Loft Rehab & Nursing Of Canton

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 80 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 63.7 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.92 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.02 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent a burn injury caused by a homemade hot pack application for one (R1) of 14 residents reviewed for incidents and accidents. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a blister thermal burn to R1's left outer knee requiring medical treatment. Findings include: R1's medical record documents in part that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease); Mild Protein-Calorie Malnutrition; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; Hereditary and Idiopathic Neuropathy, and on 2/16/26 additional diagnoses of Multiple Fracture of Ribs, Bilateral Sequela and Acute Respiratory Failure. R1's medical record documents R1 has mild cognitive issues with a BIMS/Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11 of 15. R1's medical record documents R1 had bilateral knee discomfort and complained of pain to his left knee area following a fall on 12/08/25. A Nursing Progress Note by V3 (Wound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's anticoagulant therapy was maintained related to a diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation, obtain a valid physician order prior to discontinuing the medication, and document clinical justification to discontinue a residents anticoagulant therapy for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care in a sample of three. These failures resulted in (R1) who was at high risk for thromboembolic (blood clots that form in one location and travel to another location, potentially blocking blood flow) events, experienced complications from a suspected complication of Acute Cerebrovascular Accident due to Cerebrovascular Disease and passed away after Xarelto was discontinued for 75 days without physician authorization or documented clinical justification.Findings include: R1's admission Record, dated [DATE], documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following, but not limited to, diagnoses: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to use extensive assistance of two staff members during a mechanical lift sit-to-stand transfer for one of four residents (R3) reviewed for falls in a sample of eight. This failure resulted in R3 falling during a mechanical lift sit to stand transfer, sustaining a severely painful dislocated left shoulder. Findings include: The facility's Safe Resident Handling/Transfers policy, dated 12/15/22, documents Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents are handled and transferred safely to prevent or minimize risks for injury and provide and promote a safe, secure, and comfortable, experience for the resident while keeping the employees safe in accordance with current standards and guidelines. Policy explanation: All residents require safe handling when transferred to prevent or minimize the risk for injury to themselves and the employees that assist them. While manual lifting techniques may be utilized dependent upon the resident's condition and mobility, the use of a mechanical lifts are a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify a resident's representative of a significant change of medication regimen for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for notification of change in a sample of three. Findings include:The facility's Notification of Changes Policy dated 2/10/25, documents Policy: The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician, and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification. Compliance Guidelines: The facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and/or notify the resident's family member of legal representative when there is a change requires such notification. Circumstances requires notification of change include: 3. Circumstances that require a need to alter treatment. This may include b. Discontinuation of current treatment due to i. Adverse consequences. ii. Acute Condition. Iii.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's representative was involved with the interdisciplinary team quarterly to review and revise a resident's care plan for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for care plans in a sample of three. Findings include: R1's Care Plan Sign in Sheet, dated 5/13/25, only documents V4's (Social Service Director) signature as attending R1's care plan meeting held on 5/13/25. R1's IDT (Interdisciplinary) Care Plan Care Conference, dated 5/13/25, documents V4 (Social Service Director), R1, V6 (R1's Spouse), and V7 (R1's Family Member) attended the care conference. This same Care Conference documents (R1) had her care plan today, (V6 R1's Spouse) and her son (identified as V7 R1's Family Member) attended. Due to no other department managers being available for the care plan the family would like it rescheduled for about a month with all department managers. On 8/4/25 at 9:28 AM V5 (R1's Power of Attorney) stated (R1) admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-05 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure coordination of care and communication between the facility and hospice provider for one of one resident reviewed for hospice services in a sample of three. Findings include:The facility's Agreement with Hospice Care, dated and signed [DATE], documents Coordination of Services: Hospice Provider and Facility have agreed to participate in a system of communication as described in Hospice Provider's policies and procedures to: 1. Ensure the Hospice Provider's IDG (Interdisciplinary Group) maintains responsibility for directing, coordinating, and supervising the care and services provided. 1. Ensure that the care and services are provided in accordance with Hospice Provider Plan of Care. 1. Ensure that the care and services provided are based on assessment of the Hospice Patient and family needs. 1. Provide for and ensure the ongoing sharing of information between all disciplines providing care and services in all settings, whether the care and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to implement Infection Prevention and Control Practices after residents were subjected to direct contact from a staff member who tested positive for COVID-19 (Coronavirus 2019) and after residents exhibited symptoms of COVID-19. These failures have the potential to affect all 67 residents residing within the facility. Findings include: The facility's Daily Census Report dated 1-21-25 documents 67 residents currently reside within the facility. The facility's COVID-19 (Coronavirus 2019) Prevention, Response, and Reporting policy dated 10-1-24 documents, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that appropriate interventions are implemented to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and promptly respond to any suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infections. COVID-19 information will be reported through the proper channels as per federal, state, and/or local health authority guidance. Staff will alert to signs of COVID-19 and notify the resident's physician/practitioner if evident fever/chills, cough, shortness of breath/difficulty…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to provide physician ordered treatments for three of three Resident's (R1, R2 and R3) reviewed for wound care in a sample of three. Findings include: Facility Wound Treatment Management Policy, revised 8/19/24, documents: to promote wound healing of various types of wounds, it is the policy of this facility to provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice and physician orders; and wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders including the cleansing method, type or dressing and frequency of dressing change. Facility Physician/Practitioner Orders, revised 12/13/23, documents: the attending physician/practitioner may include, but is not limited to wound care. The Facility Administrator Job Description, dated 6/2021, documents the position purpose as leading, guiding and directing the operations of the healthcare facility in accordance with local, state and federal regulations standards and established facility policies and procedures to provide appropriate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure food is prepared under sanitary conditions by not using Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) properly to prevent hair from contacting food. This failure has the potential to affect all residents with a current census of 65 residents. Findings include: The Hair Restraint; Jewelry; Nail Polish; False Eyelashes policy, dated 11/10/21, documents Food and nutrition services employees shall wear hair restraints and beard guards. Hairnets will be worn at all times in the kitchen. [NAME] guards or masks will be worn as indicated. Dietary staff must wear hair restraints to prevent their hair from contacting exposed food. If a hat is worn, a hairnet must be worn under the hat if any hair is exposed from under the hat. On 8/21/24 at 11:15 AM, two maintenance men (vendor) were observed to be in the kitchen working on an ice machine without hair or beard restraints donned. On 8/21/24 at 11:20 AM, V13 (Cook) was observed to have multiple pieces of hair exposed from under the hair restraint while preparing lunch trays. On 8/21/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has 2 deficient practice statements. A. Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) appropriately, failed to disinfect patient use items and failed to conduct hand hygiene per policy for one of three residents (R41) reviewed for infection control practices in a sample of forty residents. B. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to pass medications in a manner to prevent contamination. This failure has the potential to affect the 19 residents who reside on the 400 hall (R1,R5,R6,R12,R16,R19,R23,R26,R27,R31,R32,R36,R29,R46,R50,R54,R56,R60 and R61) in a total sample of forty. Findings include: A. The Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, dated 1/1/24, documents Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multi-resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities. b. An order for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide a completed transfer document for one resident (R68) of 2 residents reviewed for discharge in a total sample of forty. Findings Include: The Facility's Transfer and Discharge policy dated 1/30/24 documents Orientation for transfer or discharge must be provided and documented to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility, in a form and manner that the resident can understand. Depending on the circumstances, this orientation may be provided by various members of the interdisciplinary team. The Facility's Transfer and Discharge policy dated 1/30/24 documents for Emergency Transfers/Discharges that the nurse will Complete and send with the resident (or provide as soon as practicable) a Transfer Form which documents: Resident status, including baseline and current mental, behavioral and functional status and recent vital signs; Current diagnosis, allergies and reason for transfer/discharge; Contact information of the practitioner…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform personal care for one resident (R20) of twenty residents reviewed for clean and well kempt appearance in a total sample of forty. Findings Include: The Facility's Activities of Daily Living Policy dated 12/5/23 documents Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care. The policy also documents A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal hygiene and oral hygiene. R20's Electronic Medical Record documents that R20 was admitted for Hospice Care due to adult failure to thrive and muscle wasting. R20's Point of Care Response History documents that on 8/17/24 R20 was totally dependent for bathing and grooming. On 8/20/24 at 9:00 AM R20 was lying in bed in a hospital gown with full beard stubble with a longer mustache that covered his entire lips. R20's fingernails were also long. R20 stated I've been asking (staff) to shave…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete diabetic monitoring and care for one of two residents (R41) reviewed for quality of care in a sample of 40 residents. Findings include: R41's Minimum Data Set (MDS) documents R41 was admitted on [DATE] with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Insulin Dependence. R41's Physician's Standing Orders, undated, documents Diabetes: Unless otherwise indicated: blood glucose monitoring before meals and at bedtime. If no sliding scale ordered, may use the following scale . R41's Hospitalization Discharge summary, dated [DATE], documents Insulin to be administered per sliding scale every four hours. R41's Progress Note document R41 returned to the facility post hospitalization on 8/16/24 at 3:45 PM. R41's Blood Glucose Monitoring log documents a blood glucose level was conducted on the facility's admission assessment on 8/16/24 at 5:30 PM and not again until 8/19/24 at 11:06 AM. R41's Progress Note dated 8/19/24 at 10:09 AM documents Resident had been yelling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$134,115 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $27,265 — penalty dated 2026-03-17
• $85,860 — penalty dated 2025-11-22
• $20,990 — penalty dated 2025-08-05
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-12-16 for 2 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE LOFT REHABILITATION AND NURSING — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $334K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL