No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Legacy Nursing at St. Christina

122 Hillsdale Drive, Pineville, LA 71360 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 140 certified beds · (318) 448-0141 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)6 actual-harm citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$646,937 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 6 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $646,937 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-30)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
1135 Expressway Dr Ste 100A · (318) 442-1026 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walmart1.6 mi
2750 Highway 28 E · (318) 229-4185 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3606 3rd St · (318) 445-1791 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Kees Park1.6 mi
2450 Highway 28 E · (318) 449-5676 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1295 Bayou Maria Rd · (318) 443-6894

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.7%17.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.7%5.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.2%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%2.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.7%17.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication46.5%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.3%94.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.9%5.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.7%15.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table73.1%22.7%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication12.5%3.1%1.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine43.8%76.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.0%28.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.2%14.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.752.561.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.882.741.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
43.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 43.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.7–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge43.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge46.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge33.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting93.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened11.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 3.1–12.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.221.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.08
RN hours/ resident / day
1.02
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.12
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.23
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.11
RN hoursweekends
48.1%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 128.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.08 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.07 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-24)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-28)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

61 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from resident to resident physical abuse for 1 (Resident #2) of 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4) sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in Actual Harm for Resident #2 on 09/21/2025 at 3:30 pm, when Resident #2 was hit by Resident #4 in the face with his left fist. Resident #2 was sent to a local emergency department where he received treatment for a facial contusion. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention and Prohibition revealed in part. Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. Residents must not be subject to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff or other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends, or other individuals. Abuse defined: Abuse means the willful infliction of injury,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the resident's person centered plan of care, for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) residents sampled for quality of care. This deficient practice resulted in a delay in treatment of a wound to Resident #3's right elbow, and development of cellulitis of the right elbow that required antibiotic treatment. This failed practice resulted in an actual harm for Resident #3 on 02/26/2025 at 2:26 p.m., when the resident was observed to have a wound to his right elbow, with edema and erythema noted. On 02/21/2025 at 11:38 p.m., Resident #3 sustained a 1cm x 1cm skin tear to the right elbow as a result of a fall, and first aid was administered at that time. Wound care was ordered on 02/23/2025 to clean right elbow scratch with NS, apply Triple Antibiotic Ointment (TAO) and cover with clean dry dressing until healed, monitor for S/S of complications. Resident #3 did not receive the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from being punched and kicked by Resident #2 on 09/18/2024, and pushed down on the ground by Resident #2 on 10/04/2024. This failed practice resulted in an actual harm situation for Resident #1 on 09/18/2024 at 3:00 p.m., when a CNA reported Resident #1 was on the floor after wandering into Resident #2's room, and Resident #2 was kicking Resident #1 in the chest and abdominal areas with bare feet; and on 10/04/2024 at approximately 3:50 p.m., when Resident #2 pushed Resident #1 from behind, causing him to fall to the floor face first. Resident #1 was transported to the emergency room on [DATE], and diagnosed with Laceration of [NAME] Border of Upper Lip, which required 5 Prolene sutures. Findings: Review of the facility's policy Abuse Prevention…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from resident to resident physical abuse, for 1 (Resident #1), of 3 sampled residents (#1, #2, and #3). The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not hit in the face by Resident #2. This failed practice resulted in an Actual Harm situation for Resident #1 on 01/31/2024 at 8:50 p.m. Resident #1 wandered into Resident #2's room, and Resident #2 hit Resident #1 in the face. Resident #1's right eye was red and slightly swollen immediately after the incident. On 02/01/2024 at approximately 8:00 a.m., staff noted Resident #1's eye to have increased swelling and discoloration. Resident #1 was transferred via ambulance to a local emergency room on [DATE] at 8:30 a.m. Review of a Radiology Report dated 02/01/2024 at 10:00 a.m. revealed Impression: Acute fractures involving the maxillary spine and central maxilla with suspected injury to the root of the left maxillary central incisor and significant soft…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was immediately notified when there was a significant change in a resident's physical health, for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents (#1, #2 and #3). This failed practice resulted in an actual harm situation for Resident #1 on 12/22/2023 at approximately 8:45 a.m., when Resident #1 was observed by S8 CNA to have difficulty walking, and was unable to feed himself. S4 LPN was notified; however, S4 LPN did not notify Resident #1's physician. At 2:00 p.m., S8 CNA reported Resident #1's condition to S1 Administrator. Resident #1 was sent to the hospital, and underwent a left Frontoparietal Epidural Hematoma Evacuation on 12/23/2023. Findings: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an original admission date of 05/13/2021, and a readmission date of 10/24/2023. Diagnoses included in part . Traumatic Subdural Hemorrhage without Loss of Consciousness, Sequela - 12/26/2023; Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type; Generalized Anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a residents' rights to be free from staff to resident physical abuse, for 1 (Resident #1), of 3 sampled residents (#1, #2, and #3). The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not pushed by S5 CNA, while S5 CNA was in the process of intervening during an aggressive act by another resident. This failed practice resulted in an Actual Harm situation for Resident #1 on 12/14/2023 at 4:19 p.m. Resident #1 was pushed by S5 CNA in the dayroom of Hall A, while S5 CNA intervened in an incident that involved Resident #2 and S6 CNA. S5 CNA intervened when Resident #2 grabbed S6 CNA's shirt. S5 CNA pushed Resident #1 during the intervention, and Resident #1 fell and hit his head on a tiled floor. Resident #1 was transferred via ambulance to a local emergency room on [DATE] at 6:39 p.m. The ER record revealed: Primary Impression: Temporal Bone Fracture. Additional Impressions: Epidural Hemorrhage, Subdural Hemorrhage, and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to be free from resident to resident physical abuse. The facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #18) of 4 (Resident #18, Resident #313, Resident #314, and Resident #363) sampled residents for abuse were not physically abused. This deficient practice resulted in an Actual Harm for Resident #18 that began on 06/18/2023 at 9:40 p.m. when Resident #363 threw the arm of his wheelchair at Resident #18 striking him on the left side of the face. Resident #18 received first-aid treatment in the facility for a laceration to the left face and was sent to a local ED where Resident #18 received three sutures to the left face laceration. Resident #18 continued to complain of pain to the left eye and was referred to ophthalmology on 07/13/2023, when it was determined Resident #18 would require eye surgery. Review of discharge instructions from the ophthalmologist revealed that Resident # 18 underwent a lens removal on 08/08/2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-24 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program was developed, implemented, and/or maintained in an effective and comprehensive manner. The facility failed to maintain documentation of its ongoing QAPI program. This deficient practice has the potential to affect 131 residents residing in the facility.Review of facility undated policy titled QAPI Policy and Procedure revealed in part. the facility shall develop, implement, and maintain ongoing, facility wide Quality Assurance and Performance (QAPI) program that builds on the Quality Assessment and Assurance Program to actively pursue quality of care and quality of life goals. Procedure: Develop, Implement, and maintain an ongoing facility wide QAPI plan designed to monitor and evaluate the quality and safety of resident care, pursue methods to improve care quality, and resolve identified concerns. 7. Establish systems and process to maintain documentation relative to the QAPI program, as a basis for demonstrating that there is an effective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide documentation of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that addresses the facility's performance improvement activities and projects. The facility failed to provide evidence of the number and frequency of improvement projects conducted. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 131 residents residing in the facility.The facility was unable to present any documented evidence of activities, projects, or the frequency of improvement projects addressing services for the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program during the survey. In an interview on 02/24/2026 at 4:30 p.m. with S1 DON, S2 ADM, and S17 Regional, it was revealed that the facility is unable to locate its QAPI binder, which contains the facility's documentation and evidence of its ongoing QAPI program. The facility was unable to provide documentation of its systems and reports on the facility's reporting, investigations, tracking, trending, and monitoring of issues identified in the facility and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that each Resident was treated with respect and dignity in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life by failing to:1. Ensure all residents seated at the same table were served simultaneously during dining service.2. Ensure Resident #100 was served his meal tray in his room at the same time of his roommate.Total sample size: 56 Findings:1.On 02/22/2026 at 11:51 a.m., Observation of dining room revealed residents seated at the same table were not served at the same time. Three residents were observed seated together at one table. One resident at the table received her meal tray at that time. Following the delivery of that tray, staff were observed serving residents at other tables. On 02/22/2026 at 12:07 p.m., the remaining residents seated at the same table had not yet received their meal trays. On 2/22/2026 at 12:08 p.m., an interview with S14RN/Weekend Supervisor, confirmed that residents seated at the same table should be served meal trays at the same time,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered plan of care for each resident and ensure that care and services were furnished to attain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 4 (Resident #10, #32, #80, and #90) of 56 sampled residents by the facility failing to:1. Provide a fall mat as care planned for Resident #90,2. Develop and implement a plan of care related to the activity of daily living (ADL) needs for Resident #32, 3. Provide a splint for a left hand contracture for Resident #80 as care planned.4. Develop and implement a care plan related to Resident #10's nebulizer treatments. Review of facility undated policy titled, Care Planning Policy and Procedure, revealed in part. Purpose: To provide a comprehensive plan of care addressing the resident's needs, strengths, goals, and approaches. Policy: Each resident's care plan will remain current and inform staff of resident's needs, strengths, goals, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide care and services that met professional standards of quality by failing: 1. To accurately assess and document the presence of skin tears for Resident #682. To ensure Physician's Orders were implemented for Resident #100. Review of a facility policy titled, Skin/Wound Documentation Policy and Procedure with no review date, read in part.Policy: Skin and wounds will be documented upon admission, readmission, weekly and as needed. Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed an admit date of 12/23/2025 with diagnoses that included in part. Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/23/2025 with diagnoses that included in part.Hypertension, Neuroleptic Induced Parkinsonism, Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Review of Resident #68's admission MDS with an ARD of 12/29/2025 revealed a BIMS sore of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed Resident #68 needed partial/moderate assistance with toileting and oral hygiene;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed in order to meet the nutritional needs of residents who required a puree diet. The facility failed to follow the menu to ensure the nutritional adequacy of the meal for all 6 residents who received a puree diet.Findings:In an interview during the second kitchen visit on 02/22/2026 at 10:30 a.m., S11 Kitchen Staff revealed the facility had 6 residents being served a puree diet. In an observation on 02/22/2026 at 10:45 a.m., S11 Kitchen Staff failed to puree the roll which was included on the lunch menu. In an interview on 02/23/2026 at 12:15 p.m., S11 Kitchen Staff confirmed that she had not pureed the roll that was included on the menu on 02/22/2026. S11 Kitchen Staff also confirmed she had not been pureeing any bread items when listed on the menu for an unspecified amount of time for all 6 residents who received a puree diet. In an interview on 02/23/2026 at 12:20 p.m., S6 Dietary Manager confirmed S11 Kitchen Staff did not follow the menu on 02/22/2026 by not pureeing the roll but should have.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Review of a facility policy titled Advance Directives Policy and Procedure, with no review date read in part.Procedure: 10. The plan of care for each resident will be consistent with his or her documented treatment preferences and/or advance directive.Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/23/2025 with diagnoses that included in part.Hypertension, Neuroleptic Induced Parkinsonism, Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder.Review of Resident #68's medical record on 02/22/2026 at 2:23 p.m. revealed Resident #68's 02/2026 Physician Orders read in part. order dated 01/16/2026-LaPOST-DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). Review of Resident #68's Care Plan with a Target Date of 04/11/2026 revealed in part . I have and advance directive-Full Code with interventions that included in part.I need the nursing staff to have knowledge of my advance directives. I need the social worker to review with me quarterly and as needed for changes in my advance directives.Interview on 02/23/2026 at 11:37…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene by failing to provide assistance with bathing for 1 (Resident #113) of 5 residents reviewed for ADLs. Findings:Review of Resident #113's medical record revealed an admit date of 07/10/2025 with diagnoses which included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Atrial Fibrillation, Paranoid Schizophrenia, Major Depressive Disorder, Heart Failure, and Lack of Coordination. Review of Resident #113's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 01/05/2026 revealed Resident #113 had a BIMs score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #113 required partial/moderate assistance with bathing. Review of Resident #113's Care Plan revealed that Resident #113 required staff assistance with ADL care, including bathing. Review of Resident #113's bathing task documentation for the last 30 days revealed Resident #113 received a whirlpool bath on 02/06/2026, 02/17/2026, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Review of a facility policy titled Oxygen Concentrator Cleaning Policy and Procedure, with no review date read in part.Procedure:Store Oxygen tubing, cannula, and mask in plastic bag when not in use.Oxygen tubing, cannula and mask to be changed weekly and as needed.Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admit date of 01/02/2025 with diagnoses which included in part.Anemia, Parkinson's Disease without Dyskinesia, Other Specified symptoms and signs involving the Circulatory and Respiratory Systems and Personal History of Pneumonia.Review of Resident #10's Physician Orders dated 02/2026 revealed in part.Ipratropium-Albuterol Inhalation Solution (breathing treatment) 0.5-2.5 (3) MG/3ML. 1 application inhale orally every six hours related to Other Specified symptoms and signs involving the Circulatory and Respiratory Systems. Order date 11/24/2025.Observation on 02/22/2026 at 1:55 p.m. revealed a nebulizer machine on Resident #10 bedside table. Nebulizer mask was lying on top of the nebulizer machine, uncovered and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Findings:Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admit date of 10/25/2025.with diagnoses that included in part.Paraplegia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Essential Hypertension, and Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder.Review of the Resident #9's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 02/03/2026 revealed the following:Section K - Swallowing/Nutritional Status - The resident was on a therapeutic diet. Review of Resident #9's physician orders dated 10/25/2025 revealed an order for NAS (no added salt) diet, Regular texture, Regular-Thin consistency. Double meat, paper tray set up.Review of Resident #9's care plan revealed in part.Intervention: I need my diet served to me as ordered.1.On 02/23/2026 at 1:08 p.m., Interview and Observation of Resident #9's lunch meal ticket revealed diet of NAS, texture regular, fluid thin liquids, with no note for double meat. Observation of Resident #9's lunch tray when first served to the resident revealed he had one piece of fried chicken breast. Resident #9 stated he never gets double portion meat for meals.On 02/23/2026, Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 44 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to prevent the likelihood of foodborne illnesses and failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to ensure that kitchen staff were wearing hair restraints including beard restraints to prevent hair from contacting food. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all of the residents who received meals from the kitchen. There were 131 residents who resided in the facility.Findings:Observation on 02/23/2026 at 12:15 p.m. of the facility's kitchen revealed three male kitchen workers with beards not wearing beard restraints while preparing food, serving food, and washing dishes. Interview on 02/23/2026 at 12:17 p.m. with S6 Dietary Manager revealed that beard restraints are easily available to the male workers with beards. She confirmed that the male kitchen workers with beards should have had beard restraints on but did not.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance committee met at least quarterly to identify facility issues and coordinate and evaluate performance improvement projects.A review of the facility's Quality Assurance binder revealed that the last documented Quality Assurance (QA) meeting was held on 10/15/2025 for the 2025 3rd quarter (July-September).In an interview on 02/24/2026 at 4:33 p.m., S2 ADM stated that the QAA committee did have a meeting for the 2025 4th quarter, and the documented meeting minutes were located in the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program) binder, which the facility cannot locate. S2 ADM stated he had no documented evidence of the QAA committee meeting for the 2025 4th quarter.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control environment by failing to ensure the facility was free from insects. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all 131 residents who resided in the facility.Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Pest Control Policy and Procedure read in part.Policy: The facility shall maintain an effective pest control program.Procedure: 1. This facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents. During an observation of Resident #8's room on 02/23/2026 at 7:51 a.m., 8:50 a.m., and 9:20 a.m. revealed multiple gnats on a basket of soiled clothes and multiple gnats flying around on top of the basket of clothes. In an interview on 02/23/2026 at 2:05 p.m., S8 NS Adm acknowledged multiple gnats were observed in Resident #8's room in the basket and on top of the soiled clothes and should not have been. In an interview on 02/24/2026 at 6:20 p.m., S5 CES confirmed the above findings.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    A review of the facility's undated policy titled, Quality of Care Policy and Procedure, read in part. It is the policy of our company that each resident receives the necessary care to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological well-being, in accordance with the resident's comprehensive assessment and plan of care.Resident #1Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/06/2022, with diagnoses that included, in part. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Type II Diabetes, and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy.Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/30/2025 revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. Resident #1 required moderate assistance with showering and bathing.Review of Resident #1's electronic health record's facility task titled, Bathing/Shower Scheduled (Three times weekly) Specify days:(Monday, Wednesday, Friday OR Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday) with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of verbal abuse was reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, to the State Survey Agency for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Abuse Reporting and Investigation Policy and Procedure, read in part. 2. An Alleged violation of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment will be reported immediately, but no later than: a. Two (2) hours if the alleged violation involves abuse OR has resulted in serious bodily injury. Verbal Abuse is defined as the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance or sight, regardless of age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Examples: Name-calling, cursing, yelling at a patient in anger.Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/06/2022, with diagnoses that included, in part. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of staff to resident sexual abuse and resident to resident physical abuse was reported to the State Survey Agency immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the staff to resident sexual abuse and resident to resident physical abuse was discovered, for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) sampled residents. Findings:Review of an undated facility policy titled “Abuse Prevention and Prohibition” revealed in part . “An alleged violation of abuse…will be reported immediately, but not later than: Two (2) hours if the alleged violation involves abuse OR has resulted in serious bodily injury - to the mandated state agency per reporting criteria within guidelines of notification of an alleged abuse.” Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/08/2025, a discharge date of 09/25/2025, with diagnoses that included in part…Intellectual Disabilities, Schizoaffective Disorder; Anxiety Disorder; Major Depressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet professional standards of practice by failing to ensure a residents received a prescribed antibiotic in a timely manner for 1 (#2) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents. Findings:Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admit date of 03/10/2025 with diagnoses that included: Other Chronic Osteomyelitis, Left ankle and foot, Cerebral Infarction, Unspecified Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Persona; History of Urinary Tract Infection, Unspecified Mood Affective Disorder, Epilepsy, Paranoid Schizophrenia, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed a progress notes dated 06/23/2025 by the facility Nurse Practitioner read in part. New order noted for urinalysis with culture and sensitivity for dysuria and altered mental status. Review of Resident #2's medical records revealed an unloaded urinalysis dated 06/26/2025 with a hand written note at the bottom that read Cefdinir 300 mg BID. Review of Resident #2's 06/2025 Physician Orders read in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received enteral feedings as ordered by the physician for 1 (#3) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents. Findings:Review of the Facility's undated policy titled Enteral Feeding Therapy (Tube Feeding) Policy and Procedure read in part.Purpose: to provide liquid nourishment through a tube, inserted into the stomach. Policy: All enteral tube feedings shall have care according to physician orders. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed and admit date of 09/28/2021 with a readmission date of 07/10/2024 with diagnoses that included: Cerebral Palsy, Aphasia, Mild Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Gastrostomy Status, Dysphagia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Bipolar Disorder. Review of Resident #3's admission MDS with an ARD of 07/22/2025 revealed a BIMS of 2, which indicated severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #3's Care Plan with a review date of 11/02/2025 read in part. I require a PEG tube for adequate nutritional intake related to my dysphagia. Administer my tube feeding as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a record review and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services that met professional standards of quality by failing to ensure that a resident's medical record reflected whether Physician's Orders were implemented or refused. The facility failed to document whether wound care was or was not provided for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) residents reviewed for skin and pressure ulcers. Review of facility undated policy titled, Skin/Wound Documentation Policy and Procedure, revealed in part. Skin and wounds will be documented upon admission, readmission, weekly, and as needed. The facility shall follow the practitioner's orders for treatment of the pressure ulcer (injury). With each dressing change, or at least weekly, the pressure ulcer (injury) wound shall be assessed and documented. Pressure ulcer (injury) documentation should include, in part.date and time of initial and subsequent treatments. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admit date of 03/10/2025 with the following diagnoses in part. Chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who are unable to carry out ADLS (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #3) of 3(Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. The facility failed to ensure a Bath/Shower was provided for Resident #3.A review of facility undated policy titled, Quality of Care Policy and Procedure, read in part. It is the policy of our company that each resident receives the necessary care to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychological well-being, in accordance with the resident's comprehensive assessment and plan of care.Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admit date of 03/10/2025 with the following diagnoses in part. Chronic Osteomyelitis Left Ankle and Foot, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, Dysarthria following Cerebral Infarction, Epilepsy, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Presence of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary and orderly interior. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 124 resident's that resided at the facility. Findings:Observation on 07/21/2025 at 11:45 a.m. of Resident #2's room (Room B) revealed the floor had hair and a dark brown substance near the bed area. The wall near Resident #2's bed had a moderate amount of a splattered substance that was tan and pink in color. The window blinds in the room had broken pieces and was in disrepair.Observation on 07/21/2025 at 11:49 a.m. of Room A area revealed a large puddle of yellow liquid on the floor. The area smelled of urine. Interview with S4Corporate at time of observation confirmed the floor was unsanitary and was in need of cleaning.Observation on 07/21/2025 at 11:56 a.m. of Hall A, near Room C revealed a ceiling tile with a moderate sized amount of mold. Interview with S10HK at time of observation revealed the ceiling had been leaking, for at least a few weeks, and she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide care and services that meet professional standards of quality, by failing to: 1. Perform weights as ordered for 3 (#3, #4, and #R1) of 6 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #R1, and #R2) residents reviewed for weights; and 2. Input orders for wound care for 1 (#4) of 3 (#2, #3, and #4) residents reviewed for wound care. Findings: 1. Resident #3 Review of the Facility's undated policy titled Weight Evaluation Policy and Procedure read in part .Purpose: To review, monitor, and maintain the resident weight. Procedure: 1. Weights are to be completed and documented in PCC chart for resident. 3. The following residents will be weighed weekly for 4 weeks until stable unless otherwise prescribed by the physician. D. 5% loss or gain in less than 31 days. Review of Resident #3 's medical record revealed an admit date of 03/28/2025 with diagnoses that included in part: Spondylolisthesis, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, Pseudoarthrosis after Fusion, Major Depressive Disorder, Hemiplegia, and Personal History of Urinary Tract…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received reasonable accommodation of needs for 2 (#3 and #4) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, and #4) sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 and Resident #4 had an appropriate call light and that it was within reach to call for assistance. Findings: Review of the Facility's undated policy titled Call light, Use of Policy and Procedure read in part . Policy: To respond promptly to residents call for assistance. Procedure: 13. Have the resident demonstrate the use of the call light to be sure he/she understands your instructions. 15. Be sure the call lights are placed on the bed at all times, never on the floor or bedside stand. Resident #3 Review of Resident #3 's medical record revealed an admit date of 03/28/2025 with diagnoses that included in part: Spondylolisthesis, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, Pseudoarthrosis after Fusion, Major Depressive Disorder, Hemiplegia, and Personal History of Urinary Tract Infection. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an ARD of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #3) of 2 ( Resident #3 and Resident #4) sampled residents received the necessary treatment and services to prevent and promote the healing of pressure ulcers by failing to perform hand hygiene during treatment of a pressure ulcer. Findings: Review of Resident #3 's medical record revealed an admit date of 03/28/2025 with diagnoses that included in part: Spondylolisthesis, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, Major Depressive Disorder, Hemiplegia, and Personal History of Urinary Tract Infection. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an ARD of 04/08/2025 revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Resident #3 was totally dependent on staff and required physical assistance for all activities of daily living. Review of Resident #3's 06/2025 Physician Orders read in part . Treatment #1- Unstageable Pressure Ulcer to left buttocks. Cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply medihoney to wound bed, followed by calcium…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free of medication errors for 1 (#4) of 4 residents reviewed. The facility failed to ensure medications were administered to Resident #4 as ordered by the physician. Findings: Review of Resident #4 's medical record revealed an admit date of 04/28/2020 and a re-entry date of 06/05/2025 with diagnoses that included in part: Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation; Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia; Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure; Mild Protein-Calorie Malnutrition; Schizoaffective Disorder; Bipolar Type; Major Depressive Disorder; Generalized Anxiety Disorder; and Peripheral Vascular Disease. Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an ARD of 06/08/2025 revealed Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Resident #4 was dependent or required substantial/ maximum assistance with activities of daily living. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. The facility failed to ensure: 1. A wound care order was documented for Resident #3 when received by facility; 2. Documentation on the Treatment Administration Report (TAR) was accurate for Resident #3; and 3. Wound care was documented for Resident #3. Findings: Interview with S5 ADON on 02/26/2025 at 11:25 a.m. revealed Resident #3 had a fall with a wound to his right elbow on 02/21/2025. S5 ADON confirmed there should have been an order for wound care for Resident #3, but there was not. Interview with S2 DON on 02/26/2025 at 2:07 p.m., revealed she was not at the facility on 02/21/2025, and was notified by S10 RN via telephone that Resident #3 had fallen and had a wound to his right elbow. S10 RN notified the provider on 02/21/2025 at 11:38 p.m., and was given an order for wound care. S2 DON stated on 02/25/2025 she realized the order for wound care had not been documented or entered. S2 DON stated she performed wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure services were provided according to the residents plan of care for 2 (#33 and #91) out of a sample of 40 residents. The facility failed to follow the following physician's orders for monthly labs for Resident #33 and failed to ensure wound care was provided for Resident #91 as ordered. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Lab/Diagnostic Monitoring Log Policy and Procedure on 01/28/2025 read in part Purpose: To ensure all labs and diagnostics are completed and followed up on for all residents as ordered by the physician. Procedure: All nurses are responsible for: 1. Making sure labs/diagnostics are being performed. Resident #33 Review of Resident #33's medical records revealed an admit date of 01/10/2023 with diagnoses that included: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Cerebellar Stroke Syndrome, Unspecified Convulsions, Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Conversion Disorder with seizures or Convulsions. Review of Resident #33's 01/2025 Physician's Order read in part 11/07/2023-Trileptal Oral Tablet 150 MG…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, comfortable and homelike environment by failing to ensure the cleanliness and good repair of patient care equipment for 2 (Resident #52 and Resident #39) of 40 total sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Reusable Medical Devices Cleaning Policy and Procedure read in part . Purpose: To keep reusable medical devices clean and prevent transmission of infection. Policy: Reusable medical devices will be cleaned after each resident use to prevent spread of infection. Procedure: 1. All surface areas of the machine will be cleaned with disinfectant wipe according to manufacture recommendations. Equipment and Supplies: 7. Any reusable medical device Resident #52 Observation on 01/26/2025 at 10:30 a.m. revealed Resident #52's wheelchair cushion was soiled with a large amount of brown substance. Observation on 01/27/2025 at 09:41 a.m. revealed Resident #52's wheelchair and black wheelchair cushion was visibly dirty. Observation on 01/28/2025 at 10:23 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to transmit/encode a Discharge MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment accurately for 1 (Resident #100) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for resident assessments. The total sample size was 40 residents. Findings: Review of Resident #100's clinical record revealed an admit date of 11/18/2024 with diagnoses that included Bipolar Disorder, current episode mixed, Severe without Psychotic Features, Sepsis, unspecified organism, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Major Depressive Disorder, unspecified Mood (Affective) Disorder, Anxiety Disorder and Essential (Primary) Hypertension. Review of Resident #100's Discharge summary dated [DATE] read in part . Resident #100 requested to transfer to sister facility. Resident #100 only stayed at facility one night and wanted to leave AMA. Resident #100 decided she would prefer to be transferred to another nursing home and her spouse agreed. Resident #100 was transported by staff with her medications and all of her belongings. Signed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide care and services that met professional standards of quality by failing to ensure physician's orders were implemented as ordered. The facility failed to ensure the correct tube feeding was administered at a continuous rate for 1 (#67) of 1 residents reviewed for tube feeding. Total sample size was 40. Findings: Review of the Facility's undated Policy titled Enteral Nutritional Therapy, (Tube Feeding) Policy and Procedure revealed in part .All enteral tube feedings shall have care according to physician orders. Review of Resident #67's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/14/2022 with a re-entry date of 05/07/2024 with diagnoses that included in part .Cerebral infarction unspecified; Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar type; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; Dysphagia following Cerebral Infarction; Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting right dominant side; Paranoid Schizophrenia; Unspecified Dementia. Review of Resident #67's Annual MDS with an ARD of 01/19/2025 revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary service to maintain good nutrition for 1 (Resident #52) resident reviewed during dining services in a total of 40 sampled residents. The facility failed to provide assistance during meal time to Resident #52. Findings: Review of the Facility's undated Policy titled Meal- Time Assistance Policy and Procedure revealed in part . Policy: All residents who require assistance with meals will be provided assistance. Purpose: To ensure residents receive adequate nutrition. Procedure: 1. Assistance will be provided to residents as needed. Review of Resident #52's clinical record revealed an admit date of 08/15/2023 with diagnoses which included in part . Huntington's disease, contracture-right hand, drug induced subacute dyskinesia, and deficiency of other vitamins. Review of Resident #52's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 11/19/2024 revealed a BIMS was not conducted: resident rarely/never understood. Resident had modified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed a resident's person centered plan of care, by failing to use 2-person physical assistance when transferring a resident from wheelchair to bed for 1 (Resident #55) of 3 (Resident #55, Resident #79, and Resident #251) residents reviewed for accidents. Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Transfer Activities Policy and Procedure on 01/28/2025 revealed in part . Purpose: To transfer the resident from bed to chair or toilet safely. Procedure: 1. Obtain assistance of another individual if necessary, for safe transfer. Review of Resident 55's medical records revealed an admit date of 04/28/2020 with diagnoses that included: Hypertensive Heart disease with Heart Failure, Schizoaffective Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, and Peripheral Vascular Disease. Review of Resident #55's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 09/17/2024 revealed a BIMS score of 14, indicative of intact cognition. Resident #55 required 2-person physical assist for bed mobility and transfers. Resident #55 had range of motion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for 2 (Resident #67 and Resident #81) of 4 sampled Residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure equipment was properly labeled and stored. Total sample size was 40. Findings: Resident #81 Review of Resident #81's medical record revealed an admit date of 04/12/2023 with diagnoses that included in part .Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Asthma, Respiratory Infection, Pneumonia in Diseases Classified Elsewhere and Dementia. Review of Resident #81's active Physician orders revealed the following order with a start date of 08/23/2024: Administer Oxygen at 2 Liters per minute via nasal cannula as needed for Shortness of Breath. Review of Resident #81's Care Plan with a Target date of 02/04/2025 revealed in part .I have Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or Chronic Lung Disease with interventions that included in part .I need Oxygen when I have a respiratory crisis, administer nebulizer treatments as ordered.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient nursing staff available at all times to provide nursing and related services to meet the resident's needs and safety in a manner that promotes each residents rights, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. The facility failed to ensure there was sufficient staff on Saturday 09/28/2024, to provide care and services for residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 96. Findings: Review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) staffing data submission for fiscal year 2024, Quarter 4 revealed in part .one star staffing rating (triggered), and excessively low weekend staffing (triggered). Review of a Staffing Pattern Reporting Form for 07/01/2024 - 09/30/2024 revealed in part . On 09/28/2024, the facility's census was 110 residents. Minimum staffing hours required for that day was 258.5 hours; however, the total number of nursing hours provided on 09/28/2024 was 256.5. Interview on 01/28/2025 at 4:56 p.m. with S2 Interim DON, confirmed the facility did not provide sufficient nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of resident to resident abuse was reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, to the State Survey Agency for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents. Findings: An alleged violation of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment (including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property) will be reported immediately, but no later than: Two (2) hours if the alleged violation involves abuse OR has resulted in serious bodily injury; or Twenty-four (24) hours if the alleged violation does not involve abuse AND has not resulted in serious bodily injury. Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/16/2024, with diagnoses that included: Cerebral Infarction, Chronic Kidney Disease, Schizoaffective Disorder, Aneurism of Unspecified Site, Personal History of Traumatic Brain Injury, Major Depressive Disorder, and Anxiety Disorder. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of staff to resident physical abuse was reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, to the State Survey Agency for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy on 03/14/2024 at 4:20 p.m. titled Abuse Prevention and Prohibition revision 4.0 dated 01/27/2023 read in part . An alleged violation of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment (including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property) will be reported immediately, but not later than: Two (2) hours if the alleged violation involves abuse OR has resulted in serious bodily injury . The facility administrator or designee shall report or cause a report to be made to the mandated state agency per reporting criteria within guidelines of notification of an alleged abuse. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 01/16/2024 revealed a BIMS score of 13, indicating intact cognition. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that an allegation of staff to resident physical abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy on 03/14/2024 at 4:20 p.m. titled Abuse Prevention and Prohibition revision 4.0 dated 01/27/2023 read in part . Investigation: Administrator or designee will complete a thorough investigation. Interview employees who were working in resident's room during the time in question. Signed statements should be obtained from these employees. Interview the resident if they are cognitively able to answer questions. If the resident is not interviewable, interview the roommate. Resident family and friends may be questioned. A licensed professional nurse will examine the resident for signs of injury and notify the resident's physician of any injuries noted. Maintain a file in the administrator or designee office. This file must be kept private and confidential. Review of the facility's investigation documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act promptly on grievances concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility reported by residents during a monthly Resident Council meeting for 1 (10/30/2023) of 3 (08/28/2023, 09/26/2023, and 10/30/2023) meetings reviewed. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Grievance Policy and Procedure read in part . Purpose: 1. To ensure each resident has the right to voice grievances with respect to treatment or care, that is, or fails to be furnished without discrimination or reprisal for voicing grievances. 2. To ensure each resident grievance will be followed up by prompt efforts to resolve grievance that the resident may have, including those with respect to the behavior of other residents. Policy: All grievances will be investigated thoroughly, and appropriate corrective action taken. Procedure: 1. The facility Administrator or designee will act as the Grievance Official. 6. Resident council or other resident meeting minutes are to be given to administration after completion of meeting. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet professional standards of practice for 3 (Resident #70, Resident #80, and Resident #90) of 37 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure: 1. A resident's peg tube was checked for placement and residual prior to beginning a feeding as ordered for Resident #70, 2. Physician's orders for peg tube feedings were followed for Resident #80, and 3. Physician's orders for documenting percentages of Mighty Shake and House Supplement were followed for Resident #90. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Enteral Nutritional Therapy, (Tube Feeding) Policy and Procedure revealed in part . Procedure: 1. Place resident in semi-Fowler's position, unless contraindicated. 2. Remove plug from end of feeding tube, check position of tube, and attach barrel of syringe to end of tubing. 3. Check position of tube by: a. Listening for breath sounds at end of tube or place end of tube in a glass of water below water level to be sure no bubbles appear from Nasogastric tube. b.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility had 8 consecutive hours per day of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 4 of 91 days reviewed for RN hours. Findings: Review of the facility's PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report for Fiscal Year Quarter 3 2023 (April 1-June 30) revealed no RN hours on 04/16/2023, 04/23/2023, 04/29/2023, and 04/30/2023. In an interview on 11/15/2023 at 3:46 p.m., S1 Administrator stated she could not confirm there was no RN coverage on the days reported in April 2023 because she was not employed by the facility at that time and was unable to obtain the information from the previous owner of the facility. S1 Administrator acknowledged the four days were reported by the old company as not having RN coverage. In an interview on 11/16/2023 at 8:10 a.m., S2 DON acknowledged she did work at the facility in April 2023 and confirmed there was no RN coverage on 04/16/2023, 04/23/2023, 04/29/2023, and 04/30/2023.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months for 5 (S5 CNA, S6 CNA, S7 CNA, S8 CNA, and S9 CNA) of 5 CNA personnel records reviewed. Findings: Review of personnel records revealed the following: 1. S5 CNA-date of hire was on 08/31/2018. Further review failed to reveal evidence that an annual performance review had been completed in the past 12 months. 2. S6 CNA- date of hire was on 08/21/2015. Further review failed to reveal evidence that an annual performance review had been completed in the past 12 months. 3. S7 CNA-date of hire was on 10/02/2019. Further review failed to reveal evidence that an annual performance review had been completed in the past 12 months. 4. S8 CNA-date of hire was on 09/14/2017. Further review failed to reveal evidence that an annual performance review had been completed in the past 12 months. 5. S9 CNA-date of hire was on 08/01/2017. Further review failed to reveal evidence that an annual performance review had been completed in the past 12 months. In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were disposed of properly. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 119 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Observation on 11/13/2023 at 9:00 a.m. of the facility dumpster area accompanied by S23 DM revealed there were three dumpsters. Two of the three dumpsters were observed to be overflowing with garbage bags with lids unable to be completely closed. One dumpster was observed to have bags of trash stacked on top of the partially closed lid. The above findings were confirmed with S23 DM at the time of observation.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 (Resident #101) of 1 residents sampled for dignity. The facility failed to ensure Resident #101 was dressed in appropriate footwear. Findings: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: Hypertensive Heart Disease, Moderate Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Anxiety Disorder, Hyperlipidemia, Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy, Chronic Pain Syndrome, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of Resident #101's MDS Assessment with an ARD of 10/06/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed Resident #101 required supervision for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Review of the Resident #101's care plan with a target date of 01/24/2024 revealed in part…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 2 (Resident #45 and Resident #66) residents by failing to ensure the floor was in good repair for Room A; and by failing to ensure a residents clothes were stored properly off the floor. Total sample size was 37. Findings: Resident #45 Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed an admit date of 02/07/2019 with diagnoses which included: Schizoaffective Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder and Vascular Dementia Severe with other Behavioral Disturbance. Review of Resident #45's Annual MDS with an ARD of 01/19/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 99 (indicating resident was unable to complete the interview). The MDS revealed Resident #45 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Observation on 11/13/2023 at 9:23 a.m. revealed Resident #45 who resided in room A lying on the bed. At the foot of Resident #45's bed were several missing floor tiles. Observation on 11/14/2023 at 9:17 a.m. of Room A revealed several missing floor tiles at the foot of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure their grievance policy and procedure was followed by failing to ensure prompt investigation of an allegation and to provide a written resolution of a resident's complaint/grievance for 1 (Resident #29) resident of 37 sampled residents. Findings: Facility's Grievance Policy read in part . Purpose: To ensure each resident grievance will be followed up by prompt efforts to resolve grievances that the resident may have, including those with respect to the behavior of other residents. Policy: All grievances will be investigated thoroughly, and appropriate corrective action take. Review of Resident #29's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 07/08/2023 revealed resident had a BIMS score of 15 (indicating intact cognition). Resident #29's MDS revealed he is able to be understood and understand others. Resident #29 had clear speech and used distinct intelligible words. Review of a facility form titled Grievance/Complaint Report dated 09/28/2023 at 12:15 p.m. by S12 SSD read in part .Resident #29 stated that another Resident (Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a reportable incident was reported to the State Agency for 1 (#18) of 3 (#18, #108, #313) residents reviewed for incidents and accidents. The facility failed to report an incidence of resident to resident abuse. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention and Prohibition revealed in part . Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff or other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends or other individuals. Abuse defined: Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Resident abuse may include: 1. resident to resident abuse Physical Abuse may include an aggressive act, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person centered plan of care consistent with the resident rights, which included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #55) of 37 sampled residents. The facility failed to include in Resident #55's care plan the need for staff assistance with ADLs. Findings: Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed an admit date of 02/13/2023 with diagnoses which included: Schizoaffective Disorder, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Osteoarthritis, Neuropathy, and Glaucoma. Review of Resident #55's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 09/13/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The MDS revealed Resident #55 required extensive 2+ person physical assistance with bed mobility, transfer, and toilet use; limited one person physical assistance with dressing and personal hygiene; and one person physical help in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident #78) of 37 sampled residents, by failing to reflect Resident #78 required increased supervision due to wandering behavior. Findings: Review of Resident #78's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/10/2022 with diagnoses that included in part .Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Left Non-dominant side; Traumatic Subdural Hemorrhage; Major Depressive Disorder Recurrent-Severe with Psychotic symptoms; Generalized Anxiety Disorder; Schizoaffective Disorder Bipolar Type, and Post Traumatic Seizures. Review of Resident #78's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 05/31/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 99 (indicating unable to complete interview) The MDS revealed Resident #78 had verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward other (threatening others, screaming at others, cursing at others). The MDS revealed Resident #78 was coded as requiring 2 person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use and 1 person assistance for eating,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 3 (Resident #19, Resident #77, and Resident #90) of 5 (Resident #19, Resident #31, Resident #55, Resident #77, and Resident #90) residents investigated for activities of daily living out of a total sample of 37 residents. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Nail Care Policy and Procedure read in part . Policy: 1. To prevent infection. 2. To prevent irritation. 3. To prevent break in skin integrity. 4. To promote peripheral circulation. 5. To promote cleanliness. 6. To relieve pain. Procedure: 1. Care of fingernails and toenails is part of the bath. 2. Be certain the nails are clean. Resident #19 Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed an admit date of 01/01/2011 with diagnoses which included in part . Schizoaffective Disorder Depressive Type, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Aphasia, Vascular Severe with other Behavioral Disturbance and Pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents and incidents for 1 (#363) of 3 (#18, #108, and #363) sampled residents for incidents and accidents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #363 received increased supervision after inflicting injury upon Resident #18. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention and Prohibition revealed in part . Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff or other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends or other individuals. Abuse defined: Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Resident abuse may include: 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service. The facility failed to ensure that expired/outdated items were not available for resident consumption. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that received meals prepared by the kitchen. Findings: Initial tour of the kitchen on 11/13/2023 at 8:30 a.m. accompanied by S23 DM revealed the following items on cooler shelves for use: 1 opened case of 118 mL thickened orange juice containers with a use by date of 10/24/2023, 1 opened 48 count case of 4 oz. yogurt cups with a use by date of 11/07/2023, and 1 opened case of sugar free gelatin cups with a use by date of 11/01/2023. The above findings were confirmed with S23 DM at the time of observation.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident's responsible party (RP) was notified of an unplanned discharge and a significant change in physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 2 (#1, #2) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility failed to: 1. Notify Resident #1's RP of his unplanned discharge from the facility. 2. Notify Resident #2's RP of a significant change in her condition that required a transfer to the hospital. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Change of Condition policy and procedure revealed in part: Purpose: to ensure that person's involved in the residents care are made of aware of any changes to the resident. Policy: Physicians, responsible family members or legal representatives shall be notified as soon as possible, or within 24 hours, of any changes in the resident's condition. Procedure: 1. The Charge nurse shall be responsible for notifying the attending physician and the resident's RP members or legal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered plan of care for 1 (Resident #4) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents. The facility failed to have Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (a narcotic analgesic) 10-325 mg available to administer PRN when Resident #4 required it for pain. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration Policy and Procedure revealed in part . Policy The facility shall provide medications as ordered by the physician. 35. Each dose of medication administered shall be properly recorded in the resident's medical record. Review of Resident #4's Medical Record revealed an admit date of 11/02/2022 with diagnoses that included: Other Secondary Parkinsonism; Other Lack of Coordination; Other Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility; Chronic Pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were available to be administered as ordered for 1 (Resident #4) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents. The facility failed to have Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (a narcotic analgesic) 10-325 mg available to administer PRN when Resident #4 required it for pain. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration Policy and Procedure revealed in part . Policy The facility shall provide medications as ordered by the physician. Review of a facility document titled Orders, Monitoring Guidelines revealed in part . Areas to Monitor Daily 4. Clinical Dashboard a. Number of Active and On Hold Medication Schedules for Each Resident i. Review the current medication count of all active and on hold pharmacy category orders for each resident. ii. This information can assist with billing and pharmacy reviews. Review of Resident #4's Medical Record revealed an admit date of 11/02/2022, with diagnoses that included: Other Secondary Parkinsonism;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$646,937 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $17,713 — penalty dated 2025-09-30
  • $34,753 — penalty dated 2025-02-27
  • $319,992 — penalty dated 2024-10-25
  • $64,344 — penalty dated 2024-02-26
  • $210,135 — penalty dated 2023-11-16
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-15 for 61 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LEGACY NURSING & REHABILITATION — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LP2 HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2023
DGPREJEAN, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2023
JDGUM, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2023
MYLESH, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2023
VDG LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2023
GUM, JOHNIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2023
GUM, VICTORIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/10/2026
HOLYFIELD, MYLESIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2023
PREJEAN, DANIELLEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2023
LEGACY MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2023
FULLER, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/25/2025
SMITH, BRIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/05/2025
LP THERAPY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2026
PINEVILLE PROPERTY GROUP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/12/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$226K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 88%Medicare 7%Other / private 4%

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $226K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$223per resident / day
operating cost
$6,792per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$238per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in LA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Louisiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Louisiana
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,076/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,163/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 195613. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next