No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Greenwood Center For Nursing And Rehab

149 Lafayette Avenue, Tamaqua, PA 18252 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 150 certified beds · (570) 668-1775 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (65%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
224 Claremont Ave · (570) 386-3800 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
220 Claremont Ave Ste 2 · (570) 668-1900 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
114 E Broad St · (570) 840-4519 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Miller Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
407 Schuylkill Ave · (631) 889-2307

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.0%16.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.6%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.0%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.3%0.2%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.0%17.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.3%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.5%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.8%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.7%17.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.4%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.4%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.1%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.0%9.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.331.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.511.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 185 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.44U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 103 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.8%CMS range 44.2–59.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.7–13.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge61.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting90.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.1%CMS range 6.9–12.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.001.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.54
RN hours/ resident / day
0.70
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.99
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.23
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
64.9%
Total nursing turnover
41.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 111.8 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-14)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, facility policies, facility investigative documentation, video surveillance, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible by failing to provide adequate supervision and implement effective interventions to prevent an avoidable elopement for one of 12 residents reviewed (Resident CR1). This deficient practice placed Resident CR1 and other residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, & 12) identified by the facility as being at risk for elopement in Immediate Jeopardy due to the likelihood of serious injury, serious harm, impairment, or death.Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Elopement, last reviewed January 28, 2026, revealed the facility's policy is to provide residents with a safe and secure environment and to proactively prevent resident elopement (when a resident leaves the facility or a designated safe area without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select investigation reports and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement effective safety interventions including necessary staff supervision of resident with known behaviors that increased the resident's risk for falls to prevent a fall with serious injury, a fractured hip, to one resident out of four sampled (Resident 27). Findings include: Clinical record revealed that Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia, protein calorie malnutrition and a history of falls with fracture at home. An admission Minimum Data Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated June 11, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13 and required staff assistance with activities of daily living. The resident's care plan dated June 8, 2023, indicated that the resident was at risk for falls with planned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-07-01 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of clinical records, select facility policies, job descriptions, facility-provided documentation, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined the facility administration failed to effectively use available resources and provide the leadership, oversight, and coordination necessary to ensure residents attained or maintained their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure effective administrative oversight and implementation of systems to protect residents identified as being at risk for wandering or elopement. As a result, one of twelve residents identified by the facility as being at risk for wandering (Resident CR1) exited the building without staff knowledge or supervision and entered an unsafe environment. This systemic failure placed Resident CR1 and other residents identified as being at risk for wandering or elopement in Immediate Jeopardy due to the likelihood of serious injury, serious harm, impairment, or death.Findings include: A review of the job description…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the food and nutrition services department. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). Observation during the initial tour of the kitchen conducted withe Employee 9 (cook) on January 11, 2026, at 9:44 AM revealed the following unsanitary practices with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living were provided showers as planned to maintain acceptable standards of personal hygiene for three of 26 residents sampled (Residents 5, 119, and 11).Findings include: A review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include fracture of the left femur (thigh bone), fracture of the sixth cervical vertebrae (the sixth bone in the neck), and dementia (decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life, affecting memory, thinking, judgement, language and behavior, caused by brain cell damage). An admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated December 22, 2025, indicated the resident required substantial/maximal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policies, observations, and staff, resident, and family member interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses accurately administered prescribed medication for one of 26 residents sampled (Resident 5), failed to ensure consistent implementation of a physician-ordered therapeutic positioning device for one of 26 residents sampled (Resident 106), and failed to provide appropriate wound care, treatment, and monitoring for one of 26 residents sampled (Resident 9).Findings include: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicates the registered nurse was to carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records, facility staffing records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care, for eight out of 26 residents sampled (Residents 53, 76, 104, 87, 5, 119, 11, and 103).Findings include: A review of nurse staffing data from January 7, 2026, through January 13, 2026, revealed the facility failed to meet the state minimum requirement for nurse aides on 14 out of 21 shifts reviewed. During the same time period, the facility failed to meet the state minimum requirement for licensed practical nurses on two out of 21 shifts reviewed. Additionally, review of staffing records revealed the facility failed to meet the state minimum requirement for total direct care nursing hours on two out of seven days reviewed.A clinical record review revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to consistently implement infection prevention and control practices and failed to ensure that reusable medical equipment intended for oral use was stored in a manner that prevented contamination for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 16). The facility also failed to evaluate infection surveillance data to determine potential contributing factors and identify the need for corrective actions.Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of cancer of the throat and tracheostomy (surgically created opening in the throat for purposes of breathing). An admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated November 11, 2025, indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13 (Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan to address the identified medical and treatment needs of one out of 26 residents sampled (Resident 5).Findings include:Clinical record review revealed Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include fracture of the left femur (thigh bone), fracture of the sixth cervical vertebrae (the sixth bone in the neck), and dementia (decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life, affecting memory, thinking, judgement, language and behavior, caused by brain cell damage). An observation of Resident 5 conducted on January 11, 2026, at approximately 12:40 PM revealed the resident was wearing a Vista cervical collar, an adjustable neck brace designed to immobilize the cervical spine following injury or surgery. A review of the physician's orders dated December 18, 2025, revealed an active order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently implement planned measures to prevent the development or worsening of pressure ulcers for one of 26 residents sampled (Resident 27). Findings include: According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research &; Quality, the pressure ulcer best practice bundle incorporates three critical components in preventing pressure ulcers: comprehensive skin assessment, standardized pressure ulcer risk assessment, and care planning and implementation to address the areas of risk. The American College of Physicians (ACP) is a national organization of internists who specialize in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of adults. The largest medical specialty organization and second-largest physician group in the United States, Clinical Practice Guidelines indicate that the treatment of pressure ulcers should involve multiple tactics aimed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, facility-provided investigative documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility did not demonstrate consistent reassessment and modification of care interventions for one of 26 residents sampled (Resident 72) following the identification of an injury risk during routine care.Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 72 had a diagnosis of left hemiplegia (paralysis to the left side of the body) and atrophy to the same limb (decreasing size of muscle due to lack of use). A quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) completed on November 9, 2025, revealed the resident was dependent on staff for moving in bed and dressing and was not interview able, with a BIMS of 10 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool to assess cognitive function a score of 8-10 indicates moderate cognitive impairment). A nurse's progress notes dated December 23, 2025, at 2:00 PM documented the resident was evaluated by a nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility-provided documentation, and employee interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of resident medical records for two of 26 residents sampled (Residents 90 and 102). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include anoxic brain damage (a serious type of injury characterized by a lack of oxygen to the brain) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a condition caused by damage to the airways or other parts of the lung that blocks airflow and makes it hard to breathe). A clinical record review revealed Resident 102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include dementia (a condition characterized by the loss of cognitive functioning such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). A review of Resident 102's clinical record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 43 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, state professional nursing standards, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure nursing services were provided in accordance with professional standards of quality by not ensuring licensed nurses accurately administered a prescribed medication within the physician-ordered parameters for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1).Findings include:According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicates the registered nurse was to carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals.The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.145 Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (a) The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health-care team by exercising sound judgement based on preparation, knowledge, skills, understandings and past…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, pharmacy records and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regime was free from significant medication errors for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications last reviewed by the facility on June 1, 2025, revealed that medications are administered as prescribed and in a safe and timely manner. The policy required staff to verify medication allergies and obtain vital signs, as applicable, prior to administering medications. A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include Type 2 Diabetes (a chronic condition in which the body has difficulty controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), congestive heart failure (weakness of the heart that leads to build-up of fluid in the lungs and surrounding body tissues), and nausea and vomiting.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility's abuse policy, clinical records, and select investigative reports and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to assure that one resident (Resident 2) was free from sexual abuse/harassment perpetrated by another resident (Resident 1) and out of 9 residents sampled.Findings included: A review of the current facility policy titled Abuse Policy, last reviewed by the facility on September 2024, revealed the resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property. Residents must not be subject to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies, family members or legal guardians, or other individuals. Further review defined sexual abuse as non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident including sexual harassment, sexual assault. A review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on April 22, 2024, with diagnoses to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy, facility investigative reports, clinical records and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate investigation into sexual abuse was completed for one resident out of 9 sampled (Resident 2). Findings included: A review of the current facility policy titled Abuse Policy, last reviewed by the facility on September 2024, revealed the resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property. Further review of the facility abuse policy revealed under the area of investigation all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation, shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies as defined by current regulations, and thoroughly investigated by the administrator and or designee. The administrator or his/her designee will provide appropriate agencies or individuals within five working days of the occurrence of the incident. A review of Resident 2's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's plan of correction from the survey ending July 24, 2025, the outcome of the activities of the facility's quality assurance committee, a review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain compliance with nursing home regulations and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies for one of six residents reviewed related to ensuring residents are free from sexual abuse (Resident 3) perpetrated by another resident (Resident 1). Findings include: As a result of the deficiencies cited under the requirements related to ensuring residents are free from sexual abuse during the survey of July 24, 2025, the facility developed a plan of correction to serve as their allegation of compliance, which included a quality assurance monitoring component to ensure that solutions were sustained. This corrective plan was to be completed and functional by August 19, 2025. However, during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-17 · tag F0559 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that written notice, including the reason for a room change, was provided to residents and/or their resident representatives prior to a facility-initiated room change for three of eight residents reviewed (Residents CR1, 3, and 4). Findings include: Federal regulatory guidance under §483.10(e)(6) notes that moving to a new room or changing roommates is challenging for residents. A resident's preferences should be taken into account when considering such changes. When a resident is being moved at the request of facility staff, the resident, family, and/or resident representative must receive an explanation in writing of why the move is required. The resident should be provided the opportunity to see the new location, meet the new roommate, and ask questions about the move. At the time of the survey ending June 17, 2025, all beds in the facility were licensed and dually certified for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, medication error reports, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to follow physician's orders and assure that two residents out of eight reviewed were free of significant medication errors (Resident CR1 and Resident 2). Findings include: The Principles of Medication Administration, The Five Rights of Medication Administration indicate that when you are giving medication, regardless of the type of medication, you must always follow the five rights. Each time you administer a medication, you need to be sure to have the: 1. Right individual 2. Right medication 3. Right dose 4. Right time 5. Right route According to the Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards Department of State, Chapter 21 State Board of Nursing, Chapter 21.145 Functions of the LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) requires the following: The LPN is prepared to function as a member…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility-initiated transfer notices, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide copies of written notice of facility-initiated hospital transfer notces for residents to a representative of the Office of the State Ombudsman for three out of 12 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 23, and 90). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital on February 10, 2025, and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], Although written notices were provided to the resident and resident representative of the facility-initiated transfer, there was no documented evidence the facility sent copies of written notices of these facility-initiated transfers to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 23 was transferred to the hospital on November 5, 2024, and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Although written notices were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and a review of nurse staffing data, it was determined the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure timely and quality care for 5 of 28 residents sampled (Residents 11, 17, 25, 59, and 97), and failed to ensure adequate response times and care provision as reported by 3 of 6 residents interviewed during a group resident interview (Residents 7, 21, and 41). Findings included: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include multiple sclerosis (an immune-inflammatory disease that attacks and damages cells in the central nervous system and causes neurological impairment) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated January 31, 2025, revealed that Resident 59 is moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain residents' rights to privacy and confidentiality by placing health care information in a place compromising the resident's privacy for one out of the 28 residents sampled (Resident 205) and failed to ensure that mail was delivered unopened to one of the 28 residents interviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 205 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure (a condition where the lungs fail to adequately exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide). A physician's order to maintain standard and transmission-based precautions due to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) precautions was implemented on April 8, 2025. Further clinical record review revealed a care plan focus indicating Resident 205 has altered respiratory status and difficulty breathing related to a COVID-positive diagnosis initiated on April 9, 2025.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) accurately reflected the status of two residents out of 28 sampled (Residents 101 and 102). Findings include: According to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual (an assessment tool utilized to gather definitive information on a resident's strengths and needs, which must be addressed in an individualized care plan, and the RAI also assists staff to evaluate goal achievement and revise care plans accordingly by enabling the facility to track changes in the resident's status) dated October 2024, Section A2105: Discharge Status indicates to review the medical record, including the discharge plan and discharge orders, for documentation of discharge location. A clinical record review revealed Resident 102 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy, clinical records, facility-provided documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide services in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to follow physician orders for wound treatments for one resident out of 28 residents reviewed. (Resident 255) Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Wound Care, last reviewed March 2025, revealed that all dressing changes must be marked with the date, time, and initials of the staff applying the treatment. The policy further directed that all wound care treatments must be documented in the clinical record at the time they are completed to ensure accurate and timely documentation of care provided. A review of Resident 255's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which include pneumonia (an infection in one or both lungs) and venous insufficiency (a condition where blood flow through the veins is impaired,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the ready availability of necessary emergency dialysis supplies for one of two residents reviewed who received hemodialysis (Resident 48). Findings include: According to the National Kidney Foundation, patients receiving hemodialysis, (a life-sustaining treatment for individuals with kidney failure that removes waste and excess fluids from the blood) must have access to emergency supplies, such as clamps and pressure dressings, in the event of complications such as hemorrhage or catheter dislodgement. A review of the facility policy titled Care of Resident with End Stage Renal Disease, last reviewed in March 2025, indicated that nursing staff will be trained to provide care to dialysis residents, including the ability to recognize and respond to medical emergencies such as hemorrhage or infection. A review of Resident 48's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, select facility policy, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the correct installation of bed rails was implemented for one out of the 28 residents sampled (Resident 33). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Use of Bed Rails, last reviewed by the facility in March 2025, revealed it is the facility's policy to ensure the safe use of bed rails as resident mobility aids and prohibit the use of bed bedrails as restraints unless necessary to treat a resident's medical condition. The policy indicates manufacturer's instructions for the operation of bed rails will be adhered to. A clinical record review revealed Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included morbid obesity (a chronic disease that's characterized by a body mass index of 40 or higher, or a body mass index of 35 or higher with obesity-related health issues) and bradycardia (a condition where the heart beats slower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures to ensure the timely acquisition and administration of a prescribed medication for one of 28 sampled residents (Resident 74). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (brain damage that results from a lack of blood). Review of an inter-facility transfer after-visit summary dated April 7, 2025, indicated Resident 74 was admitted to the community hospital on April 6, 2025, and discharged back to the facility on April 7, 2025. The discharge summary included a recommendation for the resident to begin taking gabapentin 100 mg capsules (an anticonvulsant and nerve pain medication), one capsule by mouth three times a day, for pain and discomfort. A review of the resident's medication administration record (MAR) for April 2025 revealed that Resident 74 did not receive any doses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, a review of the facility's planned menus, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate individual food preferences, to the extent possible, to increase resident satisfaction with meals for residents, which included two residents out of the 28 residents sampled (Residents 11 and 60), as expressed by one out of six residents during a resident group interview (Resident 21). Findings include: During an interview on April 13, 2025, at 12:15 PM, Resident 11 indicated that he is consistently served meals that do not match his preferences. He explained that he does not like eggs or Brussels sprouts, but the facility does not honor his preferences. He explained that he has refused his breakfast many times because eggs were served. Resident 11 indicated when they serve Brussels sprouts, he is not offered an alternative vegetable. During an observation on April 13, 2025, at 12:30 PM, Resident 11's lunch meal tray was observed with brussels sprouts. Resident 11's tray had a meal ticket indicating the resident disliked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the provision of adaptive dining equipment as prescribed to support safe eating for one of 28 sampled residents (Resident 59). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include multiple sclerosis (an immune-inflammatory disease that attacks and damages cells in the central nervous system and causes neurological impairment) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of Resident 59's comprehensive plan of care dated March 2, 2020, indicated a focus on aspiration precautions. The care plan was revised on September 26, 2024, following a documented choking episode, to include staff-assisted feeding using a small maroon dysphagia spoon (a spoon with a narrow, shallow bowl that promotes more efficient food transfer). The care plan stated that this specific adaptive dining utensil was to be provided on all trays…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the food and nutrition services department. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). Observation during the initial tour of the kitchen conducted with the facility's dietary manager on April 13, 2025, at 9:30 AM revealed the following unsanitary practices…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to afford a resident and their designated representative the right to participate in the development of the resident's plan of care for one resident out of seven residents sampled (Resident 3). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Resident Participation- Assessment/Care Plans, last revised February 2021, revealed the resident and his or her representative are encouraged to participate in the resident's assessment and in the development and implementation of the resident's care plan. Furthermore, the policy indicated facility staff support and encourage resident and resident representative participation in the care planning process by providing sufficient notice in advance of the care plan meeting and planning for enough time for exchange of information and decision-making. The social services director or designee is responsible for notifying the resident and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policy and reports and clinical records and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate the implementation of ongoing QAPI programs, to include the use of systems for investigating and analyzing the root cause of adverse events as evidenced by one resident out of six sampled (Resident B1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement last reviewed in January 2024, revealed that the facility shall develop, implement and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for the residents. The policy guidance of the QAPI program is to: (1) Maintain documentation and demonstrate evidence of its ongoing QAPI program which may include but is not limited to: a. systems and reports demonstrating systematic identification, reporting, investigation, analysis, and prevention of adverse events; and b.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a manner and environment that promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance as evidenced by four residents out of 18 sampled (Residents 3, 26, 40 and 79). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed that Resident 40 had diagnoses, which included congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should) and diabetes mellitus. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated April 12, 2024, revealed that Resident 40 is cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information; a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and orderly environment in resident areas on two of two resident units (West and East Nursing Units). Findings include: Observations on May 14, 2024, at approximately 11:10 AM of the [NAME] Nursing Unit revealed the following: Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] gouges in the surface of the wall were observed behind the resident's nightstand. Multiple small holes were in the wall by the resident's dressers. The paint on the wall was bubbling behind the toilet in the bathroom in this resident room and two holes in the hall near the toilet paper holder. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] observations revealed that resident's dinner tray from the prior evening, Monday May 13, 2024, remained on the nightstand. There were dirty used gloves atop the dinner tray. The resident's breakfast tray from that morning was also still in the room on the over the bed table. There were food particles and wrappers on the floor. [NAME] stains…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide supplemental oxygen administration as ordered for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 64). Findings include: A review of Resident 64's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included shortness of breath and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in your body). The resident had physician's orders as follows: Oxygen at 2 liters per minute per nasal cannula every shift for shortness of breath initially dated March 8, 2023; Check oxygen humidification water level and replace as needed initially dated March 8, 2024; Change oxygen tubing, humidification bottle, clean oxygen filter, and inspect easy foam wraps every Saturday on night shift initially dated March 8, 2024. Observation of Resident 64 on May 14, 2024, at approximately 11:15 AM revealed the resident was in bed with his supplemental oxygen in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician orders for individual pain management regimens were followed for five of 18 residents reviewed for pain management (Resident 54, 86, 64, 17 and 190). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include chronic pain disorder, rheumatoid arthritis ([RA] an autoimmune disorder that attack the joints and causes pain) and progressive neuropathy (nerve pain). A physician order dated February 6, 2024, at 3:27 PM was noted for Tramadol (pain medication) 50 milligrams (mg) by mouth every six hours as needed for severe pain related to chronic pain with a pain level 8-10. Review of the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of April 2024 revealed that nursing administered the prn opioid pain medication, Tramadol, to the resident on the following dates for pain rated lower than the physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and controlled drug medication sheets, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement procedures to promote accurate accounting of controlled medications for three of four residents sampled (Resident 64, 54, and 52). Findings include: A review of Resident 64's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included lower back pain and abdominal pain. A review of the resident's clinical record revealed that Resident 64 had a physician order initially dated March 27, 2024, and revised on April 4, 2024, for Oxycodone HCL (a narcotic opioid pain medication) 5 mg tablet every 6 hours as needed for pain level 8 to 10. A review of the resident's controlled substance records accounting for the above controlled medication revealed on April 8, 2024, at 12:00 AM, April 18, 2024, at 12:00 AM, and May 10, 2024, at 11:00 PM revealed that nursing staff signed out a dose of the resident's supply of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and test tray results it was determined that the facility failed to serve meals that are palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Findings include: According to the federal regulatory guidance at 483.60(i)-(2) Food safety requirements - the definition of Danger Zone, found under the Definitions section, is food temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit and below 135 degrees Fahrenheit that allow rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that can cause foodborne illness. During an interview with Resident 40 on May 14, 2024, at 11:00 AM the resident stated that the food is often not hot enough when served. During an interview with Resident 45 on May 14, 2024, at 11:33 PM the resident states that the food served in the facility could taste better. During an interview with Resident 79 on May 14, 2024, at 11:51 PM the resident states that the food tastes lousy here and is never hot when served. During an interview with Resident 3 on May 14, 2024, at 12:02 PM the resident stated that the food is not served hot and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, a review of the facility's planned menus and grievances submitted to the facility, and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide preferred food as planned and accommodate individual food preferences to the extent possible to increase satisfaction with meals for seven residents out of 18 sampled (Residents 40, 3, 28, 69, 45, and 19). Findings include: A review of the facility's 2 Gram Sodium Diet revealed that this diet is a strict sodium restriction omitting the use of saltshaker at the table and cooking. Salted food items and foods of sodium content are eliminated or replaced with a low-sodium alternate unless otherwise calculated into the diet by the dietitian. The diet can be individualized. Review of Grievance/Concern Form dated March 25, 2024, revealed that Resident 3 had a concern related to her lunch. She had selected a steak sub on her meal ticket but received baked ziti. The resident indicated that the kitchen said I knew they did not have steak subs left, but I was not informed of this, I also did not get a tea…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) accurately reflected the status of one resident out of 18 sampled (Resident 17). Findings include: According to the RAI User's Manual dated October 2023, Section J0100 Pain Management reflects pain medication the resident received in the last 5 days. The quarterly MDS Assessment of Resident 17 dated March 12, 2024, revealed Section J0100 indicated the resident did not receive scheduled pain medication or as needed pain medication in the last 5 days. A review of Resident 17's March 2024 Medication Administration Record revealed that the resident received physician prescribed Acetaminophen as needed pain medication 5 times in the last 5 days. Review of Section J Other Orthopedic Surgery indicated under J2500 that Resident 17 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to revise the residents' comprehensive plan in response to a change in condition for two residents out of 18 reviewed (Resident 77 and 17). Findings include: A review of Resident 77's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm of the prostate and obstructive and reflex uropathy. A review of the resident's comprehensive plan of care, last revised by the facility March 19, 2024, revealed that the resident had an indwelling catheter, a 16 French Foley catheter (a medical device place through your urethra into your bladder to drain urine) with a 30 cc balloon. A review of a progress note dated April 5, 2024 at 3:54 PM indicated the resident had a suprapubic catheter (a medical device that helps drain urine from your bladder. It enters your body through a small incision in your abdomen) placed. A review of physician's orders dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately assess bowel and bladder function and implement individualized approaches to restore normal bowel and bladder function to the extent possible for one out of 18 sampled residents (Resident 86). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease, unsteadiness on feet, and muscle weakness. A review of the resident's three day bowel and bladder diary completed April 29, 2024, revealed that the resident was frequently incontinent of urine. However, a review of the resident's admission bowel and bladder assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was continent of bowel and bladder. A review of Resident 86's admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS- a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated May 2, 2024, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide person-centered care for one resident receiving hemodialysis services out of 18 sampled (Resident 80). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include stage 4 chronic kidney disease and dependence on renal dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly). A review of a progress note dated May 6, 2024, at 10:00 AM revealed that the resident was on a leave of absence from the facility to go to dialysis. A review of a progress note dated May 8, 2024, at 10:30 AM indicated the resident left for dialysis in stable condition. A review of a progress note dated May 10, 2024, at 9:50 AM revealed the resident left the facility in stable condition to go to dialysis services. A review of a progress note dated May 15, 2023, at 10:00 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility reports and clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to assure that nursing staff possessed the necessary knowledge, competencies, and skill sets to provide care to meet a resident's individualized needs as identified in the resident's current plan of care for one resident out of 18 sampled (Resident 22). Findings include: A review of the clinical record of Resident 22 revealed admission to the facility on March 11, 2013, with diagnoses including Lennox-Gas taut Syndrome (a rare and severe form of epilepsy (seizure - a period of abnormally excessive neuronal activity in the brain) that starts in childhood and causes multiple types of seizures), intractable with status epilepticus, localization -related (focal)(partial) symptomatic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes with simple partial seizures, intractable with status epilepticus and anoxic (without oxygen) brain damage. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an effective individualized person-centered plan to address a resident's dementia-related behavioral symptoms for one out of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 20). Findings include: A review of Resident 20's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include vascular dementia (A condition caused by the lack of blood that carries oxygen and nutrient to a part of the brain. It causes problems with reasoning, planning, judgment, and memory.) A review of Resident 20's Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated April 17, 2024, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A review of progress notes in the resident's clinical record dated from February 01, 2024 to May 16, 2024, revealed that the resident exhibited behaviors of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate medication labeling for one of 18 residents sampled (Resident 54). Findings include: Review of Pa Code Chapter 27. State Board of Pharmacy, 27.18 Standards of Practice, (d) The container in which a prescription drug or device is sold or dispensed to the ultimate consumer shall bear a label which shall be written in ink, typed or computer generated and shall contain the following information: (1) The name, address, telephone number and DEA number of the pharmacy. (2) The name of the patient. (3) Full directions for the use of its contents. (4) The name of the prescriber. (5) The serial number of the prescription and the date originally filled. (6) The trade of brand name of the drug, strength, dosage form and quantity dispensed, the manufacturer's name shall also be shown. (7) On controlled substances, the statement: Caution: Federal law prohibits the transfer of this drug to any person other than the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to timely obtain prescribed laboratory services for one resident out of 18 sampled (Resident 39). Findings included: A review of clinical record revealed Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses, which included dementia. A CRNP (certified registered nurse practitioner) note dated May 10, 2024, revealed that the CRNP examined the resident. The CRNP noted that the resident was complaining of burning upon urination and had increased agitation. The CRNP was requesting a repeat U/A C&S (urinalysis and culture and sensitivity) before starting Bactrim (antibiotic). Review of Resident 39's clinical record during survey ending May 17, 2024, revealed no documented evidence that the CRNP's request for a repeat U/A C&S had been completed. There was no documented evidence that the facility completed the lab studies as the CRNP had requested. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on May 16,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the food and nutrition services department. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). Observation during the initial tour of the kitchen conducted with the facility's dietary manager on May 14, 2024, at 9:00 AM revealed the following unsanitary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to afford a resident's designated representative the right to make health care decisions on the resident's behalf for one resident out of six sampled (Resident CR1). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident CR1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included ascites [is the buildup of fluid in your belly, often due to severe liver disease], chronic kidney disease 3A [moderate kidney damage and noticeable loss of kidney function], unspecified dementia [confusion or mild cognitive impairment can't be clearly diagnosed as a specific type of dementia], and cognitive communication deficit [deficits result in difficulty with thinking and how someone uses language]. A readmission Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS -a federally mandated standardized assessment completed at specific intervals to define resident care needs) dated November 10, 2023, indicated that Resident CR1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record and select facility policy review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide effective individualized pain management consistent with professional standards of practice, administer pain medication as prescribed by the physician and attempt non-pharmacological interventions to alleviate pain prior to the administration of a pain medication prescribed on an as needed basis for two residents out of 18 residents sampled (Resident 3 and 30). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Pain - Clinical Protocol and reviewed by the facility on August 8, 2023, indicated that the physician will order appropriate non-pharmacologic and medication interventions to address the individual's pain and that staff will provide the elements of a comforting environment and appropriate physical and complementary interventions, for example local heat or ice, and repositioning. The staff will evaluate and report the resident's use of standing and PRN (as needed)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policy and controlled drug records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement procedures to promote accurate controlled medication records on three of three medication carts (East A, C and D hall) and accurate disposition of controlled drugs for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident CR1). Finding include: A review of facility policy entitled Controlled Substances, review date August 8, 2023, indicated that the facility shall comply with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of Schedule II and other controlled substances. Nursing staff must count controlled medications at the end of each shift. The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty must make the count together. They must document and report any discrepancies to the Director of Nursing Services. A review of the Shift Change Controlled Substance Count for the East A Hall medication cart on August 22, 2023, in the presence of Employee 3 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) at approximately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident clinical record and medication error reports and staff interview it was revealed that the facility failed to assure that two of 18 residents reviewed were free of significant medication errors (Resident 42 and 24 ). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis to include lung cancer, diabetes and dementia. The resident had a physician order, dated April 7, 2021, for Gabapentin (an antiseizure medication sometimes used for nerve pain) 400 mg, give one pill twice a day for neuropathy (nerve pain). A pharmacy recommendation to the physician dated February 10, 2023, revealed that the pharmacist recommended that the physician decrease the resident's dose of Gabapentin to 300 mg by mouth twice a day. The physician agreed and signed and an order written on March 1, 2023, to decrease the resident's Gabapentin to 300 mg BID. A review of a resident's March 2023 medication administration record (MAR) revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-25 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the availability of a functioning bed for all current licensed and certified resident beds in 15 resident rooms observed (Rooms 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200 and 201). Findings include: Observations made during an environmental tour August 22, 2023 at 11 A.M. revealed multiple broken beds on the three hallways of an unoccupied unit in the facility. Observation of resident room: 186 A and B- a sign on the bed stating that the bed is broken 187 A and B- a sign on the bed, bed broken 188 A and B- a sign on the bed, bed broken 189 A and B- a sign on the bed, bed broken 190 A and B- a sign on the bed, bed broken 191 A bed broken 192 A and B- a sign on the bed, bed broken 193 A and B-a sign on the bed, bed broken 194 A and B- a sign on the bed, bed broken 196 A and B- a sign on the bed, bed broken 197 A and B- a sign on the bed, bed broken 198 A and B- a sign on the bed, bed broken 199 A and B- a sign on the bed, bed broken 200 A and B-a sign on the bed, bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe and functional environment for residents, staff and the public. Findings include: Observations made of an unoccupied resident unit in the facility on August 22, 2023, at 10 A.M. revealed in that in licensed/certified resident rooms,188, 192, 193, 194, and 196 the P-TAC (heating and cooling units) were not functional. During an interview on August 23, 2023, at approximately 10 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed the observation of the non-functioning heating/cooling units in the above licensed and certified resident rooms. The NHA stated that presently one of the two resident units observed were vacant. She stated that when the heating/cooling units on the currently occupied side of the facility needed repair, the maintenance department would take the part from a broken unit in an unoccupied room to perform the repair. She further stated that using the broken units for spare parts in an vacant room was the practice, instead of ordering new parts for the broken units…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, a review of clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to timely and consistently provide individualized care and services based on the resident's identified needs and risk factors to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for one resident out of three sampled residents with pressure sores (Resident 175). Findings include: According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality, the pressure ulcer best practice bundle incorporates three critical components in preventing pressure ulcers: Comprehensive skin assessment, Standardized pressure ulcer risk assessment and care planning and implementation to address areas of risk. ACP (The American College of Physicians is a national organization of internists, who specialize in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of adults. The largest medical-specialty organization and second-largest physician group in the United States) Clinical Practice Guidelines indicate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CEDAR VIEW HOLDINGS — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
APOSTROPHE OPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/31/2023
CEDAR VIEW HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/31/2023
CEDAR VIEW TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/31/2023
SAMARA FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/31/2023
LEISER, ASHERIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/31/2023
SEBBAG, GABRIELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/31/2023
CLINICAL CONSULTING SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/31/2023
PRIORITY CARE GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/31/2023
SUMMATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/31/2023
NEILL, THOMASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
YAVORCHAK, MELISSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/02/2025
149 LAFAYETTE PROPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/31/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense22% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 13%Other / private 13%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$334per resident / day
operating cost
$10,152per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$369per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395875. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next