Legacy Nursing and Rehabilitation of Morgan City

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 39.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 80.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-08-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal and mental abuse by another resident for 1 (Resident #30) of 3 (Resident #15, Resident #30, Resident #33) sampled residents investigated for abuse. This deficient practice resulted in an actual harm on 07/06/2025 at approximately 9:30PM, when Resident #15, a resident with known aggressive behaviors towards staff and other residents, was overheard by her roommate, Resident #30, during a telephone conversation where Resident #15 used racial slurs so loudly that Resident #30 overheard the conversation. On 07/07/2025 at approximately 2:30PM, Resident #30 was observed by staff crying. Resident #30 informed S9Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) of the conversation that was overheard on 07/06/2025 when Resident #15 used racial slurs. Resident #15 who was in the room during the conversation reacted to S9CNA and Resident #30 by using racial slurs, cursing, and kicking the trash can. Resident #30…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were supervised and kept free from thermal burns for 2 (Resident #19 and Resident #49) of 2 (Resident #19 and Resident #49) sampled residents investigated for an accident/hazard related to burns. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm when on 02/04/2024 for Resident #49 and on 02/21/2024 for Resident #19, when Resident #19 and Residnet #49 were left unsupervised and sustained first degree superficial burns from spilled coffee. Findings: Review of Appendix PP of the State Operations Manual, last revised on 08/08/2024, revealed, in part, third degree burns can occur within 1 to 2 seconds with hot water temperatures between 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 155 degrees F. Review of the National Library of Medicine's Burn Evaluation and Management article, last revised on 08/08/2023, revealed, in part, burns may be caused by hot liquids. Further review revealed superficial burns (first degree) are red on the skin. Resident #19 Review of Resident #19's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, in part,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record was complete for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living documentation. Findings:Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 10/22/2025 revealed, in part, Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 (a score of 13-15 indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact). Further review revealed Resident #1 was dependent on staff for toileting, showering, and bathing. Review of Resident #1's care plan revealed Resident #1 required staff assistance for all activities of daily living with a goal date of 02/06/2026 with approaches that included, in part, certified nursing assistant (CNA) staff were to assist Resident #1 with hygiene and grooming tasks as needed. Further review of Resident #1's care plan revealed Resident #1 refused showers at times with a goal date of 02/06/2026 with approaches that included, in part, allow Resident #1 opportunities to make choices and participate in care.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to:1. Ensure expired medications were not available for resident use (Medication Cart A);2. Ensure the facility's shift verification of controlled substances count sheet was completed every shift (Medication Cart A); and,3. Ensure medications were documented as administered on the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) when administered (Resident #83).This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Medication Cart A) of 2 (Medication Cart A, Medication Cart B) sampled medication carts observed during medication storage observations and 1 (Resident #83) of 1 (Resident #83) sampled residents investigated for hospice. Findings:1. Review of the facility's undated Storage of Medications policy and procedure revealed, in part, no discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated medications were available for use in the facility. Further review revealed all discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated medications were to be destroyed. Observation of Medication Cart A on 08/06/2025 at 3:30PM revealed, in part: -Advair…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to:1. Ensure the scoop used to serve ice did not have the handle submerged in the residents' ice (Ice Chest A); 2. Ensure staff properly handled soiled linen (S12Certified Nursing Assistant); and, 3. Ensure staff implemented Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident (Resident #76). This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Ice Chest A) of 2 (Ice Chest A, Ice Chest B) ice chests used to provide ice to residents; 1 (S12CNA) of 1 (S12CNA) CNAs observed during random linen handling observations; and, 1 (Resident #76) of 12 (Resident #5, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #17, Resident #32, Resident #70, Resident #76, Resident #77, Resident #81, Resident #85, Resident #90, Resident #91) sampled residents observed on EBP. Findings: 1.Observation on 08/04/2025 at 8:46AM revealed a blue and white ice chest located in the dining room with the ice scoop handle submerged in water and ice. In an interview on 08/04/2025 at 8:55AM, S2Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the ice scoop handle was inside the ice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal and mental abuse to the state agency for 1 (Resident #30) of 3 (Resident #15, Resident #30, Resident #33) sampled residents reviewed for abuse.Findings:Cross Reference F600Review of the facility's undated Abuse Prevention and Prohibition policy revealed, in part, each resident had the right to be free from abuse and should not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including other residents. Further review revealed verbal abuse was defined as the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully included disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance or sight, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Further review revealed staff should immediately report their knowledge related to abuse allegations to the Administrator or DON without fear of reprisal. Further review revealed an alleged violation of abuse will be reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours if the alleged violation involved abuse or had resulted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to have documented evidence a thorough investigation was completed following allegations of verbal and mental abuse for 1 (Resident #30) of 3 (Resident #15, Resident #30, Resident #33) sampled residents investigated for abuse. Findings:Cross Reference F600 Review of the facility's undated Abuse Prevention and Prohibition policy revealed, in part, each resident had the right to be free from abuse and should not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including other residents. Further review revealed abuse was defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Further review revealed verbal abuse was defined as the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully included disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance or sight, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Review revealed an abuse investigation included interviewing employees who worked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement interventions for residents who were identified at risk for falls for 2 (Resident #3, Resident #7) of 8 (Resident #3, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #12, Resident #16, Resident #17, Resident #30, Resident #73) sampled residents investigated for accidents.Findings:Resident #3: Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/30/2025 revealed, in part, a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 4. A score of 4 which indicated Resident #3 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #3's electronic medical record (EMR) chart revealed, in part, a special instruction for Resident #3 to have an auto lock brakes feature. (An auto lock brake feature engages the wheelchair's brakes when the user's weight is removed from the seat, preventing the chair from rolling away unintentionally). Review of Resident #3's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed, in part, a score of 55 (A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to:1. Follow a physician's order for oxygen administration (Resident #33, Resident #63); and, 2. Ensure oxygen tubing was changed and dated weekly (Resident #33, Resident #63). This deficient practice was identified for 2 (Resident #33, Resident #63) of 2 (Resident #33, Resident #63) sampled residents investigated for respiratory care. Findings:1.Review of the facility's undated Oxygen Administration policy and procedure revealed, in part, staff should check the physician's order for liter flow rate of oxygen and method of administration. Further review revealed staff should adjust the liter flow rate of oxygen to the rate ordered by the physician. Resident #33Review of Resident #33's August 2025 Physician Orders revealed, in part, an order dated 09/29/2023 for oxygen to be administered at 2 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula continuously related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe). Review of Resident #33's care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. ensure food stored in the facility's refrigerator was labeled with an opened date and/or discarded prior to the item's expiration date; and,2. ensure scoops were not stored inside the dry goods storage bins. Findings:1.Review of the facility's undated Food Safety and Sanitation policy and procedure revealed, in part, leftovers were to be dated when stored, and foods with expiration dates were to be used prior to the use by date on the package. Observation on 08/04/2025 at 8:30AM of the facility's kitchen with S14Dietary Manager revealed an opened gallon size container of ranch dressing stored in the facility's refrigerator. Further review revealed the container of ranch dressing had not been labeled with an opened date and had an expiration date of 07/24/2025. In an interview on 08/04/2025 at 8:39AM, S14Dietary Manager confirmed the container of ranch dressing, as mentioned above, was not labeled with an opened date and had an expiration date of 07/24/2025. S14Dietary Manager indicated the opened…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the required number of nursing staff members were present and working in the facility for 22 (10/19/2024, 10/20/2024, 10/26/2024, 10/27/2024, 11/02/2024, 11/03/2024, 11/10/2024, 11/16/2024, 02/16/2025, 02/18/2025, 02/22/2025, 02/23/2025, 02/24/2025, 03/01/2025, 03/02/2025, 03/03/2025, 03/04/2025, 03/05/2025, 03/07/2025, 03/08/2025, 03/09/2025, 03/13/2025) of 53 (10/05/2024, 10/06/2024, 10/12/2024, 10/13/2024, 10/19/2024, 10/20/2024, 10/26/2024, 10/27/2024, 11/02/2024, 11/03/2024, 11/09/2024, 11/10/2024, 11/16/2024, 11/17/2024, 11/23/2024, 11/24/2024, 11/30/2024, 12/07/2024, 12/08/2024, 12/14/2024, 12/15/2024, 12/21/2024, 12/22/2024, 12/28/2024, 12/29/2024, 02/16/2025, 02/17/2025, 02/18/2025, 02/19/2025, 02/20/2025, 02/21/2025, 02/22/2025, 02/23/2025, 02/24/2025, 02/25/2025, 02/26/2025, 02/27/2025, 02/28/2025, 03/01/2025, 03/02/2025, 03/03/2025, 03/04/2025, 03/05/2025, 03/06/2025, 03/07/2025, 03/08/2025, 03/09/2025, 03/10/2025, 03/11/2025, 03/12/2025, 03/13/2025, 03/14/2025, 03/15/2025) days reviewed for sufficient…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0825 — isolated
  Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the required physical therapy services for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) residents investigated for rehabilitation services. Findings: Review of Resident #1's February and March 2025 physician's orders revealed, in part, an order dated 02/27/2025 for physical therapy (PT) to evaluate and treat Resident #1, five times per week for 8 weeks as indicated. Further review revealed an order dated 03/06/2025 for PT to evaluate and treat Resident #1 five times per week for 8 weeks as indicated. Review of Resident #1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed she did not receive physical therapy services between 02/27/2025 and 03/06/2025. In an interview on 04/01/2025 at 9:20AM, S2Director of Rehabilitation (DOR) indicated when a resident required PT the physical therapist would write orders for the resident to be evaluated and treated for PT services, then the resident's physician would sign those orders. S2DOR further indicated Resident #1 did not receive PT services…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$109,359 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

• $11,364 — penalty dated 2025-08-07
• $97,995 — penalty dated 2024-08-22
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-09 for 6 days
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-20 for 6 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LEGACY NURSING & REHABILITATION — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $444K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA