Harvest Acres Nursing and Rehab
204 North Keokuk Washington Road, Keota, IA 52248 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 35 certified beds · (641) 636-3400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0609, F0610) — most recent Nov 2024
- inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $136,500 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-07)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 32.9% | 17.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.2% | 4.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 16.0% | 4.2% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 17.3% | 3.8% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.1% | 16.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 37.3% | 20.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.0% | 95.3% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.1% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 41.5% | 25.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 46.6% | 19.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.24 | 1.49 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.66 | 2.08 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 35 beds and averages 28.7 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-11-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse for two of twelve residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #12, Resident #19). Resident #12, was a severely cognitively impaired resident with a previous history of unsolicited sexual touching. On 10/26/24, Resident #12, was touched on the breast underneath her clothing by Resident #19. On an unknown date, Resident #19 touched Resident #12 on the buttock. On an unknown date, staff reported Resident #19 grabbed/groped Resident #12. Resident #12's family explicitly instructed the facility staff that they did not consent to Resident #12 engaging in sexual contact with another resident. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) to the health and safety of residents. The facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from resident to resident physical abuse for 5 of 15 residents reviewed for abuse(Residents #11, #12, #13, #21, #77). Resident #22 hit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-11-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of abuse including allegations of staff to resident rough treatment resulting in fear, resident to resident physical altercations, injuries of unknown origin, and inappropriate touching of a resident's breast and buttocks by another resident, were reported timely to the facility administration for ten of twelve residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #7, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #15, Resident #16, Resident #19, Resident #20, Resident #21, Resident #22). This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy to the health, safety, and security of the resident. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 11/14/24 at 1:57 PM. The IJ began on 9/26/24. Facility staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on 11/18/24 at 12:28 PM by implementing the following actions: 1. All residents interviewed on 11/14/24, with no further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-11-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to conduct thorough investigations into allegations of abuse including injury of unknown origin, following concerns with staff rough treatment towards residents resulting in fear, following resident to resident incidents, and failed to ensure separation of alleged perpetrators following staff after becoming aware of allegations of abuse for eight of twelve residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #7, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #15, Resident #16, Resident #19, Resident #20, Resident #21). This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy to the health, safety, and security of the resident. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 11/14/24 at 1:57 PM. The IJ began on 9/26/24. Facility staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on 11/18/24 at 12:28 PM by implementing the following actions: 1. All residents interviewed on 11/14/24, with no further allegations of abuse or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate assessment and intervention for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for a change in condition. On 9/07/24 at approximately 12:30 PM, Resident #25 had difficulty transferring, which was a significant change in status, then at 2:35 PM the resident later had an unwitnessed fall, and was found face down in another resident's room, with laceration to the left forehead, Physician was sent a fax on 9/07/24, however, there was no response from physician until 9/09/2024 which noted they should could continue to monitor per facility protocol. There was no follow-up from the facility between 9/07/2024 and 9/09/2024. Staff acknowledged continued decline in Resident #25's condition when Resident #25 required assistance and cueing with all meals when independent prior. The Resident declined to a non-weightbearing of the left leg. The physician was notified on 9/17/24 of decline in transferring, at which time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2024-11-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure evaluation of a mobility device prior to resident use, failed to ensure gait belt utilized for transfer, failed to remain with a resident when a non-verbal resident suspected to have a seizure resulting in a fall, failed to ensure adequate supervision for resident with known history of falls when the resident was found multiple times post unwitnessed fall in the lobby of the facility, failed to ensure residents' feet were placed on wheelchair foot pedals when residents assisted via wheelchair, and failed to ensure residents remained free from environmental hazards when one resident ingested a [NAME] egg and another resident obtained access to a locked restroom without the knowledge of facility staff for six of ten residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #5, Resident #10, Resident #21, and Resident #22). This deficient practice resulted in the following injuries: Resident #2 sustained bruises and a head…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-11-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the correct diet for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition(Residents #11 and #226). The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: 1. The Care Plan, dated 10/31/24, revealed that Resident #226 has nutritional problem or potential for nutritional problem and required regular diet with pureed texture, and instructed staff to serve diet as ordered. Resident #226 diet order, dated 10/31/24, revealed order for regular, puree texture diet and thin liquids. Review of Nutritional Assessment, dated 11/04/24, informed that Resident #226 is at increased risk for altered nutrition due to co-morbidities, chewing and swallowing difficulty, and modified texture. The Discharge Summary from previous nursing home, dated 10/31/24, stated that resident needed supervision with eating and that resident should be served one food at a time with a small spoon . On 11/04/24 at 11:20 a.m., Staff A, [NAME] served Resident #226 a plate of regular consistency food. One minute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete and document care conferences after admission for two of three residents (Residents #5 and #11) and quarterly for two of three residents (Residents #3 and #5). The facility failed to document the following; the planning of care should include and assessment of the resident's current condition, needs that the resident requires, and updates which should be shared and communicated to the resident and or resident representative. A copy of the care plan should also be available to the resident, and or resident representative for review which the facility failed to do. The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Findings include:2. The modified Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool with reference date 8/20/26 revealed Resident #5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hyponatremia (low sodium level), non-Alzheimer's dementia, traumatic brain injury (TBI), anxiety, bipolar disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify residents' guardian/power of attorney of changes for 2 out of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #5, with medication changes) and failed to notify the physician of Resident #6's continued problem with abdominal pain and distention until 6 days later. The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Findings include:1. The modified Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool with reference date [DATE] revealed Resident #5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hyponatremia (low sodium level), non-Alzheimer's dementia, traumatic brain injury (TBI), anxiety, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and asthma, scored 9 out of 15 points possible on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) cognitive assessment that indicated moderate cognitive impairment, with symptoms of delirium present. The resident's clinical record revealed: The psychiatric hospital's discharge and transfer orders dated [DATE] that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff and resident responsible party interviews, the facility failed to implement an effective discharge planning process for 1 of 4 records reviewed for discharge plan, (Resident #4) that focused on the resident's discharge goals, prepared the resident to effectively transition to post-discharge care, and resulted in the resident's homelessness within 7 days of discharge, and the resident's return to substance abuse and hospitalization in critical condition from a drug overdose. The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Findings include:Resident #4 was admitted to facility on 10/2/25, transferred there from a sister facility due to the resident's exit-seeking behavior, where she'd been admitted from the hospital on 9/29/25. The MDS Assessment tool with reference date 10/9/25 revealed the resident scored 12 out of 15 points possible on the BIMS cognitive assessment that indicated mild cognitive impairment, without symptoms of delirium present,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to address PASRR recommendations on the Care Plans for two of three residents reviewed with Level 2 PASRR evaluations. (Residents #4 and #5) and failed to include interventions identified in an interdisciplinary meeting after incident involving one resident entering another resident's room causing Resident #7 to fear Resident #8). The facility reported a census of 25 residents.Findings include:1. The modified Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool with reference date [DATE] revealed Resident #5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hyponatremia (low sodium level), non-Alzheimer's dementia, traumatic brain injury (TBI), anxiety, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and asthma, scored 9 out of 15 points possible on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) cognitive assessment that indicated moderate cognitive impairment, with symptoms of delirium present. The resident's Level II PASRR (Pre-admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolatedEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure their staff had basic competencies and skills sets that met the behavioral health needs for residents the facility has assessed and developed care plans for, in accordance with their Facility Assessment. The facility failed to provide the education, as specified in the Facility Assessment, to promote the staff's competency, and failed to document staff competency for behavioral health management as required. The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Findings include: The Facility's assessment dated 5/2025 revealed:The facility had an average daily census of 27 resident, with age range of 43 to [AGE] years old. Seven of the residents had Level II PASRR's (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review, an in-depth, person-centered evaluation triggered when there is a suspected or confirmed mental illness, intellectual disability, or related condition. It ensures individuals are placed in the most integrated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident responsible party interviews, the facility failed to incorporate care requirements into resident comprehensive care plans as directed for 2 of 5 residents reviewed with Level II PASRR's (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review, an in-depth, person-centered evaluation triggered when there is a suspected or confirmed mental illness, intellectual disability, or related condition. It ensures individuals are placed in the most integrated, appropriate setting and receive necessary specialized services), and failed to ensure the 2 resident's attained or maintained the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being, evidenced by 1 of the resident's repeated inpatient psychiatric hospitalizations (Resident #5), and the other resident's inappropriate discharge that lead to homelessness and later demise (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Findings include: 1. The modified Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment tool with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to change gloves after completing incontinence care (of stool) and before applying Triad cream to a pressure ulcer to the coccyx area for one of one residents reviewed with a pressure ulcer. (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 25 residents.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 as severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 03 and had the following diagnoses: Heart Failure, Diabetes Mellitus and Non-Alzheimer's Dementia. The MDS also identified Resident #3 was totally dependent on staff for assistance with eating, toileting, showers, lower body dressing and putting on and removing footwear and repositioning. The MDS identified Resident #3 required substantial/maximal staff assistance with upper body dressing and oral hygiene. The MDS also identified Resident #3 displayed behaviors of delusions and physical, verbal and other behaviors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to complete the initial baseline care plan within 48 hours for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for baseline care plans (Resident #1, Resident #7, Resident 18, and Resident #34). The facility reported a census 27 residents. Findings include: 1.The Nursing Evaluation (Admit/Readmit/Quarterly/COC) V 15 form dated 11/4/25 at 3:12 PM for Resident #1 lacked initiation of a baseline care plan assessments for elopement/wandering, skin integrity, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), fall, nutrition, neurological, and pain. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS revealed Resident #1 scored a 5 out of 15 on the BIMS exam, which indicated that cognition severely impaired. The MDS revealed resident had delusions, independent with ADL and mobility. The MDS indicated medical diagnoses for Type II diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, depression, psychotic disorder (not schizophrenia), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, the facility policy, and the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, the facility failed to provide resident ending skilled care with the correct Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN) Advanced Beneficiary Notice for one resident (Resident #37) and Notice of Medicare Non Coverage (NOMNC) documents for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for ABN (Resident #22, Resident #36, and Resident #37). The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings include: 1. The SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review Form revealed Resident #36 started Medicare Part A services on [DATE] and his last day covered of Part A services was on [DATE]. A document titled Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for the resident was signed by their representative on [DATE]. The document footnote was Form CMS 10123-NOMNC (approved [DATE]). 2. The SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review Form revealed Resident #22 started Medicare Part A services on [DATE] and his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 2 of 5 residents reviewed (Residents #18 and #34). The resident's care plans contained focus areas, goals, and interventions that did not include person centered information. These sections were not updated when the comprehensive care plan was due at 14 days or with additional revisions. The facility reported a census of 27 residents.FIndings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #18 dated 9/10/25 documented diagnoses of hypertension, urinary tract infection within the past 30 days, anxiety and depression, and restlessness and agitation. The resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4/15 indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #18 required partial to moderate assistance with eating, hygiene, and dressing as well as supervision or touch assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and walking. The resident's admission date was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to notify the provider for blood glucose levels over 400 mg/dl (milligrams per deciliter) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for assessment/intervention (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 scored a 5 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated that cognition severely impaired. The MDS revealed diagnosis for Type II diabetes mellitus and the resident received insulin 4 out of 7 days. The Care plan revealed a focus area dated 11/17/25 for potential for hypo/hyperglycemia related to diabetes mellitus and resident had a Dexcom. The interventions dated 11/17/25 revealed accuchecks as ordered, and call MD (Medical Director) for accuchecks greater than 400 and less than 70.The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following Physician Orders: a. dated 11/10/25- Blood Glucose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to maintain a medication administration error rate under 5% related to unprofessional standards and principles during the survey process. Of 31 medications observed 3 were not administered according to provider orders or medication inserts, and a missing medicated patch that was to be removed from a resident was not located. (Residents #1, 7,12, and 13) The facility reported a census of 27 residents.Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1 dated 11/10/25 documented diagnoses of pneumonia, thyroid disorder, and schizophrenia. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) documented a score of 5/15 which indicated severely impaired cognition.At 7:47 AM on 12/9/24 Resident #1 was observed seated in a recliner in the common area after eating breakfast.During a medication administration observation on 12/9/25 at 8:02 AM Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administered Levothyroxine Sodium Oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to administer medications in a sanitary manner during medication administration. A nurse was observed putting pills in her hand before putting them in medication cups, applying a medicated patch without washing her hands afterward, and touching personal items between medication passes without washing her hands. The facility reported a census of 27 residents.Findings include:During a medication administration observation on 12/9/25 at 7:35 AM Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) unlocked the medication cart to administer medication. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed the resident was scheduled for a controlled medication located in a second locked area of the cart. Staff B took out the resident's medication card for Trazodone, matched the card to the EHR, and popped the pill into her left hand, and placed it in the pill cup. After administering the medication she washed her hands and moved on to another resident. During a medication administration observation on 12/9/25 at 7:49…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to provide care to residents in accordance with the care plan by failing to supervise 1 of 1 resident with a history of physical resident to resident altercations from other residents(Resident #22) and by failing to provide timely assistance for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a history of falls and seizures(Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 6/21/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #22 which included diabetes, arthritis, and hip fracture. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 1 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS stated the resident had the following: a. physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others (e.g., hitting, kicking, pushing, scratching, grabbing, abusing others sexually) which occurred 1-3 days out of the 7 day review period. b. verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others (e.g.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice by preparing medications in advance for 4 of 9 residents(Residents #2, #9, #11, #12) observed during observations of the medication administration pass and the medication cart. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: On 11/6/24 at 5:59 a.m., Staff B Licensed Practical Nurse(LPN) walked up to the medication cart and unlocked it. In the top drawer of the cart, there was an unlabeled medication cup which contained 3 pills. Staff B stated she just set them up and stated they were Resident # 3's Amlodipine(a blood pressure medication), Carbidopa(a medication used to treat Parkinson's, a disease which causes symptoms such as tremors), and Citalopram(an antidepressant). Staff B stated she just set them up. On 11/13/24 at 8:24 a.m., the top drawer of the medication cart located in the medication room contained 3 unlabeled medication cups each containing multiple medications. Staff B…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-19 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on previous 2567 review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure an effective QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) process to address previously identified quality deficiencies, resulting in multiple repeat deficiencies identified on the facility's current recertification and complaint survey that were previously identified during surveys completed in the last twelve months. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's CMS-2567 form from a recertification and complaint survey dated 1/16/24 to 1/23/24 revealed, in part, deficient practices identified with advanced directives, care plan revision, activities of daily living related to incontinence care, lack of a qualified Infection Preventionist to attend Quality Assurance meetings, and lack of a qualified Infection Preventionist. During the facility's current recertification and complaint survey initiated 11/4/24 to 11/19/24, deficient practices were again identified with all of the above areas from the facility's previous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-19 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to employ a required Quality Assurance(QA) committee member, a qualified Infection Preventionist, to perform infection control surveillance and report to the governing body. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: The QAPI Plan, dated 9/01/2021, revealed that staff members with the most knowledge and commitment to QAPI efforts will participate. Review of QAPI sign in sheets between 3/21/24 and 9/25/24 revealed no Infection Preventionist had been identified as present at meetings. The Facility Assessment, reviewed by Quality Assurance Committee on 8/15/24, revealed services and care offered based on resident needs included infection prevention and control, identification and containment of infection, and prevention of infections. On 11/19/24 at 2:06 PM, Facility Administrator reported that Director of Nursing (DON) had acted as Infection Preventionist for the facility, but was unsure if DON had been certified. Administrator informed that facility was unable to produce an Infection Preventionist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-19 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on policy review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide an Infection Preventionist with specialized training or certification to monitor and provide oversight for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: The facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, revised 10/2018, revealed that the facility's infection prevention and control program is coordinated and overseen by the facility Infection Preventionist. On 11/19/24 at 2:06 PM, Facility Administrator reported that Director of Nursing (DON) had acted as Infection Preventionist for the facility, but was unsure if DON had been certified. Administrator informed that facility was unable to produce an Infection Preventionist certification. Director of Nursing (DON) unavailable during periods of state survey to provide additional information on Infection Preventionist certification. On 11/19/24, the facility was unable to produce any data that indicated a certified Infection Preventionist was employed at the facility.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a manner to preserve dignity and respect for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #20) when staff failed to ensure residents had been kept clean and free from odors following episodes of incontinence in a timely manner (Resident #20), made unkind comments in the presence of residents in the dining room, and staff interview revealed concerns with a staff member being unkind. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #20 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 out of 15, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #20 required substantial to maximal amount of staff assistance for toilet hygiene and frequently incontinent of urine. Diagnoses included non-traumatic brain dysfunction, non-Alzheimer's dementia, heart failure, depression, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure consistent documentation of code status to indicate whether to perform Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) or Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status for one of three residents reviewed for advanced directives (Resident #22). The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #22 dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored 00 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated severely impaired cognition. Review of the Resident's Care Plan did not address the resident's code status. On [DATE], review of Resident #22's chart revealed an Iowa Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (IPOST) form dated [DATE] which directed CPR/Attempt Resuscitation. The resident was noted to have a DNR order in the resident's electronic orders. Review of the Physician Order dated [DATE] revealed, DNR (DO NOT RESUSCITATE). On [DATE] at 10:14 AM, Staff B,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility policy, and clinical record review, the facility failed to safeguard the resident ' s personal and medical information. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings Include: On 11/06/24 between 08:23a.m. -8:26 a.m., State Agency (SA) observed the computer left on and no one at the nurses desk with the point click care system (electronic charting software) open to document on residents and several names displayed. On 11/06/24 between 09:22 a.m. -11/06/24 09:31 a.m. when the computer timed out, the point click care (PCC) was open with several residents ' names displayed and no one sitting at desk. On 11/06/24 at 12:54 p.m., PCC system was open on a resident ' s chart and no one was sitting at the desk. On 11/06/24 at 02:25 p.m., Staff D, LPN walked away and left the resident chart open. Staff D, LPN Went to grab something in a different room and came back to the computer. Resident Rights Policy Statement with revised date of January 2019, directed staff as follows; The unauthorized release, access, or disclosure of resident information is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a hospital transfer for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalizations(Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 9/18/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #3 which included diabetes, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and psychotic disorder. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 0 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. The facility policy Transfer or Discharge, Facility-Initiated, dated October 2022, stated the facility would provide notice of therapeutic discharges to the long-term care ombudsman. A 10/19/24 Physician's Order Note stated the facility received an order to send the resident to the ER for evaluation and treatment. A 10/21/24 Health Status Note stated the resident returned to the facility. The facility lacked documentation of notification of the transfer to the Office of the State…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment following a resident starting hospice services for one of three residents reviewed for hospice (Resident #22). The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #22 dated 9/18/24 revealed the resident scored 00 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated severely impaired cognition. Per this assessment, the resident did not receive hospice services while a resident. The next MDS for the resident was a quarterly assessment dated [DATE], which remained in progress. Review of Resident #22's Hospice IDG (Interdisciplinary Group) Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update Report dated 10/1/24 revealed start of care date for hospice services on 9/19/24. On 11/19/24 at 12:34 PM during an interview with a Director of Nursing (DON) from a sister facility, the DON queried about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. The MDS assessment tool, dated 10/23/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #3 which included non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression, and psychotic disorder. The MDS stated the resident was dependent on staff for toilet and chair transfers and listed his BIMS score as 0 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. A 9/10/24 Care Plan entry stated the resident transferred independently. On 11/6/24 at 12:15 p.m., Staff C Certified Nursing Assistant(CNA) and Staff M CNA assisted the resident with a gait belt to stand up in order to pull down his pants and remove his brief. On 11/19/24 at 1:59 via phone, the Director of Nursing of a sister facility stated Care Plans should be up to date with regard to transfer status. Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Care Plan revision following discontinuation of antidepressant medication, failed to revise to include receipt of hospice services, failed to revise to include new skin concerns, and failed to revise to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure timely assistance with incontinence cares and positioning for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for incontinence cares (Residents #3, #20, and #22) and failed to provide eating assistance for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition(Resident #20). The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: 1. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 10/23/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #3 which included diabetes, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and psychotic disorder. The MDS stated the resident was dependent on staff for toilet transfers and toileting hygiene and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 0 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. Care Plan entries, dated 3/20/24, directed staff to ensure the resident toileted frequently before meals, after meals, at bedtime, and as needed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide ongoing, resident centered activities for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for activities(Residents #3, and #11). The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings: 1. The annual Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 12/10/23, listed diagnoses for Resident #3 which included non-Alzheimer's dementia, diabetes, and arthritis. The MDS stated the resident felt the following activities were somewhat important: group activities, news, fresh air. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 7 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. Care Plan entries, dated 1/1/24, stated the resident had the potential for alteration in recreational activities and socialization related to cognition, diabetes, depression, psychotic disorder and arthritis. The entries stated the resident enjoyed playing cards, attending group activities, bantering with other residents, singing, dog visits, music, outdoor events, exercises, table games, good…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat a urinary tract infection in a timely manner for one of two residents reviewed for urinary tract infection (Resident #12). The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #12 dated 9/13/24 revealed the resident scored 5 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated severely impaired cognition. Per this assessment, the resident was frequently incontinent of urine. The Care Plan dated 2/18/24 revealed, [Resident #12] has episodes of bladder incontinence and is at risk for impaired skin, UTI's, irritation in the peri-area. The Intervention dated 2/18/24 revealed, Monitor/document for s/sx (signs/symptoms) UTI: pain, burning, blood tinged urine, cloudiness, no output, deepening of urine color, increased pulse, increased temp, Urinary frequency, foul smelling urine, fever, chills, altered mental status, change in behavior, change in eating patterns. The Health Status Note dated 10/25/24 at 4:50 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the dimensions from the mattress to the bed rail or the bed rail gaps were less than 4 3/4 inches to ensure the bed rails did not pose a risk of entrapment or injury for 1 of 26 residents reviewed for bed rail safety(Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 9/13/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #2 which included seizure disorder, anxiety disorder, and depression. The MDS stated the resident was independent with rolling right to left and moving from lying to sitting. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 0 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. A 9/10/24 Bed Rails Informed Consent for Use stated the resident utilized bed rails for mobility and security(fear of falling out of bed). Care Plan entries, dated 9/10/24 , stated the resident was at risk for injury related to the use of bed rails/grab bars and stated the resident had a right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care such as psychiatric services and the development and implementation of person-centered care plans that included and supported the behavioral health care needs for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for behaviors(Resident #17). The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 9/4/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #17 which included traumatic brain injury, depression, and alcohol abuse with alcohol-induced mood disorder. The MDS stated the resident had physical behavioral symptoms directed toward others (e.g., hitting, kicking, pushing, scratching, grabbing, abusing others sexually) which occurred 1-3 days out of the 7 day review period, verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others (e.g., threatening others, screaming at others, cursing at others) which occurred 4-6 days out of the 7 day review period, other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others (e.g., physical symptoms such as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rates were not 5 percent or greater. The facility's medication error rate calculated as 12% after staff administered an incorrect dose of Vitamin D3, failed to prime an insulin pen, and failed to administer insulin in a timely manner with regard to the meal time. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: a. On 11/6/24 at 6:20 a.m., Staff B Licensed Practical Nurse(LPN) administered Vitamin D3 125 micrograms(mcg) to Resident #4. The November 2024 MAR(Medication Administration Record) listed an order for Vitamin D3 50 mcg 1 tablet orally one time a day. b. On 11/6/24 at 6:26 a.m., Staff B LPN checked Resident #2's blood sugar and it was 136 milligrams/deciliter(mg/dl). Staff B set the dosage of Resident #4's Humalog(a type of insulin) pen to 5 units and set the dosage of her Humulin(a type of insulin) pen to 5 units. Staff B did not prime the needle prior to setting the dose to 5 units. After the State Agency(SA) queried her as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors by failing to ensure a resident consumed food in a timely manner after the administration of rapid acting insulin(Resident #4) and by failing to prime insulin pens prior to administration The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 10/16/24 listed diagnoses for Resident #4 which included diabetes, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and unspecified dementia. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status score as 6 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. On 11/6/24 at 6:26 a.m., Staff B Licensed Practical Nurse(LPN) checked Resident #2's blood sugar and it was 136 mg/dl. Staff B set the dosage of Resident #4's Humalog pen to 5 units and set the dosage of her Humulin pen to 5 units. Staff B did not prime the needle prior to setting the dose to 5 units. After the State Agency(SA) queried her as to if there was anything additional she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and facility documents review, the facility failed to ensure all menu items were served to residents with an alternate diet for 2 of 2 residents (R#1 and R#226) on a pureed diet. The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: 1. The Care Plan, revised 2/20/24, revealed that Resident #1 is at risk for nutritional problems related to diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy and required pureed diet with honey thickened liquids. Resident #1 diet order, dated 10/27/2017, revealed order for regular, puree texture diet and honey consistency drinks. Review of Nutritional Assessment, dated 11/04/24, informed that Resident #1 remains at increased risk for altered nutrition. 2. The Care Plan, dated 10/31/24, revealed that Resident #226 has nutritional problem or potential for nutritional problem and required regular diet with pureed texture. Resident #226 diet order, dated 10/31/24, revealed order for regular, puree texture diet and thin liquids. Review of Nutritional Assessment, dated 11/04/24, informed that Resident #226 is at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of records for 1 of 2 residents receiving Hospice services(Resident #9) and for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for a change in condition(Resident #20). The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 8/14/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #9 which included Parkinson's disease(a disease which causes symptoms such as tremors), anxiety, and depression and listed his Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 9 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. An 8/27/24 Hospice Discharge Summary stated the resident was no longer terminally ill and discharged from Hospice on 8/23/24. A 10/1/24 Nursing Note stated the provider visited on 9/25/24 with no new orders and to continue on Hospice. A provider Encounter Note, dated 10/23/24, stated the resident received Hospice services. An 11/4/24 Dietary Note stated the resident remained on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to carry out infection control practices for 1 of 6 residents observed during medication pass observations(Resident #6). The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: On 11/6/24 at 6:08 a.m., Staff B Licensed Practical Nurse(LPN) administered the following medications(pills) to Resident #6: Lisinopril(a medication for blood pressure), Olanzapine(an antipsychotic), calcium and vitamin D, iron, and Omeprazole(a medication for heartburn). The resident dropped one of the pills in his lap and Staff B picked up the medication with her bare hand and placed it back in the resident's mouth. On 11/19/24 at 1:59 via phone, the Director of Nursing(DON) of a sister facility stated staff should pick up medications with gloved hands. The facility policy Administering Medications, revised December 2012, directed staff to follow infection control procedures during the administration of medications.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement an infection control surveillance plan to identify, track, monitor and report infections. The facility failed to provide documented evidence from February 2023 through January 2024 for an infection control surveillance program. The facility reported a census of 27 residents. The findings include: The facility provided a document titled Monthly Surveillance Report dated January 2023 which revealed: A Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) treated with an antibiotic. An eye infection The facility provided 3 documents titled Anti-infectives for Keota Healthcare Center revealed: Dated 2/1/23 to 2/28/23 listed a resident name and medication. Dated 3/1/23 to 3/31/23 listed 2 residents and 4 medications. Dated 4/1/23 to 4/30/23 listed 4 residents and 5 medications. Lacked evidence of surveillance for February, March and April 2023. The Facility Assessment amended on date 1/3/23 listed Services and Care Offered Based on Resident Needs revealed infection prevention and control, identification and containment of infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility document review or lack of, and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program (ICPC) that included a functional Antibiotic Stewardship Program. The failure to have a system in place that monitors antibiotic use in accordance with established protocols has the potential to affect all 27 residents of the facility. Findings Include: Review of a policy provided by the facility titled Antibiotic Stewardship revised October 2018, documented antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program. The purpose of our Antibiotic Stewardship Program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in our residents. Antibiotic usage and outcome data will be collected and documented using a facility-approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. The data will be used to guide decisions for improvement of individual resident antibiotic prescribing practices and facility-wide antibiotic stewardship. 1. Review of Resident # 2 Electronic Medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-23 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide an Infection Preventionist with specialized training or certification to monitor and provide oversight for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings include: The policy, titled Infection Control Policy and Procedure Manual, OBRA regulations and Interpretive Guidelines page 35, revised 08/2017, documented the facility Infection Preventionist is responsible for the facility's infection prevention and control program. On 01/22/24 8:47 AM Staff A, RN and Infection Control Preventionist, reported she had taken the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Infection Control Preventionist course but was unable to take the certification test. Completed documentation for a specialized staff Infection Preventionist was not available. Staff Staff A demonstrated a lack of understanding of information necessary to complete her duties as the facility Infection Preventionist. She indicated she took over the infection prevention role several months ago. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy the facility failed to implement advanced directives per resident and family directives upon admission for 1 of 3 residents reviewed and failed to clarify conflicting orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident#5). The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #5 had the diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, stroke, and dementia. The MDS revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The Care Plan dated [DATE] directed staff in regards to the care of Resident #5 as follows; a. Advanced Directives, the resident wishes to be Full Code. b. Initiate transfer to the hospital of choice. c. Maintain a copy of code status in the chart. A Clinical Resident Profile documented the resident code status as full code, with initial admission date of [DATE]. The Iowa Physician Orders for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure resubmission of the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) following new mental health diagnoses for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #25). The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #25 documented diagnoses including, neurological conditions, diabetes, encephalopathy, hypokalemia, delirium due to known physiological condition. Did not include any diagnosis in the psychiatric, mood category. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment coded 5 out of 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #25 documented diagnoses including, orthopedic conditions, diabetes, delirium due to known physiological condition. Major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified was added and encephalopathy diagnosis had been removed. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to complete a care plan within 48 hours of admission for one of one newly-admitted residents reviewed (Resident #25). The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Finding include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented resident admitted to the nursing facility from the hospital on [DATE]. The initial Care plan dated 5/24/23 documented Resident #25 potential risk for altered nutritional status as evidenced by history of encephalopathy, confusion, diabetes, constipation, and obesity. The Care plan clinical electronic health record lacked any documentation of a baseline care plan being completed within 48 hours of the resident's admission to the facility to direct staff on resident care needs. An Interview on 01/22/24 at 01:02 PM with the Business Office Manager (BOM) revealed a base line care plan could not be located in the clinical electronic record and was not in the resident's hard chart. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to update a Care Plan to include antipsychotic medication for 1 of 5 resident's care plan reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #25). The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings Include: The Quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #25 documented diagnoses including, orthopedic conditions, diabetes, delirium due to known physiological condition. Major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified was added and encephalopathy diagnosis had been removed. The MDS coded that antipsychotic medications were given during the last seven days and resident received on a routine basis. BIMS Score coded 7 out of 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Care Plan last revised on 1/10/24 documented that Resident #25 received antidepressant, diuretic, antihypertensive and antidiabetic medication. The Care Plan did not address that the resident received an antipsychotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident is dry and free from odors for 1 of 3 reviewed for incontinent residents (Resident #3). The facility reported a census of 27. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 12/21/23 listed diagnoses for Resident #3 which included medically complex conditions, cancer, heart disease, renal disease, dementia, malnutrition, anxiety, pulmonary disease. The MDS coded the resident for always incontinent of urine, revealed substantial and maximal assistance needed for toileting and hygiene. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment was not scored, which indicated the resident with cognitive impairment. The MDS document that the resident was rarely/never understood. The Care Plan with revision date of 3/22/23 documented the following for Resident #3; incontinent of bladder with risks of skin integrity, falls and infection. The Care Plan interventions directed staff to clean peri-area with each incontinence, monitor and document…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to limit a As Needed (PRN) psychotropic medication to fourteen (14) day limit and failed ensure Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #15 & #25). The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #25 included diagnoses, orthopedic conditions, diabetes, delirium due to known physiological condition and major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment coded 7 out of 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment The Care Plan with last revision date of 1/10/24 documented that Resident #25 received antidepressant, diuretic, antihypertensive and antidiabetic medication. The Care Plan fail to address that the resident received a psychotropic medication. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated January 2024 for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to employ a required Quality Assurance(QA) committee member, a qualified Infection Preventionist, to perform infection control surveillance and report to the governing body, and the facility failed to conduct Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings on a quarterly basis. The facility reported a census of 27 residents. Findings Include: The QAPI Plan dated 9/1/22 revealed: a. QAPI meetings will be held no less than quarterly. b. Staff members with the most knowledge and commitment to QAPI efforts will participate. The Facility Assessment amended on date 1/3/23 listed Services and Care Offered Based on Resident Needs revealed infection prevention and control, identification and containment of infection and prevention of infections. This also included a Staffing Plan that revealed the facility worked to recruit and maintain appropriate staffing levels to meet the residents' needs. In the event of staff openings in the nursing department, nursing administration will be available to assure that all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$136,500 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $136,500 — penalty dated 2024-11-07
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CEDAR VIEW HOLDINGS — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMARANTHINE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| CEDAR VIEW HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| CEDAR VIEW TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| IOWA 5784 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| SAMARA FAM TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| SAMARA FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| SEBBAG, GABRIEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| CASE, JANELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| MILLER, DANIEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| GAMZEH, DAVID | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/10/2025 |
| GREATOREX, TINA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/10/2025 |
| SCHIOWITZ, MARC | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/10/2025 |
| 204 N KEOKUK WASHINGTON ROAD PROPCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| CARESAGE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| CLINICAL CONSULTING SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| JSJ 2020 FAM TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| JSJ PROPERTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| SUMMATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $90K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165355. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.