Vandalia Healthcare & Senior Living
1500 West St Louis Avenue, Vandalia, IL 62471 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 116 certified beds · (618) 283-4262 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $9,568 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-20)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 23.1% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.3% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 54.2% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.3% | 14.3% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.7% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.2% | 91.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.4% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.8% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 27.8% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.5% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 65.2% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 8.8% | 26.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 24.5% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.2–15.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 71.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 36.3 residents a day — about 31% occupied, or roughly 80 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.06 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.17 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-11-20 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dental services for 1 of 1 resident (R33) reviewed for dental services in the sample of 29. This failure resulted in R33's cavity and broken teeth going unaddressed and R33 acquiring an abscess requiring antibiotic treatment and ongoing pain. Findings include:R33's admission Record documents an admission date of 10/23/2013, with diagnoses including in part type 2 diabetes, longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. R33's admission documents R33's payer source is listed as Medicaid. R33's Minimum Date Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, indicating R33's cognition is intact. R33's Physician's Order Summary documents R33 has and order for Acetaminophen 500 MG (milligrams) tablet, given 2 tablets orally as needed for mild pain up to 3 times a day, with a start date of 8/1/23. On 11/17/2025 at 11:20 AM, R33 stated he has had a tooth pain and a cavity for about a year that he has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-08-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional supplementation as recommended for three (R3, R15, and R4) of six residents reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 27. This failure resulted in significant weight loss for R3. Findings include: 1. R3's face sheet documents an admission date of 02/19/2024, with diagnoses including: acute kidney failure, chronic atrial fibrillation, chronic venous hypertension with inflammation of bilateral lower extremity, anxiety disorder, hyperuricemia without signs of inflammatory arthritis and tophaceous disease, malignant neoplasm of colon, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, and osteoarthritis. R3's Care Plan documents a focus area titled Nutrition, dated 04/24/24, documents: the resident has potential nutritional problem r/t (related to) diet restrictions with an intervention dated 02/27/24 stating: RD (Registered Dietician) to evaluate and make diet change recommendations PRN (as needed). R3's Dietician Review, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's wound dressing was changed in accordance with physician's orders for 1 of 1 resident (R20) reviewed for wounds in the sample of 29. Findings include:R20's admission Record documents an admission date of 10/19/25, with diagnoses including in part cellulitis of right lower limb, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, prediabetes, and personal history of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection. R20's Minimum data Set (MDS) documents a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, indicating R20's cognition is intact. R20's Care Plan documents R20 is on antibiotic therapy related to right leg cellulitis and R20 has actual impairment to skin integrity of right posterior lower leg related to cellulitis. R20's Order Summary documents, cleanse wound to right lower extremity with wound cleanser, apply zinc barrier cream, apply calcium alginate over open areas, wrap with gauze then (elastic compression) wrap daily and as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the doctor and obtain treatment orders when the presence of a pressure area was detected for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for pressure areas in the sample of 29.R4's admission Record documents an admission date of 11/11/2024, with the following diagnoses in part: early-onset cerebellar ataxia, unspecified, sepsis, unspecified organism, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia.R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 2, indicating R4 is severely cognitively impaired. R4's care plan documents a focus area of has impairment to skin integrity. with interventions including, Monitor/document/report PRN (as needed) any changes in current wound and/or skin status: appearance, color, wound healing, s/sx (signs and symptoms) of infection (such as redness, swelling, drainage, foul smell, decline in function) and reduced mobility, wound size (length X width X depth), stage. Report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administrator intravenous medications safely for 1 of 1 (R25) resident reviewed for intravenous medication administration in a sample of 29. Findings include:R25's admission Record documents an admission date of 11/7/25, with diagnoses including in part infection following a procedure, encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the genitourinary system, peritoneal abscess, and long-term use of antibiotics. R25's Minimum Date Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating R25's cognition is intact. R25's Care Plan documents implementation of enhanced barrier precaution due to R25 has surgical wounds with wound vacuum and/or dressing and secretions or excretions that are unable to be covered or contained and R25 is on intravenous medications and has a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line related to wound infection. R25's Order Summary Report, dated 11/19/25, documents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record revied the facility failed to administration medication according to the standards of practice for 1 of 5 (R18) residents reviewed for medication administration in a sample of 29. Findings include:R18's admission Record documents an admission date of 7/28/25, with diagnoses including in part type 2 diabetes, hypertension, hypothyroidism, atrial fibrillation, weakness, chronic kidney disease, and depression. R18's Minimum Date Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents a Brief Assessment of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, indicating R18's cognition is intact. R18's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 11/1/25-11/30/25, documents R18 was given absorbic acid, levothyroxine, metoprolol succinate, modafinil, multivitamin, omeprazole, potassium chloride, sertraline, colace, eliquis, tylenol, and meclizine with his morning medication pass on 11/17/25. On 11/17/25 at 10:39 AM, there were cup of pills sitting on the bedside table beside R18's bed. R18 stated the nurse didn't wake…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post enhanced barrier precaution signage and provide PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) for a resident and failed to follow proper infection control practices during resident care, for 2 of 2 residents (R4, R25) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 29. Finding include:1. R4's admission Record documents an admission date of 11/11/2024, with the following diagnoses: early-onset cerebellar ataxia, unspecified, sepsis, unspecified organism, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia.R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 2, indicating R4 is severely cognitively impaired.R4's care plan documents a focus of Implementation of Enhanced Barrier, with an initiation date of 9/17/25, with interventions including Use enhanced barrier protection during high contact care activities. R4's Physician's order sheet documents an active order for Enhanced Barrier Precautions, with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based in interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement new interventions to prevent falls for 1 of 3 (R6) residents reviewed for falls in a sample of 7.Findings included:Per admission Record, R6 was admitted to this facility on 5/18/2023, with diagnoses of dementia with moderate anxiety, unsteadiness on feet, and history of prostate cancer.R6's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 7/10/25, documented R6 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 2 out of 15 total, which indicates R6 has severe cognitive impairment. This same MDS documented R6 is dependent on staff for all transferring and toileting, and needs partial to moderate assistance with showers.R6's Fall Risk Evaluation, dated 7/7/2025, documented R6 is at risk for fall.R6's Care Plan included a focus area of:1. Resident had an unwitnessed fall 7/31/25 with intervention of pressure alarm (to be used) all shifts (for R6). 2. Fall: (R6) has had an actual fall 7/2/2025 with intervention of nursing staff to remain present in dining room during meals. 3. Risk for falls r/t (related to) dementia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents timely. This has the potential to affect all 37 residents currently residing at the facility. Findings Include: The facility Resident Matrix provided to this surveyor on 4/7/25 document 37 residents currently reside at the facility. 1. R2's admission Record with a print date of 4/8/25 documents R2's admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include acute and chronic respiratory failure, heart failure, sleep apnea, diabetes, morbid obesity, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 1/3/25, documents R2 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R2 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R2 requires substantial/maximal assistance for toileting. R2's current Care Plan documents a Focus Area of, ADL's (activities of daily living) Self care deficit-needs supervision and/or assist to complete quality care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-08 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespreadEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a bedtime snack. This has the potential to affect all 37 residents who currently reside at the facility. Findings Include: The facility Resident Matrix provided to this surveyor on 4/7/25 documents 37 residents currently reside at the facility. On 4/7/25 at 1:00 PM, V4 (Ombudsman) stated she frequently attends the Resident Council Meetings at the facility. V4 stated R3 and R4 reported to her they were not getting snacks served at the facility unless the State Survey Agency was in the facility. On 4/7/25 at 11:30 AM, R3 and R4 stated they are served bedtime snacks. R3 and R4 stated they get them on the tray with their evening meal. On 4/7/25 at 1:29 PM, R2 stated he recently had an issue getting snacks, but after he complained he started getting them again. R2's admission Record, with a print date of 4/8/25, documents R2's admitted to the facility on [DATE],3 with diagnoses that include acute and chronic respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered timely for 2 of 5 (R2 and R3) residents reviewed for call lights in the sample of 12. Findings Include: 1. R2's admission Record, with a print date of 4/8/25, documents R2's admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include acute and chronic respiratory failure, heart failure, sleep apnea, diabetes, morbid obesity, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 1/3/25, documents R2 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, which indicates R2 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R2 requires substantial/maximal assistance for toileting. R2's current Care Plan documents a Focus Area of, ADL's (activities of daily living) Self care deficit-needs supervision and/or assist to complete quality care and/or poorly motivated to complete ADL's R/T (related to): reduced mobility and Obesity. Date Initiated: 01/23/2024. This Focus area includes the intervention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who require assistance receive a shower for 3 (R2, R3, and R5) of 5 dependent residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living assistance in the sample of 21. 1. R2's admission Record documented an admission date of 12/17/24, and included diagnoses of unspecified intellectual disabilities and muscle weakness. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicating R2 has severe cognitive impairment. The MDS Section for Functional Abilities and Goals documented R2 as dependent for shower/bathing self. R2's Care Plan documented a Focus Area of: ADL's (Activities of Daily Living): Self care deficit-needs assist to complete quality care initiated on 12/28/24. Corresponding interventions include R2 will receive (showers) 2 times per week. Provide bathing, hygiene, dressing, and grooming per resident's preference as able. R2's Shower/Abnormal Skin reports (paper documentation)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident rooms and resident equipment were maintained in a state of good repair for 5 of 5 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4 and R12) reviewed for environment in a sample of 14. Findings include: 1. On 12/5/24 at 11:50AM, R1's bathroom was observed to have water leaking from the front of his toilet. R1's tiles behind his toilet were all laying on the floor away from the wall. R1's toilet was crooked and not positioned correctly and away from the wall. On 12/05/24 at 11:50 AM, R1 who was alert to person, place, and time, stated he knows the toilet leaks in the front and that the toilet is crooked. R1 said that he knows the tiles have fallen down behind the toilet as well. R1 said someone was supposed to be fixing it. 2. On 12/05/24 at 9:21AM, R2's bathroom toilet was observed was to not be secure to the floor and was easily moved around. R2's window sill in room had dust, dirt, debris along with cobwebs noted to top of the window. On 12/05/24 at 9:21AM, R2 who was alert to person, place, and time, stated he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe water temperatures for 14 of 14 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13 and R14) reviewed for water temperatures in a sample of 14. Findings include: On 12/5/24 at 8:54 AM, a digital metal stemmed thermometer used for taking temperatures for this survey was checked for accuracy using the ice-point method, and was accurate within +/_ 2 degrees Fahrenheit. 1. On 12/5/2024 at 9:12 AM, the hot water temperature taken with a calibrated digital metal stemmed thermometer was taken at the handsink of the shared bathroom of R1 and R10, and registered 120.2 degrees Fahrenheit. On 12/5/24 at 9:12 AM, R1 who was alert to person, place, and time, stated the maintenance man told him a week ago the bathroom water temp was 118. R1 then stated the water is hot, but that it has never burned him. 2. On 12/5/2024 at 9:16 AM, the hot water temperature taken with a calibrated digital metal stemmed thermometer was taken…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a full time Director of Nursing and to ensure Registered Nurse coverage 8 consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. This failure has the potential to affect all 33 residents who reside at the facility. Findings Include: The facility's Social Service Need Notice, dated 6/12/24, documents residents concern of the Administrator not being out on the floor more. V28 (Former Administrator) documented on this form, the Administrator does make daily rounds however is needing to do other things due to V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) being on the floor. On 7/29/24 at 12:09 PM and 7/30/24 at 12:13 PM, V2 (DON) was working the floor as a floor nurse and passing medications to residents. V2 was the only nurse on the unit both days at these times. On 7/30/24 at 12:13 PM, V2 stated V2 used to be the DON, but has not had any office time as DON for two months due to working 12 hour days, 3 days a week on the floor as a floor nurse. V2 stated V2 recently submitted V2's resignation from that position due to not having time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and serve food in a safe and sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards. This has the potential to affect all 33 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: On 07/29/24 at 9:51 AM during the initial tour of the kitchen, there were three containers of thickened juice, one kiwi and strawberry flavored and two orange flavored, opened and in the refrigerator with no dates on them. There were two bags of cereal, one whole grain toasted oats and one bran flakes, that were opened with no dates on them. There was a bag of dried milk opened with no date on it. There were also two containers of liquid eggs opened with no dates on them and one package of lunchmeat ham opened with no date on it in the walk in cooler. On 07/29/24 at 9:51 AM during the initial tour of the kitchen, there was a scoop inside the sugar bin laying on top of the sugar and a scoop in the container of coffee laying on top of the ground coffee. On 07/29/24 at 11:35 AM during lunch service, V27 (Dietary) touched the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespreadMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an accessible call system for residents in the shower room or the community bathroom. This failure has the potential to affect all 33 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: On 07/29/24 at 1:35 PM, the hall bathroom/shower room on E-Hall was noted to have a call light box on the wall, but no pull cord was observed to be attached to the toggle switch. Thus, the call light near the toilet was not accessible as it could not be reached from the toilet or the floor without a pull cord. The shower stall in this bathroom/shower room also did not contain any call system. On 07/29/24 at 1:39 PM, the hall bathroom/shower room on the D-Hall was noted to have a call light box on the wall, but no pull cord was observed to be attached to the toggle switch. Thus, the call light near the toilet was not accessible as it could not be reached from the toilet or the floor without a pull cord. The shower stall did not contain any call system. On 07/29/24 at 2:17 PM, the hall bathroom/shower room on A-Hall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet per resident bed in multible occupancy resident bedrooms. This failure affects four (R7, R10, R15, R21) of four residents reviewed for environment in the sample of 27. Findings include: Observations on 8/1/2024 at 9:00 AM, revealed R7 resided in a room certified for double occupancy. This room contained two beds, a dresser, two bedside tables and one over the bed table and had limited area to move around inside the room. V4 (Maintenance Director) used a tape measure and measured R7's bedroom. The bedroom measured 136 inches by 151 inches which equals 142.61 total square feet, and equals 71.31 square feet per resident bed. Observations on 8/1/2024 at 9:10 AM, revealed R10 resided in a room certified for double occupancy. This room contained two beds, two bedside tables, one over the bed table, three trash cans, one isolation supply cart, one bedside commode and one dresser, and had limited area to move around inside the room. V4 used a tape measure to measure R10's bedroom. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote resident independence and dignity while providing care by neglecting to explain a task prior to beginning and allowing the resident time to perform the task independently for one (R31) of six residents reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 27. Findings Include: R31's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 6/28/24, documents R31 has moderate cognitive impairments. On 7/29/24 at 10:48 AM, R31 stated, Yesterday {7/28/24} around 2:00 PM, a bigger girl was very rough with me during cares. R31 explained R31 is normally able to turn over in bed by herself with just a little help but this bigger girl was in a hurry to get her job done and just pushed me over hard and fast. R31 stated this action caused R31 to yell out What are you doing? R31 stated a man across the hall must have heard R31 yell because the man yelled back, What are you doing to her? R31 explained there was also a supervisor present. R31 thought the girl might have gotten fired, but then was back today {7/29/24}. R31 also stated the big girl made it known…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor resident choices regarding preferences for sleeping/waking schedules for one (R16) of one resident reviewed for Self-determination in a sample of 27. Findings include: R16's face sheet documents an admission date of 11/23/24, with diagnoses that include depression and insomnia. R16's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents chair/bed-to-chair transfer: the ability to transfer to and from a bed to a chair (or wheelchair) as Dependent designating: helper does all of the effort, resident does none of the effort to complete the activity .or, the assistance of two or more helpers is required for the resident to complete the activity. On 07/29/24 at 1:53 PM, R16 was alert to person, place, and time and stated the one thing he just does not agree with at the facility is they get him up too early, then he will just sit in his room. R16 stated sometimes they will take him to the dining room at 5:00 AM, and he will sit down there with nothing to do…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for one (R4) of 12 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments in the sample of 27. Findings Include: R4's ongoing weight log documents the following weights: 12/21/23 - 132 pounds and 6/1/24 - 111.4 pounds. This change in weight calculates as a 15.61% weight loss in six months. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], does not document a significant weight loss. On 7/31/24 at 12:52 PM, V13 (MDS/Care Plan Coordinator) stated significant weight losses should be coded on the MDS. The facility Comprehensive Assessment/MDS Policy, dated 11/1/17, documents the facility shall make every effort to ensure the MDS is accurate. Should an inaccuracy in coding be found, the facility shall follow the instructions for amending the assessment found in the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Manual.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for skin protection for one (R6) of two residents reviewed for standards of practice in the sample of 27. Findings Include: R6's July 2024 Physician Orders document an order for R6 to wear protective skin sleeves at all times related to being prone to skin tears. On 7/29/24 at 11:25 AM and 7/30/24 at 12:07 PM, R6 was sitting up in a reclining wheeled chair without the ordered protective skin sleeves in place. On 7/30/24 at 12:28 PM, V15 (Certified Nursing Assistants/CNA's) and V16 (CNA) both stated R6 is to wear protective skin sleeves at all times, and explained R6 isn't wearing them because they don't know know where they are. R6's Care Plan, last updated 7/24/24, documents R6 is supposed to have arm sleeve protectors in place at all times. On 7/30/24 at 1:39 PM, V13 (Minimum Data Set/Care Plan Coordinator) confirmed R6 is supposed to wear arm sleeve protectors at all times.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Deficiencies at this level require more than 1 Deficient Practice Statement. A. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to position a resident in an upright position and follow swallowing precautions per orders during meals to prevent choking episodes for one (R6) of 12 residents reviewed for dining on the sample list of 27. Findings Include: R6's Diagnosis Report, dated 7/31/24, documents a diagnosis of Dysphagia. R6's July 2024 Order Summary documents an order for swallow precautions and a Carbohydrate Controlled/No added Salt diet of pureed texture with pudding/extremely thick consistency liquids. R6's Care Plan, updated 7/24/24, documents R6 requires a pureed diet with pudding thick liquids and is dependent on staff assistance for feeding. R6 is to stay awake/alert during meals; staff are to provide small bites and alternate liquids and solids, monitoring for aspiration such as coughing, congestion, and watery eyes. R6's head of bed is to be elevated after meals. Along with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the worsening of pressure ulcers for one (R4) resident reviewed for pressure ulcer care in the sample of 27. Findings Include: The facility's Quality Assurance (QA) Weekly Skin Eval Documentation List, dated 7/26/24, documents R4 has a Stage III Pressure Ulcer to the lower right buttock. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R4 is at risk for pressure ulcers and has one Stage III Pressure Ulcer. R4's Care Plan, dated 4/25/24, documents R4 is at high risk for pressure ulcers according to R4's Skin Risk Assessment. This Care Plan was updated on 6/27/24, and documents R4 has a stage III pressure ulcer to the right lower buttock with an intervention to complete pressure ulcer treatments per physician orders. R4's Medical Record {computerized or paper} does not contain any pressure ulcer assessments. On 7/30/24 at 12:13 PM, V2 (Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident after a fall and failed to implement interventions for one (R28) of eight residents reviewed for falls in a sample of 27. The findings include: R28's Face Sheet, dated 08/01/24, documents an admission date of 08/17/23, with diagnoses in part of unspecified dementia, vascular dementia, diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, brief psychotic disorder, intermittent explosive disorder, dementia in other diseases with other behavioral disturbance, pseudobulbar affect, unspecified lack of coordination, difficulty in walking, unsteadiness on feet, and muscle weakness. R28's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicates R28 has moderate cognitive impairment. R28's MDS documents he is dependent for toileting, showering, and upper and lower body dressing. R28 requires substantial/maximal assistance with rolling left to right, sit to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a urinary catheter was secured in accordance with the plan of care, and failed to complete incontinence care and catheter care in accordance with standards of practice to prevent irritation and cross contamination for two (R6 and R32) of two residents reviewed for incontinence/catheter care in the sample of 27. Findings Include: 1. R6's Care Plan, dated 4/27/24, documents R6 has an alteration in bladder elimination which resulted in R6 having a Suprapubic Catheter being placed by an unidentified Urologist on 6/19/23 for Obstructive Uropathy. This care plan documents to complete catheter care and maintenance per orders and secure catheter to avoid tension. R6's July 2024 Physician Orders document an order for Suprapubic Catheter Care every shift. On 7/31/24 at 10:19 AM, V17 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) entered R6's room to provide catheter care. V17 obtained an over bed table from R6's roommate, which had food crumbs/debris on it.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure as needed psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days for one (R4) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 27. Findings Include: R4's Pharmacy Consultation Report, dated 1/10/24, documents R4 received Lorazepam {Benzodiazepine} 0.5 mg (milligrams) BID (twice a day) and 1 mg every four hours as needed for anxiety. This report documents to please assess R4's medication dosage (s), condition, behaviors, and if clinically appropriate consider reducing a medication in modest increments. On 2/14/24, V18 (Physician) is documented to have declined this recommendation, however, did not document a resident specific rationale why this GDR (Gradual Dose Reduction) was not attempted. R4's July 2024 Physician Order Sheet documents an order received on 8/1/23 for Lorazepam {Benzodiazepine} 1 mg (milligram) every four hours as needed for Anxiety. R4's July 2024 MAR (Medication Administration Record) does not document R4 has received any as needed doses of Lorazepam. On 7/30/24 at 2:53 PM, V13,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow current standards and practices for infection control regarding handling of soiled linens, hand hygiene, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, and Contact Isolation Precautions to prevent the spread of infection. This failure affects 3 (R6, R13 and R32) of 3 residents reviewed for infection control on the sample list of 27. Findings Include: 1. R6's July 2024 Physician Orders document an order for a Suprapubic Catheter size 16 French and for Suprapubic Catheter Care to be completed every shift. R6's Care Plan, dated 7/24/24, documents R6 has a Suprapubic Catheter due to a diagnosis of Obstructive Uropathy and is on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). On 7/29/24 at 11:01 AM, R6 was sitting up in a reclining wheelchair in the room. There was no EBP signage hanging outside of R6's room, no Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) outside of R6's room, and no hamper or container inside of R6's room for PPE to be disposed into. On 7/31/24 at 10:19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the Influenza Immunization Policy to ensure an influenza vaccine was offerred/provided for one (R21) of five residents reviewed for Influenza Immunizations in the sample of 27. Findings include: R21's Care plan documents an admission date of 10/06/22, and diagnoses including: frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and muscle weakness. R21's Physician Order Sheet documents an order dated 11/27/23 of Immunization: may have annual flu vaccine with consent unless contraindicated with an order status of active. R21's current medical record contained a section titled, Immunizations, and under the category labeled Influenza is documented the date of 10/20/22. On 07/30/24 at 10:10 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated she printed off a list of all the current immunizations for all the residents. V1 provided this list and it was titled, Covid Vaccine. This document has a column titled, Influenza and documents R21's most current influenza vaccination was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders to administer anti-anxiety medication as ordered for 1of 5 (R4) residents reviewed for physician orders in a sample of 12. Finding include: R4's admission record, dated 4/03/24, documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Cerebral infarction, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following cerebral infraction affecting left non-dominant side, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity with agitation, Chronic Kidney Disease, Anemia, Hypertension, Morbid obesity, hyperlipidemia, Major depressive disorder recurrent, anxiety, Gastroesophageal reflux disease, Post Traumatic Stress Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, and pain. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents in Section C a Brief interview for mental status a score of 13, which indicates R4 is cognitively intact. Section D documents under mood little interest or pleasure in doing things present 2-6 days in a 14-day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to determine that drug records were in order, and an account of all controlled drugs were maintained and periodically reconciled for 1of 5 (R4) residents reviewed for controlled substances in a sample of 12. Findings include: R4's admission record, dated 4/03/24, documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Cerebral infarction, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following cerebral infraction affecting left non-dominant side, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity with agitation, Chronic Kidney Disease, Anemia, Hypertension, Morbid obesity, hyperlipidemia, Major depressive disorder recurrent, anxiety, Gastroesophageal reflux disease, Post Traumatic Stress Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, and pain. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents in Section C a Brief interview for mental status a score of 13, which indicates R4 is cognitively intact. Section D documents under mood little interest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure coverage was provided by a Registered Nurse (RN) 8 hours a day, 7 days a week. This has the potential to affect all 36 residents living in the facility. The findings include: The facility schedules for 11/01/23 to 12/20/23 were reviewed, and documents no RN coverage for Saturday 11/11/23, Saturday 11/25/23, Sunday 11/26/23, Saturday 12/02/23, Sunday 12/03/23, Sunday 12/10/23, Saturday 12/16/23, and Sunday 12/17/23. On 12/18/23 at 2:25 PM, V1(Administrator) stated they currently don't have enough Registered Nurses to staff 8 hours a day 7 days a week. V1 said she does have 3 Registered Nurses at this time. V1 said they did hire another Registered Nurse, but is waiting for her license approval in Illinois. V1 confirmed the facility was without Registered Nurse coverage on the dates documented on the schedule (11/11/23, 11/25/23, 11/26/23, 12/2/23, 12/3/23, 12/10/23, 12/16/23, and 12/17/23). The facility Census Report, dated 12/18/23, documents a census of 36 residents.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they had a Registered Nurse (RN)working 8 hours a day, 7 days a week. This failure has the potential to effect all 36 residents residing at the facility. Findings Include: The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 8/28/23, documents 36 residents reside at the facility. On 08/29/23 at 11:20 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated they do not have RN coverage 8 hours a day, 7 days a week. V1 stated, V2 (Director of Nurses) is a Registered Nurse, and is at the facility for any skilled nursing that requires an RN. V1 stated they run continuous ads and are attempting to recruit RN's, but they are in a small rural area, and have to compete with larger areas that are just 30 minutes from the facility. V1 stated they have had interviews, but the RN's do not accept the position once it is offered. The untitled nursing schedules, dated June 2023, July 2023, and August 2023, documents there was no Registered Nurse working on 6/4, 6/11, 6/12, 6/17, 6/18, 6/24, and 6/25, 7/1, 7/2, 7/9, 7/15, 7/16, 7/22, 7/23, 7/29, 7/30,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the education addressing the benefits and risks and/or had the opportunity to receive the 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20 or Prevnar 20) for 4 of 5 (R3, R6, R16, and R31) residents reviewed for immunizations in the sample of 33. Findings Include: 1.R6's admission Record, with a print date of 8/31/23, documents R6 is [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, pancreas and kidney transplants, anemia, and pneumocystis. R6's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 7/28/23, documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 12, which indicates R6 has a moderate cognitive impairment. R6's facility undated Immunization Record documents R6 was administered an unidentified pneumococcal immunization on 11/14/16. On 08/31/23 at 3:13 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated she didn't know what type of pneumonia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the required 80 square feet of floor space per resident for 9 of 9 (R5, R8, R14, R17, R18, R20, R21, R24, R32, and R137) residents reviewed for room size in the sample of 33. Findings Include: On 8/29/23 beginning at 3:03 PM, V7 (Maintenance Director) and V8 (Maintenance Assistant) measured all the resident rooms located on A and B hall that didn't meet the required 80 square feet (sq. ft.) of floor space per resident. The measurements were as follows: rooms [ROOM NUMBER] measured 140 (inches) x 151 which equals 146.81 sq. ft. which indicates 73.40 sq. ft. per resident. rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] measured 141 x 152 which equals 148.83 sq. ft. which indicates 74.42 sq. ft. per resident. rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] measured 142 x 152 which equals 149.88 sq. ft. which indicates 74.94 sq. ft. per resident. room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 148 x 152 which equals 156.22 sq. ft. which indicates 78.11 sq. ft. per resident. room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 149 x…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$9,568 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $9,568 — penalty dated 2025-11-20
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to POINTE MANAGEMENT — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFMZL, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 12/01/2024 |
| ECAPITAL HEALTHCARE CORP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/01/2024 |
| CHANKIN, KEVIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 12/01/2024 |
| LINCOLN HEALTHCARE GROUP, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
| LINICARE HOLDCO LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
| FLICK, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
| LEVOVITZ, YERUCHOM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
| SPADE, AMANDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
| WEBSTER, SHIMON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
| WEISS, AHARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
| PLANTE & MORAN PLLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $353K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145903. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.