Dyer Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
601 Sheffield Ave, Dyer, IN 46311 · For profit - Corporation · 161 certified beds · (219) 322-2273 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (75) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $23,257 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-05)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.5% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.6% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 33.6% | 25.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.1% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.9% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.4% | 23.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.8% | 95.4% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.6% | 3.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.6% | 23.3% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 22.3% | 13.6% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 72.1% | 79.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.0% | 22.2% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.3% | 10.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.67 | 1.61 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.39 | 1.44 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 42.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.5%CMS range 33.7–62.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.6–13.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 42.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 44.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 35.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 72.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.3–13.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.14 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 161 beds and averages 131.1 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
75 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 63 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure effective services were provided to a dependent resident at risk to develop pressure injuries, and Resident C developed a facility-acquired pressure injury on the sacrum that deteriorated and exhibited signs and symptoms of infection for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. This deficient practice resulted in Resident C experiencing a significant change in condition that required hospitalization for wound-related septic shock and surgical debridement of the wound. The immediate jeopardy began on 3/9/24, when the sacral area was found and not thoroughly assessed. Treatment and further interventions for prevention and healing of the DTI were not initiated. The Administrator, Director of Nursing, and the Nurse Consultant were notified of the immediate jeopardy at 4/5/24 at 9:34. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 4/5/24, and the deficient practice corrected on 3/18/24, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore Past…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to Resident B during a sit to stand mechanical lift transfer. Resident B required two staff assistance with transfers and was transferred with one CNA and not placed in the correct position on the bed and slid out of the sit to stand transfer sling with her right arm caught in the sling, onto the floor. This resulted in a fracture of the right humeral neck (shoulder). The facility also failed to ensure a fall prevention intervention was in place, related to a call light not with in reach for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Residents B and F) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 4/1/24 at 8:52 a.m., Resident B was lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated. She indicated she was lowered to the floor after she slid out of a sling when she was being transferred to bed. She indicated there was only one staff member who assisted her with the transfer. Resident B's record was reviewed on 4/3/24 at 8:48 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were completed for dependent residents related to assistance with shaving, hair washing, checking for incontinence, oral care, nail care and providing assistance with eating for 14 of 16 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Residents F, G, B, P, Q, R, S, T, N, J, K, H, L, and M) Findings include:1. On 5/27/26 at 9:46 a.m., Resident F was observed with a growth of facial hair. During an interview at that time, the resident indicated he wanted to be shaved. On 5/27/26 at 2:56 p.m., the resident's facial hair remained. On 5/28/26 at 9:06 a.m., 11:14 a.m., and 1:45 p.m., the resident's facial hair remained. During an interview on 5/28/26 at 1:45 p.m., the resident indicated he was still waiting to be shaved. The record for Resident F was reviewed on 5/28/26 at 2:57 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke and lack of coordination. A Care Plan, dated 8/8/25 and reviewed on 5/1/26, indicated the resident required assistance with ADLs (activities of daily living)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided related to dining and diet orders for 6 of 6 residents reviewed for accident hazards. (Residents V, D, C, T, U, and E) Findings include:1. On 5/31/26 at 8:11 a.m., Resident V was observed in the East dining room eating her breakfast in front of two other residents. There were no staff members in the dining room while the resident ate her breakfast. The resident ate all of her meal with no staff supervision. The record for Resident V was reviewed on 6/3/26 at 3:45 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's, schizophrenia, and dementia with behavior disturbance. The 4/22/26 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively impaired for daily decision making and required set up or clean up assist with eating. The resident was also identified as having a weight loss. A Care Plan, reviewed on 4/22/26, indicated the resident was at risk for malnutrition. Interventions included, but were not limited to, provide supervision…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents who were admitted with or re-admitted with pressure ulcers received a timely assessment and treatment orders for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Residents C and N) Findings include: 1. On 6/3/26 at 10:29 a.m., the Interim Wound Care Nurse was observed completing treatments to Resident C's right foot, right heel, and sacrum. There was an area of dark skin to the resident's right heel. During an interview at the time, the Interim Wound Nurse indicated the resident's foot and heel were getting better and that the resident was seen weekly by the Wound Physician. The record for Resident C was reviewed on 6/2/26 at 11:05 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's, type two diabetes, stroke, and hemiparesis/hemiplegia (muscle weakness and paralysis) following a stroke affecting the left non-dominant side. The 3/17/26 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete post dialysis vital signs and had no documented assessments of dialysis access site for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dialysis. (Resident C)Finding Included:Resident C's record was reviewed on 3/2/26 at 2:00 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, end stage renal disease (renal failure), diabetes, and dependent on renal dialysis.The 1/22/26 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident had impairment on both sides of the lower extremities and was on dialysis.A Care Plan, dated 6/4/24 and revised on 2/25/26, indicated the resident required dialysis related to renal failure. Interventions included, but were not limited to, assess dialysis access site for redness, swelling, pain, or drainage, and encourage resident to attend scheduled dialysis appointments. A Physician's Order, dated 12/19/25, indicated to record vital signs pre-dialysis and post-dialysis.A Physician's Order, dated 3/2/26, indicated to assess…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed ensure residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL's) received bathing at least twice a week and failed to ensure a resident received incontinence care timely, for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for ADL assistance. (Residents C, B, and D)Findings include:1. During an observation on 1/21/26 at 10:12 a.m., Resident C was lying in bed, the bed sheet was not covering the resident, and the incontinence brief was visible and was observed to be saturated with urine. She indicated she was waiting to be cleaned up. The resident's call light had not been activated and when asked, she indicated she thought it was on. The call light was then activated by the resident at 10:13 a.m. RN 1 entered the room at 10:15 a.m. and the resident indicated she needed her incontinence brief changed. RN 1 turned the call light off and indicated the CNA assigned to her would be notified and then left the room. The resident was interviewed while she waited for staff to return and indicated she received bathing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, related to blood sugars not completed and medications not administered as ordered by a physician, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care and receiving medications as ordered. (Resident G)Finding includes:Resident G's record was reviewed on 1/22/26 at 10:01 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and diabetes mellitus.A Care Plan, dated 2/4/25, indicated the resident had diabetes mellitus. The interventions indicated medication would be administered as ordered.A Care Plan, dated 10/29/25, indicated the resident refused medication. the interventions indicated medications would be crushed as needed and/or when she expresses unable to swallow the medication. The reason for the medication would be explained to the resident.An Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 11/5/25, indicated a severely impaired cognitive status and received insulin and an antipsychotic medications.A Physician's Order,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a urinalysis (UA) with culture and sensitivity (C&S) laboratory test was completed as ordered for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for laboratory testing. (Resident C) Finding includes:During an interview on 1/21/26 at 10:15 a.m., Resident C indicated she has had urinary tract infections and that she has burning with voiding for a while. She indicated they had tried different medications and they could not get rid of the infection.Resident C's record was reviewed on 1/21/26 at 3:06 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic kidney disease, history of urinary tract infections, and diabetes mellitus.A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/20/25, indicated an intact cognitive status, was dependent on staff for bathing and toileting, required maximum assistance with bed mobility, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder.A Care Plan, last reviewed on 12/15/25, indicated enhanced barrier precautions were required related to a multi-drug resistant organism urinary tract infection. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to establish and/or maintain a system that accounted for, periodically reconciled, and ensured the disposition of all controlled drugs, related to lack of documentation of narcotic medication administration for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for misappropriation of property. (Resident M) Finding includes: A Facility Reported Incident (FRI), dated 8/8/25 at 5:01 p.m., indicated an employee was unable to locate scheduled analgesic medication for Resident M. The search was initiated, and the facility was unable to locate the medication. The facility administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Medical Director, and the resident's responsible party were notified. The resident was assessed and as needed Tylenol was given for pain management. The follow-up indicated that the employee was unable to locate the scheduled analgesic medication for Resident M. A search of all medication carts and medication rooms was initiated. The facility was unable to locate Resident M's medication. A full house narcotic count was conducted at this time. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's blood pressure was monitored per Physician's Orders, for a resident who was receiving multiple medications for hypertension. (Resident B)Finding includes:Resident B's record was reviewed on 11/24/25 at 9:56 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertensive heart disease and chronic kidney disease.The following Physician's Orders indicated medications that affect the blood pressure:8/20/25, spironolactone (anti-hypertensive/heart failure medication) 50 milligrams (mg) daily.8/29/25, midodrine (treatment of orthostatic hypotension) 5 mg three times a day for major side effect systolic supine hypertension.8/29/25, a Physician's Order indicated vital signs were to be checked every shift.9/2/25, metoprolol tartrate (beta-blocker to treat hypertension) 25 mg twice a day.9/4/25, bumetanide (diuretic) 1 mg twice a day.The Medication Administration Record, dated 11/2025, indicated the vital signs had not been ochecked every shift as ordered by the physician.During an interview, on 11/25/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure correct Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was used by staff members (CNA 1 and CNA 2) when providing care to residents who were in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and Contact Isolation, for 2 random observations. (Residents E and L) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 11/24/25 at 4:52 a.m., CNA 1 responded to Resident E's call light and the resident indicated she needed her incontinence brief changed. There was a sign on the outside of the entry door that indicated Contact Isolation and EBP precautions were required. CNA 1 completed hand hygiene, applied gloves and prepared the supplies for the care. She indicated she was ready to start the care and was stopped prior to the administration of care. CNA 1 walked to the entry door and observed the sign on the door and then donned a gown. Resident E's record was reviewed on 11/25/25 at 10:32 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus, urinary tract infection (UTI), and Klebsiella Pneumoniae (bacteria). An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 63 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-11 · tag F0777 — isolatedProvide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to report Doppler ultrasound results to the physician in a timely manner resulting in delayed treatment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for notification. (Resident D)Finding includes:Resident D's record was reviewed on 8/11/25 at 1:51 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, aphasia (difficulty speaking), hemiparesis (paralysis on one side of the body, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and weakness.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/12/25, indicated the Resident was severely impaired for daily decision making. The resident required substantial/maximum assistance with shower/bathing, upper body dressing and personal hygiene. The resident required dependent care with lower body dressing and toileting. A Physician's Order, dated 7/29/25, indicated for a Doppler ultrasound (non-invasive imaging technique used to assess blood flow in various parts of the body) to be completed on the right lower extremity due to new onset edema with pain.A Nurse's Note, dated 7/29/25 at 10:35 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was maintained related to food spillage on the clothing and a shirt raised up exposing the resident's back for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident E) Finding includes: During a random observation on 6/18/25 at 9:42 a.m., Resident E was observed sitting in a wheelchair at a table. The resident's shirt was raised up exposing his abdomen, the incontinent brief, and his back and side. There was a wet red stain on the front of the shirt and scrambled eggs were observed on his shorts and lower abdomen. During a random observation on 6/18/25 at 1:15 p.m., the resident was observed sitting in his wheelchair in the main lobby after eating ice cream. There was a white towel over the front of the white shirt. The white shirt was the same one as above and it was still raised up in the back, exposing the resident's sides and back. The red stain was now dried. On 6/18/25 at 1:27 p.m., the resident was observed sitting in his wheelchair in the east unit dining room. The white towel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were completed for dependent residents related to incontinence care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Resident E) Finding includes: During a random observation on 6/18/25 at 9:42 a.m., Resident E was observed sitting in a wheelchair at a table. The resident's shirt was raised up exposing his abdomen, the incontinent brief, and his back and side. There was a wet red stain on the front of the shirt and scrambled eggs were observed on his shorts and lower abdomen. On 6/18/25 at 1:45 p.m., CNA 1 pushed the resident back to his room and was going to lay him down and provide incontinence care. CNA 2 entered the room with the hoyer lift and assisted CNA 1 with the resident as they put him in the bed. CNA 1 indicated at that time, that she had given the resident a shower before breakfast that morning. She then proceeded to remove the resident's shorts and incontinent brief. The brief was heavily soiled with urine and bowel movement and had the remnants of dried scrambled eggs near…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were completed for dependent residents related to assistance with meals, shaving, oral care, and providing showers and nail care for 12 of 14 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Residents E, K, O, B, M, G, F, H, L, N, P, and J) Findings include: 1. On 2/5/25 at 8:05 a.m., Resident E received her breakfast tray. The resident was seated at a table with two other residents. At 8:11 a.m., the resident was asked by a staff member if she was going to eat. The resident picked up her milk and put it back down. At 8:18 a.m., no staff had offered to sit down and feed the resident or assist her with her meal. Staff were observed to be passing coffee and the trays. At 8:25 a.m., a CNA walked over to the resident and handed her a spoon and told her where her fork was. The resident then proceeded to start eating her oatmeal. On 2/6/25 at 11:59 a.m., Resident E was seated at a table in the unit dining room. She had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure insulin was signed out as ordered for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility also failed to ensure treatments for skin excoriation, skin tears, and bruises were ordered and the areas were assessed and monitored for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions, signs and symptoms of edema were addressed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for edema, and no assessment of lung sounds were documented and new orders put into place for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a change in condition. (Residents S, T, R, Q, and F) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident S was reviewed on 2/6/25 at 9:44 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with behavior disturbance and type 2 diabetes. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/22/24, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired for daily decision making and she was receiving insulin injections. A Care Plan, reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents in the memory care unit were supervised during meals and while eating for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for supervision. (Residents 81, R, L, and 6) Findings include: 1. During a random observation on 2/3/25 at 12:03 p.m., there were 4 residents observed in the memory care unit lounge at the end of the hall. All of them were observed with their lunch meal in front of them and eating by themselves with no staff in the room. Resident 81 and Resident R were observed seated at a table by themselves. Resident R was served pork, broccoli, and a baked potato. The baked potato was cut up, however the pork was still whole and not cut into smaller pieces. Resident 81 was observed sitting in a wheelchair next to Resident R. She was served pureed meat, pureed vegetable, pureed potatoes, and a pureed dessert in a separate bowl. She was also served a red beverage and a carton of lactose free milk. At 12:15 p.m., Resident R picked up the carton of lactose free milk, which was Resident 81's milk, and drank it. Again there was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were in place and implemented related to staff failing to disinfect multi-use equipment, perform hand hygiene after glove removal, medications touched with bare hands, hand hygiene not completed after direct resident contact, glucometers not disinfected after use for 1 of 1 glucometer observed, not donning personal protective equipment (PPE) for a resident in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), not containing soiled linen, and the improper storage of personal care equipment during random infection control observations. (Residents 63, 25, 83, 72, and 10 ) Findings include: 1. On 2/4/25 at 9:13 a.m., CNA 4 and CNA 5 were observed in Resident 63's room preparing to transfer her via a Hoyer lift (a mechanical lift). At 9:25 a.m., the CNAs donned gloves without hand sanitizing and transferred the resident via the Hoyer lift. After transferring the resident, the CNAs removed their gloves and CNA 5 placed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's dignity was maintained related to wearing a hospital gown while in bed during the day for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident 72) Finding includes: On 2/3/25 at 11:49 a.m. and 2:12 p.m., Resident 72 was observed in her room in bed. The resident was wearing a hospital gown at both times. On 2/4/25 at 10:23 a.m., the resident was again observed in her room in bed wearing a hospital gown. On 2/5/25 at 9:27 a.m., 10:54 a.m., and 1:49 p.m., the resident was observed in her room in bed wearing a hospital gown. On 2/6/25 at 9:25 a.m., 10:25 a.m., 11:40 a.m., and 3:27 p.m., the resident was again observed in her room in bed wearing a hospital gown. On 2/7/25 at 5:45 a.m., AM care was provided to the resident. The resident was dressed in a clean hospital gown. The record for Resident 72 was reviewed on 2/6/25 at 10:54 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia without behavior disturbance, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and gastrostomy status (a tube surgically…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to self-administer medications and oxygen therapy and had physician's orders to self-administer for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Residents 91, 105 and 30) Findings include: 1. During a random observation on 2/3/25 at 2:15 p.m., there was an Albuterol hand held inhaler observed on Resident 91's over bed table. The resident was not in her room at that time. During random observations on 2/4/25 at 9:39 a.m. and 11:25 a.m., the resident was observed in bed. At those times, the Albuterol inhaler was observed on the over bed table. During an interview on 2/4/25 at 9:40 a.m., the resident indicated she brought the inhaler from home and used it almost every day. The record for Resident 91 was reviewed on 2/4/25 at 10:00 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, type 2 diabetes, and dyspnea (difficulty breathing) The 12/21/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a PASARR (preadmission screening and resident review) was completed when a new mental health diagnoses was added for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PASARR. (Resident 124) Finding includes: The record for Resident 124 was reviewed on 2/7/25 at 10:32 a.m. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy, dementia, and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. A PASARR level I, dated 1/10/25, indicated further screening was not needed unless the resident had a serious mental illness or intellectual development disability. The diagnosis of unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition was added to the resident's record on 1/13/25. There was no PASARR level 2 performed. During an interview on 2/4/25 at 1:44 p.m., the Social Services Director indicated they did not do a level 2 PASARR, but she would re-do the level 1. She thought the resident had the diagnosis of psychosis since a prior hospitalization, but she was not sure. The PASARR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a plan of care that was individualized to the needs of a bilateral amputee for 1 of 27 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident P) Finding includes: During a random observation on 2/3/25 at 3:37 p.m., Resident P was observed to have bilateral below-the-knee amputations. The record for Resident P was reviewed on 2/7/25 at 8:44 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, ESRD (end-stage renal disease), congestive heart failure, diabetes, and stroke. The 11/27/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and required maximum assistance with ADLs. A Care Plan, revised on 2/4/25, indicated the resident was at risk for complications related to diabetes. Approaches included inspecting the resident's feet for open areas, sores, pressure areas, blisters, edema, or redness and referring to a podiatrist to monitor and document foot care needs and cut long nails as needed. During an interview on 2/7/25 at 4:00 p.m., the Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During an interview on 2/3/25 at 3:05 p.m., Resident 30 indicated he was trying to contact his sister to get his lab results because when the facility got the results, they gave them to his sister and not to him. The record for Resident 30 was reviewed on 2/5/25 at 10:09 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), dementia, schizophrenia, and sleep apnea. The 12/1/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident had lab testing completed on 1/28/25, 1/31/25, and 2/3/25. There was no documentation the resident was informed of his lab results. During an interview on 2/7/25 at 1:40 p.m., Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) 2 indicated she documented that she updated the family member because they were the POA (power of attorney), but that she would inform the resident of his results. 3.1-35(c)(1) Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a limited range of motion had a physician-ordered splint in place for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for range of motion. (Resident O) Finding includes: During an observation on 2/3/25 at 2:52 p.m., Resident O was observed sitting in his wheelchair in his room. At that time, his left hand was flaccid and closed and he could not open his hand without assistance. There was no anti-contracture device in his left hand. During random observations on 2/4/25 at 11:02 a.m., 2/5/25 at 7:25 a.m. and 1:56 p.m., on 2/6/25 at 9:28 a.m. and 3:20 p.m., and on 2/7/25 at 11:05 a.m., the resident's left hand was observed flaccid and closed. There was no anti-contracture device in his left hand. The record for Resident O was reviewed on 2/5/25 at 3:06 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke and hemiplegia affecting the left side. The 11/27/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and had a functional range of motion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with meals and nutritional supplement consumption was recorded for residents with a history of weight loss for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Residents R and 81) Findings include: 1. During a random observation on 2/3/25 at 12:03 p.m., Resident R was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the memory care lounge area at a table. The resident's lunch was in front of her. She was served pork, broccoli, and a baked potato. The baked potato was cut up, however the piece of pork was still whole and not cut into smaller pieces. There was no staff in the room to assist the resident and she just stared out of the window. At 12:15 p.m., the resident picked up a carton of lactose free milk, belonging to the resident who was sitting next to her, and drank it. Again, no staff were in the room to assist the resident. At 12:23 p.m., CNA 6 entered the lounge and offered to help the resident eat. The resident had not touched or ate any of her food before the CNA arrived. During a random…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure gastrostomy tube (a tube surgically inserted into the stomach that allows for the delivery of food and medication) placement was checked prior to medication administration, water flushes and medications were instilled via gravity, and documentation of gastrostomy tube care was completed for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for tube feeding. (Residents 72 and K) Findings include: 1. On 2/7/25 at 6:40 a.m., RN 3 was observed preparing a medication for Resident 72. The resident received her medications by the way of a gastrostomy tube. Upon entering the room, the RN donned gloves and placed the cup containing the medication on the over bed table. The RN proceeded to place his stethoscope on the resident's abdomen and listen to her bowel sounds. After listening to the resident's bowel sounds, the RN proceed to flush the resident's gastrostomy tube, he pushed 30 milliliters (mls) of water in via the syringe plunger rather than instilling the water via gravity. He then proceeded to administer the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was at the correct flow rate for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen. (Residents T, G, and 30) Findings include: 1. On 2/3/25 at 11:59 a.m., Resident T was observed in his room in bed. The resident had oxygen in use by the way of a nasal cannula. The oxygen concentrator, which was located in the resident's bathroom, was set at four liters. At 3:18 p.m., the oxygen remained in use at four liters. On 2/4/25 at 10:34 a.m., the resident's oxygen remained in use at four liters per nasal cannula. On 2/5/25 at 9:31 a.m., 11:10 a.m., and 1:53 p.m., the resident remained in his room in bed with oxygen per nasal cannula in use. The resident's oxygen concentrator was set at three liters. On 2/6/25 at 9:30 a.m., 11:58 a.m., and 3:03 p.m., the resident remained in his room in bed with oxygen per nasal cannula in use. The resident's oxygen concentrator was set at three liters. On 2/7/25 at 5:43 a.m., the resident was observed in his bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% for 3 of 8 residents observed during medication pass. Four errors were observed during 34 opportunities for errors during medication administration. This resulted in a medication error rate of 11.7% (Residents 72, 9, and 114) Findings include: 1. On 2/7/25 at 6:58 a.m., RN 3 was observed preparing Resident 72's Lispro insulin. The RN administered 8 units of insulin by the way of an insulin pen for a blood sugar of 362. At 8:34 a.m., RN 2 was observed preparing the resident's Entrapenem (an antibiotic) for an intramuscular (IM) injection (a medical procedure where the medication was injected directly into the muscle). The RN diluted the medication with 3.2 milliliters (mls) of Lidocaine (a medication to numb the skin) and then proceeded to dilute the medication with 10 cc's (cubic centimeters) of normal saline. The RN administered the injection into the right upper arm. The record for Resident 72 was reviewed on 2/7/25 at 10:00 a.m. The resident's diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a controlled substance was double locked at all times for 1 of 2 medication rooms observed. (West Unit) Finding includes: On 2/10/25 at 10:11 a.m., the [NAME] Unit Medication Room was observed with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) 2. Inside the unlocked refrigerator, there was an unlocked white hospice box which contained Morphine Sulfate Roxanol 20 milligrams (mg), a Schedule II controlled substance. During an interview on 2/10/25 at 10:11 a.m., ADON 2 indicated the hospice box should be locked due to the narcotic contents inside. A facility policy, titled Receiving Controlled Substances, indicated, .G Medications listed in Schedules II, III, IV, and V were stored double lock . 3.1-25(m)
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received routine dental services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dental services. (Resident J) Finding includes: During an interview on 2/4/25 at 9:18 a.m., Resident J indicated he wanted to see a dentist for routine dental treatment. The record for Resident J was reviewed on 2/5/25 at 1:54 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dysphasia (difficulty swallowing). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/9/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A signed dental consent, dated 3/28/24, indicated the resident wanted to receive dental services offered by the facility. There was no documentation any dental appointments had been completed for the resident. Documentation provided by the Social Service Director on 2/6/25 at 12:40 p.m., indicated the facility switched to a different dental company in July of 2024. During an interview on 2/6/25 at 12:47 p.m., the Social Service Director indicated the resident did not sign a consent form for the new dental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary care and services related to medications not administered as ordered by the Physician, for 2 of 15 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Residents F and G) Findings include: 1. During a random observation on 9/26/24 at 8:18 a.m., QMA 1 was preparing Resident F's morning medication. She indicated the Vitamin D was not in the medication cart and the medication had been ordered from the Pharmacy on 9/23/24. Resident F's record was reviewed on 9/26/24 at 1:09 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anemia and chronic kidney disease stage three. The admission Physician's Orders, dated 8/13/24, included Vitamin D2 (supplement), 10 micrograms (mcg) (400 Units) every morning and medications were to be initiated upon arrival from the pharmacy. The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 8/2024, indicated the Vitamin D2 10 mcg had been administered at 9:00 a.m. on 8/14/24 through 8/31/24. The MAR, dated 9/2024, indicated the Vitamin D2 10 mcg had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pain was monitored and assessed, medication effectiveness was evaluated and non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to giving pain medication for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for injury of unknown origin. (Resident D) Finding includes: An IDOH (Indiana Department of Health) Facility Reported Incident, dated 8/19/24, indicated Resident D was noted to have pain in the left knee. The nurse assessed the area and observed swelling and left thigh/knee pain. The MD was notified and orders received to obtain an X-ray. The X-ray results indicated a comminuted, displaced left femoral (upper leg) fracture. The resident's record was reviewed on 9/25/24 at 1:30 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cardiomegaly, osteoarthritis of both knees and repeated falls. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 8/30/24, indicated the resident had significant cognitive impairment, and was dependent for toileting and transfer assistance. She received scheduled and prn (as needed) pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's behavior plan of care was implemented related to a resident with dementia who was exhibiting challenging and aggressive behaviors, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident E) Finding includes: An IDOH (Indiana Department of Health) Facility Reported Incident, dated 8/19/24, indicated a CNA had reported that while caring for Resident E during a combative episode, the nurse was rough with the resident. The resident was unable to describe any incident occurred. There was no apparent sign of abuse or deviation in psychosocial well being noted. The follow up report, dated 8/26/24, indicated there were two CNAs in the room during the incident. One had been bending over and unable to see exactly what happened. The other CNA stated that she thought LPN 1 shoved the resident at some point during the event and his hands swiped the resident's ears. The LPN denies being rough with the resident and was trying to assist with care, it was possible his hands bumped the resident's ear as he continued to swing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were thoroughly and accurately documented related to pain medication administration for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for injury of unknown origin. (Resident D) Finding includes: Resident D's record was reviewed on 9/25/24 at 1:30 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cardiomegaly, osteoarthritis of both knees and repeated falls. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 8/30/24, indicated the resident has significant cognitive impairment, and was dependent for toileting and transfer assistance. She received scheduled and prn (as needed) pain medication and showed signs of pain during the assessment period. A Physician's Order, dated 7/17/24, indicated to give Norco (opioid pain medication) 5 milligram (mg)/325 mg every 6 hours as needed for pain. The Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form for August 2024 indicated the resident received prn Norco between 8/13 and 8/19 on the following dates and times: 8/13/24 2:30 am 8/14/24 12:00 a.m. 8/14/24 10:00 a.m. 8/15/24 2:39…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Resident's record was completed in a timely manner, related to a change in condition assessment not charted at the time of the change and then had late entries entered 9 days after the event, for 1 of 10 residents reviewed for medical records. (Resident C) Finding includes: Resident C's record was reviewed on 4/3/24 at 11:48 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, non traumatic, respiratory failure, bipolar, aphasia, vascular implants and grafts, spina-bifida with shunts, and history of breast cancer (9/23/22). A Nurse's Progress Note, dated 3/27/24 at 3:54 p.m. for 3/18/24 at 4:01 p.m., written by LPN 1, indicated the resident was exiting the facility and being transferred to the emergency room by three Paramedics. The resident's Power of Attorney was made aware. The Nurse Practitioner was notified of the transfer. A Change of Condition assessment form, dated 3/27/24 at 3:54 p.m. for 3/18/24 at 3:30 p.m., written by LPN 1, indicated Resident C had abnormal vital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to determine self-administration of medications was appropriate for residents, related to medications left with the residents for self administration and no assessment to indicate the residents were appropriate for self administration of medications, for 2 of 2 residents observed with medications left in the room for administration. (Residents N and K) Findings include: 1) During an observation on 2/19/24 at 9:03 a.m., Resident N was in her room and in bed. with the head of the bed elevated. Located on the table next to the bed. were four stacked plastic medication cups with three to four pills in each one, one cup by itself with one pill, and one cup by itself with five pills in it, and a bottle of turmeric capsules (supplement). She indicated she takes the turmeric. She indicated the cup sitting by itself with the five pills contained the vitamins she takes and it was brought to her this morning, and the others were extras. She stated she did not need the Nurse to stand by her when she took the medications.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the requirements for a resident initiated discharge were completed, related to documentation of the intent to discharge, lack of a discharge planning Care Plan, lack of a discussion with the resident or Responsible Party about the discharge, and lack of a Discharge Summary, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharges from the facility. (Resident J) Finding includes: Resident J's closed record was reviewed on 2/20/24 at 11:19 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke. The resident was discharged from the facility on 2/13/24. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 1/22/24, indicated an intact cognitive status, had no behaviors, required moderate assistance for toileting, dressing of the upper body, bed mobility, transfers and ambulation. She required maximum assistance with showers and dressing of the lower extremities and was dependent for wheelchair mobility. The current Care Plan, dated 1/15/24, indicated assistance was required for all activities of daily living. The Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards, related to treatment, assessment, and documentation of a skin condition, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care related to skin conditions. (Resident D) Finding includes: During an interview on 2/19/24 at 4 p.m., Resident D was in her room and in bed. She indicated she was given a shower today, she had a rash under her breasts and abdominal folds, and the staff only applied powder to the areas after they bathed her. The area under the left breast was observed and was pink, and had a superficial rash on the inner area of the upper abdomen under the breast. Resident D's record was reviewed on 2/19/24 at 1:51 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 1/9/24, indicated an intact cognitive status, no behaviors, was dependent for showers, hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers. Applications of ointments or medications were provided to areas…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to initiate Care Plans related to psychotropic medications for 1 of 26 residents whose Care Plans were reviewed. (Resident 80) Finding includes: The record for Resident 80 was reviewed on 12/15/23 at 10:55 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy, cellulitis of the left lower limb, vascular dementia, dementia with behaviors, high blood pressure, non-psychotic mental disorder, and Alzheimer's disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/3/23, indicated the resident was not cognitively intact and was receiving an antipsychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant, and diuretic medication. Physician's Orders, dated 5/25/23, indicated Lorazepam (an anti-anxiety medication) 0.5 milligrams (mg), 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. Physician's Orders, dated 9/28/23, indicated Sertraline (an antidepressant medication) 50 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth daily. There was no Care Plan for the Sertraline or the Lorazepam medications. During an interview on 12/19/23 at 12:30 p.m., Nurse Consultant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan meetings were completed quarterly and/or included the resident, responsible party, and IDT (interdisciplinary team) members as required for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for care planning. (Residents 72 and 20) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 12/13/23 at 10:21 a.m., Resident 72 indicated he had not been invited or attended any care plan conferences for a while. Resident 72's record was reviewed on 12/15/23 at 10:27 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 9/3/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. There was a lack of documentation any care plan meetings had been completed. During an interview on 12/15/23 at 11:20 a.m., the Social Service Director indicated she was new to the facility and would see if she could find any care conference documentation. On 12/15/23 at 12:51 p.m., the Administrator provided a care conference report from the facility's previous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) related to nail care and the removal of facial hair for 3 of 9 residents reviewed for ADL's. (Residents 88, B, and 20) Findings include: 1. On 12/13/23 at 10:44 a.m., Resident 88 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the memory care dining room. At that time, there was a large amount of facial hair observed on her face, chin and neck areas. On 12/14/23 at 9:45 a.m. and 1:50 p.m., on 12/15/23 at 8:08 a.m. and 12:50 p.m., and on 12/18/23 at 9:35 a.m. and 11:45 a.m., the resident was observed sitting in her wheelchair in the memory care dining room. At those times, she had a large amount of facial hair on her chin, face, and neck areas. The record for Resident 88 was reviewed on 12/15/23 at 1:07 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, high blood pressure, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and psychotic disorder with delusions. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/5/23, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure treatments were obtained for non pressure ulcers, and bruises and sutures were assessed and monitored for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions, and residents were assessed and monitored after falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Residents 51, 80 and 53) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 12/13/23 at 1:50 p.m., Resident 51 indicated he had 2 sores on his butt and they hurt really bad. They were putting something over them to cover them up but that was over a month ago and they have not done anything since then. At 2:03 p.m., CNA 3 was asked to remove the resident's brief and roll him onto his side so his buttocks could be viewed. The CNA removed his brief and rolled him over and at that time there were was a large reddened area on his sacrum with 2 open areas on the left buttock. The CNA cleaned the resident and removed peri cream from the drawer and put it all over the red area. The resident's legs were very dry with scaly skin. The record for Resident 51 was reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with impaired vision received the necessary services for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for vision. (Resident 72) Finding includes: During an interview on 12/13/23 at 10:25 a.m., Resident 72 indicated he had glasses, but had not seen the eye doctor for a while. He needed to see a specialist for his right eye as he was going blind in that eye. Resident 72's record was reviewed on 12/15/23 at 10:27 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 9/3/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. His vision was listed as adequate with no corrective lenses. A Physician's Order, dated 4/20/23, indicated the resident may receive services of eye care physician, audiologist, dentist, and podiatrist. Eye Care Consult Notes, dated 5/16/23 and 8/8/23, indicated the resident had been scheduled to be treated those days but was not as he was unavailable due to being at dialysis. There was a lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing for pressure ulcers related to completing treatments as ordered for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 216) Finding includes: On 12/14/23 at 1:59 p.m., Resident 216 was observed lying in bed with eyes closed. Soft boots were in place to both feet. Record review for Resident 216 was completed on 12/14/23 at 9:17 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cerebral infarction. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Wound Rounds, dated 12/11/23, indicated the resident was admitted with a deep tissue injury to the left heel and a fluid filled blister to the left plantar foot. The Physician's Order Summary, dated 12/2023, indicated an order to cleanse the left heel with normal saline or wound cleanser, apply skin prep, and leave open to air daily. A separate order indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a history of falls was wearing the proper footwear to prevent further falls and/or injury for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident D) Finding includes: On 12/13/23 at 11:00 a.m., Resident D was observed in bed wearing plain socks to both feet. At that time, there was a floor mat beside the bed and the other side of the bed was against the wall. On 12/14/23 at 9:46 a.m., the resident was observed in bed and attempting to get out with their legs hanging over the side of the bed. The resident was wearing plain socks to both feet with no non-skids. On 12/14/23 at 3:11 p.m., on 12/15/23 at 8:10 a.m. and 1:30 p.m., and on 12/18/23 at 9:36 a.m. and 11:45 a.m., the resident was observed in bed wearing plain sock with no non-skids to both feet. The record for Resident D was reviewed on 12/15/23 at 9:15 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, malnutrition, weakness, psychotic disorder, alcohol dependence, high blood pressure, dementia, and adult failure to thrive. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Registered Dietitian's (RD) recommendations were acted upon in a timely manner for a resident with a history of weight loss for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 52) Finding includes: The record for Resident 52 was reviewed on 12/14/23 at 2:03 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure, repeated falls, restlessness and agitation, high blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, and dementia with behaviors. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/14/23, indicated the resident was not cognitively intact. The resident had complaints or difficulty swallowing and weighed 116 pounds. He received a mechanically altered diet and had no significant weight loss during the assessment period. A Care Plan, revised on 11/6/23, indicated the resident was at risk for impaired nutritional status due to a mechanically altered diet and a history of weight loss. The resident's current weight on 12/7/23 was 114 pounds. The resident weighed 117 pounds on 8/2/23 and 111 pounds…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was on and set at the correct flow rate, and tracheostomy care was completed as ordered by the Physician for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Residents 27, 6, 17, and 4) Findings include: 1. On 12/13/23 at 1:41 p.m., Resident 27 was observed in bed. At that time, her oxygen tubing was laying the bed next to her. The oxygen concentrator in the room was set at 2.5 liters per minute. On 12/14/23 at 9:37 a.m. and 1:49 p.m., the resident was observed in bed and the oxygen tubing was in both nares and the flow rate was set at 2.5 liters per minute. On 12/15/23 at 8:05 a.m., the resident was observed in bed and the oxygen tubing was laying in the bed and not in her nares. On 12/15/23 at 12:49 p.m. and 2:20 p.m., the resident was in bed and her oxygen was not in her nares and was turned off. On 12/18/23 at 9:30 a.m., the resident was observed in bed and her oxygen was in both nares with the concentrator set at 2.5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide care according to the Care Plan to prevent injury for a resident with dementia and who was combative with care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dementia care. (Resident 52) Finding includes: The record for Resident 52 was reviewed on 12/14/23 at 2:03 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure, repeated falls, restlessness and agitation, high blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, and dementia with behaviors. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/14/23, indicated the resident was not cognitively intact. The resident had complaints or difficulty swallowing and weighed 116 pounds. He received a mechanically altered diet and had no significant weight loss during the assessment period. A Care Plan, revised on 10/23/23, indicated the resident became combative with staff when given care, as evidenced by swinging arms and hitting staff. The approaches were to educate the resident of the necessity of care, ensure the resident was safe, provide emotional support regarding the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were managed appropriately related to missed medications, the timing of medications, and no indication for the use of Morphine Sulfate for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents D and B). Findings include: 1. The record for Resident D was reviewed on 12/15/23 at 9:15 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, malnutrition, weakness, psychotic disorder, alcohol dependence, high blood pressure, dementia, and adult failure to thrive. The State Optional Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/2/23 indicated the resident was not cognitively intact and was an extensive assist with a 1 person assist for bed mobility and transfers. The resident displayed physical and verbal behaviors 1 to 3 days during the reference period. The 10/2/23 Quarterly MDS assessment indicated the resident received an antidepressant medication. The resident received hospice services as of 12/1/23. Physician's Orders, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted first before the administration of an anti-anxiety medication and the medication was documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident D) Finding includes: The record for Resident D was reviewed on 12/15/23 at 9:15 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, malnutrition, weakness, psychotic disorder, alcohol dependence, high blood pressure, dementia, and adult failure to thrive. The State Optional Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/2/23, indicated the resident was not cognitively intact and was an extensive assist with a 1 person assist for bed mobility and transfers. The resident displayed physical and verbal behaviors 1 to 3 days during the reference period. The 10/2/23 Quarterly MDS assessment indicated the resident received an antidepressant medication. The resident received hospice services as of 12/1/23. Physician's Orders, dated 12/6/23, indicated Lorazepam concentrate 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control guidelines were in place and implemented related to isolation precautions for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for antibiotic use. (Resident 59) Finding includes: During an interview on 12/14/23 at 10:42 a.m., Resident 59 indicated she had a wound to her abdomen that recently became infected, and she was just started on an antibiotic. She was unsure if she was on any type of isolation precautions. There was no isolation signage posted on her door nor any PPE (personal protective equipment) bin outside her room. On 12/14/23 at 2:04 p.m., the resident was lying in bed with her eyes closed. There was no isolation signage posted on her door nor any PPE bin outside her room. On 12/18/23 at 11:20 a.m., the resident was lying in bed watching television. There was no isolation signage posted on her door nor any PPE bin outside her room. On 12/18/23 at 11:53 a.m., staff delivered the resident's lunch tray to her. They did not don PPE prior to entering the room. There was no isolation signage posted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food temperatures were monitored for each meal. This had the potential to affect the 100 residents who received their food from the kitchen. (The Main Kitchen) Finding includes: On 9/20/23 at 10:02 a.m., a kitchen sanitation tour was completed with the Dietary Food Manager (DFM). The food temperature binder was reviewed at that time. The food temperature logs for August and September 2023 were lacking documentation for the following dates and meals: - No documentation of lunch temperatures on 8/21/23. - No documentation of breakfast or lunch temperatures on 8/23/23 and 9/5/23. - No documentation of dinner temperatures on 9/1/23. - No documentation of any food temperatures on 9/2 and 9/3/23. The food temperatures that were documented from 9/5 through 9/20/23, were documented at the start of the meal service. Interview with the DFM at that time, indicated food temperatures were to be documented for each meal. The facility policy titled, Safe Food Handling was provided by the Administrator on 9/21/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed and monitored prior to being sent to the hospital for a change in condition and hospice orders were followed as written for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for a change in condition and 1 of 1 residents reviewed for hospice. (Resident B) Finding includes: The closed record for Resident B was reviewed on 9/20/23 at 12:16 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness and/or paralysis on one side of the body) following a stroke affecting the left non-dominant side, palliative care, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), type 2 diabetes, protein calorie malnutrition, and depression. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/17/23, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired for daily decision making and she was totally dependent for bed mobility and needed extensive assistance with transfers and eating. Nurses' Notes, dated 5/11/23 at 8:45 p.m., indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food served to resident rooms was received hot for 1 of 2 units observed. This had the potential to affect the 56 residents who resided on that unit and received food from the kitchen. (East Unit) Finding includes: Interview with Resident J, who resided on the East Unit, on 11/14/22 at 1:43 p.m., indicated the food was not warm for a lot of the meals she had been served. On 11/21/22 at 12:34 p.m., the last tray from the East Unit food tray cart was removed. It was delivered with the plastic dome lid covering the plate. At that time, the Dietary Manager removed the plastic dome lid and used a food thermometer to obtain the following food temperatures: - Barbeque meatloaf: 127 degrees - Mashed potatoes with brown gravy: 125 degrees - Seasoned corn: 113 degrees Interview with the Dietary Manager at that time, indicated she would like the temperature to be a little warmer, approximately 135 degrees or warmer. 3.1-21(a)(2)
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve and prepare food under sanitary conditions related to dirty food equipment, steam tables, wire racks, standing fans, and standing mixer for 1 of 1 kitchens observed. This had the potential to affect the 116 residents who received food from the kitchen. (The Main Kitchen) Findings include: During the Brief Kitchen Sanitation Tour on 11/14/22 at 9:18 a.m. with the Dietary Food Manager, the following was observed: a. There was a moderate amount of dirt and dust on the storage racks that housed clean pots and pans. b. There was a heavy accumulation of burned food and crumbs on the stove top. c. There was a heavy accumulation of food spillage and grease on the inside of both convection ovens and on the inside of the glass doors. There was grease noted on the sides of the ovens. d. There was a heavy accumulation of grease on the sides of the griddle, stove, and both ovens. e. The handles to the ovens were sticky to touch. e. There was a heavy accumulation of dirt and dust on the standing fan blades blowing directly at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control guidelines were in place and implemented, including those to prevent and/or contain COVID-19, related to ensuring hand hygiene was completed before and after glove removal. The facility also failed to ensure lancets were disposed of properly for 2 of 2 glucometers observed, personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn correctly during COVID-19 testing, masks were worn correctly, wash basins were stored correctly, and multi-use equipment was disinfected for random observations for infection control. (Residents 58, 90, 102, 82, 85, 41, and G) Findings include: 1. On 11/17/22 at 4:08 p.m., RN 1 was preparing to check Resident 58's blood sugar. The RN washed her hands and donned a pair of gloves. She wiped the glucometer with a sani wipe, removed her gloves, did not hand sanitize, and donned a new pair of gloves. The RN then proceeded to punch the resident's pills from the punch card into the medication cup. When…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment as well as the kitchen area was clean and in good repair related to dirty floors, marred doors, lime build up, dirty heating unit covers, dirty baseboards, food build up on the baseboards, lime build up on pipes, dirty floor tile, and dirty transportation carts in 1 of 1 kitchen areas and on 3 of 4 units. (The Main Kitchen and East, West, and Memory Care Units) Findings include: 1. During the Environmental tour with the Director of Maintenance and the Director of Housekeeping on 11/16/22 at 10:00 a.m., the following was observed: East Unit a. The privacy curtain in room [ROOM NUMBER] was stained. b. Only one side of the window blind in room [ROOM NUMBER] pulled up. The front of the heating unit was loose and was coming off. One resident resided in this room. West Unit a. An accumulation of lime build up was observed on the bathroom faucet in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The floor tile in the bathroom was dirty and a black…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had Physician's Orders for medications and an assessment to self-administer their own medications for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Residents 32 and 38) Findings include: 1. On 11/18/22 at 8:50 a.m., Resident 32 asked QMA 1 for her Nystatin (an anti-fungal) powder. The QMA took the powder to the resident and left it in the room. The record for Resident 32 was reviewed on 11/22/22 at 9:21 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes and functional quadriplegia. The 10/22/22 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident did not have a Care Plan for self-administration of medications nor did she have an Self-Administration of medication assessment. A Physician's Order, dated 7/8/22, indicated the resident was to receive Nystatin powder 100,000 unit/gram, apply to affected areas daily as needed. There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were invited to their Care Plan conferences for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for care planning. (Residents 38 and D) Findings include: 1. During an interview with Resident 38 on 11/14/22 at 10:19 a.m., he indicated he does not recall being invited to attend a care conference. The record for Resident 38 was reviewed on 11/15/22 at 2:20 p.m. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia without behaviors, high blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and cognitive communication. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/16/22, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for decision making. There was no documentation of a care conference for the resident since admission. Interview with the Nurse Consultant on 11/21/22 at 12:45 p.m., indicated the resident had a care conference held today. 2. During an interview with Resident D on 11/14/22 at 10:50 a.m., she indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received help with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) related to repositioning in bed, hair washed, and showers, for 2 of 9 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Residents D and B) Findings include: 1. During an interview with Resident D on [DATE] at 10:45 a.m., she indicated her hair was greasy and had not been washed in a very long time. Her bathing preference was a bed bath, which she received 2 times a week. On [DATE] at 11:15 a.m., the resident was observed lying in bed. The right side of the bed was against the wall. At that time, CNA 1 was observed standing next to the bed holding a bed pan in one hand. The resident indicated she had to have a bowel movement. The CNA instructed the resident to turn onto her right side so she could place the bed pan under her. The resident was very obese, and was unable to turn by herself onto her side. The CNA placed both of her hands on the resident's left hip and physically…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure areas of bruising were assessed and monitored for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for skin conditions, non-pressure related. (Resident E) Finding includes: On 11/14/22 at 9:59 a.m., Resident E was observed sitting in a chair inside her room. At that time the resident's entire forehead, nose, around both eyes and her cheek bones were red and purple color. The record for Resident E was reviewed on 11/16/22 at 9:45 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression, fractured right femur, dementia with other behavioral disturbances, repeated falls, weakness, and high blood pressure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/6/22, indicated the resident was not cognitively intact and had no mood or behaviors. The resident needed extensive assist with 2 person physical assist for transfers. The resident had no falls since the last assessment. Nurses' Notes, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure splints were applied as ordered and range of motion was completed for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM). (Residents 1, 30, and 90) Findings include: 1. On 11/14/22 at 10:00 a.m., Resident 1 was observed in his room seated in a broda chair. The resident's right hand had a splint in place. On 11/15/22 at 10:24 a.m., the resident's right hand was closed in a first and no anti-contracture device was in use. On 11/16/22 at 11:04 a.m. and 1:31 p.m., the resident was wearing a right hand splint. On 11/17/22 at 10:17 a.m., 11:44 a.m., and 3:50 p.m., the resident was not wearing the splint to his right hand. On 11/18/22 at 8:20 a.m., the splint was not in use. On 11/21/22 at 9:40 a.m. and 11:58 a.m., the splint was not in use. The record for Resident 1 was reviewed on 11/17/22 at 3:41 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness and paralysis) affecting his right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for residents with a history of falls with and without injury related to a floor mattress and non-slip socks for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for falls. (Residents E, F, and C) Findings include: 1. On 11/14/22 at 9:59 a.m., Resident E was observed sitting in a chair inside her room. At that time the resident's entire forehead, nose, around both eyes and her cheek bones were red and purple color. On 11/15/22 at 10:06 a.m., the resident was observed in bed. At that time, the floor mattress was standing up on end and not on the floor beside the bed. At 10:08 a.m. the Restorative Nurse walked into the room and swabbed the resident for COVID-19. She left the room and left the mattress standing on end. At 10:21 a.m., the mattress was still standing on end and not on the floor beside the resident. At 10:45 a.m., LPN 1 entered the room and placed the mattress on the floor beside the bed. On 11/16/22 at 1:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a urinary catheter received the necessary treatment and services related to completing catheter care as ordered for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. (Residents J and 84) Findings include: 1. Interview with Resident J on 11/14/22 at 1:48 p.m., indicated the resident did not always receive catheter care every shift. The record for Resident J was reviewed on 11/16/22 at 2:01 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, high blood pressure, paraplegia, chronic lung disease, diabetes mellitus, and depression. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/23/22, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident required extensive assistant with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. She had an indwelling catheter and an ostomy. A Care Plan, dated 4/27/22, indicated the resident required an indwelling catheter. Interventions included, but were not limited to, provide catheter care as ordered and as needed, and provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure reweights were obtained, food consumption logs were completed and supplements were provided for residents with a history of weight loss for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Residents H and B) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident H was reviewed on 11/16/22 at 2:06 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia (muscle weakness), stroke, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and type 2 diabetes. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/9/22, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with eating. The resident had no weight issues and received a mechanically altered diet. A Care Plan, reviewed on 11/10/22, indicated the resident required a mechanically altered diet. Interventions included, but were not limited to, obtain/record weight per facility protocol. Notify the Physician and family of any significant weight change. A Care Plan, reviewed on 11/10/22, indicated the resident was limited in functional status in regards to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure gastrostomy tube placement was checked prior to administering medications and the water flush and medications were instilled via gravity for 1 of 1 gastrostomy tube medication administrations. (Resident 24) Finding includes: On 11/18/22 at 11:27 a.m., LPN 2 was observed preparing medications for Resident 24. The resident was going to receive Oyster Shell Calcium 500 milligrams (mg), Prevacid (a medication for gastroesophageal reflux) 30 mg, and Sucralfate (an antacid) 1 gram by the way of her gastrostomy tube (G Tube). At 11:45 a.m., the LPN entered the resident's room. Prior to giving the medications, the LPN placed her stethoscope on the resident's abdomen and she listened to the resident's bowel sounds for placement of the tube. She did not instill an air bolus or check for residual. The LPN then proceeded to administer a water flush prior to giving the medications, she used the plunger of the syringe and pushed the water through the tube instead of letting the water instill via gravity. The LPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with complaints of pain received scheduled medication to relieve the pain for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pain. (Resident J) Finding includes: Interview with Resident J on 11/14/22 at 1:53 p.m., indicated she did not always receive her pain medications. The record for Resident J was reviewed on 11/16/22 at 2:01 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, high blood pressure, paraplegia, chronic lung disease, diabetes mellitus, and depression. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/23/22, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. She had an indwelling catheter and an ostomy. She received a scheduled pain medication regimen. A Care Plan, dated 4/7/22, indicated the resident had complaints of chronic pain related to intractable back pain and wounds. Interventions included, but were not limited to, administer medications and monitor and record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure insulin was administered as ordered related to sliding scale insulin for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents G and J) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident G was reviewed on 11/17/22 at 1:30 p.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy, stroke, high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, repeated falls, major depressive disorder, syncope, specified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/4/22 indicated the resident was not cognitively intact. In the last 7 days the resident received insulin 7 times and an antipsychotic medication 7 times. A Care Plan, dated 11/9/22, indicated the resident received insulin related to diabetes mellitus. The approaches were to administer insulin per doctor's order. Physician's Orders, dated 11/8/22, indicated Insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive unnecessary medications without adequate indications for use and prn (as needed) anti-anxiety medication were only administered after non-pharmaceutical interventions were attempted for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents G and F) Findings include: 1. On 11/16/22 at 9:34 a.m., Resident G was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the memory care dining room. At that time, his head was low and his eyes were closed. At 11:15 a.m., the resident remained with his eyes closed. At 1:30 p.m., the resident was observed sitting in his wheelchair with his back facing the room door. At that time, his head was low and his eyes were closed. The record for Resident G was reviewed on 11/17/22 at 1:30 p.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy, stroke, high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, repeated falls, major…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were locked when out of view on 1 of 3 units throughout the facility. (The [NAME] Unit) Finding includes: On 11/17/22 at 4:27 p.m., RN 1 entered Resident 90's room to administer her medications. The medication cart was left unlocked and the cart was out of the RN's view when she was in the resident's room. At 4:44 p.m., the RN remained in the resident's room and the cart was still unlocked and out of her view. Interview with the Nurse Consultant on 11/21/22 at 2:15 p.m., indicated the medication cart should have been locked prior to entering the resident's room. A facility policy, titled Storage of Medications was provided by the Administrative Consultant on 11/22/22 at 3:04 p.m. The policy indicated medication rooms, carts, emergency kits/boxes, and medication supplies were to be locked when not attended by persons with authorized access. 3.1-25(m)
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a resident with a nourishing and well-balanced diet and failed to provide special dietary needs for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutritional services. (Resident J) Finding includes: During an interview on 11/14/22 at 1:28 p.m., Resident J indicated she had an allergy to corn and corn products, but the facility staff were still serving her corn products. She indicated she often just ate less during her meals because of it. During an observation of a lunch meal on 11/21/22 at 12:42 p.m., the resident received her lunch which consisted of barbeque meat loaf, mashed potatoes with brown gravy, seasoned corn, cornbread, juice, and a S'Mores bar dessert. The resident's meal card was still on the tray, which indicated for lunch meals the resident was to receive double protein and juice with lunch. The resident was not to be served: corn, cornbread, soda, juice drinks, barbeque sauce, jelly, crackers, applesauce, syrup, any desserts, or grits. The residents allergies were listed as corn. The meal card…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or responsible parties were offered the opportunity to receive or decline an influenza and pneumococcal immunization and provided education on the benefits and potential side effects of the immunizations for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Residents D and 72) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident D was reviewed on 11/17/22 at 1:30 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy, respiratory syncytial virus, respiratory failure, high blood pressure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and dementia. There was no documentation the resident was offered the influenza or pneumococcal immunizations or provided education regarding them. 2. The record for Resident 72 was reviewed on 11/16/22 at 2:14 p.m. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, high blood pressure, coronary artery disease, depression, and dysphagia. There was no documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-02-20 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the posted Nurse Staffing Information was up-to-date and current, related to a lack of facility census documented on the postings. This had the potential to affect all of the residents who resided in the facility for the month of February, 2024. Findings include: During an observation on 2/19/24 at 10 a.m., the Nursing Staff Posting was posted at the front door of the facility. The facility census was not documented on the posting. At the time of the observation, the Administrator indicated the census was usually written on the posting after the morning meeting. The Nursing Staff Schedules and Postings from 1/10/24 to 2/11/24 were reviewed on 2/19/24 at 7 p.m. There was no facility census posted on the postings from 2/5/24 through 2/11/24. The Administrator acknowledged on 2/20/24 at 10 a.m., the facility census had not been documented on the postings. This citation relates to Complaints IN00426658 and IN00428128.
- No harm found · B2022-11-22 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident and/or their Responsible Party were notified in writing related to a transfer to the hospital for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Residents 1, 73, 110, 72, and 77) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 1 was reviewed on 11/17/22 at 3:41 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness and paralysis) affecting his right dominant side following a stroke and altered mental status. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/26/22, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. Nurses' Notes, dated 8/23/22 at 10:22 p.m., indicated the CNA reported to the nurse the resident had dark colored emesis. The nurse observed the resident with coffee ground emesis. The Physician was notified and orders were obtained to send the resident to the emergency room for evaluation. 911 was called for transport. The resident was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$23,257 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-04-05
- $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-04-05
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CASA CONSULTING — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLAXTON, RYAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/27/2025 |
| DYER HC, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2023 |
| LEWIS, SHELDON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2021 |
| MACKLIN, BRADLEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| SIEGAL, MOSHE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2023 |
| KURTZ, ELISHEVA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/05/2025 |
| ROTHNER, DANIEL | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/19/2025 |
| ROTHNER, WILLIAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/19/2025 |
| RUDOLPH, KIMBERLY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/19/2025 |
| VALES, ADAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/19/2025 |
| CASA CONSULTING, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2023 |
| DYER HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2023 |
| MAJOR HOSPITAL | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/25/2025 |
| ALVAREZ, GEORGE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| CRAWFORD, TENCREE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| DAVIS, PHILLICIA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| HUNTER, LAURA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| SUTTON, LISA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| WHITE JONES, TAMARA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155220. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.