No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Jacksonville Skld Nur & Rehab

1517 West Walnut Street, Jacksonville, IL 62650 · For profit - Individual · 88 certified beds · (217) 243-6451 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (217) 243-6451 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Sep 20253 actual-harm citations$23,027 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (27) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $23,027 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-25)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
15 Founders Ln · (217) 243-0300 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens1.5 mi
1802 W Morton Ave · (217) 479-0693 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1111 Carnation Dr · (217) 243-9175 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1385 W Walnut St · (217) 245-8919

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.9%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.8%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms69.0%54.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.4%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.0%14.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.5%18.3%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.9%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.5%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.1%20.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.2%21.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.4%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine66.7%63.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.1%26.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.0%13.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.592.021.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.772.221.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 119 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.40U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.8%CMS range 43.6–60.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 8.0–16.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.2%CMS range 5.7–14.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.471.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
0.80
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.01
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.22
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
37.0%
Total nursing turnover
16.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 80.9 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-09)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-22)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper inflation of the air mattress in 3 (R2, R4, and R5) of 3 residents in the sample of 8 reviewed for safety. This failure resulted in R2 being found on the floor from an unwitnessed fall and suffering a laceration on the right side of the head and several skin tears. Findings include: 1. R2's undated face sheet documented that R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's, dementia, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies, cachexia, and hypotension. R2's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R2 has severe cognitive impairment. R2 requires use of a wheelchair and is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R2's Care Plan, dated [DATE], documented that R2's problems include self-care deficit, impaired cognitive function due to dementia with Lewy bodies, is at a risk for falls and injuries related to balance problems, dementia, tremor, scoliosis, and medications. The interventions for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide safety and supervision for 1 of 3 (R3) residents reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in R3 falling, obtaining a laceration to the head, sutures and experiencing pain. Findings include: R3's Care Plan documents 6/28/23, documents that (R3) has a Self-Care Deficit As Evidenced by: Needs assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). It also documents Bed Mobility and Dressing require - One person physical assist required. R3's Care Plan continues (R3) is at risk for falls and injuries related to (r/t) cognition deficit and history of fall with fx. I have impaired mobility and lack safety awareness due to (d/t) my diagnosis (dx) of dementia. R3's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents that R3 is dependent on staff for Lying to sitting on side of bed: The ability to move from lying on the back to sitting on the side of the bed and with no back support. R3's Progress Note, dated 8/1/2024 at 5:15 AM, documents Nursing Note Late Entry:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-05-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide Oxygen to residents that required oxygen for 2 of 5 residents (R26, R56), reviewed for respiratory care in the sample of 40. This failure resulted in R26 becoming cyanotic with a low oxygen saturation of 51%. The Findings Include: 1. R26's Face Sheet, undated, documents R26 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Motor Neuron Disease, Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Osteoporosis, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease (ASHD), Sleep Apnea, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuritis, Arthropathy, Primary Lateral Sclerosis, Major Depressive disorder, Anxiety disorder, Hypertension, Pneumonia, Malignant neoplasm of bronchus and lung, Pulmonary embolism, Venous Thrombosis and Embolism, and Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen. R26's Care Plan, dated 8/26/20, documented that R26 has shortness of breath lying flat related and with exertion due to COPD. It continues to document that R26 has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure a resident's wheelchair was properly secured in the transport van for 1 (R2) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents in the sample of 4. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review that the deficiency practice occurred on 8/12/2025 and the deficient practice was corrected on 9/2/2025 prior to the start of the survey. Therefore the survey is Past Noncompliance.Findings Include:During the onsite survey, past noncompliance (PNC) was cited after the facility implemented actions to correct the noncompliance which included:1.Transportation vehicle was checked to ensure all safety mechanisms were properly functioning. Completed 8/12/2025.2.All transportation staff were trained on proper procedure for install of wheelchair and proper wheelchair to be used for transports, motor vehicle policy and first aid policy. Completed 2/20/2026.3.Transportation staff will log safety mechanisms in good working order and used properly for every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident abuse for 1 (R5) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse in a sample of 3. 1)R4's Undated Face Sheet documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a medical diagnosis of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, Major Depressive Disorder, Alzheimer's Disease, and Dementia.R4's Minimum Date Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4 is severely cognitively impaired. R4's Care Plan Date Initiated [DATE] documents R4 has behaviors related to makes accusatory statement, verbally aggressive toward others, misperceptions, jealous behaviors and R4 is at risk for alteration in psychosocial well-being related to Alzheimer's Disease, verbal behavioral symptoms toward others.2)R5's Undated Face Sheet documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has a medical diagnosis of Metabolic Encephalopathy, Anxiety Disorder, Dysphagia, Functional Quadriplegia, and Dementia.R5's MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's low air loss mattress was working properly for 1 (R2) of 3 residents reviewed for safe, function, sanitary, comfortable environment in the sample of 3. R2's Undated Face Sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a medical diagnosis of Thromboangitis Obliterans Buerger's Disease, Hyperlipidemia, Arthropathy, and Morbid Obesity. R2's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R2 is cognitively intact, is dependent on staff for rolling left and right, and is always incontinent of bladder and bowel.R2's Care Plan with a focus area revision date of 12/9/2023 documents R2 is at risk for pain and R2 needs assistance with activities of daily living including bed mobility with two-person physical assistance required and pressure redistribution device.R2's Care Plan with a focus area revision date of 2/21/2024 documents R2 has the potential for impaired skin integrity related to decreased mobility, morbid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to date an open vial of Tuberculin that is used for all staff and residents, failed to date opened insulin administration pens, failed to date an open bottle of eye drops, failed to date an open bottle of liquid acetaminophen, failed to date an open vial of multi-dose insulin, and failed to properly dispense medications to residents by leaving them at the resident's bedside. This failure has the potential to affect all 75 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 6/2/25 at 10:15 AM the facility's South unit medication room was checked with V21, Registered Nurse (RN). There was one medication refrigerator checked, and it contained an open tuberculin (TB) vial with no open date documented. The medication refrigerator contained 2 opened prefilled insulin pens with no open date or labeled with patient/resident name and 1 opened prefilled insulin pen with R9's name but no open date was documented on the insulin pen. R60's azelastine .05%…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to identify a pressure sore for 1 of 3 residents (R41) reviewed for pressure sores in the sample of 41. Findings include: On 6/4/2025 at 12:43 PM, V11, Wound Nurse, was in R41's room performing R41's pressure ulcer dressing change. R41 was on right side facing window as V11 removed dressing from R41's sacrum. R41's pressure ulcer dressing was tan-light brown with foul smelling drainage. V11 cleansed R41's pressure ulcer with wound cleanser. R41's pressure ulcer was oblong with slough and eschar inside the wound bed, no granulation and the peri wound are red. V11 stated R41's pressure ulcer was facility acquired and at time the pressure ulcer was found to R41's sacrum the pressure ulcer was unstageable due to slouch and eschar. V11 packed puffed gauze in wound bed and covered with bordered gauze. R41's Care Plan, dated 8/25/2024, revised 3/26/2024 documents R41 has a potential for impaired skin integrity related to cognitive deficits, decreased…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative services to prevent reduction in range of motion (ROM) for 1 of 4 residents (R58) reviewed for restorative therapy/Range of Motion (ROM) in the sample of 41. Findings include: R58's admission Record, dated 6/5/25, documents R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Polyneuropathy, Morbid Obesity, Buerger's Disease, Myiasis, Major Depressive Disorder, and Arthropathy. R58's Care Plan, dated 6/3/25, documents R58 Restorative: At risk for decline in their ability to complete bed mobility due to reduced physical function. Interventions: Assist R58 with completing bed mobility tasks with verbal cueing to participate to fullest potential. Provide R58 with verbal cues to use her side rails to assist in rolling in the bed. Provide R58 with hands on assist as needed. It continues R58 is a Long Term stay in Facility for Rehabilitation. R58's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R58 is cognitively intact and is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement an intervention to prevent falls for 1 of 4 residents (R41) reviewed for falls in the sample of 41 Findings include: 1. R41's Fall's Details report dated 5/2/2025 documents R41 was found on floor lying on stomach on mat beside bed. R41's report documents environmental conditions as bolsters were not clipped to bed. Report document R41 sustained a 3 centimeter (cm) long scratch to left cheek. R41's care plan dated 4/9/2021 documents R41 is at risk for falls r/t (related to) cognition deficit and history of fall with a fracture. Impaired mobility and lack of safety awareness due to diagnosis of dementia. R41's care plan documents the following interventions: 4/19/2025 bolster to bed for positioning. R41's Minimum Data Set, MDS, dated [DATE] documents R41 is severely cognitively impaired. On 6/5/2025 at 9:50AM, V1, Administrator stated the bolsters were loose and laying on the bed. The facility policy Accidents and Incidents dated revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide complete incontinent care and catheter care for 2 of 5 residents (R44, R58) reviewed for incontinence and catheter care in the sample of 41. Findings include: 1. R58's admission Record, dated 6/5/25, documents R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Diagnoses of Polyneuropathy, Morbid Obesity, Buerger's Disease, Myiasis, Major Depressive Disorder, and Arthropathy. R58's Care Plan, dated 4/2/25, documents R58's Self-Care Deficit as Evidenced by: Needs assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). Interventions: Toilet Use: Two-person physical assistance required. R58's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R58 is cognitively intact and is dependent on staff for toileting. R58 is always incontinent of both bowel and bladder. On 6/4/25 at 12:50 PM, V13, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), and V10, CNA, provided incontinent care on R58. All supplies were on the bedside table, with a large pile of wash cloths that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to administer resident medications at the correct time as ordered for 2 of 6 residents (R44, R39), reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 41. The Findings Include: 1. R44's admission Record, dated 6/5/25, documents R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Diagnosis of Cerebral Infarction, Hypertension (HTN), Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), Uropathy, Malignant Neoplasm of Bladder, Wedge fracture of lumbar vertebra, and Malnutrition. R44's Care Plan, dated 5/26/25, documents R44 has a diagnosis of hypertension. Interventions: Give antihypertensive medications as ordered, Obtain blood pressure readings per orders. It continues R44 is receiving medications with a black box warning. Medication type: antidepressant, antianxiety agent, nonopioid/opioid analgesic. Interventions: Administer medication as directed (correct time, dose, route, duration). It continues R44 is at risk for altered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during passing meal trays, and failed to don Personal Protective Equipment for 8 of 8 residents (R2, R7, R14, R41, R55, R56, R71, R73) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 41. Findings include: 1. On 06/02/2025 at11:40 am, V16, Activity Director served meal trays to R2, R56 and R71 without benefit of hand hygiene in between serving each resident. 2. On 06/02/2025 at 11:40 AM, V25, Activity Assistant, served meal trays to R7 and R73 without benefit of hand hygiene in between each resident. On 06/05/2025 at 11:15 AM V16, Activity Director, stated that when she is passing meal trays, she washes her hand in between each resident. On 06/05/2025 at 11:15 AM, V25, Activity Assistant, stated that when she is passing meal trays, she washes her hand in between each resident. On 06/05/2025 at 11:15 AM, V26, Environmental Services Supervisor, stated that when she is passing meal trays, she washes her hand in between each resident. 3. On 06/04/2025 at 12:35 PM V5, Registered Nurse (RN),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 14 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have interventions in place to prevent a fall, for 1 of 3 (R2) residents, reviewed for falls in a sample of 4. This past non-compliance occurred from 2/19/2025 to 3/10/2025. Findings include: On 3/6/2025 at 11:15 AM, R2 was sitting up in his recliner, sleepy. Pad alarm was in place and call light was within reach. Easily awoken, there was a scabbed area to his chin but R2 has a full beard. Indwelling urinary catheter, was hanging on the side rail of the bed, below his recliner. R2 was asked what happened when he fell, he stated that he really didn't remember. He then stated that his sister was visiting him, he thought when he fell. He was asked if he fell in the morning or in the evening and he stated that he thought it was in the evening, but he really didn't remember. On 3/10/2025 at 10:00 AM, V4, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated that she was just getting her day started, it was right after shift change, when she heard R2 fall. She found R2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to handle food in a manner that prevents potential contamination, failed to restrain hair and perform hand hygiene during food service. This failure potentially affects all 83 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 6/13/24 at 8:15 AM V3, Certified Nurse Aide, CNA, was feeding R1 breakfast. V3 was holding the toast with her bare hand and trying to get R1 to take a bite. V3 put the toast down multiple times and then attempted again with her bare hands. 2. On 6/13/24 at 11:25 AM, the kitchen was entered to observe the noon meal preparation. V13, Dietary Aide, was wearing a head band with a ponytail. V16, Corporate Dietary Supervisor, was wearing a hairnet that is positioned in the middle of her head. V16 also had a long side bang that was not restrained in the hairnet as it is lying on the side of her face. Neither V13's or V16's hair were restrained. During meal preparation V13 was observed to be preparing the residents trays with silverware, the drinks, and side dishes, V12, Cook, would then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store medication and failed to label a Tuberculin vial and Insulin vials. This has the potential to affect all 83 residents living in the facility. Findings include: On 05/19/2024 at 10:29AM the facility's 100-Hall Medication Storage Room was inspected. The refrigerator located in the 100-Hall medication room contained the following: 1. One open and partially used multi dose vial of Tuberculin. The vial was in the refrigerator, no open date on the vial. The Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative, (Mantoux), Tubersol package insert, dated April 2016, documents A vial of Tubersol which has been entered and in use for 30 days should be discarded. On 5/19/2024 at 10:30 AM the Medicare medication cart was inspected. The cart contained the following: 2. R8's open and partially used multi dose Lantus vial. No open date. 3. R71's open and partially used multi dose Gargling vial. No open date. 4. R37's open and partially used multi dose Humalog vial. No open date. 5. R182's open and partially used multi dose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely and complete incontinent care, including hand hygiene and glove changes for 5 of 5 (R23, R37, R48, R55, R180) reviewed for incontinence care in the sample of 40. The findings include: 1. R48's Face Sheet, undated, documented that R48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Brown-Sequard Syndrome, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Intervertebral disc disorders with Myelopathy, Arthropathy, Morbid Obesity, Bronchitis, Hypertension (HTN), Heart Failure, and Benign Prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with Urinary Tract symptoms. R48's Care Plan, dated 2/27/23, documented, (R48) has impaired urinary elimination related to (r/t) obstruction of urethra r/t BPH. (R48) was unable to use a urinal and will often place towels between my legs to urinate on. (R48) can make staff aware of my needs and when this has occurred. It continues, (R48) needs assist with his ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) r/t weakness, decreased…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to properly dispose of soiled linens, and cleanse hands between glove changes for 4 of 8 residents (R23, R48, R55 and R37) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 40. Findings include: 1. On 5/20/204 at 11:07AM, during incontinent care V20, Certified Nursing Assistant, (CNA), was providing incontinent care and R3 started, urinating, V20 removed gloves and donned new gloves. V20 did not sanitize hands prior to donning new gloves. R23's Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], documents, that R23 is dependent on staff for toileting. R23's MDS documents, that R23 is frequently incontinent of urine. R23's Care plan dated 04/25/2023, documents R23 is incontinent of Bowel/Bladder, related to Functional. R23's Care Plan documents, intervention dated 04/25/2023, to Clean peri-area with each incontinence episode. 2. R48's Face Sheet, undated, documents R48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Brown-Sequard Syndrome,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate lighting for 1 of 3 residents (R63) reviewed for reasonable accommodations for residents in the sample of 40. The findings include: R63's Face Sheet, undated, documented that R63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Polyneuropathy, Morbid obesity, Buerger's Disease, Myiasis, Major Depressive disorder, Arthropathy, restlessness and agitation. R63's Care Plan, dated 10/11/23, documented, R63 is focused on therapy and prefers to spend the majority of her free time resting in the comfort of her room involved in independent leisure pursuits. Interventions: Resident enjoys Reading scary books. It continues, 2/21/24 (R63) is at risk for falls related to (r/t) decreased mobility, History of Arthropathy, Polyneuropathy. Interventions: Provide adequate lighting, encourage use of call light, keep call light within reach, keep personal belongings within reach, provide verbal safety cues, provide/reinforce use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with moderate cognitive deficits who was identified as a potential risk for elopement did not exit the building unattended for 1 of 3 (R2) residents reviewed for elopement in the sample of 5. This past non-compliance occurred between 12/30/2023 and 1/2/2024. Findings include: R2's Care Plan, dated 10/12/22, documents that R2 has Potential Risk of Elopement due to Cognitive deficit and History of wandering. It also documents Identify any Patterns or Exacerbating Factors, Identify Individual factors which seem to calm, alleviate, or reduce behavior, Keep familiar items in residents living space, Monitor whereabouts regularly; Recognize any unsafe conditions or escalating patterns, Provide re-direction and Diversion as needed, Respond to any alarm activation promptly. R2's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents that R2 is moderately cognitively impaired. R2's Face Sheet, not dated, documents unspecified Dementia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store medication, and label insulin and tuberculin vials. This has the potential to affect all 79 residents living in the facility. Findings include: 1.On 4/24/2023 at 9:40 AM the South Hall Medication Cart was inspected, and the following was observed: R30's opened and used; multi dose Humalog pen not labeled with resident open date. The Humalog Manufacture insert documents Store at room temperature and use within 28 days. R42's multi dose Lantus Insulin vial not labeled with an opened date. R130's multi dose Lispro Insulin vial not labeled with an opened date. R230's multi dose Lispro Insulin vial not labeled with an opened date. On 4/24/2023 at 9:45 AM V4, Registered Nurse (RN), stated that the insulin vials were opened and in use. V4 stated that the insulin vials and pen should be dated when opened. V4 stated that the insulin vials are to be used within 28 days of being opened. V4 stated that when first opened the vial is dated and this is how it is known when the 28 days is up. 2.On 4/24/2023 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label cooked and opened food and discard expired food to prevent potential food borne illness. This has the potential to affect all 79 residents in this facility. Findings include: 1. On 4/24/23 at 9:30 AM, a large plastic container with Chicken Noodle Soup, covered with a hard plastic lid, was sitting on a middle shelf without a date or time written on it. On 4/24/23 at 9:35 AM, V6, Dietary Manager, stated I'm not sure when that was opened or made, there is no date on there. I will throw it out now. 2. On 4/24/23 at 9:40 AM, a case of Bananas was seen on a middle shelf, with no date on the box and all of the bananas were very brown in appearance. On 4/24/23 at 9:45 AM, V6, Dietary Manager, stated There was probably a date on the lid, and someone threw away the lid. These bananas are old, and it looks like I will be making a lot of banana bread today. 3. On 4/24/23 at 9:48 AM, three plastic containers of Benaprotein Powder were seen in the storage room. Each one was opened and used, and each one had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide timely and complete incontinent care for 5 of 6 residents (R5, R9, R17, R24, R59) reviewed for incontinent care in a sample of 45. Findings include: 1. R5's Care Plan, dated 3/1/2023, documents that Resident is incontinent of bowel related to on hospice care R/T (related to) end life DX (diagnosis). It continues Check & (and) change routinely, clean peri-area with each incontinence episode, Report to MD abnormal symptoms or conditions; skin break-down, excoriation, rash, bladder pain, dysuria, urinary pain, retro-peritoneal pain, excessive or inadequate urinary output, or abnormal urine characteristics; color, odor, clarity, hematuria, etc. R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents that R5 is always incontinent of bowel and bladder and requires extensive assist of 2 staff. On 4/25/2023 at 9:45 AM V14, Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA)/Staff Coordinator transported R5 into her room. V14 informed R5 that they would be laying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to perform hand-hygiene, administered subcutaneous medications via needle per standards of practice and handle linens in a manner which prevents contamination and spread of infection for 4 of 24 residents (R15, R17, R24, R59) residents reviewed for infection control in the sample of 45. Findings include: 1.On 4/25/2023 at 10:30 AM, V11 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administered Insulin Glargine solution 100u (units) /ML (milliliter), 20 units per syringe subcutaneously (SQ) into R15's left lower quadrant. After inserting the needle, V11 then removes syringe with needle and reinserts syringe with needle in another location lower left abdomen and administered remaining medication in the syringe. V11, LPN stated I felt a knot and had already injected some of insulin and wanted the resident to get the full dose of insulin. R15's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 4/1/2023 -4/30/2023 documents R15 is to be administered Insulin Glargine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to reduce pressure and prevent the worsening of pressure ulcers for one of 3 residents(R42) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 45. Findings include: On 4/24/2023 at 9:48AM R42 was sitting up in wheelchair in a room. R42 stated I had a few blisters on my heels then scabbed and when the scabs came off open areas. R42 had gripper socks on both feet and R42's feet were directly on wheelchair foot pedals. On 4/26/2023 at 12:15PM V10, Wound Nurse, entered R42's room to treat R42's heels. R42 did not have pressure relieving boots on. No pressure relieving boots were observed in R42's room. R42's Care Plan, dated 4/21/2023 documents that R42 has an actual pressure injury to R42's left heel. R42's Care Plan documents the following intervention: 4/21/2023, Pressure relieving boots. On 4/26/2023 at 2;30PM V26, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated that R42 is to have pressure relieving boots. V26 stated R42 had pressure relieving boots on last week, but they got soiled. The facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement fall interventions and safely transfer residents to prevent accidents for 2 of 5 residents (R12, R49) reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents in the sample of 45. Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 10:45AM, R49 was in his room lying in bed on his right side. V21 and V22 both Certified Nurse Aides, (CNAs), entered the room and brought in the full mechanical lift transfer into his room. V21 and V22 provided R49 incontinent care. At 11:10AM, V21 attached the support straps from the lift sling to the mechanical lift. V22 raised the mechanical lift, raising R49 off from the bed, and away from the bed, while V22 was placing shoes on R49's feet. No support was provided to R49 during his transfer from the mechanical lift and into his wheelchair. R49's, Care Plan, dated, [DATE], documented, a Self-Care Deficit As Evidenced by; requires assistance of two staff using a mechanical full lift for transfers. The facility's policy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered. There were 29 opportunities with 2 errors resulting in a 6.9% medication error rate. The errors involved 2 residents ( R73 and R132) in the sample of 45 residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: On 4/25/2023 at 10:00AM, V11, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) entered R73's room with 2 cups, with each cup containing Potassium chloride crystals ER 20 milliequivalent (meq). V11 poured water from a container into each cup of medicine, R73's medication did not dissolve. V11 administered R73's medication per gastrostomy tube (G tube). After administering medication, visible medication observed in cups. V11 then disposed of cups with remaining medication in the waste can in R73's bathroom. R73's Physician's Order (PO) dated 2/21/2023 documents that R73 is to be administered Potassium Chloride crystals Extended Release (ER) 20 Meq ; give 2 tablet via-g-tube one time a day for supplement. On 4/25/2023 at 10:15AM during medication administration V11 did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$23,027 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $14,203 — penalty dated 2024-09-25
  • $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-08-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREST HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.2+1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CREST CRJS HOLDCO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/14/2025
CREST CRJS TBD HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/14/2025
ECFJC TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/14/2025
IL M TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/14/2025
MRS WINDY CITY STATE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/14/2025
TSDAMA TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/14/2025
LICHTMAN, SHALOMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/14/2025
CAPITAL FINANCE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 09/01/2019
LIGHT MAN LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/14/2025
SONANI, BHAVINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/13/2023
ZAERR, SAWYERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/29/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.8M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 58%Medicare 15%Other / private 27%

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$320per resident / day
operating cost
$9,741per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$323per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145273. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next