No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Athens Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

200 South Main St, Athens, PA 18810 · For profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (570) 731-6919 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (570) 731-6919 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited May 2026Resident-funds citation (F0568)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
703 S Elmer Ave · (570) 888-8378 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1 Guthrie Square, Atrium lobby · (570) 887-2800 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi1.9 mi
2756 Elmira St · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
100 Riverfront Park Rd · (570) 888-7730 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.7%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.8%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.6%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms20.7%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.8%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.0%20.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.7%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.3%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.5%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table25.9%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.7%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.8%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.8%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.0%9.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.151.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.901.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 84 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
38.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 38.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.3%CMS range 38.4–58.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 6.3–13.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge38.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge30.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge18.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.5%CMS range 4.9–13.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.821.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
0.84
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.05
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.39
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
49.3%
Total nursing turnover
45.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 72.5 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

22
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-21)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2025-07-03)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

57 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food and maintain food service equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's main kitchen, and one of two nursing units (Sage). Findings include: An observation in the facility's main kitchen on May 18, 2026, at 10:15 AM with Employee 19, kitchen manager, revealed the following: The refrigerator referred to as the cook's fridge had a container of onions and peppers, tomato soup, and a turkey roast that were dated May 11, 2026. A rack containing loaves of bread and bags of buns had no receive date or expiration date on the bags. Employee 19 confirmed that the bags had been removed from the freezer but had not been dated. The dishwasher unit had a metal box located under the unit that Employee 19 believed was a contained heating element which had a thermal tape coating noted to be bubbling and peeling from around the unit. An observation on May 20, 2026, at 9:15 AM of the panty located on Sage unit revealed the following: The counter around the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents' medication regime was free from potentially unnecessary medications for two of five residents reviewed for medication regimen review (Residents 2 and 10). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Psychotropic Medication Use, last reviewed without changes on April 1, 2026, revealed that medications in the following categories are considered psychotropic medications and are subject to prescribing, monitoring, and review requirements specific to psychotropic medications: antipsychotics, antidepressants, antianxiety medications; and hypnotic/sedatives. Psychotropic medication management is an interdisciplinary process that involves the resident, family, and/or the representative and includes: determining adequate indications for use, adequate monitoring for efficacy and adverse consequences, determining appropriateness of gradual dose reductions, and preventing/identifying/responding to adverse consequences.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding physician ordered interventions for three of 18 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 5, and 30). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 30 revealed an active physician order dated February 6, 2026, for Resident 30 to wear tubigrips (elastic tubular bandage designed to provide moderate compression and support to reduce swelling in limbs) to his bilateral lower extremities every day. Review of Resident 30's plans of care developed by the facility to address his care needs revealed no intervention that included the use of tubigrips daily to his bilateral lower extremities. Review of Resident 30's MAR/TAR (Medication Administration Record/Treatment Administration Record, electronic documentation completed by licensed nursing staff for the completion of care) dated May 2026 revealed that staff initialed the application of the tubigrips…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement individualized person-centered care plans to address dementia and cognitive loss displayed by two of two residents reviewed (Residents 10 and 74).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 74 revealed the facility admitted her on August 27, 2025, with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that interfere with daily life). A review of Resident 74's admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated August 29, 2025, indicated that the facility assessed Resident 74 as having a diagnosis of dementia. The facility determined that a care plan for dementia and cognitive loss would be developed. A review of Resident 74's care plan revealed that there was no indication that the facility had developed and implemented a person-centered care plan to address the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement appropriate transmission-based precautions (TBP) for two of three residents reviewed on TBP (Residents 35 and 69), failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 2), failed to implement measures to ensure hygienically cleaned laundry in the laundry department, failed to ensure an environment free from the potential spread of infection related to hand hygiene for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 81) and in the facility laundry department, and failed to implement an effective Water Management Program for the prevention and control of water-borne contaminants, such as Legionella (a bacteria that may cause Legionnaires' Disease, a serious type of pneumonia). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 2 revealed an active physician's order dated April 29, 2026, for staff to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, use gown and gloves for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the pneumococcal immunization unless contraindicated for three of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Residents 22, 30, and 54).Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Pneumococcal Vaccine, last reviewed without changes on April 1, 2026, revealed that all residents will be offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. Prior to or upon admission, residents will be assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine and, when indicated, will be offered the vaccine series within 30 days of admission unless medically contraindicated. Administration of the pneumococcal vaccines or revaccinations will be made in accordance with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations at the time of the vaccination. Current CDC website information notes that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the COVID-19 immunization unless contraindicated for four of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Residents 5, 22, 30, and 54); and failed to maintain documentation related to staff COVID-19 vaccination status.Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), Infection Prevention and Control Measures, last reviewed without changes on April 1, 2026, indicated that the facility follows infection prevention and control practices recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to prevent the transmission of COVID-19 within the facility. The measures include encouraging staff, residents, and visitors to remain up to date with all COVID-19 vaccine doses, providing resources, and counseling about the importance of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Facility policies provided did not indicate that the facility would maintain documentation related to staff COVID-19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care and services were provided in a manner that enhanced resident dignity for two of three residents reviewed (Resident 8 and 25).Findings include: During an interview with Resident 8 on May 19, 2026, at 9:13 AM the resident stated she frequently prefers to keep her door closed and that staff often do not knock on her door before entering. During the interview, Employee 18, housekeeping, was observed entering Resident 8's room, opening the closed door without knocking and delivering laundry. After Employee 18 exited the room, Resident 8 indicated, See? They never knock. The facility failed to ensure residents' dignity related to valuing residents' private space. Clinical record review for resident 25 revealed a physician order dated November 11, 2025, for care of nephrostomy tubes (a thin catheter that drains urine from your kidney into an external bag). Observations on May 19, 2026, at 11:25 AM revealed Resident 25 sitting in a chair across…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to determine a resident's capability to self-administer their medications for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 3).Findings include: The policy entitled Self-Administration of Medications, revealed residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the residents to do so. As part of the evaluation comprehensive assessment, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medication is safe and clinically appropriate for the resident. If it is deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications, it is documented in the medical record and the care plan. The decision that a resident can safely self-administer medications is re-assessed periodically based on changes in the resident's medical and /or decision-making status.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident, family, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident or resident's responsible party received a personal fund statement quarterly for two of two residents reviewed for personal funds concerns (Residents 6 and 22).Findings include: Interview with Resident 22's daughter on May 18, 2026, at 2:14 PM indicated that the facility holds money for her mother, however, she did not receive a quarterly statement. Resident 22's daughter confirmed that her mother lacks the cognitive capacity to manage her own financial affairs. Clinical record review for Resident 22 revealed profile information that listed her daughter as her financial and healthcare power-of-attorney (POA), substitute decision-maker, and resident representative. Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) assessments dated January 21, 2026, and March 24, 2026, assessed Resident 22 as rarely or never…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 47 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate housekeeping and maintenance services to ensure a clean, safe, and orderly environment on one of two nursing units (Ivy unit and Residents 8 and 39).Findings include: Observation of Resident 8's room on May 18, 2026, at 1:05 PM revealed strong urine-like odor, and a pile of linens in a soiled linen bag with some linens noted on top of the bag. Concurrent interview with the resident revealed that she is incontinent of bladder and frequently urinates on the floor, then cleans it independently and puts the soiled linens on the floor to be collected later. During resident interview, Employee 18, housekeeping, was observed entering the residents' room and stating, The floor is not as sticky today. Observation of Resident 8's room on May 19, 2026, at 11:38 AM revealed that the room continues to have a strong urine-like odor, and the floor remained sticky underfoot. Observation of Resident 39's bathroom on May 19, 2026, at 10:07 AM revealed that the floor was sticky underfoot. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident representative contact information was communicated to the receiving health care institution for one of four residents reviewed for hospitalization concerns (Resident 2).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 2 revealed nursing documentation dated April 22, 2026, at 6:40 PM that Resident 2 wanted to go to the emergency room due to pain in his back. Emergency services (911) were at the facility and transported Resident 2 via a stretcher. The writer indicated that Resident 2's sister was made aware of the transfer. Review of Resident 2's clinical record profile information revealed his sister was listed as his representative. An, eINTERACT Transfer Form (document generated by the facility's electronic medical record system to ensure appropriate information is communicated to a receiving health care institution or provider), dated April 22, 2026, completed for Resident 2's discharge to the hospital, revealed that Resident 2 was listed as his own resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an assessment accurately reflected a resident's status for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 2).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 2 revealed nursing documentation dated April 22, 2026, at 3:08 PM that Resident 2 was on the floor. Resident 2 complained of mid back pain. Nursing documentation dated April 22, 2026, at 6:40 PM revealed that Resident 2 insisted on going to the emergency room due to back pain and 911 (emergency personnel) transported Resident 2 to the emergency room. Nursing documentation dated April 23, 2026, at 10:57 AM revealed that the writer called the hospital and obtained information that Resident 2 was admitted for vertebral (spinal) fractures for which he was going to have surgery. A Discharge MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) dated April 22, 2026, assessed that Resident 2 had a fall with an injury that was not coded as a major injury. The facility staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to revise a resident's plan of care for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 30).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 30 revealed an active physician's order dated February 6, 2026, that Resident 30 was to wear tubigrips (specially designed elastic bandages used to reduce swelling) to his bilateral lower extremities every day. Observation of Resident 30 on May 19, 2026, at 10:22 AM revealed that his lower legs and ankles presented with swelling and he was not wearing tubigrips. Review of Resident 30's plans of care developed by the facility to address his care needs revealed no intervention that included the use of tubigrips daily to his bilateral lower extremities. Review of Resident 30's MAR/TAR (Medication Administration Record/Treatment Administration Record, electronic documentation completed by licensed nursing staff for the completion of care) dated May 2026 revealed that staff initialed the application of the tubigrips in the morning. The surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a dependent resident with activities of daily living assistance for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 48).Findings include: Observation of Resident 48 on May 18, 2026, at 2:31 PM and May 19, 2026, at 12:34 PM revealed she was in bed and her hair appeared greasy. Interview with Resident 48 on May 19, 2026, at 12:34 PM revealed the resident was unable to recall when she last received a shower. Resident 48 stated she is supposed to receive a shower once a week. Clinical record review revealed the facility admitted Resident 48 on September 3, 2025. A review of Resident 22's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated March 27, 2026, indicated nursing staff assessed Resident 48 as dependent on staff for bathing. Review of Resident 48's plan of care-initiated September 3, 2025, revealed Resident 48 has an activity of daily living self-care performance deficit and is totally dependent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent falls for two of four residents reviewed for falls (Residents 8 and 37).Findings include: Clinical record review of Resident 37 revealed a fall without injuries occurring on February 13, 2026, in the resident's shower. The Interdisciplinary team determined that adding non-slip strips (tacky/rough material that adheres to surfaces) to the resident's shower would be an appropriate intervention, and that the care plan care plan (an outline of an individual's health needs, specific care requirements, and the actions necessary to achieve desired health outcomes, represented as the Focus, Goal, and Interventions) would be updated to reflect this. Observation of the resident's shower on May 20, 2026, at 9:30 AM revealed no non-slip strips were present. Interview with Employee 17, nurse aide, on May 20, 2026, at 934: AM, confirmed that the resident did not have any non-slip strips present in the shower in Resident 37's room, nor were any non-slip strips…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets related to the care and assessment of residents who utilize a lift, wound vac, PICC line, catheter care, medication administration, and dressing changes for two of four employees reviewed for competencies (Employees 5 and 6).Findings include: A review of the facility documentation revealed that the facility had a total of 70 residents receiving medications, 12 residents that utilize lifts (transfer equipment), one resident with a wound vac (medical device used to promote healing of complex wounds by applying controlled suction to the wound area) five residents with indwelling urinary catheters (insertion of a tube into the bladder to remove urine), 11 residents with dressing changes, one resident with IV therapy (intravenous therapy, a medical procedure that delivers fluids, medications, nutrients directly into a vein), and one resident with a PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's attending physician addressed and responded appropriately to pharmacy recommendations for two of five residents reviewed (Residents 3 and 10).Findings include: The policy entitled Consultant Pharmacist Reports, last reviewed without changes on April 1, 2026, revealed a record of the consultant pharmacist's observations and recommendation is made available in an easily retrievable form to nurses, physicians, and care planning team. Comments and recommendations concerning medication therapy are communicated in a timely fashion. The timing of these recommendations should enable a response prior to the next medication regimen review. Recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff and/or physician. If the physician does not respond to recommendations directed to him/her within 45 days, the Director of Nursing and/or the consultant pharmacist may contact the medical director. Clinical record review for Resident 3 revealed a consultant pharmacy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident, staff, and family interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide routine dental services for two of four residents reviewed for dental concerns (Residents 22 and 3). Findings include: Interview with Resident 22's daughter on May 18, 2026, at 2:17 PM revealed that she believed Resident 22 had, bad natural teeth; I think they are beyond (repair) at this point. Resident 22's daughter stated that she was not opposed to her mother receiving services from the facility's contracted dental provider. Clinical record review for Resident 22 revealed an annual MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at specific intervals to determine resident care needs) assessment dated [DATE], that assessed Resident 22 as having obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. The CAA (Care Assessment Area) for dental concerns triggered to prompt the facility to develop a plan of care regarding dental needs. Review of a plan of care initiated by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on closed clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an accurately documented clinical record for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 77).Findings include: Closed clinical record review for Resident 77 revealed that the facility discharged her on April 14, 2026. Nursing documentation dated April 14, 2026, at 10:06 PM revealed that Resident 77 was without response to verbal stimuli, without respirations. and without heart sounds. The nurse documented Resident 77's time of death as 9:30 PM. Nursing documentation dated April 14, 2026, at 11:32 PM revealed that the funeral home removed Resident 77's body from the facility. Physician discharge documentation dated April 14, 2026, at 11:54 PM noted, Care Plan: Comments: Encourage low salt diet and moderation with fluids. Otherwise fairly stable fluid status at this time. The surveyor reviewed the above concerns regarding inaccurate clinical documentation for Resident 77 during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing on May 20, 2026, at 8:29…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on a review of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting attendance and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the committee met at least quarterly and consisted of the minimum members (Infection Preventionist).Findings include: Review of facility documentation of QAPI committee meeting attendance dated August 26, 2025, to April 30, 2026, revealed that the facility failed to conduct a meeting for the first quarter of 2026 (January, February, or March). Attendance records indicated that the facility conducted a meeting on December 30, 2025, and again on April 30, 2026. Review of the attendance records dated April 30, 2026, revealed that the infection preventionist did not attend the meeting. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on May 21, 2026, at 11:03 AM confirmed the above findings. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3)(e)(3) Management

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-03 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a full-time qualified director of food and nutrition services in the absence of a full-time qualified dietitian. Findings include: During an interview on July 1, 2025, at 10:10 AM, Employee 2, registered dietitian indicated she was only employed at the facility three days a week (not full-time). Concurrently, Employee 1, dietary manager, indicated she was not a certified dietary manager, certified food service manager, did not have a national certification for food service management and safety, and did not hold a degree in food service management. In a follow up interview on July 1, 2025, at 12:00 PM the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the facility did not employe a full-time qualified dietitian or qualified director of food and nutrition services. Cross Refer F812 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3) Management

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain food service equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and store food in a sanitary manner in the facility's main kitchen and on two of two nursing units (Sage and Ivy). Findings include: An observation in the facility's main kitchen on July 1, 2025, at 10:10 AM with Employee 1, dietary manager, revealed the following: The interior of the water wells of the steam table were observed on (hot), with water in the compartments (wells that hold water produce the steam to keep pans of food placed above the water hot). Employee 1 indicated breakfast had been served and the breakfast pans had already been removed from the steam table. The interior base of the steam table compartments was coated in a buildup of brown film. A significant amount of food debris was also observed floating in the water of the compartments including vegetables, potatoes, and other food debris that was not served at breakfast. A two-door cooler was observed with three plastic bins on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-03 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident's privacy during a medication pass while utilizing staff personal electronic devices for two of two nursing units (Ivy and Sage Nursing Units) for one of 19 sampled residents (Residents 20). Findings include: Review of facility documentation entitled, Athens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Orientation, revealed that all staff attend and review this orientation upon hire. The orientation documentation revealed that staff received education on the HIPPA (Health insurance Portability and Accountability) Act of 1996, confidentiality, privacy, and resident rights. HIPPA protects protective sensitive patient information from being disclosed without their consent or knowledge. A HIPPA violation is punishable by law and could be subject to fines or jail time. Residents have the right to have their personal information kept private. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on July 2, 2025, at 2:200 PM confirmed that staff complete orientation and that this information was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding physician ordered interventions and treatments for one of 19 residents (Resident 67). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 67 revealed physician orders for the following: Ordered on May 29, 2025, and discontinued on June 22, 2025, for only registered nursing (RN) staff to drain the Aspira catheter (a chest tube/catheter inserted into the lung area/cavity to drain excessive fluids) every other day on day shift. RN staff were not to exceed 1000 ml (milliliters) of fluid each time. Staff were to document the output, color, and character of drainage in a progress note, Ordered on May 29, 2025, and discontinued on June 22, 2025, for only RN staff to change the Aspira chest tube/catheter drain dressing every other day on day shift. Ordered on June 5, 2025, and discontinued on June 22, 2025, for only RN staff to change the Aspira chest tube/catheter drain connecting valve weekly on day shift. Clinical record review for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to establish clear advance directives for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 28). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 28 revealed a physician's order dated [DATE], indicating the resident was to be a DNR (do not resuscitate, do not perform CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) if the person has no pulse and is not breathing). Record review for Resident 28 also revealed a POLST (Pennsylvania orders for lift sustaining treatment) dated [DATE], that indicated Resident 28 desired to be a full code (attempt CPR when the person has no pulse and is not breathing). The POLST was signed by the resident. There was no documented evidence identified or provided by facility staff to indicate Resident 28 completed an updated POLST after [DATE], or had discussions with facility staff or the physician indicating a change in wishes for life sustaining treatment was desired. The above information regarding Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, homelike environment on one of two nursing units (Sage; Residents 27 and 66). Findings include: Observation on July 1, 2025, at 11:42 AM revealed Resident 27's room had damage to the wall next to the bathroom door. There was 10 to 12 inches of exposed drywall paper. A hand sanitizer dispenser was installed, covering a portion of the damaged area. Observation on July 1, 2025, at 11:55 AM of Resident 66 room revealed a 2-inch area of exposed drywall paper on the wall next to the bathroom door. A hand sanitizer dispenser was installed, covering a portion of the damaged area. Observation of the Sage Nursing unit hallway on July 1, 2025, at 12:05 PM revealed a painted handrail with the paint rubbed off, exposing the underlying metal. This damage was most severe at the intersection of two hallways, next to the nursing station. Dried brown liquid splatter was observed on the lower portion of the wall behind two medication carts located across from the nursing station. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions related to fall prevention for two of six residents reviewed (Residents 7 and 46). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 7 revealed a diagnosis list that included the following: unsteadiness on feet, dementia (a group of symptoms related to loss of memory, judgment, language, complex motor skills, and other intellectual function, caused by the permanent damage or death of the brain's nerve cells, or neurons), abnormalities of gait and mobility, and muscle weakness. Clinical record review for Resident 7 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated May 6, 2025, that noted facility staff assessed the resident as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 4, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Current physician orders for Resident 7 dated April 28, 2025, at 10:30 PM indicated the resident was to have a bed/chair alarm and check…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement appropriate Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 276). Findings include: Review of the memo entitled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, gown and glove use) in Nursing Homes to Prevent the Spread of Multi-drug Resistant Organisms released by the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) on March 20, 2024, with an implementation date of April 1, 2024, revealed that nursing care facilities are to use EBP for residents with chronic wounds or indwelling medical devices during high-contact resident care activities regardless of their multidrug-resistant organism status. High-contact activity would include dressing, transferring, changing linens, providing hygiene, changing briefs, wound care, device care, etc. During an observation and interview with Resident 276 on July 1, 2025, at 3:07 PM an enhanced barrier sign was observed outside Resident 276's door. Resident 276 indicated that he had a urinary foley catheter (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility documentation, employee personnel record information, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide staff possessed the specific competencies, and skill sets related to transfer techniques for three of three employees reviewed (Employees 1, 2, and 3). Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) QSO-24-13-NH memo dated June 18, 2024, noted that requirements specify that the facility assessment must include an evaluation of diseases, conditions, physical or cognitive limitations of the resident population, acuity (the level of severity of residents' illnesses, physical, mental, and cognitive limitations, and conditions), and any other pertinent information about the resident population as a whole that may affect the services the facility must provide. The assessment of the resident population should drive staffing decisions and inform the facility about what skills and competencies staff must possess to deliver the necessary care required by the residents being served. The Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an environment free from potential accident hazards for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 2 and CR1). Findings include: Closed clinical record review for Resident CR1 revealed nursing documentation dated April 9, 2025, at 7:38 PM that the licensed practical nurse (LPN) noted an .obvious smell of marijuana attempting to be covered by (scented brand) air spray. Per the documentation, the LPN notified the registered nurse supervisor of the situation. Resident CR1's closed clinical record contained no evidence that the registered nurse supervisor investigated the allegation of potentially illegal drugs in the facility. Nursing documentation by a different LPN on April 12, 2025, at 2:30 PM revealed that Resident CR1's room smelled like marijuana. When the LPN asked Resident CR1 if she was smoking marijuana in her room, Resident CR1 reportedly .just smiled and stated well I need some kind of pain relief. Per the documentation, the LPN notified the registered nurse supervisor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) standards, clinical record review, review of personnel payroll records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an environment free from the potential spread of COVID-19 infection related to work exclusions for two of two employees reviewed (Employees 1 and 2), contact tracing for four of four residents reviewed (Sage nursing unit: Residents CR1, 1, 2, and 3), and transmission based precautions for two of four residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 3). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Work Restrictions and Return to Work Criteria for Staff, last reviewed March 1, 2025, revealed that staff with mild to moderate illness who are not moderately to severely immunocompromised may return to work after the following criteria are met: At least seven days have passed since symptoms first appeared if a negative viral test is obtained within 48 hours prior to returning to work (or 10 days if testing is not performed or if a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0661 — pattern
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide a discharge summary with the necessary components for two of two closed records reviewed (Residents CR1 and CR2). Findings include: Closed clinical record review for Resident CR1 revealed nursing documentation dated July 10, 2024, at 5:33 PM that Resident CR1 was discharged to home with home health services. An electronic Discharge summary dated [DATE], revealed no evidence that Resident CR1 or her responsible party received the document. The document did not include a reconciliation of all medications with Resident CR1. Closed clinical record review for Resident CR2 revealed nursing documentation dated July 26, 2024, at 3:14 PM that arrangements were made for home health and infusion (intravenous medication) therapy to assist with wound treatment and continuous antibiotic infusion in her home. Resident CR2's son assisted Resident CR2 from the facility via the family car. The documentation indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an environment free from the potential spread of infection for two of two residents reviewed for COVID-19 transmission based precaution concerns (Residents 1 and 3). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Infection Prevention and Control Measures, last reviewed without changes on August 1, 2023, revealed that the facility follows infection prevention and control (IPC) practices recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention to prevent the transmission of COVID-19 within the facility. The infection prevention and control measures that are implemented to address the SARS-CoV-2 are incorporated into the facility infection prevention and control plan. These measures include: Ensuring everyone is aware of recommended IPC practices in the facility, including the use of visual alerts with dates to reflect that recommendations are current and implementing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food items and maintain equipment in a safe and sanitary manner in the facility's main kitchen. Findings included: Initial tour of the facility's main kitchen on June 11, 2024, between 10:25 AM and 11:07 AM revealed the following: The clear lights on the ceiling had multiple dead insects and debris accumulated in the protective covers. There were opened bread products on a plastic rack near the kitchen entrance with no open dates that included the following: a partially used bag of hamburger buns, an open bag of hot dog buns, and a partially used loaf of bread. A wire storage rack in front of the sink had a build-up of debris on the bottom protective cover/shelf. There was a significant build-up of debris at the perimeter of the kitchen where the floor meets the wall. There was an extensive build-up of dust inside of the steamer exhaust area. A second wire storage rack had debris accumulating on the bottom cover/shelf. A clear plastic container holding various green and red lids that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-14 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident or resident representative received written notice of the facility bed hold policy at the time of transfer for six of seven residents reviewed for hospitalization concerns (Residents 3, 37, 59, 19, 34, and 60). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 3 revealed nursing documentation dated April 3, 2024, at 1:34 PM that Resident 3 was admitted to the hospital from her appointment with the wound care consultant provider. Resident 3 had a surgical procedure for a below the knee amputation. Nursing documentation dated May 11, 2024, at 1:36 AM revealed that Resident 3 had emesis resembling coffee grounds (indicative of gastrointestinal bleeding), had abdominal discomfort, and staff called emergency transport. An emergency room history and physical dated May 10, 2024, indicated that Resident 3 was admitted from the emergency room. A review of a Bed Hold/Transfer/Therapeutic Leave Notification form (form the facility utilized to communicate to a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and services to promote healing and prevent infections regarding pressure ulcers for two of seven residents reviewed (Residents 58 and 59). Findings include: Review of Resident 58's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated March 16, 2024, indicating that nursing staff were to perform wound care to Resident 58's coccyx (sacral area) wound twice a day by packing the wound with half strength betadine-soaked gauze and a dry dressing. Review of Resident 58's Treatment Administration Record (TAR, a form utilized to document the completion of treatments) dated March 2024, revealed that nursing staff did not complete the treatments on the evening of March 16, 2024, and March 18, 2024, the morning of March 19, 2024, and March 21, 2024. There was no additional documented evidence to indicate that nursing staff completed Resident 58's wound care as ordered by her physician. Review of Resident 58's weekly wound assessments revealed that the wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide physician ordered interventions for two of six residents reviewed for nutritional risk (Residents 25 and 59). Findings include: Review of Resident 25's plan of care dated August 6, 2020, and last revised on December 25, 2023, indicated that the facility determined he was a nutritional risk. The facility indicated that an intervention of a nutritional supplement would benefit him and maintain his skin integrity. A physician's order dated July 25, 2023, indicated that nursing staff were to provide 8 oz (ounces) of Boost (a nutritional supplement) twice a day. Review of Resident 25's Medication Administration Record (MAR, a form utilized to document the administration of select physician orders) dated April 2024, indicated that nursing staff did not give him the Boost five times, documenting that it was unavailable or on order. Review of Resident 25's MAR dated May 2024, indicated that nursing staff did not give him the Boost 26 times documenting that it was unavailable, none in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's attending physician addressed pharmacy recommendations for four of five residents reviewed (Residents 10, 22, 25, and 46). Findings include: Review of Resident 10's clinical record revealed that the pharmacist made recommendations on the following dates: February 25, 2024, and November 20, 2023. There was no documented evidence in Resident 10's clinical record to indicate what the recommendations were and if the recommendations were acted upon. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on June 14, 2024, at 12:00 PM confirmed the recommendations could not be located for Resident 10. Review of Resident 46's clinical record revealed that the pharmacist made recommendations on the following dates: March 28, 2024, February 25, 2024, January 28, 2024, November 20, 2023, and September 22, 2023. There was no documented evidence in Resident 46's clinical record to indicate what the recommendations were or if the recommendations were acted upon. Interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate clinical documentation for two of 13 residents reviewed (Residents 20 and 50). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 20 revealed that the resident was discharged from hospice services on March 17, 2023. Clinical documentation for Resident 20 dated May 16, 2024, at 2:21 PM revealed a physician's progress note that indicated under the notes section titled Care Plan to Continue Hospice care. Under the section titled Counseling and/or Coordination of Care of the same note it indicated to Continue skilled level of care. Clinical documentation for Resident 20 dated May 9, 2024, at 2:20 PM revealed a physician's progress note that indicated under the notes section titled Care Plan to Continue Hospice care. Under the section titled Counseling and/or Coordination of Care of the same note it indicated to Continue skilled level of nursing. Clinical documentation for Resident 20 dated April 4,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-14 · tag F0848 — pattern
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's arbitration agreements and staff interview, it was determined that the facility's arbitration agreements failed to ensure a neutral and fair arbitration process by ensuring the selection of a neutral arbitrator for six of six residents reviewed with a signed arbitration agreement (Residents 34, 47, 16, 62, 49, and 26). Findings include: Review of a Mandatory Binding Arbitration Agreement (an agreement that the resident and the facility will resolve legal disputes through binding arbitration, waiving their right to a trial) signed by Resident 34 on August 22, 2022, revealed that the document stipulated that, All Arbitrations shall be administered by (name of arbitrator services company which the facility utilized). The document also stipulated that if, .(name of arbitrator services company which the facility utilized), is unable or unwilling to handle the Arbitration, the parties will work in good faith to agree on an alternative neutral arbitration service, and if the parties cannot reach an agreement within thirty (30) days, the Facility will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement appropriate enhanced barrier transmission-based precautions for four of 13 residents reviewed (Residents 25, 49, 59, and 60). Findings include: Review of the memo entitled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, gown and glove use) in Nursing Homes to Prevent the Spread of Multi-drug Resistant Organisms released by the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) on March 20, 2024, with an implementation date of April 1, 2024, revealed that nursing care facilities are to use EBP for residents with chronic wounds or indwelling medical devices (i.e., indwelling urinary catheters) during high-contact resident care activities regardless of their multidrug-resistant organism status. High-contact activity would include things like dressing, transferring, changing linens, providing hygiene, changing briefs, wound care, or device care. Interview with Employee 5, nurse aide, on June 12, 2024, at 11:18…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-14 · tag F0882 — pattern
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and a review of the facility's infection control program, it was determined that the facility failed to have a designated Infection Preventionist with the necessary qualifications responsible for the facility's infection prevention and control program. Findings include: Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on June 11, 2024, at 10:02 AM revealed that the facility's previous Director of Nursing from April 1, 2024, to June 2, 2024, fulfilled the position of infection preventionist until her discontinuation of employment on June 2, 2024. The interview indicated that a current licensed practical nurse employee assumed the infection preventionist position. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on June 13, 2024, at 10:04 AM confirmed that no staff currently employed by the facility has completed any specialized training in infection prevention and control. The interview also confirmed that the facility could not provide any evidence of infection control committee meetings (that included the required members) since the facility's last standard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-14 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to offer the COVID-19 vaccine as indicated by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for four of five residents reviewed for immunization concerns (Residents 2, 35, 36, and 60). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Infection Prevention and Control Measures, last reviewed without changes on August 1, 2023, revealed that the infection prevention and control measures that are implemented to address the SARS-Co V-2 are incorporated into the facility infection prevention and control plan. These measures include encouraging staff, residents, and visitors, to remain up to date with all COVID-19 vaccine doses. The policy provided by the facility did not include education provided to residents regarding benefits and potential risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine, or the documentation maintained regarding education provided,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate housekeeping and maintenance services to ensure a clean, safe, and comfortable environment on one of two nursing units (Ivy Nursing Unit) and a facility dining room. Findings include: Observation of the facility's dining room located adjacent to the main kitchen on June 12, 2024, at 11:41 AM and June 13, 2024, at 10:40 AM revealed the following: various stains on the floor, the overhead lights had various debris in the protective covers, there were two stained ceiling tiles and one tile had a large crack in it near the middle of the room above where the residents were sitting for lunch service, debris and dust on the windowsills, and multiple dried splash stains on the glass of the windows. Observation of the shower room on June 12, 2024, at 12:26 PM revealed the following: a scratched and marred commode seat, dried and brown colored stains on the commode seat, the area behind the toilet paper roll had chipped paint, dead insects in the protective covering over the ceiling light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a restorative nursing program for one of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living concerns (Resident 18). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 18 revealed a diagnoses list that included the following: osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease) of the knee, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and muscle weakness. Review of the current care plan for Resident 18 revealed the resident requires assistance with walking and transferring. An intervention included one-assist with a rolling walker for mobility. Further review of the current care plan for Resident 18 revealed a restorative nursing program that noted a goal that the resident will ambulate up to 70 feet with a rolling walker, one-assist daily, and a wheelchair to follow for safety. The target date was noted as June 24, 2024. Interventions included the following: allow rest breaks as needed, encourage the resident to ambulate at her own pace, and the resident will ambulate up to 70 feet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care related to intravenous access and an implanted pacemaker for one of 13 residents reviewed (Resident 22). Findings include: The surveyor requested the facility's policy or procedure regarding care and services for the use of a PICC (PICC, long, thin, tube that is inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to a larger vein near the heart. The line requires careful care and monitoring for complications including bleeding, infection, and blood clots) line during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Employee 6 (clinical consultant) on June 12, 2024, at 2:15 PM, and June 13, 2024, at 2:00 PM. The facility did not provide a policy pertaining to the use of a PICC line during the onsite survey. Information regarding PICC line care available from the Mayo clinic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the coordination of dialysis services and administration of physician ordered medications for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 28). Findings include: Review of Resident 28's clinical record revealed that she received kidney dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays at an outside provider. Resident 28 leaves the facility to go to dialysis prior to breakfast being served around 6:45 AM. Review of Resident 28's current physician orders revealed that nursing staff are to administer the following medications in the morning: Miralax (stool softener) 17 grams, one scoop at 8:00 AM Protonix (treats acid reflux) 40 mg (milligrams) at 8:00 AM Eliquis (a blood thinner) 2.5 mg at 8:00 AM Simethicone (relives symptoms of extra gas) 125 mg at 7:00 AM Review of Resident 28's Medication Administration Record (MAR, a form utilized to document the administration of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly assess and obtain informed consent or provide the resident and/or responsible party with the risks and benefits for the use of side rails for two of 11 residents reviewed (Residents 10 and 34). Findings include: The policy entitled Use of Bed Rails, last reviewed without changes on August 1, 2023, revealed the purpose of the guidelines is to ensure the safe use of bed rails as resident mobility aids and to prohibit the use of bed rails as restraints unless necessary to treat a resident's medical symptoms. Further review of the policy included a section titled, General Guidelines, which noted that an assessment will be made to determine the resident's symptoms, risk of entrapment, and reason for using the bed rails. When used for mobility or transfer, an assessment will include review of the resident's bed mobility, ability to change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets related to wound care (Employees 1 and 2). Findings include: A review of the facility's current resident population documentation revealed that the facility had four residents who had skin concerns and/or wounds. A request for nursing staff competencies for wound care revealed the facility was unable to provide any. Interview with Employee 6, clinical consultant, on June 14, 2024, at 12:15 PM revealed that the facility does not have any competencies on Employee 1 or Employee 2 (both licensed practical nurses). The findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Director of Nursing on June 14, 2024, at 12:30 PM. 28 Pa Code 201.20(a) Staff development

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of active nurse aides and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a performance evaluation of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months for three of three nurse aides reviewed (Employees 3, 4, and 5). Findings Include: Review of the facility's list of active nurse aide staff revealed Employee 3 with a hire date in 2022; Employee 4 with hire date in 2022; and Employee 5 with a hire date in 2022. Requests to review Employees 3, 4, and 5's performance evaluations revealed no documented evidence that the facility is completing the evaluations at least once every 12 months. Interview with Employee 6, clinical consultant, on June 14, 2024, at 12:13 PM confirmed the above findings and indicated that no performance evaluations can be provided on any current nurse aide working in the facility. 28 Pa. Code 201.19 Personnel policies and procedures

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that essential equipment was in safe operating condition for the facility's main kitchen. Findings include: Observation and concurrent interview with Employee 12, Dietary Manager, of the walk-in freezer on June 11, 2024, at 11:00 AM revealed the emergency release on the interior of the freezer was broken and introduced an entrapment risk if the door would close and lock with a staff member inside of the freezer. It was unknown how long the emergency release was not functional. Employee 12 further noted that two staff members are supposed to be present when using the walk-in freezer so one staff member can stay outside to prevent the door from fully closing. Employee 12 indicated that maintenance is aware of the issue, but it has not been fixed. The Nursing Home Administrator was made aware of the issue on June 11, 2024, at 12:17 PM and again at 2:00 PM. The above was also reviewed in a meeting with the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on June 13, 2024, at 2:15 PM. 28 Pa.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing services met professional standards of quality according to the Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, by failing to ensure licensed nursing staff were knowledgeable in the necessary care and services for one of one resident reviewed with a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) (Resident 2) Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing 21.145 (f) An LPN may perform only the IV therapy functions for which the LPN possesses the knowledge, skill and ability to perform in a safe manner, except as limited under § 21.145a (relating to prohibited acts), and only under supervision as required under paragraph (1). (1) An LPN may initiate and maintain IV therapy only under the direction and supervision of a licensed professional nurse or health care provider authorized to issue orders for medical therapeutic or corrective measures (such as a CRNP, physician, physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practicable care regarding physician ordered vital signs, medications, and interventions for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 2). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 1 revealed a current physician's order for staff to administer Cinnamon 500 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth (PO) daily for diabetes mellitus and Chromium 200 micrograms (mcg) PO daily for diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident 1's January and February 2024 MAR (medication administration record, a form to document medication administration) revealed staff were administering his Cinnamon and Chromium medications daily with the Chromium being held 14 times and the Cinnamon being held 14 times in January. Neither medication was held in February. There was no documentation in Resident 1's nursing documentation that indicated justification as to why both medications were held. Observation of a facility medication cart on February 7, 2024, at 1:25 PM with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-05-21 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of posted daily nurse staffing data, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post and retain posted nursing staffing information for the past 18 months for two of two nursing stations (Ivy and Sage). Findings include: Observation of the facility on May 18, 2026, at 2:12 PM and May 19, 2026, at 5:09 PM revealed no evidence nursing staffing hours for the day were posted in the facility. A review of documentation provided by the facility that contained daily nurse staffing postings for April and May 2026, revealed that the facility did not have postings for the following dates and/or shifts: April 3, 2026 (second shift)April 5, 2026 (third shift)April 6, 2026April 7, 2026 (third shift)April 8, 2026April 9, 2026April 10, 2026April 11, 2026April 12, 2026April 14, 2026April 15, 2026 (second shift)April 16, 2026 (second shift)April 17, 2026 (second shift)April 18, 2026April 19, 2026April 20, 2026April 21, 2026 (second and third shifts)April 22, 2026 (second shift)April 23, 2026 (second and third shifts)April 24, 2026April 25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2025-07-03 · tag F0628 — widespread
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman upon transfer to the hospital for nine of 10 residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Residents 13, 23, 26, 28, 50, 55, 57, 64, and 66). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 23 revealed nursing documentation dated April 8, 2025, at 9:15 AM that noted the resident was sent to the hospital due to chest pain. Nursing documentation for Resident 23 revealed a health status note dated April 9, 2025, at 9:21 AM that noted the resident was admitted to the hospital. Nursing documentation for Resident 23 dated April 14, 2025, at 5:53 PM revealed the resident returned to the nursing facility. Clinical record review for Resident 50 revealed nursing documentation dated May 6, 2025, at 2:07 PM that noted the resident was sent to the hospital for a change in condition. Nursing documentation for Resident 50 dated May 6, 2025, at 10:45 PM revealed that the resident was admitted to the hospital. Nursing documentation for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-06-14 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer that included all the written components to the resident and/or the resident's responsible party and failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman upon transfer to the hospital for six of seven residents reviewed (Resident 37, 59, 3, 19, 34, and 60). Findings include: Review of Resident 37's clinical record revealed that the facility transferred him to the hospital on February 27, 2024. There was no documented evidence that that the facility provided Resident 37 and/or his responsible party with a transfer notice that included all the required contents: State long term care appeal agency or contact and address information for the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman including email address. There was also no documented evidence that the facility notified the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman regarding Resident 37's transfer to the hospital on February 27, 2024. Review of Resident 59's clinical record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-21 for 15 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CEDAR VIEW HOLDINGS — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.2+0.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CEDAR VIEW HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST27%since 12/30/2021
ML KIDS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST27%since 12/30/2021
LEISER, ASHERIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 12/30/2021
CEDAR VIEW TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST27%since 12/30/2021
SAMARA FAM TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST27%since 12/30/2021
SEBBAG, GABRIELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/30/2021
CLINICAL CONSULTING SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2025
PRIORITY CARE GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/28/2022
SUMMATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2025
BAILEY, CAITLINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/06/2025
MWESIGE, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
200 SOUTH MAIN STREET PROPERTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/30/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 6%Other / private 18%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$305per resident / day
operating cost
$9,259per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$307per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 396137. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next