The Haven Of St. Elmo
221 East Cumberland, St Elmo, IL 62458 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (618) 829-5581 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (28) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $14,015 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-07)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.4% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.7% | 6.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 6.8% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 72.9% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.6% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 33.6% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.9% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.7% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.1% | 21.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.4% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 45.5% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.1% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 21.3% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.98 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.32 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.5%CMS range 28.6–58.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 7.2–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.6%CMS range 5.4–14.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.14 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 39.9 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.03 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.14 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
28 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to identify infectious disease symptoms as well as track, report, treat and isolate infected residents to prevent urinary tract infections for 4 (R1, R3, R6, R23) of 4 residents reviewed for infection control. This failure has the potential to affect all 33 residents in the facility. This failure resulted in R1 being admitted to the hospital on [DATE] for developing sepsis related to a urinary tract infection (UTI), R3 admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with developing a complicated urinary tract infection, and R23 being admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with an acute metabolic encephalopathy secondary to UTI complicated by bilateral ureter stents and history of UTI caused by a multidrug-resistant organism.The failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy which was identified to have begun on 3/29/26 at 10:30 am when R23 returned to the facility after a hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to complete skin and wound assessments for a resident at risk for skin breakdown, failed to notify the physician of a new wound, and failed to identify worsening of a wound for 1 (R1) of 1 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 25. This failure resulted in R1 developing a stage 2 pressure ulcer that worsened to the right buttock and developed a new stage 2 pressure ulcer to the left buttock.The Findings Include:R1's admission Record documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis due to Escherichia Coli, urinary tract infection, bacteremia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, unspecified dislocation of right hip, depression, hypothyroidism, venous insufficiency, and obstructive sleep apnea.R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 05/18/2026 documented R1's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 indicating R1 is cognitively intact. The same MDS documents that R1 is occasionally incontinent of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer an antianxiety medication for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for medication errors in the sample of 9. The failure resulted in R1 developing withdrawal symptoms including nausea, vomiting, shaking, agitation, and being admitted to the local hospital for 2 days.This past noncompliance occurred between 4/22/26 and 4/29/26.Findings include: R1's admission Record documented an admission date to the facility on 9/27/2024 and included diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, unsteadiness on feet, cerebral infarction, unspecified, insomnia and anxiety disorder, unspecified.R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R1's cognition is intact. Under Section N, High-Risk Drug Classes the MDS documented R1 takes an antianxiety medication.R1's Care Plan documented a Focus Area of diagnosis of anxiety and is in need of anti-anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer sliding scale insulin and monitor blood sugars as directed per physician's orders for 1 (R6) of 1 resident reviewed for insulin in a sample of 39. This failure resulted in R6 being sent to the emergency room for hyperglycemia. Findings include: R6's admission Record documents an admission date of 10/30/24 with diagnoses including: type 2 diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis without coma, dysphagia, lack of coordination, major depressive disorder, dementia, anxiety disorder, and acute kidney failure. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 12 indicating R6 has moderate cognitive impairment. R6's Progress Note dated 12/25/24 at 6:30 AM documents res (resident) accu check results read Hi called V26-Physician) on call service (Nurse Practitioner) gave order to send to ER for eval and tx (treatment). R6's Progress Note dated 12/30/24 at 2:10 PM documents res (resident) transported back…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to follow standards of practice for antibiotic use for 2 (R7, R23) of 2 residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in the sample of 25. This has the potential to affect all 33 residents living in the facility. Findings included:1. R7's admission Record documented an admission date of 8/6/2024 with diagnosis including type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, retention of urine, overactive bladder, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms and dysphagia.R7's MDS (minimum data set) dated 5/15/2026 documented a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Score of 04 indicating R7 is severely cognitively impaired. Section GG documents R7 is Dependent for assistance with toileting hygiene and showering/bathing self. Section H under Urinary Continence is documented with frequently incontinent.R7's Care Plan documented a focus area of general weakness, unsteadiness and endurance and is in need of staff assistance to meet his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely acquisition of a medication refill resulting in missed doses of a controlled substance for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 9. This past noncompliance occurred between 4/22/26 and 4/29/26. Findings included:R1's admission Record documented admission to the facility on 9/27/2024 and included diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, unsteadiness on feet, cerebral infarction, unspecified, insomnia, and anxiety disorder, unspecified. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R1's cognition is intact. Under Section N, High-Risk Drug Classes, the MDS documented R1 was taking an antianxiety medication. R1's Physician Order Summary (POS) documented a discontinued order of Diazepam 5 MG (milligram) tablet by mouth four times a day (8:00 AM, 12PM, 4PM, 8PM) related to anxiety disorder with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident to resident sexual and physical abuse for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2 and R3) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. Findings include:1. The Facility's Final Reportable Event dated 4/16/2026 documented in part: R2 an [AGE] year-old female with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 5 and a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease was observed engaging in inappropriate sexual behavior of an oral nature with R1 a [AGE] year-old male with a BIMS score of 2 and a diagnosis of dementia. Upon discovery, staff immediately intervened and separated both residents. There was no evidence of force, coercion, threat, or distress observed in either resident at the time of the incident. Investigation confirmed R1 and R2 had an established friendly relationship and had not previously demonstrated sexually inappropriate behavior. Based on the findings this incident is not substantiated as willful abuse.R1's admission Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of sexual abuse and physical abuse to the administrator immediately for 2 (R1 and R3) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. Findings included:1. R1's Progress Note dated 4/8/2026 at 5:49 PM by V6 (Registered Nurse/RN) was lined out for incomplete documentation but included: Res (resident) found in female res room with his penis in her mouth. Res separated and this res sat in DR (dining room) with staff. No adverse effects noted. This note had a strike out date of 4/10/2026 at 9:04 AM. On 4/22/2026 at 11:12 AM, V1 (Vice President of Operations) stated, she received an email on 4/9/2026 from V3 (Director of Nursing/DON) notifying her of the interaction between R1 and R2 the evening before. V1 stated, V2 did communicate in the email that R1 and R2 had been in R2's room, when V11 walked in and found R2 sitting on the bed with R1 standing in front of her with his pants down and R2 having her lips on R1's penis. 2. R1's Progress Note dated 4/13/2026 at 7:02 PM by V18 (Licensed Practical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical abuse for 1 (R3) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. Findings include: R1's Progress Note dated 4/13/2026 at 7:02 PM by V18 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) documented R1 had been up walking about the facility. R1 entered another male resident room and slams the door shut behind him. Staff had been alerted and observed R1 standing in another resident room yelling out and R3 stated that R1 had stricken him in the face. V19 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) was able to redirect R1 out of R3's room and offered a snack and drink. R1 is currently sitting in dining room, awaiting new orders. Will continue to keep close observation and encourage R1 to stay out of other residents room without their permission. On 4/21/2026 at 12:47 PM, R3 who was alert to person, place and time, stated R1 did come into his room last week on 4/13/2026, slammed his door and when he asked R1 to open his door back up, R1 slapped him across the face. R3 stated, he reported the incident to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents timely. This failure has the potential to affect all 46 residents currently residing at the facility. Findings include:1.R1's admission Record with a print date of 8/21/25 documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include metabolic encephalopathy, adult failure to thrive, mild protein calorie malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, mild intellectual disability, anemia, cognitive communication deficit, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, history of falls, edema, dementia, and peripheral vascular disease. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07, indicating a severe cognitive deficit. R1's Order Recap Report dated 6/1/25 to 8/31/25 includes the following physician orders. Insulin Glargine subcutaneous solution 100 unit/ml (milliliters) (Insulin Glargine) Inject 5 unit subcutaneously at bedtime related to Type 2 Diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow physician orders for administration of treatments to wounds for 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 11. Finding include:R1's admission Record with a print date of 8/21/25 documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include metabolic encephalopathy, adult failure to thrive, mild protein calorie malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, mild intellectual disability, anemia, cognitive communication deficit, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, history of falls, edema, dementia, and peripheral vascular disease. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07, indicating a severe cognitive deficit. This same MDS documents R1 is dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers. This MDS documents R1 has current pressure ulcers and is at risk of developing pressure ulcers. R1's current Care Plan documents Focus areas of, The resident has Stage 2 pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in the time frame ordered for 3 of 3 (R1, R2, and R3) residents reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 11. Findings include:1.R1's admission Record with a print date of 8/21/25 documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include metabolic encephalopathy, adult failure to thrive, mild protein calorie malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, mild intellectual disability, anemia, cognitive communication deficit, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, history of falls, edema, dementia, and peripheral vascular disease. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07, indicating a severe cognitive deficit. R1's Order Recap Report dated 6/1/25 to 8/31/25 includes the following physician orders. Insulin Glargine subcutaneous solution 100 unit/ml (milliliters) (Insulin Glargine) Inject 5 unit subcutaneously at bedtime related to Type 2 Diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to provide timely care to the residents. This has the potential to affect all 42 residents who currently reside at the facility. Findings Include: The facility Resident Matrix dated 5/12/25 documents 42 resident currently reside at the facility. 1. R20's admission Record with a print date of 5/14/25 documents R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include hypertension, repeated falls, pain, and kidney stones. R20's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 2/20/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R20 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R20 requires supervision or touching assistance for toilet transfer and partial/moderate assistance for toilet hygiene. R20's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of Due to (R20)'s general weakness and unsteadiness, He is in need of staff assistance to meet his toileting needs. Date Initiated: 07/03/2023. The interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect the rights of 4 of 4 residents (R6, R20, R21, and R39) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 39. Findings Include: 1. R20's admission Record with a print date of 5/14/25 documents R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include hypertension, repeated falls, pain, and kidney stones. R20's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 2/20/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R20 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R20 requires supervision or touching assistance for toilet transfer and partial/moderate assistance for toilet hygiene. R20's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of Due to (R20)'s general weakness and unsteadiness, He is in need of staff assistance to meet his toileting needs. Date Initiated: 07/03/2023. The interventions documented for this Focus area includes, .Provide assistance for toileting due to (R20)'s general weakness and history of falling and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 14 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure toileting assistance was provided timely for 2 of 3 (R20 and R21) residents reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 39. Findings Include: 1. R20's admission Record with a print date of 5/14/25 documents R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include hypertension, repeated falls, pain, and kidney stones. R20's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 2/20/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R20 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R20 requires supervision or touching assistance for toilet transfer and partial/moderate assistance for toilet hygiene. R20's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of Due to (R20)'s general weakness and unsteadiness, He is in need of staff assistance to meet his toileting needs. Date Initiated: 07/03/2023. The interventions documented for this Focus area include, .Provide assistance for toileting due to (R20)'s general weakness and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a plan of care for a resident with dementia for one (R6) of one resident reviewed for dementia care in a sample of 39. Findings include: R6's admission Record documents an admission date of 10/30/24 with diagnoses including: type 2 diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis without coma, dysphagia, lack of coordination, major depression disorder, dementia, depression, anxiety disorder,and acute kidney failure. R6 Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a BIMS summary score (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 12 indicating resident is moderately cognitively impaired. R6's current Care Plan does not document any area addressing a diagnosis of dementia or care needs resulting thereof. On 05/12/25 at 10:17 AM, R6 was observed just sitting in the dining room on the Dementia unit at the table. R6 had nothing in front of her and was doing nothing but sitting. On 05/14/25 at 11:15 AM, R6 was observed just sitting in the dining room on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were followed for 2 of 3 (R12 and R34) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 39. Findings Include: 1. R12's admission Record with a print date of 5/15/25 documents R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include a Stage 4 pressure ulcer of the sacrum. R12's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 2/17/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R12 is cognitively intact. R12's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of Enhanced barrier precautions r/t (related to) chronic wounds and indwelling catheter Date Initiated: 04/24/2024. This same Focus area includes the following interventions, .Gown and glove during high contact resident care activities such as dressing, bathing, showering, transferring, providing hygiene, changing linens, changing briefs or assisting with toileting, device care/use, wound care (any chronic skin opening).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based in interview and record review the facility failed to provided the services of a Registered Nurse for 8 consecutive hours per day 7 days a week. This failure has the potential to effect all 43 residents living at this facility. Findings Included: On 7/23/2024 at 1:10pm, V1 (Administrator) said the facility did not have the required 8 hours per day 7 days a week of Registered Nurse coverage. V1 said they did not have a policy for Registered Nurse coverage. On 7/22/2024 at 8:30am, V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse) said she worked the weekend of 7/20/24 and 7/21/24 and the facility did not have a Registered Nurse working on either of those days. V10 said frequently the facility does not have Registered Nurse coverage on the weekends she works. The facility nursing schedule for May, June and July of 2024 revealed the facility did not have the required 8 hours of Registered Nurse coverage for the following dates: 5/11, 5/25, 5/26, 6/8, 6/9, 6/22, 6/23, 6/29, 6/30, 7/6, 7/20, and 7/21. The Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid (Form CMS 671) dated 7/22/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-24 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide food with the prescribed texture of mechanical soft for 4 residents (R30, R29, R33 and R10) of 4 residents reviewed for diets in a sample of 35. Findings include: 1. R30's face sheet documents diagnoses including: dementia, dysphagia, Alzheimer's disease, and protein calorie malnutrition. R30's Medication Review Report dated 07/24/24 documents a dietary order dated 07/11/22 of regular diet: mechanical soft texture with an order status of active. R30's care plan documents a focus area dated 07/11/22 of: R30 has no teeth and does not use dentures and as a result she is noted to be at risk for dental complications. Documented interventions include: therapeutic mechanically altered diet per doctor's orders. R30's care plan also documents a focus are of: R30 is in need of a therapeutic increased calorie diet to meet her nutritional needs with a dated initiated of 12/20/22. Documented interventions include: therapeutic increased calorie,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to provide timely assistance for 3 (R30, R33, and R21) of 4 residents reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care in a sample of 35. Findings include: 1. R30's face sheet documents diagnoses including: dementia, dysphagia, Alzheimer's disease, protein calorie malnutrition, schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, seizures, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic kidney disease. R30 care plan documents a focus area dated 02/13/24 of due to (R30's) general weakness, unsteadiness, endurance and severe cognitive deficits, she is in need of staff assistance to complete her functional abilities with an intervention dated 02/13/24 of (R30's) usual performance to complete her eating is dependent. R30's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) dated [DATE] (signed 07/22/24) documents a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 03 indicating severe impairment. Section GG of the same MDS documents that R30 requires partial/moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to monitor and report vomiting and food regurgitation episodes for 1 (R29) of 11 resident reviewed for dining in a sample of 35. Findings include: R29's face sheet documents diagnoses including: Alzheimer's disease, dementia, disorder of urea cycle metabolism, anemia, cerebrovascular disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), syncope and collapse, and presence of cardiac pacemaker. R29's care plan documents a focus area dated 05/11/22 of (R29) has the diagnosis of GERD and is in need of a proton pump inhibitor medication to treat his condition with a goal of Through the continued use of his gastric medication, (R29) will remain free of GERD complications through next review. Documented interventions dated 03/12/21 include monitor/document/report PRN (as needed) s/sx (signs or symptoms) of GERD: belching, coughing/chocking when laying down,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for 1 (R24) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a sample of 35. Findings Included: R24's admission Record documents an admission date of 8/2/23 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, recurrent, mild; schizophrenia, unspecified; insomnia, and nutritional anemia, unspecified. R24's Medication Review Report with a print date of 7/24/24 documents an order for Doxepin 6 milligrams (MG) 1 tablet at bedtime with a start date of 8/29/2023, Quetiapine Fumarate 300MG 1 tablet daily with a start date of 8/04/2023, and Alprazolam (Xanax) 2MG tablet three times a day with a start date of 8/17/2023. On 7/22/2024 at 1:03 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that R24 had a comprehensive list of gradual reduction review reminders for psychotropic and sedative mediations on 2/26/2024 that included Quetiapine 300 MG, Doxepin 6 MG and Xanax 2 MG form from the pharmacy. V2 stated she has no documentation from V13 (Mental Health Family Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain aseptic technique while performing catheter for 1 of 2 residents (R6) reviewed for catheter/ incontinence care in a sample of 35. Findings include: R6's Face Sheet documents an admission date to the facility of 3/18/24 with diagnoses including: type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, urinary tract infection, site not specified, muscle weakness, chronic kidney disease, and flaccid neuropathic bladder, not elsewhere classified. R6's Order Summary Report with a print date of 7/24/24 documents an order of catheter care per facility policy every 24 hours as needed dated 5/20/2024. R6's Care Plan dated 7/05/2024 documents a focus area of (R6) has the diagnosis of Neurogenic bladder and is in need of an indwelling, foley catheter to meet his urinary drainage needs. Documented interventions include Catheter care as scheduled per facility policy with an initiation date 2/21/24. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided per current standards of practice for 2 of 3 (R2 and R3) residents reviewed for incontinence care in the sample of 7. Findings Include: 1. R2's admission Record with a print date of 3/7/24 documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease and weakness. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 2/15/24 documents R2 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 06, which indicates a moderate cognitive impairment. This same MDS documents R2 is dependent on staff for toileting. R2's current Care Plan documents a Focus Area of Due to R2's general weakness, unsteadiness and impaired cognitive function, she is in need of staff assistance to complete her functional abilities. The interventions for this focus area include, R2's usual performance to complete her toileting hygiene is: dependent. On 3/6/24 at 8:56 PM, R2 was laying in bed, covered with blankets.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple occupancy resident bedrooms for 4 (R9, R10, R19 and R24) of 4 residents reviewed for room size in a sample of 25.On 6/5/26 at 10:00 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated the dementia unit rooms 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and main hall rooms (not on the dementia unit) 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 were all waivered rooms and don't meet the proper room size requirements. On 6/5/26 at 10:15 AM, R19 and R24's double occupancy room was observed with V1, who stated the room was less than 80 square feet per resident bed. V1 used the measuring tape to measure the length and width of R19 and R24's room and stated it was 11 by 14 feet, indicating that the room was 177 square (sq.) feet (ft.), or 77 sq. ft. per bed. The measurements did not include the closet. At that time, R19 was in her room and stated she had no issues with the room size. The room contained two beds, two nightstands, a recliner, 2 chest of drawers, a wheelchair, 2 walkers and 2 over the bed tables. At…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet per resident in two multiple occupancy resident bedrooms for 4 of 4 residents (R5, R20, R145, R146) reviewed for room size in a sample of 39. Findings include: Observation on 5/14/2025 at 9:00am revealed R5 and R20 share a bedroom with two beds, two dressers, a recliner, two walking assistive devices, two over the bed tables and had limited area to move around inside the room. Observations on 5/14/2025 at 9:05am revealed R145 and R146 share a bedroom with two bed, three small dressers, two over the bed tables, one recliner and had limited area to move around inside the room. On 5/14/2025 at 9:30am R5, R20, R145 and R146 all voiced no concerns with the size of their rooms during interviews. During a tour with V3 (Maintenance Director) on 5/14/2025 at 9:00am, V3 was asked to measure R5, R20, R145 and R146's bedroom sizes. V3 used a measuring tape to measure the length and width of R5 and R20's bedroom and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-07-24 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and observations, the facility failed to prominently post the daily nurse staffing data which includes the facility's name, date, census and the total number and actual hours worked per shift for licensed and unlicensed staff responsible for resident care. This failure has the potential to affect all 43 residents who reside at this facility. Findings included: On 7/21//2024 at 11:00am and 1:00pm, the facility was observed to not have a Daily Nurse Staffing data sheet posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. On 7/23/2024 at 10:00ampm, V1 (Administrator) said She didn't know the facility was not posting Daily Nurse Staffing data and thus have not been doing it. On 7/22/2024 at 10:30am, V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse) said she works the dayshift at this facility as a full time nurse. V10 said she has never seen the Daily Nurse Staffing data posted while working at this facility. On 7/22/2024 at 9:30am and 2:00pm the facility did not have a Daily Nurse Staffing data sheet posted in a prominent place readily accessible to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet per resident in two multiple occupancy resident bedrooms. This affected 4 of 4 (R6, R23, R28 and R11) residents reviewed for room sizes in a sample of 35. Findings include: Observation on 7/23/2024 at 9:00am revealed R6 and R23 share a bedroom with two beds, two dressers, a recliner, two walking assistive devices, two over the bed tables and had limited area to move around inside the room. Observations on 7/23/2024 at 9:05am revealed R28 and R11 share a bedroom with two beds, one large recliner, two dressers, two walking assistive devices, to over the bed tables and had limited area to move around inside the room. During a tour with V7 (Maintenance Director) on 7/23/2024 at 9:00am, V7 was asked to measure R6, R23, R28 and R11's bedroom sizes. V7 used a measuring tape to measure the length and with of R6 and R23's bedroom and stated, 11 by 14 feet (which is the equivalent to 154 sq. ft. (square feet)/77 sq.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$14,015 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $14,015 — penalty dated 2026-05-07
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to HAVEN HEALTHCARE — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISRAEL, LEVI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 03/01/2025 |
| ECAPITAL HEALTHCARE CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| GLAT, DAVID | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| BLAIN, MICHELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| FLICK, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| KATZ, HAROLD | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| ROTHNER, WILLIAM | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| HAVEN HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $888K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145857. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.