No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Taylorville Skld Nur & Rehab

800 McAdam Dr, Taylorville, IL 62568 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 96 certified beds · (217) 824-2277 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (217) 824-2277 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 actual-harm citation$5,269 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
Worth asking about
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (18) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $5,269 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-12)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
201 E Pleasant St · (217) 787-2700 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
201 W Main Cross St
Grocery
Kroger0.9 mi
201 E Bidwell St · (217) 824-2911 · Call to confirm hours
Park
S Main St · (217) 824-4817 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.6%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.9%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.6%0.9%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms55.9%54.2%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.4%14.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.4%18.3%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.2%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.3%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.8%20.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.6%21.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.9%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine74.4%63.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.7%26.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.0%13.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.532.021.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.242.221.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
25.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 25.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.4%CMS range 31.7–55.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.8%CMS range 7.7–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge25.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge19.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge32.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.7–12.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.171.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
0.64
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.27
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.41
RN hoursweekends
43.1%
Total nursing turnover
12.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 81.3 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-16)
1
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-01)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-03-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure catheter care was provided as scheduled and failed to provide complete incontinent care for 3 of 4 residents (R9, R15, R49) reviewed for incontinent care/catheter care/urinary tract infections in the sample of 41. This failure resulted in R49 having recurrent urinary tract infections requiring Intravenous (IV) antibiotics and Contact Isolation; and, causing discomfort/pain to the resident. Findings include: 1. The Facility's Monthly Infection Control Log dated 12/2022 documents R49 had culture on 12/21/2022 which was positive for Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) of the urine. The Facility's Monthly Infection Control Log dated 1/1/2023 to 1/31/2023 documents R49 had an infection of the urine. The Facility's Monthly Infection Control Log dated 2/1/2023- 2/28/2023 documents (R49) Date of onset: 2/21/2023, organism: ESBL. R49's Face sheet dated 12/27/2023 documents, Diagnosis Information: Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-16 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure the Illinois Department of Public Health deficiencies findings were readily available for review, as well as post signage indicating where the report was located. This failure has the potential to affect all 81 residents residing in the Facility. Findings include: On 1/14/2025 at 10:15 AM, R7, R8, R12 and V23 stated they were unaware where to locate the survey results binder or what the results of the last survey were. R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R7 is cognitively intact. R8's MDS dated [DATE] documents R8 is mildly cognitively impaired. On 1/15/2025 at approximately 11:00 AM, V19, MDS coordinator stated R8's cognition has improved since her last MDS assessment. R12's MDS dated [DATE] documents R12 is cognitively intact. R23's MDS dated [DATE] documents R23 is cognitively intact. On 1/14/2025 at approximately 11:00 AM V22, Medical Records, was asked where the survey results binder was located. V22 opened a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to properly store medications and ensure timely disposal of a multi dose vial. This failure has the potential to affect all 81 residents residing in the Facility. Findings include: 1. On 1/13/2025 at 1:34 PM, the North Hall medication storage room was inspected with V20, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). There was a medication refrigerator that contained an open vial of Apilisol (A solution used to adminster TB skin tests) that had an open date of 11/20/2024. The sticker on the vial documented, Discard in use vials after 30 days. On 1/16/2024 at approximately 9:45 AM, V2, Director of Nursing stated V3, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) administers the TB skin tests. On 1/16/2025 at 10:19 AM, V3 verified the Apilisol vial observed in the medication storage room refrigerator was the only vial at the Facility on 1/13/2025 but they had since discarded it and ordered 2 more vials, one for each medication room. The document provided by V2, titled Aplisol- Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative, Diluted [Stabilized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure food was served at an appealing temperature for 7 of 24 residents (R7, R23, R32, R38, R66, R73, and R283) reviewed for dietary services in the sample of 36. Findings include: 1. On 1/14/2025 at 10:10 AM, R7 stated she eats her meals in her room and the food is cold 99% of the time. It won't even melt butter. Yesterday I only ate half of my spaghetti. Every bite was gross because it was cold. R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R7 is cognitively intact. 2. On 1/14/2024 at 10:15 AM, R23 stated, Most of the time it's cold (the meals). I usually get cold eggs but I eat them. I just cover them with mayo. R23's MDS dated [DATE] documents R23 is cognitively intact. The Facility's Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 10/25/2024 documents residents had dietary concerns of the food temperatures and Some residents' food is still cold- on the hall. 3. R66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of, in part,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide assistance/cueing for 1 of 3 residents (R11) reviewed for meal assistance in the sample of 36. Finding include: 1. On 1/13/2025 at 12:24PM R11 observed sitting at table in dining room asleep. R11's green beans are in bowl, with a roll in it. R11's spaghetti is in a bowl with a built up handled fork in spaghetti. On 1/13/2025 at 12:32 PM V21, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) asked R11 who was sleeping if R11 was getting enough to eat. R11 had not touched his food. V21 LPN did not cue R11 to eat. On 1/13/2025 at 12:37PM V21, LPN did place R11's drink in front of R11. At 12:40PM R11 observed drinking hot chocolate from cup and pouring it down his shirt. 12:42PM R11 got bowl of spaghetti and holds in left hand while scooping spaghetti with fork and spilling it on clothes. R11 then starts eating spaghetti out of bowl with his hands. At no time does staff provide cueing or assistance to R11. At 1:11 PM V21, LPN asks R11 if wants dinner roll and places in R11's hand. R11 eats 100% of dinner roll. R11 is never…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to prevent hair contamination for 2 of 24 residents (R7, R23) reviewed for Dietary Services, in the sample of 36. Findings include: 1. On 1/14/2025 at 10:10 AM, R7 stated, I found a hair in my mashed potatoes about a month ago. I love mashed potatoes and gravy and I'm trying to gain weight. I didn't finish eating them. I told someone, I don't know who, someone in the kitchen. R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R7 is cognitively intact. 2. On 1/14/2024 at 10:15 AM R23 stated, I've also had hairs in my food. I felt something in my mouth and there was a hair on my hamburger. It wasn't a short one like mine, it was long. They (Dietary staff) wear hairnets but it still happens occasionally. R23 stated she did not finish eating her hamburger because she lost her appetite. On 1/15/25 at 3:24 PM, V1, Administrator stated she was unaware of complaints of hair in food but she would look into it. The Facility's Safe Food Handling Policy dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to properly monitor personal food storage for four of four residents (R25, R63, R65, and R17) reviewed for environment in the sample 35. 1. R25's face sheet, dated 1/31/24, documented that R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, Osteomyelitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy, anxiety disorder, osteoarthritis, and chronic gout. R25's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 1/16/24, documented that R25 is severely cognitively impaired. On 1/29/24 at 9:15 AM, R25 was observed resting in bed. R25 had a small refrigerator sitting on his nightstand. The nightstand was within reach of R25. The refrigerator had a thermometer that read 78 degrees. The contents in the refrigerator included a gallon of chocolate milk that was half full and warm to touch, individually wrapped homemade caramels, a jar of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure that proper Nurse skills were provided according to standard of practice related to wound care. This has the potential to affect all 75 residents in the facility. Findings include: R56's admission Record, dated 3/1/23, documents that R56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R56's Diagnosis: Complete lesion of unspecified level of lumbar spinal cord, Osteomyelitis, Emphysema, Type 2 DM (Diabetes Mellitus), COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Malignant Neoplasm of Prostate, Dementia, Pathological Fracture in Neoplastic Disease - shaft of humerus left arm, Anxiety Disorder, Wedge fracture of lumbar vertebra, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Fracture of Sacrum, Disorder of Kidney and Ureter, HTN (Hypertension), Mild Cognitive Impairment, Obstructive and reflux uropathy, Anemia, Kidney Failure. R56's Care Plan, dated 2/14/23, documents (R56) has an Actual Pressure Ulcer; Site(s): coccyx. Requires assist with turning and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure food items are stored in a manner that prevents food borne illness and potential contamination. This has the potential to affect all 75 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 2/27/2023 at 9:37 AM, V16, Dietary Manager, stated, Excuse the mess. At this time, there was a large pan covered with aluminum foil. There was no label or date on the pan or foil. V16 stated, That's the cake I told her to label. Did she? Nope. I was using it for snacks. There was also a plastic bag of salad. It was open, not entirely sealed, only wrapped partially with saran wrap. The salad inside the bag was wilted and some pieces were brown. There was no date to indicate when the bag was opened. The bag had an expiration date of 2/25/2023. There was also a clear container, unlabeled and undated, with a yellow fluffy substance in it. V16 stated they were eggs from the previous day. There were 3 bags of peas in the refrigerator that were thawed and sweating. On the bag it was printed Keep frozen until ready to use. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-07 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify falls as a facility issue for their Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. This failure has the potential to affect all 75 residents living in the facility. Findings include: On 03/02/2023 at 10:28 AM, V2, Director of Nurses (DON), stated that Quality Assurance was working on Wounds. She continued to state that everyone on the committee is invited and if they are unable to attend in person they can call in or if they can't make it, they are given the report. Sometimes they have an extra meeting like for wounds this past month. 03/02/23 10:36 AM, V1, Administrator, stated they meet quarterly and go over all grievances and facility issues. The facility's QAPI Program Meeting Verification, dated 01/11/2023, does not document any issues with fall prevention or management. The facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Charter, dated 02/15/2023, documented, Quality Issues Identified: Increase in acquired pressure ulcers. It did not document any issues with falls. The facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct ongoing review of antibiotic use to ensure residents are prescribed the appropriate antibiotic. This has the potential to affect all 75 residents living in the facility. Findings include: 1. The facility's Monthly Infection Control Log, dated 02/01/2023 to 02/28/2023, documented that R38 did not meet infection criteria for being placed on an antibiotic. R38's Physician's order, dated 2/9/2023 documented, Obtain UA (urinalysis) one time only for UA for 1 day. R38's Progress note, dated 02/09/2023 at 8:36 PM, documented, (V28, R38's Doctor) was here to see resident and ordered labs, UA, and a chest xray to be done. R38's Progress note, dated 02/16/2023 at 5:31 PM, documented, (Office worker from V28's office), office called after reviewing UA and started resident on Cipro (antibiotic) 500 BID (2 times a day) for 7 days. R38's Progress note, dated 02/17/2023 at 9:52 AM, documented, dr. notified that antibiotic needed to be changed for his UTI (urinary tract in, he ordered Macrobid 100mg (milligrams) bid for 7 days,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 7 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to implement progressive interventions to prevent falls and elopement for 5 of 8 residents (R33, R34, R56, R40, R274) reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents in the sample of 41. Findings include: 1.R33's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R33 requires supervision of one staff member and one-person physical assistance for walking in her room. R33's Care Plan, initiated 4/5/22, documents R33 is at risk for falls and injury due to medications, arthritis, weakness, and hospice/end of life care. The Facility's Incidents by Type Log dated 2/27/2023 documents R33 had two falls on 10/21/2023. The Facility's untitled document dated 10/21/2022 at 3:15 (AM) documents R33 had an unwitnessed fall in her room. It documents, Heard a noise and went into resident room. Resident was on the floor laying on left side with feet towards the door. Reports hitting head off metal bed frame. It further documents R33 stated, I was trying to go to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and don/doff gloves appropriately for 5 of 5 residents (R9, R20, R36, R45, R56) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 41. Findings include: 1. On 2/28/23 at 8:55 AM, V4, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), passed medications to R36. V4 did not perform hand hygiene before or after the medication pass and hand hygiene was not done in between residents. 2. On 2/28/23 at 9:07 AM, V4, LPN, passed medications to R20. V4 did not perform hand hygiene before or after the medication pass and hand hygiene was not done in between residents. 3. On 2/28/23 at 10:49 AM, V8, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA), and V10, CNA, performed Peri Care for R9. V8 used a washcloth with a no-rinse foam cleanser on the cloth to cleanse R9's front peri area. R9 was turned over to her right side. V8 used the same gloves and a new cloth with foam cleanser to cleanse R9's buttocks and rear peri area. V8 used the same pair of gloves and obtained a clean incontinence brief and placed it under R9. V8 doffed her gloves,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to provide a baseline Care Plan that addressed all of a resident's care needs for 1 of 18 residents (R274) reviewed for baseline care plans in the sample of 41. Findings include: R274's admission Record, dated 3/1/23, documents that R274 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R274's Electronic Medical Record, documents that R274's Diagnoses include respiratory failure, dementia, cardiac murmur, Alzheimer's disease, and aortic valve stenosis. R274's Baseline Care Plan, dated 2/23/23, documents (R274) is at risk for falls and injuries related to Medications: Psychotropic Meds/ Diuretic Meds/ Cardiovascular Meds/ Pain Meds/ Other Medications. There were no documented interventions in R274's Care Plan related to falls. There was no care plan about R274's risk for elopement. R274's Fall Risk Assessment, dated 2/23/23, documents that R274 is a low fall risk with a score of 6.0. A score of 10 or higher indicates the resident is at risk. R274's Elopement Risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise Care Plans for individual needs and conditions; and failed to put appropriate interventions into place for 1 of 1 resident (R40) reviewed for care plan revision in a sample of 41. Findings include: R40's admission Record, with a print date of 03/02/23, documents R40 has diagnoses of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and osteoarthritis. R40's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R40 is severely cognitively impaired and requires extensive assistance, 2 plus person physical assist with bed mobility, transfer, toileting, and personal hygiene. R40's MDS documents R40 is also always incontinent of bowel and bladder. It also documents R40 is not steady on her feet and unable to stabilize without assistance from staff. R40's Care Plan, with initiation date of 03/07/22, documents R4 is at risk for falls related to use of psychotropic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure the menu was followed and notify residents prior to changes being made for 1 of 1 resident (R61) reviewed for dietary menu in the sample of 41. Findings include: On 2/28/2023 at 10:00 AM, R61 stated, Once in a while they change what is being served and we would like to know ahead of time. On 3/6/2023 at 11:55 AM, V16 Dietary Manager stated, I would expect for the menu to be followed but sometimes I have to tweak the menu. The Facility's Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 12/2/2022 documents, Concerns regarding when meals change. Would like to be notified in advance. Facility's Grievance Summaries dated 2/6/2023 documents, Residents want to be informed when the meal is changed before it is served. It continues to document Summary of Findings: Sometimes food won't be on the order when sent. It continues, Will start notifying residents sooner than serving time if the menu item isn't available. The Facility's Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 2/6/2023 documents, Old business: Concerns regarding not being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure food was served at palatable temperatures for two of two residents (R7 and R22) reviewed for palatable food temperatures in the sample of 41. Findings include: On 2/28/2023 at 10:00 AM, R22 stated she eats in her room and the food is cold when it comes, and it is late sometimes. R7 stated, They heat tomato soup in the microwave. The bowl gets hot, but the soup doesn't. They should put it in a pot on the stove. It's freezing ice cold. I hate being a pain, but I can't eat soup cold. The Facility's Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 12/2/2022 documents, Concerns with brownie temperature on 11/1/2022. It continues, Residents would prefer cottage cheese not be kept in the hot cart. The Facility's Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 1/4/2023 documents, Old Business: Residents stated most were resolved except the coldness of food in hall cart. The Facility's Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 2/6/2023 documents, Old business: Concerns regarding temperature of food on the hall carts. On 3/6/2023 at 12:05 PM, V16,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-03-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — widespread
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure residents received preferred substitutes as offered on the Facility's Always Available Menu. This has the potential to affect all 75 residents in the facility. Findings include: The Facility's Always Available Menu undated, documents, Hamburgers/Cheeseburgers, Tossed Salad/Chef Salad, Peanut Butter and Jelly, Grilled Cheese, Grilled Ham and Cheese, Ham Sandwich, Bologna Sandwich, Mashed Potatoes, Chicken Noodle Soup, Tomato Soup. The Facility's Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 12/2/2022 documents, Request for alternative dessert options-specifically for diabetics. The Facility's Grievance Summaries dated 2/6/2023 documents, Resident's state they are not always asked to choose their menu items. Residents aren't always being asked daily where they prefer that day's meal. It continues to document, Summary of Findings: If no unit aides or CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) can't get to asking all the resident what they want with their daily cards then residents aren't being asked. The Facility's Resident Council…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$5,269 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $1,882 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
  • $3,387 — penalty dated 2024-01-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREST HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.2+1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CREST I TBD HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/22/2025
CAPITAL FINANCE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2022
LICHTMAN, SHALOMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
LIGHT MAN LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/22/2025
CLARK, LACYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/11/2024
GILL, PAVINDERPALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 11%Other / private 22%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$277per resident / day
operating cost
$8,434per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$265per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146048. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next