The Haven Of Arcola
422 East Fourth Street, Arcola, IL 61910 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 100 certified beds · (217) 268-3022 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.0% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.0% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 61.6% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.1% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.5% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.3% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.3% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 38.4% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 12.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 43.8% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.09 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.75 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
35.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 35.8%CMS range 22.0–54.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 8.5–17.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.81 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 74.5 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.48 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to safely provide a resident wheelchair assistance, while obtaining a resident's weight, in a manner to prevent a fall. This failure resulted in a vertebra fracture for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for falls on the sample list of three. This past noncompliance occurred from 8/12/25 through 8/12/25.Findings include:R1's Diagnoses Sheet includes the following: History of Falling, Nondisplaced Fracture of Base Neck of Right Femur, Subsequent Encounter for Closed Fracture With Routine Healing, Presence Of Right Artificial Hip Joint, Aftercare Following Joint Replacement Surgery, Unspecified Osteoarthritis, Spinal Stenosis, Cervical Region, Other Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, Lumbar Region. Pain in Right Hip, Unsteadiness on Feet, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Not elsewhere Classified. Multiple Sites, and Unspecified Fall, Subsequent Encounter.R1's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents R1 was at high risk ( score of over 12) for falls with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident with known physical behaviors for two of four residents (R1, R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample list of seven residents. This failure resulted in R2 experiencing physical trauma including a lacerated lip, swollen eye, and multiple scratches, and fear of R1 causing R2 to refuse emergency services due to fear of R1 attacking R2 in the hospital after R1 punched R2 multiple times. This past non-compliance occurred from 7/18/25-7/25/25.R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documents medical diagnoses as Schizoaffective Disorder, Paranoid Personality Disorder, Dementia with Agitation, Extra Pyramidal and movement disorder and Paranoid Schizophrenia. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R2 as cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R2 requires supervision for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, transfers and walking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to use a gait belt during a resident's transfer and ambulation to prevent a fall for one (R40)of three residents reviewed for falls in the sample list of 44. The fall resulted in R40 sustaining a skin tear in the right arm. Findings include: The facility's Fall Prevention policy with a revised date of 11/10/18 documents, Policy: To provide for resident safety and to minimize injuries related to falls; decreases falls and still honor each resident's wishes/desires for maximum independence and mobility. Fall Prevention Interventions: 11. Transfer with proper number of assist and gait belt. R40's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents R40 is at risk for falls. The next Fall Risk Assessment was not completed until 9/27/23 which documents R40 is not at risk for falls even though R40 had falls on 9/6/23 and 9/27/23. On 10/2/23 at 11:00 AM, R40 was in R40's room in R40's wheelchair watching television. R40 stated that R40 fell in R40's room and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical and sexual abuse by other residents. The failure affects four of four residents (R2, R3, R4, R5) reviewed for abuse on a sample list of seven. Findings include: 1.) The facility's Final Incident Report dated 9/4/25 at 8:35AM sent to Illinois Department of Public Health reported an incident involving R4 and R5. The report states R4 was observed by staff on 8/30/25 at 3:50 PM touching R5 breast. R4's Medical Record documents R4 has diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder and cardiorespiratory condition. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4 is cognitively intact and ambulatory with supervision. R4's care plan dated 11/13/25 documents R4's behaviors of being aggressive and making inappropriate statements to others. R5's Medical Record documents R5 has diagnoses of Severe Dementia without Behaviors, Major Depressive Disorder and Dysphagia Oral Phase. R5's MDS dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a 30-day notice for an involuntary discharge for one of one resident (R1) reviewed for involuntary discharge in the sample list of seven.Findings includeThe facility's Immediate/Emergency Transfer and Discharge Policy dated September 2016 states To assure resident transfers and discharges will be conducted in accordance with residents' rights, physician's orders, and in such a manner as to maintain continuity of care for the resident.The Physician Order Sheet dated November 2025 documents R1 has the following diagnoses: Schizoaffective Disorder, Varicella without complications and Drug Induced Subacute Dyskinesia.R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documents, BIMs (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15, cognitively intact. The Facility Incident Report Final Report dated 11/15/25 documents R1 exited the building on 11/10/25 at 5:10 AM through the Southwest exit door and was found in a field about three blocks from the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement care planned interventions for dementia related wandering behavior for one of four residents (R3) reviewed for abuse in the sample list of seven. Findings include:The facility's undated Abuse Prevention Policy documents Resident Assessment: As part of the resident's life history on the admission assessment, comprehensive care plan, and MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessments, staff will identify residents with increased vulnerability for abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, history of trauma or misappropriation of resident property, who have needs, triggers and behaviors that might lead to conflict. Through the care planning process, staff will identify any problems, goals, and approaches, which would reduce the chances of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property for these residents. Staff will continue to monitor the goals and approaches on a regular basis and update as necessary.The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document a resident to resident altercation in the electronic medical record for two of four residents (R2, R3) reviewed for abuse in the sample list of seven. Findings include:The facility's State of Illinois Illinois Department of Public Health Long-Term Care Facility & IID -Serious Injury Incident Report dated 10/23/25 at 4:10 PM documents on 10/16/25 at 2:20 PM R2 open handed smacked R3 on R3's right upper arm. R2 stated R2 acted in retaliation claiming that R3 hit R2 first, however witnesses did not support that R3 hit R2. R2's and R3's electronic medical records (EMRs) did not include documentation of the 10/16/25 altercation. On 11/17/25 at 1:10 PM R2 stated R3 gets in people's rooms and sleeps in their beds and the facility hasn't done much about it. R2 stated there was one time that R3 got physical with R2 on an unidentified date. R3 tried to go into R2's room, R3 banged on my (R2's) arm, so I (R2) banged her (R3) back in the arm. On 11/17/25 at 1:27 PM V8 CNA confirmed V8 witnessed R2's/R3's altercation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the services of a registered nurse for eight consecutive hours seven days a week every twenty-four hours. This failure has the potential to affect all 65 residents who reside in the facility.The Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 9/7/25 documents 65 residents reside at the facility.The facility's Staffing Policy that is not dated was provided by V1 Administrator and documents that a Registered Nurse (RN) will be scheduled seven days a week at least one continuous (8) eight-hour shift. The facility's nursing work schedule for the month of August 2025 and September 2025 documents the facility did not have the services of a RN for eight consecutive hours on 8/25/25, 8/30/25, and 9/10/25. The facility's 24-Hour staffing sheet dated Wednesday, September 10, 2025, documents that there were no RN's scheduled during this 24-hour period. The facility assessment dated [DATE] documents that facility accepts residents with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement interventions and monitoring for hyponatremia (low sodium) with repeated hospitalizations for one of three residents (R40) reviewed for hospitalizations in the sample list of 33.R40's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R40 has moderate cognitive impairment.R40's September 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documents R40 receives the following psychotropic medications: Fluoxetine 60 milligrams (mg) by mouth (PO) daily, Mirtazapine 15 mg PO daily, Olanzapine 22.5 mg PO daily, Divalproex 500 mg PO twice daily, and Clorazepate Dipotassium 7.5 mg PO daily.R40's emergency room Discharge Instructions dated 5/2/25 documents the following: R40 had hyponatremia and urinary tract infection, follow up with V21 Physician within 2-4 days, and R40 will need sodium level rechecked as it was low today, 128 (normal range 135-145). Some seizure medications and antidepressants can affect sodium levels. Treatment for hyponatremia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), perform hand hygiene, properly disinfect equipment and maintain a urinary catheter bag off the floor for three of 17 residents (R12, R40, R43) reviewed for infection control in the sample list of 33. 1.) On 9/07/2025 at 8:31 AM R40's door contained a sign indicating R40 was on EBP and to wear gown and gloves for high contact care, including assistance with dressing, transfers, and care of indwelling devices. PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) was present in a container on R40's door. R40 was lying in bed and R40's urinary catheter drainage bag was on the side of the bed. R40 stated R40 has had the catheter for a few months and has had urinary tract infections (UTIs). R40 stated the staff do not wear gown and gloves when providing R40's cares. On 9/07/2025 at 9:03 AM V18 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) entered R40's room, transferred R40 out of bed and into the wheelchair, and changed R40's bed linens. V18 was not wearing gloves or a gown for this care. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to honor a female resident's request to have her shower done by female staff for one (R14) of one resident reviewed for choices on a sample list of 33.Findings include:The facility's Resident Rights Guideline dated 10/2023 documents that it is the practice of the facility to provide for an environment in which residents may exercise their rights, each day. Residents have certain rights and protections under Federal law. This policy documents that the facility will meet and provide these rights through care and related services at all times. R14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fifteen indicating that R14 has normal cognitive function.On 9/07/25 at 9:12 AM, R14 stated that she doesn't want V16 male Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) helping R14 with shower because V16 doesn't get R14 clean. R14 stated she told V11 CNA and R14 was told that R14 would have to take her shower in the evening if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide quarterly statements of personal funds accounts for two of two residents (R4, R8) reviewed for personal funds in the sample list of 33The facility's undated Quarterly Trust Statements Policy documents quarterly statements are sent out by the last day of the following month by the business office. This policy documents to make two copies of the statements, one to keep for records and one to give to the resident/responsible party. This policy documents to keep a spreadsheet and indicate next to the resident's name when a copy was mailed to the resident's representative, and attach a copy of the statement. This policy documents to have the resident sign his/her name on the spread sheet to indicate they received their quarterly statement and upload a copy of the statement into the resident's electronic medical record. 1.) On 9/7/25 at 8:59 AM R8 stated R8 has money in a personal funds account, but R8 does not know how much money is in the account…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer and bed hold for hospitalizations for one of three residents (R13) reviewed for hospitalizations in the sample list of 33. The facility's Bed Hold and readmission Policy dated November 2016 documents it is the facility's policy to readmit residents after hospitalization and the facility will hold a specific bed or make available the next semi-private accommodation if the resident chooses not to hold the specific bed. This policy documents the resident/representative shall be informed of this policy on admission and at the time of transfer to a hospital, and provided written notification at the time of transfer. This policy documents in the event of an emergency hospitalization the resident/representative can be notified by telephone and may verbally give the bed hold determination, which should be documented in the progress notes and follow up written confirmation may be required. On 9/07/2025 at 10:47 AM R13 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess/measure a pressure sore, administer a wound treatment according to physician's orders and accurately document the location of a pressure sore for one resident (R12) of two residents reviewed for pressure sores in a sample list of 33. Findings Include: R12's Care Plan updated 6/16/25 lists the following diagnoses: Hypomagnesemia, Chronic Pulmonary Edema, Quadriplegia, C5-C7 Complete, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, Seizures, Cauda Equina Syndrome, Zoster Encephalitis, and Primary insomnia. R12's MDS Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R12 is cognitively intact. R12's admission Skin assessment dated [DATE] documents a Superficial wound (to the) Right Gluteal Fold measuring 0.2cm (centimeters) in Length by 0.2cm in width by 0cm in depth. R12's Physician's Order sheet documents a physician's order started on 4/24/25 and discontinued on 5/15/25 R (right) upper thigh. Cleanse with normal saline. Apply Mepilex every day shift…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have physician's orders for the use and care of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) for one of one resident (R25) reviewed for CPAP use in the sample list of 33. The facility's CPAP/BiPAP (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure) Support policy dated April 2007 documents to review the physician's order to determine the oxygen flow rate and positive end-expiratory pressure settings. This policy includes to document a general assessment prior to the procedure, time/duration of therapy, CPAP settings, oxygen flow rate, oxygen saturation, and how the resident tolerated the procedure. On 9/07/2025 at 9:27 AM There was a CPAP machine on the overbed table next to R25's bed. The CPAP mask and tubing was in a plastic bag attached to the machine. R25 stated R25 has been in the facility for a few weeks and uses the CPAP at night. R25 stated the staff do not do any care for the CPAP. R25's active census documents R25 admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure physician visits are documented for one of three (R40) residents reviewed for hospitalization in the sample list of 33. The facility's undated Physician Services Policy documents It is the policy of this facility that each resident admitted to this facility is under the care of a physician licensed in the State and that all physician services will comply with State and Federal regulations for resident care in a licensed facility. The attending physician shall write a progress note at the time of each resident visit and review the resident's total program of care; i.e. (in other words) comprehensive assessments, care plans, medication and treatments, and approving such by signing and dating the current order recap.R40's active census documents R40 has resided in the facility since 2004 and V21 Physician/Medical Director is R40's primary physician. This census documents R40 was hospitalized six times within the last year. R40's electronic medical record does not contain any physician visit notes by V21 within the last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure timely physician visits for one of three residents (R40) reviewed for hospitalizations in the sample list of 33. The facility's undated Physician Services Policy documents It is the policy of this facility that each resident admitted to this facility is under the care of a physician licensed in the State and that all physician services will comply with State and Federal regulations for resident care in a licensed facility. The attending physician shall write a progress note at the time of each resident visit and review the resident's total program of care; i.e. (in other words) comprehensive assessments, care plans, medication and treatments, and approving such by signing and dating the current order recap. The attending physician shall certify upon admission and at each visit every 30/60 days thereafter what level of care the resident requires, and document the (reason) for a change in the progress notes.R40's active census documents R40 has resided in the facility since 2004 and V21 Physician/Medical Director is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed log infections, organisms, and antibiotics and ensure the appropriate antibiotics were administered for one (R40) of five residents reviewed for infection control on a sample list of 33. Findings include:The facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program Guidelines dated 4/29/2024 document that the purpose of the antimicrobial stewardship program is to improve antimicrobial stewardship practices and to monitor outcomes and antimicrobial use. This policy documents that the objective is that the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program will be to improve patient outcomes through optimization of antimicrobial therapy by selection of appropriate antibiotic dose, route, and duration of treatment, minimize the development of antimicrobial resistance by appropriately selecting antibiotics, and reduce the rates of facility-acquired infection. Guidelines document that the facility will monitor antibiotic use and outcomes from antibiotic use. The facility's Infection and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect resident's right to privacy. This failure affected two of four residents (R1, R2) reviewed for resident rights on the sample list of four. Findings Include:The facility's Resident Rights Guideline policy dated October 2023 documents the practice of this facility is to provide an environment in which residents may exercise their rights, each day. Residents have certain rights and protections under Federal law and the facility will always protect these rights through care and related services. One example of a resident's rights is Privacy and Confidentiality. R1's Medical Diagnoses List dated August 2025 documents R1 is diagnosed with Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, and Insomnia. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R1 is cognitively intact. R1's Behavior Tracking for July 2025 through August 2025 documents R1 exhibits behaviors of attention seeking, repetitive questions/statements, invading the personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect resident's right to be free from verbal abuse. This failure affected two of four residents (R1, R3) reviewed for resident rights on the sample list of four. Findings Include:The facility's undated Abuse policy documents Verbal Abuse is the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or families, or within their hearing distance, regardless of an individuals' age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Examples of verbal abuse include, but are not limited to, threats of harm, saying things to frighten a resident. R1's Medical Diagnoses List dated August 2025 documents R1 is diagnosed with Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, and Insomnia. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R1 is cognitively intact. R1's Behavior Tracking for July 2025 through August 2025 documents R1 exhibits behaviors of attention seeking, repetitive questions/statements,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident dignity for three of three residents (R4, R5, R6) reviewed for dignity in a sample list of seven residents.R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4 as cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R4 requires supervision with eating, oral hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene and bed mobility. R4's Care plan documents medical diagnoses as Thoracic Scoliosis, Depression, Neuropathy, Thrombophlebitis of Lower Extremities, Unsteady on Feet, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy and Major Depressive disorder. This same care plan initiated 11/8/24 does not document a focus area, goal nor interventions for R4's behaviors of consensual sexual behavior with male peers prior to 7/29/25. This same care plan documents R4 requires a wheelchair for mobility. R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R5 as cognitively intact. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R6 as cognitively intact. R4 and R5's shared…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by another resident. This failure affects two of four residents ( R2 and R7) reviewed for abuse in a sample list of eight residents. Findings include: The facility undated policy titled Abuse Prevention Policy documents abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish to a resident. The term willful in the definition of abuse means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict harm or injury. Verbal Abuse is the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or families, or within their hearing distance, regardless of an individuals' age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Examples of verbal abuse include, but are not limited to, threats of harm, saying things to frighten a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report allegations of verbal abuse to the Abuse Coordinator for three of four residents (R1, R2, R7) reviewed for abuse in a sample list of eight residents. Findings include: The facility undated policy titled Abuse Prevention Policy documents Employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property they observe, hear about, or suspect to the administrator immediately, to an immediate supervisor who must then immediately report it to the administrator or to a compliance hotline or compliance officer. In the absence of the administrator, reporting can be made to an individual who has been designated to act in the administrator's absence. 1. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R2 as cognitively intact. The facility was unable to provide documentation a resident (R2) to resident (R1) verbal altercation on 12/23/24 was reported to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse for eight consecutive hours per day seven days per week. This failure has the potential to affect all 69 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Nurses Schedule for October and November 2024 documents on 11/2/24, 11/5/24, and 10/29/24, there was not a registered nurse scheduled to work. The October Nurses Schedule documents on 10/27/24 there was a registered nurse working for four hours. On 11/8/24 at 9:15 AM, V1, Administrator, reviewed the Nurses Schedules and stated, I don't see an RN (Registered Nurse) on 11/3/(24), I don't see an RN on 11/5/(24), I don't see an RN on 10/29/(24). Correct on 10/27/(24) there was an RN for four hours. V1 further stated, We knew we would get this (citation), facilities are struggling with staffing. The facility's Form 802 Resident Matrix dated 11/6/24 documents 69 residents reside in the facility. The Department of Health and Human Services Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Certification and Transmittal dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent cross contamination during medication administration for four residents (R13, R56, R51, R270) out of six reviewed for medication administration in a sample list of 31 residents. Findings include: The facility policy titled Medication Administration revised 11/18/2017 documents appropriate hand washing is to be completed and/or alcohol based gel rub must be used throughout the medication pass. This should occur before and after medication pass and after touching an inanimate object possibly contaminated with microorganisms. Handwashing is not required per the Centers for Disease control (CDC) guidelines. It is acceptable to use alcohol based gel type solution between residents. The Facility Daily Midnight Census dated 11/6/2024 documents 69 residents reside in facility. On 11/7/24 at 7:22 AM V12 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administered R56's medications. V12 LPN did not wash hands nor use an alcohol based hand rub (ABHR) prior to administering R56's medications. V12 LPN then proceeded to administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a new Level 2 PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) to evaluate a resident's need for specialized mental health services upon the expiration of the initial Level 2 evaluation. This failure affects one resident (R28) out of 11 reviewed for pre-admission screening on the sample list of 31. Findings include: R28's Level 2 PASRR to evaluate for the need of specialized mental health services dated 8/17/2015 documents R28 had a history of inpatient mental health hospitalizations, experienced delusions, irritability, and difficulty remaining on tasks related to her medical diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia. This Level 2 screening had a determination date of 8/24/2015 and documented R28 required specialized services including mental health rehabilitation services, illness self-management, and community re-integration activities. This Level 2 screening documented this determination was valid for 90 days from the date of determination (11/22/2015), and a new determination should be obtained from the entity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a baseline careplan timely for one resident (R270) out of one reviewed for careplans in a sample list of 31 residents. Findings include: The facility policy titled Baseline Care Planning policy revised 3/16/22 documents the following procedure shall be utilized in developing a baseline careplan (BCP). A BCP shall be developed to include instructions needed to provide effective person centered care to each resident, based on his/her initial assessment and the professional standards of quality of care, to serve as a functional guide in delivery of care until such time as a comprehensive careplan is developed. R270's undated Face Sheet documents R270 admitted to facility on 10/31/24 with medical diagnoses of Wedge Compression Fracture of T9-T10 Vertebrae, Dementia, and Hypertension. R270's admission assessment dated [DATE] documents R270 is alert and oriented to person only. R270's Nurse Progress Note dated 11/4/24 at 5:42 AM documents 4:25 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement care planned post fall interventions for fall prevention. This failure affects one resident (R59) out of seven reviewed for falls on the sample list of 31. Findings include: On 11/6/24 at 10:43 AM, R59 was seated in her own room in a wheelchair. R59 had a power cord for a personal alarm hanging from the back of her wheelchair but the actual alarming module was not present. R59's Care Plan (undated) documents R59 experienced actual falls on 6/9/24 and 6/10/24. This care plan documents the post fall intervention from the fall on 6/9/24 was to provide an alarm on R59's wheelchair. R59's Nursing Progress Notes dated 6/9/24 documents R59 was seated in her wheelchair just prior to being noted on the floor sitting on her buttocks with her legs outstretched. R59's Nursing Progress Notes dated 6/10/24 documents R59 was sitting on her buttocks on the floor with her wheelchair next to her. On 11/6/24 at 11:00 AM, V4, Licensed Practical Nurse/ Care Plan Coordinator, reviewed R59's care plan and stated, Yes,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident bed side rails in a safe condition. This failure affects one resident (R12) of five reviewed for bed side rails in the sample list of 31. Findings include: R12's medical diagnosis list (11/7/2024) documents R12's diagnoses include: Extrapyramidal and Movement Disorder, Left Knee Valgus Deformity (abnormal angle to the lower leg), and Dementia. R12's quarterly assessment (9/11/2024) documents R12 has impaired range of motion in both lower extremities. R12's Fall Risk Evaluation (9/11/2024) documents R12 has a recent history of falling in the facility. R12's Bed Rail Evaluation (9/11/2024) documents R12's bed side rail serves as an enabler to promote independence in entering and/or exiting R12's bed. R12's Care Plan (11/7/2024) documents R12 utilizes a bed side rail for mobility and staff should encourage R12 to use the side rail to promote R12's independence. On 11/6/2024 at 10:11AM, R12's half-length right side bed rail was in the upward position. The rail appeared loose and was leaning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect a resident's (R2) right to be free from abuse by another resident (R1). This failure affects three (R1, R2, R3) of seven residents reviewed for abuse in the sample list of seven. Findings include: The facility's Final Report dated 8/15/24 documents on 8/8/24 at 8:25 AM staff serving breakfast witnessed R2 grab R1's oatmeal and R1 hit R2 on the right side of R2's face with an open hand. R1 and R2 were immediately separated and there was no injury or redness noted. The investigative file for this incident included interviews with R3, V6 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and V7 CNA that document they witnessed this incident and confirmed R2 grabbed R1's oatmeal and then R1 open handed smacked R2's face/head. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 has severe cognitive impairment and - BIMS 7, other behaviors occurred 1-3 days during review period. R2's MDS dated [DATE] documents R2 has short and long term memory loss. R2's Skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the administrator. This failure affects two (R2, R3) of seven residents reviewed for abuse in the sample list of seven. Findings include: On 8/20/24 at 9:39 AM R3 stated around a few weeks to a month ago R2 came into R3's room, R3 told R2 to leave R3's room which may have set (R2) off. R3 stated R2 then grabbed R3's wrist and R3 felt afraid of R2. R3 stated R3 staff responded to R3's call light and directed R2 out of R3's room, and R3 told V8 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) that R2 had grabbed R3's wrist. R3's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R3 is cognitively intact. R2's MDS dated [DATE] documents R2 has short and long term memory loss and wandered one to three days during the seven day lookback period. On 8/20/24 at 9:53 AM V8 CNA stated a few weeks ago R2 was lying in R3's bed while R3 was in the room, and staff had to redirect R2 out of the room. V8 denied being told that R2 grabbed R3. On 8/20/24 at 10:55…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from significant medication errors, by failing to correctly identify a resident prior to medication administration. This failure affects one resident (R1) out of seven reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet (undated) electronic Census Detail documents R1 was admitted to the facility for this residency on 9/28/23. R1's (undated) electronic Diagnoses List documents R1 experienced medical conditions including Congestive Heart Failure, Atrial Fibrillation, History of Myocardial Infarction, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Type 2 Diabetes, Anxiety, Hypertension, Coronary Artery Disease, and major Depression. R1's emergency room After Discharge Instructions dated 8/8/24 documents R1 was treated at the emergency room for an accidental medication overdose, requiring intravenous fluids, administration of intravenous Vitamin K 5 milligrams (mg) to reverse the effects of Coumadin (anticoagulant, blood thinner), 1,000 milliliters of normal saline, and oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to operationalize their abuse prevention policy by failing to document identified interventions for five (R2, R3, R4, R5 and R6) of nine residents reviewed for abuse from a total sample list of nine residents reviewed. Findings include: The facility provided Abuse Prevention Program Policy dated 11/28/16 documents that the facility affirms the right of residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse of our residents. This will be done by implementing systems to investigate all reports and allegations of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, abuse of residents and misappropriation of resident property by promptly and aggressively making the necessary changes to prevent future occurrences. Through the care planning process, staff will identify any problems, goals and approaches,which would reduce the changes of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0825 — patternProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure therapy services were provided for six residents (R2, R4, R19, R20, R21, R22) of six residents reviewed for therapy services on the sample list of 22. Findings include: 1. On 3/21/24 at 1:00 PM, R2 stated they quit giving R2 therapy and R2 does not know if they are going to start it again. R2 stated, when asked if R2 wants therapy, oh yes, I need to have it, I felt tremendously better when getting it. R2's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 12/1/23, documents Physical Therapy (PT) and Occupational Therapy (OT) evaluate and treat. R2's Therapy Past Appointments Sheet dated 2/19/24, documents (Therapy Provider) will no longer be the therapy provider starting 2/19/24. 2. On 3/21/24 at 12:42 PM, R4 stated R4 used to get therapy and then it just quit and R4 wants to resume therapy. R4 stated R4 needs that help because R4 has fallen and R4 has to get therapy. R4 stated they have not told R4 when therapy will start back up and that R4 has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free of verbal and physical abuse by another resident for two of three residents (R8 and R9) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 22. Findings include: The facility's abuse report dated 2/10/24, documents an altercation between R8 and R9. This report also documents R9 called R8 a derogatory name and R8 got up from her table and walked to R9's table and R8 pinched R9 on the right forearm. R8's current Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documents R8's diagnoses as: personal history of a Traumatic Brain Injury, Bipolar Disorder, and Depression. R8's Psychosocial Evaluation dated 1/3/24, documents R8 is easily distracted, has difficulty utilizing coping skills, difficulty with impulse control, difficulty with problem solving, has poor judgement, makes inappropriate comments, is depressed, anxious, and suspicious, and is physically aggressive. R8's Care Plan dated 3/12/24, documents R8 displays manipulative behaviors, is impatient, and has verbal outbursts. R9's current EMR documents R9's diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0659 — isolatedProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician discharge orders for two residents (R2, R3) of three residents reviewed for following physician discharge orders in the sample list of 22. Findings include: 1.) R2's current Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documents R2's diagnoses as: Osteomyelitis, wedge Compression Fracture of T11-T12 Vertebra subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, and Anemia. R2's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 1/1/24-1/31/24, documents Aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) oral tablet chewable, give one tablet by mouth one time a day and Apixaban (Eliquis) (anticoagulant-blood thinner) oral tablet 5 mg give one tablet by mouth two times a day with a start date of 11/1/23. There are no documented orders on this same POS to stop Apixaban (Eliquis) (anticoagulant) at any time. R2's Care Plan dated 2/27/24, documents R2 is on an anticoagulant. The Health Status Note dated 1/9/24 documents R2 had an unwitnessed fall in R2's room with a head laceration and R2 was sent the the Emergency Department. R2's Emergency Documentation notes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-01 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a properly functioning call light system for four (R1, R5, R6, R7) residents out of four residents reviewed for call lights in a sample list of seven residents. Findings include: 1. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 as independent in decision making. On 11/30/23 at 1:20 PM R1's call light was activated by R1. R1's call light turned on a light above R1's door but was not audible. On 11/30/23 at 1:25 PM the Call Light System was not functioning as it was supposed to on the facility South Unit. South Unit call lights were observed with lights above the rooms but without sound. On 11/30/23 at 1:05 PM R1 stated What happens if I am in the shower or something and I fall. Who is going to come help me if they (staff) don't know the light is even on? We (residents) deserve to have it fixed. 2.) R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R5 as cognitively intact. On 11/30/23 at 11:38 PM R5's call light was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal and mental abuse by staff for two of four residents (R1, R2) reviewed for abuse in a sample list of seven residents. Findings include: The facility policy titled 'Abuse Prevention Program' dated 11/28/2016 documents the facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined below. Verbal abuse is the oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. 1.) R1's undated Face Sheet documents R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder, Adjustment Disorder with mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood, Borderline Personality Disorder, Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalgias, Malignant Neoplasm of Brain, and Post Traumatic Stress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely report allegations of abuse to the abuse coordinator for two of four residents (R1, R2) reviewed for abuse in a sample list of seven residents. Findings include: The facility policy titled 'Abuse Prevention Program' dated 11/28/2016 documents the facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined below. Verbal abuse is the oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Employees are required to immediately report any occurrences of potential/alleged mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, and abuse of residents and misappropriation of resident property they observe, hear about, or suspect to a supervisor and the Administrator. Supervisors should immediately inform the administrator and his/her designated representative of all reports of potential/alleged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a staff member was removed from resident care after an allegation of staff to resident abuse for one of one residents (R2) reviewed for abuse on the sample list of seven. Findings include: R2's Final Incident Report to the State Agency dated 10/20/23 documents On 10/16/23 (R2) self reported (V5) Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) called him a f. (R2) stated he had not reported to anyone prior. (R2) reported he was up at the nurses' station getting a snack when (V5) CNA called him a f, then (V6) Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) said 'he heard what you said.' (R2) states he is 99% sure (V5) was talking to him. (V7) Unit Aide stated (V5, V6) were talking on the phone to a male and heard (V5) start to say f but then stopped because she realized (R2) was there. On 12/1/23 at 1:30 PM R2 stated (V5) was on her personal cellular phone when I wheeled up to the nurses station (North Unit) where (V5) was standing on the phone. R2 stated (V5) knows I am gay. (V5) called me a f. (V5) tried to cover it up by saying she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-04 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to follow residents' rights by not allowing residents to receive their mail on Saturdays. This failure has the potential to affect all 77 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Resident Council meeting held on 10/3/23 at 10:00 AM consisted of R72, R48, R21, and R10 (Resident Council President). All four residents stated they do not receive mail on Saturdays because there is no one from Activities here on the weekends to distribute it. On 10/4/23 at 9:00 AM, V12 Activity Director stated that they should be delivering mail on Saturdays. V12 stated that V12 is the only Activity person right now and V12 does not work on the weekends. On 10/04/23 at 9:04 AM, V1 Administrator stated that there is no one to pass out mail on the weekends so residents are not getting their mail on Saturdays. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report dated 10/2/23 documents 77 residents reside in the facility.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-04 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to post daily staffing. This failure has the potential to affect all 77 residents residing in facility. Findings include: The facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report dated 10/2/23 documents 77 residents reside in facility. On 10/2/23 upon entry into the facility there was no posted staffing located anywhere in the lobby or office areas. On 10/4/23 at 8:30 AM, there is still no posted staffing located anywhere in the lobby or office areas of the facility. On 10/4/23 at 8:49 AM, V1 Administrator confirmed the daily staffing is not posted. V1 stated that it should be posted outside of V1's office in the lobby area. V1 stated that the night nurse is responsible for completing and posting it.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to maintain resident rooms in a safe sanitary home like manner for five (R59, R53, R15, R42, R19) of 18 residents reviewed for environment in a sample list of 44 residents. Findings include: 1. On 10/2/23 at 10:00 AM, R15 and R19 were in their room watching TV. R15 was in the bed by the door. R19 was in the bed by the window. Between their beds was a third empty bed. This bed did not have a mattress and metal springs were exposed. A window type air conditioner was lying face down in the middle of the bed on top of the exposed springs. R19 stated That broken air conditioner has set there for weeks. I'm getting tired of looking at it. Would you want that in your bedroom? They put the new one in and just left it there. R19's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R19 is cognitively intact. 2. On 10/2/23 at 10:00 AM, R42 and R59 were in their room watching TV. A small window unit air conditioner was in the window by R59's bed. The unit was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-04 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3.) R11's EHR documents R11's last completed and submitted Quarterly Minimum Data Set is dated 6/8/23. R11's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents it is still in progress and has not been completed and submitted. Sections B, C, D and Q are incomplete on this assessment.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments every three months for four (R53, R50, R11, R24) of 18 residents reviewed for Minimum Data Set assessments on the sample list of 44. Findings include: The facility's Comphrehensive Assessment/MDS (Minimum Data Set) policy with a revision dated of 11/1/2017 documents, The MDS shall be re-evaluated according to the following schedule. a. Quarterly-within 92 of previous ARD (Assessment Reference Date)/MDS. 1. R53's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documents an admission MDS was completed for R53 on 5/24/2023. R53's EHR documents R53's quarterly assessment was due on 8/23/23. This screen documents this annual assessment is still in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-04 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete comphrehensive minimum data set assessments within 14 days of admission and every 12 months for two (R27, R178) of 18 residents reviewed for Minimum Data Set assessments on the sample list of 44. Findings include: The facility's Comphrehensive Assessment/MDS (Minimum Data Set) policy with a revision date of 11/1/2017 documents, Each Resident residing in this facility for a full 14 days shall have a MDS initiated by the 13th day after admission, and a RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) completed by the 14th day after admission. admission applies to: a. First admission to the facility, or b. Subsequent admissions to the facility. This policy also documents, The MDS shall be re-evaluated according to the following schedule. a. Quarterly-within 92 of previous ARD (Assessment Reference Date)/MDS b. Annually- within 366 days of previous Comprehensive ARD/MDS. 1. R27's Electronic Health Record documents R27's had an annual comphrehensive MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a resident centered psychiatric treatment plan for serious mental illness for two (R70, R59) of three residents reviewed for PASARR screens in a sample list of 44 residents. Findings Include: 1. On 10/2/23 at 12:06 PM, R70 was in R70's room which was on a locked unit designated for individuals with serious mental illness. R70's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) dated 6/7/23 documents R70 suffers from Schizophrenia and requires specialized mental health care to treat this condition. R70's medical record does not document an interdisciplinary treatment plan to address R70's serious mental illness. On 10/4/23 at 10:00 AM V4, Care Plan Coordinator stated she was not aware individuals diagnosed with mental illness had to have a treatment plan. 2. On 10/2/23 at 10:00 AM, R59 was watching television in R59's room which was on a locked unit designated for individuals with serious mental illness. R59's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) dated 7/31/23 documents R59 suffers from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop care plans with interventions for cigarette smoking. This failure has the potential to affect two of two residents (R8, R54) reviewed for smoking in a sample list of 44 residents. Findings Include: 1. On 10/2/23 at 10:30AM R8 stated I am going out to smoke. R8 was observed receiving a cigarette which was to be lighted when he went to the smoking area. R8's Smoking evaluation dated 6/28/23 documents Smoking materials kept by staff and dispensed at designated times. R8's Care Plan updated 8/23/23 does not include interventions to address R8's smoking.2. On 10/02/23 at 10:50 AM, R54 was smoking cigarettes in the smoking area unsupervised. R54's smoking assessment dated [DATE] documents R54 requires supervision while smoking. R54's Electronic Health Record does not contain a care plan for smoking.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete psychotropic medication assessments for three (R49, R58, and R24) of five residents reviewed for psychotropic medications on the sample list of 44. Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Medication policy with a revision date of 6/17/22 documents, 4. Initiate a Psychotropic Medication Quarterly Evaluation within 14 days of admission for those resident currently receiving psychotropic medication. 1. R49's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 10/1/23 through 10/31/23 documents R49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. This MAR documents R49 is receiving one 0.5 milligram (MG) tablet of Xanax (Antianxiety medication) three times a day, one 40 mg tablet of Paxil (Antidepressant one time a day, and one 100 mg tablet of Trazodone (antidepressant) at bedtime. This MAR documents R49's Xanax was ordered on 4/28/23, the Paxil was ordered on 4/29/23, and the Trazodone was ordered on 4/28/23. R49's medical record does not include an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to initiate contact and droplet isolation and conduct a PCR (Polymerase chain reaction) test when respiratory symptoms were present and failed to post isolation signs for two of two (R67, R128) residents reviewed for isolation on the sample list of 44. Findings include: The facility's COVID-19 Control Measures policy with a revision date of 5/19/23 documents, 4. If a resident is displaying symptoms of COVID-19 and has an antigen test that is negative, the resident must be PCR (Polymerase chain reaction) tested and is to remain on TBP (transmission based precautions) until the test results are received. 1. On 10/3/23 from 9:00 AM to 3:00 PM, R67's bedroom door was open and R67 coughed forcefully all day long. R67's door room indicated that R67 was in isolation due to the cough. On 10/3/23 at 1:41 PM, V1 Administrator was notified that R67 had been coughing all day long. On 10/3/23 at 3:10 PM, a gown was hanging on the outside of R67's door. The door did not have a sign or indicate why a gown was hanging on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to HAVEN HEALTHCARE — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ECAPITAL HEALTHCARE CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/01/2024 |
| GLAT, DAVID | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/10/2025 |
| MASON, PAULA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| ZAMAN, ASAD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| KATZ, HAROLD | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| ROTHNER, WILLIAM | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| HAVEN HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| ISRAEL, LEVI | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $823K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146050. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.