Hunt Nursing & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 73 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 22.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 108.5 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose comprehensive plan of care indicated he/she was at risk for falls due to impulsivity and decreased strength, required assistance from two staff members for toileting and transfers, with a staff member remaining outside the bathroom door while he/she was on the toilet, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed interventions identified in his/her care plan, when on 02/26/24, Resident #1 told the Director of Rehabilitation (DOR) that he/she had to use the bathroom, The DOR left him/her in his/her room to take him/herself to the bathroom, and did not tell any other staff that he/she was going to use the bathroom. Resident #1 transferred him/herself into the bathroom and as a result, fell. The next day, Resident #1 complained of left elbow pain and was diagnosed with a fractured elbow. Findings include: The Facility Policy, titled Care Planning, indicated the Facility would develop and implement a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was known to be impulsive, required two staff member assistance for toilet transfers, with one staff member remaining outside the bathroom door while he/she was on the toilet to provide standby assistance, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance to maintain his/her safety, when on 02/26/24, Resident #1 told the Director of Rehabilitation (DOR) that he/she had to use the bathroom, the DOR left him/her in his/her room to take him/herself to the bathroom, and did not inform any other staff that he/she was going to use the bathroom. Resident #1 attempted to transfer him/herself in the bathroom, fell, sustained a skin tear to his/her left arm, and the next day he/she complained of left elbow pain and was diagnosed with a fractured elbow. Findings include: The Facility Policy, titled Falls Risk Reduction, dated 11/02/23, indicated residents determined to have risk…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice were implemented for one Resident (#35) out of a total of 29 sampled Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain an initial treatment order for an open skin area and failed to ensure Resident #35 was seen timely by the wound physician. Subsequently, Resident #35 had an open area for approximately 12 days before being seen by the wound physician and having an ordered treatment. Findings include: Review of the National Library of Medicine article titled Wound Dressings dated 1/23/24 indicated: When the skin is compromised due to wounds, a complex healing process is triggered by various cell types and microenvironments. Choosing the proper wound dressing is crucial to accelerate healing, reduce treatment costs, and improve the patient's overall well-being.Review of the facility's Skin Integrity Management policy dated as revised 12/3/25 indicated: When…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to implement a recommendation by the optometrist for one Resident (#26) out of a total sample of 29 residents. Findings include:Resident #26 was admitted to the facility in May 2022 with diagnoses including spina bifida, colostomy, hypertension, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. Review of Resident #26's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) examination score of 15 out of a possible 15, indicating he/she is cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated Resident #26 is dependent in staff for activities of daily living and wears corrective lenses. During an interview on 2/10/26 at 8:02 A.M., Resident #26 said he/she was seen by the eye doctor a few months back and recommended cataract surgery for his/her left eye. Resident #26 said he/she has not been informed if an appointment has been made and is worried his/her vision is getting worse.Review of Resident #26's medical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement treatment orders as recommended by the Wound Physician for one Resident (#85) out of a total of 29 sampled Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement betadine treatment to a right heel deep tissue injury (DTI; a wound that occurs related to pressure) for approximately 43 days. Findings include: Review of the Skin Integrity Management policy dated as revised 12/3/25 indicated: When a skin breakdown is identified, report this timely to medical practitioner and resident representative as required by policy. Obtain wound treatment order. Obtain referral to wound consultant who will partner with facility nurse in conducting wound assessment and treatment review. Every treatment recommendation will be reviewed, timely with the resident's primary Medical Practitioner.Resident #85 was admitted to the facility in August 2025 with diagnoses including neuro cognitive disorder with Lewy bodies and Parkinsons disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment 11/18/25 indicated Resident #85 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff stored drugs and biologicals in accordance with State and Federal requirements. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated once opened, according to manufacturer's guidelines, in six of six medication carts observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Storage of Medications, dated [DATE], indicated Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. On [DATE] at 8:43 A.M., the surveyor observed the third floor west side medication cart. The surveyor observed with Nurse #3 the following: - one Fluticasone Propionate inhaler opened, in use and undated. - one Advair Diskus inhaler opened, in use and undated. - one Breo Ellipta inhaler opened, in use and undated. - one Combivent Respimat inhaler opened, in use and undated. During an interview on [DATE] at 8:44 A.M., Nurse #3 said the expectation is the nurse who…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directives (written documents that instruct health care providers of the decisions for specific medical treatment if a person was unable to speak or lacked the capacity to make decisions for themselves) were consistently documented in the medical record for one Resident (#60) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Advanced Directives and MOLST (Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment)/Do Not Resuscitate Orders), dated [DATE], indicated To respect each resident's right to participate in and/or make his/her treatment decisions. Advanced Directives will be reviewed with resident/resident representative at the time of admission and thereafter at least quarterly during care planning meetings. A MOLST and/or DNR Order, if available, will be included in resident's care planning and records and reflect a resident's directive to receive or not receive CPR in the event of cardiac or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive resident centered care plan was developed and/or implemented for two Residents (#48 and #95) out of a total sample of 24 Residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #48, the facility failed to develop an individualized comprehensive resident centered care plan related to the monitoring and care of a pacemaker. 2. For Resident #95, the facility failed to implement the Resident's care plan for elevating his/her feet while in bed and for the use of Darco shoes when ambulating. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Pacemaker, Care of Permanent, revised May 2005, indicated the following: Procedure -Include an entry for pacemaker on the resident's Care Plan. -Enter on the resident's Care Plan, the type of pacemaker, date of insertion, rate, pacemaker check, lab and phone number. -Report to physician any rate change of more than five impulses per minute, missed beats or any unaccustomed sensations associated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with the appropriate treatment and services to maintain activities of daily living for one Resident (#40) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #40's recommendations for a functional maintenance program from physical therapy were maintained resulting in the Resident only using his/her wheelchair for mobility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy, dated September 2011, indicated the following: - It is the policy of the facility to provide rehabilitation services to all residents whose plan of care includes such services. These services will be administered in a safe, clean environment. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in September 2021 with diagnoses including polyneuropathy, polyarthritis and chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident #40's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain professional standards in the management and care for urinary catheter devices for one Resident (#95) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that an indwelling catheter bag (a tube that enters the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) was at the proper location below the Resident's bladder to allow urine to be drained into the bag for Resident #95. Findings include: Resident #95 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, bipolar disorder, dementia, obstructive and reflux uropathy and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #95's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 5 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS indicated that the Resident did not reject care, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a history of falls, was assessed by nursing as being at risk for falls and whose comprehensive plan of care included an intervention of a fall mat on the floor beside his/her bed when in bed, the Facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented and followed the plan of care, when on 10/21/24, Resident #1 was found on the floor after a fall out of bed, and there was no fall mat in place beside his/her bed. Findings include: The Facility Policy, titled Care Planning, dated 10/28/22, indicated the Facility would develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychological needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in June 2024, diagnoses included dementia and history of falls. Review of Resident #1's Falls Risk…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staffing level reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that sufficient staffing levels, as defined by the facility assessment, were maintained to meet each resident's personal and cognitive care needs safely and adequately. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Staffing in the Department of Nursing, revised 05/02/05, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: -It is the policy of this facility to have sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and consider the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment. A system is in place to determine daily staffing needs, using a staffing pattern established by comparing policies and standards and reviewed by the Administrator and the Director of Nursing Services.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,517 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,517 — penalty dated 2024-04-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to INTEGRITUS HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $909K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA