Linda Manor Extended Care Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 319 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 166 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 114.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #3), whose care plan interventions included the need for two staff members to provide assistance during care, which included incontinence care, bed mobility and repositioning, the Facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented and followed his/her care plan interventions. On 05/04/25, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA #1) provided incontinence care to Resident #3 without another staff member present for assistance, CNA #1 positioned Resident #3 on his/her side, then turned away from the resident, he/she rolled off the bed and fell onto the floor. Resident #3 was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) and diagnosed with a closed displaced fracture (broken pieces of bone that moved away from each other) of the right femoral neck (part of the thigh bone just below the hip joint). Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy titled, Care Planning, last revised 10/18/22, indicated the Facility will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #3), who required the assistance of two staff members for dressing, toileting care needs, bed mobility, and positioning, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance to maintain his/her safety to prevent an incident/accident resulting in a serious injury. On 05/04/25, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 provided care to Resident #3 without having another staff member present for assistance, CNA #1 repositioned Resident #3 onto his/her side in bed, then turned away from Resident #3 to grab something, leaving him/her unattended and he/she rolled off the bed onto the floor. Resident #3 was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) and diagnosed with a closed displaced fracture (broken pieces of bone that moved away from each other) of the right femoral neck (part of the thigh bone just below the hip joint). Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Fall Risk Reduction, dated as revised 11/2/23, indicated but was not limited to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to adhere to safe food practices to prevent contamination of food and beverage items intended for resident consumption in three out of three applicable facility unit kitchenettes. Specifically, the facility failed to implement safe food practices in three out of three facility unit kitchenettes relative to labeling, dating and guidelines for food storage. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dietary Department Guidelines, last updated 5/2018, indicated: >Food Preparation and Handling-Food items should be labeled and use by dated to allow for rotation of supplies.-All items stored in the refrigerator will be covered and use by date labeled.-Refrigerated foods and cold foods will be stored and held at refrigerator temperatures 40 degrees Fahrenheit or below. -Refrigeration temperatures and will be monitored and documented on approved temperature monitoring logs, twice daily.-Frozen foods will be stored between zero and negative ten degrees Fahrenheit. >Foods not prepared in the facility-Personal foods brought…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided care and services according to Physician orders for an indwelling urinary catheter (a thin, soft flexible tube that drains urine from the bladder) for one Resident (#88) out of four applicable residents, in a total sample size of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to insert the correct indwelling urinary catheter size in accordance with Resident #88's Physician order, placing the Resident at risk for obstruction and pain. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Indwelling Urinary Catheters, dated 6/24/25, included but was not limited to:-Urinary catheters should only be placed under the direction of a Physician's order, including catheter size and care. Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses including Obstructive (blockage in the urinary tract preventing normal urination) and Reflux (a backward flow of urine from the bladder into the ureters and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had multiple wounds and required an appointment with an outside wound specialist, the Facility failed to ensure nursing staff clarified and/or followed up on his/her wound consult recommendations related to the need for an X-ray, in a timely manner, which resulted in a delay in treatment. Findings include: Pursuant to Massachusetts General Law (M.G.L.), chapter 112, individuals are given the designation of Registered Nurse and Practical Nurse which includes the responsibility to provide nursing care. Pursuant to the Code of Massachusetts Regulation (CMR) 244, Rules and Regulations 3.02 and 3.04 define the responsibilities and functions of a Registered Nurse and Practical Nurse respectively. The regulations stipulate that both the Registered Nurse and Practical Nurse bear full responsibility for systematically assessing health status and recording the related health data. They also stipulate that both the Registered Nurse and Practical Nurse incorporate into the plan of care and implement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who sustained two unwitnessed falls and whose Comprehensive Care Plan indicated he/she was at risk for dehydration with the potential for slow wound healing due to low albumin (may indicate malnutrition, kidney/liver disease) the Facility failed to ensure they maintained a complete and accurate medical record when 1) nursing did not complete the 72 hour neurological checks following each of his/her unwitnessed falls, and 2) Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) daily documentation related to Resident #1's fluid and food intake were not consistently recorded on his/her flow sheets. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy titled Falls Management: Post Fall, with a revision date of 11/02/23, indicated an Incident and Accident Report would be completed after each resident fall. Review of the Facility's Incident and Accident Report Form indicated to initiate neurological checks (assessment used to determine head injury) when a resident sustained an unwitnessed fall or head strike. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who was assessed by nursing to be at risk for skin breakdown with actual pressure injuries (localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence which can present as intact skin or an open ulcer and may be painful) the Facility failed to ensure nursing adequately assessed, measured and obtained Physician's orders related to wound care to his/her bilateral heels that included specifics related to treatments for offloading, in accordance with professional standards of practice in an effort to promote wound healing. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled Skin Integrity Management, dated 12/03/23, indicated the following: -Stage 1 Pressure Injury: A persistent area of redness that does not disappear when pressure is removed. Skin is not broken, the site may be tender, painful, firm, or soft, warm, or cool compared to surrounding skin. -Stage 2 Pressure Injury: Partial-thickness skin loss involving the outer layer of the skin and the inner layer,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed to be at risk for nutritional decline, dehydration, and with the potential slow wound healing due to low albumin (may indicate malnutrition, kidney/liver disease), the Facility failed to ensure Resident #1's nutritional status including body weight, meal percentage and fluid intakes, were accurately assessed and monitored appropriately by nursing and per facility policy. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Weighing and Measuring Resident, with a revision date of 05/03/11, indicated the following: -Residents will be weighed using consistent scale on admission and at least monthly thereafter. -Reweigh will be obtained if weight is +/- three pounds (lbs.) from previous weight. Review of the Facility Policy titled Nutrition Management, with a revision date of 06/06/22, indicated the following: -Identify residents who have functional limitations which may affect ability to eat or drink…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the Physician of the unavailability of an ordered medication for one Resident (#1) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to notify the Physician when Resident #1's Fluoxetine (a psychotropic medication used to treat Depression) medication was unavailable to be administered in accordance with his/her Physician orders, resulting in the Resident not receiving five scheduled doses of Fluoxetine medication. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in June 2024, with a diagnosis of Depression (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #1 was moderately cognitively impaired as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine out of a total score of 15. Review of the current…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded for four Residents (#88, #12, #89, and #110) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Accurately code that Resident #88 was receiving Hemodialysis (also known as dialysis: a procedure where a machine with a special filter called a dialyzer is used to remove waste products and fluids from the blood). 2. Accurately code an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder used to drain urine outside the body) usage for Resident #12 and Resident #89. 3. Accurately code the discharge disposition for Resident #110. Findings include: 1. Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in May 2023, with a diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD - a medical condition where the kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life) and was dependent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to provide nutrition care and services for one Resident (#264) out of a total sample of 24 residents, when the Resident was determined to be at risk for malnutrition. Specifically, the facility staff failed to perform monthly weight measurements for Resident #264 as ordered for June 2024, resulting in a significant weight loss being missed and a delay of nutritional interventions. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Nutrition Management last revised June 2022 indicated the following: -staff will consistently observe and monitor residents for changes and implement revisions to care plan as needed. -to recognize, evaluate and address the nutritional needs of every resident, including but not limited to, the resident at risk or currently experiencing impaired nutrition. -address any immediate concern with the dietician and physician. -use the Dietician Consult Request to initiate a consult with Dietician when indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dental care and services as required for one Resident (#16) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to provide assistance with scheduling and maintaining dental services for Resident #16, when the Resident had consents for dental care and services. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Consulting Services, Podiatry/Dental/Optometry/Audiology, dated 11/22/16, indicated the following: -The facility has a contract with credentialed providers for in house services of dental. -Services are offered to all residents as a means of providing the highest practicable level of functioning and care. -Residents/representatives are provided information about consulting services on admission and at any time the need arrives. -Residents/representatives provide written consent to treatment prior to initiation of services. -Appointments are arranged by facility staff. -Transportation is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,788 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,788 — penalty dated 2025-06-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to INTEGRITUS HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA