Crown Point Health Campus
6685 East 117th Avenue, Crown Point, IN 46307 · Government - County · 145 certified beds · (219) 662-0642 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (67) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $25,665 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-24)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.3% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.4% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.7% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.7% | 1.1% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 16.2% | 25.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.6% | 3.9% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.5% | 11.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.0% | 23.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.7% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.3% | 3.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.0% | 23.3% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.8% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 48.5% | 79.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.3% | 22.2% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.2% | 10.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.70 | 1.61 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.48 | 1.44 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 267 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 49.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 128 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.7%CMS range 52.1–65.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.6%CMS range 9.7–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 49.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 87.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.1%CMS range 6.4–12.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.95 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 145 beds and averages 112.1 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
67 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 56 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was in place to prevent elopement of a resident with diagnoses of dementia and bipolar in a manic state with psychotic features. The resident had indicators of being an elopement risk and behaviors of wanting to exit the facility. The facility was unaware of the resident's where abouts and the resident was found by a Good Samaritan standing in the road, approximately 0.15 miles from the facility, on a highly traveled road. The resident was returned to the facility by the Good Samaritan. (Resident E) The Immediate Jeopardy began on 6/24/25, when the facility was unaware the resident had exited the facility without supervision. The resident walked independently and was found standing on the road that runs in front of the facility at approximately 4:50 a.m. by a Good Samaritan, who assisted the resident back to the facility. The Administrator, Executive Director (ED), and the Director of Nursing (DON), were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were in place and implemented related to correct isolation precautions in place for a resident on contact isolation, contracted staff not following enhanced barrier precautions during care and staff not cleaning a shared blood pressure cuff between residents. (Resident 6, phlebotomist and RN 1)Findings include:1.Resident 6 was observed in her bed on 3/16/26 at 11:15 a.m. There was an enhanced barrier precaution sign on the door and a PPE (personal protective equipment) bin next to the door. The resident's record was reviewed on 3/16/26 at 2:45 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cholecystitis (inflammation of the gallbladder) and urinary tract infection. The resident had been readmitted to the facility on [DATE] following a hospital stay. A Physician's Order, dated 3/13/26, indicated the resident was on contact isolation related to Strep A/ blood culture (Group A streptococcal infection).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to keep the kitchen clean and in good repair related to dirty fans, trash cans, floors, and baseboards for 1 of 1 kitchen. (The Main Kitchen) The facility also failed to ensure a microwave and a refrigerator on 2 of 4 units were clean. (The Memory Care Unit and Independence Hall) Findings include:1. During the Kitchen Sanitation Tour on 3/16/26 at 9:20 a.m., with the Dietary Food Manager (DFM) the following was observed: a. A portable fan was observed on top of the garbage can located next to the handwashing sink. The fan had an accumulation of dirt and dried food spillage. During an interview at that time, the Dietary Food Manager (DFM) indicated the fan needed to be thrown out. b. A white garbage can located next to the handwashing sink had an accumulation of dried food spillage and debris on top of the lid and sides. c. An accumulation of dirt and debris was observed along the baseboards underneath the food prep counter.d. An accumulation of dirt and debris was observed on the floor in front of the oven.e. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medication assessment was complete and a physician's order to self-administer medication was in place, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Resident 127)Finding includes:On 3/16/26 at 11:08 a.m., Resident 127 was observed sitting in the chair in his room. An unopened box of Salonpas patches (medicated pain relief patches) and a Breo Ellipta (respiratory medication) inhaler were on his overbed table.On 3/18/26 at 2:19 p.m., the resident was not in his room, but the Breo Ellipta inhaler remained on his overbed table.On 3/19/26 at 10:21 a.m., the resident was in his room preparing to leave for dialysis. The Breo Ellipta inhaler remained on his overbed table. The resident's record was reviewed on 3/20/26 at 9:23 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].A Physician's Order, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment was accurately completed related to a Wanderguard alarm (wearable device that alarms when approaching a restricted area) not documented for a resident with history of wandering for 1 of 23 MDS assessments reviewed. (Resident 30)Finding includes: The record for Resident 30 was reviewed on 3/18/26 at 2:34 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia.A Care Plan, revised on 6/13/25, indicated the resident was an elopement risk/wanderer related to diagnosis of dementia. Interventions included, but were not limited to, check Wanderguard placement (right ankle) and function.The Physician's Order, dated 12/4/25, indicated Wanderguard to right ankle. Check placement each shift.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/18/25, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The Wander/elopement alarm assessment was marked as 0 indicating not used.During an interview on 3/19/26 at 11:42 a.m., the Administrator indicated an MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the current care plan was implemented related to documentation of food intake for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition and documentation of urinary catheter output for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for catheters. (Residents 32, 62 and 80)Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 32 was reviewed on 3/18/26 at 1:15 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and protein calorie malnutrition. A Care Plan, dated 11/4/25 and reviewed on 1/5/26, indicated the resident had the potential for a nutritional problem related to the diagnoses of dementia, dysphagia, and protein calorie malnutrition. The resident received a mechanically altered diet and had a history of weight loss. Interventions included, but were not limited to, monitor meal consumption and record every meal. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/31/25, indicated the resident had short and long term memory problems and was severely impaired for daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure ADL (activities of daily living) care was provided to a dependent resident related to lack of documentation of incontinence care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for ADL care. (Resident 4)Finding includes:During an interview on 3/16/26 at 11:28 a.m., Resident 4 indicated she was not receiving incontinence care routinely and would be left in a wet brief for long periods of time.Resident 4's record was reviewed on 3/19/26 at 9:44 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (slowly progressive genetic disorders that damage peripheral nerves).A Care Plan, revised on 11/8/24, indicated the resident needed assistance with ADLs. Interventions included, but were not limited to, resident required a one staff assist for bathing and preferred bed baths.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/31/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene.The CNA Task: B&B - Bladder Elimination, indicated there was no documentation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure compression wraps were used for 1 of 1 resident with edema. The facility also failed to ensure physician's orders were in place for a biliary drain (abdominal drain inserted into the liver to assist with bile duct blockage) and the drain was monitored for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for catheters. (Residents 89 and 6)Findings include: 1. On 3/17/26 at 9:51 a.m., Resident 89 was seated in her wheelchair participating in an activity. No tubi grips (compression wraps) were visible to the resident's legs. At 11:51 a.m., the resident was seated in her wheelchair in the dining room. Again, there were no tubi grips visible to the resident's legs. At 3:05 p.m., the resident was seated in a chair in her room. Her pants were pulled down below her knees and her socks were visible. She was not wearing tubi grips on either leg. On 3/19/26 at 2:25 p.m., the resident was seated in her room watching television. During an interview at that time, the resident indicated she only had socks on and nothing else on her legs.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a colostomy (opening in the colon that lets stools pass from the body) received appropriate treatment and services related to a lack of documentation of completed colostomy bag changes and stoma care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for ostomies. (Resident 1)Finding includes:The record for Resident 1 was reviewed on 3/18/26 at 10:39 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, history of cancer of the rectum, rectosigmoid, and anus, and colostomy status.A Care Plan, revised on 6/18/24, indicated the resident had an alteration in gastrointestinal status related to abdominoperineal resection (APR) (surgery that removes your sigmoid colon, rectum and anus) for rectal cancer. The resident had a colostomy. Interventions included, but were not limited to, monitor and record bowel movements (empty ostomy pouch), monitor and record peri-stoma condition, and provide and maintain appropriate ostomy supplies.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/24/26, indicated the resident was severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure G-tube (gastrostomy tube, a tube inserted directly into the stomach) flushes were instilled via gravity for 1 of 9 residents observed for medication administration. (Resident 9)Finding includes: On 3/28/26 at 3:03 p.m., LPN 2 was observed preparing Resident 9's medication. She crushed the pill and placed it in a medication cup. She entered the resident's room, washed her hands, donned a gown and gloves, filled the water bottle with tap water, put the tube feeding on hold, and checked for residual. She inserted the G-tube syringe into the water bottle and drew up 30 cc of water. She opened the G-tube and placed the syringe directly into the tube and pushed the 30 cc of water down the tube using the plunger. She diluted the medication in 30 cc of water and administered the medication and remaining flush by gravity.During an interview on 3/18/26 at 3:15 p.m., LPN 2 indicated she had not administered the initial G-tube flush by gravity. She would always administer the medications by gravity but would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure clinical records were complete and accurately documented related to clarification orders for diet and assistive devices for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility also failed to ensure urinary catheter care was accurately documented for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for catheters. (Residents 41 and 6)Findings include:1. On 3/17/26 at 11:42 a.m., Resident 41 was served a bowl of chicken and rice soup. The soup contained chunks of carrots and chicken. During an interview at that time, CNA 1 indicated the resident had orders for a pureed diet but she thought she could have soup. The CNA indicated the soup had chunks of carrots and chicken and she proceeded to take the soup from the resident. At 11:51 a.m., the resident was served thickened juice in a clear plastic cup. On 3/18/26 at 11:35 a.m., the resident was seated in her wheelchair in the dining room. She was served her lunch and a glass of thickened juice in a clear plastic cup. On 3/19/26 at 11:51 a.m., the resident was seated in her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 56 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's family/Responsible Party was notified for a new medication order, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for family/Responsible Party notification. (Resident O)Finding includes:Resident O's record was reviewed on 8/18/25 at 1:06 p.m The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, osteomyelitis and schizophrenia.A Nurse Practitioner's Progress Note, dated 8/12/25 at 12:29 p.m., indicated the resident voiced she was not able to fall asleep at night and when she does fall asleep, she has difficulty staying asleep. A Nurse Practitioner's Order, dated 8/12/25, indicated melatonin three milligrams was to be administered every night for insomnia.There was no documentation that indicated the resident's Responsible Party/family had been notified of the change in medication.During an interview on 8/19/25 at 3:10 p.m., the Regional Nurse Consultant indicated the Responsible Party/family had not been notified of the medication order.This citation relates to Intake 2590825.3.1-5(a)(3)
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary care and services, related to, treatments to surgical sites were not completed, glucometer monitoring (blood sugar checks) were not completed and orders not clarified for the glucometer monitoring, a thorough admission assessment was not completed, a elopement risk assessment was not completed accurately, insulin was not administered as ordered, and bruising un unknown cause was not investigated and monitored, for 4 of 12 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Residents D, E, F, and M)Findings include:1. During an observation on 7/23/25 at 2:42 p.m., the Wound Nurse indicated Resident D had two surgical wounds located on the left ischium and on the sacral area. There was a dressing on each of the areas with the date of 7/21/25. Both areas were washed and patted dried, covered with calcium alginate (wound treatment) and covered with foam dressings. She indicated the wounds were improving. Resident D’s record was reviewed on 7/24/25 at 10:13 a.m. The diagnoses included, but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act related to an allegation of physical and sexual abuse for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse. (Resident E) Finding includes:Resident E's closed record was reviewed on 7/22/25 at 9:09 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to dementia, bipolar with current manic episodes with psychotic features, and unsteadiness on her feet. The admission date was 6/20/25. A Nurse's Progress Note, dated 6/20/25 at 11:30 p.m., indicated the resident voiced an allegation that she had been both physically and sexually assaulted the day earlier.During an interview on 7/22/25 at 11:35 a.m., the Administrator indicated the allegation had not been investigated or reported immediately to the Administrator, Indiana Department of Health (IDOH), the resident's previous facility, physician, responsible party, or local law enforcement.A Reported IDOH Incident, dated 7/22/25, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's tube feeding was infusing at the correct flow rate for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for feeding tube usage. (Resident H)Finding includes:During an observation on 7/22/25 at 3:03 p.m., the liquid tube feeding for Resident H was not infusing.During an observation on 7/23/25 at 11:51 a.m., the liquid tube feeding of Jevity 1.5 was infusing at 60 cc/hr (cubic centimeters per hour).Resident H's record was reviewed on 7/23/25 at 1:56 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, gastrostomy tube and dysphagia.A Care Plan, dated 5/26/25, indicated a feeding tube was present. The interventions indicated the tube feeding and water flushes were to be administered as ordered by the Physician.An admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 5/28/25, indicated a severely impaired cognitive status and had a feeding tube and it provided 51% or more of daily nutrition and 502 milliliters or more of fluids daily. A Physician's Order, dated 7/17/25, indicated a liquid feeding of Jevity 1.5 at 60 cc/hr…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line had physician's orders for the care and monitoring and the dressing was changed once weekly for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PICC line care. (Resident D)Finding includes:During an observation on 7/23/25 at 2:42 p.m., a PICC line was observed in the resident's left upper arm. The date on the dressing covering the PICC line was 7/13/25. The Wound Nurse indicated the dressing was to be changed weekly.Resident D's record was reviewed on 7/24/25 at 10:13 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, osteomyelitis, stroke, and post-surgical closure and debridement of stage four (full thickness) pressure ulcers. The admission date was 6/20/25.A Skin/Wound Note, dated 6/20/25 at 4:30 p.m., indicated an intravenous (IV) line was observed on the left upper arm.A Physician's Order, dated 6/21/25, indicated ceftriaxone (antibiotic) 2 grams was to be administered daily for osteomyelitis until 7/17/25.There were no physician's orders for the flushes,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly for 2 of 2 medication carts observed. (B wing medication cart and C wing medication cart)Findings include:1. On 7/23/25 at 8:04 a.m., LPN 1 was observed in Resident C's room. The C Wing medication cart was in the hallway and the following medications were sitting on top of the cart unsupervised and accessible to anyone in the hallway:a. 1 bottle of amoxicillin labeled for Resident T.b. 2 Nystatin bottles labeled for Resident U and Resident V.c. 1 tube of wound paste and 1 tube of cooling gel labeled for Resident W.During an interview on 7/23/25 at 8:36 a.m., LPN 1 indicated the medications on top of her cart belonged in the treatment cart and not in the medication cart. LPN 1 indicated the treatment cart was at the end of the hallway and those medications did not belong in her cart. 2. On 7/23/25 at 8:38 a.m., the B wing medication cart was observed with LPN 3 during a medication administration pass for Resident Y. LPN 3 was out of a medication and left her cart to check for it. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented related to an elopement incident and antibiotic administration for 2 of 24 residents reviewed for medical record documentation. (Residents E and D)Findings include: 1. During an interview on 7/22/25 at 5:24 a.m., LPN 2 indicated she had been the nurse assigned to Resident E on 6/23-6/24/25 night shift. On 6/24/25 in the early morning, the resident was in the Dining Room/Lounge, across from the Nurses’ Station, and requested coffee. She drank the coffee and said she was going back to her room. The resident was brought back to the facility through the [NAME] Unit Doors by a community person a little while later. LPN 2 indicated one of the staff members from the [NAME] Unit called the DON and the DON called the Grace Unit and directed her to go to the [NAME] Unit to assist the resident back up to the Grace Unit. There were no injuries observed. The resident was missing from the building for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were in place related to hand hygiene during medication pass for 3 random medication pass observations. (LPN 1 and LPN 3, Residents Z, X and Y)Findings include:1. On 7/23/25 at 8:18 a.m., LPN 1 was observed leaving Resident C's room after administering medication. She then began a medication pass for Resident Z. She popped out all the medication required into a medicine cup and then donned a gown and gloves prior to entering resident Z's room. The residents' blood pressure was checked and pills were administered. She did not wash her hands or use hand sanitizer upon leaving resident C's room prior to preparing resident Z's medication or before donning the gloves upon entering Resident Z's room.2. On 7/23/25 at 8:29 a.m., LPN 1 was observed preparing a medication pass for Resident X. LPN 1 entered the resident's room and checked the blood pressure. She exited the room and prepared the resident's medication. She then re-entered Resident X's room and administered her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician and the resident that a medication was unavailable for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medications. (Resident E) Finding includes: During an interview on 4/8/25 at 11:09 a.m., Resident E indicated she had not received her long-acting insulin this past Saturday and Sunday evening. She had told the nurse where to look for it but apparently she couldn't find it. She was not sure why the nurse had not found it and was not given any further explanation. Record review for Resident E was completed on 4/7/25 at 3:09 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, and multiple sclerosis. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/13/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The Physician's Order Summary, dated 4/2025, indicated Lantus (insulin glargine, long-acting insulin) 25 units subcutaneous at bedtime. The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 4/2025, indicated the Lantus administrations for 4/5/25 at 8:00 p.m. and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document incontinence care for a resident who was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) for 1 of 4 residents who were reviewed for ADLs. (Resident B) Finding includes: Resident B's record was reviewed on 4/7/25 at 10:20 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis) following a cerebral infarction (stroke). The Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/12/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. She was totally dependent on staff for assistance with toileting and transfers. She was frequently incontinent of bladder and always incontinent of bowel. The current Care Plans indicated the resident had episodes of incontinence and was at risk for complications. Interventions included, but were not limited to, encourage fluids, provide incontinence care, and toilet at regular intervals or scheduled voiding. The CNA Task: Incontinence Care was reviewed from 3/17/25 to 4/7/25. The documentation frequency was every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice related to a medication not administered as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident F) Finding includes: Resident F's record was reviewed on 4/9/25 at 2:04 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to neuropathy and arthritis. A Physician's Order, dated 3/29/25, indicated guaifenesin (cough syrup) extended release (ER) 600 mg, one tablet was to be administered every 12 hours for seven days for a cough. (14 doses) The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 3/2025, indicated the guaifenesin had not been administered on 3/29/25 at 9:00 p.m., 3/30/25 at 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m., and 3/31/25 at 9:00 p.m. The guaifenesin was documented as given on 3/31/25 at 9:00 a.m. The MAR, dated 4/2025, indicated the guaifenesin had been administered on April 1-4, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m., and April 5, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. The resident had not received the medication for seven…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide supplements as ordered and document nutritional intake for meals for residents with weight loss for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Residents D and H) Findings include: 1. On 4/8/25 at 11:24 a.m., CNA 3 was observed taking a lunch tray to Resident D. She received a cheeseburger, tater tots, pickles, and a can of soda. There was no Mighty Shake on the tray at the time. During an observation and interview on 4/8/25 at 11:45 a.m., CNA 3 brought out Resident D's tray to return to the tray cart. The resident had picked at the food. There was no Mighty Shake present on the tray. Both CNA 3 and LPN 1 confirmed the resident had not received the Mighty Shake and dietary was responsible for putting those on the trays. Resident D's record was reviewed on 4/7/25 at 11:16 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, protein-calorie malnutrition, and cognitive communication deficit. The resident weighed 100.5 pounds on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with routine medications in a timely manner by the contracted pharmacy, related to medications not available to be administered as ordered by a physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medications. (Resident F) Finding includes: Resident F's record was reviewed on 4/9/25 at 2:04 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to neuropathy and arthritis. An After Visit Summary from the hospital, dated 3/28/25, indicated the resident was being treated for a urinary tract infection. The discharge orders included cephalexin (antibiotic) 500 mg (milligrams), one capsule three times a day for seven days. A Nurse's Progress Note, dated 3/29/25 at 3:32 a.m., indicated the resident was readmitted to the facility and the Physician's Discharge Orders were verified with the physician. a) The Physician's Orders, dated 3/29/25 and discontinued on 3/31/25, indicated cephalexin 500 mg, one tablet was to be given three times a day for infection for seven days. The medication was to be started on 3/29/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-24 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' medical records included documentation the resident or resident representative was provided education on the benefits and potential risk associated with the COVID-19 vaccination and documentation why the vaccine was not administered for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccinations. (Residents 53, B, 201, and 300) Findings include: 1. Resident 53's record was reviewed on 2/21/25 at 9:55 a.m. The COVID-19 vaccination had not been documented as offered or administered since 9/22/22. There was no documentation education on the benefits and potential risk of the the COVID-19 vaccine had been provided to the resident or the resident's representative. 2. Resident B's record was reviewed on 2/21/25 at 10:10 a.m. The resident received the first COVID-19 vaccination on 2/26/22. The COVID-19 vaccination had not been documented as offered or administered since 2/26/22. There was no documentation education on the benefits and potential risk of the the COVID-19 vaccine had been provided to the resident or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to self-administer medication and had a physician's order to self-administer medication for 2 of 2 residents observed self-administering medications. (Residents 41 and 201) Findings include: 1. During a random observation on 2/17/25 at 9:09 a.m., Resident 41 was observed seated in her wheelchair in her room. There was a medicine cup with several pills on her overbed table in front of her. Several minutes later, the pills were again observed on the resident's table. The resident asked if she had to take all of them. RN 1 entered the room and then assisted the resident with taking the medications. During an interview on 2/17/25 at 9:13 a.m., the nurse indicated she had left them with the resident because she was taking her time, and she should not have left the medications with the resident. The resident's record was reviewed on 2/17/25 at 9:20 a.m. There was no self-medication administration assessment and no Physician's order to self-administer medications. 2. On 2/17/25 at 9:35…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and in place for residents with significant weight loss for 2 of 24 care plans reviewed. (Residents 75 and 85) Findings include: 1. Resident 75's record was reviewed on 2/18/25 at 10:55 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, spinal stenosis, iron deficiency anemia and atrial fibrillation. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff assist for toileting and bed mobility. He had a weight loss of 5% or more in a month or 10% or more in 6 months and was not on a physician-prescribed weight loss regimen. The resident's admission weight on 8/8/24 was 324.4 pounds. The resident's weight on 11/5/24 was 293.6 pounds and on 2/5/25, was 246.5 pounds. This was a weight loss of 30.8 pounds, a 24% change, in six months. A Dietary Note, dated 2/13/25, indicated the resident had a significant weight loss.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated for 1 of 24 resident care plans reviewed. (Resident 7) Finding includes: On 2/17/25 at 2:46 p.m., Resident 7 was observed in a wheelchair. Her left hand appeared to be contracted (a condition where the fingers or palm of the hand are involuntarily bent or curled in). The resident was unable to communicate if she was able to open her hand or if she wore any splinting devices. The record for Resident 7 was reviewed on 2/20/25 at 10:25 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral palsy, mild intellectual disabilities, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness) following a stroke affecting the left side. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/19/24, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, had a functional limitation in range of motion on one side of the upper extremities, and required assistance from staff with toileting, showering, and transfers. The February 2025 Physician Order Summary indicated the resident may…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document incontinence care for a resident who was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) for 1 of 7 residents who were reviewed for ADLs. (Resident C) Finding includes: During an interview on 2/18/25 at 9:14 a.m., Resident C's Power of Attorney (POA) indicated she had come to the facility on multiple occasions and found the resident in a soaking wet brief. The resident was fully dependent on the staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs) including, but not limited to, toileting, eating, and drinking. The record was reviewed on 2/20/25 at 11:20 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease and dementia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/8/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff for all ADLs including eating, toileting, personal hygiene, and transfers. She was always incontinent of bowel and bladder and received hospice care. The current Care Plans indicated the resident needed assistance with ADLs due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for non-pressure skin condition treatments and non-pressure skin areas were assessed and monitored for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for skin conditions, non-pressure related. (Residents 1 and 16). Findings include: 1. During an interview and observation on 2/17/25 at 9:42 a.m., Resident 1 indicated she had a sore area on her right upper chest. She had it for the last couple of weeks and told the staff about it the night before. The area was observed to be a large scab with the surrounding skin red in color. On 2/20/25 at 11:09 a.m., Resident 1 had a 4 by 4 padded gauze covering the area on her right upper chest. The resident indicated the staff put a cream on it the night before and was keeping it covered so her top would not rub the area. Resident 1's record was reviewed on 2/19/25 at 11:10 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy (affecting the peripheral nerves) and diabetes mellitus. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing related to weekly wound assessments not completed and a physician's treatment order not updated for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Residents D and 4) Findings include: 1. On 2/19/25 at 10:42 a.m., the Wound Nurse was observed providing care for a pressure ulcer on Resident D's left heel. There was a round, dime-sized scabbed area on the left heel. The nurse indicated it was a healing stage 4 pressure ulcer. The resident's record was reviewed on 2/18/25 at 3:05 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's dementia, depression and chronic respiratory failure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 12/24/24, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment, was dependent for toileting, eating, bed mobility and transfers and had a stage 4 pressure ulcer. The Pressure Injury Care Plan, dated 5/29/24, indicated the resident had a history of pressure ulcers and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an order for a palmar guard and a resting hand splint device was followed and in place for a resident with a right hand contracture for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for range of motion. (Resident 42) Finding includes: During random observations on 2/17/24 at 2:17 p.m., on 2/19/25 at 9:26 a.m., and on 2/20/25 at 10:35 a.m., Resident 42 was observed lying in bed. At those times, the resident was observed with her right hand clenched against her chest. On 2/19/25 at 2:01 p.m., CNA 1 indicated the resident could not open her right hand without forcing her hand open or using a hot water towel to open the resident's hand. She had never used a palm protector and did not know if the resident was supposed to have a palm protector applied to her right hand. The record for Resident 42 was reviewed on 2/17/25 at 2:17 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, generalized muscle weakness, and stiffness. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/29/25, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall precautions were in place for a resident with a history of falls for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 34) Finding includes: On 2/19/25 at 1: 49 p.m., Resident 34 was observed seated in his wheelchair in the unit dining room. There were no anti-rollback bars or anti-tippers noted to the wheelchair. On 2/19/25 at 2:50 p.m., Resident 34 was observed seated in his wheelchair propelling himself around the unit dining room. There were no anti-rollback bars or anti-tippers noted to the wheelchair. On 2/20/25 at 10:11 a.m., Resident 34 was observed seated in his wheelchair and was brought to the unit dining room by a CNA. There were no anti-rollback bars or anti-tippers noted to the wheelchair. The record for Resident 34 was reviewed on 2/19/25 at 2:56 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease, hypertension, and depression. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/26/24, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. He had two or more falls…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure urinary output was recorded and the physician was notified for low urinary output as ordered for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident 37) Finding includes: The record for Resident 37 was reviewed on 2/20/25 at 10:38 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, history of urinary tract infections (UTIs), urethral stricture (narrowing of the urethra), and obstructive and reflux uropathy (disorders of the bladder causing problems with urine flow). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/22/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired and had an indwelling urinary catheter. The current February 2025 Care Plans indicated the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. An intervention indicated to monitor and document intake and output. The current February 2025 Physician Order Summary indicated monitor Foley catheter output every shift. If output was less than 300 milliliters (ml), notify the physician. The Medication Administration Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor weekly weights and document nutritional intake for fluids, meals, and supplements as ordered for residents with significant weight loss for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Residents 75, 85 and C) Findings include: 1. Resident 75's record was reviewed on 2/18/25 at 10:55 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, spinal stenosis, iron deficiency anemia and atrial fibrillation. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff assist for toileting and bed mobility. He had a weight loss of 5% or more in a month or 10% or more in 6 months and was not on a physician-prescribed weight loss regimen. The resident's admission weight on 8/8/24 was 324.4 pounds. The resident's weight on 11/5/24 was 293.6 pounds and on 2/5/25, was 246.5 pounds. This was a weight loss of 30.8 pounds, a 24% change, in six months. A Physician's Order, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide proper feeding tube (gastrostomy tube) (g-tube) care as per professional standards, related to a lack of documentation of tube feeding administration for a resident with a history of weight loss for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for tube feeding. (Resident 47) Finding includes: Resident 47's record was reviewed on 2/20/25 at 8:32 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/7/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. She had a feeding tube and was receiving hospice care. The current Care Plans indicated the resident was as risk for dehydration related to the g-tube use. Interventions included, but were not limited to, administer all tube feedings and fluids via g-tube per order. The resident had a g-tube related to dysphagia after a stroke. Interventions included, but were not limited to, registered dietician (RD) to evaluate quarterly and as needed and tube feedings per order. The resident had a potential nutritional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary care and treatment related to incorrect oxygen flow rates and not monitoring an oxygen level for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Residents 75 and 74) Findings include: 1. On 2/17/25 at 11:12 a.m. and 2/18/25 at 2:58 p.m., Resident 75 was observed lying in his bed with his nasal cannula in place and oxygen flowing at a rate of 3 liters per minute (lpm). Resident 75's record was reviewed on 2/18/25 at 10:55 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, spinal stenosis, iron deficiency anemia and atrial fibrillation. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff assist for toileting and bed mobility. A Physician's Order, dated 11/5/24, indicated to administer oxygen at 2 lpm continuously. On 2/19/25 at 10:05 a.m., the resident was observed with LPN 2. The nurse indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure routine and emergency drugs were received in a timely manner and procedures for accurate dispensing were provided for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Residents 32 and 77) Findings include: 1. On 2/17/25 at 2:00 p.m., Resident 32 was observed seated in her recliner in her room. She indicated she had an itching rash on both arms and her left leg for about a week. She had requested to see the Nurse Practitioner. The resident's record was reviewed on 2/20/25 at 1:30 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus, asthma and colostomy. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 1/25/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and was independent for toileting, transfers, bed mobility and eating. A Physician's Progress Note, dated 2/18/25, indicated the resident was seen that day for a complaint of itching. She had about five red patches to her upper arms and left leg. An order was given for triamcinolone cream twice daily for 14 days to the affected areas. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to giving narcotic pain medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 75) Finding includes: Resident 75's record was reviewed on 2/18/25 at 10:55 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, spinal stenosis, iron deficiency anemia and atrial fibrillation. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff assist for toileting and bed mobility. The resident had pain that occurred almost constantly, did not receive prn (as needed) pain medication or non-medication interventions for pain. A Pain Care Plan, dated 8/8/24, indicated the resident had chronic pain due to spinal stenosis. Interventions included, but were not limited to, encourage resident to try different pain-relieving methods such as positioning, relaxation therapy, progressive relaxation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control guidelines were in place and implemented related to improper personal protective equipment (PPE) worn in an isolation room and lack of signage in place for a room on contact isolation. (Residents D and B) Findings include: 1. On 2/19/25 at 3:34 p.m., LPN 1 was observed giving medications by g-tube to Resident D. She donned a pair of gloves, assessed the g-tube for placement and checked residual. She then administered the medication dissolved in water into the g-tube. There was a sign on the resident's door that indicated Enhanced Barrier Precautions should be used. Everyone that entered the room should wash hands before entering and when leaving. Staff must also: Wear gloves and a gown for the following high-contact resident care activities. Activities included, but were not limited to, device care or use: central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy. During an interview on 2/19/25, immediately after the observation, the LPN indicated the resident wasn't on isolation any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a controlled substance was double locked at all times for 1 of 2 medication rooms observed (Grace Point). This had the potential to affect the residents on Grace Point who had the ability to access the storage room. Finding includes: On 12/18/24 at 10:45 a.m., the Grace Point Medication Room was observed with LPN 1. Inside the unlocked refrigerator was a clear tackle box. The box was not locked. Inside the box was 2 medication cards of Dronabinol (Marinol) pills. Interview with LPN 1 at that time, indicated the clear box key was lost and the box should be locked. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 10:48 a.m., LPN 1 indicated the box should be locked and they lost they keys to the box. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 11:45 a.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing indicated the box should be lock at all times and she would locate the key to ensure the narcotic box was locked and stored correctly. A current facility policy, titled, Medication, Ordering, Receiving, and Storage, indicated, .4. Controlled substances will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a resident's physician and responsible party in a timely manner related to abnormal laboratory results for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for change in condition (Resident F). Finding includes: Resident F's record was reviewed on 12/17/24 at at 9:42 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, colostomy status, iron deficiency anemia, and congestive heart failure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/12/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired for daily decision making. He was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living including, but not limited to, hygiene, toileting, and transfers. The resident had an ostomy and required oxygen therapy. A Nurses' Note, dated 8/30/24 at 9:23 a.m., indicated the resident had audible crackles in the lungs with no improvement after nebulizer treatments were administered per orders. A Nurses' Note, dated 8/30/24 at 3:43 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary care and services related to a lack of orders or monitoring in place for a neck collar, a delay in treatment after notification of critical laboratory results, medications not administered as ordered by the Physician, lack of assessment or monitoring of a new skin condition, and labs not completed as ordered by the Physician for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for change of condition. (Residents M and F) Findings include: 1. On 12/18/24 at 12:05 p.m., Resident M was observed lying in bed in her room. She had a soft neck collar in place around her neck. During an interview with the resident's family at that time, they indicated the resident recently had neck surgery which was why she was wearing the neck collar. On 12/19/24 at 11:13 a.m., Resident M was observed lying in bed in her room. She had a soft neck collar in place around her neck. Record review for Resident M was completed on 12/18/24 at 2:11 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fusion of the spine,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an x-ray was completed as ordered by the Physician in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for change in condition. (Resident M) Finding includes: On 12/18/24 at 12:05 p.m., Resident M was observed lying in bed in her room. She had a soft neck collar in place around her neck. During an interview with the resident's family at that time, they indicated the resident recently had neck surgery which was why she was wearing the neck collar. She was supposed to have a neck x-ray done last week to compare with the previous x-ray, but it was not completed until this week and they were unsure why there was a delay. Record review for Resident M was completed on 12/18/24 at 2:11 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fusion of the spine, osteomyelitis of the vertebra, and neoplasm of the spinal cord. A Nursing Note, dated 12/10/24 at 8:51 p.m., indicated a new order was received from the resident's surgeon for an x-ray of the cervical spine. The Nurse Practitioner was made aware. The order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's privacy was respected, related to RN 2 using her private cell phone to take pictures of bruising on the left arm and left breast of a cognitively impaired resident (Resident B) without the approval of the resident's Responsible Party, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for privacy. See F609 for additional information regarding Resident B. Finding includes: Resident B's record was reviewed on 9/5/24 at 9:47 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 6/22/24, indicated a moderately impaired cognitive status. A Nurse's Progress Note, dated 8/24/24 at 5:46 a.m. and signed by RN 2, indicated a large bruised area was observed on the left breast and left upper arm and the left ankle was slightly swollen. The resident complained of pain with movement of the ankle and was unable to remember how she received the bruises. Cross reference F609. During an interview on 9/5/24 at 1:16 p.m., RN 1 indicated the bruising of the left arm and breast…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown source was immediately reported to the Administrator/Abuse Coordinator and the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) and failed to ensure the injury was investigated/assessed thoroughly for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for injuries and abuse. (Resident B) Finding includes: During an observation on 9/5/24 at 1:50 p.m., CNA 1 lifted up Resident B's shirt and removed her left arm from the sleeve of the shirt. There was a fading purplish/red bruised area from the underarm to the elbow, approximately 20 centimeters (cm) by 13 cm. The entire side and underneath the left breast had a purple bruise. CNA 1 indicated she was unsure how the injury occurred. The resident was unable to recall how the bruise occurred. Resident B's record was reviewed on 9/5/24 at 9:47 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 6/22/24, indicated a moderately impaired cognitive status, no behaviors, no impaired movements of the upper and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required respiratory care received care consistent with profession standards and was administered oxygen as ordered by the physician, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident E) Finding includes: During an observation on 9/5/24 at 9:38 a.m., LPN 8 responded to an activated call light activated by Resident F. Resident F indicated Resident E's oxygen concentrator was alarming and it was driving him crazy. LPN 8 indicated she needed to administer medications then she would take care of the concentrator, said she would be back, then left the room. During an observation on 9/5/24 at 9:42 a.m., Resident E was lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated. A nasal cannula for the oxygen was in place. The oxygen concentrator was alarming and a lit picture of a wrench was flashing on the concentrator. The concentrator was set at less than 0.5 liters per minute. During an interview on 9/5/24 at 9:59 a.m., Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse 9 indicated she was unsure what the wrench…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the potential of transmission of communicable diseases and infections, related to glucometers (blood sugar monitor) used for multiple residents not sanitized before and after each resident use (RN 8) and failed to sanitize an oximeter (oxygen saturation monitor) used for multiple residents after it was used on a resident. (Resident B, LPN 4) This had the potential to affect the 26 residents in the facility who receive glucometer testing and the 25 residents who reside on [NAME] C Hall. The facility also failed to ensure staff were educated on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), ensure staff were aware of which residents were on EBP, and correct Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was used by staff members (CNA 5, CNA 6, CNA 7). This had the potential to affect the 96 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: 1. During an observation of the Gracepoint Unit on 8/13/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify a resident's physician and responsible party in a timely manner, related to a gastrostomy (g-tube, feeding tube) mechanical malfunction requiring hospital intervention, which resulted in medications and flushes not being given as ordered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for physician and family notifications. (Resident B) See F693 for additional information on Resident B. Finding includes: During an observation on 8/13/24 at 5:24 a.m., the resident was lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated. A liquid tube feeding of Osmolyte 1.5 was infusing at 72 cc (cubic centimeters) per hour. During an observation on 8/13/24 at 11:45 a.m., the resident's tube feeding was turned off. Resident B's record was reviewed on 8/13/24 at 10:31 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, gastrostomy, and iron deficiency anemia. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/15/24, indicated a feeding tube was present, the resident received 51% or more calories from the feeding tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL's) received bathing/showers at least twice a week for 2 of 3 dependent residents who were reviewed for ADL's. (Residents B and H) Findings include: 1. Resident B's record was reviewed on 8/13/24 at 10:31 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, gastrostomy tube, and iron deficiency anemia. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/15/24, indicated and short and long term memory problem, had no behaviors, and was dependent for ADL's. Shower and bathing status was marked as not assessed. A Care Plan, dated 5/10/23, indicated a self-care performance deficit and all ADL needs would be met. The Shower Schedule, located in the Shower Sheets Binder, indicated the resident was to be bathed/showered on Mondays and Thursdays. The Shower Sheets in the binder indicated bathing had occurred on 7/22/24 and 7/29/24. During an interview on 8/13/24 1:33 p.m., CNA 2 indicated the bathing was documented either on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary care and services related to medications not administered as ordered by the Physician, for 2 of 15 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Residents B and D) Finding includes: 1. Resident B's record was reviewed on 8/13/24 at 10:31 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, gastrostomy, and iron deficiency anemia. A Care Plan, dated 6/9/23, indicated a diagnosis of anemia. The interventions included the medications would be administered as ordered and laboratory testing would be completed as ordered. The complete blood count laboratory results on 5/10/24 indicated red blood cells (RBC) level was 3.88 (normal 4.7-6.10) and hemoglobin (HGB) was 11.4 (normal 14-18). On 7/15/24, the RBC was 3.46 and HGB 10.5. On 7/31/24, the RBC was 3.24 and HGB 9.7, and on 8/5/24, the RBC was 3.14 and HGB 9.3. The Physician's Orders, dated 6/13/23, indicated five cc's (cubic centimeters) of a liquid multi-vitamin was to be administered daily and seven cc's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide proper feeding tube (gastrostomy tube) (g-tube) care as per professional standards, related to water flushes not completed as ordered, verification of the g-tube placement not completed prior to medication administration, failure to flush the g-tube after each medication was administered, a liquid feeding bag not labeled, dated or timed, and a piston syringe (used for water flushing and other care for the g-tube) not changed daily, for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for feeding tube care. (Residents B and J) See F580 for additional information on Resident B Findings include: 1. Resident B's record was reviewed on 8/13/24 at 10:31 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, gastrostomy, and iron deficiency anemia. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/15/24, indicated feeding tube was present, he received 51% or more calories from the feeding tube and 501 cc's (cubic centimeters) or more of fluids from the feeding tube. A Care Plan, dated 5/15/24, indicated a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required nebulizer breathing treatments was assessed prior to, during, and/or after the treatment for effectiveness of the treatment, lung sounds, pulse, oxygen status, and blood pressure status for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for oxygen therapy. (Resident B) Finding includes; Resident B's record was reviewed on 8/13/24 at 10:31 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, gastrostomy, and iron deficiency anemia. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/15/24, indicated a short and long term memory problem, had no behaviors, was dependent for activities of daily living and oxygen was administered. A Care Plan, dated 5/13/24, indicated the resident required oxygen therapy. The interventions included, the medications would be administered as ordered. A Physician's Order, dated 7/5/24, indicated a nebulizer treatment of ipratropium-albuterol (breathing medication) inhalation solution 0.5-2.5 mg (milligrams) per 3 cc's (cubic centimeters) was to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received the necessary ADL (activities of daily living) care, related to lack of documentation of incontinence care for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Residents F, G, and H) Findings include: 1. Resident F's record was reviewed on 5/8/24 at 9:00 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to Alzheimer's disease, gastrostomy and colostomy status, and traumatic brain injury. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/9/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired for daily decision making. He was dependent on staff for ADL care including, but not limited to, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, and personal hygiene. A Care Plan, dated 5/10/23, indicated the resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit. Interventions included, but were not limited to, the resident required total assistance for toileting and colostomy care. A Care Plan, dated 5/18/23, indicated the resident was incontinent of bladder. Interventions included, but were not limited to, check…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed related to an incorrect amount of enteral feeding documented and incomplete meal consumption logs for residents with a history of weight loss for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Residents F, G, and H) Findings include: 1. Resident F's record was reviewed on 5/8/24 at 9:00 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to Alzheimer's disease, gastrostomy and colostomy status, and traumatic brain injury. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/9/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired for daily decision making. He had a feeding tube. He received 51% or more of his total calories and 501 cc per day or more fluids through the feeding tube. A Care Plan, dated 6/7/23, indicated the resident required a tube feeding. Interventions included, but were not limited to, feed via tube feed pump per Physician's order. A Physician's Order, dated 8/9/23, indicated Osmolite 1.5 at 72 milliliter per hour for 20 hours, on at 1:00 p.m. and off at 9:00 a.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored under sanitary conditions, related to unlabeled and undated food and beverages, and a scoop stored in the dry food storage bin, for 2 of 4 refrigerators reviewed (Main Kitchen), as well as unlabeled and undated staff beverages in 1 of 2 unit refrigerators (Grace Point 2 Unit) observed. This had the potential to affect 103 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings include: 1. During the initial tour of the kitchen, with Chef 1 on 3/18/24 at 9:12 a.m., the following observations were made: a. There was an unlabeled and undated beverage in the dessert refrigerator. b. There was an unlabeled and undated pan of rice in the cook's refrigerator. c. In the dry storage room, there was a scoop stored in the rice bin. During an interview, on 3/18/24 at 9:15 a.m., Chef 1 indicated food and drinks should be labeled and dated and there should not be scoops stored in the bins. 2. During an observation of the Grace Point 2 Unit refrigerator, with LPN 4 on 3/21/24 at 2:55 p.m., there were unlabeled and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had Physician's Orders for medications and an assessment to self-administer their own medications, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Residents 35 and 101) Findings include: 1. On 3/18/24 at 2:13 p.m., a Breo Ellipta inhaler (asthma treatment) and an albuterol inhaler (asthma treatment) were both observed on Resident 35's bedside table. The resident indicated she administered the Breo Ellipta inhaler every morning and the albuterol inhaler only when she needed it. On 3/19/24 at 10:30 a.m., a Breo Ellipta inhaler (asthma treatment) and an albuterol inhaler (asthma treatment) were both observed on Resident 35's bedside table. Resident 35's record was reviewed on 3/21/24 at 8:55 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, asthma and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/23/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. A Physician's Order, dated 2/17/24, indicated Breo Ellipta…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to privacy, related to facility staff opening a resident's personal mail, for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for residents' rights. (Resident 35). Finding includes: During an interview on 3/19/24 at 9:14 a.m., Resident 35 indicated within the last week, she had ordered a new debit card. She had received a notification on her cell phone that indicated her card was going to be delivered to the facility soon. She had gone to see the Business Office Manager (BOM) upstairs regarding another matter, and asked if she had received any mail addressed to her. The BOM indicated she had received a letter the day before, and gave the letter to the resident. The letter had already been opened by the BOM. Resident 35 indicated she had never received a call from the BOM indicating the letter had arrived the day before. In the meantime, Resident 35 had canceled the card because she was afraid it had been lost, and now had to wait for another card to be delivered. Resident 35's record was reviewed on 3/21/24 at 8:55 a.m. The Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received the necessary ADL (activities of daily living) care, related to unshaven facial hair, lack of incontinence care, and long fingernails, for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Residents 17, B, and 27) Findings include: 1. On 3/18/24 at 10:13 a.m., Resident 17 was observed in bed. She had long facial hair on her chin. On 3/19/24 at 1:26 p.m., the resident was again observed in bed, with long facial hair on her chin. She indicated she did not like the facial hair and the staff would sometimes shave her. Resident 17's record was reviewed on 3/19/24 at 1:50 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, atherosclerotic heart disease, lymphedema and low back pain. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/4/24, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive staff assistance for bed mobility and transfers. The current ADL Care Plan indicated the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary care and treatment, related to compression stockings not in place as ordered, a non-pressure skin treatment not completed as ordered, and a fall assessment not completed, for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for edema, 1 of 2 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions, and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for falls. (Residents 64, 52 & 27) Findings include: 1. On 3/18/24 at 1:14 p.m., Resident 64 was observed seated in her Broda chair near the Nurses' Station. She was fully dressed with regular socks and tennis shoes on her feet. There were no compression stockings on her legs. On 3/19/24 at 9:30 a.m., the resident was in her room seated. There were no compression stockings on her legs. A family member was present in the room and indicated she frequently did not have them on. Staff said she would take them off, but she wasn't able to do so herself. On 3/19/24 at 1:25 p.m., the resident was observed again…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer care was provided as ordered and a pressure ulcer was correctly assessed, for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Residents 49 and B) Findings include: 1. On 3/20/24 at 1:26 p.m., Resident 49's wound care was observed with LPN 4. The LPN removed a Flagyl (antibiotic) 500 milligram (mg) tablet from the cart, crushed it and poured it into a medicine cup. She gathered additional supplies, then indicated she had not seen the wound before and did not know if there were one or two areas. She removed another Flagyl 500 mg tablet, crushed it and poured it into the same medicine cup. The resident was positioned on her side. The old dressing was removed from her sacral area. There was a full thickness wound with reddened edges, approximately 10 centimeters (cm) wide by 10 cm long. The area was cleansed with normal saline and gauze. The nurse then sprinkled all the crushed Flagyl over the area, applied calcium alginate and covered with a dry dressing. Resident 49's record was reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete meal consumption logs for a resident with a history of weight loss, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 78) Finding includes: On 3/19/24 at 9:45 a.m., Resident 78 was observed in the dining area eating breakfast, but falling asleep during breakfast time. The resident ate about 40% of her breakfast. The resident picked up a small piece of food and put it in her mouth, then fell asleep. The resident's breakfast tray was removed from in front of the resident. On 03/21/24 at 9:21 a.m., Resident 78 was asleep in bed. The resident's breakfast tray was on the food cart in the hallway and was untouched by the resident. Breakfast service time was at 7:00 a.m. The record for Resident 78 was reviewed on 3/18/24 at 9:39 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were limited to, unspecific dementia, behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. The 1/25/24 State Optional Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident required supervision and set up help for eating.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices and standards were maintained, related to staff touching pills during medication administration, for 2 of 5 residents observed during the medication administration observation, and lack of hand hygiene during wound care, for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Residents 67, 47, and 27) Finding includes: 1. On 3/19/24 at 9:57 a.m., LPN 1 was observed preparing Resident 67's medications. She opened the pre-packaged medication pouch and poured the pills in to her hand, then placed them in a medicine cup. She then administered the medications. During an interview with LPN 1 at that time, she indicated she wasn't aware she was touching the pills and was not aware she shouldn't touch the medications with her hands. During an interview, on 3/19/24 at 10:15 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the nurse should not have been putting the pills in her hand and then administering them. 2. On 3/20/24 at 8:59 a.m., QMA 1 was observed preparing Resident 47's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure agency staff were provided adequate orientation to the facility and residents care needs, related to Agency CNA 1 delivering a meal tray to a resident who was NPO (nothing by mouth), for a random observation on the 200 C hall. This had the potential to affect 3 residents residing in the facility who were NPO. Finding includes: On 3/21/24 at 11:48 a.m., Agency CNA 1 was observed delivering Resident C's lunch tray. She placed Resident C's tray on Resident B's bedside table and exited the room. Resident B was observed sitting in his bed with his eyes open. On 3/21/24 at 11:51 a.m., CNA 1 entered Resident B's room, picked up Resident C's tray from Resident B's bedside table and proceeded to assist Resident C with his lunch. Resident B's record was reviewed on 3/21/24 at 10:32 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, pressure ulcer of left heel, colostomy status, and benign prostatic hyperplasia (an enlarged prostate). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/8/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required minimal assistance with showers received bathing at least twice a week, for 1 of 1 resident who required minimal assistance with bathing. (Resident BB) Finding includes: During an interview on 1/31/24 9:16 a.m., Resident BB indicated her showers were scheduled on Wednesdays and Saturday days. She had not had a shower in over a week and does not always receive her showers. Resident B's record was reviewed on 1/31/24 at 10:24 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus. An Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 10/24/23, indicated an intact cognitive status, no behaviors, independent for toileting, hygiene, mobility, and walking. Shower status was not assessed. A Care Plan, dated 9/8/21, indicated self performance for activities of daily living fluctuates. The interventions indicated she preferred her shower in the morning. The Shower Task Form indicated a shower was received on 1/20/24 and 1/27/24. A bed bath was received on 1/24/24. There was no documentation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who required extensive to dependent assistance for activities of daily living (ADL's), received bathing/showers at least twice a week, for 2 of 2 residents who require extensive to dependent assistance for ADL's. (Residents DD and EE) Findings include: 1) Resident DD's record was reviewed on 1/31/24 at 11:32 a.m. the diagnoses included, but were not limited to stroke. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/21/23, indicated a moderately impaired cognitive status, no behaviors, dependent for ADL's, bed mobility, and transfers. A Care Plan, dated 1/11/24, indicated assistance was required for ADL's. The interventions included she was totally dependent for bathing, preferred bed baths, and did not have a time preference for her bathing. The shower/bathing schedule indicated bathing was on Mondays and Thursdays on the evening shift. There was no documentation that indicated showers/bathing had been completed in January. The bathing was documented as completed on 11/2/23, 11/13/23, 12/21/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received medical records within 48 hours of request for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for medical record requests. (Residents H and J) Findings include: Requests for medical records were reviewed on 10/26/23 at 1:57 p.m. 1. Resident H requested his medical records on 9/25/23. The request was stamped as received by medical records on 9/25/23. The medical records were made available and released to the resident on 10/19/23. 2. Resident J requested his medical records on 8/4/23. The request was stamped as received by medical records on 8/9/23. The medical records were made available and released to the resident on 8/17/23. The current policy, Medical Record Request, indicated, .It is our policy to fulfill requests for uses and disclosures of protected health information within 30 days of receipt of a valid Authorization of Release of Medical Information Form Interview with the Medical Records Director on 10/26/23, indicated she had been on vacation when Resident J's request had been made, that was why the delay…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$25,665 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $25,665 — penalty dated 2025-07-24
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-08-16 for 9 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-04-04 for 13 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CASA CONSULTING — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JACKSON COUNTY SCHNECK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/01/2013 |
| BEVERS, SUSAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| FISH, ERIC | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| GILLILAND, TERRENCE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2012 |
| HARPE, BRANDON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| KLEBER, COURTNEY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| MANN, DEBORAH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 02/10/2014 |
| MARKEL, ANDREW | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| MCCORY, JACK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2012 |
| REEDY, MATTHEW | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2012 |
| SMITH, RICK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2012 |
| STOREY, MARC | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| CROWN POINT HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| BIEL, NATALIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/03/2025 |
| BOLER, ALISHA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/09/2024 |
| DELINIA, LYSETTE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| FINEMAN, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/19/2024 |
| MOSTROG, KEITH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/10/2024 |
| SIEGAL, MOSHE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| TEODORI, KRISTINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2017 |
| WHITE JONES, TAMARA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2023 |
| KESSER PROPERTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/25/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 42 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155637. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.