No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Shelbyville Healthcare & Senior Living

2116 South 3rd Dacey Drive, Shelbyville, IL 62565 · For profit - Corporation · 80 certified beds · (217) 774-2128 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent May 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
207 S Pine St Ste E · (217) 774-4400 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
110 N Cedar St · (217) 774-5513 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
408 E South 3rd St · (217) 299-0585 · Call to confirm hours
Park
201 N Chestnut St · (217) 774-3624 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
201 N Chestnut St · (217) 774-3624

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased31.0%13.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.8%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.9%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.3%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.4%54.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.6%14.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.2%18.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.5%91.8%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.9%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.6%20.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table38.7%21.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication8.0%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine30.6%63.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.2%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit25.0%13.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.722.021.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days5.342.221.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.15U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.201.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.19
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.76
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.87
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
60.0%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 39.0 residents a day — about 49% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.87 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.19 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.98 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.20 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-19)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-09)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2026-05-11 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from misappropriation of property by a staff member for 21 of 21 residents (R1-R21) reviewed for misappropriation in the sample list of 21. This failure resulted in $12,091.78 being misappropriated from R1 through R21's pooled resident trust fund. All 21 residents affected are vulnerable with Dementia and/or Mental Illness/Disability diagnoses. A reasonable person would likely suffer psychosocial harm, such as emotional distress and lack of trust as a result of misappropriation of funds. The Past Noncompliance occurred from 9/30/25 to 4/29/26. The Findings Include:The Immediate Jeopardy began on 9/30/25 when V4 (Business Office Manager) began writing checks for cash without resident approval. V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 5/6/26 at 2:40PM. The facility presented an abatement plan to remove the immediacy on 5/6/26. The survey team reviewed the abatement plan and was unable to accept the plan to remove the immediacy. The abatement plan was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Deficiencies at this level require more than one deficiency practice statement. A. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to transcribe and implement physician ordered wound treatments, failed to ensure wound supplies were provided and treatments were completed as ordered. The facility failed to accommodate a request for physician ordered wound treatments to be supplied or changed to an alternative treatment. The facility also failed to notify the provider of the facility changing the dressing orders, not transcribing/implementing Wound Physician Assistant (PA) orders, and not notifying the Wound PA of a resident request to change wound dressing orders for one (R1) resident out of five residents reviewed for wound care in a sample list of five residents. R1 experienced pain, embarrassment and worsening of his bilateral extremity wounds resulting in a 15-day hospitalization for the treatment of his BLE wounds and infection. B. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Narcotic medications are kept under a double lock system, failed to ensure medications are stored properly and failed to ensure medications remain in a locked environment. These failures have the potential to affect all 38 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility daily midnight census dated 2/17/26 documents 38 residents reside in the facility. 1.R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R6 as severely cognitively impaired. R6's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated February 2026 documents Physician orders to administer Divalproex Sodium Extended Release (ER) 500 milligrams (mg) daily at 8:00 PM, Rosuvastatin 40 mg daily at bedtime, Mirtazapine 15 mg daily at 7:00 PM, Glipizide 5 mg every morning at 7:00 AM, Apixaban (anticoagulant) twice daily at 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM, Metformin Hydrochloride (HCL) 500 mg twice daily at 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM, Benadryl Allergy Extra Strength 50 mg three times per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-19 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ a clinically qualified Director of Food and Nutrition Services. This failure has the potential to affect all 38 residents in the facility. Findings include:On 2/17/2026 at 9:35AM, V10 (Dietary Manager) was actively supervising dietary operations in the facility kitchen. V10 reported being the full-time manager of the facility food service (person in charge) and reported not being a clinically qualified Certified Dietary Manager (also known as Certified Food Protection Professional) or having equivalent training. V10 denied meeting the State of Illinois standards to be a food service manager or dietary manager (required in states that have their own established standards to be a food service manager or dietary manager (483.60(a) (2)ii)). V10 reported only completing a two-day course on food service sanitation (Certified Food Protection Manager) which did not include any instruction on clinical nutrition. V10 denied having any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to track and monitor employee illnesses. This failure had the potential to affect all 38 residents that reside in the facility.Findings include: On 02/18/2026 at 11:20 AM, V3 (Infection Preventionist) opened an Infection Control binder which contained resident infection logs and facility illness graphs. This binder did not contain logging of staff illness. V3 stated the facility does not document the signs and symptoms the employee is experiencing when sick or the type of illness if known. V3 stated she is only aware of nursing staff illnesses due to call offs. V3 showed a schedule where call offs were circled. V3 stated she is not aware of illnesses for other departments who work in the facility. V3 stated the facility does not formally track or monitor employee illnesses. At that time, V2 (Director of Nursing) grabbed a binder off a shelf, opened the binder, and flipped to a list from September of 2025. V2 stated this is a list of call offs of nursing staff for September. This list documented staff names and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-19 · tag F0887 — widespread
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer the staff COVID vaccinations and document the staff's COVID vaccination status. This failure has the potential to affect all 38 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 02/18/2026 at 11:20 AM, V3 (Infection Preventionist) stated the facility does not offer the staff COVID vaccinations or keep track of the staff's vaccination status. The facility's Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 2/17/26 signed by V12 (Regional Registered Nurse) documents there are 38 residents residing in the facility.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I for two of two residents (R6, R13) reviewed for PASRR's in a sample list of 29 residents. Findings Include: 1. R13's Medical Diagnoses List dated February 2026 documents R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a new diagnosis of Major Depression added in November 2025. R13's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II screening dated 12/13/24 documents a Level II screening is not indicated because there is no evidence of a serious behavioral health condition (Serious Mental Illness) however, if changes occur or new information refutes those findings the facility must submit a new Level I screening. On 3/23/25 at 9:25 AM, V12 (Regional Clinical Nurse) confirmed R13's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II was completed on 12/13/24 and a new mental illness diagnosis was added in November 2025 so a new PASARR Level I assessment should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and sanitize a needleless access device prior to flushing a peripheral inserted central catheter for one of one resident (R53) reviewed for infection control on the sample list of 45 residents. Findings include:On 2/19/26 at 9:58 AM, a beeping noise was heard from R53's room. At that time, V2 (Director of Nursing) grabbed and applied gloves when entering the room. V2 did not wash or sanitize her hands before putting on the gloves. After entering the room, while wearing the same gloves, V2 pushed a button on R53's intravenous pump to stop the beeping. V2 then flushed R53's peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC) with a prefilled saline flush and then flushed the catheter with a heparin flush. V2 did not sanitize the needleless access device prior to flushing the PICC line. When finished, V2 removed the gloves and walked out of the room without sanitizing her hands. On 2/19/26 at 10:05 AM, V2 stated hand hygiene should be performed prior to putting on gloves. V2 also stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely treatment of a resident's left lower back and left hip skin tears. The facility also failed to update the resident's skin care plan with the facility acquired skin tears. These failures affected one (R3) out of three residents reviewed for Accidents in a sample list of three residents. Findings include:R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R3 as severely cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R3 is dependent on staff for oral hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility and transfers. R3's Skin Integrity Care plan initiated 2/17/25 does not include updated interventions for R3's Left Lower Back and Left Hip skin tears obtained at facility on 7/3/25. R3's Physician Order Set (POS) dated July 2025 documents a physician order starting 7/7/25 to monitor R3's Left Hip skin tear for decrease in size/severity and signs and symptoms (s/s) of infection (increased warmth, drainage, smell, decreased…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident. This failure affects four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed for abuse in a sample list of four residents. Findings include: 1. The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program with revision date of 11/2016 documents the facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property and exploitation. This includes, but is not limited to, freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. This facility therefore prohibits mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse of its residents, and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to employ a Full Time Director of Nurses (DON). This failure has the potential to affect all 37 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The Facility Midnight Census Report dated 4/1/25 documents 37 residents reside in the facility. On 4/1/25-4/3/25 at various times there was no DON present in the facility. On 4/1/25 at 9:50 AM V1 (Administrator) stated the facility has not had anyone in the Director of Nursing role since early February 2025. V1 stated the DON plays an important role in the quality of care every resident receives. On 4/3/25 at 1:10 PM V14 (Wound Nurse/Licensed Practical Nurse/Infection Preventionist) stated she is struggling to keep up with all her duties because she is managing programs, working the floor, the wound nurse, the infection control nurse and 'all around' person to answer questions. V14 stated having a DON would reduce some of the problems in the facility due to the DON could assist with resident concerns and monitor programs so that nothing would get missed.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to initiate Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for four residents (R2, R3, R4, R5) out of five residents reviewed for EBP in a sample list of five residents. Findings include: 1. R2's Care plan intervention dated 10/17/23 does not document a focus area, goal nor interventions for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). On 4/1/25 at 10:00 AM R2 does not have a sign on her door indicating she is on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). R2 does not have any Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) outside of her room or any adjacent rooms. On 4/2/25 at 10:15 AM V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) and V14 (Wound Nurse/Infection Preventionist/IP) gathered wound supplies, walked into R2's room and stated they were ready to provide wound care for R2. V10 and V14 were not wearing gowns. On 4/2/25 at 11:05 AM V10 and V14 both stated they should have worn gowns. V14 stated R2 should have been on EBP and was not. V10 stated there was no EBP sign on R2's door so she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the dignity of one (R1) resident out of five residents reviewed for resident rights in a sample list of five residents. Findings include: The undated facility pamphlet titled Illinois Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program Residents' Rights for People in Long Term Care Facilities documents the facility must treat you with dignity and respect and must care for you in a manner that promotes your quality of life. R1's undated Face Sheet documents admitted to the facility on [DATE] and lists R1's medical diagnoses as Lymphedema, Chronic Venous Hypertension with ulcer of lower extremity, Diabetes Mellitus Type II, Parkinson's Disease, Cellulitis of Right and Left Lower Limbs, Morbid Obesity, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Acute Kidney Failure and Chronic Congestive Heart Failure. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 as cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R1 as requiring supervision with bathing and putting on and removing footwear.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity for two (R2, R3) residents out of three residents reviewed for abuse in a sample list of six residents. Findings include: The Illinois Long Term Care Ombudsman Program pamphlet titled Resident Rights for People in Long Term Care Facilities revised November 2018 documents the facility must treat the resident with dignity and respect and must care for the resident in a manner that promotes the residents' quality of life. R2 and R3's shared Final Report to the State Agency dated 2/18/25 documents R2 and R3 reported that at times V13 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) could be short with her responses but denied that she was mentally or verbally abusive to (R2, R3). R2 and R3's shared abuse investigation documents V13 (LPN) was in-serviced on 2/17/25 on Tone of voice when responding to residents' customer service, communication, and interacting with residents during medication pass. 1. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the safety of one (R1) resident from physical abuse by a staff member out of three residents reviewed for abuse in a sample list of six residents. Findings include: R1's undated Face Sheet documents medical diagnoses as Dementia, Psychotic Disorder with Hallucinations, Muscle Weakness, Unsteady on Feet, Reduced Mobility, Restless and Agitation and Violent Behavior. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 as severely cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R1 as independent in toileting, dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility, moving from a sitting to standing position and able to self-propel her wheelchair 150 feet. R1's AIM for Wellness dated 1/29/25 documents R1 had an alleged unintentional change in plane and an altercation with a staff member (V3) Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA. This same report documents (R1) was arguing with (R5) and (V3) CNA. (R1) was also upset with (V3) CNA when V3 CNA tried to redirect and take…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report a concern voiced in Resident Council Meeting of a staff members poor demeanor towards two (R2, R3) residents out of three residents reviewed for abuse in a sample list of six residents. Findings include: The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program revised May 2021 documents Employees are required to immediately report any occurrences of potential/alleged mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, and abuse of residents and misappropriate of resident property they observe, hear about, or suspect to a supervisor and the Administrator. Upon learning of the report, the Administrator or designee shall initiate an investigation. The facility Resident Council Minutes dated 1/22/25 document resident concerns of night nurse (V13) Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) demeanor towards residents. These same minutes document V12 (Previous Activity Director) as the staff liaison for this resident council meeting. On 2/14/25 at 2:10 PM R2 stated V13's 'poor demeanor' was discussed in January's Resident Council meeting. R2 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 10 days in a total of 39 days reviewed. This failure affects 25 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The Long-Term Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid form CMS 671 dated August 7, 2024 documents the census for the facility as 25 residents. Reviewing the facility's nurse assignment sheets for the months of July and August 2024. The facility had 10 days out of the 39 days reviewed which did not document RN time of 8 hours per day. The facility did not have a RN working at least 8 consecutive hours a day on 7/6/24, 7/7/24, 7/13/24, 7/14/24, 7/20/24, 7/21/24,7/27/24, 7/28/24, 8/3/24 and 8/4/24. V2 (Director of Nurses) confirmed on 8/8/24 at 12pm, Yes, this is correct we do not have the RN coverage for the weekends.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the resident's right to formulate advanced directives. This failure affects one resident (R179) out of 16 reviewed for advanced directives on the sample list of 28. Findings include: On [DATE] at 1:57 PM, R179's Electronic Medical Record did not include any information about R179's wishes or election of advanced directives (code status). This same record documents R179 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 2:00 PM, R179 stated, No, no, no, I would not like to be resuscitated. R179 continued, I don't think I am being selfish about it; I am just in pain all the time and I wouldn't want to be brought back for that. R179's Face Sheet dated [DATE] documents R179 is his own responsible party. On [DATE] at 2:10 PM, V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse) looked through R179's Electronic Medical Record, as well as R179's paper chart, and stated, I don't see anything signed as DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) so he would be treated as a full code (all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote resident's right to a safe, comfortable homelike environment. This failure affects one of two residents (R14) reviewed for the environment on the sample of 28. Findings include: R14's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents the following: R14's Brief Interview of Mental Status score as 14 out of a possible 15, which indicates no cognitive impairment. On 08/06/24 at 10:05 am, R14 was lying in bed. Between the head of R14's bed and R14's bedside dresser there was an unpainted, 10-inch hole. The hole had loose, crumbling white plaster-like substance. R14 stated I have gotten use to looking at that. It is not pretty. The hole in the wall has been there since I came to the facility, two years ago. It could use some attention. On 8/7/24 at 11:15 am, during a resident group meeting, R14 stated I told you yesterday about the hole in my wall. You saw it. It is terrible. I set on the side of my bed and eat. I can't help but see it. You…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure R14's Bilevel positive airway pressure (Bi-PAP) mask was replaced in a timely manner which resulted in facial skin breakdown. This failure affected one of one resident (R14) reviewed for the respiratory medical equipment on the sample list of 28. Findings include: R14's Current Physician Order Summary Sheet documents the following: BiPAP wear nightly. Observe resident every four hours while in use. Cleanse mask as needed after each use every shift related to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Unspecified. R14's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents the following: R14's Brief Interview of Mental Status score as 14 out of a possible 15, which indicates R14 has no cognitive impairment. R14's Care Plan dated 8/04/24 documents the following: Resident has a potential impairment related to fragile skin. The resident will maintain or develop clean and intact skin by the review date. Educate resident/family/caregivers of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement a resident's departure alert system safety bracelet intervention, for twelve days after a resident's elopement. This failure affects one of four residents (R129) reviewed for incident /accidents on the sample list of 28. Findings include: R129's admission Diagnoses Sheet dated 7/24/24 documents the following: Altered Mental Status, Unspecified, Other Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Unspecified Lack of Coordination. Unsteady On Feet, and Other Malaise. R129's Admission, Elopement Risk Assessments dated 7/24/24 documents R129 is at high risk of elopement, has a history of elopement from home, is ambulatory, cannot communicate and wanders into other resident rooms. R129's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R129 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status Score of 00 out of a possible 15, which indicates severe cognitive impairment. The same MDS documents R129 has had wandering behaviors 1-3 days during the seven day look…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement timely infection control precautions for a resident positive with bacteria in the urine, provide Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to ensure effective infection control when caring for residents, provide designated trash receptacles in resident room, ensure staff wore appropriate PPE during direct care, and implement a room change for a resident to prevent potential cross contamination. These repeated failures were ongoing 08/04/24-08/06/24. These failures affected two of two residents (R7 and R19) reviewed for infection control on the sample list of 28. Findings include: On 08/06/24 between 10:00 and 11:00 am, R7 and R19 had a sign posted on their bedroom door that stated enhanced barrier precautions. There was no signage for contact isolation precaution. There were no PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) supplies set up of outside R7 and R19's room. There were no designated receptacles in R7 and R19's room for discarding soiled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) at least eight consecutive hours a day. This failure has the potential to affect all 24 residents residing in facility. Findings include: The Daily Census dated 3/20/24 documents 24 residents reside in facility. The Facility Daily Staffing Sheets dated 3/2/24, 3/3/24, 3/9/24, 3/10/24, 3/16/24 and 3/17/24 does not document an RN on duty. The Facility Assessment updated 1/9/24 documents the facility will provide a Registered Nurse (RN) at least eight hours per day. On 3/20/24 at 3:45 PM V2 (Director of Nurses) stated the facility does not have adequate Registered Nurse (RN) coverage. V2 stated We (facility) do not have any RN coverage on the weekends. I am hiring but having trouble finding RNs to work the weekends. I work Monday-Friday only. I am on call on the weekends, but I am not in the building for eight hours. I might come in for a few minutes here and there but not for the whole eight hours.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-20 · tag F0825 — pattern
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide rehabilitation services to four (R1, R2, R3, R4) residents out of four residents reviewed for Rehabilitation Services in a sample list of four residents. Findings include: The Facility Daily Census dated 3/20/24 documents 24 residents reside in facility. The Facility Assessment updated 1/9/2024 documents the facility will provide therapy services including Physical Therapy (PT), Speech Therapy (ST) and Occupational Therapy (OT). On 3/20/24 at 3:45 PM V1 (Administrator) stated The previous therapy company gave our facility five days' notice that they were leaving. Their last day was 2/18/24. We (facility) have not had any therapy services since 2/18/24. We (facility) have been working diligently on regaining therapy services from another therapy company. We have not admitted any new residents but those that are involved have not received any therapy. 1.) R1's undated Face Sheet documents R1 admitted to facility on 2/22/2023. R1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse for eight consecutive hours seven days a week for 11 of 14 days reviewed. This failure has the potential to affect all 34 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: The facility's Nurse Staffing policy with a review date of 12/7/17 documents, It is the policy of (the facility) to provide sufficient licensed and unlicensed nursing staff on each shift of the day to attain or maintain the highest practical, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Nurse staffing shall be based upon resident evaluation by the Administrator and the Director of Nursing as specified by the Illinois Department of Public Health. On 7/16/23 at 7:55 AM, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated that V4 was the only nurse working in the building at that time. The facility's nursing daily working schedules from 7/1/23 through 7/14/23 document the facility did not have the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours on 7/2/23, 7/3/23, 7/4/23, 7/5/23, 7/6/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-07-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent cross contamination during meal service in a sample list of 34 residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 34 residents residing in facility. Findings include: The Daily Census Midnight Report dated 7/16/23 documents 34 residents residing in facility. On 7/16/23 at 12:00 PM, V13 (Head Cook) applied gloves to plate lunch meal. V13 rubbed V13's temple area on face two separate times while wearing serving gloves. V13 then used same contaminated gloves to serve meals. V13 (Head Cook) wore same contaminated gloves to adjust V13's glasses one time, then a separate time, V13 used same contaminated gloves to remove glasses. V13 picked up a meal card from the floor, removed gloves, and used the sink sprayer to rinse the tips of V13's fingers on Left hand for less than two seconds. V13 did not use hand hygiene during meal service after contaminating serving utensils used to plate resident meals. On 7/16/23 at 12:45 PM, V13 (Head Cook) stated, I can't believe I even did that. I know better than to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-07-19 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have the required members attend the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings. This failure has the potential to affect all 34 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 7/17/23 at 9:30 AM, the QAPI Quarterly Meeting sign in sheets provided by V1 (Administrator) documents the Quarter 4 of 2022 meeting dated 10/4/22 sign in sheet did not have a Director of Nursing in attendance, the Quarter 1 of 2023 meeting dated 1/3/23 sign in sheet did not have a Director of Nursing in attendance, and the Quarter 2 of 2023 meeting dated 4/4/23 sign in sheet did not have a Director of Nursing in attendance. On 7/17/23 at 9:35 AM, V1 (Administrator) confirmed that they did not have a Director of Nursing (DON) at those meetings. V1 stated that they just hired a DON in May, and they went a long time without one. The facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report dated 7/16/23 documents 34 residents reside in the facility.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-19 · tag F0912 — widespread
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide bedrooms that measure at least 80 square feet per resident bed. This failure affects 34 out of 34 residents all of whom occupy Medicare or Medicaid certified beds in the facility. Findings include: The facility Daily Midnight Census Report dated 7/16/23 documents 34 residents reside in facility. The undated Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Certification and Transmittal, documents 80 of the facility's 80 beds are certified Title 18 (Medicare) and/or Title 19 (Medicaid). Rooms 402-407 are double occupancy and dually certified for Medicare and Medicaid, while rooms 101-112, 201-210, 300-311 and 401 are double occupancy and certified for Medicaid. On 7/17/23 at 1:30 PM, observed V8 (Maintenance Director) measure a resident room. Room measured 72.5 square feet per resident bed in a double occupancy room. Observed R33's room to contain two twin beds, two dressers, one recliner chair, a double-sized closet and privacy curtain to separate beds. On 7/17/23 at 2:00 PM, R33 stated, My room is fine the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have comprehensive care plans for four of twelve residents (R5, R8, R15, R19) reviewed for care plans in the sample list of 23. Findings include: 1.) R5's Order Summary dated 7/16/23 documents diagnoses including Metabolic Encephalopathy, Cerebral Infarction, Dementia, Repeated Falls, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Muscle Weakness, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Difficulty in Walking, Unsteadiness on Feet, Cognitive Communication Deficit and Unspecified Dementia with Agitation. This Order Summary documents R5 was admitted on [DATE]. The facility's Fall Analysis Log provided on 7/16/23 documents R5 had a fall on 6/29/23 where R5 slid off the footrest of the recliner and on 7/12/23 where R5 attempted an unsafe transfer. R5's Baseline Care Plan dated 6/5/23 does not document any risk for falling or any interventions to prevent falls. R5's Bed Rail/Transfer Bar Evaluation dated 6/5/23 documents R5 has a history of falls. R5's Care Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete psychotropic medication assessments, implement/evaluate resident centered interventions, and identify and track targeted behaviors for four of six residents (R19, R12, R9 and R18) reviewed for psychotropic medications in a sample list of 23 residents. Findings include: 1. R19's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for July, 1.2023 to July 31,2023 include orders for: 1. CLONAZEPAM (antianxiety) 0.5 Milligram Give 1 tablet orally at bedtime 2. QUETIAPINE (antipsychotic) 25 MG TAB Give 1 tablet orally at bedtime. 3. TRAZODONE (anti-depressant) 150 MG TABLET Give 2 tablet orally at bedtime. 4. VENLAFAXINE ER (antidepressant) 150 MG Capsules Give 1 capsule orally two times a day. R19's Psychotropic Medication Quarterly evaluations are dated 8/26/22, 11/22/22, and 5/25/23. Therefore, they are not done on a quarterly basis. There is no documented psychotropic assessment for R19's Venlafaxine ER. There are no resident specific targeted behaviors being tracked. No nonpharmacological interventions are documented. 2. R12's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-19 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete Psychotropic Medication consent forms for three (R9, R18, R33) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a sample list of 23 residents. Findings include: 1.) R9's Medical Record documents medical diagnoses of Depression, Anxiety and Bipolar disorder. R9's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated June 2023 documents a physician order dated 6/27/23 for Trazadone 25 mg every 24 hours as needed. This same POS documents a physician order for Divalproex Sodium Extended Release (ER) 500 mg every bedtime. R9's undated Psychotropic Medication Consent form documents R9's Trazadone (antidepressant, sedative) 25 milligrams (mg) daily at bedtime was changed to As Needed. This same document does not document benefits to R9, nor date consent was signed, nor witness to signing of consent. R9's undated Psychotropic Medication Consent form for Divalproex Sodium 500 mg every bedtime does not include a witness signature. On 7/17/23 at 1:40 PM, R9 stated I take some meds for my condition. They (medications) help me. They…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement resident centered fall interventions and failed to completely investigate falls/determine root cause for one of five residents (R5) reviewed for falls in a sample list of 23. Findings include: 1.) R5's Order Summary dated 7/16/23 documents diagnoses including Metabolic Encephalopathy, Cerebral Infarction, Dementia, Repeated Falls, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Muscle Weakness, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Difficulty in Walking, Unsteadiness on Feet, Cognitive Communication Deficit and Unspecified Dementia with Agitation. This Order Summary documents R8 was admitted on [DATE]. R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R5 requires extensive assistance of two staff for transfers and limited assistance of one staff member for ambulating in R5's room. R5's Fall Investigation dated 6/29/23 at 6:00 AM documents, Incident Description: (R5) laying on floor on left side. Lift chair beside (R5) with leg rest up. (R5) states…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer oxygen at the correct setting for one of two residents (R8) reviewed for oxygen administration in the sample list of 23. Findings include: The facility's Oxygen Therapy policy with a reviewed date of March, 2019 documents, Oxygen (O2) is administered to promote adequate oxygenation and provide relief of symptoms of respiratory distress. Procedure: 1. Verify physician's order. 8. Adjust delivery rate per the physician's order. R8's Order Summary dated 7/16/23 documents diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes, Cerebral Infarction, Hypertension and Presence of Cardiac Pacemaker. This Order Summary documents an order for oxygen at 2 - 5 liter per minute per nasal cannula continuously every day and night shift with a start date of 2/1/23. On 7/16/23 at 9:21 AM, R8 is in R8's bed and has oxygen on via a nasal cannula and the oxygen concentrator is on and set at 1.5 liters per minute. On 7/17/23 at 9:46 AM, R8 is in R8's bed and R8's oxygen concentrator is set at 1.5 liters per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent cross contamination during pressure ulcer dressing change for one (R186) resident of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: R186's Medical Diagnosis list documents a diagnosis of Stage 4 Sacral Pressure Ulcer. R186's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R186 as moderately cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R186 as requiring extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and extensive assistance of one person for personal hygiene. R186's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated July 2023 documents a physician order for Eravacycline Dihydrochloride Intravenous Solution Reconstituted 50 milligrams (mg) every 12 hours for wound infection. This same POS documents a physician order for Linezolid Oral Tablet 600 MG twice daily for Stage 4 Sacral Pressure Ulcer infection. On 7/17/23 at 2:20 PM, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) completed R186's Stage 4 Sacral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-19 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their Antibiotic Stewardship policy for one of two (R19) residents reviewed for Antibiotic Stewardship in a sample list of 23. Findings include: The facility policy titled 'Antibiotic Stewardship Program' reviewed 3/20/23 documents the use of antibiotics in healthcare to protect residents and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance through a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing adverse events associated with antibiotic use. This same policy instructs staff to determine whether the resident's documented signs and symptoms align with the recommended minimum criteria for initiating antibiotics. This same policy instructs staff to determine whether the infection met the criteria for Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) standard definitions for infection surveillance in long term care. R19's diagnoses list printed 7/19/23 at 9:31AM includes the following diagnoses: Chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet of floor space per resident bed. This failure affects 33 residents (R2-R6, R8, R10, R13-R20, R22-R30, R32-R35, R37, R38, R40, R49 and R50) out of 45 residents in the sample list. Findings include:The facility daily Midnight Census Report dated 2/17/26 documents 33 residents (R2-R6, R8, R10, R13-R20, R22-R30, R32-R35, R37, R38, R40, R49 and R50) reside in the undersized rooms. Historical room size documentation and actual measurements demonstrate the facility's rooms 101 through 111, 201 through 210, and 301 through 311 do not provide 80 square feet per resident bed. Rooms 101 through 111 and 201 through 210 provide 73 square feet per resident bed, and rooms 301 through 311 provide 78 square feet per resident bed.On 2/19/26 at 7:10 AM, R35 and R29 both stated they are roommates. R35 and R29 both stated their room is too small. R29 stated it would be nice to have a larger room to have more room to move around.On 2/19/26 at 7:30 AM, R13 and R14 both stated they are roommates.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · No revisit needed
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet of floor space per resident bed. This failure affects 23 residents (R1 through R11, R13, R14, R17 through R24, R26, and R179) on the sample list of 28. Findings include: Historical room size documentation and actual measurements demonstrate the facility's rooms 101 through 111, 201 through 210, and 301 through 311 do not provide 80 square feet per resident bed. Rooms 101 through 111 and 201 through 210 provide 73 square feet per resident bed, and rooms 301 through 311 provide 78 square feet per resident bed. On 8/6/24 at 11:30 AM, V1, Administrator, stated, I am aware of the undersized rooms. It is every room except for the back hall (400 hall). We get the tag every year and then we have to go through the process of applying for a waiver because there isn't anything we can do about it. The facility's Declaration of Room Sizes dated as revised 8/1/21 documents rooms 101 through 111, 201 through 210, and 301 through 311 do not meet the requirements for 80 square feet per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-07-19 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post daily Nurse staffing. This failure has the potential to affect all 34 residents residing in facility. Findings include: The Facility Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report dated 7/16/23 documents 34 residents reside in facility. On 7/16/23, 7/17/23 and 7/18/23 there was no daily nurse staffing information posted in the facility. On 7/17/23 at 12:01 PM, V1 (Administrator) confirmed there is no daily nurse staffing information posted in the facility. V1 stated V1 was not aware that it needed to be posted.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to POINTE MANAGEMENT — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AFMZL, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 12/01/2024
ECAPITAL HEALTHCARE CORPOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2024
CHANKIN, KEVINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 12/01/2024
LINCOLN HEALTHCARE GROUP, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
LINICARE HOLDCO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
DOUGHTY, TYLERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
LEVOVITZ, YERUCHOMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
OLIGSCHLAEGER, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
SPADE, AMANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
WEBSTER, SHIMONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
WEISS, AHARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
PLANTE & MORAN PLLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$550K
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 88%Medicare 6%Other / private 6%

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $550K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$270per resident / day
operating cost
$8,200per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$265per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145836. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next