Hilltop Skilled Nsg & Rehab
910 West Polk Street, Charleston, IL 61920 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 108 certified beds · (217) 345-7066 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0610) — most recent May 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 7 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $177,262 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-19)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.4% | 13.4% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 11.6% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 74.4% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.9% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.5% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.2% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.8% | 91.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.3% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.3% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.4% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 62.0% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.6% | 26.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.7% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.21 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.83 | 2.22 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
34.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 34.4%CMS range 26.2–44.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.1%CMS range 8.8–16.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 54.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 52.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.8%CMS range 4.6–16.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.23 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 62.8 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
60 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to properly implement fall interventions for one of three (R1) residents reviewed for falls on the sample list of four. This failure resulted in R1 falling and sustaining a left femoral neck fracture. This past noncompliance occurred from 5/1/25 through 5/9/25. Findings Include: The Full QA Report dated 5/1/25 documents R1 had a witnessed fall on 5/1/25 at 12:05 AM. R1 attempted to stand up from her wheelchair and fell to the ground. R1's chair alarm did not sound. R1 displays poor dynamic sitting/standing balance as well as impulsiveness related to her advanced Dementia diagnosis. V4 Certified Nurses Assistant (CNA) was walking by the hallway and observed R1 attempt to stand then lose her balance and fall to the ground. V4 notified the nurse on duty (V3 Registered Nurse RN). R1's emergency room documentation dated 5/6/25 documents R1 had a fall on 5/1/25 onto her left hip. R1 complained of pain and an X-ray was completed on 5/2/25. The x-ray showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by another resident and verbal/mental abuse by a staff member for four of seven residents (R1, R2, R3 and R5) reviewed for abuse in the sample list of seven residents. These failures resulted in R2 crying, feeling uncomfortable, and removing herself from shared areas with R1 after R2 was sexually abused by R1 and R5 experiencing feelings of isolation and fear after a staff member verbally/mentally abused R5. Findings include. 1.) R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R2 as cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R2 requires staff assistance for transfer into/out of her wheelchair and is able to propel wheelchair independently once seated. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 as moderately cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R1 as independent in bed mobility, transfers, walking less than ten feet and self propels wheelchair for longer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-07-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect residents (R2, R3) from inappropriate behaviors and sexual abuse by another resident (R1) after an abuse allegation. This failure affects three of seven residents (R2, R3 and R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample list of seven. This failure resulted R2 crying, feeling uncomfortable, and removing herself from shared areas with R1 after R1 was left unsupervised and R1 sexually abused R2. Findings include: The facility policy titled 'Abuse Policy' revised 1/9/24 documents the facility is committed to protecting residents from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property and mistreatment by anyone. The policy also states the facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. The facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a resident from leaving the building resulting in a fall outside on the sidewalk (R52) and failed to remove a mechanical lift sling from underneath a resident to prevent sliding in the wheelchair (R18) for two of eight residents (R52, R18) reviewed for accidents in the sample list of 34. This failure resulted in R52 exiting the building unaccompanied and falling resulting in abrasions to R52's face, hand and knee and a bruise to R52's face. Findings include: The facility's Accidents and Incidents policy with a revised date of 9/7/23 documents, Purpose: To provide staff with guidelines for investigating, reporting, and recording Accidents and incidents. Policy: All accidents/incidents involving a resident shall require an incident report. The interdisciplinary team (IDT) will complete an investigation to determine root cause and implement appropriate interventions. 1.) R52's Order Summary Report dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free of physical and mental abuse by another resident for one of six residents (R4) reviewed for abuse in a sample of six. This failure caused (R4) to experience psychosocial harm including fear, feeling unsafe, and feeling uncomfortable. Findings include: The facility's abuse prevention policy (not dated) states Resident have the right to be free of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property or mistreatment. This includes but is not limited to corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. The policy defines abuse as any physical or mental injury or sexual assault inflicted upon a resident other than by accidental means. Abuse is also the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with physical harm, pain, or mental anguish to a resident. This also includes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe mechanical lift transfers for two of four residents (R1 and R4) reviewed for accidents in the sample list of four residents. Failing to safely position R1 when using the sit-to-stand mechanical lift resulted in R1 sustaining a laceration requiring 13 sutures. Findings include: 1. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 as cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R1 as requiring total dependence of one person for transfers, extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, dressing, toileting, and extensive assistance of one person for personal hygiene. R1's Nurse Progress Note dated 8/11/23 at 2:57 PM documents, Called to (R1's) room around 8:00 AM. (R1) noted laying on the floor on his back. Staff report (R1's) knees buckled and he slid out of the mechanical lift. Staff had to lower (R1) to the floor but (R1) panicked and grabbed the sit-to-stand (lift) and R1's arm got hooked on the hook where the sling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-12-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to promote healing of pressure sores. The facility failed to transcribe and implement physician orders, failed to implement care plan interventions for pressure sore prevention, and failed to obtain physician orders for skin issues and ensure pressure wound treatments were being completed as ordered for three of three residents (R29, R56, R259) reviewed for pressure sores in a sample list of 27 residents. The facility failed to promote healing of R259's pressure sore by failing to implement pressure relieving interventions for R259's left foot pressure sore which subsequently progressed from a stage three to a stage four pressure sore. Findings include: 1.) R259's undated Face Sheet documents R259 was admitted to facility on 10/20/22 with medical diagnoses of Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, Idiopathic Peripheral Autonomic Neuropathy and Osteomyelitis of the Left Foot and Ankle. R259's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-12-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to supervise and implement fall interventions for a resident (R45) resulting in a fall with major injury. The facility also failed to maintain safe positioning of a resident's (R10) wheelchair during transfer. This failure affects two residents (R45, R10) of seven residents reviewed for accidents in a sample list of 27 residents. R45 sustained contusions (bruises) and a scalp laceration requiring 12 sutures from an unsupervised fall at the facility. Findings include: 1.) R45's undated Face Sheet documents medical diagnoses of Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Metabolic Encephalopathy and History of Falling. R45's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R45 is moderately cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R45 requires extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toileting. R45's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents R45 as a high fall risk. R45's Care Plan intervention dated 7/13/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide timely antibiotic treatment and provide perineal care after toileting for one resident (R3) out three residents reviewed for infection control in a sample list of four residents. Findings include:R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R3 is cognitively impaired and requires maximum assistance with toileting.R3's Nurse Progress Note dated 3/18/2026 at 6:06 PM documents R3 will return to the facility with a diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) and will be on an antibiotic.R3's Nurse Progress Note dated 3/18/2026 at 6:55 PM documents R3 returned from the hospital with UTI and orders for Cephalexin (antibiotic) 500 milligrams (mg), one capsule every eight hours for ten days. R3's Hospital discharge instructions dated 3/18/2026 documents a physician order for Cephalexin 500 mg oral capsule, give by mouth every 8 hours.R3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March 2026 documents Cephalexin was initiated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide palatable foods for residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 64 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:The facility daily midnight census dated 2/6/26 documents 64 residents reside in the facility.The facility Food Committee Meeting Minutes dated 12/8/25 documents the broccoli soup tasted scorched and was not mixed well and the tomato soup was watered down. The facility Food Committee Meeting Minutes dated 1/23/26 documents residents are not happy with evening meals and the night meal is not good. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 as cognitively intact.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R2 as cognitively intact.R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R3 as cognitively intact.On 2/6/26 at 12:25 PM, R1 stated the food looked good and tasted good. R1 stated It's a welcome surprise because the food is usually awful. R1 stated the food is served cold and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent cross contamination during meal services. This failure has the potential to affect all 64 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:The facility daily midnight census dated 2/6/26 documents 64 residents reside in the facility.The facility meal menu dated 2/6/26 documents the lunch meal will consist of fried chicken, mashed potatoes with gravy, creamed corn, drink and banana pudding. On 2/6/26 at 11:58 AM, V9 Manager in Training stated the fried chicken was not at a high enough internal temperature to serve. V9 was assisting in preparing other foods to be served. V9 then walked over to the service line, wiped her bare hands on her pants and picked up a thermometer by the shaft with her palm and fingers making full contact. V9 used this contaminated thermometer to test six pieces of chicken in a full pan of fried chicken. V9 then stated none of the chicken pieces tested were at the appropriate temperature so she used potholders that were laying on the contaminated counter to place that pan of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the safety of four (R1, R2, R4, R5) residents through the use of extension cords for medical devices out of four residents reviewed for physical environment in a sample list of five residents. Findings include:1.R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documents medical diagnoses as Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Chronic Respiratory Failure, Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation.R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 as cognitively intact.On 2/6/26 at 3:33 PM, R1's Nebulizer machine, Oxygen concentrator and BI-PAP machine were all plugged into an outlet strip extension cord which was plugged into the wall outlet. R1 stated she only has one outlet, so her bed and the extension cord is plugged into her outlet. 2.R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documents medical diagnoses as Asthma, Morbid Obesity, Atrial Fibrillation, Pericardial Effusion, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Heart Failure, Cardiomyopathy, Chronic Respiratory Failure and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect the right of a resident to be free from misappropriation of their medication. This failure had the potential to affect one of three residents (R2) reviewed for misappropriation on the sample list of five. This past noncompliance occurred from 4/16/25 through 4/24/25. Findings Include: The facility's Abuse Policy dated 9/15/23 documents the facility affirms the right of residents to be free from misappropriation of property. Misappropriation of resident property is defined as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings without the resident's consent. The facility's Controlled Substances policy dated 5/11/20 documents, controlled substances are reconciled upon receipt, administration, disposition, and at the end of each shift. Upon receipt, the nurse receiving the medication and the individual delivering the medication verify the name, dose, and quantity of each controlled substance being delivered. The Full QA Report dated 4/16/25 documents at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide foods that were palatable and at appropriate temperatures, and failed to provide a meal for a resident for five of nine residents (R8, R20, R30, R53, R163) reviewed for dining in a sample list of 43 residents. Findings include: The facility Resident Council Minutes for the Month of July, 2024 document resident concerns of the food being served cold. The facility Resident Council Minutes for the Month of August, 2024 document resident concerns of the ''food temperatures not being warm enough and food sometimes comes out burned. The facility Resident Council Minutes for the Month of September, 2024 document resident concerns that the facility needs to update diet tickets two times a year with likes and dislikes. The facility Resident Council Feedback form dated 9/20/2024 documents Department Response: Tickets will be updated with likes and dislikes twice yearly. 1.) R163's undated Face Sheet documents medical diagnoses as Heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain cleanliness of resident's mattresses. This failure affects one resident (R3) out of 24 reviewed for environmental cleanliness on the sample list of 43. Findings include: R3's Medical Diagnoses List dated 10/18/24 documents R3 experiences medical conditions including Dementia, Acquired Absence of Right Leg Above the Knee, and Acquired Absence of Left Leg Below the Knee. On 10/15/24 at 1:21 PM, there were smeared and mounded clumps of an unidentified white food substance resembling cake at the foot end of R3's mattress. The two clumps were one and one-half inches long by three-quarters of an inch wide. On 10/16/24 at 3:13 PM, the residue of the clumps of white food substance remained on the foot end of the mattress. The mounded clumps were not present, the surface residue was still on the mattress. On 10/16/24 at 3:18 PM, V10, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated, As far as I know the housekeeping only cleans the mattresses when they need to be sanitized, I don't know if they have a schedule to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately encode residents' minimum data set assessments concerning dental conditions. This failure affects two residents (R16 and R41) out of three reviewed for dental conditions on the sample list of 43. Findings include: 1. On 10/15/24 at 10:51 AM, R16's upper denture was falling down to her lower lip while speaking. R16 was pushing the denture upwards with her tongue and lower lip repeatedly during a brief conversation, impairing R16's speech pattern. R16 stated, I know they have adhesive but I don't like to use it. R16's Census Detail dated 10/18/24 documents R16 was admitted to the facility 9/10/24. R16's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Section L documents R16 has no broken or loosely fitting dentures. This same MDS section documents unable to examine. 2. On 10/16/24 at 09:57 AM, R41's upper denture was falling down to her lower lip while speaking. R41 was repeatedly pushing the upper denture back into place with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to include residents with denture problems. This failure affects two residents (R16 and R41) out of three reviewed for dental problems on the sample list of 43. Findings include: 1. On 10/15/24 at 10:51 AM, R16's upper denture was falling down to her lower lip while speaking. R16 was pushing the denture upwards with her tongue and lower lip repeatedly during a brief conversation, impairing R16's speech pattern. R16's Census Detail dated 10/18/24 documents R16 was admitted to the facility 9/10/24. R16's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Section L documents R16 has no broken or loosely fitting dentures. R16's Care Plan dated beginning 9/11/24 does not include any focus or problem area about R16's dentures including proper fit or cleaning care. 2. On 10/16/24 at 09:57 AM, R41's upper denture was falling down to her lower lip while speaking. R41 was repeatedly pushing the upper denture back…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a recapitulation of stay for one (R58) resident out of one resident reviewed for discharge in a sample list of 43 residents. Findings include: R58's undated Face Sheet documents R58 admitted to facility on 8/20/24 and discharged on 8/30/24. R58's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R58 as cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R58 as requiring maximum assistance with toileting, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene and transfers. R58's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated August 2024 documents medical diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Repeated Falls, Amnesia, Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Diabetes Mellitus Type II. R58's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) does not document a completed recapitulation of stay. R58's Discharge Plan and Instruction Report dated 8/30/24 documents a section titled 'Recapitulation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide safe and adequate assistance with showers to a dependant resident. This failure affected one of one resident (R39) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living on the sample list of 43. Findings Include: R39's Medical Diagnoses List dated October 2024 documents R39 is diagnosed with Lumbar Spondylopathies, Spinal Cord Injury of Lumbar Region, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, Depression, Left and Right foot Drop, and Neurogenic Bowel. R39's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R39 is cognitively intact. No documentation was entered for R39's showering needs. R39's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R39 requires partial to moderate assistance with showering and lower body dressing. R39 requires substantial or maximum assistance for putting on or taking off footwear. R39 requires supervision or touching assistance for tub or shower transfers. R39's Care Plan dated 2/29/24 documents R39 has a self-care deficit and requires one person staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident medical equipment was properly utilized for three (R8, R18, R42) residents out of three residents reviewed for safety in a sample list of 43 residents. Findings include: 1.) R8's undated Face Sheet documents medical diagnoses as Comminuted Fibula Fracture, Morbid Obesity, Diabetes Mellitus Type II, Chronic Respiratory Failure, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Left Non-Dominate side, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Pulmonary Hypertension, Legal Blindness and Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen. R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R8 as cognitively intact. R8's Hospital Discharge Record dated 10/11/24 documents R8 is to utilize 5 Liters of Oxygen per Nasal Cannula continuously. On 10/15/24 at 11:55 AM R8 was wearing her nasal cannula with her oxygen concentrator set at 5 Liters. R8's Oxygen concentrator was plugged into a pink extension cord laying on top of her bedside dresser. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician responses from pharmacist recommendations in a timely manner, and failed to develop their pharmacist policy to include timeframes for the steps in the monthly medication regimen reviews. This failure affects two residents (R16 and R44) out of five reviewed for unnecessary medications on the sample list of 43. Findings include: 1. R16's Census Detail dated 10/18/24 documents R16 was admitted to the facility 9/10/24. R16's Hospital Discharge Orders dated 9/10/24 document R16 had a physician ordered prescription for Semaglutide (Rybelsus) (Antidiabetic) 7 milligrams daily. R16's current Physician Order Sheet dated 10/17/24 documents R16's medication Rybelsus did not start until 9/24/24. R16's Consultant Pharmacist (V20) Recommendation dated 9/14/24 documents a notation R16 had a physician order for the medication Rybelsus on R16's hospital discharge record which was not present in the R16's electronic medical record. V20 documented to clarify this with the physician and update the electronic medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to honor one (R260) residents food preferences out of nine residents reviewed for meal service in a sample list of 43 residents. Findings include: R260's undated Face Sheet documents medical diagnoses as Cerebral Infarction, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Orthostatic Hypotension, Dementia, Vitamin D Deficiency, Anemia and Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3. This same Face Sheet documents R260 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R260's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R260 as moderately cognitively impaired. R260's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) does not include a food preferences interview. R260's Nutritional careplan was initiated 10/15/2024. R260's Careplan did not include a nutritional focus area, goal nor interventions prior to 10/15/24. R260's careplan intervention dated 10/8/24 documents R260 is of Hindu faith. On 10/15/24 at 12:45 PM R260 was served a Polish sausage, macaroni salad, spinach, chocolate chip cake with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to serve a resident meals consistent with a resident's allergies for one of nine residents (R6) reviewed for meal service in a sample list of 43 residents. Findings include: R6's undated Face Sheet documents medical diagnoses as Diabetes Mellitus Type II, Morbid Obesity, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Spinal Stenosis, Dizziness and Giddiness, Mild Intellectual Abilities, Fusion of Spine, Major Depressive Disorder, Borderline Personality Disorder and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). This same Face Sheet documents R6's allergies as Bupropion, Regadenoson, Tetracycline, Valproic Acid, Buspar, Penicillin and Onion. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R6 as cognitively intact. R6's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated October 2024 documents a physician diet order for Consistent Carbohydrate (CCHO) diet, regular texture and thin/regular consistency. R6's undated diet ticket documents R6 is allergic to onions. R6's Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document evaluations to determine cognitively impaired residents' capacity to consent to a known sexual relationship, failed to develop their policy on intimate resident behavior to include the criteria for initial evaluation and frequency with which a cognitively impaired resident's capacity to consent to an intimate relationship is to be evaluated, and to specify where and how the evaluations and determinations would be documented and maintained. This failure affects two (R1, R2) residents and has the potential to affect 22 additional cognitively impaired residents (R5 through R26) on the sample list of 26 reviewed for cognitive capacity. Findings include: The facility policy (undated) on Intimate Resident Behavior, Privacy, and Relationships, documents the facility may utilize, as appropriate, a mental health practitioner, psychiatrist, clinical social worker, or psychologist, or primary care physician to help in the evaluation and determination of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from sexual abuse by another resident. This failure affects two residents (R1, R2) reviewed for sexual abuse on the sample list of 26. Findings include: On 9/25/24 at 1:45 PM, V7 Licensed Practical Nurse, stated, I walked into R1's room and saw R1 with his privates (genitals) exposed and R2 was playing with R1's privates (genitals) with her hand. V7 then stated, I did not do anything about it because everyone tells me they are consensual. V7 concluded by stating, I think both R1 and R2 can form consent, they always sit at the table together and I hear them talking to each other asking if the other wants to come to their room. R2's Diagnoses List dated 9/25/24 documents R2's medical diagnoses includes Dementia. There were no facility assessments or referenced ability or inability for R2 to consent to sexual relationships documented in R2's medical record. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R2 scored a 2 out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop residents care plans to include an intimate relationship and the need for privacy. This failure affects two residents (R1, R2) out of 5 reviewed for care plans on the sample list of 26. Findings include: On 9/25/24 at 1:45 PM, V7, Licensed Practical Nurse, stated, I walked into R1's room and saw R1 with his privates (genitals) exposed and R2 was playing with R1's privates (genitals) with her hand. V7 then stated, I did not do anything about it because everyone tells me they are consensual. V7 concluded by stating, I think both R1 and R2 can form consent, they always sit at the table together and I hear them talking to each other asking if the other wants to come to their room. On 9/25/24 at 1:25 PM, V5, CNA, stated, I have seen R1 and R2 hold hands, and R1 hug R2 around the neck. V5 further stated, Another resident reported to me seeing R1 in R2's room rubbing on R2's private area (genitals) with her hand. The facility policy (undated) on Intimate Resident Behavior, Privacy, and Relationships documents the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse to the Abuse Coordinator timely for two of seven residents (R1, R5) reviewed for abuse in the sample list of seven. Findings include: R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R5 as cognitively intact. The facility was not able to provide documentation that R5's allegation of physical abuse between R1 and R5 was ever reported to the Abuse Coordinator and/or the State Agency. On 7/18/24 at 11:45 AM R5 stated A couple of months ago (R1) and I were roommates and we (R1, R5) got into a fist fight. (V8) Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) worked last night and I told her about that. (V8) said she didn't have any control over who my roommate is and I would just have to deal with it. On 7/18/24 at 2:30 PM R1 stated My old roommate (R5) and I didn't get along. We (R1, R5) beat each other up one time. I don't remember when. I never liked him (R5) anyway. I let (R5) have it. On 7/18/24 at 12:15 PM V8 Certified Nurse Aide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide denture care assistance for two (R1 and R3) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living from a total sample list of seven residents reviewed. Findings include: The undated facility policy documents that denture care is to be provided before breakfast and at bedtime. The resident is to be encouraged and assisted as needed. As denture care is provided, examination of the resident's mouth and gums for paleness, mouth sores, bleeding or areas of discoloration should be done. Encourage the resident to perform as much of the procedure as possible. 1.) R1's admission assessment dated [DATE] documents that R1 admitted to the facility with upper and lower dentures. R1's updated care plan does not document denture care. On 2/26/24 at 8:50AM, V4 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated that morning cares consist of washing (the residents) up, making sure they have their call lights, brushing their teeth, cleaning their dentures,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-01-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment by failing to prevent ongoing water leakage through the roof and mold-like growth in the shower rooms and on ceiling tiles. This failure has the potential to affect all 62 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: On [DATE] at 9:35 AM there was black mold-like substance on the East Hall shower room ceiling vent grate. There was also black and orange mold-like substance on the shower stalls wall and floor. The caulk was peeling off and the black mold like substance was growing underneath. On [DATE] at 9:40 AM one 2'x2' ceiling tile in front of room [ROOM NUMBER] and 106 was missing and the tile next to that spot appeared to have been saturate with water at one point, was bulging downward towards the floor and was discolored and brown. On [DATE] at 9:46 AM two 2'x2' ceiling tiles in front of room [ROOM NUMBER] and 108 were missing and four ceiling tiles around that spot had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide individualized fall interventions and provide safe access for communication/response to resident's requests for care. This failure affects one resident (R5) of five residents reviewed for fall interventions in the sample of five. Findings include: The facility's Fall Prevention Program/Protocol dated Revised 2/1/23, documents based on previous evaluations and current data, staff will identify interventions related to resident's specific risks to prevent resident from falling; new admissions will be reviewed for fall history and interventions put in place prior to admission to the facility; and rounds will be completed at least daily to ensure fall intervention remain in place. R5's Nursing Progress Notes dated 11/15/23 at 7:20 PM, documents R5 arrived to the facility by ambulance from the hospital, oriented to self only, resident up walking in halls, gait unsteady. This same progress note documents significant physical therapist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prepare and distribute food under sanitary conditions. This failure has the potential to affect all 61 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 10/31/23 at 10:57 AM, V23 [NAME] pureed a pork loin. V23 was wearing a ball cap. V23's hair stuck out of the edges of the ball cap. V23 had a full beard and and was not wearing a face covering over his beard. On 10/31/23 at 12:11 PM, V23 was serving lunch and was not wearing a face covering or a ball cap. On 11/01/23 at 1:28 PM, V22 Dietary Manager stated that V23 should have had his beard covered when cooking and serving food on 10/31/23. The facility's Long Term Care Application for Medicare and Medicaid form dated 11/1/23 signed by V1 Administration documents there are 61 residents residing in the facility.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-01 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop, implement and maintain an ongoing quality assurance performance improvement program over the past 12 months. This failure has the potential to affect all 61 residents of the facility. Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Application For Medicare and Medicaid dated 11/1/23 and signed by V1 Administrator documents 61 residents reside in the facility. The facility provided Quality Assurance Policy dated 7/20/22 documents that the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee oversees implementation of the QAPI plan, which is the written component of describing the specifics of the QAPI program, how the facility will conduct its QAPI functions and the activities of the QAPI committee. On 11/1/23 at 11:35AM, V1 stated that she was not aware of any performance improvement projects that had been developed by the quality committee over the past year. Nor was any performance project implemented with the front line staff and evaluated by the quality committee. No tracking and trending of performance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to hold quarterly quality improvement meetings over the past 12 months. This failure has the potential to affect all 61 residents of the facility. Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Application For Medicare and Medicaid dated 11/1/23 and signed by V1 Administrator documents 61 residents reside in the facility. The facility provided Quality Assurance Policy dated 7/20/22 documents that the administrator is responsible for insuring that the facility's quality program complies with federal, state and local regulatory requirements. On 11/1/23 at 11:54AM, V1 Administrator stated that no quality information could be provided prior to August of 2023, including meeting minutes. On 11/1/23 at 12:00PM, V10 Chief Operating Officer confirmed that no quality information could be located prior to August 2023.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
A. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to initiate a water management program. This failure has the potential to affect all 61 residents residing at the facility. B. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent potential cross contamination during incontinence care for one of two residents (R50) reviewed for incontinence care in the sample list of 34. Findings Include: a.) The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 11/1/23 documents 61 residents reside in facility. The facility's policy Legionella Water Management Program last revised July 2017 (not reviewed annually) states Our facility is committed to the prevention, detection, and control of water-borne contaminants, including Legionella. The water management team will consist of at least the following personnel: Infection preventionist, the Administrator, the Medical Director, the Director of Maintenance, the Director of Environmental Services. The purpose of the water management program is to identify areas in the water system where…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess the need for Psychotropic medications for five of five residents (R52, R9, R50, R18, R24) reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample list of 34. Findings include: The facility's undated Psychotropic Medication Protocol documents, Purpose: To provide guidance to facility staff in the implementation, monitoring and gradual dose reductions of psychotropic medications. Initiate GDR (Gradual Dose Reduction) monitoring flow sheet. Within 30 days of Initiation Discuss at weekly risk meeting, potential GDR evaluation (Complete assessment and update GDR monitoring flow sheet), AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) (if antipsychotic). Quarterly Initiate potential GDR (complete assessment and update GDR monitoring flow sheet). 1.) R52's Order Summary Report dated 10/31/23 documents diagnoses including Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Vascular Dementia, Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood, Suicidal Ideation, Auditory Hallucinations, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Major Depressive Disorder. R52's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to offer/administer Pneumococcal vaccines for four residents (R23, R29, R8, R49) of five residents reviewed for Vaccines in a sample list of 34. Findings include: The facility's Infection Control policy revised 5/21/22 states Each resident will be offered the influenza, pneumonia, and SARs-Co-V2 (COVID) vaccines as directed per CDC (Centers for Disease Control) guidelines, unless medically contraindicated. This shall be documented. 1. R23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R23 was not offered and did not receive the pneumococcal vaccine. There is no consent or refusal of the pneumococcal vaccine included on R23's electronic medical record. The immunization tracking included in R23's medical records does not document R23 received pneumococcal vaccine(s) according to current guidelines. 2. R29's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R29 was not offered and did not receive the pneumococcal vaccine. There is no consent or refusal of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to offer/administer Sars-Co-V2 (COVID) vaccines for four residents (R23, R29, R8, R49) of five residents reviewed for vaccines in a sample list of 34. Findings include: The facility's Infection Control policy revised 5/21/22 states Each resident will be offered the influenza, pneumonia, and COVID vaccines as directed per CDC (Center for Disease Control) guidelines, unless medically contraindicated. This shall be documented. COVID-19 Vaccines for Long-term Care Residents Updated Sept. 25, 2023 documents: CDC recommends everyone aged 5 years and older, including people who live and work in Long-term Care (LTC) settings, get 1 updated COVID-19 vaccine. People who are moderately or severely immunocompromised can get additional updated COVID-19 vaccines. Learn more about additional doses. People who live in LTC settings must give consent, or agree to getting a COVID-19 vaccine. 1. There is no consent or refusal of the current COVID booster included on R23's electronic medical record. The immunization tracking included in R23's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a call light was in reach for one resident (R213) of 16 residents reviewed for call lights in a sample list of 34. Findings Include: R213's Order Summary Report printed 11/1/23 at 3:10PM documents R213 was admitted to the facility 10/21/23 with diagnoses of Extensive Heart and Lung Disease and chronic Kidney Disease for Hospice care. On 10/30/23 at 3:20 PM R213 was resting in her bed. R213 stated I can't get to my call light. I'm thirsty, I want some ice, and I need straightened out in bed and I can't reach my call light. R213's call light was observed on the floor between the left side of the bed and the wall. No staff were observed in the room or the hall outside R213's room. On 10/31/23 at 3:15 PM R213 was resting in her bed. R213's call light was observed lying on the floor between the left side of the bed and the wall. V27, Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) entered the room. V27 stated The call light fell off. All residents should have a call light in reach at all times. On 10/31/23 at 11:00AM V2,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of a change in condition for one resident (R20) of 16 residents reviewed for condition change in a sample list of 34 residents. Findings include: R20's Care Plan revised 10/11/23 includes the following diagnoses: Type II diabetes Mellitus, Heart Disease, Anxiety, Dementia, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disorder, and Chronic Kidney Disease. R20's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R20 is severely cognitively impaired. R20's Face Sheet reviewed 10/30/23 documents V28 is R20's resident representative and Power of Attorney. On 10/30/23 at 12:37 PM V28 stated (R20) had diarrhea and black stool in July and the facility did not notify me. It turned out to be C-Diff (Clotridoides difficile) and they didn't let me know that either. R20's Progress note dated 7/4/23 at 11:15PM documents (R20) has large black foul smell stool. (R20) lethargic with temperature of 100.4, blood pressure 106/50,16 respirations, and 110 pulse.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of a transfer to the hospital for one resident (R20) of 16 residents reviewed for condition change in a sample list of 34 residents. Findings include: R20's Care Plan revised 10/11/23 includes the following diagnoses: Type II diabetes Mellitus, Heart Disease, Anxiety, Dementia, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disorder, and Chronic Kidney Disease. R20's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/27/23 documents R20 is severely cognitively impaired. R20's Face Sheet reviewed 10/30/23 documents V28 is R20's resident representative and Power of Attorney. On 10/30/23 at 12:37 PM V28 stated (R20) had diarrhea and black stool in July and the facility did not notify me. It turned out to be C-Diff (Clostridium difficile) and they didn't let me know that either. I didn't even know they sent (R20) to the Emergency Room. R20's Progress note dated 7/5/23 at 12:00AM documents (R20) has another large black foul loose stool. Temperature 100.5, blood pressure 107/48, pulse 109, respirations 15. (R20) lethargic. Sending…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level I screening was completed for two (R24 and R37)of two residents reviewed for PASARR level I screenings with serious mental illnesses and prescribed anti-psychotic medication from a total sample list of 34 residents reviewed. Findings Include: 1. R24's level I PASARR dated 7/1/19, documents that a level II PASARR is not required due to R24 not having a SMI (Severe Mental Illness) diagnosis upon admission to the facility on 7/2/19. R24's diagnosis sheet dated 11/20/20 documents a new diagnosis of Psychosis. R24's diagnosis sheet dated 1/5/23 documents a new diagnosis of Schizoaffecive disorder. R24's October 2023 physician order sheet documents Olanzapine 2.5 milligrams (mg) daily for schizoaffective disorder, Lorazepam 0.5mg for anxiety twice daily and Zoloft 25mg daily for depression. On 11/1/23 V19 Director of Operations said that another PASARR level one screening had not been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to update a care plan with resident's significant weight loss for two of 16 residents (R11, R20) reviewed for care plans in the sample list of 34. Findings include: The facility's Care Plan policy with a revision date of 1/11/23 documents, Purpose: To provide guidance to the facility in developing, implementing and communicating the individualized plan of care of residents. Policy: Our facility's Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident. 1.) R11's Order Summary Report dated 11/1/23 documents diagnoses including Hemiplegia following a CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident), Dysphagia Oral Phase, Unspecified Protein-Calorie Malnutrition and Vitamin B12 Deficiency Anemia. R11's Weight Summary dated 11/1/23 documents R11's weight on 7/12/23 as 142.5 pounds, 8/14/23 as 134.0 pounds, 9/11/23 as 125.0 pounds and 10/16/23 as 120.0 pounds. That is a significant weight loss of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assist with/provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care for two of three residents (R11, R50) reviewed for ADLs in the sample list of 34. Findings include: The facility's ADL Support policy with a revised date of 5/2/23 documents, Residents will be provided with care, treatment, and service as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care). 1.) R11's Order Summary Report dated 11/1/23 documents diagnoses including Hemiplegia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer treatments and relieve pressure while up in the wheelchair for one (R18) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers on the sample list of 34. Findings include: On 10/31/23 at 2:00 PM, R18 had a dime sized pressure ulcer to the left upper thigh. R18's wound assessment and plan dated 10/18/23 documents R18's wound to the left upper thigh as a pressure injury measuring 0.5 centimeters by 1.1 centimeters by 0.1 centimeters. On 10/30/23 from 12:12 PM to 12:29 PM, R18 was sitting in the dining room. R18 complained multiple times that he was sliding down in the wheelchair. R18 was noted to be sitting on a pressure relief cushion. A mechanical lift sling was positioned under R18's buttocks and on top of the pressure relief cushion. The sling was noted to be bunched in places. V6 Certified Nurse's Assistant assisted R18 with re-positioning in the wheelchair. On 11/01/23 at 2:51 PM, V6 stated she helped R18 with repositioning in the dining room on 10/30/23. V6 stated the mechanical lift sling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform complete incontinence care for one of two residents (R50) reviewed for incontinence care in the sample list of 34. Findings include: The facility's Incontinence Care Policy with a revised date of 5/16/22 documents, All incontinent residents will receive incontinence care in order to keep skin clean, dry and free of irritation and/or odor. Incontinence care will be provided as required. Wash all soiled skin areas and dry very well, especially between skin folds; changing gloves and performing hand hygiene as required to prevent cross-contamination. R50's Order Summary Report dated 10/30/23 documents diagnoses including Neurocognitive Disorder With Lewy Bodies and Unspecified Osteoarthritis. R50's MDS dated [DATE] documents R50 has severe cognitive impairment and requires extensive assistance of one staff for ADLs. On 10/31/23 at 12:05 PM, V6 and V7 Certified Nursing Assistants completed incontinence care for R50. V6 washed R50's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement nutritional interventions for a resident with significant weight loss for one of four residents (R11) reviewed for weight loss in the sample list of 34. Findings include: The facility's Weight Assessment and Intervention policy with a reviewed date of 11/2/21 documents, The multidisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight loss for our residents. Interventions for undesirable weight loss shall be based on careful consideration of the following: choices, preferences, nutrition and hydration needs, functional factors, environmental factors, chewing and swallowing abnormalities, medications, supplemental feeding and end of life decisions. R11's Order Summary Report dated 11/1/23 documents diagnoses including Dysphagia Oral Phase, Unspecified Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease, Hypokalemia and Vitamin B12 Deficiency Anemia. R11's Weight Summary dated 11/1/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide oxygen therapy as ordered and failed to change oxygen tubing weekly for one (R17) of one residents reviewed for oxygen therapy from a total sample list of 34 residents. Findings include: The facility Oxygen Administration policy dated 3/17/22 documents that it is the responsibility of the charge nurse to ensure that residents who have an order for oxygen are receiving it properly. Additionally, the tubing will be changed and dated weekly. R17's undated diagnosis sheet documents Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure, Chronic Pulmonary Edema and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. R17's October physician order sheet documents oxygen to be administered at 2-4 liters per nasal cannula to maintain oxygen above 90 percent. On 10/30/23 at 11:58AM, R17 was wearing oxygen while working a puzzle. R17's portable tank was empty and the nasal cannula tubing was dated 10/23/23, confirmed by V2 Director of Nursing. On 11/1/23 at 11:30 AM, R17's oxygen was running at three liters per nasal cannula with the tubing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess the risk for entrapment for the use of a bed rail for one of one resident (R18) reviewed for bed rails on the sample list of 34. Findings include: On 10/31/23 at 9:12 AM, R18 was lying in bed. The bed was positioned along the wall. A half bed rail was elevated on R18's right hand side of the bed. R18's medical record did not contain documentation that R18 was assessed for the risk of entrapment for the use of the bed rail. On 11/01/23 at 10:35 AM, V1 Administrator stated there is not an assessment for the use of R18's bed rail.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to securely store a schedule four medication and failed to dispose of undated insulin for three (R4, R47 and R213) of three residents reviewed for medication storage from a total sample list of 34 residents. Findings include: The facility Medication Storage policy dated 7/11/21 documents that all drugs will be stored in a safe, secure and orderly manner in accordance with state and federal regulations. Additionally, schedule 2-4 controlled medications will be stored in separately locked, permanently affixed compartments. Access to controlled medication is separate from access to non-controlled medication. The facility provided insulin drug manufacturer instructions document that multidose, Lantus and Humalog Insulin vials must be disposed 28 days after opened. The facility provided insulin drug manufacturer instructions document that a multidose, Levemir Insulin vial must be disposed 42 days after opened. On 10/30/23 at 3:51PM, V5 Registered Nurse (RN) confirmed that R4's open Lantus Insulin, nor open Humalog…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate and sufficient services to prevent urinary tract infection (UTI) for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter. The facility also failed to obtain an acceptable urine specimen from a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter from 9/26/23 to 10/11/23(2 weeks) resulting in a delay of treatment. These failures affects one resident (R4) of three residents reviewed for catheter care in a sample list of seven residents. Findings include: R4's Undated Face Sheet documents R4 admitted to facility on 8/25/23 with medical diagnoses of Infection and Inflammatory Reaction due to indwelling Urethral Catheter, Urinary Tract Infection, Dementia, Weakness, Spinal Stenosis and Urine Retention. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4 as moderately cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R4 requires extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. R4's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain infection control practices for one (R4) resident on contact isolation precautions for Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) in urine out of three residents reviewed for catheters in a sample list of seven residents. Findings include: R4's Undated Face Sheet documents R4 admitted to facility on 8/25/23 with medical diagnoses of Infection and Inflammatory Reaction due to indwelling Urethral Catheter, Urinary Tract Infection, Dementia, Weakness, Spinal Stenosis and Urine Retention. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4 as moderately cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R4 requires extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. R4's current Careplan documents R4 as a high risk for a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). This same careplan does not include an intervention to maintain contact isolation precautions. R4's Urine Culture and Sensitivity Results…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-29 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to employ a qualified director of food and nutrition services. This failure has the potential to affect all 60 residents residing in facility. Findings include: The Facility Midnight Daily Census Report dated 9/26/23 documents 60 residents reside in facility. On 9/28/23 and 9/29/23 there was no Dietary Manager observed onsite. On 9/26/23 at 10:15 AM V9 Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) stated I split my time between this facility and another facility. I am not here at this facility full time. I believe we are supposed to have a full time person in this role. I have (V6) who is a dietary manager in training but he is not certified and is not trained yet. We (facility) are working towards that. On 9/27/23 at 2:00 PM V18 Regional Dietary Manager stated (V9) is a Certified Dietary Manager who does oversee two facilities. (V9) is not at this facility Full-Time but that is our goal.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to properly label and store refrigerated food products, failed to properly store thawed meat to prevent meat juice from dripping on other foods, failed to ensure cleanliness of food serving area and sanitation of food preparation equipment and failed to ensure the dishwasher was operating as designed to sanitize dishes to prevent potential food borne illness to residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 60 residents residing in facility. Findings include: The facility Midnight Daily Census dated 9/26/23 documents 60 residents reside in facility. 1.) On 9/26/23 at 9:25 AM Observed V5 Dietary Aide test the dishwashing machine using a test strip. The test strip turned a light purple color indicating 25 parts per million (ppm). On 9/26/23 at 9:27 AM V5 Dietary Aide stated That dishwasher is gross. It really needs de-limed. Look at all the buildup (pointing to lime build-up) on the inside of the metal area where the water runs over and back to the dishes. That is nasty The (test) strip should be at least…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to serve foods that were palatable to four (R1, R4, R7, R9) residents out of four residents reviewed for Dietary Services in a sample list of eleven residents. Findings include: Resident Council Minutes dated 8/24/23 document a new concern of serving times. These same council minutes document the department response as Serving times are set for the building. We (staff) will get meals served on time as close as possible to times that are set. 1.) R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R10 as cognitively intact. On 9/27/23 at 12:35 PM R1 stated I just hope the food is hot today. Most of the time it is lukewarm at best. 2.) R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4 as cognitively intact. On 9/26/23 at 12:11 PM Observed V7 Dietary Aide place a quarter pan of barbecued pulled pork on serving line. Observed V7 Dietary Aide obtain temperature of pulled pork which was 119 degrees Fahrenheit. Observed V3 [NAME] plate this same…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to serve foods timely based on resident preference to four (R1, R4, R7, R9) residents out of four residents reviewed for Dietary Services in a sample list of eleven residents. Findings include: Resident Council Minutes dated 8/24/23 document a new concern of serving times. These same council minutes document the department response as Serving times are set for the building. We (staff) will get meals served on time as close as possible to times that are set. 1.) R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R10 as cognitively intact. On 9/27/23 at 12:35 PM R1 stated I am sure they (staff) are doing the best they can but it gets tiring to have to wait so long for our meals. My butt gets sore from sitting so long. 2.) R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4 as cognitively intact. On 9/26/23 at 12:40 PM Observed V14 Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) serve lunch tray with pulled pork sandwich to R4 in room. On 9/27/23 at 12:37 PM R4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-12-27 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist had completed mandatory training in Infection Control and Prevention per the Centers of Disease Control (CDC). This failure has the potential to affect all 53 residents residing in facility. Findings include: The Facility Census and Condition Report dated 12/6/22 documents 53 residents reside in facility. On 12/8/22 at 2:30 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated, I am the Infection Preventionist for the facility. I have completed all of the modules but unable to provide documentation of the completion of the course. On 12/9/22 at 1:00 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, I am an Infection Preventionist but do not have my certificate at facility and unable to provide the necessary documentation. V1 (Administrator) confirmed facility is unable to provide documentation of Infection Prevention completion for any other staff members.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report potential verbal abuse to the Administrator. This failure affects one of two residents (R31) reviewed for abuse on the sample list of 27. Findings include: R31's Progress Note dated December 2022 documents R31 is diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, and Factitious Disorder Imposed on Self. R31's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R31 is cognitively intact. R31's Care Plan dated 10/7/21 documents R31 has a potential for abuse related to her low self-esteem, anxiety, and attention seeking behavior. Staff are to monitor, document, and report any signs or symptoms of R31 posing a danger to herself or others. R31 also displays negative verbalizations towards staff and other residents and can be disruptive, insensitive, and disrespectful. R31's Progress Note dated 5/12/22 documents V11 (Activities Staff) (no longer a facility employee) witnessed R31 screaming and cursing at three other residents that were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-27 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure required personnel attended the required quarterly Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee meetings. This failure has the potential to affect all 53 residents in the facility. Findings include: The undated Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program documents the facility QAA Committee consists of the Director of Nurses, the Medical Director, the Administrator, at least two other members of the facility staff, and the Infection Control staff member. On 12/8/2022, V1 (Administrator) provided five QAA Meeting Verification Sheets (3/3/2022, 4/27/22, 5/25/22, 6/29/22, and 9/28/2022) for the previous year's QAA meetings. The March, April, May, and September 2022 QAA Meeting Verification Sheet sheets do not document the facility Director of Nursing was present at the meetings. On 12/8/22 at 3:30 PM, V1 (Administrator) confirmed all required members of the QAA committee including the Director of Nurses should be present at all quarterly QAA meetings. The facility Resident Census and Conditions of Residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow hand hygiene practices to prevent potential cross contamination during urinary catheter care for one (R45) resident out of one resident reviewed for catheter care in a sample list of 27 residents. Findings include: The undated facility policy titled 'Handwashing/Hand Hygiene' documents the following: This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors. Use an alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) containing at least 62% alcohol; or, alternatively, soap (Antimicrobial or non-Antimicrobial) and water for the following situations: before and after direct contact with residents, before and after handling an invasive device (urinary catheter) and before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during resident care. R45's undated Face Sheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-11-01 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to post daily staffing. This failure has the potential to affect all 61 residents residing in facility. Findings include: The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 11/1/23 documents 61 residents reside in facility. On 10/30/23 upon entry into the facility there was no posted staffing located anywhere in the lobby or office areas. On 10/31/23 at 9:00 AM, there is still no posted staffing located anywhere in the lobby or office areas of the facility. On 11/1/23 at 1:30 PM, V1 Administrator confirmed the daily staffing is not posted. V1 stated V1 doesn't know why it's not posted.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$177,262 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $53,768 — penalty dated 2024-07-19
- $86,697 — penalty dated 2023-10-28
- $36,797 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-27 for 24 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-09-26 for 7 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CREST HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CREST ILLINOIS HOLDCO LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/01/2019 |
| CREST I TBD HOLDCO LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 05/01/2021 |
| ECFJC TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2025 |
| IL M TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2025 |
| JCECF TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2025 |
| MRS WINDY CITY STATE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2025 |
| TSDAMA TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2025 |
| LICHTMAN, SHALOM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| CAPITAL FINANCE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2022 |
| LIGHT MAN LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/08/2021 |
| DOUGHTY, TYLER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/23/2024 |
| GAGE, ANDREW | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145862. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.