Loft Rehab Of East Peoria, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 236 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2024-10-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two large trash dumpsters are secured from flying birds/insects and other small animals/rodents, in that the lids of the trash dumpsters were not closed. This failure has the potential to effect all 117 residents residing in the facility. FINDINGS INCLUDE: Facility Policy, entitled Standards and Guidelines: Garbage Dispose and Refuse, revised 3/4/2021, document: 4. will ensure the garbage storage areas are maintained in a sanitary condition to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests. The Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, Form 671-Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, dated 10/22/2024, document 117 residents reside in the facility. On 10/22/2024, at 9:00 a.m., during the initial kitchen tour, with V17/Dietary Manager, the two trash dumpsters, located outside, had lids which were open and both dumpsters had facility trash in them. On 10/22/2024, at 9:00 a.m., V17 confirmed the trash dumpster lids should have been closed.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise a Minimum Data Set (MDS) to include legally blind for vision for one (R106) of 24 residents reviewed for accurate MDS assessments in a sample of 36. Findings include: R106's medical record documents R106 has Legal Blindness, as defined in the USA (United States of America). R106's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documents under vision Adequate. R106's current care plan documents (R106) has impaired visual function related to blindness of both eyes and she is at risk for new/ worsening complication. On 10/22/24 at 9:36AM, R106 in her room lying across her bed, alert and oriented, and legally blind notes posted in her room. R106 stated she is blind, and cannot see shadows. On 10/24/24 at 12:07PM, R106 stated she has been blind all her life. On 10/24/24 at 12:01PM, V18 Care plan/MDS nurse verified R106 was legally blind.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise a care plan to include a specific dialysis access site, and which arm to use for blood pressure monitoring for two (R36 and R103) of 24 residents reviewed for care plan revision in a sample of 36. Findings include: Facility Care plan revisions, revised 1/25/23, documents The care plan will be reviewed and revised as necessary. The designated staff member will communicate care plan interventions to all staff involved in the resident's care. 1. R36's Physician orders for October 2024 documents (Dialysis) Shunt is in left arm. On 10/24/24 at 1:48 PM, R36 was in her room in bed on her left side, and stated her dialysis shunt was in her left arm. R36's current care plan has no documentation where R36's dialysis shunt is located, and which arm to use for blood pressure monitoring. 2. R103's Physician orders for October 2024 documents Dialysis site observation in right chest port. R103's current care plan has no documentation where R103's dialysis shunt is located, and which arm to use for blood pressure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for one (R18) of three residents reviewed for antibiotic orders in a sample of 36. Findings include: Facility's Physician/Practitioner Orders Policy Dated 12/13/22 documents: 2. For physician/practitioner orders received in writing or via fax, the nurse in a timely manner will: a. Call the attending physician to verify the order. b. Follow facility procedures for verbal or telephone orders including: noting the order, submitting to pharmacy, and transcribing to medication or treatment administration record. R18's 10/4/24 Physician Order documents: Doxycycline Hyclate (Vibramycin) (Antibiotic) 100 mg/milligrams tablet. Take one Tablet (100mg/milligrams total) by mouth two times daily for ten days x seven days due to UTI/Urinary Tract Infection. R18's Medication Administration Record/MAR dated 10/2024 does not document R18 was administered Doxycycline Antibiotic until 10/7/24. R18's Progress Note dated 10/4/24 documents: Resident returns to facility via facility van. New orders obtained…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to don proper personal protective equipment during gastronomy tube medication administration for one of one residents (R50) reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions in a sample of 36. Findings include: The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, dated 1/1/24, documents Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities. An order foe enhanced barrier precautions will be obtained for residents with any of the following: wounds (e.g., chronic wounds such as pressure ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, unhealed surgical wounds, and chronic venous stasis ulcers) and/or indwelling medical devices (e.g., central lines, urinary catheters, feeding tubes, tracheostomy/ventilator tubes) even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with a MDRO…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency for one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Facility Policy/Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated/revised 12/5/22 documents: 6.) Identification of Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation - The facility will consider factors indicating possible abuse, neglect, and/or exploitation of residents, including, but not limited to, the following possible indicators: c.) Physical injury of a resident, of unknown source. Physician Order Summary Report dated 4/2024 indicates R1 was [AGE] years old with diagnoses that include Long Term/Current Use of Anticoagulants, Personal History of Venous Thrombosis and Embolism, Unspecified Rotator Cuff Tear or Rupture of Left/Right Shoulder, Pain in Left Shoulder. Had been receiving Coumadin (anticoagulant) 2mg (milligrams) MAR (Medication Administration Record) indicates R1 received Coumadin (anticoagulant) 2mg (milligrams) in the evening for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to verify code status, failed to follow up on advanced directives, and failed to have the current paperwork on advanced directives for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for advanced directives in a sample of seven. Findings include: R1's medical record documents R1 is a full code as of [DATE]. R1's medical record, dated [DATE] by V18 APRN/Advanced Practice Registered Nurse, documents Recommend hospice and DNR/Do Not Resuscitate. R1's Medical Record documents R1 was admitted to hospice on [DATE] due to her diagnosis of End Stage Multiple Sclerosis and was not cognitively intact. R1's nurses note, dated [DATE] by V6 LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse, documents Packet filled out and forwarded to state guardian for (R1). Guardian called and noted sections left blank. Forwarded packet to hospice to be filled out by MD/Medical Doctor and forwarded back to the facility to be forwarded to (R1's) state guardian. Packet is consent to change from full code to DNR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain an order for catheter care upon admission for one (R3) of two residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters in a sample of seven. Findings include: R3's medical record documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of traumatic L4 compression fracture and urinary retention. R3's medical record documents R3 was at the facility for pain management, indwelling urinary catheter care, and weakness. R3's medical record has no documentation R3 received catheter care from 12/23/23 through 12/28/23. R3's Physician's orders, dated 12/28/23, documents R3's catheter care was to be conducted every day shift, to start on 12/29/23, and discontinued on 1/10/24. R3's Treatment Administration Record/TAR, dated December 2023, documents catheter care was started on 12/29/23. On 1/31/24 at 3:00 PM, V2 DON/Director of Nursing stated R3's physician order for catheter care was not obtained until 12/28/23 due to R3 being admitted on a weekend…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for one of 24 residents (R2) reviewed for call lights in the sample of 49. Findings include: The facility's Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response Policy (dated 08/01/19) documents the following: With each interaction in the resident's room or bathroom, staff will ensure the call light is within reach of resident and secured, as needed. R2's current care plan documents the following: (R2) has impaired vision in left eye related to ophthalmologic complications resulting from Diabetes Mellitus and Blindness right eye, and is at risk for new or worsening complications, including decrease in visual acuity. On 01/08/23 at 03:55 PM, R2 was sitting in her wheelchair near her bed with her eyes closed. R2 was dressed, groomed and had a full mechanical lift sling in place underneath her. R2 had a heel protector in place on her right lower extremity. R2's call light was out of her reach sitting inside of a plastic basin on a bedside table approximately five feet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy during incontinence care for one of four residents (R110) reviewed for personal care, in a sample of 49. Findings Include: The facility policy, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, dated (revised 12/5/22) directs staff, It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality. All staff members are involved in providing care to residents to promote and maintain resident dignity and respect resident rights. Maintain resident privacy. On 1/8/24 at 10:48 A.M., V5/Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was providing incontinence care for R110, who resides in a bed closest to the 200 hall, in the facility. R110 was lying on the top of the bed fully unclothed, while V5/CNA applied an incontinence brief. The privacy curtains for R110's bed were open. R110's roommate was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE LOFT REHABILITATION AND NURSING — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $729K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL