No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hillcrest Commons Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

169 Valentine Road, Pittsfield, MA 01201 · Non profit - Corporation · 265 certified beds · (413) 445-2300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (413) 445-2300 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 34 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
165 Tor Ct · (413) 445-7246 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
200 West St · (413) 447-9844 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
228 Francis Ave · (973) 910-9877 · Call to confirm hours
Park
30 John St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
400 Columbus Ave · (413) 445-4506

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.6%16.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.9%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.8%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.2%1.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms26.0%15.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%3.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.3%15.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.8%19.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine76.1%94.8%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.3%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.3%21.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table31.5%21.4%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%1.4%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.0%77.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission14.7%25.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.9%11.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.411.881.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.911.501.80typical

‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 258 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.14U.S. median 0.30
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 118 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 11% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.6%CMS range 47.6–63.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.3%CMS range 9.8–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge55.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 4.3–9.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.011.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
1.04
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.32
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.75
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
34.5%
Total nursing turnover
27.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 265 beds and averages 231.0 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5 ↓
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-26)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to offer and/or administer updated Pneumococcal immunizations, according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations to 14 Residents (#83, #18, #55, #148, #158, #207, #78, #191, #114, #108, #143, #186, #79, and #134) of 25 applicable residents for vaccinations, out of a total sample of 35 residents, placing the residents at risk for to develop pneumococcal infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Administer an updated Pneumococcal Vaccine to Residents #83, #18, #55, #148, #158, #207, #78, #191, #114, #108, and #143, when the Residents were eligible for the vaccine and consented to receive an updated Pneumococcal Vaccine. 2. Offer an updated Pneumococcal Vaccine to Residents #186, #79, and #134, when the Residents were eligible to receive an updated Pneumococcal Vaccine. Findings include: Review of the facility's Resident Pneumococcal Immunization Policy, dated September 2011 and revised 9/1/23, indicated the following: -Residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that resident rights were honored for one Resident (#182) out of a total sample of 35 residents, when the Resident had a specific request relative to medication administration.Specifically, for Resident #182, the facility staff failed to honor the Resident's request to take his/her morning medications with a meal when the Resident notified the Nurse that he/she was experiencing stomach discomfort and expressed a preference to take his/her morning medications with the breakfast meal. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Resident's Rights, initiated June 1996 and revised 10/4/23, indicated:-A resident has the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and have access to people inside and outside the facility.-A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care in a manner and environment, that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life and recognizing each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate accommodation of needs for one Resident (#6), out of a total sample of 35 residents. Specifically, for Resident #6, the facility failed to provide a wheelchair that accommodated the Resident's physical needs for use while he/she was out of bed, and the Resident's preference was to get out of bed and his/her bedroom, placing the Resident at risk for decreased mobility and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Residents' Rights Policy indicated: -A resident has the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to people inside and outside the facility. -A resident has the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of other residents. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in October 2025 with diagnoses including Morbid Obesity, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to notify the Physician/Nurse Practitioner (NP) of consistent refusal of a weekly prescribed medication for one Resident (#11) out of a total sample of 35 residents.Specifically, for Resident #11, the facility failed to notify the Physician/NP of the Resident's refusal of his/her weekly medication order for Methotrexate (anti-inflammatory, pain-reducing medication used to treat certain cancers, severe psoriasis, and autoimmune diseases), placing the Resident at risk of disease progression and discomfort. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Physician Notification, dated 11/11/09, revised September 2011, indicated:-Upon identification of a resident who has clinical changes, change in condition, or abnormal lab values, a licensed nurse will perform appropriate clinical observations and data collection and report to physician as indicated.-Purpose is to communicate a change in residents' condition to physicians and initiate interventions as needed/ordered.-The protocols for physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure nutritional interventions were implemented per the Registered Dietitian (RD) recommendation to address unanticipated, unplanned weight loss for one Resident (#9), of seven applicable residents reviewed for nutrition care and services, out of a total sample of 35 residents.Specifically, for Resident #9, the facility failed to ensure fortified ice cream (Magic Cup) was added to the Resident's lunch tray per the RD's recommendation when the Resident experienced ongoing significant weight loss (weight loss greater than or equal to 5 percent (%) over one month, 7.5% over three months, 10 % over 6-month period) and was determined to be at increased nutritional risk. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Nutrition Management, revised 9/30/24, indicated the following:-Residents will receive care and services to ensure acceptable parameters of nutritional status are maintained to the extent possible as indicated by the resident's clinical condition.-Resident will receive a therapeutic diet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the facility main kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner to prevent contamination and the spread of foodborne illnesses. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure: -food for resident consumption was stored appropriately and were labeled and dated. -equipment used for meal preparation were clean and free of debris when not in use. -fans utilized in the kitchen remained dust free preventing potential physical contamination. -an issue with the facility dish machine was identified when the minimum wash temperatures were not obtained, as required. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dietary: Sanitary Conditions, revised 9/21/22, indicated that the facility will follow proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness. The policy also included the following: -safe food handling for the prevention of foodborne illnesses begins when food is received from the vendor and continues through the facility's food handling process…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide therapeutic diets as ordered by the health care Provider for nutrition and hydration management for four Residents (#163, #89, #125, and #40) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #163, the facility failed to ensure a nutritional supplement was administered as ordered by the Physician after the Resident had a significant weight loss potentially resulting in a further weight decline. 2. For Resident #89, the facility staff failed to establish an accurate fluid plan as ordered by the Physician and inconsistently recorded the total daily fluid intake, placing the Resident at risk for fluid volume overload and related complications when more than the fluid restricted limit was consumed. 3. For Resident #125, the facility failed to review the Physician's order and accurately monitor the Resident's fluid intake for the Resident who was on dialysis. 4. For Resident #40, the facility failed to accurately assess 24-hour…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-25 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement corrective and preventive actions and re-evaluate a performance improvement plan (PIP) when the identified interventions were no longer making progress toward the identified goal for reducing the amount of food allergens that were sent to residents on meal trays. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that an effective system was maintained for implementing changes and monitoring performance putting residents in the facility at risk for significant harm relative to ingesting a food allergen. Findings include: Review of the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, undated, indicated the following: -Purpose and Goals -Take a proactive approach to continually improve the way we care for and engage with our residents/clients, caregivers, and other partners . -Guiding Principles: -Uses QAPI to make decisions and guide our day to day operations. -Makes decisions based on data . -Collects and monitors data related to the outcomes of subpopulations .and uses the data to determine QAPI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices in accordance with professional standards of practice to prevent the potential spread of infection for one Resident (#209), out of a total sample of 36 residents, and on four units (Unit 1, Unit 2, Unit 3 and Unit 4) out of five units. Specifically, the facility failed to: -ensure the appropriate precautions were initiated timely when Resident #209 was identified with gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea and vomiting) increasing the risk for the spread of infection to other residents and staff. -initiate norovirus outbreak monitoring timely resulting in the spread of infection to Unit's 1, 2, 3, and 4. Findings include: Review of CDC Guideline for the Prevention and Control of Norovirus Gastroenteritis Outbreaks in Healthcare Settings, revised March 21, 2024, retrieved from, https://www.cdc.gov/infection-control/hcp/norovirus-guidelines/summary-recommendations.html indicated: -Avoid exposure to vomitus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to assess self-administration of medication for one Resident (#135), out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, for Resident #135, the facility failed to: -ensure an IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) assessment was completed for the Resident to self-administer Albuterol Sulfate Inhaler (bronchodilator medication) and Trelegy Ellipta Inhaler (combination beta-agonist/anticholinergic/ corticosteroid medication) medications prior to allowing the Resident to have the inhalers in his/her possession. -ensure that the medication was safely and appropriately stored when the Resident was observed to store an inhaler in their clothing, on his/her bedside table, and in an unlocked bedside drawer. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Self Administration of Medications, revised June 2021, indicated the following: -The Resident will be assessed for cognitive, physical and visual ability to self-administer medications upon admission, quarterly and as needed with significant change in status. -If the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure written notification was provided for two Residents (#40 and #199) out of a total of 36 residents, who experienced room and/or roommates changes. Specifically, 1. For Resident #40, the facility failed to provide written notification when the Resident had several roommate changes after his/her roommate/ significant other (SO) passed away. 2. For Resident #199, the facility failed to notify and provide written notification to the Resident when two separate room changes occurred within a timeframe of less than one week. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Residents' Rights Policy, revised 10/4/23, indicated residents/resident representatives have rights and protections under federal law ensuring fair care and services are rendered without reprisals. The policy also included the following: -a facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment, that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life and recognizing each resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments for ten Residents (#132, #171, #53, #158, #229, #10, #155, #123, #226 and #47), out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically: 1) For Resident #132, the facility failed to accurately code the Resident as having a feeding tube in use. 2) For Resident #171, the facility failed to accurately code medication administration relative to the Resident receiving Insulin medication when the Resident was prescribed and administered a Diabetes medication that was non- Insulin. 3) For Resident #53, the facility failed to ensure that the most recent comprehensive MDS Assessments was coded accurately relative to upper extremity limited range of motion (ROM). 4) For Resident #158, the facility failed to ensure the most recent comprehensive MDS Assessment was coded accurately relative to a vision related diagnosis. 5) For Resident #229, the facility failed to ensure the discharge MDS Assessment was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care in accordance with assessed needs, goals for care, preferences, and recognized standards of practice for one Resident (#155) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, for Resident #155, the facility failed to: -provide consistent ADL assistance relative to dressing, nail and hand hygiene care when the Resident had bilateral hand contractures and was dependent on staff for bathing, dressing and personal hygiene increasing the risk for skin breakdown and resulting in development of a fungal infection in his/her left hand that required medical treatment. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled ADLs: basic skills needed in regular daily life including ambulating, dressing, bathing, eating), dated 11/14/16, indicated: -Each Resident will receive the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing, consistent with the Resident's comprehensive assessment and plan of care. >The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#215) out of a total sample of 36 Residents received quality of care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, for Resident #215, the facility failed to: -apply ACE bandages on the day shift as ordered to the Resident's bilateral legs to manage swelling and treatment of bilateral leg edema. -provide care and services that reflected the Resident's preference for application of the ACE bandages when the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) indicated the ACE bandages were applied to the Resident's lower extremites and the Resident was observed without the ACE bandages in place. Findings include: Resident #215 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with diagnoses including Hypertension, Hypothyroidism and lower extremity (leg) edema. Review of the facility policy titled Documentation -Clinical, revised on 10/31/23, indicated the following: -Medication and Treatment: >the Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment to prevent further decrease in range of motion (ROM) for one Resident (#123) with limited ROM, out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement a passive ROM (PROM) program to Resident #123's lower extremities when the Resident had bilateral lower extremity contractures and was unable to perform his/her own lower extremity ROM, which increased the Resident's risk for progression of lower extremity contractures and pain. Findings include: Review of the American Stroke Association guidance titled Spasticity, https://www.stroke.org/en/about-stroke/effects-of-stroke/physical-effects/spasticity last reviewed 5/30/23, indicated the following: -Spasticity is a common post-stroke condition that causes stiff or rigid muscles. -When a muscle cannot complete its full ROM, the surrounding tendons and soft tissue can become tight. -This makes stretching the muscle much more difficult.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#40) received dialysis care in accordance with professional standards of practice for three applicable residents receiving dialysis, out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nursing assessments, including assessment of the dialysis access site, vital signs and blood sugar levels, were performed when Resident #40 returned from dialysis. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Coordination of Care of Dialysis Residents, revised 11/19/18, indicated the nursing facility was responsible for the overall quality of care and services the resident receives and provides the services, consistent with professional standard of practices, to residents receiving dialysis as outlined by their comprehensive person-centered plan of care. The policy also included the following: -a comprehensive person-centered plan of care is developed and implemented based on comprehensive assessment in collaboration with the Dialysis Center, in accordance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that triggers relative to a past trauma were identified to create an individualized trauma care plan for one Resident (#199) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, for Resident #199, the facility failed to ensure that an individualized care plan addressed Resident #199's triggers so they could be reduced in his/her environment. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Trauma Informed Care, revised 6/17/24, indicated the following: -Social service department will develop a person-centered trauma-informed care plan that addresses the assessed emotional and psychosocial needs of the resident. -Interdisciplinary team (IDT) to provide ongoing assessment, evaluation, and revision of care plan. Resident #199 was admitted to the facility in June 2024 with diagnoses including Cerebral Infarction (stroke) with left sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate medical care and supervision for one Resident (#224) out of a total sample of 36 Residents. Specifically, for Resident #224, the facility failed to ensure that the Provider was aware of the Resident's weight loss and oversaw his/her nutritional status. Findings include: Resident #224 was admitted to the facility in February 2025 with diagnoses including Anoxic Brain Damage, posterior reversible Encephalopathy, Aphasia and Gastrostomy Status. Review of Resident #224's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]. indicated: -based on staff assessment the Resident had some difficulty with daily decision making in new situations only. -the Resident received 25 - 50% of his/her caloric intake from Tube Feeding. Review of Resident #224's weights indicated the following: -2/21/25: 196.6 pounds (lbs) -3/4/25: 189 lbs. -3/5/25: 186.6 lbs. (a 5% loss in less than 30 days) Review of Resident #224's medical record failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that appropriate competencies related to medication administration was completed for one Licensed Nurse (Nurse #9) out of 5 staff records reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to provide documentation that Nurse #9 had completed the appropriate nursing competencies for medication administration and controlled substances (a drug or chemical that the government regulates for its manufacture, possession and use, that are classified into schedules based on their potential for abuse) documentation. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Management of Controlled Substance in Skilled Nursing Facilities, revised 10/19/2022, indicated: -It is the responsibility of staff to administer or otherwise manage medications to safeguard controlled substances in a manner consistent with Federal and State law, and organizational policy. Purpose: -To provide for proper ordering, storage, disposal, and security of controlled substances. -To minimize the opportunity for abuse or diversion of controlled substances.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation of controlled substance (a drug or chemical that the government regulates for its manufacture, possession and use, that are classified into schedules based on their potential for abuse) for two units (Unit 2, side one and Unit 2, side two) out of five units reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation in the controlled substance register (Narcotic Book Documentation). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Management of Controlled Substance in Skilled Nursing Facilities, revised 10/19/22, indicated: -It is the responsibility of staff to administer or otherwise manage medications to safeguard controlled substances in a manner consistent with Federal and State law, and organizational policy. Purpose: -To provide for proper ordering, storage, disposal and security of controlled substances. -To minimize the opportunity for abuse or diversion of controlled substances. -To promote occupational and patient safety. -Medication information is logged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to provide routine dental services for two Residents (#47 and #186) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #47, the facility staff failed to follow through on a Doctor of Medicine in Dentistry (DMD) recommendation to have the Resident seen by an Oral Surgeon for a tooth extraction resulting in delayed dental care and services. 2. For Resident #186, the facility failed to assist the Resident in making an appointment for recommended dental extractions in a timely manner which resulted in a delay in dental care and increased risk for oral pain and infection. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Consulting Services Podiatry/Dental/Optometry/Audiology, dated 11/22/16, included but was not limited to the following: -The facility has a contract with credentialed providers for inhouse services of podiatry, dental, optometry and audiology. -Facility will arrange appointments as requested by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received food and drink that was palatable and served at an appetizing temperature on two (Unit One and Unit Four) out of four units, where test trays were conducted. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Pureed (food prepared as a smooth, pudding-like texture) asparagus was served consistent with pureed texture and at an appetizing temperature for Residents requiring pureed food on Unit One. 2. For Unit Four, the facility failed to serve palatable food at an appetizing temperature. Findings include: Review of the facility's Standard Guidance for Food and Liquid Textures for Individuals Requiring Modified Texture Diets, undated, indicated the following: -A pureed diet is food with a very smooth consistency or foods that have been well processed in a food processor or blender to a very smooth consistency or texture. -No solid pieces or parts can be noticed in the food. -Pureed food has no lumps and feels very soft and smooth in the mouth. During an interview on 3/18/25 at 8:25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide safety and awareness related to resident's food allergies for two Residents (#163 and #215) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #163, the facility failed to ensure that the Resident with a chocolate allergy was not provided with food that included the documented allergen. 2. For Resident #215, the facility failed to maintain Resident safety relative to a coconut allergy putting him/her at risk for anaphylaxis (a life-threatening allergic reaction). Findings include: 1. Resident#163 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease. Review of the recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #163: -required substantial to max assist to eat his/her meals -long-term memory and short-term memory were impaired. Review of Resident #163's Nursing/Dietary Communication form dated 10/9/24, indicated the Resident was allergic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a Pneumococcal Immunization to one Resident (#25) of five applicable residents, out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to administer an updated Pneumococcal Immunization to Resident #25 within the appropriate timeframe as indicated by CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines placing Resident #25 at increased risk for complications associated with Pneumococcal infection. Findings include: Review of CDC guidelines for Pneumococcal immunization at www.cdc.gov indicated that adults who have received the Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine 23 (PPSV23) Immunization after age [AGE] years should have shared clinical decision making to decide whether to administer Pneumococcal 20-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20) Immunization one year after the PPSV23 had been administered. Review of the facility policy titled Resident Pneumococcal Immunization, dated September 2011, revised 9/1/23, included but was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate nutritional care and services for two Residents (#193 and #60), out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Re-evaluate Resident #193's nutritional needs, identify a severe weight loss, monitor weights as ordered, and accurately monitor meal intake percentages when the Resident had been identified as having a poor appetite, being at nutritional risk, and had experienced a severe weight loss greater than 7.5 percent (%) in less than three months; and 2. For Resident #60, a) provide nutritional supplements as ordered, and b) maintain an accurate weight record in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) in order to identify significant weight loss timely and monitor and assess meal intakes consistently when the Resident was identified at nutritional risk and experienced severe weight loss. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Nutrition Management, dated 12/5/08 and revised 6/6/22, indicated: -The purpose was to provide nutritional care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#156) out of a total sample of 36 residents was assessed to self-administer medication prior to allowing self-administration of his/her medications. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Self Administration of Medication, revised June 30, 2021, indicated the following: -If the resident wishes to self-administer, the Nurse will determine the interdisciplinary team (IDT) will determine the resident's ability to safely self-administer. {sic} -Upon admission the Self-Administration of Medications Informed Consent and Assessment Tool will be completed. Resident #156 was admitted to the facility in May 2022. Review of the Resident's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated the Resident scored a 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) indicating he/she was cognitively intact. During an observation and interview on 1/2/24 at 10:03 A.M., the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to notify the Physician/Non-Physician Practitioner (NPP- Nurse Practitioner) and Dietitian of a severe weight loss of greater than 7.5 percent (%) in less than three months for one Resident (#193) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the NPP and Dietitian of the Resident's severe weight loss when the Resident had been previously identified as being at nutritional risk. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Nutrition Management, dated 12/5/08 and revised 6/6/22, indicated: -The purpose was to provide nutritional care and services to each resident, consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment . to recognize, evaluate, and address the nutritional needs of every resident, including, but not limited to, the resident at risk or currently experiencing impaired nutrition . -Staff will consistently observe and monitor residents for changes . -Consult with the Dietitian when .unplanned weight loss or gain (greater than three pounds (lbs)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to provide or arrange for services that accepted standards of practice dictate should have been provided for two Residents (#6 and #193), out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #6, the facility staff failed to document where subcutaneous (under the skin) injections of Insulin (medication used to treat Diabetes [chronic, metabolic disease characterized by high blood sugar levels]) was administered on the Resident's body, putting the Resident at risk for lipohypertrophy (a lump of fatty tissue under the skin caused by repeated injections in the same area) development. 2. For Resident #193, the facility staff failed to obtain a Pulmonology consult as ordered when the Resident had a history of malignant (potentially deadly condition that will likely worsen with time) breast cancer, was identified to have nodular (growth of abnormal tissue) lesions (area in an organ or tissue which has been damaged due to disease) in both lungs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for one Resident (#108) out of a total sample of 36 residents, with limited range of motion (ROM) to prevent further decrease in ROM. Specifically, for Resident #108, the facility staff failed to re-assess the Resident's condition relative to hand contractures upon return from a hospitalization, and resume Occupational Therapy (OT) when the Resident had known bilateral hand contractures (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity, and rigidity of joints), increasing the risk for further decrease in ROM, impaired skin integrity, and infection. Findings include: Resident #108 was admitted to the facility in February 2023, with diagnoses including Quadriplegia (paralysis that affects all four limbs and body from the neck down) and Respiratory Failure (condition that develops when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record and policy review, the facility failed to notify and solicit the assistance of the appropriate authorities for one Resident (#283), out of four sampled residents, when the Resident left the facility, did not return as indicated, and was unable to be contacted by facility staff. Specifically, the facility staff failed to notify the Police Department when Resident #283 was considered missing for failing to return to the facility from a leave of absence (LOA), and the facility could not verify the Resident whereabouts, care, or safety. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Elopement Prevention and Response revised April 24, 2023, included but was not limited to: -Elopement: when a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without knowledge (i.e., an order for discharge or leave of absence) -Elopement Response: >At first notice that the resident does not seem to be in his/her usual/immediate living space, the resident is considered missing. >If the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the Oxygen flow rate (measurement of how much Oxygen is being administered) was set at the correct liters per minute (LPM - the amount of oxygen flow that is being received) for one Resident (#156), out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure that the Resident's oxygen flow rate was maintained at 2 LPM as prescribed by the Physician, putting him/her at risk for adverse outcomes like hypercapnia (failure of the body to remove carbon dioxide in the blood) and Respiratory Failure (condition that results when the blood does not have enough oxygen or too much carbon dioxide). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, Revised November 3, 2016, indicated the following: -Verify Physician's order of Oxygen administration . Updated AARC Clinical Practice Guidelines at https://www.aarc.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/08/08.07.1063.pdf, titled Precautions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-03-25 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to two Residents (#531 and #532) out of three residents reviewed, prior to discharge from the facility in accordance with Federal Regulations. Specifically, 1. For Residents #531, the facility discharged the Resident following services provided under a Medicare payor source with days remaining in the benefit period without a NOMNC issued. 2. For Resident #532, the facility discharged the Resident following services provided under a Medicare payor source with days remaining in the benefit period without a NOMNC issued. Findings include: Review of the General Notice Information for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS-10123), indicated the following: -SNFs are required to provide a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to beneficiaries when their Medicare covered service(s) are ending. -The NOMNC, Form CMS-10123, is given by the facility to all Medicare beneficiaries at least two days before the end of a Medicare covered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-03-25 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post on a daily basis required nurse staffing information that included the actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff and the daily census. Findings include: The surveyor observed that nurse staffing information was posted in the entry of the facility on the following days: -3/18/25 -3/19/25 -3/23/25 -3/24/25 Review of the nurse staffing information posted indicated the name of the facility, the date, and the total amount of nursing staff working on each unit for the day and evening shift. The posted nurse staffing information was observed to include (2) 3:00 P.M. - 11:00 P.M. (evening) shift staffing and failed to indicate any 11:00 P.M. - 7:00 A.M. (night) shift staffing. Further review of the nurse staffing information postings failed to indicate the actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff and the daily resident census. During an interview on 3/24/25 at 7:29 A.M., the facility Scheduler said she was the one who posted the daily staffing information and she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-01-09 · tag F0641 — widespread
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, records reviewed and policy review, the facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments for two Residents (#114 and #232), and failed to ensure timely completion of Section C (Cognitive Patterns) and Section D (Mood) within the required timeframe for four Residents (#113, #173, #167 and #93), out of a total sample of 40 residents (including 36 active and four closed records). Specifically, 1. For Resident #114, the facility failed to ensure that staff coded the use of Oxygen (O2) therapy on a Quarterly MDS Assessment, as required. 2. For Resident #113, the facility failed to ensure Sections C and D were completed during the assessment reference period, as required. 3. Resident #173, the facility failed to ensure Sections C and D were completed during the assessment reference period, as required. 4. For Resident #232, the facility failed to accurately code the Resident's discharge status on his/her Discharge MDS Assessment when the Resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to INTEGRITUS HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 52.7+1.3 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WILLOWOOD EXTENDED CARE SERVICES INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 02/01/2000
INTEGRITUS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2022
INTEGRITUS HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2022
GINGRAS, MARCIE JOIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF—since 02/01/2022
JONES, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF—since 02/01/1993
CONSOLATI, THOMASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF—since 02/01/2022
KOVACS, JULEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF—since 02/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$27.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$5.8M
Related-party expense21% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 10%Other / private 23%

This home reported $5.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$339per resident / day
operating cost
$10,319per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$345per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 225687. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next