Legacy Nursing and Rehabilitation
2817 Kent Street, Bryan, TX 77802 · Government - Hospital district · 117 certified beds · (979) 776-7521 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,044 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-15)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.6% | 15.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.0% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.2% | 2.4% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.0% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.9% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.6% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.5% | 3.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.6% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.0% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 47.1% | 88.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.3% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.1% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.64 | 2.17 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.18 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 133 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 46% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.7%CMS range 28.7–47.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.9%CMS range 10.2–16.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 42.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 24.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 82.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 93.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 4.3–9.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 100.2 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.00 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed.The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 received sufficient supervision to avoid the right femur fracture and subsequent hospitalization on 01/11/26. This failure could place the residents at risk for accidents.Findings included:Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 01/15/26 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included unspecified fracture of left femur, aftercare following joint replacement surgery, presence of left artificial hip joint, dementia, iron deficiency, hypotension (low blood pressure) and pain.Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed her BIMS score was 01 indicating her cognition was severely impaired. The MDS also indicate Resident #1 needed moderate assistance to roll left and right, Sit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-07-09 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 10 of 89 days reviewed for RN coverage.The facility failed to ensure they had an RN on duty on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE].This failure placed residents at risk of missed nursing assessments, interventions, care, and treatment.Findings included:Review of the Nursing Master Schedule for the months of January, February, and [DATE] revealed zero hours worked by an RN on the week-end days of [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE].In an interview conducted on [DATE] at 4:05 PM, the HR Director reviewed the time sheets for the days that were in question. The HR Director stated that no RN clocked in on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE]. The HR Director stated the facility is expected to have an RN on all days. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that describes the services that are to be furnished to maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 of 9 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident #9, Resident #53 and Resident #99). 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's comprehensive care plan reflected a plan for her indwelling urinary catheter that included her physician ordered interventions dated 07/02/2026 Urethral catheter (20 Fr) with (30 cc) bulb. every shift Urinary catheter and catheter bag: Tubing secure; Check for placement of dignity cover; Ensure bag is below the level of the bladder; Ensure bag is not touching or dragging the floor/ground. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #53's Comprehensive Care Plan reflected a plan for indwelling foley catheter and BPH indwelling catheter interventions. Resident #53 preferred for his catheter to be up on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for two of eight residents (Resident # 7, Resident #12 and Resident # 68) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7, Resident #12 and Resident #68's nails were clean on 07/07/2026. This failure could place residents at risk for poor hygiene, dignity issues, and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #7's face sheet, dated 07/08/2026, reflected an [AGE] year-old-female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #7 had diagnoses which included, Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, with fluctuations (a movement disorder of the nervous system that causes unintended, dance-like, or writhing movements of the face, arms, legs, or trunk), and anxiety disorder (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. The[KS33.1] facility failed to ensure food safety by not discarding expired food in the kitchen, not maintaining a sanitary kitchen, and not implementing infection control when taking food temperatures. These failures can place residents at risk for foodborne illness. An Observation on 7/7/2026 at 9:00 AM of the walk-in cooler revealed the following. A opened container of Grape Jelly , , had an open date of 7/5/2026 and no use-by date. Flour Tortillas with the production date of 11/07/2025 with no use-by date. Opened yogurt in a sealed bag with an open date of 6/13/2026 with no use-by date. Sheet Tray of Jell-O in the cooler, not labeled with a date of manufacture or a use-by date.An Observation on 7/7/2026 at 9:10 AM: The walk-in freezer revealed the following. Piecrust with an open date of 7/3/2026 with no use-by date. Fried Okra in the original bag, had no open or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents received services with reasonable accommodation of resident's needs and preferences, except when to do so would endanger the health and safety of the resident or other residents, for 2 of 26 residents (Residents #20 and #80) reviewed for call light accessibility. The[KS46.1] facility failed to ensure the call light system was accessible to Residents #20, and #80.This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to call for staff assistance to meet care needs, This could put the residents at risk of injury or pain.Record review of Resident #20's Face sheet dated 07/09/2026 indicated that the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia[KS47.1] (organs don't get enough oxygen to function properly), obesity (Excess body weight), and acute pulmonary edema (buildup of fluid in the air sacs of the lungs).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-09 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I residents with a mental illness was completed correctly and were provided with a PASRR Level II assessment for one (Resident #62) of 4 residents reviewed for PASRR assessments. The facility failed to ensure the Social Worker entered Resident #62's PASRR Level l correctly into SimpleLTC portal (portal used by nursing facilities to manage resident's information). The PASRR entered did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness, although diagnosis of major depressive disorder was present upon admission on [DATE]. This failure could place all residents who had a mental illness at risk for not receiving needed assessment (PASRR Evaluation), individualized care, and services to meet their needs.Findings included:Record review of Resident #62's MDS Assessment, dated 06/17/2026, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her BIMS score was 14,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accidents hazards as was possible for one of three housekeeping carts (Housekeeping Cart #1) reviewed for hazards. The facility failed to ensure Housekeeping Cart #1, with chemicals inside the compartments, was locked when unsupervised on 07/07/2026 This failure could place residents at risk for injuries, illness, and hospitalization. Findings included: During an observation on 07/07/2026 at 1:15 p.m., Housekeeping Cart #1 was located on 400 hall in front of room [ROOM NUMBER] Observation reflected the compartment where chemicals were stored was not locked, and contained micro-kill bleach, disinfectant cleaner, and two bottles filled with chemicals without a label on the bottles. Observation reflected Housekeeper A was not standing near the housekeeping cart. She exited room [ROOM NUMBER] at 1:20 p.m., walked to the housekeeping cart, and was standing beside the cart. There were no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for two of three residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident #9 and Resident #53). 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's foley catheter was secured on 07/7/2026.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #53's foley catheter collection bag was not at or below the level of the bladder o at 3 observed times on 7/7/2026, 7/8/2026 and 7/9/2026. These failures to place residents with urinary catheters at risk for traumatic removal and catheter acquired infections.Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 07/09/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a common, preventable and treatable disease that is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms like progressive breathlessness and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to 1 of 4 medication carts (Medication Cart #1) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart #1, was locked, medications secured, and not accessible to other staff, residents, or visitors on 07/07/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to medications, decreased effectiveness of medication, or missing medications.Findings included: During an observation of the 300 hall on 07/07/2026 at 11:20 a.m., Medication Cart #1 was facing toward the hall area near the DON office located on 300 hall. The lock was protruding outward on Medication Cart #1. Observation reflected there was no staff in the hall or located near the observed unlocked Medication Cart #1. LVN E exited a resident's room approximately 11:27 a.m. on 300 hall and walked toward the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that describes the services that are to be furnished to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one resident (Resident #1) of 9 reviewed, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan reflected a plan of care for all of her fall interventions. Resident #1 was ordered to have a Geri-chair or tilt back wheelchair on 04/17/2026 after she experienced a fall on 04/16/2026 her care plan was not updated to include the intervention of the Geri-chair. This failure could place residents with falls at risk for injury.Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 07/01/2026 reflected a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses dementia (A group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life.), osteoarthritis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that included instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the residents, for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours of admission that addressed the care needs of newly admitted Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and services. The findings included: Record Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 02/05/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses frontal lobe and executive function deficit following cerebral infarction ( damage in the brain's frontal region, causing impairments with planning, organizing, initiating tasks, decision-making, emotional control, and behaviors), PSOAS- a long, ribbon-shaped muscle in your back- abscess ( a rare, severe collection of pus within the muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 resident (Resident #2) of 9 residents reviewed for trauma-informed care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had a trauma screening that identified possible triggers when Resident #2 had a history of trauma. This failure could place residents at an increased risk for psychological distress due to re-traumatization and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident # 2's Face sheet dated 02/05/2026 at 11:34 AM reflected an [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: dementia and altered mental status (when a person exhibits symptoms like confusion or disorientation) Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident, for 3 out of 5 residents reviewed for pharmacy services, in that: The facility failed to administer medications within the required timeframe for 3 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3) of 5 residents resulting in late medication administration. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications and supplements, could result in worsening or exacerbation of chronic medical conditions, and hospitalization.Findings included:Resident #1Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 9/25/2025 reflected an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Parkinson's disease (chronic, progressive brain disorder that affects movement), Hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #5) out of 5 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to clean up blood splatters on the floor of Resident #5's room after IV therapy.These failures placed residents at risk of transmission and/or spread of blood borne pathogens including infections or contagious diseases which could lead to infections and hospitalization.Findings included:Review of Resident #5's face sheet dated 9/25/2025 reflected resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses: metabolic encephalopathy, hypertension (high blood pressure), atrial fibrillation (heart rhythm disorder), hypothyroidism (thyroid disorder), vitamin deficiency. Review of Resident #5's progress notes dated 9/22/2025 reflected .MD informed who ordered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the PASRR level II determination and the PASRR evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care planning and transitions of care for one of four residents (Resident #1)reviewed for PASRR services . The facility failed to submit a NFSS request form for PASRR Specialized Services within 20 business days after PASRR Comprehensive Service IDT Meeting on 12/23/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed individualized care, and specialized services to meet their needs. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 06/11/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, and without mention of fluctuations (did not experience involuntary, erratic movements and there are no documented variations in the severity of their symptoms) and ,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of four resident reviewed for catheters. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had catheter care orders from 04/02/2025 to 05/07/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had catheter care orders from 05/09/2025 to 05/13/2025. These failures could place residents who required incontinent care at risk for development of new or worsening urinary tract infections or pain. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 05/14/2025 revealed an [AGE] year-old man admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage in urinary tract that prevents normal urine flow), dehydration, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and other acute osteomyelitis, right ankle and foot. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #48) reviewed for ADL's. The facility failed to ensure assistance was provided for repositioning and incontinent care every 2 hours for Resident #48 when he was observed to be left in his Geri-chair on 05/05/2025 from 7:00 AM until 4:00 PM. (9 hours). This failure could place residents at risk of not being provided care and assistance when needed. Findings Included: Review of Resident #48's face sheet dated 05/06/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses intracranial injury (head injury), spastic hemiplegia affecting dominant side (Hemiplegia is a symptom that involves one-sided paralysis.), contracture of left hand (A permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who required such services consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 2 of 3 (Resident #150, and Residents #85) residents reviewed for pain management. A) The facility failed to ensure Resident #150 effective pain management by not evaluating effectiveness of current pain medications and not having her current pain medications available for administration. B) The facility failed to ensure that Resident #85 received at least daily assessments of pain for 34 of 49 days. This failure could place resident at risk for increased pain causing undo suffering. Findings included: A) Review of Resident #150 face sheet dated 05/06/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses chronic pain syndrome, and other specified disorder of bone density and structure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserve nutritive value for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. 1. The facility failed to ensure Dietary [NAME] K refrained from adding an unmeasured amount of liquid from cooked carrots to puréed carrots during meal service on 5/6/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure Dietary [NAME] K refrained from adding an unmeasured amount of pan juices to puréed roast during meal service on 5/6/2025. This failure had the potential to affect all residents who received puréed diets prepared in the facility's kitchen, placing those residents at risk for diminished or altered nutritional status and potential weight loss. Findings included: Observation on 5/6/2025 at 10:24 AM revealed Dietary [NAME] K placed cooked carrots into the puree blender. She began to add unmeasured liquid from the cooked carrots to the puree blender. Dietary [NAME] K added unmeasured liquid twice to the puree blender with cooked carrots. Dietary [NAME] K proceeded to prepare the puréed roast by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen. 1. The facility failed to label and date all food items located in the walk-in refrigerator and in the dry food pantry area on 5/5/2025, 5/6/2025, and 5/7/2025. 2. The facility failed to discard expired food items located in the walk-in refrigerator and in the dry food pantry area. 3. The facility failed to clean and sanitize its cooking equipment, including the deep fryer and two ovens. 4. The facility failed to ensure that dietary staff wore hair restraints (e.g. beard restraints) to prevent hair from contacting food, per current Food Code. These failures could place residents who received meals from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illnesses. The findings included: Observation during the initial tour of the kitchen on 5/05/2024 beginning at 07:17 AM, the following was observed: Walk-in refrigerator: o Bag of coleslaw-not dated, not labeled, expiration date-4/25/2025. o Carton of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that included instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident, for one of four residents (Resident #150) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours of admission that addressed the care needs of newly admitted Resident #150. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and services. The findings included: Review of Resident #150 face sheet dated 05/06/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses chronic pain syndrome, and other specified disorder of bone density and structure, multiple sites. Review of Resident #150 EMR reflected the only MDS completed was her entry MDS dated [DATE]. Review of her nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] completed by LVN E reflected she was assessed for pain on admission with the pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that describes the services that are to be furnished to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #48), in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #48's comprehensive care plan reflected a plan of care for his left hand and neck contractures (A permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen and a decrease in ROM). This failure could place residents at risk for not having care needs identified and a plan to address those needs developed. Findings included: Review of Resident #48's face sheet dated 05/06/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses intracranial injury (head injury), spastic hemiplegia affecting dominant side (Hemiplegia is a symptom that involves one-sided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review and update care plan for one of twelve residents (Resident #84) reviewed for care plans timing and revision. The facility failed to ensure that care plan was updated and revised with safety interventions appropriate to resident's cognitive status for Resident #84 after falls on 4/28/2025 and 5/3/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of not having their medical, nursing, and mental needs met, and of not having their safety needs addressed. Finding included: Review of clinical records for Resident #84 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis of Fracture to Left Humerus (left upper arm fracture), Multiple rib fractures, Dementia, Diabetes (a condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), and Hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident #84's MDS dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 3 (severe cognitive impairment ). Health conditions show one fall since admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1of 4 residents reviewed with limited range of motion (Resident 48), received appropriate treatment and services to prevent a decrease in range of motion. The facility failed to ensure Resident #48 had interventions in place for his right- hand contracture and neck contracture (A permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen and a decrease in ROM) to prevent further decline of the range of motion in his right hand and neck. This deficient practice placed residents with contractures at risk for decrease in mobility, range of motion, and could contribute to worsening of contractures. Findings Include: Review of Resident #48's face sheet dated 05/06/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses intracranial injury (head injury), spastic hemiplegia affecting dominant side (Hemiplegia is a symptom that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #84) of twelve residents reviewed for fall interventions. The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents and develop effective interventions to prevent accidents for Resident #84 after falls on 2/8/2025, 4/28/2025, and 5/3/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of repeated falls with major injury and/or fracture. Findings include: Review of clinical records for Resident #84 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis of Fracture to Left Humerus (left upper arm fracture), Multiple rib fractures, Dementia, Diabetes (a condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), and Hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident #84's MDS dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 3 (severe cognitive impairment). Review of Resident #84's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drug and biological) to meet the needs of each resident for 1of 5 residents (Resident #150) reviewed for medications and pharmacy services, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #150 physician ordered medication Fentanyl was available for administration. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of not receiving therapeutic dosage of medications and symptomatic changes in vital signs. Findings include: Review of Resident #150 face sheet dated 05/06/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses chronic pain syndrome, and other specified disorder of bone density and structure, multiple sites. Review of Resident #150 EMR reflected the only MDS completed was her entry MDS dated [DATE]. Review of her nursing admission assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of 5% or greater. There were four (4) medication errors in 35 opportunities for an error rate of 11.43% by 1 of 3 staff members observed (LVN C) administering medications to 1 of 7 residents. (Resident #35). Resident #35 was administered 325 mg Aspirin, crushed via PEG tube. Order stated 81 mg Chewable Aspirin, administered by mouth. Medication was administered with the incorrect dose and route of administration. Resident #35 failed to receive adequate physical assessment per the accepted standards and principles which apply to professionals, including vital signs for blood pressure and pulse, prior to receiving medications for lowering blood pressure. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving medications as ordered and not receiving therapeutic benefits. Findings include: Review of Face sheet for Resident #35 reflected a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure expired and/or discontinued medications were removed from use for one of two medication storage rooms in the facility. The facility failed to ensure expired and/or discontinued medications were removed from use for one medication storage room. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefits of their medications. Findings include: Observation and interview on 05/07/2025 at 11:25 AM of medication storage review for Medication Storage closet on Hall 100 revealed six bottles of Multivitamins with an expiration date of 01/2024 and one box of Nicotine Patches with an expiration date of 04/2024. The ADON present at the time of the review observed and removed the expired packages from the room. The ADON stated that medications would be disposed of per facility policy. Interview on 5/8/2025 at 1:52 PM with DON stated that her expectation is that the supply person monitor the expiration dates when supplies are restocked. She stated a Unit Manager/ADON will be assigned to review this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections and follow accepted national standards for two of three residents reviewed for infection control practices. (Resident #5 and Resident #35). The facility failed to ensure that LVN C, LVN E, and Hospice RN P followed Enhanced Barrier Precautions when providing care and use of invasive lines for Resident #5 with medication administration through a PEG tube and for Resident #35 during urinary catheter bag change. These failures could place the residents at risk for developing infection. Findings included: Review of Face sheet for Resident #35 reflected a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Cerebral Infarction (interruption of blood flow to the brain), Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen and food sanitation. 1. The facility failed to label and date all food items located in the refrigerators and freezer. 2. The facility failed to ensure damaged or dented canned food items were kept in a separate designated area and not used. 3. The facility failed to ensure kitchen staff practiced proper hand hygiene and glove use when preparing food. 4. The facility failed to ensure kitchen staff cleaned and sanitized the blender in between pureed food items. 5. The facility failed to ensure staff used proper hygienic practice when handling food and feeding a resident. 6. The facility failed to ensure kitchen staff were knowledgeable about food holding temperatures, and the appropriate device used to measure internal temperature . These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. Findings included: During the initial tour of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations listed in the findings, the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I Screening for residents diagnosed with mental illness were accurate and residents were provided with a PASARR Level II Screening for 2 of 2 resident's (Resident #42 and Resident #55) reviewed for PASARR coordination. The facility failed to ensure Resident #42-Level 1 screening dated 10/05/2020 - listed no and Resident #55 PASARR-Level 1 screening dated 11/01/2022 - listed no PASARR Level 2 evaluation. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving necessary mental health services, causing a decline in mental health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #42's face sheet dated 03/29/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old woman admitted on [DATE]. Resident #42 had diagnoses which included spinal stenosis-lumbar region without neurogenic claudication (an abnormal narrowing of the spinal canal or neural foramen that results in pressure on the spinal cord or nerve…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews , and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food and drink that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for residents who consumed foods orally from the only kitchen in the facility in that: 1. The kitchen test tray of the lunch meal foods was burnt, inedible, and unappealing. 2. The facility failed to provide palatable food that was attractive or appetizing to residents' who complained the food did not look or taste good. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, unwanted weight loss, and diminished quality of life. The findings included: 1. An observation at 03/29/2024 at 12:40 PM a lunch test tray was sampled. The test tray consisted of country fried steak with cream gravy, mac and cheese, green beans, and corn bread. On the side there was a small bowl of fruit cobbler, a glass of water, and a glass of sweet tea. Initial observation of the meal the food looked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assess each resident quarterly using the Minimum Data Set form specified by the state and approved by CMS for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #57) reviewed for quarterly assessments, in that: The facility failed to ensure a quarterly MDS assessment was completed within 92 days of the previous quarterly assessment for Resident #55. The quarterly MDS Assessment was required to be completed, signed and transmitted by the due date of 02/28/2024. It was signed and completed on 03/29/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their needs met in a timely manner. The findings included: Record review of Resident #57's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old resident with an original admission date of 10/11/2019 with the following diagnoses type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications (a disease that occurs when a person's body does not use insulin effectively), Venous Insufficiency (Chronic) (Peripheral) ((CVI) happens when your leg veins become…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one resident (Resident #94) of eight reviewed, in that: A) The facility failed to ensure Resident #94's Comprehensive Care Plan reflected a revision for his isolation precautions related to MRSA (Methicillin Resistant staphylococcus aureus) and his current skin condition. B) The facility failed to ensure Resident #46's Comprehensive Care Plan reflected his use of a indwelling urinary catheter. This failure could place a resident at risk for errors in provider care, poor wound healing/worsening wound condition, and the potential spread of infection. Findings included: A) Review of Resident #94's Face sheet dated 03/28/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Huntington's Disease (is a rare, inherited disease that causes the progressive breakdown (degeneration) of nerve cells in the brain.), Cerebral Infarction (the pathologic process that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for two of six residents reviewed for catheter care (Resident #4 and Resident #46). A) The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's had a plan of care for her catheter, that it was secured to her body with a catheter secure device and failed to monitor her catheter care per the facility policy. B) The facility failed to ensure Resident #46's catheter was ordered by a physician, had a plan of care and was secured to his body with a catheter secure device per the facility policy. This failure to secure catheters placed residents with urinary catheters at risk for traumatic removal and catheter acquired infections. Findings included: A) Review of Resident #4's Face sheet dated 02/02/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the safe handling, humidification, cleaning, storage, and dispensing of oxygen for respiratory care services provided to 3 of 3 residents (Resident 35, 53, and 56) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Residents oxygen tubing was dated to ensure it was changed weekly for 3 residents (Resident 35, 53, and 56) as ordered by the physician and as verbally reported to be the facility policy by DON. The facility failed to have a written policy to ensure the safe handling, humidification, cleaning, storage, and dispensing of oxygen on 03/29/2024 at 10:10 a.m. A policy is required per guidelines. The facility failed to ensure that the Oxygen setting matched the physicians order for 1 of the 3 residents. Oxygen set at 4 Liters per minute instead of the 3 Liters per minute ordered. This failure placed the residents at risk of developing a respiratory infection from contamination of the tubing and humidifier water.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 3 resident reviewed (Resident #24, #52, and #5) for infection control. The facility failed to ensure MA-F performed proper hand hygiene and failed to ensure MA sanitized equipment for infection control during 03/28/2024 medication pass for Residents #24, #52 and #5. This failure placed residents at risk for development of communicable diseases and infections. Findings included: Review of 03/28/2204 face sheet for Resident 24 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of Cerebrovascular Disease, Diabetes Type 2, Cerebral Infarction (stroke) with right side paralysis, Congestive Heart Failure and Depression. Review of March 2024 Medication Administration Record for Resident 24 reflects…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury for 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse of CNA A slapped Resident #1 on 10/18/2023 was reported to the state survey agency within two hours after the administrator was informed of the alleged abused. This failure could place residents at risk of emotional, physical and mental abuse and neglect. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's facility face sheet, dated 12/07/2023 , reflected Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with primary diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-07-09 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of correction in effect with respect to survey were readily available to examine for 1 of 1 facility in that:1. The results of the most recent survey were not posted in a location readily accessible to all residents, their legal representatives, or family members as required.2. The facility failed to maintain the survey binder; the binder failed to include 3 previous years of required state visit results from 1/07/23, 3/29/24, 5/8/25 and recent visits 1/15/26 and 02/05/226.This failure placed residents of the facility at risk of not knowing past and present citations of the facility and potentially being negatively affected by an area of citation.Findings included:An observation and interview conducted through facility on 07/08/26 at 3:44 PM revealed the survey results were not posted readily available in the lobby or any common…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,044 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,044 — penalty dated 2026-01-15
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LEGACY NURSING & REHABILITATION — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRYAN PROPCO, L.L.C. | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2025 |
| VDG LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/01/2025 |
| CLARK, JUSTA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/01/2025 |
| HAYNES, BILLIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2016 |
| SPRABERRY, DAVID | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2016 |
| KLEIN, PETE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 09/01/2025 |
| LYTLE, LARRY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 09/01/2025 |
| SHAW, MAX | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 09/01/2025 |
| WILSON, TERI | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 09/01/2025 |
| VEST, BARBARA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/01/2025 |
| ANSON HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2025 |
| BRYAN OPCO LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2025 |
| DYMOCK, MATHEW | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2025 |
| GUM, VICTOR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2025 |
| STONE, DIANA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2025 |
| DGPREJEAN, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2025 |
| JDGUM, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2025 |
| LP HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2025 |
| MYLESH, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2025 |
| HOLYFIELD, MYLES | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 455351. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-07-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.