Harbor Health & Rehab
5025 McCook Ave, East Chicago, IN 46312 · Non profit - Other · 106 certified beds · (219) 397-0380 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (69) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $13,637 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-09)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.9% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.6% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 46.5% | 25.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.0% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.5% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 5.4% | 23.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.9% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.0% | 3.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.3% | 23.3% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.4% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.5% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 28.3% | 79.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.35 | 1.61 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.99 | 1.44 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.3%CMS range 25.7–55.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 6.4–14.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.22 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 68.8 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.77 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.45 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.88 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
69 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 56 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident only received food in the form ordered by the physician related to the consumption of a regular donut during a transport which led to a choking incident and resulted in respiratory failure, cardiac arrest and ultimately his demise for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for mechanically altered diets. (Resident B) The immediate jeopardy began on 7/18/23 when the Administrator fed Resident B a regular donut, not in pureed form, which he consumed during a facility transport. Soon after, he turned blue, started choking and the Heimlich maneuver was performed. He then stopped breathing, CPR was initiated, and he was transferred to the hospital. The Regional [NAME] President Operations was notified of the immediate jeopardy on 7/25/23 at 10:51 a.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed and the deficient practice was corrected by 7/20/23, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Finding includes: The closed record for Resident B was reviewed on 7/24/23 at 11:35 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received adequate assistance and supervision to prevent accidents related to only one staff person assisting during a mechanical lift transfer for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 3) This deficient practice resulted in the resident falling and receiving a fracture to her leg. The deficient practice was corrected on 7/22/24, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. The facility identified the concern, completed a house wide sweep of the Hoyer lifts (a mechanical lift) and Hoyer slings, an inservice was held related to transfer techniques and two person staff assist while using the Hoyer lift, return demonstration by staff was observed, and audits related to the use of the Hoyer lift were being completed weekly. Finding includes: During an interview on 8/6/24 at 9:25 a.m., Resident 3 indicated she had fallen from the Hoyer lift about 3 weeks ago and she hurt her leg. She indicated she had been transferred by 1 staff person. The record for Resident 3 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was monitored for signs and symptoms of constipation. The lack of assessment and monitoring resulted in the resident being hospitalized with a severe fecal impaction for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for constipation. (Resident 60) The facility also failed to ensure a fall follow up assessment was completed and an assessment including vital signs was documented prior to hospitalization for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls and 2 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Residents E and 12) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 7/24/23 at 10:12 a.m., Resident 60 indicated he has horrible constipation issues and sometimes only has 1 bowel movement a week. He did not think he always received his Miralax (a laxative medication) as scheduled. During an interview on 7/26/23 at 10:55 a.m., the resident indicated he was very constipated and had not had a bowel movement yet this week. Staff were supposed to order an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Care Plans were updated with interventions for residents who had behaviors, falls, schizophrenia, and abuse care plans for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident B, C, D, and E) Findings include:1. The record for Resident B was reviewed on 2/23/26 at 9:53 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's, psychotic disorder, hypertension (high blood pressure), depression, anemia (low iron), depression, and COPD.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/4/25, indicated Resident B was cognitively impaired for daily decision making.A facility reported incident, dated 12/11/25, indicated Resident B went to offer Resident D a piece of candy and Resident D had swatted at Resident B, which knocked the candy to the floor. A nurse had witnessed the incident, and no physical contact was made between the two residents and no injuries were noted. An investigation was initiated.A facility reported incident, dated 2/2/26, indicated staff had overheard a verbal altercation between Resident B…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Responsible Party was notified of a roommate change for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for notification of change. (Resident B) Finding includes:The record for Resident B was reviewed on 2/23/26 at 9:53 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's, psychotic disorder, hypertension (high blood pressure), depression, anemia (low iron), depression, and COPD. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/4/25, indicated Resident B was cognitively impaired for daily decision making. A Nurse's Progress Note, dated 1/22/26 at 12:46 a.m., indicated the resident appeared to be adjusting well to his new roommate. There was no documentation of the resident's Responsible Party being notified of the new roommate. During an interview on 2/24/26 at 10:25 a.m., the Director of Nursing did not notify the Responsible Party of the roommate change, she was under the impression notification was only to be reported for a room change. She was now educating the staff to notify appropriate parties when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan meetings occurred for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for care planning. (Resident B)Finding includes:The record for Resident B was reviewed on 2/23/26 at 9:53 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's, psychotic disorder, hypertension (high blood pressure), depression, anemia (low iron), depression, and COPD.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/4/25, indicated Resident B was cognitively impaired for daily decision making.A Social Services Note, dated 9/23/25, indicated the Social Service Director (SSD) had called to schedule a care plan meeting with the resident's daughter. She had stated she was on her way to visit her father and could have the meeting when she arrived at the facility. The SSD indicated she was free to conduct the meeting when she arrived.The resident's last Care Plan Meeting was on 9/23/25.There was no documentation indicating a care plan meeting had occurred after 9/23/25.During an interview on 2/24/26 at 11:33 a.m., the Nurse Consultant indicated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with behaviors received appropriate treatment and services to meet his needs, related to ongoing consistent behaviors without updated behavior interventions following an incident on 12/24/26 that resulted in 2 hospitalizations within 48 hours, and lacked 15-minute safety checks upon the resident's return for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for behaviors. (Resident C)Finding includes:The record for Resident C was reviewed on 2/24/26 at 2:47 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizophrenia, dementia, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), depression, anxiety, mild cognitive impairment, mild intellectual abilities, restlessness and agitation, HIV, and alcohol abuse.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/4/25, indicated Resident C was cognitively intact for daily decision making. Verbal behaviors were exhibited and the resident's current behavior was worse than the previous assessment.A Nurse's Note, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure clinical records were accurate and complete related to 15 minute safety checks for residents who had behaviors for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident C)Finding includes:The record for Resident C was reviewed on 2/24/26 at 2:47 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizophrenia, dementia, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), depression, anxiety, mild cognitive impairment, mild intellectual abilities, restlessness and agitation, HIV, and alcohol abuse.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/4/25, indicated Resident C was cognitively intact for daily decision making. Verbal behaviors were exhibited and the resident's current behavior was worse than the previous assessment.A Physician's Order, dated 2/16/26, indicated to initiate 15-minute safety checks every shift for monitoring.Safety logs were observed on the second floor and Resident C's 15-minute safety checks were not signed out from 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. on 2/24/26.During an interview on 2/24/26 at 4:15 p.m., LPN 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-17 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the mandatory submission of staffing information, based on payroll data, was electronically submitted to iQIES. This had the potential to affect the 70 residents who resided in the facility. Finding includes: Nurse Staffing information was reviewed on 12/16/25 at 3:30 p.m. The CMS Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data report for FY Quarter 4 2025 indicated the facility failed to submit data.During an interview on 12/16/25 at 4:20 p.m., the [NAME] President (VP) of Operations indicated he was able to pull up the submission log of PBJ for the 4th quarter for the facility. The information from iQIES indicated there was a connection error and files failed to send. He indicated Nurse Consultant 1, the Human Resource (HR) Director Consultant, and himself all sit down quarterly and go over all the schedules before submitting to iQIES. During an interview on 12/17/25 at 9:15 a.m., Nurse Consultant 1 indicated she had called iQIES the previous day and they informed her it was the facility's responsibility to make sure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's dignity was maintained related to not offering beverages to residents while participating in activities. The facility also failed to ensure personal care signs were not posted in resident rooms for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for dignity. (Residents 2, 20, 1, and 43)Findings include:1. During a random observation on 12/11/25 at 10:28 a.m., Resident 2 was observed in the Second Floor dining room participating in an activity. The resident received a cup of coffee from the activity aide and proceeded to attempt to pick up the coffee and drink from the cup. At 10:33 a.m., a staff member removed the resident's cup of coffee from the table due to it not being thickened. The resident was not given anything else to drink and the residents around him continued to drink their coffee. On 12/12/25 at 9:58 a.m., the resident was again seated in the Second Floor dining room. Activity staff were passing out cups of coffee to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's privacy was respected related to completing a room search of their personal belongings without permission for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for privacy. (Resident 4)Finding includes:On 12/12/25 at 2:02 p.m., Resident 4 was observed lying in his bed, staring at the divider curtain while a movie was playing on his laptop. He appeared visibly upset, and was slow to speak. At that time, he indicated staff made him go to the resident Christmas party on the previous afternoon. He indicated he watched everyone else exchange gifts while he got nothing. When staff returned the resident to his room, the Director of Nursing (DON) informed him staff went through his belongings looking for smoking materials. The resident indicated he was upset he was not informed the sweep was going to happen, and that he was not given the opportunity to be there. The record for Resident 4 was reviewed on 12/12/25 at 2:35 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, quadriplegia, trauma, depression, and post-traumatic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) related to having their hair washed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Resident 24)Finding includes:During an interview on 12/12/25 at 9:35 a.m., Resident 24 indicated she did not like to go into the shower room and preferred a bed bath. She indicated she did not remember the last time her hair was washed. At that time, the resident's hair was greasy with a large amount of dandruff flakes noted. During random observations on 12/15/25 at 10:55 a.m., on 12/16/25 at 1:14 p.m., and on 12/17/25 at 9:55 a.m., the resident was observed in bed and her hair was greasy with flakes of dandruff noted. The resident indicated her hair had not been washed. The record for Resident 24 was reviewed on 12/15/25 at 10:30 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and osteoarthritis. The 8/31/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure follow up documentation after a fall was completed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for change in condition. The facility also failed to apply compression wraps as ordered for edema for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for edema. (Residents 19 and 1) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 19 was reviewed on 12/12/25 at 2:00 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, major depressive disorder, dementia, and high blood pressure. The 9/13/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was not cognitively intact for daily decision making and needed substantial to maximal assistance for transfers. The resident had no falls since the last assessment. A Care Plan, revised on 10/29/25, indicated the resident had a fall due to an unsteady gait. A Nurse's Note, dated 10/28/25 at 11:56 a.m., indicated the resident had a witnessed fall out of the wheelchair. A Post Fall Observation form, dated 10/28/25 at 1:25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 56 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided related to the serving of hot beverages and thickened liquids as well as a resident using a vape pen in their room for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Residents 2 and 63)Findings include: 1. During a random observation on 12/11/25 at 10:28 a.m., Resident 2 was observed in the Second Floor dining room participating in an activity. The resident received a cup of coffee from the activity aide that was not thickened. As she put the cup of coffee on the table, she told the resident to be careful because the coffee was hot. The resident proceeded to pick up the cup of coffee and it started to spill on the table and his hands due to his tremors. He waited a few seconds and attempted to pick up the cup again. The resident continued to shake but he was able to put the cup to his mouth and drink some of the coffee. There was no lid on the cup and he drank approximately a quarter of the coffee. At 10:33 a.m., a staff member came to the table and removed the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure indwelling Foley (urinary) catheter bags and tubing were kept off of the floor, nephrostomy tube equipment was changed and the site was monitored for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Foley catheters and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for nephrostomy tubes. (Residents 1 and 6)Findings include:1. During random observations on 12/16/25 at 8:29 a.m., LPN 3 was observed preparing medications for the resident outside of Resident 1's door. The door was wide open and the resident was observed in bed. The resident told the nurse to come back later to give him his medications and to close the door. At that time, the resident's Foley catheter bag and tubing was observed on the floor next to his bed. LPN 3 closed the resident's door and did not pick up the Foley bag off of the floor. During random observations on 12/16/25 at 9:34 a.m. and 11:15 a.m., Resident 1 was observed in bed. At those times, his Foley catheter bag and tubing was observed on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to check for peg tube (a tube inserted directly into the stomach for nutrition) placement properly prior to medication administration for 1 of 1 resident observed for peg tube medication administration. (Resident 11)Finding includes:During a medication administration observation on 12/16/25 at 8:02 a.m., RN 1 poured and prepared medications for Resident 11 to be administered through his peg tube. She entered the resident's room and placed his enteral tube feeding on hold. The RN removed the connection device and hung it over the pole. She then removed the syringe and placed it into one of the two ports on the peg tube. She poured 30 cubic centimeters (cc) of water down the tube via gravity. She removed the syringe and placed the piston inside and pulled back (checking for residual) the stomach contents. She pulled back less than five cc of fluid from each port. At that time, she indicated she was supposed to be able to pull back 30 cc of residual so she was going to notify the physician. During an interview at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an implanted port device was assessed and monitored for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for parental/IV fluids. (Resident 63) Finding includes:During a random observation on 12/12/25 at 2:00 p.m., Resident 63 was observed sitting in a wheelchair by the elevator. At that time, her shirt was falling off of her shoulder and an implanted port device was observed with a white bandage over it. The record for Resident 63 was reviewed on 12/12/25 at 2:40 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vulva cancer, adult failure to thrive, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety disorder, heart failure, and high blood pressure. The 9/26/25 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was moderately impaired for decision making. A Care Plan, dated 12/14/25, indicated the resident had a right chest port-a-cath (PAC). The approaches were to monitor the port and report changes to the physician. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage related to pre-filled saline syringes used to flush implanted port devices stored in the resident's room for 1 of 6 residents observed during medication pass. (Resident 74)Finding includes:During a medication pass observation on 12/15/25 at 2:12 p.m., LPN 2 entered Resident 74's room with an Intravenous (IV) antibiotic medication and two pre-filled normal saline syringes to flush the resident's line before the IV administration. At that time, inside the resident's room, there was a pre-filled normal saline syringe laying on the resident's over bed table as well as two pre-filled normal saline syringes on top of the night stand. The LPN used the two pre-filled syringes she had brought into the room to flush the resident's port and then placed the other three syringes on top of the night stand before she left the room She informed the resident she would be back in one hour to take the IV down and disconnect the tubing. At 3:28 p.m. LPN 2 entered the resident's room with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at a palatable temperature for one of one meal observation. (Residents 4, 24, and 42)Finding includes:During an interview on 12/11/25 at 11:16 am, Resident 4 indicated the facility's food was bad, and most of the time, he did not want to eat it. During an interview on 12/12/25 at 9:41 a.m., Resident 24 indicated the facility's food was often cold. During a resident council interview on 12/15/25 at 3:09 p.m., Resident 42 indicated food taste and temperature had been a concern brought up in resident council. He indicated the food was often cold when they received it. During a meal observation on 12/16/25 at 11:44 a.m., lunch trays were brought up on a non-insulated cart for the second floor dining room. On 12/16/2025 at 11:53 a.m., the test tray temperatures were checked by the Kitchen Manager as follows: chicken-104 degrees, rice-120 degrees, and black beans-120 degrees via a manual thermometer. The Kitchen Manager indicated she thought there was something wrong with the thermometer. She covered the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received physical therapy as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for rehabilitation services. (Resident 10)Finding includes:During an interview on 12/11/25 at 11:16 a.m., Resident 10 indicated he did not receive therapy and sometimes went many days without it. The record for Resident 10 was reviewed on 12/15/25 at 1:20 p.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited, chronic kidney disease and post surgical Thoracic 11 thru Lumbar 1 laminectomy (a procedure to remove pressure from the spinal cord). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/5/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and received speech, occupational, and physical therapy. A Physician's Order, dated 11/1/25, indicated physical therapy was to see the resident for five times a week for 30 days for therapeutic exercises, activity tolerance training, gait…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate related to inaccurate tube feeding residual amounts and incorrect resident information in a record for 1 of 21 records reviewed. (Resident 11) Finding includes:The record for Resident 11 was reviewed on 12/16/25 at 1:56 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure (CHF), dysphagia (trouble swallowing), and gastrostomy (a feeding tube inserted through the abdomen). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/17/25, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, required substantial assist with activities of daily living (ADLs), and had an enteral (tube) feeding.A Physician's Order, dated 11/19/25, indicated to verify the enteral feeding residual every shift, if more than 100 milliliters (ml), hold the feeding and notify the physician.The December 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated the following enteral tube feeding residual amounts: 12/1 1st shift-300, 12/4 2nd shift-300, 12/8 1st shift-300,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promote antibiotic stewardship by ensuring the appropriate use of antibiotic therapy and a system of monitoring to improve resident outcomes and reduce antibiotic resistance related to a resident remaining on an antibiotic after the organism was determined to be resistant to the medication and prescribing antibiotics for not true infections based on the McGeer Criteria for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident 8)Finding includes: During an interview on 12/12/25 at 10:23 a.m., Resident 8 indicated he was having issues with frequent urinary tract infections. The record for Resident 8 was reviewed on 12/16/25 at 10:37 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic kidney disease, renal dialysis, and obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage of urine flow). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/10/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and had an indwelling catheter. A Care Plan, dated 3/28/24 and reviewed on 9/10/25, indicated the resident had a suprapubic catheter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was set at the correct flow rate and signed out on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident E) Finding includes: On 4/7/25 at 9:08 a.m., Resident E was observed lying in bed. The resident's nasal cannula tubing was sitting under her nose and the oxygen flow rate was set a little above 1.5 liters as the ball was under the 2 liter line. On 4/8/25 at 8:51 a.m., the resident was observed in bed eating breakfast. Resident E was wearing oxygen via nasal cannula and the flow rate was set little over 1.5 liter line. During and interview at the time, LPN 1 indicated the resident was on 2 liters of oxygen. When asked to verify the rate again, LPN 1 verified it was not at 2 liters and moved the ball to the middle line of the 2 liter line. The record for Resident E was reviewed on 4/8/24 at 9:11 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, COPD, high blood pressure, heart failure and anxiety. The 3/3/25 Quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was in good repair related to marred walls, loose baseboards and missing bolts around the toilet for 1 of 2 floors observed. (First Floor) Findings include: During the Environmental Tour on 8/9/24 at 9:30 a.m. with the Maintenance Director, the following observed: First Floor a. room [ROOM NUMBER] - The cove base was pulling away from the wall near the entrance of the room. The walls were marred under the chair rail. The base of bathroom door was scratched and marred. There were 2 residents who resided in room and 4 residents shared the bathroom. b. room [ROOM NUMBER] - The wall the behind the bed was marred and gouged. There was 1 resident who resided in the room. c. room [ROOM NUMBER] - The door frame was marred by the closet and the cove base was loose in the entry way of the room. The walls in the bathroom were marred. There were 2 residents who resided in the room and shared the bathroom. d. room [ROOM NUMBER]- The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's dignity was maintained related to a cognitively impaired dependent resident being dressed in a hospital gown during the day for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dignity. (Resident 58) Finding includes: During random observations on 8/5/24 at 11:30 a.m. and 2:55 p.m., on 8/6/24 at 9:58 a.m.,1:00 p.m., 1:45 p.m., and 2:24 p.m., and on 8/7/24 at 10:30 a.m., Resident 58 was observed in bed wearing a hospital gown. The record for Resident 58 was reviewed on 8/6/24 at 1:20 p.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, obesity, dysphagia, type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, heart disease, peg tube (a tube inserted directly into the stomach for nutrition), restlessness and agitation. The 7/9/24 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. The resident did not participate in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) related to the cleaning and cutting of fingernails, oral care, and getting out of bed for 2 of 10 residents reviewed for ADL's. (Residents 45 and 58) Findings include: 1. During random observations on 8/5/24 at 10:25 a.m., on 8/6/24 at 2:45 p.m., and on 8/7/24 at 10:15 a.m., Resident 45 was observed in bed with long and dirty fingernails. During an interview on 8/5/24 at 10:25 a.m., the resident stated I need nail care really bad. The record for Resident 45 was reviewed on 8/7/24 at 11:20 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, infarction of the spinal cord, heart disease, high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, urine retention, and neuromuscular of the bladder. The 5/30/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a personalized activity program for cognitively impaired and dependent residents related to ongoing stimulation and being invited to activities for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for activities. (Residents 24 and 58) Findings include: 1. On 8/6/24 at 12:58 p.m., 2:10 p.m., and 3:03 p.m., Resident 24 was observed in his room in bed. The resident's eyes were closed and no television or radio were present in the resident's room. On 8/7/24 at 9:05 a.m., 10:05 a.m., 11:39 a.m., and 1:28 p.m., the resident was observed in his room in bed. His eyes were closed and there was no television or radio present in his room. On 8/8/24 at 11:00 a.m. and 1:10 p.m., the resident was observed in his room in bed. His eyes were closed and there was no television or radio present in his room. On 8/9/24 at 8:47 a.m., the resident was observed in his room in bed. His eyes were closed and there was no television or radio present in his room. The record for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure areas of discoloration and treatments for non-pressure areas were completed and/or ordered for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions (Residents 13 and 57) Findings include: 1. During a random observation on 8/5/24 at 2:40 p.m., Resident 13 was observed in bed. At that time, her feet were very dry and flaky with peeling skin. The resident had an open area on her right ring finger that was uncovered. During an interview at that time, the resident indicated the treatment to the finger was last done on Friday 8/2/24, and it was done every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. She indicated staff did not put any special lotion on her feet. During an interview on 8/7/24 at 1:50 p.m., the resident indicated she had seen the wound physician today and the treatment to her finger was not completed yesterday (8/6/24). The record for Resident 13 was reviewed on 8/7/24 at 2:30 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure glasses were received as ordered and a follow up audiology (a physician who treats hearing issues) appointment was completed for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for vision and hearing. (Residents 2, 45, and 34) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 8/5/24 at 1:32 p.m., Resident 2 indicated he needed new glasses and he had told the staff. The resident was not wearing glasses at the time of the interview. The record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 8/9/24 at 9:00 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes and end stage renal disease. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/11/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident was identified as having adequate vision with corrective lenses. A Care Plan, dated 9/7/21 and reviewed on 6/17/24, indicated the resident's vision was adequate with the use of glasses, which he utilized mainly for reading. Interventions included, but were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a pressure sore received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing related to providing a treatment as ordered by the physician for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 58) Finding includes: During a random observation on 8/6/24 at 2:24 p.m., CNA 1 and CNA 3 were observed in Resident 58's room. At that time, they were asked to reposition the resident onto his left side so the bandage on the pressure ulcer could be observed. CNA 3 removed the resident's bed linens and the peg tube was disconnected from the enteral feeding as there was feeding all over his gown. CNA 1 left the room to get the nurse to reconnect the tube feeding. Once CNA 1 was back, accompanied by LPN 2, they rolled the resident over and removed his brief. At that time, there was no bandage covering the pressure ulcer. The resident had several ulcers observed on his buttocks and sacral area. The areas were pink, red…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a suprapubic foley (urinary) catheter received foley catheter care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for catheters. (Resident 45) Finding includes: During a random observation on 8/5/24 at 10:31 a.m., Resident 45 was observed in bed. At that time, the resident was asked to lift his gown so his the stoma for his suprapubic catheter could be seen. The bandage around the stoma was dated 8/2/24 and had dried brown blood on it. The record for Resident 45 was reviewed on 8/7/24 at 11:20 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, infarction of the spinal cord, heart disease, high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, urine retention, and neuromuscular of the bladder. The 5/30/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and needed partial to moderate assistance with personal hygiene. The resident had a suprapubic catheter. A Care Plan, revised on 7/9/24, indicated the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was positioned upright at least 45 degrees while an enteral feeding was infusing into a peg tube (a tube inserted directly into the stomach to provide nutrition) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tube feeding. (Resident 58) Finding includes: During a random observation on 8/6/24 at 2:24 p.m., CNA 1 and CNA 3 were observed in Resident 58's room. At that time, they were asked to reposition the resident onto his left side so the bandage on the pressure ulcer could be observed. CNA 3 took the bed remote and started to lower the resident's head of the bed to 5 degrees. At that time, she was asked to stop due since the enteral tube feeding was currently infusing into the peg tube. The CNA stated You are absolutely right. Can I put the peg tube on hold? She was asked if she was allowed to do that and the CNA stated Yes, the nurses let us do that all the time. The CNA walked over to the enteral feeding pump and put the feeding on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was set at the correct flow rate for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 13) Finding includes: During random observations on 8/5/24 at 10:40 a.m. and 2:41 p.m., and on 8/6/24 at 10:00 a.m., Resident 13 was observed in bed wearing oxygen per nasal cannula at 1.5 liters. The record for Resident 13 was reviewed on 8/7/24 at 2:30 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, chronic kidney disease, heart disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and anxiety disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/12/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident did not wear oxygen. A Care Plan, revised on 4/12/24, indicated the resident had complications of shortness of breath when lying flat in bed. The approaches were to encourage the use of supplemental oxygen at 2 liters. A Care Plan, revised on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to establish and/or maintain a system that accounted for, periodically reconciled, and ensured the disposition of all controlled drugs, related to inaccurate documentation of narcotic medications for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for narcotics. (Resident 33) Finding includes: On 8/5/23 at 11:18 a.m., an investigation of a narcotic diversion regarding a previously employed nurse was reviewed. The file folder was full of old narcotic sheets from a resident for whom the narcotic diversion was suspected. During the investigation, there was a discrepancy noted earlier on the narcotic log than what was reported on 7/31/24. The record for Resident 33 was reviewed on 8/07/24 at 3:16 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), stage 4 sacral wound, anemia, anxiety, hypertension (high blood pressure), depression, and colostomy status. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/8/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident used hospice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to appropriately monitor blood pressures (BP) related to medications with BP parameters for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 58) Finding includes: The record for Resident 58 was reviewed on 8/6/24 at 1:20 p.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, obesity, dysphagia, type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, heart disease, peg tube (a tube inserted directly into the stomach for nutrition), restlessness and agitation. The 7/9/24 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. The resident was dependent on staff to roll to the right and the left, transfer out of bed, personal hygiene and oral care. Physician's Orders, dated 7/20/24, indicated Hydralazine (a medication used to lower the blood pressure) 50 milligrams (mg), 1 tablet three times a day and hold for systolic blood pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an adequate indication for the use of an antipsychotic medication was documented in the clinical record for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. (Resident 5) Finding includes: The record for Resident 57 was reviewed on 8/8/24 at 8:40 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease (dementia), high blood pressure, anemia, and osteoarthritis. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Modification of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/23/24, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making and had the behavior of wandering which occurred 4 to 6 times during the reference period. The resident received an antipsychotic medication which was scheduled and no gradual dose reduction (GDR) had been attempted. A Care Plan, dated 5/21/24, indicated the resident received an antipsychotic medication for behavior management. A Nurses' Note, dated 5/17/24 at 8:57…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received routine dental services related to decayed and broken teeth for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dental services. (Resident 45) Finding includes: During an interview on 8/5/24 at 10:28 a.m., Resident 45 indicated he had seen the dentist about 5 months ago, and the dentist indicated they were going to pull his teeth as they were bad, but he has heard nothing more of it. Resident 45 indicated it was hard to eat with his teeth as they were brittle. During an observation at that time, the resident had obvious broken, loose and decayed teeth. The record for Resident 45 was reviewed on 8/7/24 at 11:20 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, infarction of the spinal cord, heart disease, high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, urine retention, and neuromuscular of the bladder. The 5/30/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and needed partial to moderate assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form to meet individual needs related to not following the pureed recipe. This had the potential to affect 2 residents who received a pureed diet. (Cook 1) On 8/7/24 at 11:37 a.m., a pureed demonstration of barbeque chicken was observed with [NAME] 1. The pureed barbeque chicken was precooked and 2 servings were measured out from the mechanical barbeque chicken mixture and added to the blender. There were no additional ingredients that were added to the mixture. The barbeque chicken puree was pudding thick, and the mixture was even with no clumps. [NAME] 1 measured out 2 servings and placed them in 2 serving bowls. On 8/7/24 at 11:45 a.m., [NAME] 1 measured out 2 servings of precooked broccoli and added to the blender. There were no additional ingredients added to the mixture. The consistency was even with no lumps or clumps. [NAME] 1 then measured out 2 servings and placed them in 2 serving bowls. During an interview on 8/7/24 at 11:37 a.m., [NAME] 1 indicated she did not use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented related to documentation of a dialysis access site for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident 2) and the correct medication administration route for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 58). Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 2 was reviewed on 8/9/24 at 9:00 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes and end stage renal disease. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/11/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident was receiving dialysis services. A Care Plan, reviewed on 6/17/24, indicated the resident had a right permacath (a flexible, soft plastic tube used for short term dialysis treatment) in place. Interventions included, but were not limited to, keep catheter site clean and dry, observe for redness, swelling, any discharge, increased pain or warmth due to infection. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify unresolved quality deficiencies, which had been cited on previous surveys, and ensure actions were developed and implemented to attempt to correct the deficiencies through the quality assessment and assurance (QAA) process, as evidenced by the number of repeated deficiencies cited for pest control related to gnats in resident rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 60 of 60 residents residing in the facility. Finding includes: During an interview on 8/9/24 at 11:30 a.m., the Administrator indicated the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee had a meeting on 7/18/24 and the committee consisted of the Medical Director, the Administrator, the Director of Nursing (DON), the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, the Food Sanitation Supervisor, the Social Service Director, the Activity Director, Housekeeping and Maintenance Directors. The committee met on the third Thursday of the month. The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was free of pests related to gnats for 1 of 1 residents observed with gnats in their room. (Resident 33) Finding includes: On 8/5/24 at 10:12 a.m., Resident 33 was observed lying in bed with gnats flying in the room and landing on her bed linen and right lower leg wound dressing. On 8/5/24 at 11:04 a.m., the Wound Nurse was observed entering the resident's room and attempting to complete wound care. There were gnats observed in the air, on the resident's gown, and on the wound dressing. The wound nurse removed several layers of the bandages and several gnats were observed inside the bandages and on the resident's open ulcerations to the right lower leg. During an interview at that time, the Wound Nurse indicated they were attempting to get rid of the gnats and had put a work order in for treatment. There were gnat strips hanging in the room, and she was aware the gnats were flying on and around the wound during the treatment. The Wound Nurse indicated the Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were care planned for a resident with a history of falls for 1 of 5 care plans reviewed. (Resident E) Finding includes: During an observation on 6/19/24 at 9:54 a.m., Resident E was observed in bed. The bed was in low position and there was a mat on the floor next to him. During observations on 6/20/24 at 9:05 and 9:55, the resident was observed in bed in the low position with a mat on the floor next to him. The resident's record was reviewed on 6/20/24 at 9:40 a.m. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Diabetes Mellitus and hypertension. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment was in progress. The Brief Interview for Mental Status, dated 6/12/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The Baseline Care Plan, dated 6/7/24, indicated the resident was two person assist for bed mobility. A Post Fall Observation, dated 6/8/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident received the necessary care and services related to lack of blood glucose parameters in place and Physician notification of elevated blood glucose levels for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for diabetic care. (Resident B) Finding includes: Resident B's record was reviewed on 6/19/24 at 1:45 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Diabetes Mellitus, heart failure and hypertension. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 4/12/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and received insulin. Current Physician Orders indicated the resident was to receive Insulin lispro, 8 units, three times a day and Lantus (long acting insulin) 20 units at bedtime. There were no parameters in place when to notify the Physician of low or high blood glucose levels. A Progress Note, dated 5/31/24, indicated the resident's blood glucose level was 422 (milligrams per deciliter). The resident received an additional 8 units of lispro. A Progress Note, dated 6/10/24, indicated the resident's blood glucose level was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure treatment orders were obtained timely for a newly developed pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident B) Finding includes: The closed record for Resident B was reviewed on 1/25/24 at 9:22 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, type 2 diabetes, adult failure to thrive, anorexia, and dementia without behavior disturbance. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/26/23, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired for daily decision making. They required extensive assistance with bed mobility and were totally dependent on staff for transfers. No pressure ulcers were noted during the assessment reference period. A Care Plan, dated 9/20/23 and revised on 9/26/23, indicated the resident had impaired skin integrity to the left heel related to immobility. Interventions included, but were not limited to, administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. A Change in Condition Evaluation, dated 9/20/23 at 2:39 p.m., indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received the necessary care and services to treat and improve the wounds related to the lack of documentation and obtaining orders for the treatment of pressure ulcers and following the dietician's recommendations for healing for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Residents E and B) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident E was reviewed on 9/13/23 at 3:30 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to acute spinal cord infarction, chronic ischemic heart disease, high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, panic disorder, stroke with no residual, and coronary artery bypass graft. The 8/30/23 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and had 1 Stage 4 pressure ulcer. The Care Plan, revised on 7/26/23, indicated the resident was at risk for impaired skin integrity and the current area of impairment included the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-07-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions related to built up grease on the stove top, open food containers, and uncovered food in the freezer for 1 of 1 kitchens observed. This had the potential to affect the 64 residents who received food from the kitchen. (The Main Kitchen) Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour on 7/24/23 at 8:50 a.m., with the Dietary Manager, the following was observed: a. The stove top and fire irons had a build up of grease. b. The dry food storage area had an open container of dry oats on the floor and an open container of grape jelly on the counter. c. The freezer had a block of cheese uncovered sitting on the counter. Interview with the Dietary Food Manager on 7/24/23 at 9:00 a.m., indicated the stove should have been cleaned and the food items in the dry storage and freezer should not have been left open. 3.1-21(i)(3)
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify unresolved quality deficiencies, some of which had been cited on previous surveys, and ensure actions were developed and implemented to attempt to correct the deficiencies through the quality assessment and assurance (QAA) process, as evidenced by the number of repeated deficiencies cited for quality of care related to follow up documentation and assessment after a fall. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 64 of 64 residents residing in the facility. Finding includes: Interview with the Administrator in Training (AIT) and the Medical Record/Human Resource Director on 7/28/23 at 12:45 p.m., indicated the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee had a meeting on 7/11/23 and the committee consisted of the Medical Director, the Administrator, the DON, Infection Control Nurse, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse, the Food Sanitation Supervisor, the Social Service Director, the Activity Director and Maintenance. The Department Heads also met on a monthly basis. The Quality Assurance and Performance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide documentation of care conferences held with the resident or resident's family and facility staff for 7 of 7 residents reviewed for care planning decisions. (Residents 60, 12, 46, 52, 18, 16, and 10) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 7/24/23 at 9:59 a.m., Resident 60 indicated he had not been invited or attended a care conference with facility staff since he had been living at the facility. The record for Resident 60 was reviewed on 7/26/23 at 9:40 a.m. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to acute spinal cord infarction, chronic ischemic heart disease, high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, panic disorder, stroke with no residual, and coronary artery bypass graft. The 5/30/23 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. There was no documentation of a care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment, as well as the kitchen area, was clean and in good repair related to dirty floors, marred walls, loose baseboards and lime build up in for 1 of 2 floors and the Main Kitchen. (Second Floor and the Main Kitchen) Findings include: 1. During the Environmental tour with the Environmental Manager on 7/27/23 at 2:54 p.m., the following was observed: Second Floor: a. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the walls were marred behind and on the sides of beds one and two. Two residents resided in the room. b. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the walls outside of the bathroom door were marred. Two residents resided in the room. c. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the walls behind the bed were marred. The headboard was missing on bed one. Two residents resided in the room. Interview with the Environmental Manager at that time indicated that he was working on getting all areas together. 2. During the follow up tour in the kitchen on 7/23/23 at 3:18 p.m. with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's preference was honored for the number of medications received for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for choices. (Resident C) Finding includes: On 7/24/23 at 10:08 a.m., Resident C was observed sitting up in bed and indicated she had asked the nurses numerous times to spread out her medications because she takes too many pills at one time. The record for Resident C was reviewed on 7/25/23 at 9:44 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), hemiplegia left side (left side paralysis), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), seizure disorder, acid reflux, and overactive bladder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/6/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A Care Plan, dated 6/6/23, indicated the resident had a behavior of being non-compliant with medication. Approaches included, nursing to educate resident on any medications that she may not be familiar with or any new medications prescribed, resident would vocalize…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate documentation, such as a discharge summary, was completed prior to transferring a resident to the hospital for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident D). Finding includes: Resident D's record was reviewed on 7/26/23 at 9:15 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 2/24/23. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, one sided weakness/paralysis affecting the right dominant side following a stroke, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and bipolar disorder. The Discharge - Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/24/23, indicated the resident had a memory problem and required modified independence for daily decision making. She required extensive assistance with one person physical assist for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. She was totally dependent with one person physical assist for bathing. A Progress Note, dated 2/24/2023 at 7:45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Care Plan was developed for a resident who had a new Schizophrenia diagnosis for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for Care Plan development. (Resident 10) Finding includes: Resident 10's record was reviewed on 7/27/23 at 2:43 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypotensive (low blood pressure), depression, bipolar, schizophrenia, restlessness and agitation, and stroke. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/4/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/28/22, was completed after emergency detention stay at the hospital. The After-Visit Summary from the hospital, dated 11/21/22, indicated the resident was started on an antipsychotic medication Seroquel (Quetiapine Fumarate) for Schizophrenia. A Physician's Order, dated 11/22/22, indicated Quetiapine Fumarate (Antipsychotic) tablet 50 mg one time a day. A Physician's Order, dated 5/11/23, indicated Quetiapine Fumarate (Antipsychotic) tablet 150 mg every evening. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure documentation of discharge planning was completed for 1 of 1 closed records reviewed for discharge. (Resident 70) Finding includes: The closed record for Resident 70 was reviewed on 7/28/23 at 10:34 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, hypertensive encephalopathy, high blood pressure, gastrostomy, anemia, stroke and hemiplegia on the right side. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/16/23, indicated the resident was alert and oriented. There was no documentation related to the resident's discharge in the clinical record. Interview with the Nurse Consultant on 7/28/23 at 12:44 p.m., indicated she was not able to locate the discharge instructions. A facility policy, titled Discharge Planning, received from the Nurse Consultant as current, indicated, .6. The facility will involve the resident and resident representative in the development of the discharge plan and inform the resident and resident representative of the final goal. 7. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete the recapitulation of the resident's stay prior to discharge for 1 of 1 closed records reviewed for discharge. (Resident 70) Finding includes: The closed record for Resident 70 was reviewed on 7/28/23 at 10:34 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, hypertensive encephalopathy, high blood pressure, gastrostomy, anemia, stroke and hemiplegia on the right side. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/16/23, indicated the resident was alert and oriented There was no documentation related to the recapitulation of stay for the resident prior to discharge. Interview with the Nurse Consultant on 7/28/23 at 12:44 p.m., indicated she was not able to locate the recapitulation of the resident's stay at the facility. A facility policy, titled Discharge Planning, received from the Nurse Consultant as current, indicated, .13. Document, completed on a timely basis based on the resident's needs, and include in the clinical record, the evaluation of the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to receive services for impaired vision for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for vision and hearing. (Resident 60) Finding includes: During an interview with Resident 60 on 7/24/23 at 10:02 a.m., he indicated he had complaints of not being able to see very well. His eyes were bad and he had told staff he wanted to see the eye doctor, but had not seen one since admission. The record for Resident 60 was reviewed on 7/26/23 at 9:40 a.m. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to acute spinal cord infarction, chronic ischemic heart disease, high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, panic disorder, stroke with no residual, and coronary artery bypass graft. The 5/30/23 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and no vision impairment or corrective lens. There was no Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a Stage 4 pressure ulcer received the necessary care and services to treat and improve the wound related to not providing a wound vac in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 60) Finding includes: On 7/27/23 at 9:06 a.m. the Wound Nurse was observed changing Resident 60's bandage to his pressure ulcer on the sacrum. After the bandage was removed, the wound bed was pink with some slough (necrotic tissue) and undermining (tunneling). The record for Resident 60 was reviewed on 7/26/23 at 9:40 a.m. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to acute spinal cord infarction, chronic ischemic heart disease, high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, panic disorder, stroke with no residual, and coronary artery bypass graft. The 5/30/23 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure splints were applied as ordered for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM). (Resident 46) Finding includes: On 7/24/23 at 10:56 a.m., Resident 46 indicated he was in need of therapy for his left side and did not wear any type of splinting devices. There was no splinting device noted to his left hand/wrist at the time of interview. On 7/27/23 at 11:26 a.m., Resident 46 was observed in bed with no splint noted to his left hand/wrist. On 7/28/23 at 10:38 a.m., Resident 46 was observed in bed with no splint noted to his left hand/wrist. He indicated he never wore one and no one ever offered to help him put one on. Resident 46's record was reviewed on 7/26/23 at 9:43 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, left-sided weakness/paralysis following a stroke and lack of coordination. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/30/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. He required extensive assistance with two persons physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a history of falls had fall interventions in place to prevent further injury related to not wearing non-skid socks for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident E) Finding includes: On 7/24/23 at 10:00 a.m., Resident E was observed in bed with her eyes closed. At that time, she was wearing plain white socks to both of her feet. On 07/25/23 8:33 a.m., and 8:50 a.m., the resident was observed in bed. At that time, she was wearing plain white socks. The record for Resident E was reviewed on 7/27/23 at 10:00 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes, diabetic neuropathy, high blood pressure, anxiety disorder, heart failure, and convulsions. The 6/22/23 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, indicated the resident was not cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident needed extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with complex urinary tract infections were seen by the urologist and residents with suprapubic (inserted through the abdomen) foley (urinary) catheters had them changed on a monthly basis for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for catheters. (Residents 60 and 2) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 7/24/23 at 10:05 a.m., Resident 60 indicated staff did not perform catheter care for him every shift or every day. At that time, he was observed with an indwelling foley catheter. The record for Resident 60 was reviewed on 7/26/23 at 9:40 a.m. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to acute spinal cord infarction, chronic ischemic heart disease, high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, panic disorder, stroke with no residual, and coronary artery bypass graft. The resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] returning on 2/21/23, on 4/22/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status related to meal consumption records not completed and dietary supplements not given to the resident for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 60) Finding includes: During an interview on 7/24/23 at 10:01 a.m., Resident 60 indicated he was supposed to get Glucerna or something like that, however, he had not received it in a long time. The Registered Dietitian (RD) told him he was supposed to receive it. The record for Resident 60 was reviewed on 7/26/23 at 9:40 a.m. The resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to acute spinal cord infarction, chronic ischemic heart disease, high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, panic disorder, stroke with no residual, and coronary artery bypass graft. The 5/30/23 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure lung sounds were assessed prior to administering nebulizer treatments and staff remained with the resident during the treatment for 1 of 1 nebulizer treatments observed. (Resident 271) Finding includes: On 7/27/23 at 9:46 a.m., LPN 2 was preparing to administer an Ipratropium-Albuterol nebulizer treatment to Resident 271. The LPN placed the vial of solution in the nebulizer canister and placed the mask over the resident's face. She did not assess his lung sounds prior to administering the treatment. The LPN indicated she would return to the resident's room in about 15 minutes to remove the mask once the nebulizer treatment was completed. The record for Resident 271 was reviewed on 7/27/23 at 3:48 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, shortness of breath, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and stroke. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/26/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A Physician's Order, dated 7/19/23, indicated the resident was to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication with the dialysis center was completed with each dialysis session for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dialysis. (Resident 12) Finding includes: Resident 12's record was reviewed on 7/26/23 at 11:29 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/27/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. He received insulin injections and dialysis treatments. A Care Plan, dated 7/24/23, indicated the resident was at risk for adverse effects related to end stage renal disease with dependence on hemodialysis. Interventions included, but were not limited to, check and change dressing daily at access site and encourage resident to go for the scheduled dialysis appointments on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday each week. The Dialysis Communication binder included communication forms that had information for the facility to fill out prior to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were managed appropriately related to missed insulin doses and medication not held as ordered for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 12). Finding includes: The record for Resident 12 was reviewed on 7/26/23 at 11:29 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/27/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident received insulin injections and dialysis treatments. A Care Plan, dated 7/24/23, indicated the resident was at risk for adverse effects related to end stage renal disease with dependence on hemodialysis. Interventions included, but were not limited to, check and change dressing daily at access site and encourage resident to go for the scheduled dialysis appointments on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday each week. A Physician's Order, dated 4/6/22, indicated amlodipine (blood pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive unnecessary medications related to PRN (as needed) anti-anxiety medication only administered after non-pharmaceutical interventions were attempted for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident E) Finding includes: The record for Resident E was reviewed on 7/27/23 at 10:00 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes, diabetic neuropathy, high blood pressure, anxiety disorder, heart failure, and convulsions. The 6/22/23 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was not cognitively intact for daily decision making. In the last 7 days, the resident had received an antipsychotic medication 7 times and an antidepressant 7 times. Physician's Orders, dated 6/26/23 and discontinued on 7/13/23, indicated Ativan tablet 0.5 milligrams (mg), give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% for 2 of 5 residents observed during medication pass. Three errors were observed during 30 opportunities for errors during medication administration. This resulted in a medication error rate of 10%. (Residents 34 and 5) Findings include: 1. During observation of medication administration on 7/25/23 at 9:26 a.m., LPN 4 was preparing Resident 34's medications. She dispensed one Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) 25 milligram (mg) tablet in the med cup. She then proceeded to dispense one Zoloft (an antidepressant) 100 mg tablet in the med cup. The resident also received one Norco (a narcotic pain medication) and one Xanax (an anti-anxiety medication). There were a total of 4 pills in the medication cup. The LPN proceeded to the resident's room to administer the medications. The record for Resident 34 was reviewed on 7/25/23 at 10:30 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. A Physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and stored correctly for 1 of 5 residents observed during medication administration. (Resident 5) Finding includes: Observation of medication pass on 7/26/23 at 4:05 p.m., with RN 1, indicated Resident 5's insulin pen was on top of the medication cart. The RN entered the resident's room to check her blood sugar. He closed the door behind him and the medication cart was out of his view. At 4:27 p.m., the RN administered the resident's oral medications. The insulin pen remained on top of the medication cart. The medication cart remained out of the RN's view while he administered the medications. At 5:28 p.m., the RN was preparing to administer the resident's insulin. The insulin pen had remained on top of the medication cart. The RN indicated the resident was to receive 30 units of Humalog (fast acting) insulin based on the order. The label on the insulin pen indicated the resident was to receive 20 units. The RN proceeded to the medication room to look for another insulin pen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record was complete and accurate related to dialysis fistula monitoring for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dialysis. (Resident 12) Finding includes: Resident 12's record was reviewed on 7/26/23 at 11:29 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/27/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. He received insulin injections and dialysis treatments. A Care Plan, dated 7/24/23, indicated the resident was at risk for adverse effects related to end stage renal disease with dependence on hemodialysis. Interventions included, but were not limited to, check and change dressing daily at access site and encourage resident to go for the scheduled dialysis appointments on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday each week. A Physician's Order, dated 8/25/21, indicated assess dialysis access site for redness, swelling, pain, drainage and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free from pests related to live gnats and flies for 2 of 2 residents observed with gnats in their rooms. (Residents G and F) Finding includes: During the survey period, 7/24/23 through 7/28/23, the following was observed: During a random observation on 7/24/23 at 10:44 a.m., Resident G was observed lying in bed. He indicated he had a problem with flies, and he wanted a fly sticker since he can't use his hands due to being a paraplegic. There were flies observed flying around the resident's face. During a random observation on 7/26/23 at 9:39 a.m., Resident F was observed lying in bed with a sheet over her legs. There were several gnats on her bed sheet and a couple were flying around the resident's head. There were 2 residents who resided in the room. During a random observation on 7/26/23 2:46 p.m., Resident F was observed asleep in bed. A sheet covered the resident and there were 3 gnats on the sheet by the residents legs. There were 2 residents in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-07-28 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or visitors could access the survey inspection results without having to ask. This had the potential to affect 64 of the 64 residents who resided in the facility. Finding includes: During the Resident Council Meeting on 7/27/23 at 2:00 p.m., the 10 residents in attendance were not able to indicate where the survey inspection results were located. After the meeting, there was no signage in the lobby area indicating where the survey inspection results were located. The survey book was also not observed in the area. On 7/27/23 at 3:10 p.m., the Administrator in Training was not able to locate the survey book. At 3:35 p.m., she indicated she had found the survey book and a sign would be posted with its location and the residents would be informed. 3.1-3(b)(1)
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$13,637 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $13,637 — penalty dated 2024-08-09
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CASA CONSULTING — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLAXTON, RYAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/27/2025 |
| CASA CONSULTING, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2013 |
| MAJOR HOSPITAL | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2013 |
| KNIGHTS, DILANE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| OYEGBADE, ADEYEMI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| SIEGAL, MOSHE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2013 |
| KURTZ, ELISHEVA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/25/2025 |
| ROTHNER, DANIEL | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/16/2025 |
| ROTHNER, ERIC | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/05/2025 |
| ROTHNER, WILLIAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/16/2025 |
| RUDOLPH, KIMBERLY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/16/2025 |
| VALES, ADAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/16/2025 |
| EAST LAKE HEALTH CARE PROPERTIES, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2013 |
| HARBOR HC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2023 |
| BALLARD, VICTOR | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| BOLER, ALISHA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| BRODEN, SANJUANA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/14/1968 |
| CLARK, LATOYA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2022 |
| EVANS, CYNTHIA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| GONZALEZ, DEANGELO | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| PERKINS, LATOI | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2019 |
| URRA, MYRA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155653. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.