Fairview Commons Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 275 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 27.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 120 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 146 beds and averages 119.0 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.92 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an environment that was free of accident hazards and risks for three Residents (#7, #63, and #67), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, For Resident #7, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation and provide effective interventions and adequate supervision to prevent falls when the Resident was identified as high falls risk due to cognitive impairment, had multiple previous falls including one fall with sustained fractures, and was left unattended in the Activity Room with other residents and sustained a hip fracture requiring hospitalization and surgical intervention.For Resident #63, the facility failed to implement assistive devices and appropriate interventions/notifications during dining to reduce the risks of aspiration (inhalation of foreign materials into the lungs) for the Resident. For Resident #67, who had a history of falls, the facility failed to analyze the reason for the Resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-01-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided repositioning as required to prevent the development of a facility acquired pressure injury for one Resident (#50), out of a sample of 24 residents. Findings include: Resident #50 was admitted to the facility in April 2022 with diagnoses including unspecified Dementia and protein calorie malnutrition (under-nutrition resulting from inadequate intake, digestion or absorption of protein or calories). The Resident was also diagnosed with Covid-19 in January 2023. According to a white paper, copyright November 2022, by Wound Source and HMP Global, Inc., the following pertain to pressure injury: - One of the most critical risk factors for pressure injury (also called a bedsore - an area of injured skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin - people most at risk are those with a condition that limits their ability to change positions), is limited mobility since it exacerbates challenges in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that beverages served during meals were palatable and at appropriate temperatures on three (Unit One, Unit Two and Unit Three) out of three units observed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the temperature of coffee served during meals were palatable when numerous residents had expressed concerns to the Food Service Director (FSD). Findings include: On 7/28/25 from 2:00 P.M. to 3:00 P.M., the surveyor met with residents during a Resident Council Meeting, and the following was discussed: -the coffee/hot beverages were lukewarm during resident meals. On 7/29/25 at 11:22 A.M., the surveyor requested test trays for the lunch meal for Unit One, Unit Two and Unit Three from the FSD. During an interview on 7/29/25 at 11:44 A.M., the FSD said there have been complaints from residents about the temperatures of the coffee/hot water served not being hot enough. The FSD said she has explained to residents that because of safety, and by the instruction of management, they have been unable to serve the hot beverages…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to adhere to infection control standards of practice while serving meals to residents on one Unit (Unit One), out of three Units observed, and maintain a hygienically clean environment to prevent contamination and the spread of infection in the facility laundry room.Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Ensure that staff passing breakfast meal trays in resident rooms on Unit One removed personal protective equipment (PPE: items such as gowns and gloves worn to prevent the spread of infection) after providing care for one Resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), prior to exiting the resident's room, and did not place a previously delivered resident breakfast meal tray in the unit food truck with undelivered resident meals trays to prevent contamination and the potential spread of infections.2. Ensure that the facility laundry room was maintained in a hygienically clean environment when stagnant water, dust laden fans, and windowsills laden with dead bugs and paint chips were observed in the proximity of clean…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for one Resident (#140) out of a total sample of 26 residents.Specifically, for Resident #140, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience during breakfast and lunch meal service when the Resident was dependent on staff for assistance with meals and:-was not served his/her meal at the same time as other residents seated at the same table.-had clothing protectors applied instead of napkins before his/her meal was served. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Nutrition and Meal; Meal Tray Delivery Outside of Dining Room, dated 5/2/05, indicated:-Nursing personnel will monitor residents throughout meals to ensure resident assistance is provided promptly, per individual need. Review of the facility's policy titled Residents' Rights, revised dated 10/4/23, indicated:-A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment, that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement abuse policies and procedures when two Certified Nurse Aides (CNA #8 and CNA #2) documented a potential allegation of abuse pertaining to one Resident (#7), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the allegations of abuse were identified, reported within the required timeframe, and protection was provided to residents pending the outcome of the investigation, when CNA #8 and CNA #2 documented in witness statements that Nurse #4 responded inappropriately to Resident #7 after the Resident sustained a fall.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Accidents and Incidents - Investigating and Reporting, revised 12/29/11, indicated all accidents or incidents involving residents, employees, visitors, vendors, etc., occurring on the premises must be investigated and reported to the Administrator.The policy also included the following:-to ensure accurate reporting, timely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective discharge plan was implemented for post-discharge care for one Resident (#130) out of a total sample of three residents reviewed for closed records. Specifically, for Resident #130, the facility failed to ensure services such as visiting nurse and therapy, were in place when he/she was discharged from the facility when Resident #130 expressed interest in having the services in place for a safe facility discharge and reduce the risk of re-hospitalization. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Discharge Planning, revised 1/24/25, indicated the following: -The purpose of this policy is to establish an effective Discharge planning process that focuses on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of resident to be active participants and effectively transition to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions. >The social services staff, in concert with the interdisciplinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were accurate for three Residents (#4, #7 and #67), out of a total sample of 26 Residents. Specifically, For Resident #4, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment dated [DATE] accurately indicated the daily use of hypoglycemic (medication to lower blood sugar) and antipsychotic (medication to treat mood and behaviors) medications and did not include the use of anticoagulant (medication to thin the blood and prevent blood clotting) medication. For Resident #7, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment dated [DATE] accurately indicated three falls that occurred since the last MDS Assessment. For Resident #67, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment dated [DATE] accurately indicated falls that occurred since the last MDS Assessment.Findings include: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in April 2021 with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus Type 1, Cerebral Infarction (stroke)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided to promote the healing of pressure ulcers for one Resident (#49) out of a total sample of 26 residents.Specifically, for Resident #49, the facility failed to:-adhere to the Physician ordered wound treatment during wound treatment provided on 7/25/25, putting the Resident at risk for potential worsening of the pressure ulcer.-review the Wound Consultant treatment recommendations made on 7/24/25 to discontinue a medicated cream, with the Resident's Primary Medical Practitioner and update wound treatment orders timely, resulting in a delay in updated wound treatment per the Wound Consultant's recommendations. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Skin Integrity Management effective 3/1/2011 and revised 11/15/23, indicated but was not limited to:-Policy: .It is also the policy of this facility, consistent with CMS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice of fluid management for one Resident (#15), out of one applicable resident receiving dialysis (process that filters waste, salt, and fluid from the blood when the kidneys are unable to work adequately) services, out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, for Resident #15, the facility failed to: -Accurately monitor daily fluid intake as ordered by the Physician, when the Resident was dependent on renal dialysis, placing the Resident at risk for medical complications related to fluid overload. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Dialysis Residents, Coordination of Care Of, dated May 2005, and last revised November 2018, indicated: -The nursing facility is responsible for the overall quality of care and services the resident receives and provides the services, consistent with professional standards of practices, to residents receiving…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-16 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required the use of bilateral nephrostomy tubes (a catheter inserted directly into the kidney that drains urine into a collecting bag outside the body), the facility failed to ensure nursing developed and implemented a baseline care plan related to his/her immediate care and treatment needs related to his/her nephrostomy tubes. Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled, Care Planning, revised 02/15/25, included but was not limited to the following:The Facility will develop and implement a Baseline admission Care Plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. The baseline care plan will be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission and will remain in place until the initial Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Care Plan Meeting. All Physician orders inclusive of medications, diagnoses, dietary, and therapy services are considered part of the plan of care.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required the use of bilateral nephrostomy tubes (a catheter inserted directly into the kidney that drains urine into a collecting bag outside the body) the facility failed to ensure he/she received adequate nursing care in accordance with professional standards of practice when there were no Physician's orders related to the care and treatment for his/her nephrostomy tubes. Findings include:Review of [NAME] R. [NAME] H (2019) Nursing care and management of patients with a nephrostomy, Nursing Times [online]; 115:11, 40-43) indicated (but was not limited to) the following:- Nurses need to understand how to care for and manage patients with a nephrostomy. - Nurses need to understand issues around fluid management, infection control and management of the tube and bags. - Patients with nephrostomy tubes are at risk of pyelonephritis (inflammation of the kidney, usually due to infection). They should be monitored for signs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$74,354 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $74,354 — penalty dated 2025-07-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to INTEGRITUS HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA