noted on the Station 2 nursing unit, especially near the shower room and the environmental service door. During an observation on 2/4/26 at 11:00 AM, a strong pungent odor was detected down the Station 1 nursing unit East hallway. It became stronger as one walked further down the hall. Approximately four hours later, at 2:00 PM, the same pungent odor was still present but not as strong.During an observation on 2/5/26 at 7:50 AM, a pungent odor was noted on the Station 1 nursing unit down the East hallway. There was evidence the facility attempted to combat the odor with the use of an air freshener. At 11:00 AM on this day, Staff O, Housekeeping Director, was seen using a deodorizing machine down the Station 1 East hallway. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control measures in order to prevent the spread of infection for 2 of 3 residents who received insulin(an injectable medication used to lower blood sugar) (Resident #6 and #14). The facility failed to ensure staff did not utilize multiple dose insulin pens for more than one resident. The facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene and change gloves before, during, and after resident cares for 2 of 5 residents observed for cares (Resident #7 and #11). The facility also failed to ensure staff followed infection control practices to protect against cross contamination and potential spread of infection for 2 of 3 residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP's) (Resident #7 and #11). The facility staff also failed to use a barrier when a catheter was emptied and failed to properly disinfect a graduate container after use for 1 of 3 residents observed for catheter care (Resident #7). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on electronic health record review (EHR), observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to supervise resident administration of medications for 1 or 4 residents reviewed for medications (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 88.Findings include:The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Diagnoses atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), anxiety, arthritis, depression, diabetes, edema, and high blood pressure.The Care Plan, last revised on 10/20/25, documented that Resident #4 was resistive to cares and had a history of refusing medications if they did not feel the medications were necessary. Interventions for staff include education for the resident of possible outcomes of not complying. The Care Plan lacked documentation that the resident could self-administer medications.The Medication Administration Record (MAR) directed staff to offer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #3). The facility staff failed to return a [NAME] Monitor in a timely manner to the vendor after resident use which delayed downloading and analysis of the heart monitor data, follow up with the physician, and the potential treatment required. The facility reported a census of 88 residents. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an inpatient psychiatric facility and had diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, hypertension, catatonic disorder, and major depressive disorder. The MDS revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, indicating cognition intact. The Inpatient Adult Psychiatry Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 admitted to the medical-psych unit for management of the severe catatonic, depressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility bath records, resident interviews, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to offer and provide resident bathing on a consistent basis for 3 of 5 resident reviewed for bathing (Resident #1, #3, and #5). The facility reported a census of 88. Findings include: Resident Council meeting minutes from 11/24/25 noted 6 residents voiced not receiving showers consistently. 1.The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment completed on 1/21/26 revealed Resident #5 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BMIS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Diagnoses include arthritis, chronic pain syndrome, and heart failure. The Care Plan, last updated on 1/29/26, noted Resident #5 requires staff assistance with bathing and showers. During an interview on 2/4/26 at 11:10 AM, Resident #5 reported going over two weeks in-between showers. On many occasions, a bath or shower was not offered. At one point, the resident had to ask about receiving a shower. Resident #5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on electronic health record review (EHR), staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete and document neurological exams (neuro-checks) and skin assessments for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for assessment and intervention (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 88. Findings include: The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment completed 10/9/25 reviewed Resident #2 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13, indicating intact cognition. Diagnoses included anxiety, aphasia (communication disorder), diabetes, heart failure, hemiplegia, and stroke. Resident #2 noted to be dependent on staff for all cares and transfers. The MDS documented two or more falls since prior assessment. Resident #2 at risk of developing pressure injuries and was reported with a diabetic foot wound and an open foot lesion. The Care Plan, last revised 10/17/25, reported Resident #2 with falls. Interventions include neuro-checks per facility policy. Due to self-care performance deficits, skin inspections are care planned. Staff directed to observe for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete follow up assessments following a fall for one of four residents (Res #18) reviewed for falls. Findings include:The Progress Note of Resident #18 dated 8/22/25 at 11:44 am, authored by Staff O, Registered Nurse noted IDT (interdisciplinary team) met to discuss fall on 8/21/25. RCA (root cause analysis) performed. Hoyer (full body mechanical lift) sling to be tucked into sides of wheelchair. Review of subsequent progress notes failed to reveal any fall follow up was completed for Resident #18. On 10/21/25 at 3:44 pm, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated no incident report could be located for Resident #18 for a fall on 8/21/25. She agreed there was no documentation in the resident record of staff having followed up with pain assessments, vital signs or neurological checks as is protocol when there is a resident fall. On 10/21/25 at 4:16 pm, Staff O, RN stated she recalled the fall on 8/21/25 was in the morning. She stated the nurse that was on duty that morning for Station 2, where Resident #18…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facilty failed to maintain complete medical records in accordance with professional standards for three of four residents reviewed (Res #1, #13, #18). Findings include: The Progress Note for Resident #1 dated 2/20/25 identified a witnessed fall and indicated neurological checks were initiated. Additional Progress Notes dated through 2/23/25 referenced continued neurological monitoring.Similarly, an Incident Report for Resident #13 dated 2/19/25 reported a fall. The corresponding Nursing Note dated 2/19/25 at 12:03AM documented neurological checks were initiated at the time of the fall. On 10/20/25 at 10:58 am, the Administrator stated the facility was unable to produce the neurological check sheets for Res #1 or Res #13. She stated the neuro checks were done on pen and paper and were lost.The Progress Note of Resident #18 dated 8/22/25, authored by Staff O, Registered Nurse noted IDT (interdisciplinary team) met to discuss fall on 8/21/25. RCA (root cause analysis) performed. Hoyer (full body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. In addition, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a safe and hygienic manner that promotes food safety. The facility reported a census of 84. Findings include: During the initial kitchen observation on 05/12/2025 at 07:44 AM, it was noted approximately 1-2 inches of standing water covering half of the kitchen floor, with the deepest part of the water located near the walk-in cooler and freezer. One staff member was preparing breakfast while the Dietary Manager attempted to push water down the drain to help it clear faster. The ceiling above the food prep table was hanging several inches. The tiles of the floor were uneven, cracked, and in places missing. The ceiling above the oven was also hanging, with black spots covering the area. The sink was broken and spraying water, contributing to the water pooling inside of the kitchen. The walk-in freezer had a large buildup of ice on the floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature to 2 of 2 residents (Residents #64, and #79) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #64's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Interview 5/12/25 at 1:34 PM with Resident #64 revealed that the food is constantly cold, and tastes bland. 2. Review of Resident #79's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 indicating intact cognition. Interview 5/12/25 at 2:08 PM with Resident #79 revealed that the food is often bland in taste, and that the food is often cold when served on a room tray. Observation 5/13/25 at 12:38 PM a sample tray was obtained from the South Hallway. Temperatures were obtained with the ham temping at 120.3 degrees Fahrenheit, and the green beans temping at 119…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to properly protect resident information from unauthorized access. The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: On 5/12/25 at 8:21 AM, an unsecured document was observed, face-up, on a medication cart containing resident specific health information. There were no residents or visitors in the hall however, several residents on that hall were independently mobile. On 5/12/25 at 8:23 AM, Staff Y, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated the information is normally supposed to be face down but a resident called her to take his blood pressure. She turned the paper over at that time. On 5/13/25 at 8:06 AM, an unattended, open laptop was observed with multiple residents' Electronic Health Information (EHR) visible. There were several mobile residents within eyesight of the laptop. Staff FF, Registered Nurse (RN) stated he made a mistake and left the laptop open. On 5/19/25 at 11:06 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated protected health information should be secured at all times. A policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. On 5/15/25 at 7:11 AM, Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) dropped a resident's medication on a report sheet on the medication cart. She picked up the medication with ungloved hands, put it back in the resident's medication cup, took it to the resident's room, and administered it to the resident. At 7:36 AM, Staff B stated she should've had gloves on or used a spoon to prepare medications. She also stated she should've never touched the medication with her hands. On 5/19/25 at 11:06 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the staff should have discarded the pill and gotten a new pill. An undated document titled Infection Control prevention directed staff to use strict aseptic technique when changing connections, accessing catheters, given IV push medications, changing bags, handling supplies, changing dressings, flushing and starting an IV. Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during wound care and while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care at the resident's request for 1 of 23 residents (Res #81). The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: On 5/12/25 at 8:27 AM, Resident #81 propelled her wheelchair in the hall up to Staff Y, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and notified her that she needed help because she wet her pants. Staff Y informed Resident #81 that Staff Z, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) would be in to change her. Staff Y continued to administer medications to other residents. She did not call for any staff to assist the resident. The resident remained in the hall in her wheelchair. At 8:28 AM, Resident #81 told Staff Y that she still needed help because she wet her pants. Staff Y told the resident someone would be in to help her. Staff Y did not call for assistance for the resident and continued to administer medications to other residents. At 8:29 AM, Staff Y pointed to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours after admission for 1 of 23 residents reviewed (#60). The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: On 5/12/25 at 4:07 PM, Resident #60 stated the she took medication for chronic pain and anxiety. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated completely intact cognition. The MDS documented the resident had diagnoses including Anxiety, depression, contracture of both feet, pain in joints of right hand, unspecified osteoarthritis. It also indicted she received antianxiety, antidepressant, antipsychotic, and opioid medication within the 7-day lookback period. It further indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Social Service Note dated 8/28/24 at 9:45 AM documented the following; resident transferred from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for 1 of 23 residents (#66). The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #66 dated 2/24/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 02 out of 15 which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented the resident had the diagnoses including congestive heart failure, kidney disease, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, and a right heel pressure ulcer. The MDS indicated the resident required maximal assistance with eating oral hygiene, bathing, and upper body dressing. It also indicated she was dependent with all other aspects of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), mobility, and transfers. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) included a Physician's Order dated 3/14/25 for Prevalon boots on at all times as tolerated except when weight bearing every shift for promote wound healing. The Care Plan with initiated date of 4/14/25 included the resident's right heel ulcer and directed staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #48, and #83) requiring the use of oxygen. The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #48 Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed an admission date to the facility of 3/25/25 from a short-term general hospital stay. The MDS further revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Observation 5/12/25 at 3:36 PM revealed no label or date on Resident #48's oxygen tubing as to when the tubing was changed. Interview 5/12/25 at 3:36 PM with Resident #48 revealed that the oxygen tubing had not been changed since being at the facility. Review of the Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) page titled, Physician's Orders revealed orders for oxygen tubing to be changed weekly on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to include psychotropic medication target behaviors and non-pharmacologic interventions in the Care Plan for staff for 1 of 23 residents (#60). The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include On 5/12/25 at 4:07 PM, Resident #60 was stated she took medication for anxiety. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated completely intact cognition. It included diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and unspecified osteoarthritis. It also indicted she received antianxiety, antidepressant, and antipsychotic medication within the 7-day lookback period. It further indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Progress Notes included multiple documentation the resident seemed less anxious or no anxiety noted but did not include associated target behaviors. It also did not include details or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have a process in place for a consistent accurate count of controlled medications. This failure resulted in narcotic medications prescribed to Resident #3 becoming unaccounted for. The facility reported a census of 84 residents. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #3, dated 4/17/25, documented diagnoses that included cerebral palsy, stroke, and polyneuropathy (a condition affecting multiple nerves throughout the body which can cause numbness, weakness, burning, sharp pain and muscle cramping). The MDS coded the resident received scheduled and as needed pain medications during the 5-day look back period. The MDS documented the resident was receiving opioid medications. The Care Plan of Resident #3 identified a focus area of chronic pain, revised on 4/22/22. The Care Plan identified sources of pain as cerebral palsy, neuropathy, low back pain and muscle spasms, and directed staff to administer analgesic (pain relieving) medications as per physician orders. A self…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to allow residents to make their own choices (Resident #2) and treat 3 of 3 residents with dignity and respect when they spoke with two (2) residents (Res #7 and #18) and failed to knock and wait for an invitation to enter a residents room/home for 2 residents reviewed (Resident #1 and #2). The facility identified a census of 83 residents. Finding include: 1. During an interview 11.14.24 at 1:35 p.m. Res #2, identified by the facility as interviewable, indicated she had a problem with Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) who made her go to bed when she had not been ready and had been rough with her during direct resident cares. 2. During an interview 12.3.24 at 1:28 p.m. Resident # 7, identified as interviewable by the facility, indicated Staff B presented as rude, disrespectful or unkind. The resident further described a recent incident when she asked the staff member where her call light had been positioned. The staff member then slapped her on the belly and threw her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain call lights in reach of 4 of 4 residents reviewed. The facility identified a census of 83 residents. Findings include: An observation 11.14.24 at 1:10 p.m. revealed the call light light/button positioned on the floor on the left side/window side of the Resident#13's bed while the resident had been positioned in bed and not in reach. An observation 11.14.24 at 1:24 p.m. revealed a pad type call light as it hung down the left side of the bed of Resident #12. The resident flagged down the surveyor and requested assistance to call his wife. As Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Nursing Supervisor/Manager ambulated down the hallway she had been informed the resident required assistance. When asked the resident where his call light had been located he reached for the positioning bar of the bed along wall side. When the call light had been pointed at on the left side of his bed/closest to the door the resident attempted to reach the device but had been unable to do so.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a clean, sanitary and homelike atmosphere for the residents who resided in the facility and failed to maintain the cleanliness of resident transfer devices. The facility identified a census of 83 residents. Findings included: A photo taken 11.19.24 at 1:45 p.m. revealed a .25 cent size area of dried and hard oatmeal and other food debris on the bedside stand of Resident #3 along with dried food on the floor between the resident's bed and the wall, a brown stain consistent with a bowl movement on the wall beside the resident's bed and a long silver metal tray under the resident's bed with a large amount of a dried black substance with the appearance of dried coffee or a dried loose bowel movement with a dead bug adhered to the area. During an interview 12.4.24 at 1:25 p.m. Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) described resident's rooms as in disarray. During an interview 11.22.24 at 12 p.m. Staff E, Certified Nursing Assistant/Certified Medication Aide (CNA/CMA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to properly transfer one (1) resident who required an assistive device (Resident #18), failed to provide appropriate oral cares for 2 residents reviewed (Resident #4 and #11) and failed to properly groom female resident's facial hair for 1 resident (Resident #6). The facility identified a census of 83 residents. Findings include: 1. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment form dated 11.14.24 indicated Resident #18 with diagnosis that included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia and Venous Insufficiency. The assessment indicated the resident with moderately impaired cognitive skills and as dependent on staff with transfers with an assistive lift device. A Care Plan identified Focus areas that included the resident sustained an actual fall revised 4.30.24 and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) revised 11.2.23. The Interventions included the following: a. Staff education provided to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility staff failed to properly assess 2 of 3 following a fall, an injury and/or change of condition (Resident #5 and #8) and failed to follow Physician orders for 2 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident #2 and #17 ) The facility identified a census of 83 residents. Findings include: 1. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) form dated 8.8.24 indicated Resident #8 had diagnosis that included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies, muscle weakness, difficulty walking and unsteadiness on her feet. The assessment identified the Resident had severely impaired cognitive skills, short and long term memory deficits, dependent on staff with transfers and non-ambulatory. A Care Plan identified the resident required staff assistance with her activities of daily living (ADL's) (revised 7.5.22) and transfers due to impaired mobility and at risk for falls (revised 3.16.23). The Interventions included the following areas: a. Transferred with two (2) staff assistance and an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-13 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility pesticide invoices and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a resident environment free of cock roaches. The facility identified a census of 83 residents. Findings include: During an interview 11.22.24 at 12 p.m. Staff E, CNA/CMA confirmed she observed cock roaches everywhere in the facility, in fact she killed a cock roach as it climbed/scattered across her medication cart that morning. The staff member observed cock roaches as they came out of resident sinks and resident rooms, up to and including a dead cock roach in the bed of Resident #20. During an interview 12.12.24 at 2:14 p.m. a family member confirmed he observed an alive cockroach on the sink in his mom's room just the other day. A photo taken 11.22.24 at 12:41 p.m. revealed multiple over 21 dead cock roaches in a trap in room of Resident #19 which is occupied by a resident with multiple cock roaches in a trap. During an observation and interview 12.3.24 at 1:50 p.m. revealed two (2) house cleaners in room of Resident #19 as they cleaned with the resident positioned in her bed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed implement Care Plans for one (1) resident reviewed (Resident #6) The facility reported a census of 83 residents. Findings include: A Minimum Data Sent (MDS) assessment form dated 9.5.24 indicated Resident #6 as dependent on staff with personal hygiene, which included shaving. A Care Plan with a Focus area revised 11.4.24 indicated the resident required assistance with her activities of daily living (ADL's) due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS). The Interventions included the following: a. The resident preferred 1 staff assistance with personal hygiene (revised 11.4.24). An observation 12.3.24 at 2:50 p.m. revealed approximately ¼ to ½ inch long whiskers on her chin. An observation 12.3.24 at 4 p.m. revealed approximately ¼ to ½ inch long whiskers on her chin. During an interview at the same time the resident indicated she wanted them shaved and she had not liked them on her chin. Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) Supporting Policy with revised date March 2018 directed staff as follows; Residents who are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, a facility staff member documented she performed a treatment for one (1) resident on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) (Resident #10) when the treatment had not been performed. The facility identified a census of 83 residents. Findings include: A TAR dated 11.1.24 thru 11.30.24 for Resident #10 indicated the resident received a Physician Order dated 10.30.24 as follows: a. Ammonium Lactate Lotion 12% applied to his bilateral lower extremities (BLE) one time a day (QD) for his Xeroderma (skin condition), covered with a super absorb and non-adherent dressing over the open areas, wrap with Kerlix gauze and secured with Ace Wraps. On 11.19.24 Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) initialed the treatment as completed. During an observation and interview 11.20.24 at 2:14 p.m. Staff J, LPN confirmed the bandages on the resident's legs as dated 11.18.24. The staff member confirmed the Physician ordered dressing changes QD. During clinical record review and an interview on 11.20.24 at 2:43 p.m. the TAR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility staff failed to maintain a locked and secured treatment cart and failed to provide appropriate nursing supervision to prevent a fall for one resident.(Resident #8). The facility identified a census of 83 residents. Findings include: On 11.21.24 at a time unknown the Interim Administrator identified 13 residents who wandered in the facility. Observations revealed the following as dated and timed: a. 11.14.24 at 1:11 p.m. a treatment cart in area of emergency crash cart across from nurse's station on the Terrace neighborhood left unlocked and unattended with no staff present. b. 11.19.24 at 12:09 p.m. observed the above treatment cart, in the same location, unlocked and unattended. c. 11.19.24 at 12:59 p.m. observed an unlocked and unattended medication cart positioned along the wall outside the nurse's station across from the emergency crash cart location on Terrace neighborhood. d. 11.20.24 at 10:04 a.m. Terrace cart B and C had been unlocked and unattended medication cart positioned along the outer wall of the nurse's station.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to label liquid Morphine (narcotic) and Lorazepam (anti-anxiety medications) as expected for 3 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident #8, #11 and #13 ) The facility identified a census of 83 residents. Findings include: During an observation and interview 11.20.24 at 10:10 a.m. revealed a plastic container in the Terrace A and B medication cart contained nine (9) unlabeled Morphine syringes as identified by Staff I, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) who confirmed the Nurse Managers/Supervisors drew up liquid Morphine and Lorazepam in unlabeled syringes for 2 months. During an interview 11.20.24 at 10:40 a.m., Staff A, LPN/Nurse Manager/Supervisor confirmed she pre-drew up the liquid Morphine as an estimate to how many a resident may have used in a 24 hour period of time based on the Physician orders. At 10:45 a.m. the staff member confirmed she pre-drew up Resident #13's Morphine syringes, not labeled. During an interview 11.20.24 at 10:40 p.m., the Interim Director of Nursing (DON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility staff failed to DONN (put on) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while they provided direct resident cares with catheters, PICC lines and open skin treatments for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2, #10), and failed to maintain a proper catheter tubing placement as a means to prevent infection for one (1) resident reviewed. (Resident #9) The facility identified a census of 83 residents. Findings include: 1. A photo dated 11.21.24 at 2:59 p.m. of an Enhanced Barrier Precautions sign posted on resident doors with such precautions included the following PPE directives to DONN when caring for residents: a. Gloves and gowns worn with the following high contact resident care activities: 1. Dressing, bathing/showering, transfers, linen changes, provision of hygiene, brief changes, toileting assistance, device care or use of a central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube or tracheotomy and wound care. 2. A photo…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide assessment and intervention for the necessary care and services for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility lacked assessments of the resident following a fall and an assessment prior to the resident being transferred to a higher level of care for evaluation and treatment. The facility reported a census of 77 residents. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated the resident carried diagnoses that included: atrial fibrillation, end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus, seizure disorder, fractured tibia and fibula, liver and kidney transplant status, and hemiplegia. Resident #1 required set-up assistance for eating, substantial assistance for bathing and personal hygiene and was dependent on staff for toileting and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff and resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services to promote the healing of a pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 77 residents. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated the resident carried diagnoses that included: atrial fibrillation, end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus, seizure disorder, fractured tibia and fibula, liver and kidney transplant status, and hemiplegia. Resident #1 required set-up assistance for eating, substantial assistance for bathing and personal hygiene and was dependent on staff for toileting and transfers. Resident was at risk for developing a pressure ulcer, and received dialysis. The Medication and Treatment Administration Record for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide a safe transfer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility failed to utilize 2 staff for a sliding board transfer as directed by the care plan resulting in a fall. The facility reported a census of 77 residents. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated the resident carried diagnoses that included: atrial fibrillation, end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus, seizure disorder, fractured tibia and fibula, liver and kidney transplant status, and hemiplegia. Resident #1 required set-up assistance for eating, substantial assistance for bathing and personal hygiene and was dependent on staff for toileting and transfers. The resident received antipsychotic, antidepressant, diuretic, opioid, and hypoglycemic medications and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for catheter order (Residents #2 and #5). The facility reported a census of 83 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a BIMS score of 15 which indicated cognition intact. The MDS revealed the resident required maximum assistance of 2 for toileting hygiene and showering. The MDS revealed the resident totally dependent upon 2 person physical assistance for bed mobility and transfers. The MDS coded the presence of an indwelling catheter. The MDS reflected the resident always incontinent of bowel. The MDS documented diagnoses that included: Renal insufficiency, Neurogenic bladder, Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Lymphedema, Polyosteoarthritis, Anxiety, and Depression. The MDS revealed Insulin, Antidepressant, Anticoagulant, Antibiotic, Diuretic, and Opioid. The Care Plan revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, collateral interview and policy review, the facility failed to assure each resident was treated with dignity and respect 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #48). The facility reported a census of 80 residents. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #48 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further documented the resident had diagnoses to include hip and knee replacement, cancer, multiple sclerosis and glaucoma. The Care Plan for Resident #48, with a revision date of 4/23/24, documented in the problem section the resident had a self-care deficit post-fall at home with fractured head of femur as evidenced by requiring assistance with transfers, impaired balance during transitions due to increased pain, and need for assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). In the intervention section, the resident is a one person…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure code status between the Iowa Physician's for Scope of Treatment (IPOST) and Care Plan were congruent for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for advanced directives (Resident #64). The facility reported a census of 80 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #64's physician orders revealed a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order effective [DATE]. Review of Resident #64's IPOST form dated [DATE] revealed a DNR status. Review of Resident #64's Care Plan revised [DATE] revealed the resident and her responsible party requested a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)/full code status and the code status will be honored through the next review with a target date of [DATE]. The Care Plan directed staff to provide emergency measures as appropriate including CPR. Review of facility policy titled, Advanced Directives, revised [DATE], revealed changes or revocations of a directive may be made at any time and the care plan team will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in a resident's nutritional status for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition and weight loss (Resident #6). The facility reported a census of 80 residents. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 9, which indicatyed moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further documented the resident had diagnoses to include medically complex conditions, renal insufficiency, osteoporosis and depression. The Care Plan for Resident #6, with an initiation date of 5/30/24, documented under the problem section resident is at risk for weight loss related to decreased appetite, with a goal the resident will weigh 160-170 pounds through the next review, with interventions to assess nutritional status quarterly and as needed, and to monitor weight and notify doctor of any significant change. Review of the electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, collateral interview and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of alleged abuse to the State survey and certification agency for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #48). The alleged abuser also continued to work with residents. The facility reported a census of 80 residents. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #48 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further documented the resident had diagnoses to include hip and knee replacement, cancer, multiple sclerosis and glaucoma. The Care Plan for Resident #48, with a revision date of 4/23/24, documented in the problem section the resident has a self-care deficit post-fall at home with fractured head of femur as evidenced by requiring assistance with transfers, impaired balance during transitions due to increased pain, and need for assistance with ADL's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, collateral interview and policy review, the facility failed to initiate and complete a thorough investigation of alleged abuse for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #48). The facility reported a census of 80 residents. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #48 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further documented the resident had diagnoses to include hip and knee replacement, cancer, multiple sclerosis and glaucoma. The Care Plan for Resident #48, with a revision date of 4/23/24, documented in the problem section the resident has a self-care deficit post-fall at home with fractured head of femur as evidenced by requiring assistance with transfers, impaired balance during transitions due to increased pain, and need for assistance with ADL's (Activities of Daily Living). In the intervention section, the resident is a one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to notify the Long Term Care Ombudsman of discharge/transfer of residents as required for 1 of 3 residents reviewed who were discharged /transferred from the facility (Resident #26). The facility reported a census of 80 residents. Findings include: Review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] and the facility's computer software program used for electronic medical record documentation revealed Resident #26 had discharged from the facility on 12/25/23, and hospitalized until reentered the facility on 12/29/23. The clinical record lacked documentation of notification to the LTC Ombudsman that Resident #26 had discharged to the hospital as required by federal regulation. During an interview 06/27/24 at 08:34 AM the Administrator stated the facility had not notified the Ombudsman when the resident discharged to the hospital. Review of the facility policy Transfer and Discharge, with a copyright date of 2023, documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to refer a resident (Resident #78) with a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) with a diagnosed serious mental disorder for evaluation of a Level II PASARR at the time the diagnosis was known to the facility for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility reported a census of 80. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #78 dated 3/28/24 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 6, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further documented diagnoses of acute diastolic heart failure, stage 3 chronic kidney disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, dementia, major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The MDS reflected the resident was taking an antidepressant medication. The care plan dated 10/6/23 for Resident #78 documented a focus area related to resident being at risk for emotional and/or physical distress related to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident with a urostomy and urostomy bag (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the abdomen to redirect urine away from the bladder and into a bag outside the body for collection) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheter (Resident #17). The facility reported a census of 80 residents. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #17 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident is cognitively intact. The MDS further documented the resident had diagnoses to include other neurological conditions, neurogenic bladder and paraplegia. The MDS documented that the resident had ostomy under the bladder and bowel section. The Care Plan for Resident #17, with a revision date of 6/5/24, documented under the problem section the resident is at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident, family, and staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards regarding following physician orders related to flushing catheters, proper medication administration with insulin pens and allowing a resident to self-administer a cream without a physician order for 4 of 18 residents observed. (Resident #21, #40, and #61). The facility reported a census of 80 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #21 dated 5/28/24 included diagnoses of multiple sclerosis, anxiety disorder, chronic cystitis, peripheral vascular disease, major depressive disorder and chronic pain. The MDS identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented the resident was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and had a catheter. The Care Plan dated 10/12/16 with a revision date of 1/18/24 revealed a focus area for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, and collateral interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment was free from accident hazards for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident #48). The facility reported a census of 80 residents. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #48 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further documented the resident had diagnoses to include hip and knee replacement, cancer, multiple sclerosis and glaucoma. The Care Plan for Resident #48, with a revision date of 5/25/24, documented in the problem area the resident had acute delirium related to declining mental health status and instructed staff in the intervention section to engage resident in simple, structured activities that avoid overly demanding tasks, redirect and provide gentle reality orientation as required, reorient to person, place, time, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on facility record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have the minimum required members present at their quarterly Quality Assurance (QA) meetings as directed by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The facility reported a census of 80 residents. Findings include: Record review reviewed revealed QA meetings were conducted on the following dates: 1. 4/20/23 2. 7/20/23 3. 9/25/23 4. 10/12/23 5. 2/16/24 6. 5/25/24 7. 6/13/24 Further record review revealed mandatory QA members were not present during the following meetings: 1. 4/20/23-No Administrator 2. 7/20/23-No Infection Preventionist 3. 9/25/23-No Infection Preventionist 4. 10/12/23- No Infection Preventionist 5. 2/16/24-No Medical Director During an interview 6/27/24 at 8:20 AM, the Administrator acknowledged all the required members were not present at the quarterly Quality Assurance meetings as expected.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, collateral interview and policy review, the facility failed to establish policies regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident #48). The facility reported a census of 80 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #48 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further documented the resident had diagnoses to include hip and knee replacement, cancer, multiple sclerosis and glaucoma. The Care Plan for Resident #48, with a revision date of 5/25/24, documented in the problem area the resident has acute delirium related to declining mental health status and instructed staff in the intervention section to engage resident in simple, structured activities that avoid overly demanding tasks, redirect and provide gentle reality orientation as required, reorient to person, place, time, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to perform proper hand hygiene during 2 of 3 residents (Resident #4 and #5) reviewed for wound dressing and treatments. The facility also failed to ensure resident assistive devices were maintained in a manner to keep them sanitary. The facility also failed to ensure resident's toilets were cleaned, failed to ensure the resident's drainage canisters were changed in an adequate timeframe and dated when they were changed out. The facility failed to properly wash the clothes of residents with COVID-19 and residents without COVID-19 appropriately to stop the spread of COVID-19. The facility reported a census of 80 residents. Findings include: 1. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 12/17/23 documented Resident #4 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10. A BIMS score of 10 suggested mild cognitive impairment. The MDS documented she had moisture…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and cleaning schedule review the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment. The facility reported a census of 80 residents. Findings include: Observations starting on 1/24/24 at 8:01 AM revealed the following: -room [ROOM NUMBER]'s wall air unit vent, where the air is pushed out of the unit in to the resident's room, observed multiple black specks throughout the area. - room [ROOM NUMBER]'s wall air unit vent was on and set at 80 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Where the air is pushed out of the unit in to the resident's room, observed black specks throughout the area. -room [ROOM NUMBER]'s wall air unit was on and set at 70 degrees F. Where the air is pushed out of the unit in to the resident's room observed black specks through out the area. - room [ROOM NUMBER]'s wall air unit vent was on and set at 80 degrees F. Where the air is pushed out of the unit in to the resident's room, observed multiple black specks throughout the area. - room [ROOM NUMBER]'s wall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to provide catheter drainage bag covers for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #1, #11, and #15) reviewed for dignity. The facility reported a census of 80 residents. Findings include: 1. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 1/18/24 documented Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. A BIMS score of 15 suggested no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented she had an indwelling catheter. The MDS documented the following diagnoses: neurogenic bladder, multiple sclerosis (MS), malnutrition, anxiety, and depression. The Care Plan focus area with a revision date of 1/18/24 documented Resident #1 had an indwelling suprapubic catheter with diagnoses of neurogenic bladder and urinary retention related to MS. On 1/23/24 at 1:39 PM observed Resident #1 in her motorized wheelchair throughout the facility with her catheter drainage bag attached to the front of her wheelchair, with no dignity bag to cover the drainage bag. Observed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff accurately recorded controlled substance medications counts, and failed to ensure proper destruction of controlled substances for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for use of controlled substances. The facility also failed to ensure the facility staff documented two staff signatures to indicate they performed and witnessed the narcotic counts whenever the facility had a transition in staff for 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 had diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, Parkinson's Disease, and renal insufficiency. The MDS documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 6, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS indicated the resident took scheduled and PRN (as needed) opioid pain medication 4 of 7 days during the look-back…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for three of four residents reviewed (Resident #6, #7, and #9). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 had diagnoses of COVID-19, asthma, and sleep apnea. The MDS documented the resident used oxygen. The Care Plan revised 1/10/22 revealed the resident at risk for alteration in skin integrity and required ear cushions on his oxygen tubing at all times. The Care Plan lacked information regarding oxygen use, care, and settings. The Bedside [NAME] Report dated 11/30/23 lacked information about oxygen use or staff directives for oxygen application and care. The Order Summary Report revealed an order for supplemental oxygen 2-3 liters (L) per nasal cannula (NC) continuously started on 11/3/22. Observation revealed: a. On 11/28/23 at 9:15 AM, Resident #6 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for a treatment and dressing change performed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for treatment and dressing changes (Resident #5). The facility also failed to follow physician's orders and ensure a resident had oxygen on when a resident was sent out of the facility to a doctor's appointment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen use (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had diagnoses of cerebral palsy, Parkinson's Disease, and renal disease. The MDS also revealed the resident had a surgical wound. Resident #5's Care Plan revised on 12/16/22 revealed the resident had a chronic buttock wound and impaired skin integrity related to a surgical dehiscence. Staff directives included to apply treatments per doctor's order. The Order Summary Report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview along with the facility policy/procedure, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for which the resident failed to receive their Parkinson's Disease medication for two days, this caused the resident to be admitted to the hospital with severe tremors.(Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 83 residents. Findings include: 1. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 with diagnoses that included: Parkinson Disease, tremors, Peripheral Vascular Disease and hypertension. The MDS revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 for which indicated no cognitive impairment. The resident was independent in activities of daily living and had the ability to be understood and understands others The Admit to Nursing Facility Order dated 4/25/2023, instructed staff to give Amantadine HCL ER (Gocovri)(Parkinson medication) 137 milligrams (mg) capsules, Take 274 mg by mouth every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly destroy Resident #6's narcotic (pain) medication per facility policy/procedure. The facility identified a census of 83 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #6' s Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 00, indicating no decision making abilities and an opiod (pain medication) was used in the last 7 days of the look back period. The MDS documented the resident with frequent pain in the last 5 days of the look back period and on a numeric scale of 1-10 as a 5, (Please rate your worst pain over the last 5 days on a zero to ten scale, with zero being no pain and ten as the worst pain you can imagine) and less than 6 month life expectancy. Diagnosis include heart failure, hypertension, other fracture, cerebral palsy, anxiety and depression. An Investigation Summary for Self-Report with date of incident 6/22/23 documented, On 6/23/23, Staff A, (licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, Medication Administration Records and Facility Policy reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a Comprehensive Care Plan that included measurable objectives and time frames related to resident specific concerns in regards to medications prescribed for 4 of 19 residents reviewed (Resident #6, #14, #73, and #71). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings Include: 1. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #14 scored 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. The resident had diagnoses including arthritis, Parkinson's disease, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, atrial fibrillation, and a stroke. The resident received antidepressant, hypnotic, and opioid medications. The March Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented Resident #14 received the following medications: a. Xanax (antianxiety) 0.5 milligrams (mg) 3 times a day for anxiety with a start date of 1/30/23.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, Menu review, and staff interview, the facility failed to serve the appropriate portion of meat for 5 of 5 residents who received pureed meat (Resident #12, #18, #40, #51 and #52) and failed to serve the posted Menu for 4 of 4 residents who received full pureed meals (Resident #12, #18, #40 and #52). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings Include: The facility's Week 3 Menu for Wednesday lunch identified the following items to be served for the meal on Wednesday, 3/29/23: a. Apple butter pork loin, 3 oz b. Stuffing, #12 scoop (2 & 2/3 oz) c. Roasted butternut squash, 4 oz Resident Diet Orders revealed 5 residents with orders for pureed texture meats and 4 residents with complete meal puree texture. During observation on 3/29/23 starting at 10:09 a.m., Staff A, [NAME] reported she was preparing six servings of pureed meat. She said four residents had a puree diet and one resident had puree meats only, and one extra serving would be prepared. After performing appropriate hand hygiene and gathering equipment and foods, Staff A placed 6 pre…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and employee interviews, the facility failed to properly sanitize resident dishes and utensils to prevent potential foodborne illness when the facility's dishwasher failed to heat the water to a proper temperature during the wash and rinse cycles. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings Include: In the observation of meal service preparation beginning on 3/29/23 at 10:04 a.m., it was observed the dishwasher was being used to prepare for lunch service. Staff A, Cook, completed the puree process. During the puree process, she used the dishwasher multiple times to wash the measuring pitchers and the food processor bowl. When preparing for full meal service, on 3/29/23 at 10:55 a.m., the Dietary Manger reported the booster for the heat box on the dishwasher was currently broken. She further explained she was aware this was broken on 3/28/23 and that the dishwasher was continued to be used but the water was not getting as hot as it normally does. During observation of meal service for the residents on 3/29/23 at 12:43 p.m., the dining room residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-04 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide residents or their representative the appropriate written notices when they no longer qualified for Skilled Care Services covered by Medicare for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #9, #20 and #62). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings Include: 1. Resident #9's Clinical Census page showed she was on Medicare A (Skilled Care) from 11/11/22 to 12/6/22. A review of Resident #9's record showed the resident's representative signed a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) indicating her Skilled Nursing Services would end 12/5/22. Resident #9's record lacked a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) was presented to the resident's representative as required. 2. Resident #20's Clinical Census page showed she was on Medicare A from 2/17/23 to 3/30/23. A review of Resident #20's record showed the resident's representative signed a NOMNC indicating her Skilled Nursing Services would end 3/29/23. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #54). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings Include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #54 identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, which indicated cognition intact. The MDS revealed the resident required setup help from staff to eat and ate independently following set up. The MDS documented diagnoses that included: end stage renal disease (kidney failure), anemia, diabetes mellitus, hyperkalemia (high potassium) and malnutrition. The MDS identified a weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in the last 6 months. The MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #54 continued to identify a diagnosis of malnutrition and a weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-04-04 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to notify the State Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for transfers out of the facility (Resident #2 and #20). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings Include: 1. Review of the Census List for Resident #20 revealed the resident's status as on Hospital Leave on 10/25/22 and returned on 10/31/22. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the Hospital. The facility had no documentation that staff notified the LTC Ombudsman when Resident #20 transferred from the facility to the hospital on [DATE]. The Notice of Transfer Form to LTC Ombudsman for the facility lacked documentation of Resident #20 being sent to the hospital in October 2022. In an interview on 4/3/23 at 9:50 A.M., the Administrator reported the facility did not have a policy on LTC Ombudsman notification of hospitalizations. She stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$434,825 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $311,880 — penalty dated 2026-02-11
  • $16,907 — penalty dated 2025-10-22
  • $71,136 — penalty dated 2024-12-12
  • $34,902 — penalty dated 2023-12-06
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-03-10 for 120 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-03 for 41 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CEDAR VIEW HOLDINGS — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AMARANTHINE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2025
CEDAR VIEW HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2025
CEDAR VIEW TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2025
IOWA 5784 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2025
SAMARA FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2025
GREATOREX, TINAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2025
SCHIOWITZ, MARCIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2025
SEBBAG, GABRIELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2025
OCONNER, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
REITER, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
4614 NW 84TH STREET PROPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
CARESAGE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
CLINICAL CONSULTING SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
JSJ 2020 FAM TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
JSJ PROPERTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
SAMARA FAM TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
SUMMATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
THE BRYN MAWR TRUST COMPANY OF DELAWAREOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$196K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 8%Other / private 26%

This home reported $196K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$384per resident / day
operating cost
$11,667per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$357per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165580. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next