Hallmark Hc Of Carlinville
826 North High, Carlinville, IL 62626 · Government - City · 49 certified beds · (217) 854-9606 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (24) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $25,493 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-26)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.1% | 13.4% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.7% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.9% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.1% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 92.5% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.4% | 14.3% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.6% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.5% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.2% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 42.6% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.5% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 9.8% | 26.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.6% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.86 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.28 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.29 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 49 beds and averages 40.0 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
24 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-02-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide pain relief for 1 of 1 resident (R34) reviewed for pain in the sample of 43. This failure resulted in R34 not having R34's pain controlled. Findings include: R34's Face Sheet, print date of 2/25/25, documents R34 was admitted in 10/3/23 and has diagnoses of Hyperkalemia and Dementia. R34's Physician Order, dated 2/24/2025 at1:15 PM, documents, Lorazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (Lorazepam) Give 0.5 mg by mouth every 2 hours as needed for restlessness and agitation. R34's Physician Order, dated 2/24/2025 at 1:15 PM, documents, Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) Solution 20 MG/ML (milliliter) Give 0.25 milliliter by mouth every 2 hours as needed for pain and shortness of breath. R34's Hospice Notes, dated 2/24/2025 11:30 PM, documents, Resident cont (continued) with hospice care. Respirations labored with gurgling noted. Breath sounds wet, not moving secretions out. Skin cool & clammy to the touch. Afebrile. Occasional moan noted. SPO2 (oxygen saturation) 94% 4L (liters) O2 (oxygen) via mask. Residents eyes open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-02-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide pain medication for 1 of 1 resident (R34) reviewed for pain in the sample of 43. This failure resulted in R34 not having Morphine available for 9 hours, which resulting in undue pain. Findings include: R34's Face Sheet, print date of 2/25/25, documents R34 was admitted in 10/3/23 and has diagnoses of Hyperkalemia and Dementia. R34's Physician Order, dated 2/24/2025 at 1:15 PM, documents, Lorazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (Lorazepam) Give 0.5 mg by mouth every 2 hours as needed for restlessness and agitation. R34's Physician Order, dated 2/24/2025 at 1:15 PM, documents, Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) Solution 20 MG/ML (milliliter) Give 0.25 milliliter by mouth every 2 hours as needed for pain and shortness of breath. R34's Hospice Notes, dated 2/24/2025 11:30 PM, documents, Resident cont (continued) with hospice care. Respirations labored with gurgling noted. Breath sounds wet, not moving secretions out. Skin cool & clammy to the touch. Afebrile. Occasional moan noted. SPO2 (oxygen saturation) 94% 4L…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, monitor, and treat a wound for 1 of 4 (R9) residents, reviewed for repositioning, in a sample of 45. This failure resulted in R9 obtaining a wound to her coccyx, buttocks, and causing R9 to experience pain. Findings include: R9's admission Profile, print date of 1/22/4, documented R9 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis of Unspecified Fracture of Third Lumbar Vertebra, Subsequent Encounter for Fracture with Routine Healing, Displaced Fracture of greater Trochanter of Left Femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. R9's Care Plan, dated 1/9/24, documented, (R9) has the potential for impaired skin integrity related to incontinence, limited mobility. It continues Pressure redistribution mattress to bed. Provide diet as ordered. Labs as ordered. Evaluate Skin at least Weekly. Medications as ordered. R9's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented R9 is severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-07 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This has the potential to affect all 38 residents living in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 4/7/25 at 11:45 AM, the medication room was observed; mouse droppings were found around the baseboards. 2. On 4/7/25 at 11:50 AM, the laundry room was observed; mouse droppings were found around the baseboards in the dirty room. 3. R2's Face Sheet, print date of 4/7/25, documents R2 was admitted on [DATE] and has a diagnosis of Diabetes. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R2 is cognitively intact. On 4/7/25 at 8:46 AM, R2 stated, I did see mice last week. They caught two in the room and 1 in the bathroom. On 4/7/25 at 8:50 AM, under R2's window, mouse droppings are observed. 4. R3's Face sheet, print date of 4/7/25, documents R3 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses of a History of Heart Attack and Dependence on Renal Dialysis. R3's General Note, dated 4/2/2025, documents,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility to dispose of expired stock medications used by all residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 37 residents in the facility. The Findings Include: On [DATE] at 8:40 AM, the Unit Med Cart was reviewed with V4, Registered Nurse (RN), with the following medications expired: Fiber Laxative 625 MG (milligram) caplets that expired on 12/2024. A resident (R28) had a bottle of Atropine 1% ophthalmic solution that expired on 1/2025. On [DATE] at 8:45 AM, the Main Floor Med Cart was reviewed with the following medications expired: Mucus Relief 400 MG expired on 12/2024, Acidophilus 200 million cells/dose expired on 11/2024, Vitamin C 500 MG expired on 11/2024, and Cetirizine 10 MG that expired on 1/2025. On [DATE] at 8:55 AM, the Medication Room reviewed with the following expirations: Mucus Relief 400 MG bottles with 300 caplets - three bottles total, and all had expired on 12/2024. Benadryl 12.5 MG 8 OZ (ounce) bottle expired on 1/2025.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to store food at the needed temperature and discard expired food to prevent food borne illness. This failure has the potential to affect all 37 residents living in the facility. Findings include: On 2/23/25 at 8:21 AM, the stand up freeze had a temperature of 33 degrees. This freezer contained: large bag of carrots, bag of mix vegetables, and a bag of mixed onions and peppers that were thawed and mushy, a box of popsicles that were liquid, 16 precooked chicken patties that were thawed, 21 magic cup ice cream that were liquid, a large box of sausage patties that were completely thawed, a large box of hamburger patties that were partially thawed, 3 loaves of garlic bread that were thawed, and a box of multiple bags of whip cream that is liquid. The stand up refrigerator had a precooked ham that was dated 2/11, a carton of ready care thickened water dated 12/9, a carton of prune juice dated 11/4, and a carton of orange juice dated 2/14. On 2/23/25 at 8:25 AM, V15, Cook, stated the freezer stopped freezing at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with a written explanation as to why they are being transferred to the hospital for 3 of 3 residents (R28, R29, R34) reviewed for hospitalization in the sample of 43. Findings include: 1. R28's Face Sheet, print date of 2/25/25, documents that R28 was admitted on [DATE] and has a diagnosis of Dementia. R28's Progress Note, dated 2/22/25, documents, Resident has been transported to (local hospital) d/t (due to) fall per orders from On-call DR. R28's Notice of Transfer of Discharge, dated 2/22/25, fails to document the reason R28 was sent out to the hospital. 2. R29's Face Sheet, print date of 2/24/25, documents R29 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses of Severe Protein - Calorie malnutrition, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Dementia. R29's General Note, dated 2/22/2025 01:30, documents, Resident has been transported to ER (Emergency Room) d/t (a fall and c/o (complaint of) hip and lower back pain. R29's Notice of Transfer or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide the prescribed pressure ulcer treatment for 1 of 2 residents (R29) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 43. Findings include: R29's Face Sheet, print date of 2/24/25, documents R29 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses of Severe Protein - Calorie malnutrition, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Dementia. R29's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents R29 is severely cognitively impaired and has 1 Stage 3 pressure ulcer. R29's Treatment Administration Record, start date of 1/11/25 with a discontinue date of 2/25/25, documents, Silver sulfadiazine External Cream 1 % (Silver Sulfadiazine) Apply to Sacrum topically every night shift for wound care Cleanse area with WC (wound cleanser), pat dry, apply SSD (Silver Sulfadiazine), Hydrogel, collagen, calcium alginate, cover with ABD (abdominal pad) pad, secure with retention tape daily and PRN (as needed). This treatment was signed off on night shift on 2/23/25. R29's Treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to clean soiled surfaces for 2 of 8 residents (R21,R31) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 43. Findings include: 1. On 2/23/2025 at 10:53AM during incontinent care, V5, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), and V9, CNA, transferred R21 from wheelchair to bed. R21 had dark blue sweat pants on that had visible wet area on seat of pants. R21was incontinent of a large amount of loose watery stool. After incontinent care provided to R21, V5 and V9 did not sanitize R21's wheelchair. On 2/25/2025 at 2:48PM V13, CNA, stated if during incontinent care a resident is soiled through clothing onto chair, the chair should be cleansed. 2. On 2/23/25 at 12:48 PM, V5 and V19, CNA, transferred R31 from the bed to the wheelchair. The wheelchair seat had a soiled napkin and a large spot of dried food in the seat. Neither CNA cleaned off the seat before sitting R31 down. On 2/25/25 at 2:50 PM, V1, Administrator, stated, The wheelchair should have been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to employ a Registered Nurse (RN) in the role of full time Director of Nursing (DON), and to provide consecutive 8 hour Registered Nurse (RN) coverage in the facility. This has the potential to affect all 43 residents residing in the facility. Finding includes: There was no consecutive 8-hour RN coverage in 24 hours for the entire Month of October 2023, 11/1, 11/2, 11/4 to 11/30, the entire month of December 2023 and 1/1/2024 to 1/15/2024. On 01/16/24 at 1:38 PM, V9, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated \V1, Administrator, is also the DON (Director of Nursing). On 1/16/2024 at 11:40 AM, V10, CNA, stated V1 is also the facility DON. On 1/16/2024 at 1:40 PM, V1, Administrator, stated they do not have RN coverage. V1 stated they are actively recruiting for RNs. V1 stated V3, Regional Nurse, comes to the building once or twice a week. On 1/16/2024 at 12:20 PM, V3, Regional Nurse, stated they are actively recruiting for the Director of Nursing position. V3 stated they did have a DON for a short time and she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store medication, and label tuberculin and insulin vials. This has the potential to affect all 43 residents living in the facility. Findings include: On 01/16/2024 at 10:07 AM, the facility's Medication Storage Room was inspected. The refrigerator located in the medication room contained the following: 1. 1- 5 ml open and partially used multi dose vial of Apisol. No open date on the box or the vial. The Apisol package insert, dated 3/2016, documents Vials in use more than 30 days should be discarded due to possible oxidation and degradation which may affect potency. On 1/16/2024 at 10:15 AM, the medication cart was inspected. The cart contained the following: 2. R2's open and partially used multi dose vial of Lantus. No open date. 3. R1's open and partially used multi dose vial of Lantus. No open date. On 1/2/2024 at 9:55 AM, V7, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, The Apisol medication is a stock medication and used for all residents in the facility. Unless they have an allergy, all residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-01-23 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure the minimum required staff were present at the Monthly Quality Assurance Meetings. The failure has the potential to affect all 43 residents residing in the Facility. Findings include: On 1/16/2024 at 12:20 PM, V3, Regional Nurse, stated they are actively recruiting for the Director of Nursing position. V3 stated they did have a DON for a short time, and she was not willing to perform the required duties of the facility and quit. On 1/22/2024 at 8:14 AM, V1, Administrator, stated the Quality Assurance team meets monthly and should include every department head. V1 added, When I get a DON (Director of Nursing), she'll be there. The Facility's Quality Management Program Meeting Verification Forms, dated 10/18/2023, 11/15/2023, and 12/20/2023, were reviewed, and did not include a signature/title for the DON position. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, CMS 671, dated 1/16/24, documents the facility has 43 residents living in the facility.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy and dignity for 4 of 9 (R4, R18, R31, R33) residents, reviewed for resident rights, in a sample of 45. Findings include: 1. R31's face sheet, dated 1/18/24, documented R31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of dementia, type 2 diabetes, dysphagia, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, aphasia, osteoarthritis, hypertension, atherosclerosis, peripheral vascular disease, cardiomyopathy, and atherosclerosis. R31's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R31 is severely cognitively impaired. R31's Care Plan, dated 3/21/23, documented R31 requires extensive assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLS) and requires one-person physical assistance with eating. On 1/16/24 at 12:15 PM, R31's lunch was served to her in the dementia unit. At 12:57 PM, R31 had not taken any bites of her lunch, and V9, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA), fed R31 a few bites…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 11 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the building in good repair for 11 of 13 (R2, R6, R10, R14, R19, R19, R26, R29, R31, R33, R36, and R37) of 13 residents, reviewed for a homelike environment, in a sample of 46 reviewed for a homelike environment. Findings include: On 1/16/24 at 10:00 AM, during the facility tour of the dementia unit, the following maintenance concerns were observed: 1. R19 and R31's had multiple missing floor tiles in room. 2. R14 and R29's room had multiple missing floor tiles, the closet door was off the track, and the peach-colored painted walls were covered with white dry wall patches throughout the entire room. 3. R2 and R26's room hadroom had multiple missing floor tiles, the wall paint was chipped in multiple areas throughout the room, and the closet doors were off the track. 4. R37's room was missing the closet doors. 5. R33 and R36's room had multiple areas of wall damage with torn and missing wallpaper, the trim on the middle of the wall was missing revealing damaged drywall, the bathroom door and door jamb…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) as identified in Infection Control procedures, and failed to cleanse hands after removing gloves following resident incontinence care, to prevent/control spread of infection for 4 of 5 residents (R4, R9. R18 and R33) reviewed for Infection Control in a sample of 45. Findings include: 1. R4's, Physician Orders, dated 1/17/2024, documented R4 receives iron supplement tablet, 325 milligrams (mg) every morning and evening for Anemia. R4's Care Plan, last revision date of 11/23/22, documented R4 requires extensive care assistance due to a medical diagnosis of dementia, impaired mobility, weakness; behavioral disturbance of screams and yelling; also, documented R4 receives only one assistance from staff with transfers, which was last reviewed/revised on date of 2/16/2017. R4's Impaired skin integrity Focus area was last reviewed/revised on 11/23/22, for interventions to monitor R4's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide complete incontinent care for 2 of 4 residents (R4, R13) reviewed for incontinent care, in a sample of 45. Findings include: 1. R4's, Care Plan, dated 11/23/22, documented, (R4) requires extensive care assistance, due to a medical diagnosis of dementia, impaired mobility, weakness with incontinence of bowel and bladder. R4's, Physician Orders, dated 1/17/2024, documented R4 receives iron supplement tablet, 325 milligrams (mg) every morning and evening for Anemia. On 1/17/24 at 3:37 PM, R4 was transferred from her position in a wheelchair into her bed, with assistance of two nursing staff, V14 and V15, both Certified Nurse Aides, (CNA's), using a full mechanical lift. After laid flat on her back in bed and left pant leg up, R4's left lower ankle was exposed, revealing dark black dried streaks. V14 and V15 washed their hands, and placed on clean gloves. V14 was on R4's on left side of bed, and V15 on R4's right side of bed. They…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse working 8 hours a day, 7 days a week. This failure has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: On 2/21/2023 at 10:36 AM, V1, Administrator, stated (V2) Director of Nursing (DON) is the only Registered Nurse (RN) on the schedule. V2 works 8-10 hours a day Monday through Friday. They do not have RNs 8 hours a day that work Saturdays or Sundays. They are actively looking for a weekend RN, but they haven't had any luck. On 2/22/2023 at 2:25 PM, V2, DON, stated she works Monday through Friday, from 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM; she doesn't work Saturday or Sunday. The facility's daily staffing sheets from 2/7/2023 through 2/24/2022 document no RN worked on the weekends. On 2/24/2023 at 12:38 PM, V1 stated the facility doesn't have a policy for an RN 8 hours a day 7 days a week; they follow state guidelines on RN staffing.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was an air gap in the ice machine between the ice storage bin and floor sewage drain in the kitchen to prevent contamination of the ice. This has the potential to affect all 41 residents living in this facility. Findings include: On 2/22/23 at 8:00 AM, the drain hose from the ice machine was down inside the drain hole in the kitchen floor, along with the hose coming off the furnace. There was no air gap between the drain hole and the drain hose from the ice machine. On 2/22/23 at 10:45 AM, V3, Dietary Manager, stated the ice machine in the kitchen is the only ice machine in the facility, and is used for all the residents in the facility. On 2/22/23 at 10:48 AM, V6, Maintenance Supervisor, stated he is not really sure how much of an air gap there is supposed to be between the drain and the drainage hose from the ice machine, but he thinks it's about 3 or 4 inches. V6 stated he doesn't know how long the drainage hose has been down inside the drain, but they just replaced the ice machine a couple of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-24 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate tracking for antibiotic stewardship surveillance to monitor for patterns and trends in infections and antibiotic use for 4 of 4 residents (R12, R13, R20, R94) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in the sample of 46. Findings include: 1. The facility's document, Monthly Infection Control Log (Line List), dated July (No year), documented; had requested Infection Control Log for past year) documents R12 was diagnosed with a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and Colitis, but does not document the date of the onset of the infection, or identify the organism/pathogen causing the infection. The Infection Control Log documents R12 was ordered Levaquin on 7/28/22. R12's Urine Culture and Sensitivity Report, dated 7/27/22, documents the causative pathogen as Klebsiella oxytoca ESBL (Extended Spectrum betalactamase). R12's Physician Order Summary (POS), dated 2/24/23, documents the order, dated 7/29/22: Levaquin 500 milligrams (mg) daily for 5 days for infection. 2. The facility's document, Monthly Infection Control Log…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician for a neurological change in condition for one of 1 residents (R39) reviewed for notification in the sample of 46. Findings Include: R39's Electronic Medical Record documents diagnoses included: Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, BCR/ABL - Positive, not having achieved remission [The presence of the BCR-ABL1 abnormality confirms the clinical diagnosis of CML, a type of ALL, and rarely acute myeloid leukemia (AML)], chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, hypertension, and heart failure. R39's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents she was alert. R39's Nurses Note, dated 12/10/2022 at 3:22 PM, documents CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) picked up a blue pill from the resident's room laying on her bed. CNA brought the pill to the nurse, who went through resident's medications to identify which medication R39 had missed. R39 did not have any medication like the one CNA had brought. Writer asked R39 where she got the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and maintain adequate infection control practices to prevent cross contamination for 2 of 41 residents (R33, R34) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 46. Findings include: On 2/23/ 23 at 9:50 AM, V8, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), provided wound care treatment to R34. V8 placed a disposable pad under R R34's feet. V8 removed the wound dressing and observed blood and green drainage on the bandage. Blood dripped from wound onto the disposable pad. V8 placed scissors and wound cleanser bottle on the pad where blood was dripping from R R34's wound. V8 did not wash her hands or use hand sanitizer going from the dirty to clean wound dressing. V8 did not clean wound cleanser bottle after providing treatment care. V8 placed the contaminated wound cleanser on roommate's (R33's) nightstand. V8 did not clean roommate's table after placing the contaminated wound care cleanser bottle on roommate's table. V8 placed the contaminated wound care cleanser bottle in the bottom of the treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-02-26 · tag F0912 — widespreadProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide 80 square feet of floor space per resident in all resident bedrooms. This has the potential to affect all 37 residents living in the facility. Findings include: The facility has a total of 25 resident rooms. Each of these two-bed resident rooms have less than 80 square feet of floor space for each resident. The residents residing in these rooms are R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R24, R25, R27, R28, R29, R30, R31, R32, R33, 34, R35, R37, R38, and R40. Two rooms, rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], are currently being used as a dining room on the Dementia Unit. On 2/23/25 at 10:30 AM, all resident rooms measured, were less than 80 square foot per resident. On 2/23/25 at 11:00 AM, V1, Administrator, stated, All of our rooms are less than 80 square foot per resident. We have a room waiver for this. On 2/23/25 at 11:05 AM, V6, Maintenance Director, stated, I don't have a list…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-01-23 · tag F0912 — widespreadProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide 80 square feet of floor space per resident in multiple resident bedrooms. This has the potential to affect all 43 residents living in the facility. Findings include: The facility has a total of 25 resident rooms. Each of these two-bed resident rooms have less than 80 square feet of floor space for each resident, according to the facility document, Resident Room Square Footage, dated 2/21/20. Two rooms, rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], are currently being used as a dining room. On 1/16/24 at 10:30 AM, 1 of these two-bed resident's rooms, measures 72 square feet. The resident residing in this room is R24. On 1/16/24 at 10:30 AM, 2 of these two-bedroom resident's rooms, measure 77 square feet per resident's bed. The residents residing in these rooms are R19, R23, R31 and R32. On 1/16/24 at 10:30 AM, 6 of these two-bed resident's rooms, room [ROOM NUMBER], 5, 7, 21, 22, and 23 measure 78 square feet per resident's bed. The residents residing in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-02-24 · tag F0912 — widespreadProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide 80 square feet of floor space per resident in multiple resident bedrooms. This has the potential to affect all 41 residents living in the facility. Findings include: The facility has a total of 25 resident rooms. Each of these two-bed resident rooms have less than 80 square feet of floor space for each resident, according to the facility document, Resident Room Square Footage, dated 2/21/20. Two rooms, rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], are currently being used as a dining room. On 2/23/23 at 10:30 AM, 1 of these two-bed resident's rooms, measures 72 square feet. The resident residing in this room is R22. On 2/23/23 at 10:30 AM, 2 of these two-bedroom resident's rooms, measure 77 square feet per resident's bed. The residents residing in these rooms are R9, R25, and R30. On 2/23/23 at 10:30 AM, 6 of these two-bed resident's rooms, room [ROOM NUMBER], 5, 7, 21, 22, and 23 measure 78 square feet per resident's bed. The residents residing in these…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$25,493 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $25,493 — penalty dated 2025-02-26
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-19 for 13 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CREST HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLARK, ERIC | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 09/01/2019 |
| CAPITAL FINANCE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| ALICEA, TONYA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| FRIEDMAN, YISRAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| LICHTMAN, SHALOM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| SINGER, MEIR | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/01/2019 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $371K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145769. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.