The Haven Of Bridgeport

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 71.7 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.59 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.55 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.73 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was properly restrained while being transported in the facility van for 2 (R1 and R4) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents in a sample of 4. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a laceration to her head requiring 14 staples and 8 sutures, a fracture to the second digit of the right foot, left nasal bone fracture with deviation of the septum, and bruising to the lower abdomen and upper thighs. Findings include: 1. R1's admission Record documented an admission date of 11/30/20 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, difficulty in walking, unsteadiness on feet. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R1 was cognitively intact. On 12/19/24 at 10:25 AM, R1 was sitting in a wheelchair and had bruising noted below both eyes and a pink scar on her forehead disappearing into her hair line. R1 said she was involved in an accident in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to safely transfer and immediately report a fall for one (R22) of seven residents reviewed for risk of falls in the sample of 34. This failure resulted in R22 falling against the toilet during a one assist transfer and sustaining a rib fracture with resulting pain. This past noncompliance occurred between 6/17/23 and 7/12/23. Findings include: R22's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 6/10/23 and diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes Type 2, and Heart Failure. R22's 6/30/23 Care Plan dated documented a problem area, I am at risk for falls related to unsteady gait/balance, (and a) history of falls. R22's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documented a score of 11, indicating that R22 is at risk for falls. R22's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented that R22 requires extensive assistance from at least two staff members for transfers and toileting. Nurses Notes documented the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure they had sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents timely for 4 of 4 (R1, R2, R13, and R14) residents reviewed for staffing in the sample of 14. This has the potential to affect all 67 residents who currently reside at the facility.Findings Include:The facility Resident Matrix dated 1/5/2026 documents 67 residents currently reside at the facility.1. R2's admission Record with a print date of 1/6/26 documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes morbid obesity, unsteadiness on feet, heart disease, and osteoarthritis.R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/31/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R2 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R2 is occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder.R2's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of I am occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. Date Initiated: 11/01/2025. This Focus area includes interventions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered timely for 4 of 4 (R1, R2, R13, and R14) residents reviewed for call lights in the sample of 14. Findings Include:1. R2's admission Record with a print date of 1/6/25 documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes morbid obesity, unsteadiness on feet, heart disease, and osteoarthritis.R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/31/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R2 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R2 is occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder.R2's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of I am occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. Date Initiated: 11/01/2025. This Focus area includes intervention of, .Ensure call light is within reach and answer promptly. Date Initiated: 11/01/2025.On 1/5/26 at 11:38 AM, R2 stated it sometimes takes a long time for facility staff to answer his call light. R2 stated he had waited…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate sized incontinence briefs for 2 of 4 (R2 and R13) residents reviewed for accommodation of needs in the sample of 13.Findings Include: 1.R2's admission Record with a print date of 1/6/25 documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include morbid obesity, unsteadiness on feet, heart disease, and osteoarthritis.R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/31/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R2 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R2 is occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder.R2's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of I am occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. Date Initiated: 11/01/2025. This Focus area includes interventions of, Apply barrier cream after each incontinent episode Date Initiated: 11/01/2025.Check and Change Q (every)2-3H (hours) and PRN (as needed). Date Initiated: 11/01/2025.On 1/5/26 at 11:38 AM, R2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents skin was free from moisture associated skin damage (MASD) for 2 of 3 (R2 and R3) residents reviewed for skin care in the sample of 14.Findings Include:Findings Include:1.R2's admission Record with a print date of 1/6/25 documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes morbid obesity, unsteadiness on feet, heart disease, and osteoarthritis.R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/31/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R2 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R2 is occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder.R2's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of I am occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. Date Initiated: 11/01/2025. This Focus area includes interventions of, Apply barrier cream after each incontinent episode Date Initiated: 11/01/2025.Check and Change Q (every)2-3H (hours) and PRN (as needed). Date Initiated:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided using current standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents (R2 and R13) reviewed for incontinence care in the sample of 14.Findings Include:1. R2's admission Record with a print date of 1/6/25 documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes morbid obesity, unsteadiness on feet, heart disease, and osteoarthritis.R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/31/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R2 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R2 is occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder.R2's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of I am occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. Date Initiated: 11/01/2025. This Focus area includes interventions of, Apply barrier cream after each incontinent episode Date Initiated: 11/01/2025.Check and Change Q (every)2-3H (hours) and PRN (as needed). Date Initiated: 11/01/2025.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of falls during a mechanical lift transfer for 1 of 3 (R6) residents reviewed for falls in the sample of 19.This past non-compliance occurred between 10/1/25 and 10/8/2025.Findings Include:R6's admission Record with a print date of 11/29/25 documents R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include peripheral vascular disease, acquired absence of left leg, hypertension, anemia, history of falls, unsteadiness on feet, abnormal posture.R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 09, indicating a moderate cognitive deficit. This same MDS documents R6 is dependent on staff for transfers.R6's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of I have an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care/mobility performance (functional abilities) deficit that may fluctuate with activity throughout the day right BKA (below knee amputation) with activity throughout the day…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to answer call lights in a timely manner for 3 of 12 residents (R6, R7, R8) reviewed for call light response times in a sample of 12. Findings include: 1. On 3/31/2025 at 11:47am, R7 activated her call light and at 12:15pm, V2 (Director of Nursing) responded. On 3/31/2025 at 12:25pm, R7 who was alert to person, place and time stated staff do not answer the call lights very quickly and she frequently has to wait 25-30 minutes for her call light to be answered. R7 said it doesn't matter what time of day it is or who is working, call lights are not answered very quickly. R7 said the resident council brings up the call light issue, but nothing has changed. 2. On 3/31/2025 at 10:55am, R6 who was alert to person, place and time stated she usually has to wait about 30 minutes for her call light to be answered. R6 said resident's have complained in resident council about the call light response times. 3. On 3/31/2025 at 12:00pm, R8 who was alert to person, place and time stated staff do not answer her call light very…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received timely assistance with toileting and showers for 2 (R1 and R4) of 4 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) in the sample of 10. Findings Include: 1. R4's admission Record with a print date of 10/23/24 documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include sepsis, polyosteoarthritis, malignant neoplasm, dysthymic disorder, hypertension, heart disease, atrial fibrillation, syncope and collapse. R4's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/16/24 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13 which indicates R4 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R4 requires substantial/maximal assistance with toilet transfer and moving from a sitting to standing position. R4's current Care Plan documents a Focus Area of I have an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care/mobility performance (functional abilities) deficit that may fluctuate with activity throughout the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly label/cover food items and prevent cross contamination. This failure has the potential to affect all 67 residents residing in the facility. The Findings Include: On 5/28/24 at 10:00 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen, the following items were found not to be labeled and/or covered in the refrigerators: drink pitchers not labeled, desert bowls that were covered but not labeled, shredded cheese not labeled, and salad not labeled. The cake was found to be uncovered on a tray and not labeled. During the initial kitchen tour, the bulk sugar container had a cup with no handle in the container. Other food debris that was brown in color was seen in a bulk sugar container, and the lid to sugar container was sticky and had dust and food substance stuck to it. On 5/28/24 at 11:00 AM, V12 (Cook) stated that she will correct these concerns as they have recently lost their dietary manager and they are working through that. The food storage policy dated 2020 documents .1. General storage guidelines to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer a resident for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for 3 (R40, R15 and R43) of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR's in the sample of 33. Findings Include: 1. R40's admission Record documents an admission date of 11/02/2021 and documents diagnoses including: Bipolar disorder, current episode mixed, unspecified, with diagnosis date of 5/25/22, Major Depressive Disorder, single episode unspecified, with diagnosis date 11/02/2021, and Unspecified Dementia with a diagnosis date of 11/02/2021. R40's current Level 1 PASARR dated 11/03/2021 documents long term care placement was appropriate. 2. R43's admission Record documents an admission date of 02/19/2019 and documents diagnoses including: Major Depressive Disorder recurrent, unspecified with diagnosis date of 04/21/2019, and Psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition with diagnosis date of 06/12/2019. R43's current Level I PASARR dated 05/10/2023 documents a diagnosis of Major Depression but did not include Psychotic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HAVEN HEALTHCARE — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL