Charlene Manor Extended Care Facility
130 Colrain Road, Greenfield, MA 01301 · Non profit - Corporation · 123 certified beds · (413) 774-3724 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $127,926 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-26)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.2% | 16.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.8% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 15.9% | 15.5% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.5% | 3.4% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 28.1% | 15.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.6% | 19.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.1% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.2% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 34.3% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.9% | 21.4% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.4% | 77.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.5% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.9% | 11.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.56 | 1.88 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.08 | 1.50 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 219 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 46.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 107 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.7%CMS range 47.0–58.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.4%CMS range 10.4–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 48.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 35.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.4%CMS range 4.5–10.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 115.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.94 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-02-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that appropriate services to maintain or improve range of motion were implemented for two Residents (#21 and #93) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #21, the facility failed to ensure the Physician's orders were followed relative to the use of the right wrist/hand and left-hand orthosis (device used externally that aids in body alignment and/or function), resulting in worsening bilateral hand contractures, and physical pain for the Resident. 2. For Resident #93, the facility failed to ensure the right-hand orthosis recommended by the Occupational Therapist (OT) was being applied for use by the Resident as required, placing the Resident at risk of worsening contractures. Findings include: The facility staff failed to implement the consistent use of a left-hand carrot orthosis and apply the right-hand wrist and hand orthosis (splint) for Resident #21 as ordered by the Physician and follow the care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-11-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to prevent and treat pressure ulcers (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) and prevent further skin and pressure injury for two Residents (#26 and #53), of four applicable residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #26: -offload (minimizing or removing any weight or force to help prevent and heal pressure ulcers) pressure on his/her buttocks and provide repositioning and assistance out of bed daily per Resident's plan of care to reduce the risk of developing pressure ulcers per the comprehensive plan of care and Resident preference/request. -assess the Resident's skin when he/she complained of buttocks discomfort. -implement interventions per professional standards of care and practice when a pressure ulcer was identified,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who was admitted to the Facility for a short term stay and had a history of aggression, the Facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan included interventions, goal and outcomes related to his/her inappropriate and aggressive behaviors directed at and involving other residents, and discharge planning. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Resident to Resident Altercation, dated as revised 03/20/09, indicated a system to follow-up on all altercations with an emphasis to prevent future altercations will be in place such as, care plans will be updated to incorporate recommendations from the formal incident review process in addition to immediate updates that may have occurred at the time of or proactively prior to the altercation. Review of the Facility Policy titled Care Planning, dated as revised 02/15/25, indicated that Care Planning includes a standardized discharge process to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled Residents (Resident #1), who sustained an unwitnessed fall, the facility failed to ensure they maintained a complete and accurate medical record when nursing did not complete the 72-hour neurological checks following his/her unwitnessed fall, per facility policy. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy titled Falls Management: Post Fall, with a revision date of 09/30/24, indicated an Incident and Accident Report would be completed after each resident fall. Review of the Facility's Incident Report Checklist indicated for nursing to initiate neurological checks (assessment used to determine head injury) when a resident sustained a head injury or unwitnessed fall by utilizing the Neuro Check Sheet. Review of the Neurological Check Flowsheet indicated to assess the following with each check: - Level of consciousness - Pupil response - Motor response (hand grasps) - Pain response - Vital signs (blood pressure, temperature, pulse and respiration) Further review of the Flowsheet indicated the neurological checks…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that an appropriate Hoyer pad (seating device used to assist in transferring a resident using a mechanical lift) was available to assist in transferring one Resident (#26), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide an appropriate sized Hoyer Pad to assist in transferring Resident #26 out of bed based on his/her preferences and Rehabilitation recommendations to get out of bed resulting in the Resident remaining bedbound and increasing the risk for discomfort and skin breakdown. Findings include: Review of the facility Policy titled Activities of Daily Living, effective date 11/14/16, indicated: -Each resident will receive the necessary care and services to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing, consistent with resident's comprehensive assessment and plan of care. -The facility will provide care and services for the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Unit (Homestead) out of three units observed, had sufficient staff members to meet the needs of the unit residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -sufficient staff were available to assist with Activity of Daily Living (ADL: basic skills needed in daily life and include eating, bathing, toileting and grooming/personal hygiene) for residents residing on the Homestead Unit. Findings include: During the initial pool process on 11/3/24, the following observations/interviews were obtained on the Homestead Unit: 1. On 11/3/24 at 11:36 A.M., a Resident (who requested to be anonymous) said sometimes when he/she rings the call bell to alert staff that he/she needed help, it could take hours for someone to assist him/her. The Resident said he/she required assistance from staff with toileting needs, that this did not occur on all shifts and the occurances vary. The Resident said it bothered him/her when the staff do not answer his/her request for assistance when ringing the call bell. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure unit kitchenette cleanliness and safety was maintained on two units (Meadows Unit and [NAME] Unit) out of three unit kitchenettes observed. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For the Meadows Unit, ensure the kitchenette refrigerator and toaster were cleaned as required, and broken and/or missing refrigerator equipment were addressed, repaired and replaced. 2. For the [NAME] Unit, ensure the toaster was cleaned as required to maintain the equipment in a clean and safe manner. Findings include: 1. On 11/3/24 at 9:36 A.M., the surveyor observed the following in the Meadows Unit kitchenette: -Refrigerator had one broken and one missing crisper drawer. -Food debris was noted on the inside shelves of the refrigerator door and on the bottom of the inside refrigerator floor. -A dirty plate discarded on the top of the refrigerator. -Toaster was thickly laden with crumbs inside. On 11/4/24 at 2:10 P.M., the surveyor observed the following in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that dignity and privacy was maintained for one Resident (#26), out of a total sample of 25 residents and on one unit (Unit 2) out of three units observed. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) ensure staff provided privacy for Resident #26 while assessing and providing care to the Resident's buttocks. 2) ensure staff were seated while assisting residents during meals in the Unit 2 dining room. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Residents' Rights Policy, revised October 2023, indicated the following: -A resident has the right to a dignified existence -The resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity -The resident has a right to personal privacy 1) Resident #26 was admitted to the facility in April 2013, with diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis (MS: a chronic autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system marked by numbness, weakness, loss of muscle coordination, and problems with vision,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the Physician and/or responsible party of a change in condition for three Residents (#2, #88, and #43) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Notify Resident #2's Physician, in a timely manner, of a change in the Resident's condition when the Resident experienced complications with his/her indwelling (inside one's body) urinary catheter (tube used to drain urine from the bladder into a bag outside of one's body), resulting in a delay in treatment. 2. Notify the Physician and the Resident's Representative timely about a blister that was identified on Resident #88's inner leg. 3. Notify Resident #43''s Resident Representative of multiple dental infections which required medical intervention of several courses of treatment with antibiotics. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Physician Notification, dated 11/11/09 and revised September 2011, indicated the following: -Upon identification of a resident who has clinical changes, change in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC: notice issued to a resident who is receiving benefits under Medicare Part A when all covered services end) and/or Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN: notice issued to a resident when a facility determines the beneficiary no longer qualifies for Medicare Part A skilled services and the resident has not used all his/her Medicare benefit days) were issued for one Resident (#107), out of three residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to issue: A. The NOMNC to Resident #107's Health Care Proxy (HCP- the person chosen as the healthcare decision maker when the individual is unable to do so for themself) when the Resident was determined to lack the capacity to make medical decisions. B. The SNF ABN notice to Resident #107's HCP so the HCP could decide if they wished to continue receiving skilled services that may not be paid for by Medicare, and were aware of the financial responsibility they may have to assume.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that two Residents (#99 and #43) out of a total sample of 25 residents, were free of physical restraints, putting the Residents at potential risk of accidental falls and injury. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #99, assess for the use of bilateral half middle (placement in the middle of the bed) side rails (side rails: adjustable position, rigid bars that attach to the sides of a bed, ranging in sizes from full to one-half, one-quarter, or one-eighth lengths) while in bed which prevented the Resident from exiting the bed, and were not the quarter side rails as ordered by the Physician. 2. For Resident #43, assess the use of wedge cushions (a triangular shaped cushion used to aid in positioning for health issues or comfort) placement on the bed and one side of the Resident's bed positioned against the wall being used as potential restraints. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Restraint Management, revised 12/16/16, indicated the interdisciplinary team will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide required documentation to the receiving hospital for one Resident (#73) of one applicable closed record, out of a sample of three closed records, when Resident #73's medical needs could not be met at the facility, and he/she required transfer to the hospital. Specifically, the facility failed to provide evidence that the required transfer documentation to ensure a safe and effective transition of care was provided to the receiving hospital when Resident #73 was transferred to the hospital from the facility. Findings include: Resident #73 was admitted to the facility in May 2024. Review of Resident #73's Nursing Progress Note, dated 5/29/24, indicated the following: -The Resident complained of discomfort and multiple episodes of non-productive coughing. -A new order for Mucinex was obtained and scheduled Acetaminophen had been administered as ordered. -The Resident's temperature was 103.1 degrees axillary (under the arm). -The on-call Physician was notified and gave an order to transfer the Resident to the hospital.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one Resident (#73) out of a sample of three closed resident records reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for Resident #73 within 48 hours of admission to the facility, when a comprehensive care plan was not developed in place of a baseline care plan, to provide effective and person-centered care of the Resident. Findings include: Resident #73 was admitted to the facility in May 2024, with diagnoses including Unspecified Fall and Displaced (out of alignment or in several pieces) Intertrochanteric (top of the thigh bone, where the hip and thigh meet) Fracture (cracking or breaking) of Right Femur (thigh bone). Review of Resident #73's Baseline admission Care Plan, dated 5/26/24, indicated the following: -The Resident's date of birth . -The Resident's date of admission to the facility. -The Resident's medical history. -The Resident's Physician's name and contact information. Further review of the Baseline Care Plan indicated that no other sections of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team (IDT), and included the Resident and/or Resident's Representative for three Residents (#17, #92, and #88) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, facility failed to provide evidence that: 1. Resident #17 and/or his/her Representative were invited and attended/did not attend two separate care plan meetings held for the Resident. 2. Resident #92's care plan was reviewed and revised by the IDT following one Resident Assessment completed. 3. Resident #88's care plan was reviewed and revised by the IDT following two separate Resident Assessments completed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Planning, dated 10/1/10 and revised 10/28/22, indicated the following: -A letter will be sent to each resident or resident representative inviting them to the care plan meeting. -Each discipline reviews the overall plan and any concerns prior to the care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with personal hygiene for two Residents (#88 and #43) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #88 and #43 were offered and/or provided with grooming assistance when both Residents required the assistance of staff for grooming activities. Findings include: 1. Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in August 2022, with diagnoses including Dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life) and Parkinson's Disease (a progressive degenerative disorder of the central nervous system characterized by tremor and impaired muscular coordination) with Dyskinesia (uncontrolled, involuntary movements of the face, arms or legs). Review of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL: basic skills needed in daily life and include eating, bathing, toileting and grooming/personal hygiene) Care Plan, initiated 8/25/22, indicated Resident #88 had decreased ability to perform ADLs due to decreased cognition and mobility. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#88) out of a total sample of 25 sampled residents, received care and services consistent with professional standards of practice relative to completing a timely assessment and obtaining treatment orders for an identified skin issue. Specifically, the facility identified Resident #88 had a quarter sized fluid filled blister on his/her right lower leg and failed to assess the cause of the blister, notify the Physician and Responsible Party timely and obtain treatment orders to assist in healing, increasing the risk of potential further skin decline and infection. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Skin Integrity Management, revised November 2023, indicated based on the comprehensive assessment of the resident, the facility must ensure that the resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcer or injury and does not develop pressure ulcer or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer assistance in scheduling an appointment to ensure good foot health was maintained for one Resident (#78) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, for Resident #78, the facility failed to offer podiatry services to maintain good foot health when the Resident was at risk for decline in his/her foot health related to a history of Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD - a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs) and below the knee amputation (surgically cutting off a limb). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Consulting services, Podiatry/Dental/Optometry/Audiology, approved date 12/22/16, indicated the following: -Resident/Resident Representative are provided information about consulting services upon admission and at any time when need arrives. Resident #78 was admitted to the facility in September 2024, and had diagnoses of PVD, Sepsis (a life-threatening medical emergency that occurs when an infection triggers the body's immune…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#53) out of a total sample of 25 residents, was free from potential accidental hazards when the Resident was allowed to store an Albuterol Sulfate inhaler (aerosolized bronchodilator medication) on his/her bedside table and use the inhaler without assessment or supervision. Specifically, for Resident #53, the facility failed to ensure: -that a prescribed Albuterol Sulfate inhaler was kept in a secured medication cart and not at the Resident's bedside. -the Resident was assessed to self-administer the medication, and was aware of precautions like an increased heart rate and/or difficulty breathing that could result from the medication use or overuse. -that the inhaler was not easily accessible to the Resident and potentially other residents when it was left on Resident #53's bedside table to be administered without Physician approval and without Licensed Staff supervision. Findings include: Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services relative to an indwelling urinary catheter, for one Resident (#2) out of a total sample of 25 residents, which increased the Resident's risk for indwelling urinary catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine outside the body). complications and resulted in a delay in treatment. Specifically, facility staff failed to: -Follow hospital discharge instructions for Resident #2 to attend a scheduled appointment with the Urologist. -Consult the Physician when Resident #2 experienced urinary leakage (complication that can occur when a urinary catheter becomes dislodged or obstructed) outside of his/her indwelling urinary catheter system when the Resident's plan of care did not contain specific instructions to manage indwelling urinary catheter leakage. -Provide timely treatment to correct indwelling urinary catheter complications when the Resident's indwelling urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure recommendations made by the facility Dietitian were followed for one Resident (#104), out of a total sample of 25 residents, who experienced a significant weight loss and was at risk for further decline. Specifically, for Resident #104, the facility failed to ensure that weekly weights were obtained when recommended by the Dietitian after the Resident experienced a significant weight loss of 13.44% in five months. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Nutrition Management, revised 9/30/24, indicated the following: -Review dietitian's recommendations. -Obtain orders per recommendations. -If Medical Doctor (MD) does not want to follow recommendations, document explanation in nursing note. Resident #104 was admitted to the facility in January 2024, with diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes (DM II - condition in which the body does not produce enough insulin hormone and has trouble controlling blood sugar levels), Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure correct use of bed rails (side rails: adjustable position, rigid bars that attach to the sides of a bed, ranging in sizes from full to one-half, one-quarter, or one-eighth lengths) for one Resident (#2) out of a total sample 25 residents. Specifically, facility failed to provide quarter size bed rails for Resident #2, as ordered by the Physician, when facility staff positioned bed rails for Resident #2 in the upward half-rail position at the middle of the bed bilaterally, increasing the Resident's risk for limited mobility and injury. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Side Rails - Assessment and Use of, dated 8/2005 and revised 10/17/17, indicated the following: -The facility provides an optimum safe sleeping environment for the resident. -Individual resident needs for side rails were considered. -Side rails may be an enabler, a restraint, or both. -Use of side rails requires an assessment of the resident's mobility and cognitive functioning to determine the category of use and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all Licensed Nurses had appropriate competencies relative to indwelling urinary catheter care and services for one Resident (#2) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, facility failed to ensure that Nurse #5 was assessed for competency to care for residents with indwelling urinary catheters when: -The Facility Assessment indicated facility staff had been determined to be clinically competent in caring for residents with genitourinary conditions requiring indwelling catheters. -Resident #2 had an indwelling urinary catheter, experienced an indwelling urinary catheter complication of urinary leakage, and required intervention to correct the urinary catheter leakage. -Nurse #5 was responsible for providing care for Resident #2, assessed that the Resident had urinary catheter leakage, was unfamiliar with the urinary catheter placement and did not obtain Physician orders to address the urinary leakage resulting in delayed treatment and increasing the Resident's risk for further indwelling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#419) was free from unnecessary drug administration. Specifically, facility failed to administer Oxycodone (highly addictive opioid medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) dosage and pain scale parameters as ordered by the Physician, in accordance with Resident #419's reported pain level, which resulted in the Resident receiving one excessive dose of Oxycodone and increased the Resident's risk for health complications. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Administration Procedures for All Medications, dated 9/20/13, indicated the following: -The purpose was to administer all medications in a safe and effective manner. -Check the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for order. -Read the medication label three times . compare the label to the MAR. -Refer to the MAR for instruction details. Review of the Department of Justice/Drug Enforcement Administration Oxycodone Drug Fact Sheet reviewed at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#99) out of a total sample of 25 residents, was free from a significant medication error when a dose of Vitamin K medication was administered to the Resident and resulted in sub-therapeutic (dose or concentration of a drug lower than that usually prescribed to treat a disease effectively) laboratory levels. Specifically, for Resident #99, the facility failed to ensure that Vitamin K medication was not administered to the Resident when there was no Physician orders for the medication to be administered after a one time dose order was given. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Administration Procedures for All Medications, dated 9/20/13, indicated the purpose of the policy was to administer mediations in a safe and effective manner. Review of the facility policy titled Anticoagulant Therapy, revised 7/17/19, indicated anticoagulant therapy is the administration of medications (for example Coumadin or Warfarin) that reduce the tendency of blood to coagulate (become thicker so it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that dental services were provided for two Residents (#88 and #43), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #88, provide regular bi-annual dental visits as requested by the Resident Representative. 2. For Resident #43, ensure dental services were offered to the Resident's Representative when the Resident had complaints of mouth and dental pain and required antibiotic treatments. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Consulting Services, Podiatry/Dental/Optometry/Audiology, dated 12/22/16, indicated the facility has a contract with credentialed providers for in house services of podiatry, dental, optometry, and audiology. The policy also included: -Services will be offered to all residents as a means of providing highest practicable level of functioning and care. -Resident/Resident Representative are provided information about consulting services upon admission and at any time when the need arrives. -Resident/Resident Representative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control standards to prevent the potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two Residents (#108 and #2) out of a total sample of 25 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) ensure Resident #108's over-bed table was cleaned and disinfected before used to eat and drink off after a used urinal was set on the table. 2) ensure Resident #2's indwelling urinary catheter (a device inserted into the bladder to drain urine) was maintained off the floor. Findings include: 1) Review of the facility policy titled Nutrition and Meals, Assisting Residents with, dated May 2005, indicated the following: -If the resident eats in his/her room: >clean the over-bed table . Resident #108 was admitted to the facility in June 2024, with diagnoses including Cerebral Infarction due to Thrombosis (a condition where a blood clot caused loss of blood flow and damage to the brain). On 11/4/24 at 8:40 A.M., the surveyor observed CNA #2 enter Resident #108's room. The surveyor observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide evidence that updated COVID-19 vaccines were offered to three Residents (#5, #92, and #61) out of five applicable sampled residents, in a total sample of 25 residents, which increased the Residents' risks for illness. Specifically, the facility failed to provide evidence that a second dose of 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccine was offered to Resident's #5, #92, and #61, according to National Standards, when: -Each Resident received one dose of the 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccine. -the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended an additional dose of updated (2023-2024 formula) of COVID-19 vaccine be administered for older adults,aged [AGE] years and older. -Each Resident met criteria for a second dose of the 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccine. -The COVID-19 vaccine was not medically contraindicated and the residents had not already been immunized with the recommended additional dose. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations (which included taking photographs) interviews and records reviewed, for three out of three resident units, the facility failed to ensure it provided a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for it's residents, when during the course of the survey observations conducted in common areas, resident rooms and resident care areas, the surveyors observed obvious signs of various stages of disrepair, aging and unclean conditions, in carpets, flooring, walls and moldings, and furniture, all of which were in areas accessed and utilized by residents in their daily lives, and were either unclean, unsafe, in need of immediate repair and/or created potentially hazardous conditions, none of which supported that a homelike environment was being provided for facility residents. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Housekeeping and Maintenance Department Responsibilities, dated September 2011, indicated it is important to maintain a clean, safe, and sanitary environment for our…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-28 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed, interviews, and observations, the Facility failed to ensure they developed, implemented and maintained a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that was comprehensive, ensured the residents' environment was maintained to promote a clean, safe, homelike environment, and was focused on indicators of quality of life for residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Facility's undated policy titled QAPI Plan, indicated the following: -Purpose: To take a proactive approach to continually improve the way we care for and engage with our residents, caregivers, and other partners so that we may realize our vision to create exceptional experiences causing those we serve to always prefer us. To do this, all employees will participate in ongoing QAPI efforts to support our mission by ensuring we fulfill the needs of the population we serve. -QAPI includes all employees, all departments and all services provided. -QAPI focuses on systems and processes, rather than…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2), who was severely cognitively impaired, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed their Abuse Prohibition Policy, when on 10/30/23 Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 witnessed an alleged incident of physical abuse involving Nurse #1 and Resident #2 but did not immediately report the incident to his or her supervisor per facility policy, therefore placing Resident #2 and other residents at risk for abuse. Findings Include: Review of the Facility's Policy, dated as revised 02/27/17, titled Resident Abuse Prevention, Investigation and Reporting indicated that all staff who suspect abuse, neglect, mistreatment and or misappropriation must immediately make an oral report to his or her supervisor. The Policy indicated the following: -All employees are responsible for identifying and reporting immediately to their supervisor any witnessed abuse or allegation of abuse they are told about by residents, families, visitors, or other staff. -When an employee believes that he or she has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of four sampled residents (Resident #1), who sustained a fall that resulted in a right hip fracture, and several weeks later sustained a large hematoma (a collection or pooling of blood outside of the blood vessel) to his/her left lower leg the Facility failed to 1) ensure nursing assessed Resident #1 after the fall and before transferring him/her up off of the floor, placing him/her at an increased risk for injury, 2) ensure nursing monitored Resident #1's left lower leg hematoma for any changes or deterioration and 3) ensure nursing completed an incident/injury report when staff identified Resident #1's new left lower leg hematoma. Findings include: Review of the Facility policy, Accidents and Incidents-Investigating and Reporting, dated 12/29/11, indicated the following: -Regardless of how minor an accident or incident may be, including injuries of an unknown source, report the accident/incident to the department supervisor as soon as such accident/incident is discovered or when information of such accident/incident is learned.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of two sampled employee personnel files (Certified Nurse Aide, CNA #1), the Facility staff failed to ensure CNA #1 received training on the facility procedures for reporting suspected abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property as required by Federal Regulations, and in accordance with Facility Policy. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Training Policy, dated as reviewed 10/27/22, indicated it is the policy of the Facility to support a training program throughout the organization which includes education and competencies for all new and existing staff, individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement, and volunteers consistent with their expected roles. The Policy indicated that required training will include Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Prevention & Reporting. The Policy indicated that when considering individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement, training conducted by parent organization-affiliate should obtain necessary details regarding this training. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespreadEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident designated smoking area complied with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance for a safe smoking area. Specifically, the facility failed to provide readily available safety equipment including access to a fire extinguisher and a safe, designated smoking area for all smoking residents. Findings include: Review of the CMS circular letter, dated November 10, 2011, titled Smoking Safety in Long Term Care Facilities indicated but was not limited to the following: -The facility is obligated to ensure the safety of designated smoking areas which includes protection of residents from weather conditions and non-smoking residents from secondhand smoke. -The facility is also required to provide portable fire extinguishers in all facilities (NFPA101, 2000 ed., 18/19.3.5.6). Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Smoking Policy dated 7/15/22, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Smoking is never allowed inside the facility and is allowed only in designated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure over that over the counter medications (OTC-medications that can be purchased without a prescription) and medical supplies that included needles were secured and accessible to authorized personnel only. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that the first floor medical supply room was safe and secure and did not provide an accidental and safety hazard to residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Storage of Medications, revised on 6/10/22 indicated the following in part: - .medication supplies are locked or attended by persons with authorized access. On 9/13/23 at 4:50 P.M., two surveyors observed the medical supply room door (located on the first floor, in the center of the building where the three hallways merged) to be opened and unattended. The supply room was easily accessible to residents, staff, and visitors. The surveyors noted the room had many medical supplies including boxes of needles and an unlocked metal cabinet containing a supply of OTC medications. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that: 1) the main dining room provided a homelike environment for the residents and their visitors. 2) the kitchenettes on two out of the three Units (Meadows Rehab and [NAME]) remained sanitary. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Clinical Services Resident Rights Policy, revised on 9/19/22, indicated the following: .The resident has the right to a safe, clean, and comfortable and homelike environment . Review of the facility policy titled Environmental Services Guidelines, dated 9/2011 indicated the following: -All horizontal surfaces such as .counters, sinks, floors etc . will be cleaned daily . -Horizontal surfaces will also be cleaned as needed when spills or soiling occur. 1) During an interview on 9/12/23 (prior to the start of survey) the Ombudsman noted that there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were accurately coded for the use of an anticoagulant (medication that help prevent blood clots), for two Residents (#8 and #95), out of five applicable resident records. Findings include: 1. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with diagnoses including Coronary Artery Disease (CAD-damage or disease in the heart's major blood vessels) and Heart Failure (HF-a chronic condition in which the heart muscle cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 8/14/22, indicated in Section N that the Resident received an anticoagulant in the last seven days. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated in Section N that the Resident received an anticoagulant in the last seven days. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated in Section N that the Resident received an anticoagulant in the last seven days. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and records reviewed for one Resident (#58) out of a total sample of 24 residents, the facility failed to ensure that services provided met professional standards of quality. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a medication was given on an empty stomach per manufacturer guidance. Findings include: Review of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website titled Prilosec (OTC-over the counter also known as Omeprazole) a medication used to treat Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD- a condition in which stomach contents such as acid back up into the esophagus [a muscular tube that brings food from the mouth into the stomach] which can cause heart burn/indigestion) Information, content current as of 11/27/15, indicated the following: -Swallow one tablet with a glass of water before eating in the morning. Resident #58 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with a diagnosis of GERD. During an observation and interview on 9/13/23 at 9:53 A.M., the surveyor observed the Resident in his/her room with his/her breakfast tray in front…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Hospice services were ordered and provided for one Resident (#122), out of two applicable closed records. Specifically, the facility staff failed to enroll Resident #122 for Hospice Care and ensure the provision of appropriate end-of-life services. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Hospice Program, revised 3/28/22, included, but not limited to: -When clinically appropriate, a Medical Doctor (MD) order is requested for Hospice evaluation. A visit/interview with the resident/family may be conducted to determine the resident's wishes relative to participation in the hospice program. -When a resident participates in the Hospice program, a coordinated Care Plan between the facility, Hospice agency and the resident/family will be developed and shall include directives for managing pain and other comfort measures. The Care Plan shall be revised and updated as necessary to reflect the resident's current status. Resident #122 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards for one Resident (#109), out of one applicable resident, out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to coordinate delivery of medications with Resident #109's dialysis (procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) treatment schedule to ensure the Resident received all medications as ordered by the Physician. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Dialysis Resident, Coordination of Care, dated 12/22/16 indicated the following: -Care plan will include medication management before, during or after dialysis per physician orders. Resident #109 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with a diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD-when the kidneys are no longer able to work at the level needed for day-to-day life). Review of the medical record indicated the Resident received Dialysis treatments every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday at an off-site…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-18 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record and policy reviewed for two Residents (#3 and #8) out of a total sample of 24 residents, the facility failed to ensure residents who are trauma survivors received trauma informed care in accordance with professional standards. Specifically, the facility failed to conduct a trauma-informed assessment per facility policy for Resident #3 and Resident #8, who were both diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Trauma Informed Care dated 11/28/19, indicated the following: -Trauma-informed care assessment will be conducted by Social Services upon admission, quarterly, annually and with significant status change only when known PTSD diagnosis or manifestation or verbalization of trauma. -Interdisciplinary team (IDT) to provide ongoing assessment, evaluation, and revision of care plan . 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in November 2019 with the following diagnoses: anxiety, Major Depressive Disorder and PTSD. Review of Resident #3's medical records indicated no documented evidence that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for one Resident (#119), out of a total sample of 24 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to administer daily regimen medications as ordered by the Physician putting the Resident at risk for pain, elevated blood pressure, blood clots and alteration in mood. Findings include: Resident #119 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses including displaced fracture of the head of right radius (a bone in the right forearm) and unspecified fracture of left radius (bone in the left forearm). Review of the Physician's orders dated 9/1/23 through 9/31/23 indicated the following: -Allopurinol 200 milligrams (mg) one tablet oral once daily for Gout. -Amlodipine 10mg one tablet oral daily for hypertension (HTN - high blood pressure). -Atorvastatin Calcium 20mg one tablet oral once daily for hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). -Enoxaparin sodium 40mg solution subcutaneous injection (beneath the skin into the fatty tissue) once daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate medical records were kept for two Residents (#99 and #95), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #99, the facility staff failed to correctly transcribe a medication dose into the Narcotic Log Book. 2. For Resident #95, the facility staff failed to ensure the Resident's care plan matched the Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST-a medical form that relays instructions about life sustaining treatment). Findings include: 1. Resident #99 was admitted into the facility in October 2021. During an observation on 9/14/23 at 3:45 P.M. of a medication administration pass for Resident #99, Nurse #5 administered Marinol (used to treat severe nausea, vomiting and loss of appetite), five milligrams (mg), one capsule by mouth. After administering the 5 mg Marinol, Nurse #5 signed out the Marinol dose on a Narcotic Log Book page that indicated the Marinol blister card (pre-formed packaging used for medications) contained 2.5 mg tablets. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control measures related to the maintenance of respiratory equipment for one Resident (#32), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility staff did not ensure that Resident #32's nebulizer equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner, to decrease the risk of contamination and infection. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen and Respiratory Equipment, dated 2/27/23, indicated the following: -It is the policy of this facility to maintain respiratory therapy equipment according to manufacturer recommendations and accepted standards of practice. -Respiratory equipment used on an as needed (PRN) basis should be contained when not in use to prevent accidental contamination, for example being dropped on the floor. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-a type of progressive long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe). Review of Physician's orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-11-06 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post nursing staff data daily, at the start of each shift, relative to licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. Specifically, the facility failed to post this data, in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors, to include: a) total number and hours for Registered Nurses (RNs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs), and b) resident census. Findings include: On 11/4/24 at 8:15 A.M., the surveyor observed the daily staffing report posted on the door of the front office next to the facility lobby. The daily staffing report posted failed to include staffing data including the facility census, the total number and hours for RNs and LPNs, and the total hours for CNAs, as required. The daily staffing report indicated the number of Licensed staff and number of unlicensed staff only. On 11/5/24 at 9:20 A.M., the surveyor observed the daily staffing report posted on the door of the front office next to the facility lobby. The daily staffing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-11-06 · tag F0637 — patternAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set [MDS] Assessments (SCSA) were completed for three Residents (#104, #84, and #88) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #104, ensure a SCSA was completed when the Resident had a decline in his/her memory, activities of daily living (ADLs), and bowel and bladder. 2. For Resident's #84 and #88, ensure SCSAs were completed when both Residents signed onto Hospice (a program that gives special care to people who are near the end of life and have stopped treatment to cure or control their disease) services. Findings include: Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.18.11, dated October 2023 indicated the following: -The SCSA is a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed when the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) has determined that a resident meets the significant change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments for one Resident (#17), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, for Resident #17, the facility failed to accurately code the indication for use of an antipsychotic (medication that alters brain chemistry to reduce psychotic symptoms) medication and an antidepressant (medication that treat Depression and other conditions) medication on one MDS Assessment. Findings include: 1. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual, Chapter 3, Section N: Medications, dated October 2024, indicated the following: -The intent of the items in this Section is to record the number of days, during the last seven days (lookback period) . that . select medications were received by the resident. -High risk drug classes included antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. -If the resident is taking medications in high risk drug…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and records reviewed for one Resident (#19) out of a sample of three residents, the facility failed to issue a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN - A notice issued to inform a resident and/or resident representative of his/her financial liability to the facility when he/she transitioned off Medicare benefits and remains in the facility). Findings include: Resident #19 was admitted to the facility in July 2023. Review of the SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review completed by the facility indicated Resident #19's Medicare benefit ended on 8/16/23 and he/she remained in the facility after that date. During an interview on 9/13/23 at 4:20 P.M., the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse said a SNFABN should have been issued to Resident #19 or their Representative since he/she remained in the facility after his/her Medicare benefit ended but no SNFABN was issued, as required.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$127,926 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $28,560 — penalty dated 2026-02-26
- $52,192 — penalty dated 2024-11-06
- $37,001 — penalty dated 2024-06-28
- $10,173 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to INTEGRITUS HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 02/01/2022 |
| INTEGRITUS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/30/2022 |
| INTEGRITUS HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2022 |
| BRAGDON, TRICIA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| JONES, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/30/2022 |
| RESNEVIC, KATHRYN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| GINGRAS, MARCIE JO | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2022 |
| STRAZNITSKAS, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| WHITCOMB, WINTHROP | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $943K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225304. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.